Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands; Final 2011 and 2012 Harvest Specifications for Groundfish, 11139-11161 [2011-4538]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
reached, the possibility exists that they
would be closed prior to the expiration
of a 30-day delayed effectiveness period,
if implemented, because their TACs
could be reached. Certain fisheries, such
as those for pollock and Pacific cod are
intensive, fast-paced fisheries. Other
fisheries, such as those for flatfish,
rockfish, skates, squids, sharks, and
octopuses are critical as directed
fisheries and as incidental catch in other
fisheries. U.S. fishing vessels have
demonstrated the capacity to catch the
TAC allocations in these fisheries. If a
TAC is reached, NMFS would close
directed fishing or prohibit retention for
the applicable species, pending
completion of the 30-day delayed
effectiveness period. Any delay in
allocating the final TACs in these
fisheries would cause confusion to the
industry and potential economic harm
through unnecessary discards. Waiving
the 30-day delay allows NMFS to
prevent economic loss to fishermen that
could occur should 2011 TACs be
reached prior to the close of the 30 day
delay. Determining which fisheries may
close is impossible because these
fisheries are affected by several factors
that cannot be predicted in advance,
including fishing effort, weather,
movement of fishery stocks, and market
price. Furthermore, the closure of one
fishery has a cascading effect on other
fisheries by freeing-up fishing vessels,
allowing them to move from closed
fisheries to open ones, increasing the
fishing capacity in those open fisheries
and causing them to close at an
accelerated pace.
In fisheries subject to declining
sideboards, a failure to implement the
updated sideboards before initial
season’s end could preclude the
intended economic protection to the
non-sideboarded sectors. Conversely, in
fisheries with increasing sideboards,
economic benefit could be precluded to
the sideboarded sectors.
If the final harvest specifications are
not effective by March 12, 2011, which
is the start of the 2011 Pacific halibut
season as specified by the IPHC, the
hook-and-line sablefish fishery will not
begin concurrently with the Pacific
halibut IFQ season. This would result in
confusion for the industry and
economic harm from unnecessary
discard of sablefish that are caught
along with Pacific halibut, as both hookand-line sablefish and Pacific halibut
are managed under the same IFQ
program. Immediate effectiveness of the
final 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications will allow the sablefish
IFQ fishery to begin concurrently with
the Pacific halibut IFQ season. Also, the
immediate effectiveness of this action is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
required to provide consistent
management and conservation of fishery
resources based on the best available
scientific information. This is
particularly true of those species which
have lower 2011 ABCs and TACs than
those established in the 2010 and 2011
harvest specifications (75 FR 11749,
March 12, 2010). Immediate
effectiveness also would give the fishing
industry the earliest possible
opportunity to plan and conduct its
fishing operations with respect to new
information about TAC limits.
Therefore, NMFS finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Small Entity Compliance Guide
The following information is a plain
language guide to assist small entities in
complying with this final rule as
required by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This final rule’s primary purpose
is to announce the final 2011 and 2012
harvest specifications and prohibited
species bycatch allowances for the
groundfish fisheries of the GOA. This
action is necessary to establish harvest
limits and associated management
measures for groundfish during the 2011
and 2012 fishing years and to
accomplish the goals and objectives of
the FMP. This action affects all
fishermen who participate in the GOA
fisheries. The specific amounts of OFL,
ABC, TAC, and PSC are provided in
tables to assist the reader. NMFS will
announce closures of directed fishing in
the Federal Register and information
bulletins released by the Alaska Region.
Affected fishermen should keep
themselves informed of such closures.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1540(f), 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 105–277; Pub. L. 106–31; Pub. L.
106–554; Pub. L. 108–199; Pub. L. 108–447;
Pub. L. 109–241; Pub. L. 109–479.
Dated: February 22, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–4402 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11139
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 101126521–0640–02]
RIN 0648–XZ90
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands; Final 2011 and 2012
Harvest Specifications for Groundfish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; closures.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces final 2011
and 2012 harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch allowances for
the groundfish fishery of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands management area
(BSAI). This action is necessary to
establish harvest limits for groundfish
during the 2011 and 2012 fishing years,
and to accomplish the goals and
objectives of the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the BSAI (FMP).
The intended effect of this action is to
conserve and manage the groundfish
resources in the BSAI in accordance
with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
DATES: Effective from 1200 hrs, Alaska
local time (A.l.t.), March 1, 2011,
through 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31,
2012.
SUMMARY:
Electronic copies of the
Final Alaska Groundfish Harvest
Specifications Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), Record of Decision
(ROD), Supplementary Information
Report (SIR) to the EIS, the Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA),
and Supplemental FRFA prepared for
this action are available from https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. The final 2010
Stock Assessment and Fishery
Evaluation (SAFE) report for the
groundfish resources of the BSAI, dated
November 2010, is available from the
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) at 605 West 4th
Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK
99510–2252, phone 907–271–2809, or
from the Council’s Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Whitney, 907–586–7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal
regulations at 50 CFR part 679
implement the FMP and govern the
groundfish fisheries in the BSAI. The
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11140
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) prepared the FMP,
and NMFS approved it under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. General
regulations governing U.S. fisheries also
appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP and its implementing
regulations require NMFS, after
consultation with the Council, to
specify the total allowable catch (TAC)
for each target species; the sum must be
within the optimum yield (OY) range of
1.4 million to 2.0 million metric tons
(mt) (see § 679.20(a)(1)(i)). NMFS also
must specify apportionments of TACs,
prohibited species catch (PSC)
allowances, and prohibited species
quota (PSQ) reserves established by
§ 679.21; seasonal allowances of
pollock, Pacific cod, and Atka mackerel
TAC; Amendment 80 allocations; and
Community Development Quota (CDQ)
reserve amounts established by
§ 679.20(b)(1)(ii). The final harvest
specifications set forth in Tables 1
through 16 of this action satisfy these
requirements. The sum of TACs is
2,000,000 mt for 2011 and is 2,000,000
mt for 2012.
Section 679.20(c)(3)(i) further requires
NMFS to consider public comment on
the proposed annual TACs (and
apportionments thereof) and PSC
allowances, and to publish final harvest
specifications in the Federal Register.
The proposed 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications and PSC allowances for
the groundfish fishery of the BSAI were
published in the Federal Register on
December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76372).
Comments were invited and accepted
through January 7, 2011. NMFS received
9 letters with 4 comments on the
proposed harvest specifications. These
comments are summarized and
responded to in the ‘‘Response to
Comments’’ section of this rule. NMFS
consulted with the Council on the final
2011 and 2012 harvest specifications
during the December 2010 Council
meeting in Anchorage, AK. After
considering public comments, as well as
biological and economic data that were
available at the Council’s December
meeting, NMFS is implementing the
final 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications as recommended by the
Council.
Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) and
TAC Harvest Specifications
The final ABC levels are based on the
best available biological and
socioeconomic information, including
projected biomass trends, information
on assumed distribution of stock
biomass, and revised technical methods
used to calculate stock biomass. In
general, the development of ABCs and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
overfishing levels (OFLs) involves
sophisticated statistical analyses of fish
populations. The FMP specifies a series
of six tiers to define OFL and ABC
amounts based on the level of reliable
information available to fishery
scientists. Tier one represents the
highest level of information quality
available while tier six represents the
lowest.
In December 2010, the Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC), Advisory
Panel (AP), and Council reviewed
current biological information about the
condition of the BSAI groundfish stocks.
The Council’s Plan Team compiled and
presented this information in the 2010
SAFE report for the BSAI groundfish
fisheries, dated November 2010. The
SAFE report contains a review of the
latest scientific analyses and estimates
of each species’ biomass and other
biological parameters, as well as
summaries of the available information
on the BSAI ecosystem and the
economic condition of groundfish
fisheries off Alaska. The SAFE report
was made available for public review
upon notification of the proposed
harvest specifications. The 2010 SAFE
report continues to be available for
public review (see ADDRESSES). From
these data and analyses, the Plan Team
estimated an OFL and ABC for each
species or species category.
In December 2010, the SSC, AP, and
Council reviewed the Plan Team’s
recommendations. The SSC concurred
with the Plan Team’s recommendations,
and the Council adopted the OFL and
ABC amounts recommended by the SSC
(Table 1). The final TAC
recommendations were based on the
ABCs as adjusted for other biological
and socioeconomic considerations,
including maintaining the sum of the
TACs within the required OY range of
1.4 million to 2.0 million mt. The
Council adopted the AP’s 2011 and
2012 TAC recommendations. As
required by annual catch limit rules (FR
74 3178, January 16, 2009), none of the
Council’s recommended TACs for 2011
or 2012 exceeds the final 2011 or 2012
ABCs for any species category. The final
2010 and 2011 harvest specifications
approved by the Secretary are
unchanged from those recommended by
the Council and are consistent with the
preferred harvest strategy alternative in
the EIS (see ADDRESSES). NMFS finds
that the Council’s recommended OFLs,
ABCs, and TACs are consistent with the
biological condition of groundfish
stocks as described in the 2010 SAFE
report that was approved by the
Council.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Other Actions Potentially Affecting the
2011 and 2012 Harvest Specifications
NMFS intends to develop a single
database that stock assessment authors
can access through a single source such
as the Alaska Fisheries Information
Network. The development of this
database will require the cooperation of
several agencies, including NMFS, the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
and the International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC). At its October 2010
meeting, the Council’s groundfish Plan
Teams recommended the formation of a
total catch accounting working group to
assist NMFS in developing a
methodology to estimate total catch of
groundfish. While much of the
information is currently available and
will be incorporated into the final 2010
SAFE reports, the development of an
adequate methodology is ongoing and
not fully ready for use in the final SAFE
reports. NMFS intends to have the
information available for the assessment
cycle in the fall of 2011.
The Council is currently considering
an action to modify the non-Chinook
salmon management measures to
minimize non-Chinook salmon bycatch.
This potential action could impose cap
threshold limits, sector specific
allocations, and area specific closures
for BSAI groundfish closures. This
action is not expected to be in place by
the 2012 fishing year.
The Council has approved a new
program to replace the Gulf of Alaska
Rockfish Pilot Program (Rockfish
Program), which is scheduled to expire
on December 31, 2011. NMFS is
currently developing regulations to
implement this program. The new
rockfish program could alter BSAI
groundfish sideboards for vessels
participating in the Rockfish Program.
This new program is expected to be in
place for the 2012 fishing year.
In 2010, NMFS Alaska Region
completed a Section 7 formal
consultation on the effects of the
authorization of the Alaska groundfish
fisheries on Endangered Species Act
listed species under NMFS jurisdiction.
The consultation resulted in a biological
opinion that determined that the effects
of the Alaska groundfish fisheries were
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of, and adversely modify
designated critical habitat for, the
western distinct population segment of
Steller sea lions. The biological opinion
included a reasonable and prudent
alternative (RPA) that requires changes
to the BSAI Atka mackerel and Aleutian
Islands subarea Pacific cod fisheries to
prevent the likelihood of jeopardy of
extinction or adverse modification of
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
critical habitat for Steller sea lions.
Separate rulemaking for implementation
of the RPA became effective January 1,
2011 (FR 75 77535, December 13, 2010;
and 75 FR 81921, December 29, 2010).
Changes to the Atka mackerel and
Pacific cod harvest specifications that
are required by the rule implementing
the RPA are described in the section for
each of these target species. The
proposed harvest specifications notified
the public of possible changes to the
harvest specification limits.
At the October 2010 meeting, the
Council and the Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC)
recommended separating Kamchatka
flounder from the arrowtooth flounder
complex starting in the year 2011. As a
result, arrowtooth flounder and
Kamchatka flounder have separate
OFLs, ABCs, and TACs for 2011 and
2012. In the proposed 2011 and 2012
harvest specifications NMFS requested
public comment on the proposal to
allocate 10.7 percent of the Kamchatka
flounder TAC to the CDQ Program. Six
comments were received, and NMFS
has determined to not allocate
Kamchatka flounder to the six CDQ
groups in 2011. See the Response to
Comments section below.
Changes From the Proposed 2010 and
2011 Harvest Specifications in the BSAI
In October 2010, the Council made its
recommendations for the proposed 2011
and 2012 harvest specifications (75 FR
76372, December 8, 2010), based largely
on information contained in the 2009
SAFE report for the BSAI groundfish
fisheries. Through the proposed harvest
specifications, NMFS notified the public
that these harvest specifications were
subject to change and that the Council
would consider information contained
in the 2010 SAFE report,
recommendations from the SSC, Plan
Team, and AP committees, and public
testimony when making its
recommendations for final harvest
specification levels at the December
Council meeting. NMFS further notified
the public that, as required by the BSAI
Groundfish FMP and its implementing
regulations, the sum of the TACs must
be within the optimum yield range of
1.4 and 2.0 million metric tons.
Information contained in the 2010
SAFE reports indicates an increase in
biomass for several groundfish species.
At the December Council meeting, the
SSC recommended increasing the ABCs
for many species in 2011 and 2012
based on the best and most recent
information contained in the 2010 SAFE
reports. This increase resulted in an
ABC sum total that exceeds 2 million
metric tons for both 2011 and 2012.
Based on the SSC ABC
recommendations and the 2010 SAFE
reports, the AP recommended raising
the TACs for more economically
valuable species that have increasing
biomasses such as pollock, Pacific cod,
Pacific ocean perch, and Atka mackerel
in the Eastern Aleutian Islands and
Bering Sea subarea. Because these
increases caused the sum of the TACs to
exceed the 2 million metric ton limit,
11141
section 3.2.3.4 of the BSAI FMP
required that the TACs be adjusted. The
AP recommended a downward
adjustment of TACs for several species
that are not part of the directed fishery
and that are easily avoided, such as
octopuses, sculpins, sharks, skates,
squid, and Alaska plaice. After receiving
testimony from the Amendment 80
cooperatives, the AP recommended a
reduction in Amendment 80 flatfish
species TACs and arrowtooth flounder
TAC to levels that the Amendment 80
fleet believed they could harvest given
their PSC constraints. The Council
accepted the SSC and AP
recommendations.
The changes to TAC between the
proposed and final harvest
specifications are based on the most
recent scientific and economic
information and are consistent with the
FMP and regulatory obligations and
harvest strategy as described in the
proposed harvest specifications. These
changes are compared in the following
table.
Table 1 lists the Council’s
recommended final 2011 and 2012 OFL,
ABC, TAC, initial TAC (ITAC) and CDQ
reserve amounts of the BSAI groundfish.
NMFS concurs with these
recommendations. The final 2011 and
2012 TAC recommendations for the
BSAI are within the OY range
established for the BSAI and do not
exceed the ABC for any single species
or complex. The apportionment of TAC
amounts among fisheries and seasons is
discussed below.
COMPARISON OF FINAL 2011 AND 2012 WITH PROPOSED 2011 AND 2012 TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH IN THE BSAI
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Area 1
Pollock ...............................
BS ........................
AI ..........................
Bogoslof ...............
BSAI .....................
BS ........................
AI ..........................
EAI/BS .................
CAI .......................
WAI ......................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BS ........................
AI ..........................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BS ........................
EAI .......................
CAI .......................
WAI ......................
Pacific cod .........................
Sablefish ............................
Atka mackerel ....................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Yellowfin sole ....................
Rock sole ...........................
Greenland turbot ...............
Arrowtooth flounder ...........
Kamchatka flounder ..........
Flathead sole .....................
Other flatfish ......................
Alaska plaice .....................
Pacific ocean perch ...........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
2011
proposed
TAC
2011 final
TAC
Species
PO 00000
1,252,000
19,000
150
227,950
2,850
1,900
40,300
11,280
1,500
196,000
85,000
3,500
1,550
25,900
17,700
41,548
3,000
16,000
5,710
5,660
4,960
8,370
Frm 00067
1,107,000
19,000
75
207,580
2,500
1,860
20,900
26,000
18,100
213,000
90,000
3,700
1,670
60,000
17,700
60,000
17,300
40,000
3,790
4,180
4,230
6,480
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2011
difference
from
proposed
145,000
0
75
20,370
350
40
19,400
¥14,720
¥16,600
¥17,000
¥5,000
¥200
¥120
¥34,100
0
¥18,452
¥14,300
¥24,000
1,920
1,480
730
1,890
2012 final
TAC
1,253,658
19,000
150
229,608
2,610
1,740
36,800
10,293
1,500
197,660
85,000
3,500
1,450
25,900
17,700
41,548
3,000
16,000
5,710
5,660
4,960
8,370
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
2012
proposed
TAC
1,105,000
19,000
75
207,580
2,500
1,860
20,900
26,000
18,100
213,000
90,000
3,700
1,670
60,000
17,700
60,000
17,300
40,000
3,790
4,180
4,230
6,480
2012
difference
from
proposed
148,658
0
75
22,028
110
¥120
15,900
¥15,707
¥16,600
¥15,340
¥5,000
¥200
¥220
¥34,100
0
¥18,452
¥14,300
¥24,000
1,920
1,480
730
1,890
11142
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
COMPARISON OF FINAL 2011 AND 2012 WITH PROPOSED 2011 AND 2012 TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH IN THE BSAI—
Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2011
proposed
TAC
2011 final
TAC
2011
difference
from
proposed
2012 final
TAC
2012
proposed
TAC
2012
difference
from
proposed
Species
Area 1
Northern rockfish ...............
Shortraker rockfish ............
Rougheye rockfish 2 ...........
Squid .................................
Skates ................................
Sharks ...............................
Octopuses .........................
Sculpins .............................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BS/EAI .................
CAI/WAI ...............
BS ........................
AI ..........................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
BSAI .....................
4,000
393
234
220
500
500
425
16,500
50
150
5,200
7,290
387
42
489
485
555
1,970
30,000
449
233
30,035
¥3,290
6
192
¥269
15
¥55
¥1,545
¥13,500
¥399
¥83
¥24,835
4,000
393
240
225
500
500
425
16,500
50
150
5,200
7,290
387
42
489
485
555
1,970
30,000
449
233
30,035
¥3,290
6
198
¥264
15
¥55
¥1,545
¥13,500
¥399
¥83
¥24,835
Total ...........................
BSAI .....................
2,000,000
1,997,000
3,000
2,000,000
1,995,000
5,000
Other rockfish ....................
1 Bering
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Sea subarea (BS), Aleutian Islands subarea (AI), Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI), Eastern Aleutian District
(EAI), Central Aleutian District (CAI), and Western Aleutian District (WAI).
2 The proposed rule split rougheye rockfish TACs by the Aleutian Islands, and the Bering Sea. The final rule splits rougheye rockfish by the
Bering Sea and Eastern Aleutians District, and the Central Aleutian District and Western Aleutian District.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
Total ...............................
3,954,111
2,450,000
44,500
22,000
272,000
3,360
2,250
101,000
n/a
n/a
n/a
262,000
248,000
7,220
n/a
n/a
186,000
23,600
83,300
19,500
79,100
36,300
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10,600
524
549
n/a
n/a
1,700
n/a
n/a
2,620
37,800
1,360
528
58,300
OFL
2,534,729
1,270,000
36,700
156
235,000
2,850
1,900
85,300
40,300
24,000
21,000
239,000
224,000
6,140
4,590
1,550
153,000
17,700
69,300
14,500
65,100
24,700
5,710
5,660
4,960
8,370
8,670
393
454
234
220
1,280
710
570
1,970
31,500
1,020
396
43,700
ABC
2,000,000
1,252,000
19,000
150
227,950
2,850
1,900
53,080
40,300
11,280
1,500
196,000
85,000
5,050
3,500
1,550
25,900
17,700
41,548
3,000
16,000
24,700
5,710
5,660
4,960
8,370
4,000
393
454
234
220
1,000
500
500
425
16,500
50
150
5,200
TAC
2011
1,790,200
1,126,800
17,100
150
203,559
2,351
1,544
47,400
35,988
10,073
1,340
175,028
75,905
4,293
2,975
1,318
22,015
15,045
37,102
2,550
13,600
21,812
4,854
5,054
4,429
7,474
3,400
334
386
199
187
850
425
425
361
14,025
43
128
4,420
ITAC 2
199,467
125,200
1,900
0
24,391
392
321
5,680
4,312
1,207
161
20,972
9,095
n/a
375
0
2,771
0
4,446
0
0
n/a
0
606
531
896
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CDQ 3
4,731,995
3,170,000
50,400
22,000
329,000
3,080
2,060
92,200
n/a
n/a
n/a
266,000
243,000
6,760
n/a
n/a
191,000
23,600
82,100
19,500
83,800
34,300
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10,400
524
563
n/a
n/a
1,700
n/a
n/a
2,620
37,200
1,360
528
58,300
OFL
2,911,610
1,600,000
41,600
156
281,000
2,610
1,740
77,900
36,800
21,900
19,200
242,000
219,000
5,750
4,300
1,450
157,000
17,700
68,300
14,500
69,100
24,700
5,710
5,660
4,960
8,370
8,330
393
465
240
225
1,280
710
570
1,970
31,000
1,020
396
43,700
ABC
2,000,000
1,253,658
19,000
150
229,608
2,610
1,740
48,593
36,800
10,293
1,500
197,660
85,000
4,950
3,500
1,450
25,900
17,700
41,548
3,000
16,000
24,700
5,710
5,660
4,960
8,370
4,000
393
465
240
225
1,000
500
500
425
16,500
50
150
5,200
TAC
2012
1,788,157
1,128,292
17,100
150
205,040
1,109
370
43,394
32,862
9,192
1,340
176,510
75,905
4,208
2,975
1,233
22,015
15,045
37,102
2,550
13,600
21,812
4,854
5,054
4,429
7,474
3,400
334
395
204
191
850
425
425
361
14,025
43
128
4,420
ITAC 2
198,926
125,366
1,900
0
24,568
98
33
5,199
3,938
1,101
161
21,150
9,095
n/a
375
0
2,771
0
4,446
0
0
n/a
0
606
531
896
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CDQ 3
These amounts apply to the entire BSAI management area unless otherwise specified. With the exception of pollock, and for the purpose of these harvest specifications, the Bering Sea (BS) subarea includes the
Bogoslof District.
2 Except for pollock, the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line and pot gear, and Amendment 80 species, 15 percent of each TAC is put into a reserve. The ITAC for these species is the remainder
of the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
3 Under § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the incidental catch allowance (3.0 percent), is
further allocated by sector for a directed pollock fishery as follows: Inshore—50 percent; catcher/processor—40 percent; and motherships—10 percent. Under § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual Aleutian Islands subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the incidental catch allowance (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery.
4 The Pacific cod TAC is reduced by three percent from the ABC to account for the State guideline harvest level in State waters of the Aleutian Islands subarea.
5 For the Amendment 80 species (Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean perch, yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole, and Pacific cod), 10.7 percent of the TAC is reserved for use by CDQ participants (see
§§ 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31). Twenty percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line gear or pot gear, 7.5 percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to trawl gear, and 10.7 percent of the TACs for Bering
Sea Greenland turbot and arrowtooth flounder are reserved for use by CDQ participants (see § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) and (D)). Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot, ‘‘other flatfish’’, Alaska plaice, Bering Sea Pacific ocean
perch, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ‘‘other rockfish’’, octopuses, sculpins, sharks, skates, and squid are not allocated to the CDQ program.
6 ‘‘Rock sole’’ includes Lepidopsetta polyxystra (Northern rock sole) and Lepidopsetta bilineata (Southern rock sole).
7 ‘‘Flathead sole’’ includes Hippoglossoides elassodon (flathead sole) and Hippoglossoides robustus (Bering flounder).
8 ‘‘Other flatfish’’ includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole, Greenland turbot, Kamchatka flounder, rock sole, and yellowfin sole.
9 ‘‘Rougheye rockfish’’ includes Sebastes aleutianus (rougheye) and Sebastes melanostictus (blackspotted).
10 ‘‘Other rockfish’’ includes all Sebastes and Sebastolobus species except for Pacific ocean perch, northern, shortraker, and rougheye rockfish.
1
Squids ...................................
Skates ...................................
Sharks ...................................
Octopuses .............................
Sculpins .................................
Other rockfish 10 ....................
Northern rockfish ...................
Shortraker rockfish ................
Rougheye rockfish 9 ..............
Arrowtooth flounder 5 ............
Kamchatka flounder ..............
Flathead sole 5, 7 ....................
Other flatfish 8 .......................
Alaska plaice .........................
Pacific ocean perch 5 ............
Yellowfin sole 5 ......................
Rock sole 5, 6 ..........................
Greenland turbot 5 .................
Atka mackerel 5 .....................
......................................
BS 2 .............................
AI 2 ...............................
Bogoslof ......................
BSAI ............................
BS ................................
AI .................................
BSAI ............................
EAI/BS .........................
CAI ..............................
WAI ..............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BS ................................
AI .................................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BS ................................
EAI ...............................
CAI ..............................
WAI ..............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
EBS/EAI ......................
CAI/WAI .......................
BSAI ............................
BS ................................
AI .................................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
BSAI ............................
Pollock 3 ................................
Pacific cod 4, 5 ........................
Sablefish 5 .............................
Area
Species
[Amounts are in metric tons]
TABLE 1—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 OVERFISHING LEVEL (OFL), ACCEPTABLE BIOLOGICAL CATCH (ABC), TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH (TAC), INITIAL TAC (ITAC),
AND CDQ RESERVE ALLOCATION OF GROUNDFISH IN THE BSAI 1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
01MRR1
11143
11144
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Groundfish Reserves and the Incidental
Catch Allowance (ICA) for Pollock,
Atka Mackerel, Flathead Sole, Rock
Sole, Yellowfin Sole, and Aleutian
Islands Pacific Ocean Perch
Section 679.20(b)(1)(i) requires the
placement of 15 percent of the TAC for
each target species, except for pollock,
the hook-and-line and pot gear
allocation of sablefish, and the
Amendment 80 species, in a nonspecified reserve. Section
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires that 20
percent of the hook-and-line and pot
gear allocation of sablefish be allocated
to the fixed gear sablefish CDQ reserve.
Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D) requires
allocation of 7.5 percent of the trawl
gear allocations of sablefish and 10.7
percent of the Bering Sea Greenland
turbot and arrowtooth flounder TACs to
the respective CDQ reserves. Section
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) requires allocation of
10.7 percent of the TACs for Atka
mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean
perch, yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead
sole, and Pacific cod to the CDQ
reserves. Sections 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) and
679.31(a) also require the allocation of
10 percent of the BSAI pollock TACs to
the pollock CDQ directed fishing
allowance (DFA). The entire Bogoslof
District pollock TAC is allocated as an
ICA (see § 679.20(a)(5)(ii)). With the
exception of the hook-and-line and pot
gear sablefish CDQ reserve, the
regulations do not further apportion the
CDQ allocations by gear.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1),
NMFS allocates a pollock ICA of 3
percent of the BS subarea pollock TAC
after subtraction of the 10 percent CDQ
reserve. This allowance is based on
NMFS’ examination of the pollock
incidental catch, including the
incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in
target fisheries other than pollock from
1999 through 2010. During this 12-year
period, the pollock incidental catch
ranged from a low of 2.4 percent in 2006
to a high of 5 percent in 1999, with a
12-year average of 3 percent. Pursuant to
§ 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), NMFS
establishes a pollock ICA of 1,600 mt of
the AI subarea TAC after subtraction of
the 10 percent CDQ DFA. This
allowance is based on NMFS’
examination of the pollock incidental
catch, including the incidental catch by
CDQ vessels, in target fisheries other
than pollock from 2003 through 2010.
During this 8-year period, the incidental
catch of pollock ranged from a low of 5
percent in 2006 to a high of 10 percent
in 2003, with an 8-year average of 7
percent.
Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(8) and (10),
NMFS allocates ICAs of 5,000 mt of
flathead sole, 5,000 mt of rock sole,
2,000 mt of yellowfin sole, 10 mt of
Western Aleutian District Pacific (WAI)
ocean perch, 75 mt of Central Aleutian
District (CAI) Pacific ocean perch, 100
mt of Eastern Aleutian District (EAI)
Pacific ocean perch, 40 mt of WAI Atka
mackerel, 75 mt of CAI Atka mackerel,
and 75 mt of EAI and BS subarea Atka
mackerel TAC after subtraction of the
10.7 percent CDQ reserve. These
allowances are based on NMFS’
examination of the incidental catch in
other target fisheries from 2003 through
2010.
The regulations do not designate the
remainder of the non-specified reserve
by species or species group. Any
amount of the reserve may be
apportioned to a target species category
during the year, providing that such
apportionments do not result in
overfishing (see § 679.20(b)(1)(i)). The
Regional Administrator has determined
that the ITACs specified for the species
listed in Table 2 need to be
supplemented from the non-specified
reserve because U.S. fishing vessels
have demonstrated the capacity to catch
the full TAC allocations. Therefore, in
accordance with § 679.20(b)(3), NMFS is
apportioning the amounts shown in
Table 2 from the non-specified reserve
to increase the ITAC for northern
rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye
rockfish, and Bering Sea ‘‘other rockfish’’
by 15 percent of the TAC in 2011 and
2012.
TABLE 2—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 APPORTIONMENT OF RESERVES TO ITAC CATEGORIES
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Species-area or subarea
2011 ITAC
2011
reserve
amount
2011 final
ITAC
2012 ITAC
2012
reserve
amount
2012
final ITAC
Shortraker rockfish–BSAI .................................................
Rougheye rockfish–EBS/EAI ...........................................
Rougheye rockfish–CAI/WAI ...........................................
Northern rockfish–BSAI ...................................................
Other rockfish—Bering Sea subarea ...............................
334
199
187
3,400
425
59
35
33
600
75
393
234
220
4,000
500
334
204
191
3,400
425
59
36
34
600
75
393
240
225
4,000
500
Total ..........................................................................
4,545
802
5,347
4,554
804
5,358
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Allocation of Pollock TAC Under the
American Fisheries Act (AFA)
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) requires that
the pollock TAC apportioned to the BS
subarea, after subtraction of the 10
percent for the CDQ program and the 3
percent for the ICA, be allocated as a
DFA as follows: 50 percent to the
inshore sector, 40 percent to the
catcher/processor (C/P) sector, and 10
percent to the mothership sector. In the
BS subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the A season (January 20–
June 10), and 60 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the B season (June 10–
November 1) (§ 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)). The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
AI directed pollock fishery allocation to
the Aleut Corporation is the amount of
pollock remaining in the AI subarea
after subtracting 1,900 mt for the CDQ
DFA (10 percent) and 1,600 mt for the
ICA (§ 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(ii)). In the
AI subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is
allocated to the A season and the
remainder of the directed pollock
fishery is allocated to the B season.
Table 3 lists these 2011 and 2012
amounts.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4) also
includes several specific requirements
regarding BS subarea pollock
allocations. First, 8.5 percent of the
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pollock allocated to the C/P sector will
be available for harvest by AFA catcher
vessels (CVs) with C/P sector
endorsements, unless the Regional
Administrator receives a cooperative
contract that provides for the
distribution of harvest among AFA C/Ps
and AFA CVs in a manner agreed to by
all members. Second, AFA C/Ps not
listed in the AFA are limited to
harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of
the pollock allocated to the C/P sector.
Table 3 lists the 2011 and 2012
allocations of pollock TAC. Tables 11
through 16 list the AFA C/P and CV
harvesting sideboard limits. The tables
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11145
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
for the pollock allocations to the BS
subarea inshore pollock cooperatives
and open access sector will be posted on
the Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Table 3 also lists seasonal
apportionments of pollock and harvest
limits within the Steller Sea Lion
Conservation Area (SCA). The harvest
within the SCA, as defined at
§ 679.22(a)(7)(vii), is limited to 28
percent of the annual DFA until 12
noon, April 1 as provided in
§ 679.22(a)(5)(i)(C). The remaining 12
percent of the 40 percent annual DFA
allocated to the A season may be taken
outside the SCA before 12 noon, April
1 or inside the SCA after 12 noon, April
1. If less than 28 percent of the annual
DFA is taken inside the SCA before 12
noon, April 1, the remainder will be
available to be taken inside the SCA
after 12 noon, April 1. The A season
pollock SCA harvest limit will be
apportioned to each sector in proportion
to each sector’s allocated percentage of
the DFA. Table 3 lists these 2011 and
2012 amounts by sector.
TABLE 3—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 ALLOCATIONS OF POLLOCK TACS TO THE DIRECTED POLLOCK FISHERIES AND TO THE
CDQ DIRECTED FISHING ALLOWANCES (DFA)1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2011 A season 1
Area and sector
2011
Allocations
A season
DFA
2011
B season 1
SCA harvest
limit 2
B season
DFA
2012 A season 1
2012
Allocations
A season
DFA
2012
B season 1
SCA harvest
limit 2
B season
DFA
Bering Sea subarea ..........................
CDQ DFA ...................................
ICA 1 ...........................................
AFA Inshore ...............................
AFA Catcher/Processors 3 .........
Catch by C/Ps .....................
Catch by CVs 3 ...................
Unlisted C/P Limit 4 ......
AFA Motherships .......................
Excessive Harvesting Limit 5 ......
Excessive Processing Limit 6 .....
1,252,000
125,200
33,804
546,498
437,198
400,037
37,162
2,186
109,300
191,274
327,899
n/a
50,080
n/a
218,599
174,879
160,015
14,865
874
43,720
n/a
n/a
n/a
35,056
n/a
153,019
122,416
n/a
n/a
n/a
30,604
n/a
n/a
n/a
75,120
n/a
327,899
262,319
240,022
22,297
1,312
65,580
n/a
n/a
1,253,658
125,366
33,849
547,222
437,777
400,566
37,211
2,189
109,444
191,528
328,333
n/a
50,146
n/a
218,889
175,111
160,227
14,884
876
43,778
n/a
n/a
n/a
35,102
n/a
153,222
122,578
n/a
n/a
n/a
30,644
n/a
n/a
n/a
75,219
n/a
328,333
262,666
240,340
22,327
1,313
65,667
n/a
n/a
Total Bering Sea DFA .......................
1,092,996
437,198
306,039
655,798
1,094,443
437,777
306,444
656,666
Aleutian Islands subarea 1 ................
CDQ DFA ...................................
ICA .............................................
Aleut Corporation .......................
Bogoslof District ICA 7 .......................
19,000
1,900
1,600
15,500
150
n/a
760
800
15,500
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1,140
800
0
n/a
19,000
1,900
1,600
15,500
150
n/a
760
800
15,500
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1,140
800
0
n/a
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
1 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), the BS subarea pollock, after subtraction for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and the ICA (3 percent), is allocated as a DFA as follows:
inshore sector—50 percent, catcher/processor sector (C/P)—40 percent, and mothership sector—10 percent. In the BS subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is allocated to
the A season (January 20–June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the B season (June 10–November 1). Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the
annual AI pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second the ICA (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation
for a directed pollock fishery. In the AI subarea, the A season is allocated 40 percent of the ABC and the B season is allocated the remainder of the directed pollock
fishery.
2 In the BS subarea, no more than 28 percent of each sector’s annual DFA may be taken from the SCA before April 1. The remaining 12 percent of the annual DFA
allocated to the A season may be taken outside of SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If less than 28 percent of the annual DFA is taken inside the
SCA before April 1, the remainder will be available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1.
3 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4), not less than 8.5 percent of the DFA allocated to listed C/Ps shall be available for harvest only by eligible catcher vessels delivering to listed C/Ps.
4 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4)(iii), the AFA unlisted C/Ps are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of the C/Ps sector’s allocation of pollock.
5 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6), NMFS establishes an excessive harvesting share limit equal to 17.5 percent of the sum of the non-CDQ pollock DFAs.
6 Pursuant to § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7), NMFS establishes an excessive processing share limit equal to 30.0 percent of the sum of the non-CDQ pollock DFAs.
7 The Bogoslof District is closed by the final harvest specifications to directed fishing for pollock. The amounts specified are for ICA only and are not apportioned by
season or sector.
Note: Seasonal or sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
Allocation of the Atka Mackerel TACs
Section 679.20(a)(8) allocates the Atka
mackerel TACs to the Amendment 80
and BSAI trawl limited access sectors,
after subtraction of the CDQ reserves, jig
gear allocation, and ICAs for the BSAI
trawl limited access sector and nontrawl gear (Table 4). The process for
allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel
to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl
limited access sectors is listed in Table
33 to part 679 and § 679.91. Pursuant to
§ 679.20(a)(8)(i), up to 2 percent of the
EAI and the BS subarea Atka mackerel
ITAC may be allocated to jig gear. The
amount of this allocation is determined
annually by the Council based on
several criteria, including the
anticipated harvest capacity of the jig
gear fleet. The Council recommended,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
and NMFS approves, a 0.5 percent
allocation of the Atka mackerel ITAC in
the EAI and BS subarea to the jig gear
in 2011 and 2012. This percentage is
applied after subtraction of the CDQ
reserve and the ICA.
The RPA implemented on January 1,
2011, (FR 75 77535, December 13, 2010,
and 75 FR 81921, December 29, 2010),
requires that NMFS make several
changes from the proposed to the final
harvest specifications for BSAI Atka
mackerel. The platoon management of
Atka mackerel harvest inside the harvest
limit area is no longer needed because
the RPA prohibits all retention of Atka
mackerel in Area 543 and requires that
nearly all directed fishing for Atka
mackerel in waters 0 nm to 20 nm
around Steller sea lion sites in Area 542.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The harvest limit area limits that were
in the proposed harvest specification
therefore have been removed from the
final harvest specifications in Areas 542
and 543. The TACs in these two areas,
which were set to ABC, decreased from
the proposed amounts. In area 543, the
final amount is set to account for
discards in other fisheries since the RPA
at § 679.7(a)(19) prohibits retention in
Area 543. Also the final Area 542 TAC
decreased from the proposed TAC since
the RPA at § 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C)(3) limits
the annual TAC for this area to no more
than 47 percent of the Area 542 ABC.
Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) apportions
the Atka mackerel ITAC into two equal
seasonal allowances. The RPA changed
the end of the A season and start of the
B season dates at § 679.23(e)(3). The first
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11146
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
seasonal allowance is made available for
directed fishing with trawl gear from
January 20 to June 10 (A season), and
the second seasonal allowance is made
available from June to November 1 (B
season). Also, § 679.23(e)(4)(iii) the RPA
applies Atka mackerel seasons to CDQ
Atka mackerel fishing. The jig gear
allocation is not apportioned by season.
Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C)(ii)(2)
requires the Amendment 80
cooperatives and CDQ groups to limit
harvest to 10 percent of their Central
Aleutian District Atka mackerel
allocation equally divided between the
A and B seasons within waters 10 nm
to 20 nm of Gramp Rock and Tag Island,
as described on Table 12 to part 679.
Vessels not fishing under the authority
of an Amendment 80 cooperative quota
or CDQ allocation are prohibited from
conducting directed fishing for Atka
mackerel inside Steller sea lion critical
habitat in the Central Aleutian District.
Table 4 lists these 2011 and 2012 Atka
mackerel season and area allowances, as
well as the sector allocations. The 2012
allocations for Atka mackerel between
Amendment 80 cooperatives and the
Amendment 80 limited access sector
will not be known until eligible
participants apply for participation in
the program by November 1, 2011.
TABLE 4—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 SEASONAL AND SPATIAL ALLOWANCES, GEAR SHARES, CDQ RESERVE, INCIDENTAL
CATCH ALLOWANCE, AND AMENDMENT 80 ALLOCATIONS OF THE BSAI ATKA MACKEREL TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2011 allocation by area
Eastern
Aleutian
District/Bering Sea
Sector 1
Season 2, 3, 4
TAC ...........................................
CDQ reserve .............................
n/a ............................
Total .........................
A ...............................
Critical habitat 5 ........
B ...............................
Critical habitat 5 ........
Total .........................
Total .........................
Total .........................
A ...............................
B ...............................
Total .........................
A ...............................
B ...............................
Total .........................
A ...............................
Critical habitat 5 ........
B ...............................
Critical habitat 5 ........
Total .........................
A ...............................
Critical habitat 5 ........
B ...............................
Critical habitat 5 ........
ICA .............................................
Jig 6 ............................................
BSAI trawl limited access ..........
Amendment 80 sectors .............
Alaska Groundfish Cooperative
Alaska Seafood Cooperative .....
40,300
4,312
2,156
n/a
2,156
n/a
75
180
2,859
1,429
1,429
32,875
16,437
16,437
19,181
9,591
n/a
9,591
n/a
13,694
6,847
n/a
6,847
n/a
Central
Aleutian
District 5
2012 allocation by area
Western
Aleutian
District
11,280
1,207
603
60
603
60
75
0
800
400
400
9,198
4,599
4,599
5,389
2,695
269
2,695
269
3,809
1,904
190
1,904
190
Eastern
Aleutian
District/Bering Sea
1,500
161
80
n/a
80
n/a
40
0
0
0
0
1,300
650
650
755
377
n/a
377
n/a
545
272
n/a
272
n/a
36,800
3,938
1,969
n/a
1,969
n/a
75
164
3,262
1,631
1,631
29,361
14,681
14,681
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Central
Aleutian
District 5
10,293
1,101
551
55
551
55
75
0
912
456
456
8,205
4,102
4,102
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Western
Aleutian
District
1,500
161
80
n/a
80
n/a
40
0
0
0
0
1,300
650
650
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1 Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii) allocates the Atka mackerel TACs, after subtraction of the CDQ reserves, jig gear allocation, and ICAs to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors. The allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors is established in Table 33 to part 679 and § 679.91. The CDQ reserve is 10.7 percent of the TAC for use by CDQ participants (see
§§ 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31).
2 Sections 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) and 679.22(a) establish temporal and spatial limitations for the Atka mackerel fishery.
3 The seasonal allowances of Atka mackerel are 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season.
4 Section 679.23(e)(3) authorizes directed fishing for Atka mackerel with trawl gear during the A season from January 20 to June 10 and the B
season from June 10 to November 1.
5 Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C) requires the TAC in area 542 shall be no more than 47% of ABC, and Atka mackerel harvests for Amendment 80
cooperatives and CDQ groups within waters 10 nm to 20 nm of Gramp Rock and Tag Island, as described Table 12 to part 679, in Area 542 are
limited to no more than 10 percent of the Amendment 80 cooperative Atka mackerel allocation or 10 percent of the CDQ Atka mackerel allocation.
6 Section 679.20(a)(8)(i) requires that up to 2 percent of the Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea TAC be allocated to jig gear
after subtraction of the CDQ reserve and ICA. The amount of this allocation is 0.5 percent. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by season.
Note: Seasonal or sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Allocation of the Pacific Cod ITAC
Section 679.20(a)(7)(i) and (ii)
allocates the Pacific cod TAC in the
BSAI, after subtraction of 10.7 percent
for the CDQ reserve, as follows: 1.4
percent to vessels using jig gear; 2.0
percent to hook-and-line and pot CVs
less than 60 ft (18.3 m) length overall
(LOA); 0.2 percent to hook-and-line CVs
greater than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
LOA; 48.7 percent to hook-and-line
C/P; 8.4 percent to pot CVs greater than
or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA; 1.5
percent to pot C/Ps; 2.3 percent to AFA
trawl C/Ps; 13.4 percent to non-AFA
trawl C/Ps; and 22.1 percent to trawl
CVs. The ICA for the hook-and-line and
pot sectors will be deducted from the
aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC
allocated to the hook-and-line and pot
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sectors. For 2011 and 2012, the Regional
Administrator establishes an ICA of 500
mt based on anticipated incidental catch
by these sectors in other fisheries. The
allocation of the ITAC for Pacific cod to
the Amendment 80 sector is established
in Table 33 to part 679 and § 679.91.
The 2012 allocations for Pacific cod
between Amendment 80 cooperatives
and the Amendment 80 limited access
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
sector will not be known until
November 1, 2011, the date by which
the applicants eligible to apply for
participation in the Amendment 80
program must file their application.
Amendment 80 applications for 2012
have not yet been submitted to NMFS,
thereby preventing NMFS from
calculating 2012 allocations. NMFS will
post 2012 Amendment 80 allocations
when they become available in
December 2011.
The Pacific cod ITAC is apportioned
into seasonal allowances to disperse the
Pacific cod fisheries over the fishing
year (see §§ 679.20(a)(7) and
679.23(e)(5)). In accordance with
§ 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B) and (C), any unused
portion of a seasonal Pacific cod
allowance will become available at the
beginning of the next seasonal
allowance.
The CDQ and non-CDQ season
allowances by gear based on the 2011
and 2012 Pacific cod TACs are listed in
Tables 5a and 5b based on the sector
allocation percentages of Pacific cod set
forth at §§ 679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) and
11147
679.20(a)(7)(iv)(A); and the seasonal
allowances of Pacific cod set forth at
§ 679.23(e)(5).
The RPA implemented on January 1,
2011 (75 FR 77535, December 13, 2010),
includes two prohibitions for Pacific
cod. Section 679.7(a)(19) prohibits
retention of Pacific cod in Area 543 and
§ 679.7(a)(23) prohibits directed fishing
for Pacific cod with hook-and-line, pot,
or jig gear in the Aleutian Islands
subarea November 1 through December
31.
TABLE 5a—FINAL 2011 GEAR SHARES AND SEASONAL ALLOWANCES OF THE BSAI PACIFIC COD TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Gear sector
Share of gear
sector total
Percent
Seasonal apportionment
Share of
sector total
Dates
Total TAC ..........................................
CDQ ..................................................
Total hook-and-line/pot gear .............
Hook-and-line/pot ICA 1 ....................
Hook-and-line/pot sub-total ...............
Hook-and-line catcher/processor ......
100
10.7
60.8
n/a
n/a
48.7
227,950
24,391
123,764
500
123,264
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
98,733
Hook-and-line catcher vessel ≥ 60 ft
LOA.
0.2
n/a
405
Pot catcher/processor .......................
1.5
n/a
3,041
Pot catcher vessel ≥ 60 ft LOA ........
8.4
n/a
17,030
Catcher vessel < 60 ft LOA using
hook-and-line or pot gear.
Trawl catcher vessel .........................
2
n/a
4,055
22.1
44,987
n/a
AFA trawl catcher/processor .............
2.3
4,682
n/a
Amendment 80 ..................................
13.4
27,277
n/a
Alaska Groundfish Cooperative ........
n/a
n/a
5,079
Alaska Seafood Cooperative ............
n/a
n/a
22,198
Jig ......................................................
1.4
2,850
n/a
n/a
see
n/a
see
n/a
Jan
Jun
Jan
Amount
....................................................
§ 679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) ....................
....................................................
§ 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(B) ...................
....................................................
1–Jun 10 ...................................
10–Dec 31 .................................
1–Jun 10 ...................................
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
50,354
48,379
207
Jun 10–Dec 31 .................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ...................................
Sept 1–Dec 31 .................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ...................................
Sept 1–Dec 31 .................................
n/a ....................................................
199
1,551
1,490
8,685
8,345
n/a
Jan 20–Apr 1 ....................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ....................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...................................
Jan 20–Apr 1 ....................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ....................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...................................
Jan 20–Apr 1 ....................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ....................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...................................
Jan 20–Apr 1 ....................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ....................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...................................
Jan 20–Apr 1 ....................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ....................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...................................
Jan 1–Apr 30 ....................................
Apr 30–Aug 31 .................................
Aug 31–Dec 31 ................................
33,290
4,949
6,748
3,511
1,170
0
20,458
6,819
0
3,809
1,270
0
16,649
5,550
0
1,710
570
570
1 The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot sectors will be deducted from the aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC allocated to the hook-and-line
and pot sectors. The Regional Administrator approves an ICA of 500 mt based on anticipated incidental catch in these fisheries.
Note: Seasonal or sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
TABLE 5b—FINAL 2012 GEAR SHARES AND SEASONAL ALLOWANCES OF THE BSAI PACIFIC COD TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Gear sector
Total TAC ..............................................................
CDQ ......................................................................
Total hook-and-line/pot gear .................................
Hook-and-line/pot ICA 1 ........................................
Hook-and-line/pot sub-total ...................................
Hook-and-line catcher/processor ..........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Feb 28, 2011
Share of gear
sector total
Percent
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
100
10.7
60.8
n/a
n/a
48.7
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
229,608
24,568
124,664
500
124,164
n/a
Sfmt 4700
Seasonal apportionment 2 3
Share of
sector total
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
99,454
Dates
n/a .................................
see § 679.20(a)(7)(i)(B)
n/a .................................
see § 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(B)
n/a .................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Dec 31 .............
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Amount
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
50,722
48,732
11148
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 5b—FINAL 2012 GEAR SHARES AND SEASONAL ALLOWANCES OF THE BSAI PACIFIC COD TAC—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Gear sector
Share of gear
sector total
Percent
Seasonal apportionment 2 3
Share of
sector total
Hook-and-line catcher vessel ≥ 60 ft LOA ...........
0.2
n/a
408
Pot catcher/processor ...........................................
1.5
n/a
3,063
Pot catcher vessel ≥ 60 ft LOA ............................
8.4
n/a
17,154
Catcher vessel < 60 ft LOA using hook-and-line
or pot gear.
Trawl catcher vessel .............................................
2
n/a
4,084
22.1
45,314
n/a
AFA trawl catcher/processor ................................
2.3
4,716
n/a
Amendment 80 .....................................................
13.4
27,475
n/a
Amendment 80 limited access 2 ...........................
n/a
n/a
see footnote 2
Amendment 80 cooperatives 2 ..............................
n/a
n/a
see footnote 2
Jig .........................................................................
1.4
2,871
n/a
Dates
Amount
Jan 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Dec 31 .............
Jan 1–Jun 10 ................
Sept 1–Dec 31 .............
Jan 1–Jun 10 ................
Sept 1–Dec 31 .............
n/a .................................
208
200
1,562
1,501
8,749
8,406
n/a
Jan 20–Apr 1 ................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...............
Jan 20–Apr 1 ................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...............
Jan 20–Apr 1 ................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...............
Jan 20–Apr 1 ................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...............
Jan 20–Apr 1 ................
Apr 1–Jun 10 ................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ...............
Jan 1–Apr 30 ................
Apr 30–Aug 31 .............
Aug 31–Dec 31 ............
33,532
4,985
6,797
3,537
1,179
0
20,607
6,869
0
75%
25%
0
75%
25%
0
1,722
574
574
1 The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot sectors will be deducted from the aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC allocated to the hook-and-line
and pot sectors. The Regional Administrator approves an ICA of 500 mt based on anticipated incidental catch in these fisheries.
2 The 2012 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector will not
be known November 1, 2011, the date by which the applicants eligible to apply for participation in the Amendment 80 program must file their application.
Note: Seasonal or sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
Sablefish Gear Allocation
Sections 679.20(a)(4)(iii) and (iv)
require the allocation of sablefish TACs
for the BS and AI subareas between
trawl and hook-and-line or pot gear.
Gear allocations of the TACs for the BS
subarea are 50 percent for trawl gear and
50 percent for hook-and-line or pot gear.
Gear allocations of the TACs for the AI
subarea are 25 percent for trawl gear and
75 percent for hook-and-line or pot gear.
Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires
apportionment of 20 percent of the
hook-and-line and pot gear allocation of
sablefish to the CDQ reserve.
Additionally, § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D)
requires apportionment of 7.5 percent of
the trawl gear allocation of sablefish
from the nonspecified reserves,
established under § 679.20(b)(1)(i), to
the CDQ reserve. The Council
recommended that only trawl sablefish
TAC be established biennially. This is
because the harvest specifications for
the hook-and-line gear and pot gear
sablefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ)
fisheries will be limited to the 2011
fishing year to ensure those fisheries are
conducted concurrently with the halibut
IFQ fishery. Concurrent sablefish and
halibut IFQ fisheries reduce the
potential for discards of halibut and
sablefish in those fisheries. The
sablefish IFQ fisheries will remain
closed at the beginning of each fishing
year until the final specifications for the
sablefish IFQ fisheries are in effect.
Table 6 lists the 2011 and 2012 gear
allocations of the sablefish TAC and
CDQ reserve amounts.
TABLE 6—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 GEAR SHARES AND CDQ RESERVE OF BSAI SABLEFISH TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Percent of
TAC
Subarea and gear
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Bering Sea:
Trawl 1 ...............................................
Hook-and-line/pot gear 2 ...................
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
2011 ITAC
2011 CDQ
reserve
2012 Share
of TAC
2012 ITAC
2012 CDQ
reserve
50
50
1,211
1,140
107
285
1,305
n/a
1,109
n/a
98
n/a
2,850
2,351
392
1,305
1,109
98
25
75
PO 00000
1,425
1,425
100
Total ...........................................
Aleutian Islands:
Trawl 1 ...............................................
Hook-and-line/pot gear 2 ...................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
2011 Share
of TAC
475
1,425
404
1,140
36
285
435
n/a
370
n/a
33
n/a
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11149
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 6—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 GEAR SHARES AND CDQ RESERVE OF BSAI SABLEFISH TACS—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Percent of
TAC
Subarea and gear
Total ...........................................
2011 Share
of TAC
100
1,900
2011 ITAC
2011 CDQ
reserve
1,544
2012 Share
of TAC
321
2012 CDQ
reserve
2012 ITAC
435
370
33
1 Except
for the sablefish hook-and-line or pot gear allocation, 15 percent of TAC is apportioned to the reserve. The ITAC is the remainder of
the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
2 For the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to vessels using hook-and-line or pot gear, 20 percent of the allocated TAC is reserved for use
by CDQ participants. The Council recommended that specifications for the hook-and-line gear sablefish IFQ fisheries be limited to one year.
Allocation of the AI Pacific Ocean
Perch, and BSAI Flathead Sole, Rock
Sole, and Yellowfin Sole TACs
Sections 679.20(a)(10)(i) and (ii)
require the allocation between the
Amendment 80 sector and BSAI trawl
limited access sector for AI Pacific
ocean perch, and BSAI flathead sole,
rock sole, and yellowfin sole TACs, after
subtraction of 10.7 percent for the CDQ
reserve and an ICA for the BSAI trawl
limited access sector and vessels using
non-trawl gear. The allocation of the
ITAC for AI Pacific ocean perch, and
BSAI flathead sole, rock sole, and
yellowfin sole to the Amendment 80
sector is established in accordance with
Tables 33 and 34 to part 679 and
§ 679.91. The 2012 allocations for
Amendment 80 species between
Amendment 80 cooperatives and
limited access sector will not be known
until November 1, 2011, the date by
which the applicants eligible to apply
for participation in the Amendment 80
program must file their application.
Amendment 80 applications for 2012
have not yet been submitted to NMFS,
thereby preventing NMFS from
calculating 2012 allocations. NMFS will
post 2012 Amendment 80 allocations
when they become available in
December, 2011. Table 7a and 7b lists
the 2011 and 2012 allocations of the AI
Pacific ocean perch, and BSAI flathead
sole, rock sole, and yellowfin sole TACs.
TABLE 7a—FINAL 2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT QUOTA (CDQ) RESERVES, INCIDENTAL CATCH AMOUNTS (ICAS), AND
AMENDMENT 80 ALLOCATIONS OF THE ALEUTIAN ISLANDS PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH, AND BSAI FLATHEAD SOLE, ROCK
SOLE, AND YELLOWFIN SOLE TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Pacific ocean perch
Sector
Eastern Aleutian District
TAC ..............................................
CDQ .............................................
ICA ...............................................
BSAI trawl limited access ............
Amendment 80 .............................
Alaska Groundfish Cooperative ...
Alaska Seafood Cooperative .......
Central Aleutian
District
5,660
606
100
495
4,459
2,364
2,095
Flathead sole
Rock sole
Yellowfin sole
BSAI
BSAI
BSAI
Western Aleutian District
4,960
531
75
435
3,919
2,078
1,841
8,370
896
10
149
7,315
3,879
3,436
41,548
4,446
5,000
0
32,102
6,269
25,833
85,000
9,095
5,000
0
70,905
19,902
51,003
196,000
20,972
2,000
34,153
138,875
58,948
79,926
Note: Sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
TABLE 7b—FINAL 2012 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT QUOTA (CDQ) RESERVES, INCIDENTAL CATCH AMOUNTS (ICAS), AND
AMENDMENT 80 ALLOCATIONS OF THE ALEUTIAN ISLANDS PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH, AND BSAI FLATHEAD SOLE, ROCK
SOLE, AND YELLOWFIN SOLE TACS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Pacific ocean perch
Sector
Eastern Aleutian District
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
TAC ..............................................
CDQ .............................................
ICA ...............................................
BSAI trawl limited access ............
Amendment 80 1 ..........................
Central Aleutian
District
5,660
606
100
495
4,459
Flathead sole
Rock sole
Yellowfin sole
BSAI
BSAI
BSAI
Western Aleutian District
4,960
531
75
435
3,919
8,370
896
10
149
7,315
41,548
4,446
5,000
0
32,102
85,000
9,095
5,000
0
70,905
197,660
21,150
2,000
34,746
139,764
1 The 2012 allocations for Amendment 80 species between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80 limited access sector will not
be known until November 1, 2011, the date by which the applicants eligible to apply for participation in the Amendment 80 program must file
their application.
Note: Sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
Allocation of PSC Limits for Halibut,
Salmon, Crab, and Herring
Section 679.21(e) sets forth the BSAI
PSC limits. Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(iv)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
and (e)(2), the 2011 and 2012 BSAI
halibut mortality limits are 3,675 mt for
trawl fisheries and 900 mt for the nontrawl fisheries. Sections
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(2) and (e)(4)(i)(A)
allocate 326 mt of the trawl halibut
mortality limit and 7.5 percent, or 67
mt, of the non-trawl halibut mortality
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
11150
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
limit as the PSQ reserve for use by the
groundfish CDQ program.
Section 679.21(e)(4)(i) authorizes the
apportionment of the non-trawl halibut
PSC limit into PSC bycatch allowances
among six fishery categories. Table 8c
lists the fishery bycatch allowances for
the trawl and non-trawl fisheries.
Pursuant to section 3.6 of the BSAI
FMP, the Council recommends, and
NMFS agrees, that certain specified nontrawl fisheries be exempt from the
halibut PSC limit. As in past years after
consultation with the Council, NMFS
exempts pot gear, jig gear, and the
sablefish IFQ hook-and-line gear fishery
categories from halibut bycatch
restrictions for the following reasons: (1)
The pot gear fisheries have low halibut
bycatch mortality; (2) NMFS estimates
halibut mortality for the jig gear fleet to
be negligible because of the small size
of the fishery and the selectivity of the
gear; and (3) the sablefish and halibut
IFQ fisheries have low halibut bycatch
mortality because the IFQ program
requires legal-size halibut to be retained
by vessels using hook-and-line gear if a
halibut IFQ permit holder or a hired
master is aboard and is holding unused
halibut IFQ (subpart D of 50 CFR part
679). In 2010, total groundfish catch for
the pot gear fishery in the BSAI was
approximately 23,028 mt, with an
associated halibut bycatch mortality of
about 4 mt.
The 2010 jig gear fishery harvested
about 344 mt of groundfish. Most
vessels in the jig gear fleet are less than
60 ft (18.3 m) LOA and thus are exempt
from observer coverage requirements.
As a result, observer data are not
available on halibut bycatch in the jig
gear fishery. However, as mentioned
above, NMFS estimates a negligible
amount of halibut bycatch mortality
because of the selective nature of jig
gear and the low mortality rate of
halibut caught with jig gear and
released.
In January 2011, NMFS implemented
Amendment 91 to the FMP,
§ 679.21(f)(2), to annually allocate
portions of either 47,591 or 60,000
Chinook salmon PSC among the AFA
sectors depending upon past catch
performance and upon whether or not
Chinook salmon bycatch incentive plan
agreements are formed. If an AFA sector
participates in an approved Chinook
salmon bycatch incentive plan
agreement, then NMFS will allocate a
portion of the 60,000 PSC limit to that
sector as specified in
§ 679.21(f)(3)(iii)(A). If no Chinook
salmon bycatch incentive plan
agreement is approved, or if the sector
has exceeded its performance standard
under § 679.21(f)(6), NMFS will allocate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
a portion of the 47,591 Chinook salmon
PSC limit to that sector as specified in
§ 679.21(f)(3)(iii)(B). In 2011, the
Chinook salmon PSC limit is 60,000 and
the AFA sector Chinook salmon
allocations are seasonally allocated with
70 percent of the allocation for the A
season pollock fishery, and 30 percent
of the allocation for the B season
pollock fishery as stated in
§ 679.21(f)(3)(iii)(A). The basis for these
PSC limits is described in detail in the
final rule implementing management
measures for Amendment 91 (75 FR
53026, August 30, 2010). NMFS
publishes the approved Chinook salmon
bycatch incentive plan agreements, 2011
allocations and reports at: https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/
sustainablefisheries/bycatch/
default.htm.
Section 679.21(e)(1)(viii) specifies 700
fish as the 2011 and 2012 Chinook
salmon PSC limit for the AI subarea
pollock fishery. Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i) allocates 7.5
percent, or 53 Chinook salmon, as the
AI subarea PSQ for the CDQ program
and allocates the remaining 647
Chinook salmon to the non-CDQ
fisheries.
Section 679.21(e)(1)(vii) specifies
42,000 fish as the 2011 and 2012 nonChinook salmon PSC limit. Section
679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(ii) allocates 10.7
percent, or 4,494 non-Chinook salmon,
as the PSQ for the CDQ program and
allocates the remaining 37,506 nonChinook salmon to the non-CDQ
fisheries.
PSC limits for crab and herring are
specified annually based on abundance
and spawning biomass. Pursuant to
§ 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(1), 10.7 percent from
each trawl gear PSC limit specified for
crab is allocated as a PSQ reserve for use
by the groundfish CDQ program.
Based on the 2010 survey data, the
red king crab mature female abundance
is estimated at 31.5 million red king
crabs, and the effective spawning
biomass is estimated at 67.4 million lb.
Based on the criteria set out at
§ 679.21(e)(1)(i), the 2011 and 2012 PSC
limit of red king crab in Zone 1 for trawl
gear is 197,000 animals. This limit
derives from the mature female
abundance of more than 8.4 million
king crab and the effective spawning
biomass estimate of more than 55
million lb (24,948 mt).
Section 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)(2)
establishes criteria under which NMFS
must specify an annual red king crab
bycatch limit for the Red King Crab
Savings Subarea (RKCSS). The
regulations limit the RKCSS to up to 25
percent of the red king crab PSC limit
based on the need to optimize the
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
groundfish harvest relative to red king
crab bycatch. In December 2010, the
Council recommended that the red king
crab bycatch limit be equal to 25 percent
of the red king crab PSC limit within the
RKCSS (Table 8b). NMFS concurs in the
Council’s recommendation.
Based on 2010 survey data, Tanner
crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) abundance is
estimated at 379 million animals.
Pursuant to criteria set out at
§ 679.21(e)(1)(ii), the calculated 2011
and 2012 C. bairdi crab PSC limit for
trawl gear is 830,000 animals in Zone 1
and 2,520,000 animals in Zone 2. These
limits are derived from the C. bairdi
crab abundance estimate being in excess
of the 270 million animals for the Zone
1 allocation and 290 million animals for
the Zone 2 allocation, but less than 400
million animals for both Zone
allocations.
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(iii), the PSC
limit for snow crab (C. opilio) is based
on total abundance as indicated by the
NMFS annual bottom trawl survey. The
C. opilio crab PSC limit is set at 0.1133
percent of the BS abundance index
minus 150,000 crab if left unadjusted.
However, if the abundance is less than
4.5 million animals, the minimum PSC
limit will be 4,350,000 animals pursuant
to § 679.21(e)(1)(iii)(A) and (B). Based
on the 2010 survey estimate of 7.467
billion animals, the calculated limit is
8,310,480 animals.
Pursuant to § 679.21(e)(1)(v), the PSC
limit of Pacific herring caught while
conducting any trawl operation for BSAI
groundfish is 1 percent of the annual
eastern BS herring biomass. The best
estimate of 2011 and 2012 herring
biomass is 227,269 mt. This amount was
derived using 2010 survey data and an
age-structured biomass projection model
developed by the Alaska Department of
Fish and Game. Therefore, the herring
PSC limit for 2011 and 2012 is 2,273 mt
for all trawl gear as presented in Tables
8a and b.
Section 679.21(e)(3)(A) requires PSQ
reserves to be subtracted from the total
trawl PSC limits. The amounts of 2011
PSC limits assigned to the Amendment
80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors
are specified in Table 35 to part 679.
The resulting allocation of PSC limit to
CDQ PSQ, the Amendment 80 sector,
and the BSAI trawl limited access
fisheries are listed in Table 8a. Pursuant
to § 679.21(e)(1)(iv) and § 679.91(d)
through (f), crab and halibut trawl PSC
limits assigned to the Amendment 80
sector are then further allocated to
Amendment 80 cooperatives as PSC
cooperative quota (CQ) as listed in Table
8d. PSC CQ assigned to Amendment 80
cooperatives is not allocated to specific
fishery categories. In 2011, there are no
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11151
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
vessels in the Amendment 80 limited
access sector. NMFS will not know the
2012 PSC allocations between
Amendment 80 cooperatives and the
Amendment 80 limited access sector
until November 1, 2011, the date by
which the applicants eligible to apply
for participation in the Amendment 80
program must file their application.
Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(B) requires the
apportionment of each trawl PSC limit
not assigned to Amendment 80
cooperatives into PSC bycatch
allowances for seven specified fishery
categories.
Section 679.21(e)(5) authorizes
NMFS, after consultation with the
Council, to establish seasonal
apportionments of PSC amounts for the
BSAI trawl limited access and
Amendment 80 limited access sectors in
order to maximize the ability of the fleet
to harvest the available groundfish TAC
and to minimize bycatch. The factors to
be considered are (1) Seasonal
distribution of prohibited species; (2)
seasonal distribution of target
groundfish species; (3) PSC bycatch
needs on a seasonal basis relevant to
prohibited species biomass; (4) expected
variations in bycatch rates throughout
the year; (5) expected start of fishing
effort; and (6) economic effects of
seasonal PSC apportionments on
industry sectors. The Council
recommended and NMFS approves the
seasonal PSC apportionments in Table
8c to maximize harvest among gear
types, fisheries, and seasons while
minimizing bycatch of PSC based on the
above criteria.
TABLE 8a—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 APPORTIONMENT OF PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH ALLOWANCES TO NON-TRAWL GEAR,
THE CDQ PROGRAM, AMENDMENT 80, AND THE BSAI TRAWL LIMITED ACCESS SECTORS
Non-trawl
PSC remaining
after CDQ
PSQ 1
Total nontrawl PSC
PSC species
Halibut mortality (mt) BSAI ...............................
Herring (mt) BSAI ..............................................
Red king crab (animals) Zone 1 2 .....................
C. opilio (animals) COBLZ 2 ..............................
C. bairdi crab (animals) Zone 1 2 ......................
C. bairdi crab (animals) Zone 2 2 ......................
900
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Trawl PSC
remaining
after CDQ
PSQ 1
Total trawl
PSC
832
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3,675
2,273
197,000
8,310,480
830,000
2,520,000
3,349
n/a
175,921
7,421,259
741,190
2,250,360
Amendment 80 sector
CDQ PSQ
reserve 1
2011
393
n/a
21,079
889,221
88,810
269,640
BSAI trawl
limited access fishery
2012
2,375
n/a
93,432
3,875,381
331,608
565,966
2,325
n/a
87,925
3,647,549
312,115
532,660
875
n/a
53,797
2,385,193
348,285
1,053,394
1 Section 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(2) allocates 326 mt of the trawl halibut mortality limit and § 679.21(e)(4)(i)(A) allocates 7.5 percent, or 67 mt, of the non-trawl halibut
mortality limit as the PSQ reserve for use by the groundfish CDQ program. The PSQ reserve for crab species is 10.7 percent of each crab PSC limit.
2 Refer to § 679.2 for definitions of zones.
Note: Sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
TABLE 8b—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 HERRING AND RED KING CRAB SAVINGS SUBAREA PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH
ALLOWANCES FOR ALL TRAWL SECTORS
Herring (mt)
BSAI
Fishery categories
Red king crab
(animals) Zone
1
Yellowfin sole .......................................................................................................................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 1 ................................................................................................................
Turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish 2 ...............................................................................................................................
Rockfish ...............................................................................................................................................................
Pacific cod ...........................................................................................................................................................
Midwater trawl pollock .........................................................................................................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species 3, 4 ..............................................................................................................
Red king crab savings subarea non-pelagic trawl gear 5 ....................................................................................
195
33
16
12
33
1,737
247
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
49,250
Total trawl PSC ............................................................................................................................................
2,273
197,000
1 ‘‘Other
flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole,
Greenland turbot, Kamchatka flounder, rock sole, and yellowfin sole.
2 ‘‘Arrowtooth flounder’’ for PSC monitoring includes Kamchatka flounder.
3 Pollock other than pelagic trawl pollock, Atka mackerel, and ‘‘other species’’ fishery category.
4 ‘‘Other species’’ for PSC monitoring includes octopuses, sculpins, sharks, and skates.
5 In December 2010, the Council recommended that the red king crab bycatch limit for non-pelagic trawl fisheries within the RKCSS be limited
to 25 percent of the red king crab PSC allowance (see § 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(B)(2)).
TABLE 8c—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 PROHIBITED SPECIES BYCATCH ALLOWANCES FOR THE BSAI TRAWL LIMITED ACCESS
SECTOR AND NON-TRAWL FISHERIES
Prohibited species and area 1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
BSAI trawl limited access fisheries
Halibut mortality (mt)
BSAI
Yellowfin sole ...................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 2 .............
Turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish 3 ...........................
Rockfish April 15–December 31 ......................
Pacific cod ........................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species 4 .............
Total BSAI trawl limited access PSC ..............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Red king crab
(animals)
Zone 1
167
0
0
5
453
250
875
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
47,397
0
0
0
6,000
400
53,797
Sfmt 4700
C. opilio
(animals)
COBLZ
C. bairdi (animals)
Zone 1
2,247,640
0
0
3,821
95,523
38,209
2,385,193
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
293,234
0
0
0
50,816
4,235
348,285
Zone 2
1,005,879
0
0
849
42,424
4,242
1,053,394
11152
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Non-trawl fisheries
Catcher/
processor
Pacific cod—Total .........................................
January 1–June 10 .......................................
June 10–August 15 ......................................
August 15–December 31 ..............................
Catcher
vessel
760
455
190
115
Other non-trawl—Total .................................
May 1—December 31 ..................................
Groundfish pot and jig ..................................
Sablefish hook-and-line ................................
Total non-trawl PSC .....................................
15
10
3
2
58
58
Exempt
Exempt
833
1 Refer
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock
sole, yellowfin sole, Kamchatka flounder, and arrowtooth flounder.
3 Arrowtooth flounder for PSC monitoring includes Kamchatka flounder.
4 ‘‘Other species’’ for PSC monitoring includes octopuses, sculpins, sharks, and skates.
2 ‘‘Other
TABLE 8d–FINAL 2011 PROHIBITED SPECIES BYCATCH ALLOWANCE FOR THE BSAI AMENDMENT 80 COOPERATIVES
Prohibited species and zones 1
Cooperative
Halibut mortality
(mt) BSAI
Alaska Seafood Cooperative .................................
Alaska Groundfish Cooperative .............................
Red king crab
(animals)
Zone 1
1,643
732
C. opilio (animals) COBLZ
63,631
29,801
2,502,043
1,373,339
C. bairdi (animals)
Zone 1
233,442
98,167
Zone 2
390,500
175,465
1 Refer
to § 679.2 for definitions of zones.
Note: Sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
Halibut Discard Mortality Rates (DMR)
To monitor halibut bycatch mortality
allowances and apportionments, the
Regional Administrator uses observed
halibut bycatch rates, DMRs, and
estimates of groundfish catch to project
when a fishery’s halibut bycatch
mortality allowance or seasonal
apportionment is reached. The DMRs
are based on the best information
available, including information
contained in the annual SAFE report.
NMFS approves the halibut DMRs
developed and recommended by the
IPHC and the Council for the 2011 and
2012 BSAI groundfish fisheries for use
in monitoring the 2011 and 2012 halibut
bycatch allowances (see Tables 8a–d).
The IPHC developed these DMRs for the
2010 and 2012 BSAI fisheries using the
10-year mean DMRs for those fisheries.
The IPHC will analyze observer data
annually and recommend changes to the
DMRs when a fishery DMR shows large
variation from the mean. The document
justifying these DMRs is available in
Appendix 2 in the final 2010 SAFE
report dated November 2010 (see
ADDRESSES). Table 9 lists the 2011 and
2012 DMRs.
TABLE 9—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 PACIFIC HALIBUT DISCARD MORTALITY RATES FOR THE BSAI
Halibut
discard
mortality
rate
(percent)
Gear
Fishery 1
Non-CDQ hook-and-line ...............................................................
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................
Other species ...............................................................................
Pacific cod ....................................................................................
Rockfish ........................................................................................
Arrowtooth flounder ......................................................................
Atka mackerel ...............................................................................
Flathead sole ................................................................................
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................
Non-pelagic pollock ......................................................................
Pelagic pollock ..............................................................................
Other flatfish .................................................................................
Other species ...............................................................................
Pacific cod ....................................................................................
Rockfish ........................................................................................
Rock sole ......................................................................................
Sablefish .......................................................................................
Yellowfin sole ................................................................................
Other species 2 .............................................................................
Pacific cod ....................................................................................
Atka mackerel ...............................................................................
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................
Flathead sole ................................................................................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Non-CDQ trawl .............................................................................
Non-CDQ Pot ...............................................................................
CDQ trawl .....................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11
10
10
9
76
76
74
67
73
89
72
71
71
81
82
75
81
8
8
85
88
84
11153
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 9—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 PACIFIC HALIBUT DISCARD MORTALITY RATES FOR THE BSAI—Continued
Halibut
discard
mortality
rate
(percent)
Fishery 1
Gear
CDQ hook-and-line .......................................................................
CDQ pot ........................................................................................
Non-pelagic pollock ......................................................................
Pacific cod ....................................................................................
Pelagic pollock ..............................................................................
Rockfish ........................................................................................
Rock sole ......................................................................................
Yellowfin sole ................................................................................
Greenland turbot ...........................................................................
Pacific cod ....................................................................................
Pacific cod ....................................................................................
Sablefish .......................................................................................
85
90
90
84
87
85
4
10
8
32
1 Arrowtooth
2 ‘‘Other
flounder includes Kamchatka flounder.
species’’ includes octopuses, sculpins, sharks, and skates.
Directed Fishing Closures
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i),
the Regional Administrator may
establish a DFA for a species or species
group if the Regional Administrator
determines that any allocation or
apportionment of a target species has
been or will be reached. If the Regional
Administrator establishes a DFA, and
that allowance is or will be reached
before the end of the fishing year, NMFS
will prohibit directed fishing for that
species or species group in the specified
subarea or district (see
§ 697.20(d)(1)(iii)). Similarly, pursuant
to § 679.21(e), if the Regional
Administrator determines that a fishery
category’s bycatch allowance of halibut,
red king crab, C. bairdi crab, or C. opilio
crab for a specified area has been
reached, the Regional Administrator
will prohibit directed fishing for each
species in that category in the specified
area.
Based upon historic catch patterns
and anticipated fishing activity, the
Regional Administrator has determined
that the groundfish allocation amounts
in Table 10 will be necessary as
incidental catch to support other
anticipated groundfish fisheries for the
2011 and 2012 fishing years.
Consequently, in accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(i), the Regional
Administrator establishes the DFA for
the species and species groups in Table
10 as zero. Therefore, in accordance
with § 679.20(d)(1)(iii), NMFS is
prohibiting directed fishing for these
sectors and species in the specified
areas effective at 1200 hrs, A.l.t., March
1, 2011, through 2400 hrs, A.l.t.,
December 31, 2012. Also, for the BSAI
trawl limited access sector, bycatch
allowances of halibut, red king crab, C.
bairdi crab, and C. opilio crab listed in
Table 10 are insufficient to support
directed fisheries. Therefore, in
accordance with § 679.21(e)(7), NMFS is
prohibiting directed fishing for these
sectors and fishery categories in the
specified areas effective at 1200 hrs,
A.l.t., March 1, 2011, through 2400 hrs,
A.l.t., December 31, 2012.
TABLE 10—2011 AND 2012 DIRECTED FISHING CLOSURES 1
[Groundfish and halibut amounts are in metric tons. Crab amounts are in number of animals]
2011 Incidental
catch allowance
2012 Incidental
catch allowance
Pollock .........................................
ICA pollock ..................................
‘‘Other rockfish’’ ...........................
ICA Atka mackerel ......................
150
1,600
425
75
150
1,600
425
75
Rougheye rockfish ......................
234
240
ICA Pacific ocean perch .............
100
100
ICA Atka mackerel ......................
75
75
ICA Pacific ocean perch .............
ICA Atka mackerel ......................
75
40
75
40
ICA Pacific ocean perch .............
Rougheye rockfish ......................
10
220
10
225
Pacific ocean perch .....................
‘‘Other rockfish’’ ...........................
ICA pollock ..................................
Northern rockfish .........................
Shortraker rockfish ......................
Squids .........................................
Skates .........................................
Sharks .........................................
Octopuses ...................................
4,854
500
45,072
4,000
393
361
14,025
43
128
4,854
500
45,132
4,000
393
361
14,025
43
128
Area
Sector
Species
Bogoslof District ...........................
Aleutian Islands subarea .............
All ................................................
All ................................................
Eastern Aleutian District/Bering
Sea.
Eastern Aleutian District/Bering
Sea.
Eastern Aleutian District ..............
Non-amendment 80 and BSAI
trawl limited access.
All ................................................
Western Aleutian District .............
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Central Aleutian District ...............
Non-amendment 80 and BSAI
trawl limited access.
Non-amendment 80 and BSAI
trawl limited access.
Non-amendment 80 and BSAI
trawl limited access.
Central and Western Aleutian
Districts.
Bering Sea subarea .....................
All ................................................
All ................................................
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
All ................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:17 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11154
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 10—2011 AND 2012 DIRECTED FISHING CLOSURES 1—Continued
[Groundfish and halibut amounts are in metric tons. Crab amounts are in number of animals]
Area
2012 Incidental
catch allowance
Sculpins .......................................
ICA Pacific cod ............................
ICA flathead sole .........................
10,000 .........................................
ICA yellowfin sole ........................
4,420
500
5,000
10,000
2,000
4,420
500
5,000
2,000
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish—halibut mortality, red king
crab zone 1, C. opilio COBLZ,
C. bairdi Zone 1 and 2.
Turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish—halibut mortality, red king crab
zone 1, C. opilio COBLZ, C.
bairdi Zone 1 and 2.
Rockfish—red king crab zone 1 ..
0
0
0
0
0
0
Species
Hook-and-line and pot gear ........
Non-amendment 80 ....................
ICA rock sole ...............................
Non-amendment 80 and BSAI
trawl limited access.
BSAI trawl limited access ...........
1 Maximum
2011 Incidental
catch allowance
Sector
retainable amounts may be found in Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679.
Closures implemented under the 2010
and 2011 BSAI harvest specifications for
groundfish (75 FR 11778, March 12,
2010) remain effective under authority
of these final 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications, and are posted at the
following Web sites: https://alaska
fisheries.noaa.gov/index/infobulletins/
infobulletins.asp?Yr=2011 and https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/2011/
status.htm. While these closures are in
effect, the maximum retainable amounts
at § 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time
during a fishing trip. These closures to
directed fishing are in addition to
closures and prohibitions found in
regulations at 50 CFR part 679.
Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish
Program
On June 6, 2005, the Council adopted
the Rockfish Program to meet the
requirements of Section 802 of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2004 (Pub. L. 108–199). The basis for
the BSAI fishing prohibitions and the
CV BSAI Pacific cod sideboard limits of
the Rockfish Program are discussed in
detail in the final rule for Amendment
68 to the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (71 FR
67210, November 20, 2006). Pursuant to
§ 679.82(d)(6)(i), the CV BSAI Pacific
cod sideboard limit is 0.0 mt. Therefore,
in accordance with § 679.82(d)(7)(ii),
NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for
BSAI Pacific cod in July for CVs under
the Rockfish Program sideboard
limitations.
The Rockfish Program will expire in
December 2011. In June 2010, the
Council proposed a new program to
supersede the existing Rockfish Program
by 2012. NMFS is developing
rulemaking to implement the Council’s
revised program. The revised program,
if approved by the Secretary, may affect
the harvest specifications for 2012.
Listed AFA Catcher/Processor
Sideboard Limits
Pursuant to § 679.64(a), the Regional
Administrator is responsible for
restricting the ability of listed AFA
C/Ps to engage in directed fishing for
groundfish species other than pollock to
protect participants in other groundfish
fisheries from adverse effects resulting
from the AFA and from fishery
cooperatives in the directed pollock
fishery. The basis for these sideboard
limits is described in detail in the final
rules implementing the major
provisions of the AFA (67 FR 79692,
December 30, 2002) and Amendment 80
(72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007).
Table 11 lists the 2011 and 2012 C/P
sideboard limits.
All harvest of groundfish sideboard
species by listed AFA C/Ps, whether as
targeted catch or incidental catch, will
be deducted from the sideboard limits
in Table 11. However, groundfish
sideboard species that are delivered to
listed AFA C/Ps by CVs will not be
deducted from the 2011 and 2012
sideboard limits for the listed AFA C/Ps.
TABLE 11—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 LISTED BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER/PROCESSOR GROUNDFISH
SIDEBOARD LIMITS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
1995–1997
Target species
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Sablefish trawl .......................
Atka mackerel ........................
Rock sole ...............................
Greenland turbot ...................
Arrowtooth flounder ...............
Kamchatka flounder ..............
Flathead sole .........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Area
Retained
catch
BS ..........................................
AI ...........................................
Central AI A season 2 ............
B season 2 ......................
Western AI A season 2 ..........
B season 2 ......................
BSAI ......................................
BS ..........................................
AI ...........................................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
19:17 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Total catch
8
0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
6,317
121
23
76
76
1,925
Frm 00080
Fmt 4700
497
145
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
169,362
17,305
4,987
33,987
33,987
52,755
Sfmt 4700
Ratio of
retained
catch to
total catch
0.016
0
0.115
0.115
0.2
0.2
0.037
0.007
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.036
2011 ITAC
available to
trawl
C/Ps 1
2011 AFA
C/P
side-board
limit
1,211
404
5,037
5,037
670
670
75,905
2,975
1,318
22,015
15,045
37,102
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
19
0
579
579
134
134
2,808
21
7
44
30
1,336
2012 ITAC
available to
trawl C/Ps 1
1,109
370
4,596
4,596
670
670
75,905
2,975
1,233
22,015
15,045
37,102
2012 AFA
C/P
side-board
limit
18
0
529
529
134
134
2,808
21
6
44
30
1,336
11155
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 11—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 LISTED BSAI AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER/PROCESSOR GROUNDFISH
SIDEBOARD LIMITS—Continued
[Amounts are in metric tons]
1995–1997
Target species
Alaska plaice .........................
Other flatfish ..........................
Pacific ocean perch ...............
Northern rockfish ...................
Shortraker rockfish ................
Rougheye rockfish .................
Other rockfish ........................
Squid .....................................
Skates ....................................
Sharks ...................................
Octopuses .............................
Sculpins .................................
Area
Retained
catch
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
BS ..........................................
Eastern AI .............................
Central AI ..............................
Western AI ............................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
EBS/EAI ................................
CAI/WAI .................................
BS ..........................................
AI ...........................................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
BSAI ......................................
Total catch
14
3,058
12
125
3
54
91
50
50
50
18
22
73
553
553
553
553
9,438
52,298
4,879
6,179
5,698
13,598
13,040
2,811
2,811
2,811
621
806
3,328
68,672
68,672
68,672
68,672
Ratio of
retained
catch to
total catch
2011 ITAC
available to
trawl
C/Ps 1
0.001
0.058
0.002
0.02
0.001
0.004
0.007
0.018
0.018
0.018
0.029
0.027
0.022
0.008
0.008
0.008
0.008
2011 AFA
C/P sideboard limit
13,600
2,550
4,854
5,054
4,429
7,474
4,000
393
234
220
500
425
361
14,025
43
128
4,420
14
148
10
101
4
30
28
7
4
4
15
11
8
112
0
1
35
2012 ITAC
available to
trawl C/Ps 1
13,600
2,550
4,854
5,054
4,429
7,474
4,000
393
240
225
500
425
361
14,025
43
128
4,420
2012 AFA
C/P sideboard limit
14
148
10
101
4
30
28
7
4
4
15
11
8
112
0
1
35
1 Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean perch, and BSAI Atka mackerel, flathead sole, rock sole, yellowfin sole are multiplied by the remainder of the TAC after the subtraction of the CDQ reserve under § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C).
2 The seasonal apportionment of Atka mackerel in the open access fishery is 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season. Listed AFA catcher/processors are limited to harvesting no more than zero in the Eastern Aleutian District and Bering Sea subarea, 20 percent of the annual ITAC specified for the Western
Aleutian District, and 11.5 percent of the annual ITAC specified for the Central Aleutian District.
Section 679.64(a)(2) and Tables 40
and 41 of part 679 establish a formula
for calculating PSC sideboard limits for
listed AFA C/Ps. The basis for these
sideboard limits is described in detail in
the final rules implementing the major
provisions of the AFA (67 FR 79692,
December 30, 2002) and Amendment 80
(72 FR 52668, September 14, 2007).
PSC species listed in Table 12 that are
caught by listed AFA C/Ps participating
in any groundfish fishery other than
pollock will accrue against the 2011 and
2012 PSC sideboard limits for the listed
AFA C/Ps. Section 679.21(e)(3)(v)
authorizes NMFS to close directed
fishing for groundfish other than
pollock for listed AFA C/Ps once a 2011
or 2012 PSC sideboard limit listed in
Table 12 is reached.
Crab or halibut PSC caught by listed
AFA C/Ps while fishing for pollock will
accrue against the bycatch allowances
annually specified for either the
midwater pollock or the pollock/Atka
mackerel/‘‘other species’’ fishery
categories under regulations at
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
TABLE 12—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 BSAI AFA LISTED CATCHER/PROCESSOR PROHIBITED SPECIES SIDEBOARD LIMITS
Ratio of PSC
catch to total
PSC
PSC species and area 1
Halibut mortality BSAI ..................................................................................................................
Red king crab zone 1 ..................................................................................................................
C. opilio (COBLZ) ........................................................................................................................
C. bairdi:
Zone 1 ..................................................................................................................................
Zone 2 ..................................................................................................................................
1 Refer
2011 and
2012 PSC
available to
trawl vessels
after subtraction of PSQ 2
2011 and
2012 catcher/
processor
sideboard
limit 2
n/a
0.007
0.153
n/a
175,921
7,421,259
286
1,231
1,135,453
0.14
0.05
741,190
2,250,360
103,767
112,518
to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
amounts are in metric tons of halibut mortality. Crab amounts are in numbers of animals.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
2 Halibut
AFA Catcher Vessel Sideboard Limits
Pursuant to § 679.64(a), the Regional
Administrator is responsible for
restricting the ability of AFA CVs to
engage in directed fishing for groundfish
species other than pollock to protect
participants in other groundfish
fisheries from adverse effects resulting
from the AFA and from fishery
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
cooperatives in the directed pollock
fishery. Section 679.64(b) establishes a
formula for setting AFA CV groundfish
and PSC sideboard limits for the BSAI.
The basis for these sideboard limits is
described in detail in the final rules
implementing the major provisions of
the AFA (67 FR 79692, December 30,
2002) and Amendment 80 (72 FR 52668,
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
September 14, 2007). Tables 13 and 14
list the 2011 and 2012 AFA CV
sideboard limits.
All catch of groundfish sideboard
species made by non-exempt AFA CVs,
whether as targeted catch or incidental
catch, will be deducted from the 2011
and 2012 sideboard limits listed in
Table 13.
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
11156
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 13—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL BSAI GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Ratio of
1995–1997
AFA CV
catch to
1995–1997
TAC
Species
Fishery by area/gear/season
Pacific cod ......................................................
2011 initial
TAC 1
0
n/a
0
n/a
0
0.0006
207
0
208
0
0.0006
0.0006
199
8,685
0
5
200
8,749
0
5
0.0006
0.0006
8,345
4,055
5
2
8,406
4,084
5
2
0.8609
33,290
28,659
33,532
28,868
0.8609
0.8609
0.0906
0.0645
0.0032
4,949
6,748
1,211
404
17,994
4,261
5,809
110
26
58
4,985
6,797
1,109
370
16,431
4,292
5,852
100
24
53
0.0032
0.0001
17,994
5,037
58
1
16,431
4,596
53
0
0.0001
0
5,037
n/a
1
0
4,596
n/a
0
0
0
0.0341
0.0645
0.0205
0.069
0.069
0.0441
0.0441
0.0505
0.1
0.0077
0.0025
0
0.0084
0.0037
0.0037
0.0037
0.0048
0.0095
0.3827
0.0541
0.0541
0.0541
0.0541
n/a
75,905
2,975
1,318
22,015
15,045
13,600
2,550
37,102
4,854
5,054
4,429
n/a
4,000
393
234
220
500
425
361
14,025
43
128
4,420
0
2,588
192
27
1,519
1,038
600
112
1,874
485
39
11
0
34
1
1
1
2
4
138
759
2
7
239
n/a
75,905
2,975
1,233
22,015
15,045
13,600
2,550
37,102
4,854
5,054
4,429
n/a
4,000
393
240
225
500
425
361
14,025
43
128
4,420
0
2,588
192
25
1,519
1,038
600
112
1,874
485
39
11
0
34
1
1
1
2
4
138
759
2
7
239
BSAI .............................................................
Jig gear .................................................
Hook-and-line CV ..................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 .................................
Jun 10–Dec 31 ..............................
Pot gear CV ..........................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 .................................
Sept 1–Dec 31 ...............................
CV < 60 feet LOA using hook-and-line
or pot gear.
Trawl gear CV .......................................
Jan 20–Apr 1 .................................
Apr 1–Jun 10 .................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ................................
BS trawl gear ...............................................
AI trawl gear .................................................
Eastern AI/BS ...............................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ........................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........................................
Central AI .....................................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ........................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........................................
Western AI ...................................................
Jan 1–Jun 10 ........................................
Jun 10–Nov 1 ........................................
BSAI .............................................................
BS .................................................................
AI ..................................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BS trawl gear ...............................................
BS .................................................................
Eastern AI ....................................................
Central AI .....................................................
Western AI ...................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
EBS/EAI .......................................................
CAI/WAI ........................................................
BS .................................................................
AI ..................................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
BSAI .............................................................
Sablefish .........................................................
Atka mackerel ................................................
Rock sole .......................................................
Greenland turbot ............................................
Arrowtooth flounder ........................................
Kamchatka flounder .......................................
Alaska plaice ..................................................
Other flatfish ...................................................
Flathead sole ..................................................
Pacific ocean perch ........................................
Northern rockfish ............................................
Shortraker rockfish .........................................
Rougheye rockfish .........................................
Other rockfish .................................................
Squids ............................................................
Skates ............................................................
Sharks ............................................................
Octopuses ......................................................
Sculpins ..........................................................
2011 AFA
catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
2012 initial
TAC 1
2012 AFA
catcher
vessel
sideboard
limits
1 Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean perch, and BSAI Atka mackerel, flathead sole, and rock sole are multiplied by the remainder of the TAC of that species after the
subtraction of the CDQ reserve under § 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C).
Halibut and crab PSC limits listed in
Table 14 that are caught by AFA CVs
participating in any groundfish fishery
for groundfish other than pollock will
accrue against the 2011 and 2012 PSC
sideboard limits for the AFA CVs.
Sections 679.21(d)(8) and 679.21(e)(3)(v)
authorize NMFS to close directed
fishing for groundfish other than
pollock for AFA CVs once a 2011 or
2012 PSC sideboard limit listed in Table
14 is reached. The PSC that is caught by
AFA CVs while fishing for pollock in
the BSAI will accrue against the bycatch
allowances annually specified for either
the midwater pollock or the pollock/
Atka mackerel/‘‘other species’’ fishery
categories under regulations at
§ 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
TABLE 14—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS FOR THE BSAI 1
PSC species
Target fishery
Halibut .............................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
AFA catcher
vessel PSC
sideboard limit
ratio
category 2
2011 and
2012 PSC limit
after subtraction of PSQ
reserves
2011 and
2012 AFA
catcher vessel
PSC
sideboard limit
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
887
2
Pacific cod trawl .............................................
Pacific cod hook-and-line or pot ....................
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
11157
TABLE 14—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL PROHIBITED SPECIES CATCH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS FOR THE BSAI 1—Continued
PSC species
Target fishery
Red king crab Zone 1 4, 6 ................................
C. opilio COBLZ 4, 6 .........................................
C. bairdi Zone 1 4, 6 .........................................
C. bairdi Zone 2 6 ...........................................
AFA catcher
vessel PSC
sideboard limit
ratio
category 2
2011 and
2012 PSC limit
after subtraction of PSQ
reserves
2011 and
2012 AFA
catcher vessel
PSC
sideboard limit
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.299
0.168
0.33
0.186
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
175,921
7,421,259
741,190
2,250,360
101
228
0
2
5
52,600
1,246,771
244,593
418,567
Yellowfin sole total .........................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/other flatfish 3 ...........
Greenland turbot/arrowtooth/sablefish 4 .........
Rockfish ..........................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/other species 5 ...........
n/a ..................................................................
n/a ..................................................................
n/a ..................................................................
n/a ..................................................................
1 Halibut
amounts are in metric tons of halibut mortality. Crab amounts are in numbers of animals.
fishery categories are defined in regulation at § 679.21(e)(3)(iv).
flatfish’’ for PSC monitoring includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), flathead sole, Greenland turbot, rock
sole, yellowfin sole, Kamchatka flounder, and arrowtooth flounder.
4 Arrowtooth for PSC monitoring includes Kamchatka flounder.
5 ‘‘Other species’’ for PSC monitoring includes octopuses, sculpins, sharks, and skates.
6 Refer to § 679.2 for definitions of areas.
2 Target
3 ‘‘Other
AFA Catcher/Processor and Catcher
Vessel Sideboard Directed Fishing
Closures
Based upon historical catch patterns,
the Regional Administrator has
determined that many of the AFA C/P
and CV sideboard limits listed in Tables
15 and 16 are necessary as incidental
catch to support other anticipated
groundfish fisheries for the 2011 fishing
year. In accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iv), the Regional
Administrator establishes the sideboard
limits listed in Tables 15 and 16 as
DFAs. Because many of these DFAs will
be reached before the end of the year,
the Regional Administrator has
determined, in accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), that NMFS is
prohibiting directed fishing by listed
AFA C/Ps for the species in the
specified areas set out in Table 15 and
directed fishing by non-exempt AFA
CVs for the species in the specified
areas set out in Table 16.
TABLE 15—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT LISTED CATCHER/PROCESSOR SIDEBOARD DIRECTED
FISHING CLOSURES 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
Species
Area
Gear types
Sablefish trawl .....................................................................
BS ........................................
AI ..........................................
BSAI .....................................
BS ........................................
AI ..........................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BS ........................................
Eastern AI ............................
Central AI .............................
Western AI ...........................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
EBS/EAI ...............................
CAI/WAI ...............................
BS ........................................
AI ..........................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
BSAI .....................................
trawl ............................
trawl ............................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
all ................................
Rock sole .............................................................................
Greenland turbot ..................................................................
Arrowtooth flounder .............................................................
Kamchatka flounder .............................................................
Alaska plaice .......................................................................
Other flatfish ........................................................................
Flathead sole .......................................................................
Pacific ocean perch .............................................................
Northern rockfish .................................................................
Shortraker rockfish ..............................................................
Rougheye rockfish ...............................................................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Other rockfish ......................................................................
Squids ..................................................................................
Skates ..................................................................................
Sharks ..................................................................................
Octopuses ............................................................................
Sculpins ...............................................................................
1 Maximum
VerDate Mar<15>2010
retainable amounts may be found in Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679.
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
2011
sideboard
limit
19
0
2,808
21
7
44
30
14
148
1,336
10
101
4
30
28
7
4
4
15
11
8
112
0
1
35
2012
sideboard
limit
18
0
2,808
21
6
44
30
14
148
1,336
10
101
4
30
28
7
4
4
15
11
8
112
0
1
35
11158
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 16—FINAL 2011 AND 2012 AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL SIDEBOARD DIRECTED FISHING
CLOSURES 1
[Amounts are in metric tons]
2011
sideboard
limit
Species
Area
Gear types
Pacific cod ..........................................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BS .............................................
AI ..............................................
Eastern AI/BS ...........................
Central AI .................................
Western AI ...............................
BS .............................................
AI ..............................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BS .............................................
Eastern AI ................................
Central AI .................................
Western AI ...............................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BS/EAI ......................................
CAI/WAI ....................................
BS .............................................
AI ..............................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
BSAI .........................................
hook-and-line ............................
pot ............................................
CV < 60 feet LOA ....................
jig ..............................................
trawl ..........................................
trawl ..........................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
all ..............................................
Sablefish .............................................................
Atka mackerel ....................................................
Greenland turbot ................................................
Arrowtooth flounder ............................................
Kamchatka flounder ...........................................
Alaska plaice ......................................................
Other flatfish .......................................................
Flathead sole ......................................................
Rock sole ...........................................................
Pacific ocean perch ............................................
Northern rockfish ................................................
Shortraker rockfish .............................................
Rougheye rockfish .............................................
Other rockfish .....................................................
Squids ................................................................
Skates ................................................................
Sharks ................................................................
Octopuses ..........................................................
Sculpins ..............................................................
1 Maximum
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
0
10
2
0
100
24
106
0
0
192
25
1,519
1,038
600
112
1,874
2,588
485
39
11
0
34
1
1
1
2
4
138
759
2
7
239
retainable amounts may be found in Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679.
Response to Comments
NMFS received 9 letters of comment,
from 6 CDQ groups and three non-CDQ
industry participants, which included 4
distinct comments, in response to the
proposed 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications. These comments are
summarized and responded to below.
Comment 1: The comment asserts that
the pollock ABCs and TACs are too
high, based on anecdotal observations.
Response: The harvest specifications
process is intended to foster
conservation and management of marine
resources. This process incorporates the
best available scientific information
from the most recent stock assessment
and fisheries evaluation reports
prepared by multi-disciplinary teams of
scientists. Such reports contain the most
recent scientific information on the
condition of various groundfish stocks,
as well as the condition of other
ecosystem components and economic
data about Alaska groundfish fisheries.
This body of information allows the
Council to make scientifically-based
recommendations for annual catch
VerDate Mar<15>2010
0
10
2
0
110
26
116
2
0
192
27
1,519
1,038
600
112
1,874
2,588
485
39
11
0
34
1
1
1
2
4
138
759
2
7
239
2012
sideboard
limit
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
limits that do not exceed, on a species
by species basis, the OFLs and ABCs
established for each BSAI target species
managed under the FMP. NMFS
believes that the 2011 and 2012 are the
correct pollock ABCs and TACs, based
upon this process.
Comment 2: NMFS should account for
the bycatch of groundfish in fisheries
such as the State managed salmon
fisheries.
Response: NMFS is actively engaged
in a process to improve the catch
accounting system to more accurately
account for the bycatch of groundfish in
other fisheries, including State managed
fisheries. NMFS agrees with this
comment. However, this is beyond the
scope of this action.
Comment 3: The 10,000 mt ICA for
rock sole is largely based upon high
levels of yellowfin sole harvest by the
BSAI trawl limited access sector. For
2011 and 2012, the BSAI trawl limited
access harvest is likely to be smaller,
and a 5,000 mt for rock sole is more
appropriate.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response: NMFS agrees with this
comment, and NMFS adjusted the ICA
of rock sole to 5,000 metric tons.
Comment 4: Six CDQ groups
commented that the new Kamchatka
flounder fishery is too small to be a
meaningful CDQ fishery and could
inhibit the prosecution of other CDQ
fisheries. Thus, Kamchatka flounder
should not be a CDQ fishery at this time.
Response: In the proposed 2011 and
2012 harvest specifications NMFS
requested comments about whether
Kamchatka flounder was a directed
fishery of the BSAI under section
305(i)(1)(B)(ii)(II) of the MSA. If it were,
NMFS would allocate 10.7 percent of
the Kamchatka flounder TAC to the
CDQ Program. NMFS specifically
requested comments from the CDQ
groups about the economic value of
Kamchatka flounder and whether the
CDQ groups intend to conduct directed
fishing for Kamchatka flounder in the
future. Based on the comments received,
NMFS has determined that Kamchatka
flounder is not a directed fishery of the
BSAI under section 305(i)(1)(B)(ii)(II).
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Therefore, NMFS will not allocate
Kamchatka flounder to the CDQ
Program in the final 2011 and 2012
harvest specifications. However, NMFS
will consider allocating Kamchatka
flounder to the CDQ Program in the
future if information is presented in
future harvest specifications that the
status of Kamchatka flounder as a
directed fishery of the BSAI has
changed.
Classification
NMFS has determined that these final
harvest specifications are consistent
with the FMP and with the MagnusonStevens Act and other applicable laws.
This action is authorized under 50
CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review
under Executive Orders 12866 and
13563.
NMFS prepared an EIS for this action
(see ADDRESSES) and made it available to
the public on January 12, 2007 (72 FR
1512). On February 13, 2007, NMFS
issued the Record of Decision (ROD) for
the EIS. In January 2011, NMFS
prepared a Supplemental Information
Report (SIR) for this action. Copies of
the EIS, ROD, and SIR for this action are
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The EIS analyzes the environmental
consequences of the groundfish harvest
specifications and alternative harvest
strategies on resources in the action
area. The EIS found no significant
environmental consequences of this
action and its alternatives. The SIR
evaluates the need to prepare a
Supplemental EIS (SEIS) for the 2011
and 2012 groundfish harvest
specifications.
A SEIS should be prepared if (1) the
agency makes substantial changes in the
proposed action that are relevant to
environmental concerns, or (2)
significant new circumstances or
information exist relevant to
environmental concerns and bearing on
the proposed action or its impacts (40
CFR 1502.9(c)(1)). After reviewing the
information contained in the SIR and
SAFE reports, the Regional
Administrator has determined that (1)
approval of the 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications, which were set according
to the preferred harvest strategy in the
EIS, do not constitute a change in the
action; and (2) there are no significant
new circumstances or information
relevant to environmental concerns and
bearing on the action or its impacts.
Additionally, the 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications will result in
environmental impacts within the scope
of those analyzed and disclosed in the
EIS. Therefore, supplemental National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)
documentation is not necessary to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
implement the 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications.
NMFS also prepared an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, analyzing the
methodology for establishing the
relevant TACs. The IRFA evaluated the
impacts on small entities of alternative
harvest strategies for the groundfish
fisheries in the EEZ off Alaska.
Accordingly, NMFS used the IRFA
prepared for the EIS in association with
this action. NMFS published a notice of
the availability of the IRFA and its
summary in the Classification section of
the proposed 2006 and 2007 harvest
specifications for the groundfish
fisheries in the BSAI in the Federal
Register on December 15, 2006 (71 FR
75437). No comments were received
regarding the IRFA or the economic
effects of the TAC-setting methodology.
NMFS also prepared a final regulatory
flexibility analysis (FRFA), as required
by section 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Copies of the FRFA
prepared for this action are available
from NMFS, Alaska Region (see
ADDRESSES). The FRFA analyzed the
methodology for establishing the
relevant TACs. As set forth in the
methodology, TACs are set to a level
that fall within the range of ABCs
recommended by the SSC; the sum of
the TACs must achieve optimum yield
specified in the FMP. While the specific
numbers that the methodology may
produce vary from year to year, the
methodology itself remains constant.
Accordingly, NMFS is using the FRFA
prepared for the EIS in association with
this action. Pursuant to sections 3.2.2
and 3.2.3 of the FMP, the established
methodology produces ABCs and TACs
within specified ranges and the
numbers in this final rule’s preferred
alternatives are within those ranges.
In addition, NMFS considers the
annual rulemakings establishing the
harvest specification numbers to be a
series of closely-related rules stemming
from the harvest strategy and
representing one rule for purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(c)). The need for, and objectives of,
this final rule are described in the
preamble. A summary of the 2007 FRFA
follows. This action is taken in
accordance with the FMP prepared by
the Council pursuant to the MagnusonStevens Act.
There are 244 directly regulated small
entities including approximately 223
small CVs, 15 small C/Ps, and six CDQ
groups. The entities directly regulated
by this action harvest groundfish in the
EEZ of the BSAI, and in parallel
fisheries within State of Alaska waters.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11159
These include entities operating CVs
and C/Ps within the action area, and
entities receiving direct allocations of
groundfish. CVs and C/Ps were
considered to be small entities if their
annual gross receipts of $4 million per
year or less from all economic activities,
including the revenue of their affiliated
operations (see Table 37 to the
Economic Status of the Groundfish
Fisheries off Alaska, 2005, in the 2006
SAFE report, dated February 2007,
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES)).
Estimates of gross product value for
the BSAI non-CDQ and CDQ groundfish
were used as an index of revenue and
potential impacts of the alternative
harvest strategies on small entities.
Revenues were projected to decline
from 2006 levels in 2007 and 2008
under the preferred alternative due to
declines in ABCs for key species, but by
relatively small amounts.
The preferred alternative (Alternative
2) was compared to four other
alternatives. These included Alternative
1, which would have set TACs to
generate fishing rates equal to the
maximum permissible ABC (if the full
TAC were harvested), unless the sum of
TACs exceeded the BSAI OY, in which
case harvests would be limited to the
OY. Alternative 3 would have set TACs
to produce fishing rates equal to the
most recent 5-year average fishing rate.
Alternative 4 would have set TACs to
equal the lower limit of the BSAI OY
range. Alternative 5—the ‘‘no action’’
alternative—would have set TACs equal
to zero.
Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 were all
associated with smaller levels for
important fishery TACs than Alternative
2. Estimated total gross product values
were used as an index of potential
adverse impacts to small entities. As a
consequence of the lower TAC levels,
Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 all had smaller
first wholesale revenue indices than
Alternative 2. Thus, Alternatives 3, 4,
and 5 had greater adverse impacts on
small entities. Alternative 1 appeared to
generate higher values of the gross
revenue index for fishing operations in
the BSAI than Alternative 2. A large part
of the Alternative 1 BSAI revenue
appears to be due to the assumption that
the full Alternative 1 TAC would be
harvested. Much of the larger revenue
was due to increases in flatfish TACs
that were much greater for Alternative 1
than for Alternative 2. In recent years,
halibut bycatch constraints in these
fisheries have kept actual flatfish
catches from reaching Alternative 1
levels. Therefore, a large part of the
revenues associated with Alternative 1
are unlikely to occur. Also, Alternative
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
11160
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
2 TACs are constrained by the ABCs the
Plan Teams and SSC are likely to
recommend to the Council on the basis
of a full consideration of biological
issues. These ABCs are often less than
Alternative 1’s maximum permissible
ABCs; therefore higher TACs under
Alternative 1 may not be consistent with
prudent biological management of the
resource. For these reasons, Alternative
2 is the preferred alternative.
In addition to the IRFA prepared in
association with the groundfish harvest
specifications EIS, NMFS prepared a
supplemental IRFA (SIRFA) in
conjunction with the proposed harvest
specifications (see ADDRESSES). The
SIRFA evaluated the specification of
separate OFLs and TACs for octopuses,
sculpins, sharks, and skates in the BSAI,
consistent with the previously selected
harvest strategy, the tier system used to
set OFL (per the FMP), Amendments 95
and 96 to the FMP, the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable law
(see ADDRESSES). Amendments 95 and
96 to the FMP were published on
October 6, 2010 (75 FR 61639), and split
the ‘‘other species’’ complex into its
component species of octopuses,
sculpins, sharks, and skates.
This supplemental Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (SFRFA)
incorporates the SIRFA, a summary of
the significant issues raised by the
public comments in response to the
IRFA, NMFS’ responses to those
comments, and provides a summary of
the analyses completed to support the
action. The SFRFA augments the FRFA
prepared in connection with the 2007
Alaska Groundfish Harvest
Specification EIS. NMFS published the
proposed harvest specifications on
December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76372) with
comments invited through January 7,
2011. A SIRFA was prepared and
summarized in the ‘‘Classification’’
section of the proposed rule. The
description of this action, its purpose,
and its legal basis are described in the
preamble to the proposed rule and are
not repeated here. No public comments
were specifically received on the SIRFA.
No changes were made from the
proposed rule to the final rule.
The 2010 Economic Status of
Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska report,
prepared in conjunction with the 2010
SAFE report (see ADDRESSES), identifies
209 small groundfish entities operating
in the BSAI, with average revenues from
all sources of about $1.37 million. Most
of these (191) are C/Vs. A majority of the
C/Vs (107) used trawl gear and had
average revenues of about $1.49 million.
There were 38 hook-and-line C/Vs, with
average revenues of about $600,000, and
51 pot C/Vs with average revenues of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
$1.37 million. There were five C/Vs that
used multiple gear types and are
counted in at least two of the preceding
figures. There were 18 C/Ps, mostly
hook-and-line vessels, with average
gross revenues of about $2.53 million.
The 2010 SAFE report may overstate the
number of small entities because it
considers individual vessel gross
revenues, but does not capture
affiliations among vessels. All of these
small entities would be directly
regulated by the proposed action. As
described below, however, certain small
entities may be more likely than others
to be adversely affected by the proposed
action as a result of potential impacts
associated with the incidental catch of
octopuses, sculpins, sharks, and skates
in other target fisheries.
This action does not modify
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements.
NMFS considered several alternatives
to the action to specify separate OFLs
and TACS for BSAI octopuses, sculpins,
sharks, and skates species complexes.
However, each of these alternatives has
been eliminated from further
consideration because it either does not
minimize significant economic impacts
on a substantial number of small entities
or does not accomplish the stated
objectives of, or is in conflict with the
requirements of, applicable statutes.
This action is intended to fulfill the
agency’s mandate to establish catch
limits that are based on the best
available scientific information, and to
achieve optimum yield while
preventing overfishing. This action
adopts the alternative that is both
consistent with the agency’s obligations
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
the FMP and minimizes the likelihood
that the specification of TACs and OFLs
for the octopuses, sculpins, sharks, and
skates species complexes will adversely
affect small entities.
NMFS considered dividing the TACs
for each of the species complexes among
different regulatory areas in the BSAI.
Any such further division of the TACs
would not change the total TACs for
each species complex in the BSAI as a
whole. However, the incidental catch of
fishing vessels that operate within each
of the regulatory areas would be
counted against a reduced TAC and
OFL, which would increase the
likelihood that the TAC or OFL would
be reached and that one or more area
closures may be triggered.
NMFS considered exempting small
entities from compliance with the TACs
for each of the species complexes
evaluated in the SIRFA. However, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NMFS
to implement conservation and
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
management measures that prevent
overfishing. Authorizing unlimited
incidental catch of these species
complexes by small entities would
present an unacceptable risk of
overfishing, and would not be
consistent with the agency’s obligations
under Magnuson-Stevens Act, nor with
the requirements of the Council’s FMP.
In order to minimize the economic
impacts of this action, NMFS
considered allocating relatively large
portions of the TACs for each of the
species complexes to potentially
affected small entities. However, any
such allocation, which would be
motivated solely by economic
considerations under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, would not be consistent
with National Standard 5, which states
that ‘‘no [conservation and management
measure] shall have economic allocation
as its sole purpose.’’ 16 U.S.C.
1851(a)(5).
Finally, NMFS considered
establishing a single group TAC for all
four of the species complexes in the
BSAI, which would substantially reduce
the likelihood that incidental catch
would reach or exceed the TAC or OFL
and result in area closures of target
fisheries. However, the establishment of
a stock complex comprised of species
with such disparate life histories would
not be consistent with the statutory
requirement to establish catch limits
that prevent overfishing for stocks in the
fishery, nor with the Council’s intent in
enacting Amendments 95 and 96.
Adverse impacts on marine mammals
resulting from fishing activities
conducted under this rule are discussed
in the EIS (see ADDRESSES).
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
NOAA, finds good cause to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness for this
rule. Plan Team review occurred in
November 2010, and Council
consideration and recommendations
occurred in December 2010.
Accordingly, NMFS review could not
begin until January 2011. For all
fisheries not currently closed because
the TACs established under the final
2010 and 2011 harvest specifications (75
FR 11778, March 12, 2010) were not
reached, the possibility exists that they
would be closed prior to the expiration
of a 30-day delayed effectiveness period,
if implemented, because their TACs
could be reached. Certain fisheries, such
as those for pollock and Pacific cod are
intensive, fast-paced fisheries. Other
fisheries, such as those for flatfish,
rockfish, octopuses, sculpins, sharks,
skates, and squids, are critical as
directed fisheries and as incidental
catch in other fisheries. U.S. fishing
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
vessels have demonstrated the capacity
to catch the TAC allocations in these
fisheries. Any delay in allocating the
final TACs in these fisheries would
cause confusion to the industry and
potential economic harm through
unnecessary discards. Determining
which fisheries may close is impossible
because these fisheries are affected by
several factors that cannot be predicted
in advance, including fishing effort,
weather, movement of fishery stocks,
and market price. Furthermore, the
closure of one fishery has a cascading
effect on other fisheries by freeing up
fishing vessels, allowing them to move
from closed fisheries to open ones,
increasing the fishing capacity in those
open fisheries and causing them to close
at an accelerated pace.
In fisheries subject to declining
sideboards, a failure to implement the
updated sideboards before initial
season’s end could preclude the
intended economic protection to the
non-sideboarded sectors. Conversely, in
fisheries with increasing sideboards,
economic benefit could be precluded to
the sideboarded sectors.
If the final harvest specifications are
not effective by March 12, 2011, which
is the start of the 2011 Pacific halibut
season as specified by the IPHC, the
hook-and-line sablefish fishery will not
begin concurrently with the Pacific
halibut IFQ season. Delayed
effectiveness of this action would result
in confusion for sablefish harvesters and
economic harm from unnecessary
discard of sablefish that are caught
along with Pacific halibut, as both hookand-line sablefish and Pacific halibut
are managed under the same IFQ
program. Immediate effectiveness of the
final 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications will allow the sablefish
IFQ fishery to begin concurrently with
the Pacific halibut IFQ season. Also, the
immediate effectiveness of this action is
required to provide consistent
management and conservation of fishery
resources based on the best available
scientific information. This is
particularly true of those species which
have lower 2011 ABCs and TACs than
those established in the 2010 and 2011
harvest specifications (75 FR 11778,
March 12, 2010). Immediate
effectiveness also would give the fishing
industry the earliest possible
opportunity to plan and conduct its
fishing operations with respect to new
information about TAC limits.
Therefore, NMFS finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 Feb 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Small Entity Compliance Guide
This final rule is a plain language
guide to assist small entities in
complying with this final rule as
required by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. This final rule’s primary purpose
is to announce the final 2011 and 2012
harvest specifications and prohibited
species bycatch allowances for the
groundfish fisheries of the BSAI. This
action is necessary to establish harvest
limits and associated management
measures for groundfish during the 2011
and 2012 fishing years and to
accomplish the goals and objectives of
the FMP. This action affects all
fishermen who participate in the BSAI
fisheries. The specific amounts of OFL,
ABC, TAC, and PSC are provided in
tables to assist the reader. NMFS will
announce closures of directed fishing in
the Federal Register and information
bulletins released by the Alaska Region.
Affected fishermen should keep
themselves informed of such closures.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1540(f); 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 105–277; Pub. L. 106–
31; Pub. L. 106–554; Pub. L. 108–199; Pub.
L. 108–447; Pub. L. 109–241; Pub. L. 109–
479.
Dated: February 23, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–4538 Filed 2–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket Nos. 0910131362–0087–02 and
0910131363–0087–02]
RIN 0648–XA256
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Sablefish Managed
Under the Individual Fishing Quota
Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; opening.
AGENCY:
NMFS is opening directed
fishing for sablefish with fixed gear
managed under the Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ) Program and the
Community Development Quota (CDQ)
Program. The season will open 1200 hrs,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11161
Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 12,
2011, and will close 1200 hrs, A.l.t.,
November 18, 2011. This period is the
same as the 2011 commercial halibut
fishery opening dates adopted by the
International Pacific Halibut
Commission. The IFQ and CDQ halibut
season is specified by a separate
publication in the Federal Register of
annual management measures.
DATES: Effective March 1, 2011, until
1200 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Obren Davis, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Beginning
in 1995, fishing for Pacific halibut and
sablefish with fixed gear in the IFQ
regulatory areas defined in 50 CFR 679.2
has been managed under the IFQ
Program. The IFQ Program is a
regulatory regime designed to promote
the conservation and management of
these fisheries and to further the
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act and the Northern Pacific Halibut
Act. Persons holding quota share receive
an annual allocation of IFQ. Persons
receiving an annual allocation of IFQ
are authorized to harvest IFQ species
within specified limitations. Further
information on the implementation of
the IFQ Program, and the rationale
supporting it, are contained in the
preamble to the final rule implementing
the IFQ Program published in the
Federal Register, November 9, 1993 (58
FR 59375) and subsequent amendments.
This announcement is consistent with
§ 679.23(g)(1), which requires that the
directed fishing season for sablefish
managed under the IFQ Program be
specified by the Administrator, Alaska
Region, and announced by publication
in the Federal Register. This method of
season announcement was selected to
facilitate coordination between the
sablefish season, chosen by the
Administrator, Alaska Region, and the
halibut season, adopted by the
International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC). The directed
fishing season for sablefish with fixed
gear managed under the IFQ Program
will open 1200 hrs, A.l.t., March 12,
2011, and will close 1200 hrs, A.l.t.,
November 18, 2011. This period runs
concurrently with the IFQ season for
Pacific halibut announced by the IPHC.
The IFQ halibut season will be specified
by a separate publication in the Federal
Register of annual management
measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
E:\FR\FM\01MRR1.SGM
01MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11139-11161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4538]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 101126521-0640-02]
RIN 0648-XZ90
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands; Final 2011 and 2012 Harvest Specifications for
Groundfish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; closures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces final 2011 and 2012 harvest specifications and
prohibited species catch allowances for the groundfish fishery of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI). This action is
necessary to establish harvest limits for groundfish during the 2011
and 2012 fishing years, and to accomplish the goals and objectives of
the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the BSAI (FMP). The
intended effect of this action is to conserve and manage the groundfish
resources in the BSAI in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
DATES: Effective from 1200 hrs, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), March 1,
2011, through 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Final Alaska Groundfish Harvest
Specifications Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Record of Decision
(ROD), Supplementary Information Report (SIR) to the EIS, the Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and Supplemental FRFA prepared
for this action are available from https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. The
final 2010 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for
the groundfish resources of the BSAI, dated November 2010, is available
from the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) at 605 West
4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99510-2252, phone 907-271-2809, or
from the Council's Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Whitney, 907-586-7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal regulations at 50 CFR part 679
implement the FMP and govern the groundfish fisheries in the BSAI. The
[[Page 11140]]
North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared the FMP,
and NMFS approved it under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. General
regulations governing U.S. fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS, after
consultation with the Council, to specify the total allowable catch
(TAC) for each target species; the sum must be within the optimum yield
(OY) range of 1.4 million to 2.0 million metric tons (mt) (see Sec.
679.20(a)(1)(i)). NMFS also must specify apportionments of TACs,
prohibited species catch (PSC) allowances, and prohibited species quota
(PSQ) reserves established by Sec. 679.21; seasonal allowances of
pollock, Pacific cod, and Atka mackerel TAC; Amendment 80 allocations;
and Community Development Quota (CDQ) reserve amounts established by
Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii). The final harvest specifications set forth in
Tables 1 through 16 of this action satisfy these requirements. The sum
of TACs is 2,000,000 mt for 2011 and is 2,000,000 mt for 2012.
Section 679.20(c)(3)(i) further requires NMFS to consider public
comment on the proposed annual TACs (and apportionments thereof) and
PSC allowances, and to publish final harvest specifications in the
Federal Register. The proposed 2011 and 2012 harvest specifications and
PSC allowances for the groundfish fishery of the BSAI were published in
the Federal Register on December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76372). Comments were
invited and accepted through January 7, 2011. NMFS received 9 letters
with 4 comments on the proposed harvest specifications. These comments
are summarized and responded to in the ``Response to Comments'' section
of this rule. NMFS consulted with the Council on the final 2011 and
2012 harvest specifications during the December 2010 Council meeting in
Anchorage, AK. After considering public comments, as well as biological
and economic data that were available at the Council's December
meeting, NMFS is implementing the final 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications as recommended by the Council.
Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) and TAC Harvest Specifications
The final ABC levels are based on the best available biological and
socioeconomic information, including projected biomass trends,
information on assumed distribution of stock biomass, and revised
technical methods used to calculate stock biomass. In general, the
development of ABCs and overfishing levels (OFLs) involves
sophisticated statistical analyses of fish populations. The FMP
specifies a series of six tiers to define OFL and ABC amounts based on
the level of reliable information available to fishery scientists. Tier
one represents the highest level of information quality available while
tier six represents the lowest.
In December 2010, the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC),
Advisory Panel (AP), and Council reviewed current biological
information about the condition of the BSAI groundfish stocks. The
Council's Plan Team compiled and presented this information in the 2010
SAFE report for the BSAI groundfish fisheries, dated November 2010. The
SAFE report contains a review of the latest scientific analyses and
estimates of each species' biomass and other biological parameters, as
well as summaries of the available information on the BSAI ecosystem
and the economic condition of groundfish fisheries off Alaska. The SAFE
report was made available for public review upon notification of the
proposed harvest specifications. The 2010 SAFE report continues to be
available for public review (see ADDRESSES). From these data and
analyses, the Plan Team estimated an OFL and ABC for each species or
species category.
In December 2010, the SSC, AP, and Council reviewed the Plan Team's
recommendations. The SSC concurred with the Plan Team's
recommendations, and the Council adopted the OFL and ABC amounts
recommended by the SSC (Table 1). The final TAC recommendations were
based on the ABCs as adjusted for other biological and socioeconomic
considerations, including maintaining the sum of the TACs within the
required OY range of 1.4 million to 2.0 million mt. The Council adopted
the AP's 2011 and 2012 TAC recommendations. As required by annual catch
limit rules (FR 74 3178, January 16, 2009), none of the Council's
recommended TACs for 2011 or 2012 exceeds the final 2011 or 2012 ABCs
for any species category. The final 2010 and 2011 harvest
specifications approved by the Secretary are unchanged from those
recommended by the Council and are consistent with the preferred
harvest strategy alternative in the EIS (see ADDRESSES). NMFS finds
that the Council's recommended OFLs, ABCs, and TACs are consistent with
the biological condition of groundfish stocks as described in the 2010
SAFE report that was approved by the Council.
Other Actions Potentially Affecting the 2011 and 2012 Harvest
Specifications
NMFS intends to develop a single database that stock assessment
authors can access through a single source such as the Alaska Fisheries
Information Network. The development of this database will require the
cooperation of several agencies, including NMFS, the Alaska Department
of Fish and Game, and the International Pacific Halibut Commission
(IPHC). At its October 2010 meeting, the Council's groundfish Plan
Teams recommended the formation of a total catch accounting working
group to assist NMFS in developing a methodology to estimate total
catch of groundfish. While much of the information is currently
available and will be incorporated into the final 2010 SAFE reports,
the development of an adequate methodology is ongoing and not fully
ready for use in the final SAFE reports. NMFS intends to have the
information available for the assessment cycle in the fall of 2011.
The Council is currently considering an action to modify the non-
Chinook salmon management measures to minimize non-Chinook salmon
bycatch. This potential action could impose cap threshold limits,
sector specific allocations, and area specific closures for BSAI
groundfish closures. This action is not expected to be in place by the
2012 fishing year.
The Council has approved a new program to replace the Gulf of
Alaska Rockfish Pilot Program (Rockfish Program), which is scheduled to
expire on December 31, 2011. NMFS is currently developing regulations
to implement this program. The new rockfish program could alter BSAI
groundfish sideboards for vessels participating in the Rockfish
Program. This new program is expected to be in place for the 2012
fishing year.
In 2010, NMFS Alaska Region completed a Section 7 formal
consultation on the effects of the authorization of the Alaska
groundfish fisheries on Endangered Species Act listed species under
NMFS jurisdiction. The consultation resulted in a biological opinion
that determined that the effects of the Alaska groundfish fisheries
were likely to jeopardize the continued existence of, and adversely
modify designated critical habitat for, the western distinct population
segment of Steller sea lions. The biological opinion included a
reasonable and prudent alternative (RPA) that requires changes to the
BSAI Atka mackerel and Aleutian Islands subarea Pacific cod fisheries
to prevent the likelihood of jeopardy of extinction or adverse
modification of
[[Page 11141]]
critical habitat for Steller sea lions. Separate rulemaking for
implementation of the RPA became effective January 1, 2011 (FR 75
77535, December 13, 2010; and 75 FR 81921, December 29, 2010). Changes
to the Atka mackerel and Pacific cod harvest specifications that are
required by the rule implementing the RPA are described in the section
for each of these target species. The proposed harvest specifications
notified the public of possible changes to the harvest specification
limits.
At the October 2010 meeting, the Council and the Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) recommended separating Kamchatka flounder
from the arrowtooth flounder complex starting in the year 2011. As a
result, arrowtooth flounder and Kamchatka flounder have separate OFLs,
ABCs, and TACs for 2011 and 2012. In the proposed 2011 and 2012 harvest
specifications NMFS requested public comment on the proposal to
allocate 10.7 percent of the Kamchatka flounder TAC to the CDQ Program.
Six comments were received, and NMFS has determined to not allocate
Kamchatka flounder to the six CDQ groups in 2011. See the Response to
Comments section below.
Changes From the Proposed 2010 and 2011 Harvest Specifications in the
BSAI
In October 2010, the Council made its recommendations for the
proposed 2011 and 2012 harvest specifications (75 FR 76372, December 8,
2010), based largely on information contained in the 2009 SAFE report
for the BSAI groundfish fisheries. Through the proposed harvest
specifications, NMFS notified the public that these harvest
specifications were subject to change and that the Council would
consider information contained in the 2010 SAFE report, recommendations
from the SSC, Plan Team, and AP committees, and public testimony when
making its recommendations for final harvest specification levels at
the December Council meeting. NMFS further notified the public that, as
required by the BSAI Groundfish FMP and its implementing regulations,
the sum of the TACs must be within the optimum yield range of 1.4 and
2.0 million metric tons.
Information contained in the 2010 SAFE reports indicates an
increase in biomass for several groundfish species. At the December
Council meeting, the SSC recommended increasing the ABCs for many
species in 2011 and 2012 based on the best and most recent information
contained in the 2010 SAFE reports. This increase resulted in an ABC
sum total that exceeds 2 million metric tons for both 2011 and 2012.
Based on the SSC ABC recommendations and the 2010 SAFE reports, the AP
recommended raising the TACs for more economically valuable species
that have increasing biomasses such as pollock, Pacific cod, Pacific
ocean perch, and Atka mackerel in the Eastern Aleutian Islands and
Bering Sea subarea. Because these increases caused the sum of the TACs
to exceed the 2 million metric ton limit, section 3.2.3.4 of the BSAI
FMP required that the TACs be adjusted. The AP recommended a downward
adjustment of TACs for several species that are not part of the
directed fishery and that are easily avoided, such as octopuses,
sculpins, sharks, skates, squid, and Alaska plaice. After receiving
testimony from the Amendment 80 cooperatives, the AP recommended a
reduction in Amendment 80 flatfish species TACs and arrowtooth flounder
TAC to levels that the Amendment 80 fleet believed they could harvest
given their PSC constraints. The Council accepted the SSC and AP
recommendations.
The changes to TAC between the proposed and final harvest
specifications are based on the most recent scientific and economic
information and are consistent with the FMP and regulatory obligations
and harvest strategy as described in the proposed harvest
specifications. These changes are compared in the following table.
Table 1 lists the Council's recommended final 2011 and 2012 OFL,
ABC, TAC, initial TAC (ITAC) and CDQ reserve amounts of the BSAI
groundfish. NMFS concurs with these recommendations. The final 2011 and
2012 TAC recommendations for the BSAI are within the OY range
established for the BSAI and do not exceed the ABC for any single
species or complex. The apportionment of TAC amounts among fisheries
and seasons is discussed below.
Comparison of Final 2011 and 2012 With Proposed 2011 and 2012 Total Allowable Catch in the BSAI
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 2012
2011 final 2011 difference 2012 final 2012 difference
Species Area \1\ TAC proposed TAC from TAC proposed TAC from
proposed proposed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock................................. BS........................ 1,252,000 1,107,000 145,000 1,253,658 1,105,000 148,658
AI........................ 19,000 19,000 0 19,000 19,000 0
Bogoslof.................. 150 75 75 150 75 75
Pacific cod............................. BSAI...................... 227,950 207,580 20,370 229,608 207,580 22,028
Sablefish............................... BS........................ 2,850 2,500 350 2,610 2,500 110
AI........................ 1,900 1,860 40 1,740 1,860 -120
Atka mackerel........................... EAI/BS.................... 40,300 20,900 19,400 36,800 20,900 15,900
CAI....................... 11,280 26,000 -14,720 10,293 26,000 -15,707
WAI....................... 1,500 18,100 -16,600 1,500 18,100 -16,600
Yellowfin sole.......................... BSAI...................... 196,000 213,000 -17,000 197,660 213,000 -15,340
Rock sole............................... BSAI...................... 85,000 90,000 -5,000 85,000 90,000 -5,000
Greenland turbot........................ BS........................ 3,500 3,700 -200 3,500 3,700 -200
AI........................ 1,550 1,670 -120 1,450 1,670 -220
Arrowtooth flounder..................... BSAI...................... 25,900 60,000 -34,100 25,900 60,000 -34,100
Kamchatka flounder...................... BSAI...................... 17,700 17,700 0 17,700 17,700 0
Flathead sole........................... BSAI...................... 41,548 60,000 -18,452 41,548 60,000 -18,452
Other flatfish.......................... BSAI...................... 3,000 17,300 -14,300 3,000 17,300 -14,300
Alaska plaice........................... BSAI...................... 16,000 40,000 -24,000 16,000 40,000 -24,000
Pacific ocean perch..................... BS........................ 5,710 3,790 1,920 5,710 3,790 1,920
EAI....................... 5,660 4,180 1,480 5,660 4,180 1,480
CAI....................... 4,960 4,230 730 4,960 4,230 730
WAI....................... 8,370 6,480 1,890 8,370 6,480 1,890
[[Page 11142]]
Northern rockfish....................... BSAI...................... 4,000 7,290 -3,290 4,000 7,290 -3,290
Shortraker rockfish..................... BSAI...................... 393 387 6 393 387 6
Rougheye rockfish \2\................... BS/EAI.................... 234 42 192 240 42 198
CAI/WAI................... 220 489 -269 225 489 -264
Other rockfish.......................... BS........................ 500 485 15 500 485 15
AI........................ 500 555 -55 500 555 -55
Squid................................... BSAI...................... 425 1,970 -1,545 425 1,970 -1,545
Skates.................................. BSAI...................... 16,500 30,000 -13,500 16,500 30,000 -13,500
Sharks.................................. BSAI...................... 50 449 -399 50 449 -399
Octopuses............................... BSAI...................... 150 233 -83 150 233 -83
Sculpins................................ BSAI...................... 5,200 30,035 -24,835 5,200 30,035 -24,835
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... BSAI...................... 2,000,000 1,997,000 3,000 2,000,000 1,995,000 5,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Bering Sea subarea (BS), Aleutian Islands subarea (AI), Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI), Eastern Aleutian District (EAI),
Central Aleutian District (CAI), and Western Aleutian District (WAI).
\2\ The proposed rule split rougheye rockfish TACs by the Aleutian Islands, and the Bering Sea. The final rule splits rougheye rockfish by the Bering
Sea and Eastern Aleutians District, and the Central Aleutian District and Western Aleutian District.
[[Page 11143]]
Table 1--Final 2011 and 2012 Overfishing Level (Ofl), Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC), Total Allowable Catch (TAC), Initial TAC (ITAC), and CDQ Reserve Allocation of Groundfish in the BSAI
\1\
[Amounts are in metric tons]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 2012
Species Area -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFL ABC TAC ITAC \2\ CDQ \3\ OFL ABC TAC ITAC \2\ CDQ \3\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock \3\..................... BS \2\............ 2,450,000 1,270,000 1,252,000 1,126,800 125,200 3,170,000 1,600,000 1,253,658 1,128,292 125,366
AI \2\............ 44,500 36,700 19,000 17,100 1,900 50,400 41,600 19,000 17,100 1,900
Bogoslof.......... 22,000 156 150 150 0 22,000 156 150 150 0
Pacific cod 4, 5................ BSAI.............. 272,000 235,000 227,950 203,559 24,391 329,000 281,000 229,608 205,040 24,568
Sablefish \5\................... BS................ 3,360 2,850 2,850 2,351 392 3,080 2,610 2,610 1,109 98
AI................ 2,250 1,900 1,900 1,544 321 2,060 1,740 1,740 370 33
Atka mackerel \5\............... BSAI.............. 101,000 85,300 53,080 47,400 5,680 92,200 77,900 48,593 43,394 5,199
EAI/BS............ n/a 40,300 40,300 35,988 4,312 n/a 36,800 36,800 32,862 3,938
CAI............... n/a 24,000 11,280 10,073 1,207 n/a 21,900 10,293 9,192 1,101
WAI............... n/a 21,000 1,500 1,340 161 n/a 19,200 1,500 1,340 161
Yellowfin sole \5\.............. BSAI.............. 262,000 239,000 196,000 175,028 20,972 266,000 242,000 197,660 176,510 21,150
Rock sole 5, 6.................. BSAI.............. 248,000 224,000 85,000 75,905 9,095 243,000 219,000 85,000 75,905 9,095
Greenland turbot \5\............ BSAI.............. 7,220 6,140 5,050 4,293 n/a 6,760 5,750 4,950 4,208 n/a
BS................ n/a 4,590 3,500 2,975 375 n/a 4,300 3,500 2,975 375
AI................ n/a 1,550 1,550 1,318 0 n/a 1,450 1,450 1,233 0
Arrowtooth flounder \5\......... BSAI.............. 186,000 153,000 25,900 22,015 2,771 191,000 157,000 25,900 22,015 2,771
Kamchatka flounder.............. BSAI.............. 23,600 17,700 17,700 15,045 0 23,600 17,700 17,700 15,045 0
Flathead sole 5, 7.............. BSAI.............. 83,300 69,300 41,548 37,102 4,446 82,100 68,300 41,548 37,102 4,446
Other flatfish \8\.............. BSAI.............. 19,500 14,500 3,000 2,550 0 19,500 14,500 3,000 2,550 0
Alaska plaice................... BSAI.............. 79,100 65,100 16,000 13,600 0 83,800 69,100 16,000 13,600 0
Pacific ocean perch \5\......... BSAI.............. 36,300 24,700 24,700 21,812 n/a 34,300 24,700 24,700 21,812 n/a
BS................ n/a 5,710 5,710 4,854 0 n/a 5,710 5,710 4,854 0
EAI............... n/a 5,660 5,660 5,054 606 n/a 5,660 5,660 5,054 606
CAI............... n/a 4,960 4,960 4,429 531 n/a 4,960 4,960 4,429 531
WAI............... n/a 8,370 8,370 7,474 896 n/a 8,370 8,370 7,474 896
Northern rockfish............... BSAI.............. 10,600 8,670 4,000 3,400 0 10,400 8,330 4,000 3,400 0
Shortraker rockfish............. BSAI.............. 524 393 393 334 0 524 393 393 334 0
Rougheye rockfish \9\........... BSAI.............. 549 454 454 386 0 563 465 465 395 0
EBS/EAI........... n/a 234 234 199 0 n/a 240 240 204 0
CAI/WAI........... n/a 220 220 187 0 n/a 225 225 191 0
Other rockfish \10\............. BSAI.............. 1,700 1,280 1,000 850 0 1,700 1,280 1,000 850 0
BS................ n/a 710 500 425 0 n/a 710 500 425 0
AI................ n/a 570 500 425 0 n/a 570 500 425 0
Squids.......................... BSAI.............. 2,620 1,970 425 361 0 2,620 1,970 425 361 0
Skates.......................... BSAI.............. 37,800 31,500 16,500 14,025 0 37,200 31,000 16,500 14,025 0
Sharks.......................... BSAI.............. 1,360 1,020 50 43 0 1,360 1,020 50 43 0
Octopuses....................... BSAI.............. 528 396 150 128 0 528 396 150 128 0
Sculpins........................ BSAI.............. 58,300 43,700 5,200 4,420 0 58,300 43,700 5,200 4,420 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .................. 3,954,111 2,534,729 2,000,000 1,790,200 199,467 4,731,995 2,911,610 2,000,000 1,788,157 198,926
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These amounts apply to the entire BSAI management area unless otherwise specified. With the exception of pollock, and for the purpose of these harvest specifications, the Bering Sea (BS)
subarea includes the Bogoslof District.
\2\ Except for pollock, the portion of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line and pot gear, and Amendment 80 species, 15 percent of each TAC is put into a reserve. The ITAC for these
species is the remainder of the TAC after the subtraction of these reserves.
\3\ Under Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), the annual Bering Sea subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for the incidental
catch allowance (3.0 percent), is further allocated by sector for a directed pollock fishery as follows: Inshore--50 percent; catcher/processor--40 percent; and motherships--10 percent.
Under Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual Aleutian Islands subarea pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10 percent) and second for
the incidental catch allowance (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery.
\4\ The Pacific cod TAC is reduced by three percent from the ABC to account for the State guideline harvest level in State waters of the Aleutian Islands subarea.
\5\ For the Amendment 80 species (Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean perch, yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole, and Pacific cod), 10.7 percent of the TAC is reserved for use
by CDQ participants (see Sec. Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31). Twenty percent of the sablefish TAC allocated to hook-and-line gear or pot gear, 7.5 percent of the sablefish TAC
allocated to trawl gear, and 10.7 percent of the TACs for Bering Sea Greenland turbot and arrowtooth flounder are reserved for use by CDQ participants (see Sec. 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) and
(D)). Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot, ``other flatfish'', Alaska plaice, Bering Sea Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, shortraker rockfish, rougheye rockfish, ``other rockfish'',
octopuses, sculpins, sharks, skates, and squid are not allocated to the CDQ program.
\6\ ``Rock sole'' includes Lepidopsetta polyxystra (Northern rock sole) and Lepidopsetta bilineata (Southern rock sole).
\7\ ``Flathead sole'' includes Hippoglossoides elassodon (flathead sole) and Hippoglossoides robustus (Bering flounder).
\8\ ``Other flatfish'' includes all flatfish species, except for halibut (a prohibited species), arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole, Greenland turbot, Kamchatka flounder, rock sole, and
yellowfin sole.
\9\ ``Rougheye rockfish'' includes Sebastes aleutianus (rougheye) and Sebastes melanostictus (blackspotted).
\10\ ``Other rockfish'' includes all Sebastes and Sebastolobus species except for Pacific ocean perch, northern, shortraker, and rougheye rockfish.
[[Page 11144]]
Groundfish Reserves and the Incidental Catch Allowance (ICA) for
Pollock, Atka Mackerel, Flathead Sole, Rock Sole, Yellowfin Sole, and
Aleutian Islands Pacific Ocean Perch
Section 679.20(b)(1)(i) requires the placement of 15 percent of the
TAC for each target species, except for pollock, the hook-and-line and
pot gear allocation of sablefish, and the Amendment 80 species, in a
non-specified reserve. Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(B) requires that 20
percent of the hook-and-line and pot gear allocation of sablefish be
allocated to the fixed gear sablefish CDQ reserve. Section
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(D) requires allocation of 7.5 percent of the trawl
gear allocations of sablefish and 10.7 percent of the Bering Sea
Greenland turbot and arrowtooth flounder TACs to the respective CDQ
reserves. Section 679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) requires allocation of 10.7
percent of the TACs for Atka mackerel, Aleutian Islands Pacific ocean
perch, yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead sole, and Pacific cod to the
CDQ reserves. Sections 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) and 679.31(a) also require
the allocation of 10 percent of the BSAI pollock TACs to the pollock
CDQ directed fishing allowance (DFA). The entire Bogoslof District
pollock TAC is allocated as an ICA (see Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(ii)). With
the exception of the hook-and-line and pot gear sablefish CDQ reserve,
the regulations do not further apportion the CDQ allocations by gear.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(1), NMFS allocates a pollock
ICA of 3 percent of the BS subarea pollock TAC after subtraction of the
10 percent CDQ reserve. This allowance is based on NMFS' examination of
the pollock incidental catch, including the incidental catch by CDQ
vessels, in target fisheries other than pollock from 1999 through 2010.
During this 12-year period, the pollock incidental catch ranged from a
low of 2.4 percent in 2006 to a high of 5 percent in 1999, with a 12-
year average of 3 percent. Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i)
and (ii), NMFS establishes a pollock ICA of 1,600 mt of the AI subarea
TAC after subtraction of the 10 percent CDQ DFA. This allowance is
based on NMFS' examination of the pollock incidental catch, including
the incidental catch by CDQ vessels, in target fisheries other than
pollock from 2003 through 2010. During this 8-year period, the
incidental catch of pollock ranged from a low of 5 percent in 2006 to a
high of 10 percent in 2003, with an 8-year average of 7 percent.
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8) and (10), NMFS allocates ICAs of
5,000 mt of flathead sole, 5,000 mt of rock sole, 2,000 mt of yellowfin
sole, 10 mt of Western Aleutian District Pacific (WAI) ocean perch, 75
mt of Central Aleutian District (CAI) Pacific ocean perch, 100 mt of
Eastern Aleutian District (EAI) Pacific ocean perch, 40 mt of WAI Atka
mackerel, 75 mt of CAI Atka mackerel, and 75 mt of EAI and BS subarea
Atka mackerel TAC after subtraction of the 10.7 percent CDQ reserve.
These allowances are based on NMFS' examination of the incidental catch
in other target fisheries from 2003 through 2010.
The regulations do not designate the remainder of the non-specified
reserve by species or species group. Any amount of the reserve may be
apportioned to a target species category during the year, providing
that such apportionments do not result in overfishing (see Sec.
679.20(b)(1)(i)). The Regional Administrator has determined that the
ITACs specified for the species listed in Table 2 need to be
supplemented from the non-specified reserve because U.S. fishing
vessels have demonstrated the capacity to catch the full TAC
allocations. Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 679.20(b)(3), NMFS is
apportioning the amounts shown in Table 2 from the non-specified
reserve to increase the ITAC for northern rockfish, shortraker
rockfish, rougheye rockfish, and Bering Sea ``other rockfish'' by 15
percent of the TAC in 2011 and 2012.
Table 2--Final 2011 and 2012 Apportionment of Reserves to ITAC Categories
[Amounts are in metric tons]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 2012
Species-area or subarea 2011 ITAC reserve 2011 final 2012 ITAC reserve 2012 final
amount ITAC amount ITAC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shortraker rockfish-BSAI.......... 334 59 393 334 59 393
Rougheye rockfish-EBS/EAI......... 199 35 234 204 36 240
Rougheye rockfish-CAI/WAI......... 187 33 220 191 34 225
Northern rockfish-BSAI............ 3,400 600 4,000 3,400 600 4,000
Other rockfish--Bering Sea subarea 425 75 500 425 75 500
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 4,545 802 5,347 4,554 804 5,358
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocation of Pollock TAC Under the American Fisheries Act (AFA)
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A) requires that the pollock TAC
apportioned to the BS subarea, after subtraction of the 10 percent for
the CDQ program and the 3 percent for the ICA, be allocated as a DFA as
follows: 50 percent to the inshore sector, 40 percent to the catcher/
processor (C/P) sector, and 10 percent to the mothership sector. In the
BS subarea, 40 percent of the DFA is allocated to the A season (January
20-June 10), and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the B season
(June 10-November 1) (Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)). The AI directed
pollock fishery allocation to the Aleut Corporation is the amount of
pollock remaining in the AI subarea after subtracting 1,900 mt for the
CDQ DFA (10 percent) and 1,600 mt for the ICA (Sec.
679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(ii)). In the AI subarea, 40 percent of the DFA
is allocated to the A season and the remainder of the directed pollock
fishery is allocated to the B season. Table 3 lists these 2011 and 2012
amounts.
Section 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4) also includes several specific
requirements regarding BS subarea pollock allocations. First, 8.5
percent of the pollock allocated to the C/P sector will be available
for harvest by AFA catcher vessels (CVs) with C/P sector endorsements,
unless the Regional Administrator receives a cooperative contract that
provides for the distribution of harvest among AFA C/Ps and AFA CVs in
a manner agreed to by all members. Second, AFA C/Ps not listed in the
AFA are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of the pollock
allocated to the C/P sector. Table 3 lists the 2011 and 2012
allocations of pollock TAC. Tables 11 through 16 list the AFA C/P and
CV harvesting sideboard limits. The tables
[[Page 11145]]
for the pollock allocations to the BS subarea inshore pollock
cooperatives and open access sector will be posted on the Alaska Region
Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Table 3 also lists seasonal apportionments of pollock and harvest
limits within the Steller Sea Lion Conservation Area (SCA). The harvest
within the SCA, as defined at Sec. 679.22(a)(7)(vii), is limited to 28
percent of the annual DFA until 12 noon, April 1 as provided in Sec.
679.22(a)(5)(i)(C). The remaining 12 percent of the 40 percent annual
DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside the SCA before 12
noon, April 1 or inside the SCA after 12 noon, April 1. If less than 28
percent of the annual DFA is taken inside the SCA before 12 noon, April
1, the remainder will be available to be taken inside the SCA after 12
noon, April 1. The A season pollock SCA harvest limit will be
apportioned to each sector in proportion to each sector's allocated
percentage of the DFA. Table 3 lists these 2011 and 2012 amounts by
sector.
Table 3--Final 2011 and 2012 Allocations of Pollock TACs to the Directed Pollock Fisheries and to the CDQ Directed Fishing Allowances (DFA)\1\
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 A season \1\ 2011 B 2012 A season \1\ 2012 B
2011 ---------------------------- season \1\ 2012 ---------------------------- season \1\
Area and sector Allocations SCA harvest -------------- Allocations SCA harvest -------------
A season DFA limit \2\ B season DFA A season DFA limit \2\ B season DFA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bering Sea subarea...................... 1,252,000 n/a n/a n/a 1,253,658 n/a n/a n/a
CDQ DFA............................. 125,200 50,080 35,056 75,120 125,366 50,146 35,102 75,219
ICA \1\............................. 33,804 n/a n/a n/a 33,849 n/a n/a n/a
AFA Inshore......................... 546,498 218,599 153,019 327,899 547,222 218,889 153,222 328,333
AFA Catcher/Processors \3\.......... 437,198 174,879 122,416 262,319 437,777 175,111 122,578 262,666
Catch by C/Ps................... 400,037 160,015 n/a 240,022 400,566 160,227 n/a 240,340
Catch by CVs \3\................ 37,162 14,865 n/a 22,297 37,211 14,884 n/a 22,327
Unlisted C/P Limit \4\...... 2,186 874 n/a 1,312 2,189 876 n/a 1,313
AFA Motherships..................... 109,300 43,720 30,604 65,580 109,444 43,778 30,644 65,667
Excessive Harvesting Limit \5\...... 191,274 n/a n/a n/a 191,528 n/a n/a n/a
Excessive Processing Limit \6\...... 327,899 n/a n/a n/a 328,333 n/a n/a n/a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Bering Sea DFA.................... 1,092,996 437,198 306,039 655,798 1,094,443 437,777 306,444 656,666
Aleutian Islands subarea \1\............ 19,000 n/a n/a n/a 19,000 n/a n/a n/a
CDQ DFA............................. 1,900 760 n/a 1,140 1,900 760 n/a 1,140
ICA................................. 1,600 800 n/a 800 1,600 800 n/a 800
Aleut Corporation................... 15,500 15,500 n/a 0 15,500 15,500 n/a 0
Bogoslof District ICA \7\............... 150 n/a n/a n/a 150 n/a n/a n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A), the BS subarea pollock, after subtraction for the CDQ DFA (10 percent) and the ICA (3 percent), is allocated
as a DFA as follows: inshore sector--50 percent, catcher/processor sector (C/P)--40 percent, and mothership sector--10 percent. In the BS subarea, 40
percent of the DFA is allocated to the A season (January 20-June 10) and 60 percent of the DFA is allocated to the B season (June 10-November 1).
Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iii)(B)(2)(i) and (ii), the annual AI pollock TAC, after subtracting first for the CDQ directed fishing allowance (10
percent) and second the ICA (1,600 mt), is allocated to the Aleut Corporation for a directed pollock fishery. In the AI subarea, the A season is
allocated 40 percent of the ABC and the B season is allocated the remainder of the directed pollock fishery.
\2\ In the BS subarea, no more than 28 percent of each sector's annual DFA may be taken from the SCA before April 1. The remaining 12 percent of the
annual DFA allocated to the A season may be taken outside of SCA before April 1 or inside the SCA after April 1. If less than 28 percent of the annual
DFA is taken inside the SCA before April 1, the remainder will be available to be taken inside the SCA after April 1.
\3\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4), not less than 8.5 percent of the DFA allocated to listed C/Ps shall be available for harvest only by
eligible catcher vessels delivering to listed C/Ps.
\4\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(4)(iii), the AFA unlisted C/Ps are limited to harvesting not more than 0.5 percent of the C/Ps sector's
allocation of pollock.
\5\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(6), NMFS establishes an excessive harvesting share limit equal to 17.5 percent of the sum of the non-CDQ
pollock DFAs.
\6\ Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(7), NMFS establishes an excessive processing share limit equal to 30.0 percent of the sum of the non-CDQ
pollock DFAs.
\7\ The Bogoslof District is closed by the final harvest specifications to directed fishing for pollock. The amounts specified are for ICA only and are
not apportioned by season or sector.
Note: Seasonal or sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
Allocation of the Atka Mackerel TACs
Section 679.20(a)(8) allocates the Atka mackerel TACs to the
Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors, after subtraction
of the CDQ reserves, jig gear allocation, and ICAs for the BSAI trawl
limited access sector and non-trawl gear (Table 4). The process for
allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel to the Amendment 80 and BSAI
trawl limited access sectors is listed in Table 33 to part 679 and
Sec. 679.91. Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(i), up to 2 percent of the
EAI and the BS subarea Atka mackerel ITAC may be allocated to jig gear.
The amount of this allocation is determined annually by the Council
based on several criteria, including the anticipated harvest capacity
of the jig gear fleet. The Council recommended, and NMFS approves, a
0.5 percent allocation of the Atka mackerel ITAC in the EAI and BS
subarea to the jig gear in 2011 and 2012. This percentage is applied
after subtraction of the CDQ reserve and the ICA.
The RPA implemented on January 1, 2011, (FR 75 77535, December 13,
2010, and 75 FR 81921, December 29, 2010), requires that NMFS make
several changes from the proposed to the final harvest specifications
for BSAI Atka mackerel. The platoon management of Atka mackerel harvest
inside the harvest limit area is no longer needed because the RPA
prohibits all retention of Atka mackerel in Area 543 and requires that
nearly all directed fishing for Atka mackerel in waters 0 nm to 20 nm
around Steller sea lion sites in Area 542. The harvest limit area
limits that were in the proposed harvest specification therefore have
been removed from the final harvest specifications in Areas 542 and
543. The TACs in these two areas, which were set to ABC, decreased from
the proposed amounts. In area 543, the final amount is set to account
for discards in other fisheries since the RPA at Sec. 679.7(a)(19)
prohibits retention in Area 543. Also the final Area 542 TAC decreased
from the proposed TAC since the RPA at Sec. 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C)(3)
limits the annual TAC for this area to no more than 47 percent of the
Area 542 ABC.
Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) apportions the Atka mackerel ITAC into
two equal seasonal allowances. The RPA changed the end of the A season
and start of the B season dates at Sec. 679.23(e)(3). The first
[[Page 11146]]
seasonal allowance is made available for directed fishing with trawl
gear from January 20 to June 10 (A season), and the second seasonal
allowance is made available from June to November 1 (B season). Also,
Sec. 679.23(e)(4)(iii) the RPA applies Atka mackerel seasons to CDQ
Atka mackerel fishing. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by
season.
Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C)(ii)(2) requires the Amendment 80
cooperatives and CDQ groups to limit harvest to 10 percent of their
Central Aleutian District Atka mackerel allocation equally divided
between the A and B seasons within waters 10 nm to 20 nm of Gramp Rock
and Tag Island, as described on Table 12 to part 679. Vessels not
fishing under the authority of an Amendment 80 cooperative quota or CDQ
allocation are prohibited from conducting directed fishing for Atka
mackerel inside Steller sea lion critical habitat in the Central
Aleutian District.
Table 4 lists these 2011 and 2012 Atka mackerel season and area
allowances, as well as the sector allocations. The 2012 allocations for
Atka mackerel between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the Amendment 80
limited access sector will not be known until eligible participants
apply for participation in the program by November 1, 2011.
Table 4--Final 2011 and 2012 Seasonal and Spatial Allowances, Gear Shares, CDQ Reserve, Incidental Catch Allowance, and Amendment 80 Allocations of the
BSAI Atka Mackerel TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2011 allocation by area 2012 allocation by area
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Central Eastern Central
Sector \1\ Season 2, 3, 4 Aleutian Aleutian Western Aleutian Aleutian Western
District/ District Aleutian District/ District Aleutian
Bering Sea \5\ District Bering Sea \5\ District
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAC........................................ n/a.......................... 40,300 11,280 1,500 36,800 10,293 1,500
CDQ reserve................................ Total........................ 4,312 1,207 161 3,938 1,101 161
A............................ 2,156 603 80 1,969 551 80
Critical habitat \5\......... n/a 60 n/a n/a 55 n/a
B............................ 2,156 603 80 1,969 551 80
Critical habitat \5\......... n/a 60 n/a n/a 55 n/a
ICA........................................ Total........................ 75 75 40 75 75 40
Jig \6\.................................... Total........................ 180 0 0 164 0 0
BSAI trawl limited access.................. Total........................ 2,859 800 0 3,262 912 0
A............................ 1,429 400 0 1,631 456 0
B............................ 1,429 400 0 1,631 456 0
Amendment 80 sectors....................... Total........................ 32,875 9,198 1,300 29,361 8,205 1,300
A............................ 16,437 4,599 650 14,681 4,102 650
B............................ 16,437 4,599 650 14,681 4,102 650
Alaska Groundfish Cooperative.............. Total........................ 19,181 5,389 755 n/a n/a n/a
A............................ 9,591 2,695 377 n/a n/a n/a
Critical habitat \5\......... n/a 269 n/a n/a n/a n/a
B............................ 9,591 2,695 377 n/a n/a n/a
Critical habitat \5\......... n/a 269 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Alaska Seafood Cooperative................. Total........................ 13,694 3,809 545 n/a n/a n/a
A............................ 6,847 1,904 272 n/a n/a n/a
Critical habitat \5\......... n/a 190 n/a n/a n/a n/a
B............................ 6,847 1,904 272 n/a n/a n/a
Critical habitat \5\......... n/a 190 n/a n/a n/a n/a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii) allocates the Atka mackerel TACs, after subtraction of the CDQ reserves, jig gear allocation, and ICAs to the Amendment 80
and BSAI trawl limited access sectors. The allocation of the ITAC for Atka mackerel to the Amendment 80 and BSAI trawl limited access sectors is
established in Table 33 to part 679 and Sec. 679.91. The CDQ reserve is 10.7 percent of the TAC for use by CDQ participants (see Sec. Sec.
679.20(b)(1)(ii)(C) and 679.31).
\2\ Sections 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(A) and 679.22(a) establish temporal and spatial limitations for the Atka mackerel fishery.
\3\ The seasonal allowances of Atka mackerel are 50 percent in the A season and 50 percent in the B season.
\4\ Section 679.23(e)(3) authorizes directed fishing for Atka mackerel with trawl gear during the A season from January 20 to June 10 and the B season
from June 10 to November 1.
\5\ Section 679.20(a)(8)(ii)(C) requires the TAC in area 542 shall be no more than 47% of ABC, and Atka mackerel harvests for Amendment 80 cooperatives
and CDQ groups within waters 10 nm to 20 nm of Gramp Rock and Tag Island, as described Table 12 to part 679, in Area 542 are limited to no more than
10 percent of the Amendment 80 cooperative Atka mackerel allocation or 10 percent of the CDQ Atka mackerel allocation.
\6\ Section 679.20(a)(8)(i) requires that up to 2 percent of the Eastern Aleutian District and the Bering Sea subarea TAC be allocated to jig gear after
subtraction of the CDQ reserve and ICA. The amount of this allocation is 0.5 percent. The jig gear allocation is not apportioned by season.
Note: Seasonal or sector apportionments may not total precisely due to rounding.
Allocation of the Pacific Cod ITAC
Section 679.20(a)(7)(i) and (ii) allocates the Pacific cod TAC in
the BSAI, after subtraction of 10.7 percent for the CDQ reserve, as
follows: 1.4 percent to vessels using jig gear; 2.0 percent to hook-
and-line and pot CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) length overall (LOA); 0.2
percent to hook-and-line CVs greater than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m)
LOA; 48.7 percent to hook-and-line C/P; 8.4 percent to pot CVs greater
than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA; 1.5 percent to pot C/Ps; 2.3
percent to AFA trawl C/Ps; 13.4 percent to non-AFA trawl C/Ps; and 22.1
percent to trawl CVs. The ICA for the hook-and-line and pot sectors
will be deducted from the aggregate portion of Pacific cod TAC
allocated to the hook-and-line and pot sectors. For 2011 and 2012, the
Regional Administrator establishes an ICA of 500 mt based on
anticipated incidental catch by these sectors in other fisheries. The
allocation of the ITAC for Pacific cod to the Amendment 80 sector is
established in Table 33 to part 679 and Sec. 679.91. The 2012
allocations for Pacific cod between Amendment 80 cooperatives and the
Amendment 80 limited access
[[Page 11147]]
sector will not be known until November 1, 2011, the date by which the
applicants eligible to apply for participation in the Amendment 80
program must file their application. Amendment 80 applications for 2012
have not yet been submitted to NMFS, thereby preventing NMFS from
calculating 2012 allocations. NMFS will post 2012 Amendment 80
allocations when they become available in December 2011.
The Pacific cod ITAC is apportioned into seasonal allowances to
disperse the Pacific cod fisheries over the fishing year (see
Sec. Sec. 679.20(a)(7) and 679.23(e)(5)). In accordance with Sec.
679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B) and (C), any unused portion of a seasonal Pacific
cod allowance will become available at the beginning of the next
seasonal allowance.
The CDQ and non-CDQ season allowances by gear based on the 2011 and
2012 Pacific cod TACs are listed in Tables 5a and 5b based on the
sector allocation percentages of Pacific cod set forth at Sec. Sec.
679.20(a)(7)(i)(B) and 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(A); and the seasonal allowances
of Pacific cod set forth at Sec. 679.23(e)(5).
The RPA implemented on January 1, 2011 (75 FR 77535, December 13,
2010), includes two prohibitions for Pacific cod. Section 679.7(a)(19)
prohibits retention of Pacific cod in Area 543 and Sec. 679.7(a)(23)
prohibits directed fishing for Pacific cod with hook-and-line, pot, or
jig gear in the Aleutian Islands subarea November 1 through December
31.
Table 5a--Final 2011 Gear Shares and Seasonal Allowances of the BSAI Pacific Cod TAC
[Amounts are in metric tons]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seasonal apportionment
Gear sector Percent Share of gear Share of ---------------------------------
sector total sector total Dates Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total TAC..................... 100 227,950 n/a n/a............. n/a
CDQ........................... 10.7 24,391 n/a see Sec. n/a
679.20(a)(7)(i)
(B).
Total hook-and-line/pot gear.. 60.8 123,764 n/a n/a............. n/a
Hook-and-line/pot ICA \1\..... n/a 500 n/a see Sec. n/a
679.20(a)(7)(ii
)(B).
Hook-and-line/pot sub-total... n/a 123,264 n/a n/a............. n/a
Hook-and-line catcher/ 48.7 n/a 98,733 Jan 1-Jun 10.... 50,354
processor.
.............. .............. .............. Jun 10-Dec 31... 48,379
Hook-and-line catcher vessel 0.2 n/a 405 Jan 1-Jun 10.... 207
>= 60 ft LOA.
.............. .............. .............. Jun 10-Dec 31... 199
Pot catcher/processor......... 1.5 n/a 3,041 Jan 1-Jun 10.... 1,551
.............. .............. .............. Sept 1-Dec 31... 1,490
Pot catcher vessel >= 60 ft 8.4 n/a 17,030 Jan 1-Jun 10.... 8,685
LOA.
.............. .............. .............. Sept 1-Dec 31... 8,345
Catcher vessel < 60 ft LOA 2 n/a 4,055 n/a............. n/a
using hook-and-line or pot
gear.
Trawl catcher vessel.......... 22.1 44,987 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.... 33,290
Apr 1-Jun 10.... 4,949
Jun 10-Nov 1.... 6,748
AFA trawl catcher/processor... 2.3 4,682 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.... 3,511
.............. .............. .............. Apr 1-Jun 10.... 1,170
.............. .............. .............. Jun 10-Nov 1.... 0
Amendment 80.................. 13.4 27,277 n/a Jan 20-Apr 1.... 20,458
.............. .............. .............. Apr 1-Jun 10.... 6,819
.............. .............. .............. Jun 10-Nov 1.... 0
Alaska Groundfish Co