Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Independent Research and Development Technical Descriptions (DFARS Case 2010-D011), 11414-11415 [2011-4528]
Download as PDF
11414
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(h) The Secretary of Defense may
instruct the head of the agency
proposing a multiyear contract to
include in that contract negotiated
priced options for varying the quantities
of end items to be procured over the life
of the contract (10 U.S.C. 2306b(j)).
5. Section 217.173 is revised to read
as follows:
217.173 Multiyear contracts for military
family housing.
The head of the agency may enter into
multiyear contracts for periods up to
four years for supplies and services
required for management, maintenance,
and operation of military family housing
and may pay the costs of such contracts
for each year from annual
appropriations for that year (10 U.S.C.
2829).
217.174
[Removed]
6. Section 217.174 is removed.
[FR Doc. 2011–4525 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 231
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Independent
Research and Development Technical
Descriptions (DFARS Case 2010–D011)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
require contractors to report
independent research and development
(IR&D) projects generating annual costs
in excess of $50,000.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before May
2, 2011, to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2010–D011,
using any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal by inputting
‘‘DFARS Case 2010–D011’’ under the
heading ‘‘Enter keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘DFARS Case 2010–D011.’’ Follow
the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
a Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘DFARS Case 2010–D011’’ on your
attached document. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2010–D011 in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: 703–602–0350.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Mr. Mark Gomersall,
OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room
3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check https://www.regulations.gov
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Gomersall, 703–602–0302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This proposed rule revises
requirements for reporting IR&D projects
that generate annual costs in excess of
$50,000 to the Defense Technical
Information Center (DTIC). Beginning in
the 1990s, DoD reduced its technical
exchanges with industry, in part to
ensure independence of IR&D. The
result has been a loss of linkage between
funding and technological purpose. The
reporting requirements, as mandated by
10 U.S.C. 2372, will provide in-process
information from DoD-sponsored IR&D
projects to increase effectiveness by
providing visibility into the technical
content of industry IR&D activities to
meet DoD needs and promote the
technical prowess of the industry.
Without the collection of this
information, DoD will be unable to
maximize the value of the IR&D funds
the Department disburses without
infringing on the independence of
contractors to choose which
technologies to pursue in IR&D
programs.
II. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule has been determined to be
a significant regulatory action and
therefore is subject to review under
section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993. This rule is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis consistent with 5
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S.C. 603. A copy of the analysis may
be obtained from the point of contact
specified herein. The analysis is
summarized as follows:
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because reporting the IR&D
projects utilizing the DTIC on-line input
form does not require contractors to
expend significant effort or cost.
Furthermore, the threshold for reporting
annual IR&D costs in excess of $50,000,
as set forth in the rule, ensures that the
IR&D project reporting requirements
will not apply to a significant number
of small entities.
At this time, DoD is unable to
estimate the number of small entities to
which this rule will apply. Therefore,
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2010–D011) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule contains new
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). DoD invites public
comments on the following aspects of
the proposed rule: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of DoD, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate
of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. The following
is a summary of the information
collection requirement.
Title: Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part
231, Contract Cost Principles and
Procedures.
Type of Request: New collection.
Number of Respondents: 700.
Responses per Respondent: 38.5.
Annual Responses: 26,950.
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Average Burden per Response: 0.5
hours.
Annual Burden Hours: 13,475.
Needs and Uses: This information
collection requires contractors to report
IR&D projects generating annual costs in
excess of $50,000. The information will
provide in-process information from
DoD-sponsored IR&D projects to
increase the effectiveness by providing
visibility into the technical content of
industry IR&D activities to meet DoD
needs. Without the collection of this
information, DoD will be unable to
maximize the value of the IR&D funds
that it disburses without infringing on
the independence of a contractor to
choose which technologies to pursue in
its independent research and
development program.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit and not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of
Management and Budget, Desk Officer
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or e-mail
Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, with a
copy to the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Goemrsall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP
(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments can be received from 30 to 60
days after the date of this notice, but
comments to OMB will be most useful
if received by OMB within 30 days after
the date of this notice.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Gomersall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP
(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060,
or e-mail dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS
Case 2010–D011 in the subject line of
the message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 231
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Government procurement.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 231 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 231—CONTRACT COST
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 231 continues to read as follows:
16:22 Mar 01, 2011
2. Amend section 231.205–18 by
adding paragraph (c)(iii)(C) and revising
the introductory text of paragraph (c)(iv)
to read as follows:
231.205–18 Independent research and
development and bid and proposal costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) For a contractor’s annual IR&D
costs in excess of $50,000 to be
allowable, the IR&D projects generating
the costs must be reported to the
Defense Technical Information Center
(DTIC) using the DTIC’s on-line input
form and instructions. The inputs must
be updated at least annually and when
the project is completed. Copies of the
input and updates must be made
available for review by the cognizant
administrative contracting officer (ACO)
and the cognizant Defense Contract
Audit Agency auditor to support the
allowability of the costs.
(iv) For major contractors, the
cognizant ACO or corporate ACO
shall—
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–4528 Filed 3–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2011–0027]
RIN 2127–AK52
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Power-Operated Window,
Partition, and Roof Panel Systems
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking issued
pursuant to the Cameron Gulbransen
Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007.
The Act directed NHTSA to initiate a
rulemaking to consider requirements for
automatic reversal systems (ARS) for
power windows and to make a final
decision. The agency has decided not to
issue a final rule adopting any such new
requirements and instead to terminate
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11415
Effective March 2, 2011, the
proposed rule published September 1,
2009, at 74 FR 45143 is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
non-legal issues, you may call Michael
Pyne, NHTSA Office of Avoidance
Standards, telephone 202–366–1810.
For legal issues, you may call J. Edward
Glancy, NHTSA Office of Chief Counsel,
telephone 202–366–2992. You may send
mail to these officials at the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building, Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For the
reasons set forth below, we have
decided not to issue a final rule
adopting any new requirements for
automatic reversal systems (ARS) and
are withdrawing our 2009 proposal
regarding ARS. This document explains
our decision.
The Cameron Gulbransen Kids
Transportation Safety Act of 2007 (K. T.
Safety Act) directed the Secretary of
Transportation to initiate a rulemaking
to consider requiring all power
windows and panels on light motor
vehicles to stop closing and reverse
direction automatically when they
detect an obstruction, to prevent
children and others from being trapped,
injured, or killed. It also provided the
Secretary with discretion whether to
issue a final rule. It stated that if the
Secretary determines that additional
safety requirements are reasonable,
practicable and appropriate, the
Secretary shall issue those
requirements. Alternatively, it stated if
the Secretary determines that no
additional safety requirements meet
those criteria, the Secretary shall report
to Congress on the reasons for not
issuing such requirements.
In response to the K. T. Safety Act, the
Department’s National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA)
published in the Federal Register (74
FR 45143; September 1, 2009) a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
proposing new requirements for ARS.
The proposal discussed the agency’s
analysis of the injuries and fatalities
related to power windows and the
performance requirements that the
agency had recently adopted for safer
power window switches. The benefits of
the safer switches rules will be
increasingly realized as vehicles with
‘‘safer switches’’ replace older vehicles
lacking them.
After the agency analyzed and
considered the benefits and costs of
installing ARS for all types of vehicle
windows in developing the NPRM,
NHTSA decided to propose requiring
ARS on only one type of power
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11414-11415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4528]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 231
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Independent
Research and Development Technical Descriptions (DFARS Case 2010-D011)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to require contractors to report
independent research and development (IR&D) projects generating annual
costs in excess of $50,000.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before May 2, 2011, to be considered in
the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2010-D011,
using any of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting
``DFARS Case 2010-D011'' under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and
selecting ``Search.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that
corresponds with ``DFARS Case 2010-D011.'' Follow the instructions
provided at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and ``DFARS Case 2010-D011'' on your attached
document. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2010-D011 in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: 703-602-0350.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Gomersall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after submission to
verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted
by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, 703-602-0302.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This proposed rule revises requirements for reporting IR&D projects
that generate annual costs in excess of $50,000 to the Defense
Technical Information Center (DTIC). Beginning in the 1990s, DoD
reduced its technical exchanges with industry, in part to ensure
independence of IR&D. The result has been a loss of linkage between
funding and technological purpose. The reporting requirements, as
mandated by 10 U.S.C. 2372, will provide in-process information from
DoD-sponsored IR&D projects to increase effectiveness by providing
visibility into the technical content of industry IR&D activities to
meet DoD needs and promote the technical prowess of the industry.
Without the collection of this information, DoD will be unable to
maximize the value of the IR&D funds the Department disburses without
infringing on the independence of contractors to choose which
technologies to pursue in IR&D programs.
II. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule has been determined to be a significant regulatory action
and therefore is subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993.
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD has prepared an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603. A copy of the analysis may be obtained
from the point of contact specified herein. The analysis is summarized
as follows:
DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because reporting the IR&D projects utilizing the DTIC on-line input
form does not require contractors to expend significant effort or cost.
Furthermore, the threshold for reporting annual IR&D costs in excess of
$50,000, as set forth in the rule, ensures that the IR&D project
reporting requirements will not apply to a significant number of small
entities.
At this time, DoD is unable to estimate the number of small
entities to which this rule will apply. Therefore, DoD invites comments
from small business concerns and other interested parties on the
expected impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2010-D011) in
correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule contains new information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). DoD invites public
comments on the following aspects of the proposed rule: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of DoD, including whether the information
will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the
burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. The following is a summary of
the information collection requirement.
Title: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
Part 231, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures.
Type of Request: New collection.
Number of Respondents: 700.
Responses per Respondent: 38.5.
Annual Responses: 26,950.
[[Page 11415]]
Average Burden per Response: 0.5 hours.
Annual Burden Hours: 13,475.
Needs and Uses: This information collection requires contractors to
report IR&D projects generating annual costs in excess of $50,000. The
information will provide in-process information from DoD-sponsored IR&D
projects to increase the effectiveness by providing visibility into the
technical content of industry IR&D activities to meet DoD needs.
Without the collection of this information, DoD will be unable to
maximize the value of the IR&D funds that it disburses without
infringing on the independence of a contractor to choose which
technologies to pursue in its independent research and development
program.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit and not-for-profit
institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, or e-mail Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Mr. Mark Goemrsall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B855,
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Comments can be
received from 30 to 60 days after the date of this notice, but comments
to OMB will be most useful if received by OMB within 30 days after the
date of this notice.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection
instruments, please write to the Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Mr. Mark Gomersall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B855,
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, or e-mail
dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2010-D011 in the subject line of the
message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 231
Government procurement.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 231 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 231--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 231 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
2. Amend section 231.205-18 by adding paragraph (c)(iii)(C) and
revising the introductory text of paragraph (c)(iv) to read as follows:
231.205-18 Independent research and development and bid and proposal
costs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(iii) * * *
(C) For a contractor's annual IR&D costs in excess of $50,000 to be
allowable, the IR&D projects generating the costs must be reported to
the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) using the DTIC's on-
line input form and instructions. The inputs must be updated at least
annually and when the project is completed. Copies of the input and
updates must be made available for review by the cognizant
administrative contracting officer (ACO) and the cognizant Defense
Contract Audit Agency auditor to support the allowability of the costs.
(iv) For major contractors, the cognizant ACO or corporate ACO
shall--
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-4528 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P