Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Survey of Principal Investigators on Earthquake Engineering Research Awards Made by the National Science Foundation, 2003-2009, 11821-11822 [2011-4772]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Notices
benefit all stakeholders in the
distribution chain. This information
will help the Office understand how the
video programming marketplace
functions and the kinds of licensing
arrangements that drive the online
market.
Video-on-Demand. Over the past
decade, cable operators have offered
video-on-demand (‘‘VOD’’) services over
their platforms. VOD allows subscribers
to select and view individual television
programs and movies, for free or for a
fee, on an a la carte basis any time
during the day. The Office seeks
comment on how copyright owners
license content for VOD distribution,
and the extent to which it might obviate
the need for continued operation of the
section 111, 119 and 122 statutory
licenses.
Linear Channel Packaging. DirecTV
currently offers to its subscribers ‘‘The
101,’’ a satellite channel carrying older,
or recently cancelled, broadcast and
cable programming. In contrast to VOD,
which permits subscribers to select and
choose individual program offerings, the
101 is a linear channel designed and
structured by DirecTV that is available
to its customers on a 24 hour/7 days a
week basis. The Office seeks comment
on how DirecTV obtains and licenses
content for The 101, and the extent to
which such services might obviate the
need for continued operation of the
section 111, 119 and 122 statutory
licenses.
Online Video. It is likely that more
and more television programming will
migrate to the Internet in the years
ahead. Broadcast content is now widely
available to consumers through
streaming video services and perprogram downloads available at Apple’s
iTunes store and other outlets. In fact,
some estimate that fifty percent of
broadcast network content is available
on online platforms the day after it airs
on television.12 Many of these shows
have been available for free online for a
number of years through Web services
such as Hulu.com or directly from the
network’s Web site. Is the television
marketplace entering an era when the
current statutory licenses are no longer
needed because all broadcast
programming is becoming available
online?
In addition to the pantheon of free
online video services, there are two
burgeoning types of subscriber-based
streaming television models that have
gained notoriety in the marketplace.
First is the ‘‘TV Everywhere’’ model
12 How Much Network Programming Was
Actually ‘‘On Online’’ This Season? Clicker Blog,
https://www.clicker.com (July 13, 2010).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
where cable/satellite subscribers who
can confirm their TV subscription
through an online registration process,
can watch live cable programming on
the Web just as it appears on TV for no
additional charge.13 The second model
is exemplified by online subscription
services such as Hulu Plus and Netflix
that allow subscribers to watch
television shows and motion pictures
online by paying a monthly fee directly
to the service, without the need to be a
cable or satellite subscriber.14 And, it is
worth noting that the broadcast industry
is also taking part in the development of
a secured online distribution system,
powered by Syncbak, which will enable
the online viewing of local television
signals in their local markets.15
Questions for the public. The Office
seeks comment on how broadcast
content is licensed for distribution over
the Internet and what types of business
models are likely to succeed in the
online space. Further, the Office seeks
comment on whether the TV
Everywhere effort and popular services,
such as Hulu and Netflix, will
eventually offer live broadcast signals to
their subscribers with a broadband
connection. If so, we ask what licensing
models might be used to clear the public
performance rights for programs carried
by television broadcast stations for
online distribution, by aggregators like
Hulu, or through technological
solutions, as exemplified by Syncbak,
and whether these alternative means of
obtaining access to broadcast
programming will vitiate the rationale
underlying the Section 111, 119 and 122
statutory licenses.
IV. Conclusion
The Office hereby seeks comment
from the public on the factual and
13 Comcast will begin to stream live content from
Time Warner’s cable networks later this year under
their TV Everywhere licensing agreement. See Todd
Spangler, Comcast, Turner Broaden TV Everywhere
Pact to Cover Live Streaming, https://
www.broadcastingcable.com (Feb. 2, 2011). There
are no press reports indicating whether or when
cable operators will be carrying broadcast content
under the TV Everywhere plan.
14 Hulu management has recently discussed
recasting the service as an ‘‘online cable operator’’
that would use the Internet to send live television
channels and video-on-demand content to
subscribers. See Sam Schechner and Jessica
Vascellaro, Hulu Reworks Its Script as Digital
Change Hits TV, Wall Street Journal, January 27,
2011.
15 Syncbak’s proprietary authentication
technology synchronizes broadband and broadcast
delivery of television, creating a means for viewers
to watch broadcast content in real-time on any
broadband enabled device. See https://
www.syncbak.com. Syncbak offers a technical
solution to the Internet delivery of broadcast
stations; it is not an agent for clearing the public
performance rights for programs carried on such
stations.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11821
policy matters related to the study
mandated by Section 302 of the Satellite
Television Extension and Localism Act
of 2010. If there are any additional
pertinent issues not discussed above,
the Office encourages interested parties
to raise those matters in their comments.
In addition, the Office is considering
having a roundtable or formal hearing
on the matters raised in this NOI in June
2011. An announcement of such a
proceeding, if it were to occur, will be
provided by public notice in the future.
Dated: February 25, 2011.
Maria A. Pallante,
Acting Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2011–4717 Filed 3–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4110–30–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request Survey of Principal
Investigators on Earthquake
Engineering Research Awards Made
by the National Science Foundation,
2003–2009
Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National
Science Foundation has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
the information collection listed below.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on October 22, 2010 (volume
75, number 204, page 65385) and
allowed 60-days for public comment.
No comments were received from
members of the public. The purpose of
this notice is to allow an additional 30
days for public comment.
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies are invited
on one or more of the following points:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the function of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
11822
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Notices
Comments: Written comments and/or
suggestions regarding the item(s)
contained in this notice, especially
regarding the estimated public burden
and associated response time, should be
directed to the: Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Regulatory Affairs,
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–6974, Attention: Desk
Officer for NSF. To request more
information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection
plans and instruments, contact Dr. Joy
Pauschke, National Science Foundation,
Suite 545, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington,
VA, 22230, or call non-toll-free number
703–292–8360, or e-mail your request,
including your address to:
jpauschk@nsf.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication. NSF may not conduct
or sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Proposed Collection: Title: Survey of
Principal Investigators on Earthquake
Engineering Research Awards Made by
the National Science Foundation, 2003–
2009. Type of Information Collection
Request: New collection. Need and Use
of Information Collection: At the end of
fiscal year 2014, NSF will have
completed ten years of support for
operations and research of the George E.
Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake
Engineering Simulation (NEES). The
purpose of the proposed information
collection is to inform decision making
about the need for multi-user
earthquake engineering research
infrastructure beyond 2014. The
proposed data collection will consist of
a survey of Principal Investigators on
NSF earthquake engineering research
awards, including but not limited to
research awards made by the NEES
program to facilitate use of the NEES
network and infrastructure. Categories
of information to be collected from these
individuals include: (1) Novelty of
research questions and approach; (2)
access to and use of specific types of
research infrastructure (including those
provided by the NEES network); (3)
incorporation of education, outreach,
and training activities; (4) number and
diversity of participants in funded
research activities; and (5) outputs and
outcomes of funded research activities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Frequency of Response: Once. Affected
Public: Individuals. Type of
Respondents: NSF grantees. The annual
reporting burden is as follows:
Estimated Number of Respondents: 194
per year. Estimated Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1. Average
Burden Hours Per Response: 0.5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours
Requested: 97. The annualized cost to
respondents is estimated at: $3,777.
There are no Capital Costs to report.
There are no Operating or Maintenance
Costs to report.
Dated: February 28, 2011.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2011–4772 Filed 3–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Comment Request: National Science
Foundation—Applicant Survey
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request renewed clearance of this
collection. In accordance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
we are providing opportunity for public
comment on this action. After obtaining
and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting
OMB clearance of this collection for no
longer than 3 years.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by May 2, 2011 to be assured
of consideration. Comments received
after that date will be considered to the
extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Rm.
295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton at (703) 292–7556 or
send e-mail to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: ‘‘National Science
Foundation Applicant Survey.’’
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0096.
Expiration Date of Approval: June 30,
2011.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to extend with revision an
information collection for three years.
Proposed Project: The current
National Science Foundation Applicant
survey has been in use for several years.
Data are collected from applicant pools
to examine the racial/sexual/disability
composition and to determine the
source of information about NSF
vacancies.
Use of the Information: Analysis of
the applicant pools is necessary to
determine if NSF’s targeted recruitment
efforts are reaching groups that are
underrepresented in the Agency’s
workforce and/or to defend the
Foundation’s practices in
discrimination cases.
Burden on the Public: The Foundation
estimates about 4,000 responses
annually at 1 minute per response; this
computes to approximately 67 hours
annually.
Dated: February 28, 2011.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2011–4760 Filed 3–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026; NRC–
2008–0252]
Southern Nuclear Operating Company;
Notice of Availability of Application for
a Combined License
On March 28, 2008, Southern Nuclear
Operating Company (SNC), acting on
behalf of itself and Georgia Power
Company, Oglethorpe Power
Corporation (an Electric Membership
Corporation), Municipal Electric
Authority of Georgia, and the City of
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11821-11822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4772]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Survey of Principal
Investigators on Earthquake Engineering Research Awards Made by the
National Science Foundation, 2003-2009
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National Science Foundation has submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and
approve the information collection listed below. This proposed
information collection was previously published in the Federal Register
on October 22, 2010 (volume 75, number 204, page 65385) and allowed 60-
days for public comment. No comments were received from members of the
public. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days
for public comment.
Request for Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies are invited on one or more of the
following points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on those who are to
respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
[[Page 11822]]
Comments: Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s)
contained in this notice, especially regarding the estimated public
burden and associated response time, should be directed to the: Office
of Management and Budget, Office of Regulatory Affairs, OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202-395-6974, Attention: Desk
Officer for NSF. To request more information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, contact
Dr. Joy Pauschke, National Science Foundation, Suite 545, 4201 Wilson
Blvd, Arlington, VA, 22230, or call non-toll-free number 703-292-8360,
or e-mail your request, including your address to: jpauschk@nsf.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days
of the date of this publication. NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to the collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Proposed Collection: Title: Survey of Principal Investigators on
Earthquake Engineering Research Awards Made by the National Science
Foundation, 2003-2009. Type of Information Collection Request: New
collection. Need and Use of Information Collection: At the end of
fiscal year 2014, NSF will have completed ten years of support for
operations and research of the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for
Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES). The purpose of the proposed
information collection is to inform decision making about the need for
multi-user earthquake engineering research infrastructure beyond 2014.
The proposed data collection will consist of a survey of Principal
Investigators on NSF earthquake engineering research awards, including
but not limited to research awards made by the NEES program to
facilitate use of the NEES network and infrastructure. Categories of
information to be collected from these individuals include: (1) Novelty
of research questions and approach; (2) access to and use of specific
types of research infrastructure (including those provided by the NEES
network); (3) incorporation of education, outreach, and training
activities; (4) number and diversity of participants in funded research
activities; and (5) outputs and outcomes of funded research activities.
Frequency of Response: Once. Affected Public: Individuals. Type of
Respondents: NSF grantees. The annual reporting burden is as follows:
Estimated Number of Respondents: 194 per year. Estimated Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Burden Hours Per Response: 0.5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours Requested: 97. The annualized cost
to respondents is estimated at: $3,777. There are no Capital Costs to
report. There are no Operating or Maintenance Costs to report.
Dated: February 28, 2011.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2011-4772 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P