Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks Comment on Application of New and Emerging Technologies for Video Relay Service Use, 11462-11464 [2011-4646]
Download as PDF
11462
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 2 —REGISTRANTS OF CANCELLED PRODUCTS
EPA company No.
Company name and address
4 ....................................
352 ................................
498 ................................
2915 ..............................
3862 ..............................
8842 ..............................
9198 ..............................
44446 ............................
45188 ............................
50534 ............................
53883 ............................
64240 ............................
66330 ............................
84456 ............................
Bonide Products, Inc., Agent Registrations By Design, Inc., P.O. Box 1019, Salem, VA 24153–3805.
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., Inc. (S300/419), 1007 Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19898–0001.
Chase Products Co., P.O. Box 70, Maywood, IL 60153.
The Fuller Brush Company, One Fuller Way, Great Bend, KS 67530.
ABC Compounding Co, Inc., P.O. Box 16247, Atlanta, GA 30321.
Fumakilla Ltd., 1330 Dillon Heights Ave, Baltimore, MD 21228–1199.
The Anderson’s Lawn Fertilizer Division, Inc., P.O. Box 119, Maumee, OH 43537.
Quest Chemical Company, 12255 F.M., 529 Northwoods Industrial Park, Houston, TX 77041.
Harrison Specialty Co., Inc., 15 University-P.O. Box H, Canton, MA 02021.
GB Biosciences Corporation, 410 Swing Rd., P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419–5458.
Control Solutions, Inc., 427 Hide Away Circle, Cub Run, KY 42729.
Combat Insect Control Systems, 122 C Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20001.
Arysta Lifescience North America, LLC, 155401 Weston Parkway, Suite 150, Cary, NC 27513.
Hebei Veyong Bio-Chemical Co., Ltd., Agent Wagner Regulatory Associates, Inc., 4760 Lancaster Pike, Suite 9, P.O.
Box 640, Hockessin, DE 19707–0640.
Sathaporn Marketing Company, Ltd., 1330 Dillon Heights Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21228–1199.
RedEagle International LLC, Agent Wagner Regulatory Associates, Inc., 4760 Lancaster Pike, Suite 9, P.O. Box 640,
Hockessin, DE 19707–0640.
Wilbur Ellis Company, P.O. Box 1286, Fresno, CA 93715.
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., ATTN: Regulatory Affairs, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419–8300.
84538 ............................
85678 ............................
CA900010; CA910030 ..
FL890033 KY030003;
KY030004;
TX040007;
WA060003.
OR910028 .....................
WA070003 ....................
AMVAC Chemical Corporation, D/B/A AMVAC, 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1250, Newport Beach, CA 92660–1706.
Gowan Company, P.O. Box 5569, Yuma, AZ 85336–5569.
III. Summary of Public Comments
Received and Agency Response to
Comments
During the public comment period
provided, EPA received no comments in
response to the August 4, 2010 Federal
Register notice announcing the
Agency’s receipt of the requests for
voluntary cancellations of products
listed in Table 1 of Unit II.
IV. Cancellation Order
Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f), EPA
hereby approves the requested
cancellations of the registrations
identified in Table 1 of Unit II.
Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders
that the product registrations identified
in Table 1 of Unit II are canceled. The
effective date of the cancellations that
are subject of this notice is March 2,
2011. Any distribution, sale, or use of
existing stocks of the products
identified in Table 1 of Unit II. in a
manner inconsistent with any of the
provisions for disposition of existing
stocks set forth in Unit VI. will be a
violation of FIFRA.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
V. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that
a registrant of a pesticide product may
at any time request that any of its
pesticide registrations be canceled or
amended to terminate one or more uses.
FIFRA further provides that, before
acting on the request, EPA must publish
a notice of receipt of any such request
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
in the Federal Register. Thereafter,
following the public comment period,
the EPA Administrator may approve
such a request. The notice of receipt for
this action was published for comment
in the Federal Register issue of August
4, 2010 (75 FR 46932) (FRL–8837–9).
The comment period closed on January
31, 2011.
VI. Provisions for Disposition of
Existing Stocks
Existing stocks are those stocks of
registered pesticide products which are
currently in the United States and
which were packaged, labeled, and
released for shipment prior to the
effective date of the cancellation action.
The existing stocks provisions for the
products subject to this order are as
follows.
The registrants may continue to sell
and distribute existing stocks of
products listed in Table 1 of Unit II.
until [insert date 1 year after publication
of the Cancellation Order], which is 1
year after the publication of the
Cancellation Order in the Federal
Register Thereafter, the registrants are
prohibited from selling or distributing
products listed in Table 1, except for
export in accordance with FIFRA
section 17, or proper disposal. Persons
other than the registrants may sell,
distribute, or use existing stocks of
products listed in Table 1 of Unit II.
until existing stocks are exhausted,
provided that such sale, distribution, or
use is consistent with the terms of the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
previously approved labeling on, or that
accompanied, the canceled products.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
Dated: February 24, 2011.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011–4656 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[CG Docket No. 10–51; DA 11–317]
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau Seeks Comment on
Application of New and Emerging
Technologies for Video Relay Service
Use
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission seeks comment regarding
new and emerging technologies that
may be used to access Video Relay
Service (VRS). With the proliferation of
access to VRS through mobile
technologies, the Commission has an
interest in gathering information about
use of these technologies in compliance
with the Commission’s rules. Comments
received in response to this document
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices
will supplement the comments received
in response to the VRS Structure and
Practices Notice of Inquiry (VRS
Structure and Practices NOI), and will
be incorporated into the record of that
proceeding.
DATES: Comments are due April 1, 2011.
Reply comments are due April 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: FCC Headquarters at 445
12th Street, SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. You may submit
comments, identified by [CG Docket No.
10–51], by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS) https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Filers should
follow the instructions provided on the
Web site for submitting comments and
transmit one electronic copy of the
filing to each docket number referenced
in the caption, which in this case is CG
Docket No. 10–51. For ECFS filers, in
completing the transmittal screen, filers
should include their full name, U.S.
Postal Service mailing address, and the
applicable docket number.
• Parties may also submit an
electronic comment by Internet e-mail.
To get filing instructions, filers should
send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and
include the following words in the body
of the message, ‘‘get form {your e-mail
address}. A sample form and directions
will be sent in response.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. In addition,
parties must send one copy to the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or
via e-mail to fcc@bcpiweb.com. Filings
can be sent by hand or messenger
delivery, by commercial overnight
courier, or by first-class or overnight
U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings
must be addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th Street, SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners.
• Envelopes must be disposed of
before entering the building. The filing
hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service firstclass, Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Mason, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability
Rights Office, at (202) 418–7126 or
Diane.Mason@fcc.gov.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau Seeks Comment on Application
of New and Emerging Technologies for
Video Relay Service Use, Public Notice,
document DA 11–317, released on
February 17, 2011, in CG Docket No.
10–51.
The full text of document DA 11–317
and copies of any subsequently filed
documents in this matter will be
available for public inspection and
copying via ECFS, and during regular
business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. They may also
be purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC
20554, telephone: (800) 378–3160, fax:
(202) 488–5563, or Internet: https://
www.bcpiweb.com. Document DA
11–317 can also be downloaded in
Word or Portable Document Format
(PDF) at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy.
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau at
202–418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432
(TTY).
In the VRS Structure and Practices
NOI, the Commission designated the ex
parte status of the proceeding as
‘‘permit-but-disclose,’’ so any
presentations related to document DA
11–317 will also be designated as such.
Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.1200 et. seq., this
matter shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-butdisclose’’ proceeding in accordance with
the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentations must contain summaries
of the substance of the presentations
and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two
sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally
required. Other rules pertaining to oral
and written ex parte presentations in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11463
permit-but-disclose proceedings are set
forth in 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Synopsis
As part of ongoing VRS reform efforts
associated with the VRS Structure and
Practices NOI, the Bureau seeks
additional comment and information
regarding new and emerging
technologies that may be used to access
VRS. See Structure and Practices of the
Video Relay Service Program, Notice of
Inquiry, published at 75 FR 41863, July
19, 2010. In the VRS Structure and
Practices NOI, the Commission sought
comment on how to improve the VRS
program ‘‘to ensure that it is available to
and used by the full spectrum of eligible
users, encourages innovation, and is
provided efficiently so as to be less
susceptible to the waste, fraud, and
abuse that plague the current program
and threaten its long-term viability.’’
The NOI also sought comment on a
number of issues concerning the
provision of off-the-shelf video
equipment, including the extent to
which such equipment is available and
affordable to VRS consumers, the extent
to which this equipment can serve as an
acceptable substitute for videophone
equipment and software specifically
designed for VRS users, and the extent
to which changes in the VRS program
are needed to allow consumers to use
such equipment for VRS calls. Given the
recent proliferation of these video
technologies, the Bureau now requests
that interested parties provide
additional information and comment on
the specific functionalities of these
devices as they relate to the provision
and use of VRS as follows:
• What specific features or functions
of off-the-shelf equipment, services, and
software are needed to effectively use
VRS? Commenters should specify
whether each feature or function is
necessary to use VRS and point-to-point
communications or could be optional.
What broadband speeds and frames-persecond transmission rates are necessary
for acceptable video quality? What lux
(lx) level ratings are required for a
camera to produce acceptable images in
low light settings? What other features
must a camera have (e.g., pan, zoom,
tilt)? How much jitter (lateral and
angular) is tolerable?
• To what extent are consumers
currently using off-the-shelf video
communication software and/or
platforms in connection with VRS? How
often do consumers use these
technologies (e.g., Skype, Apple
FaceTime) as compared to equipment
and software issued by VRS providers
for point-to-point communications?
What are the advantages and
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
11464
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Notices
disadvantages of the off-the-shelf
technologies compared to technologies
provided by VRS-providers? For
example, are there specific
functionalities—for either VRS or pointto-point communications—that these
technologies offer that are not available
on devices issued by providers? What
are the current limitations of such
technologies (e.g., with respect to
interoperability, numbering, emergency
services) and to what extent do such
limitations impede their use by persons
who rely on VRS? Do such off-the-shelf
technologies comply with the
Commission’s current rules? If they do
not comply, in what ways do they not
comply?
Federal Communications Commission.
Karen Peltz Strauss,
Deputy Bureau Chief, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2011–4646 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
on the subjects listed below on
Thursday, March 3, 2011, in Room TW–
C305, at 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC.
The Commission will hear Item Nos.
1 thru 3 in a morning session from 10
a.m. to 12 p.m. An afternoon session
featuring Item Nos. 4 thru 7 will
commence at 2 p.m.
Sunshine Act Meeting; Open
Commission Meeting; Thursday, March
3, 2011
February 24, 2011.
The Federal Communications
Commission will hold an Open Meeting
Bureau
Subject
1
Media ..............................................................
2
Wireless Telecommunications .......................
3
Consumer & Governmental Affairs ................
4
* * * ...............................................................
Media ..............................................................
5
Wireline Competition ......................................
6
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Item
No.
Wireless Telecommunications and Consumer
& Governmental Affairs.
7
Media ..............................................................
Title: Policies to Promote Rural Radio Service and to Streamline Allotment and Assignment Procedures (MB Docket No. 09–52; RM–11528).
Summary: The Commission will consider an Order to revise rules or establish waiver
standards that will make it easier for Native Nations to provide radio service to areas
that are the functional equivalent of Tribal Lands and to Tribal Lands that are small or
irregularly shaped; and to adjust policies for determining whether proposed new radio
stations or station moves constitute an equitable distribution of radio service under Section 307(b) of the Communications Act. A Further Notice seeks comment on adopting a
Tribal eligibility requirement or a Tribal bidding credit to foster radio service by Native
Nations on their lands.
Title: Improving Communications Services for Native Nations by Promoting Greater Utilization of Spectrum Over Tribal Lands.
Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to explore a
range of recommendations to help close the wireless gap on Tribal Lands.
Title: Improving Communications Services for Native Nations.
Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Inquiry that explores ways to overcome the barriers to deployment of communications services to Native Nations communities, and to improve consultation and coordination with Native Nations.
Break * * *.
Title: Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Related to Retransmission Consent (MB
Docket No. 10–71).
Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that seeks
comment on changes to rules governing or affecting retransmission consent negotiations between broadcasters and multichannel video programming distributors.
Title: Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96–45); Lifeline and
Link Up (WC Docket No. 03–109); Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization.
Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reform and
modernize the universal service Lifeline and Link Up programs by eliminating waste,
fraud, and abuse; improving program administration, accountability, and fiscal responsibility; and updating the program in light of market and technology changes, including to
support pilot programs for broadband adoption.
Title: Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010
(CG Docket No. 10–213); Amendments to the Commission’s rules implementing Sections 255 and 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (WT Docket No. 96–198) and Accessible Mobile Phone
Options for People who are Blind, Deaf-Blind, or Have Low Vision (CG Docket No. 10–
145).
Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that seeks
comment on rules implementing provisions of the Twenty-First Century Communications
and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA). The NPRM proposes rules requiring providers of advanced communications services and manufacturers of equipment used for
those services to make their products accessible to people with disabilities.
Title: Video Description: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and
Video Accessibility Act of 2010.
Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to reinstate
the video description rules adopted by the Commission in 2000, as directed in the
CVAA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:34 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11462-11464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4646]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[CG Docket No. 10-51; DA 11-317]
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks Comment on
Application of New and Emerging Technologies for Video Relay Service
Use
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission seeks comment regarding new
and emerging technologies that may be used to access Video Relay
Service (VRS). With the proliferation of access to VRS through mobile
technologies, the Commission has an interest in gathering information
about use of these technologies in compliance with the Commission's
rules. Comments received in response to this document
[[Page 11463]]
will supplement the comments received in response to the VRS Structure
and Practices Notice of Inquiry (VRS Structure and Practices NOI), and
will be incorporated into the record of that proceeding.
DATES: Comments are due April 1, 2011. Reply comments are due April 18,
2011.
ADDRESSES: FCC Headquarters at 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. You may submit comments, identified by [CG Docket
No. 10-51], by any of the following methods:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the Commission's Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS) https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow
the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting comments and
transmit one electronic copy of the filing to each docket number
referenced in the caption, which in this case is CG Docket No. 10-51.
For ECFS filers, in completing the transmittal screen, filers should
include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the
applicable docket number.
Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet
e-mail. To get filing instructions, filers should send an e-mail to
ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following words in the body of the
message, ``get form {your e-mail address{time} . A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. In addition, parties
must send one copy to the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or
via e-mail to fcc@bcpiweb.com. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger
delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to
the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners.
Envelopes must be disposed of before entering the
building. The filing hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Mason, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, at (202) 418-7126 or
Diane.Mason@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks Comment on Application
of New and Emerging Technologies for Video Relay Service Use, Public
Notice, document DA 11-317, released on February 17, 2011, in CG Docket
No. 10-51.
The full text of document DA 11-317 and copies of any subsequently
filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection
and copying via ECFS, and during regular business hours at the FCC
Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. They may also be purchased from the
Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone: (800) 378-3160, fax: (202) 488-5563, or Internet: https://www.bcpiweb.com. Document DA 11-317 can also be downloaded in Word or
Portable Document Format (PDF) at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy. To
request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).
In the VRS Structure and Practices NOI, the Commission designated
the ex parte status of the proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose,'' so
any presentations related to document DA 11-317 will also be designated
as such. Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.1200 et. seq., this matter shall be
treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the
Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations
are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain
summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a
listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence
description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in
permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Synopsis
As part of ongoing VRS reform efforts associated with the VRS
Structure and Practices NOI, the Bureau seeks additional comment and
information regarding new and emerging technologies that may be used to
access VRS. See Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service
Program, Notice of Inquiry, published at 75 FR 41863, July 19, 2010. In
the VRS Structure and Practices NOI, the Commission sought comment on
how to improve the VRS program ``to ensure that it is available to and
used by the full spectrum of eligible users, encourages innovation, and
is provided efficiently so as to be less susceptible to the waste,
fraud, and abuse that plague the current program and threaten its long-
term viability.'' The NOI also sought comment on a number of issues
concerning the provision of off-the-shelf video equipment, including
the extent to which such equipment is available and affordable to VRS
consumers, the extent to which this equipment can serve as an
acceptable substitute for videophone equipment and software
specifically designed for VRS users, and the extent to which changes in
the VRS program are needed to allow consumers to use such equipment for
VRS calls. Given the recent proliferation of these video technologies,
the Bureau now requests that interested parties provide additional
information and comment on the specific functionalities of these
devices as they relate to the provision and use of VRS as follows:
What specific features or functions of off-the-shelf
equipment, services, and software are needed to effectively use VRS?
Commenters should specify whether each feature or function is necessary
to use VRS and point-to-point communications or could be optional. What
broadband speeds and frames-per-second transmission rates are necessary
for acceptable video quality? What lux (lx) level ratings are required
for a camera to produce acceptable images in low light settings? What
other features must a camera have (e.g., pan, zoom, tilt)? How much
jitter (lateral and angular) is tolerable?
To what extent are consumers currently using off-the-shelf
video communication software and/or platforms in connection with VRS?
How often do consumers use these technologies (e.g., Skype, Apple
FaceTime) as compared to equipment and software issued by VRS providers
for point-to-point communications? What are the advantages and
[[Page 11464]]
disadvantages of the off-the-shelf technologies compared to
technologies provided by VRS-providers? For example, are there specific
functionalities--for either VRS or point-to-point communications--that
these technologies offer that are not available on devices issued by
providers? What are the current limitations of such technologies (e.g.,
with respect to interoperability, numbering, emergency services) and to
what extent do such limitations impede their use by persons who rely on
VRS? Do such off-the-shelf technologies comply with the Commission's
current rules? If they do not comply, in what ways do they not comply?
Federal Communications Commission.
Karen Peltz Strauss,
Deputy Bureau Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2011-4646 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P