Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection, 11309-11310 [2011-4590]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices
early as practicable before departure of
the aircraft’’. The FAA and PHMSA are
interested in investigating if current
airline processes afford sufficient time
for pilots in command to review the
NOTOC, particularly taking into
account the extensive demands of an
aircrew prior to departure. How do
Processes
airlines implement this policy and how
• While recognizing variance between can it be improved?
air carriers, what are the process(es)
leading to the generation of the NOTOC When the NOTOC is provided to
Emergency Responders
and its delivery to the pilot in
command?
• 49 CFR 175.33(c)(3) requires
• What are the processes involved in
NOTOCs to be readily accessible at the
providing emergency responders the
intended arrival airport. 49 CFR
information they require?
175.33(c)(4) requires NOTOCs (or the
information contained within NOTOC’s)
What are each stakeholder’s unique
to be issued to emergency responders at
informational needs?
reasonable times and locations. The
• When an onboard incident/
FAA, PHMSA, and relevant
emergency occurs not caused by or
stakeholders are well aware of instances
immediately associated with hazardous
of unacceptable delay in providing
materials how does (or how could) the
required information to emergency
information on the NOTOC impact a
responders. What improvements to this
pilot’s reaction? How does this compare process have been made or are being
to when hazardous materials are the
considered? How are airlines
suspected cause of an onboard incident? considering leveraging new technologies
• Are there notable instances where
where someday even ‘‘unintended’’
the presence of information or lack of
arrival airports would be aware of an
information impacted an air carrier’s,
aircraft’s hazardous materials?
pilot’s, or emergency responder’s course
Participation at the Public Meetings
of action?
• Should there be a distinction (i.e.
Attendance is open to the public.
format or information included)
Speakers should be prepared to limit
between passenger and cargo-only air
their oral remarks to 10 minutes in the
carriers?
event the number of speakers exceeds
the time allocated in the agenda.
General Questions
Goods Panel considers revisions to this
document.1
The FAA and PHMSA are interested
in acquiring a comprehensive
understanding of the entire NOTOC
system. Participants are encouraged to
address the following issues:
• For hazardous materials required to
be listed on NOTOCs, is there additional
information that would be useful? Is
there certain information extraneous to
NOTOC users?
• Are there certain excepted
hazardous materials not currently
required to be on a NOTOC that should
be included on the NOTOC? Are there
hazardous materials currently required
to be on the NOTOC that may not need
to be included?
• Can the format of the NOTOC be
improved? Should different versions be
considered for different users?
• Should consumer commodities be
addressed in an alternative manner?
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
When the NOTOC is provided to Flight
Crews
• 49 CFR 175.33(a) requires ‘‘accurate
and legible written information’’ be
provided to pilots in command, ‘‘as
1 Corresponding, but non-identical requirements
for NOTOCs can be found in Part7;4.1 of the ICAO
Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of
Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO TI). The Department
of Transportation has a history and statutory
mandate to harmonize with the ICAO TI when
safety considerations and the public interest are not
compromised. 49 USC 5120(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Public Meeting Procedures
A panel of representatives from the
FAA and PHMSA will be present. An
FAA representative will facilitate the
meetings in accordance with the
following procedures:
(1) The meetings are designed to
facilitate the public comment process.
The meetings will be informal and nonadversarial. No individual will be
subject to questioning by any other
participant. Government representatives
on the panel may ask questions to
clarify statements. Any statement made
during the meetings by a panel member
should not be construed as an official
position of the government.
a. One exception is that, time
permitting, attendees may be allowed to
ask questions following the FAA Air
Traffic Control Organization’s Briefing
on the Flight Object Initiative.
(2) There will be no admission fees or
other charges to attend or to participate
in the public meeting. The meeting will
be open to all persons, subject to the
capacity in the meeting room and the
web-conferencing system. Every effort
will be made to accommodate all
persons wishing to attend. The FAA and
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11309
PHMSA will try to accommodate all
speakers, subject to time constraints.
The FAA and PHMSA reserve the right
to exclude some speakers, if necessary,
to obtain balanced viewpoints.
(1) The FAA and PHMSA will review
and consider all material presented by
participants at the public meeting. If the
speaker wishes to provide handouts to
attendees, these materials shall be
provided by speaker.
(2) Presentations, supplemental data,
and other information may be provided
to FAA and PHMSA at the discretion of
the participant.
(3) Each person presenting comments
is asked to submit data to support the
comments. The FAA and PHMSA will
protect from disclosure all proprietary
data submitted in accordance with
applicable laws.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 18,
2011.
Christopher Glasow,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials.
[FR Doc. 2011–4237 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Docket No. FHWA–2011–0014
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Request for
Approval of a New Information
Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Request for Approval
of a New Information Collection.
AGENCY:
The FHWA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) approval of a new information
collection that is summarized below
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
are required to publish this notice in the
Federal Register by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by May
2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
2011–0014 by any of the following
methods:
Web Site: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
11310
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Notices
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Kuehn, 202–493–3414, Office of
Corporate Research, Technology, and
Innovation Management, Federal
Highway Administration, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Exploratory Advanced Research
(EAR) Program sponsored project titled
‘‘Effects of Automated Transit and
Pedestrian/Bicycling Facilities on Urban
Travel Patterns.’’
Type of request: New information
collection requirement.
Background: The Exploratory
Advanced Research (EAR) Program was
established to conduct longer term,
higher risk research that will result in a
potentially dramatic breakthrough for
improving the durability, efficiency,
environmental impact, productivity,
and safety of highway and intermodal
transportation systems. FHWA awarded
a research project titled ‘‘Effects of
Automated Transit and Pedestrian/
Bicycling Facilities on Urban Travel
Patterns’’ that was submitted in response
to a solicitation in 2009 and supports
the EAR Program focus area of new
technology and advanced policies for
energy and resource conservation. The
project conducted by the University of
Michigan with support from the
University of Illinois at Chicago has the
potential to lead to applications for
evidence-based policies and approaches
that could substantially reduce the
percentage and total number of short
trips using private vehicles and increase
the percentage and number of trips
using current and future transit
technology and non-motorized trips,
which would reduce use and
dependence on fossil fuels and
associated pollution impacts.
The research project is attempting to
gauge potential travel-behavior response
to far-reaching improvements in the
pedestrian, cycling, and transit
environments of neighborhoods. The
transit improvements are inspired by
the frequency and quality of service that
might be made possibility of future
technologies. The project is studying the
capacity of these improvements to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:42 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
generate the following kinds of shifts:
(1) Modal shift of neighborhood trips
from auto to other modes; (2) Increased
use of regional public transit based on
improved station access; and (3) Shift of
more remote non-work destinations to
destinations within the neighborhood.
To explore these issues, the research
team is building a model that integrates
activity-based and agent-based
components. The models in turn will be
based on a survey of residents in four
neighborhoods of metropolitan Chicago.
As part of the survey, respondents will
be presented with images representing
potential improvements to the
pedestrian, cycling, and transit
environments of their neighborhoods
and will respond to scenarios regarding
their travel under these altered
conditions.
We will mail 7,700 invitations with
an expectation of 1,400 residents
responding. From that pool, 800 will be
selected for the study, which includes a
survey packet, travel diary and phone
interview.
Respondents: We estimate that 1,400
residents will respond to the initial
invitation and 800 residents will
participate in the study.
Frequency: This is a one-time
collection.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: The invitation portion takes
approximately 15 minutes to complete.
1400 residents × 15 minutes = 350
hours.
The research study takes
approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes
(30 minutes for the survey packet and
travel diary and 1 hour for the phone
interview).
800 residents × 90 minutes = 1,200
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: The total burden for this onetime information collection would be
approximately 1,550 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the U.S.
DOT’s performance, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the U.S.
DOT’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the collected information;
and (4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: February 24, 2011.
Juli Huynh,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–4590 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Alternatives Analysis Program
Discretionary Funding Allocations
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Alternatives Analysis Program
Announcement of Project Selections.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) announces the
selection of projects funded with
unallocated Section 5339 Alternatives
Analysis Program funds in support of
DOT’s Livability Initiative, which was
announced in the Alternatives Analysis
Program Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) on May 28, 2010. The
Alternatives Analysis Program assists
potential sponsors of major transit
capital investments (‘‘New Starts’’ and
‘‘Small Starts’’ projects) in the evaluation
of all reasonable modal and multimodal
alternatives and general alignment
options to address transportation needs
in a defined travel corridor. Through
these funding awards, FTA will support
a limited number of alternatives
analyses, or technical work conducted
as part of proposed or on-going
alternatives analyses, that seek to
advance major transit investments that
foster the six livability principles of the
DOT–HUD–EPA Partnership for
Sustainable Communities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Successful applicants should contact
the appropriate FTA Regional office
(Appendix A) for specific information
regarding applying for the funds. For
general information on the Alternatives
Analysis Program, contact Kenneth
Cervenka, Office of Planning and
Environment, at (202) 493–0512 or
Kenneth.Cervenka@dot.gov.
SUMMARY:
A total of
$25,700,000 was available for FTA’s
Alternatives Analysis Program. A total
of $73,027,950 was requested for 67
projects, indicating significant demand
for funds. Project proposals were
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM
01MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11309-11310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4590]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Docket No. FHWA-2011-0014
Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for
Approval of a New Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Request for Approval of a New Information Collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public comments about our intention to
request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of a new
information collection that is summarized below under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. We are required to publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by May 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
2011-0014 by any of the following methods:
Web Site: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation,
[[Page 11310]]
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Kuehn, 202-493-3414, Office of
Corporate Research, Technology, and Innovation Management, Federal
Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Exploratory Advanced Research (EAR) Program sponsored
project titled ``Effects of Automated Transit and Pedestrian/Bicycling
Facilities on Urban Travel Patterns.''
Type of request: New information collection requirement.
Background: The Exploratory Advanced Research (EAR) Program was
established to conduct longer term, higher risk research that will
result in a potentially dramatic breakthrough for improving the
durability, efficiency, environmental impact, productivity, and safety
of highway and intermodal transportation systems. FHWA awarded a
research project titled ``Effects of Automated Transit and Pedestrian/
Bicycling Facilities on Urban Travel Patterns'' that was submitted in
response to a solicitation in 2009 and supports the EAR Program focus
area of new technology and advanced policies for energy and resource
conservation. The project conducted by the University of Michigan with
support from the University of Illinois at Chicago has the potential to
lead to applications for evidence-based policies and approaches that
could substantially reduce the percentage and total number of short
trips using private vehicles and increase the percentage and number of
trips using current and future transit technology and non-motorized
trips, which would reduce use and dependence on fossil fuels and
associated pollution impacts.
The research project is attempting to gauge potential travel-
behavior response to far-reaching improvements in the pedestrian,
cycling, and transit environments of neighborhoods. The transit
improvements are inspired by the frequency and quality of service that
might be made possibility of future technologies. The project is
studying the capacity of these improvements to generate the following
kinds of shifts: (1) Modal shift of neighborhood trips from auto to
other modes; (2) Increased use of regional public transit based on
improved station access; and (3) Shift of more remote non-work
destinations to destinations within the neighborhood.
To explore these issues, the research team is building a model that
integrates activity-based and agent-based components. The models in
turn will be based on a survey of residents in four neighborhoods of
metropolitan Chicago. As part of the survey, respondents will be
presented with images representing potential improvements to the
pedestrian, cycling, and transit environments of their neighborhoods
and will respond to scenarios regarding their travel under these
altered conditions.
We will mail 7,700 invitations with an expectation of 1,400
residents responding. From that pool, 800 will be selected for the
study, which includes a survey packet, travel diary and phone
interview.
Respondents: We estimate that 1,400 residents will respond to the
initial invitation and 800 residents will participate in the study.
Frequency: This is a one-time collection.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: The invitation portion takes
approximately 15 minutes to complete.
1400 residents x 15 minutes = 350 hours.
The research study takes approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes (30
minutes for the survey packet and travel diary and 1 hour for the phone
interview).
800 residents x 90 minutes = 1,200 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: The total burden for this one-
time information collection would be approximately 1,550 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the U.S. DOT's performance,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the U.S. DOT's estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (3) ways to enhance the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that the burden
could be minimized, including the use of electronic technology, without
reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will
summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: February 24, 2011.
Juli Huynh,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-4590 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P