License No. NPF-3; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision, 10409-10410 [2011-4147]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices
31. Department of State, Bureau of
Diplomatic Security (N1–59–10–25, 2
items, 2 temporary items). Records of
the Diplomatic Security Command
Center’s initial reporting on domestic
and overseas security incidents,
including brief summaries of possible
security incidents and daily multiplesource synopses of events and concerns
in countries around the world.
Permanent, substantive reports on
security concerns and incidents are
captured elsewhere in the bureau’s
records.
32. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration (N1–
406–09–26, 22 items, 20 temporary
items). Planning and program
development records of the Federal Aid
program, including airport access files,
annual statistical data, Appalachian
development highway system program
records, certification of public mileage,
coastal zone management files, coal
haul road study files, smart growth files,
economic studies and surveys, Statewide transportation improvement
program and transportation
improvement plans files, Federal Aid
system files, map files, metropolitan
planning organizations files, State-wide
planning and research status reports,
public transportation files, nonmotorized needs files, State obligations,
highway systems correspondence, State
traffic count data and size and weight
program files. Proposed for permanent
retention are planning and research
subject files and National Scenic
Byways studies.
33. Environmental Protection Agency,
Agency-wide (N1–412–10–2, 2 items, 2
temporary items). Case files of the
Environmental Alternative Dispute
Resolution Program.
34. Export-Import Bank of the United
States, Agency-wide (N1–275–10–7, 1
item, 1 temporary item). Copies of
Department of State cables used by the
agency for informational purposes.
35. National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Agency-wide (N1–255–
09–2, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Records
relating to general employee suggestions
including background papers,
suggestions, approvals, disapprovals,
and review processes.
36. National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Agency-wide (N1–255–
10–3, 6 items, 5 temporary items).
Records relating to the agency’s
education programs including education
packages, project descriptions, funding
sources, participant records, and survey
responses. Proposed for permanent
retention are curriculum materials.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: February 17, 2011.
Michael J. Kurtz,
Assistant Archivist for Records Services—
Washington, DC.
[FR Doc. 2011–4264 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–346; NRC–2010–0253]
License No. NPF–3; FirstEnergy
Nuclear Operating Company Notice of
Issuance of Director’s Decision
Notice is hereby given that the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC), has
issued a Director’s Decision with regard
to a petition dated April 5, 2010, filed
by David Lochbaum, hereafter referred
to as the ‘‘Petitioner.’’ The petition
concerns the operation of the DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1
(DBNPS).
The petition requested that the NRC
issue a Show Cause Order, or
comparable enforcement action,
preventing the DBNPS from restarting
following the shutdown in February
2010, until adequate protection
standards were met.
As the basis for the April 5, 2010,
request, the Petitioner states that
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
(the licensee for DBNPS) has violated
Federal regulations and the explicit
conditions of its operating license by
operating for longer than 6 hours with
pressure boundary leakage. The
Petitioner considers such operation to
be potentially unsafe and to be in
violation of Federal regulations. To
support the Petitioner’s belief that the
facility is prohibited from operating
longer than 6 hours with pressure
boundary leakage, the petition
references the facility operating license;
the technical specifications for DBNPS;
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 50, ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Production and Utilization
Facilities,’’ Appendix A, ‘‘General
Design Criteria for Nuclear Power
Plants’’; and the Standard Technical
Specifications.
The petition of April 5, 2010, states
that the licensee for DBNPS has
repeatedly violated Federal regulations
and the explicit conditions of its
operating license by operating the
reactor longer than 6 hours with
pressure boundary leakage. In doing so,
the Petitioner states that the public was
exposed to elevated and undue risk. The
NRC’s regulations and the operating
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10409
license the NRC issued for DBNPS
define adequate protection standards,
which include zero reactor coolant
pressure boundary leakage during
operation, with the requirement to shut
down the reactor within 6 hours if such
leakage exists. The Petitioner states that
with regard to the DBNPS, evidence
demonstrates that the adequate
protection standard was not met on
multiple occasions and that it is
imperative for the NRC to act now to
protect the public.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed
Director’s Decision to the Petitioner and
to the licensee on November 10, 2010.
The Petitioner responded with
comments on November 23, 2010, and
the licensee did not provide comments.
The final Director’s Decision includes a
summary of the comments and the NRC
staff’s response to them.
The Director of the Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation has determined that
the request to issue a Show Cause Order
or comparable enforcement-related
action to the licensee for DBNPS is
denied. The Director’s Decision [DD–
11–02] pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206,
‘‘Requests for Action under This
Subpart,’’ explains the reasons for this
decision. The complete text of the
Director’s Decision is available for
inspection in the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System at the Commission’s Public
Document Room, located at One White
Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and from the
ADAMS Public Library component on
the NRC’s Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html (the Public
Electronic Reading Room), ADAMS
Accession No. ML110250189).
In summary, the NRC has completed
a rigorous Special Inspection and
determined that enforcement is not
required for this matter and that the
NRC has reasonable assurance that
adequate protection standards have
been met and will continue to be met at
DBNPS. NRC Region III Inspection
Report 05000346/2010–008, dated
October 22, 2010, focused on these
concerns. The NRC Special Inspection
Team was chartered to assess the
circumstances surrounding the
identification of the flaws in the reactor
pressure vessel head control rod drive
mechanism (CRDM) nozzle penetrations
at DBNPS. The NRC has reviewed in
detail the CDRM nozzle cracking, as
well as the circumstances surrounding
the causes of this cracking and previous
opportunities for identification and
intervention. The NRC’s inspection
determined that the public health and
safety have not been, nor are likely to
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
10410
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices
be, adversely affected. The inspection
determined that the licensee conformed
to the subject NRC regulatory
requirements pertinent in this
circumstance and applicable to
assessing the cause and effect of the
CRDM nozzle cracking conditions.
A copy of the Director’s Decision will
be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission’s
review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206
of the Commission’s regulations. As
provided for by this regulation, the
Director’s Decision will constitute the
final action of the Commission 25 days
after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion,
institutes a review of the Director’s
Decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of February 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–4147 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2011–0006]
Sunshine Federal Register Notice
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
Weeks of February 21, 28, March
7, 14, 21, 28, 2011.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
DATES:
Week of February 21, 2011
Thursday, February 24, 2011
9 a.m. Briefing on Groundwater Task
Force (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Margie Kotzalas, 301–415–1727)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov,
Week of February 28, 2011—Tentative
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
9 a.m. Briefing on Reactor Materials
Aging Management Issues (Public
Meeting) (Contact: Allen Hiser,
301–415–5650)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov,
Week of March 7, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 7, 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Week of March 14, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 14, 2011.
Week of March 21, 2011—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of March 21, 2011.
Week of March 28, 2011—Tentative
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
9 a.m. Briefing on Small Modular
Reactors (Public Meeting) (Contact:
Stephanie Coffin, 301–415–6877)
This meeting will be webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov,
*
*
*
*
*
*The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html,
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify Bill
Dosch, Chief, Work Life and Benefits
Branch, at 301–415–6200, TDD: 301–
415–2100, or by e-mail at
william.dosch@nrc.gov. Determinations
on requests for reasonable
accommodation will be made on a caseby-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an e-mail to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: February 17, 2011.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–4150 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MC2011–21 and CP2011–59;
Order No. 674]
New Postal Product
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
add International Business Reply
Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to
the competitive product list. The Postal
Service also states that it has entered
into an additional IBRS contract, which
is the successor to an IBRS 2 contract.
DATES: Comments are Due: February 22,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing
Online’’ link in the banner at the top of
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing
the Commission’s Filing Online system
at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as the source for case-related
information for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820 (case-related
information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On February 11, 2011, the Postal
Service filed a request pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq.
to add International Business Reply
Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to
the competitive product list and
announcing that it has entered into an
additional IBRS contract, which is the
successor to an IBRS 2 contract.1 The
Postal Service asserts that the new IBRS
Competitive Contract 3 product is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The
Request has been assigned Docket No.
MC2011–21.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a redacted
contract related to the proposed new
product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3)
and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment 2.
The contract is assigned Docket No.
CP2011–59.
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add International Business Reply Service
Competitive Contract 3 to the Competitive Products
List and Notice of Filing of Contract (Under Seal),
February 11, 2011 (Request).
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10409-10410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4147]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-346; NRC-2010-0253]
License No. NPF-3; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Notice
of Issuance of Director's Decision
Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), has issued
a Director's Decision with regard to a petition dated April 5, 2010,
filed by David Lochbaum, hereafter referred to as the ``Petitioner.''
The petition concerns the operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS).
The petition requested that the NRC issue a Show Cause Order, or
comparable enforcement action, preventing the DBNPS from restarting
following the shutdown in February 2010, until adequate protection
standards were met.
As the basis for the April 5, 2010, request, the Petitioner states
that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee for DBNPS) has
violated Federal regulations and the explicit conditions of its
operating license by operating for longer than 6 hours with pressure
boundary leakage. The Petitioner considers such operation to be
potentially unsafe and to be in violation of Federal regulations. To
support the Petitioner's belief that the facility is prohibited from
operating longer than 6 hours with pressure boundary leakage, the
petition references the facility operating license; the technical
specifications for DBNPS; Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) part 50, ``Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization
Facilities,'' Appendix A, ``General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power
Plants''; and the Standard Technical Specifications.
The petition of April 5, 2010, states that the licensee for DBNPS
has repeatedly violated Federal regulations and the explicit conditions
of its operating license by operating the reactor longer than 6 hours
with pressure boundary leakage. In doing so, the Petitioner states that
the public was exposed to elevated and undue risk. The NRC's
regulations and the operating license the NRC issued for DBNPS define
adequate protection standards, which include zero reactor coolant
pressure boundary leakage during operation, with the requirement to
shut down the reactor within 6 hours if such leakage exists. The
Petitioner states that with regard to the DBNPS, evidence demonstrates
that the adequate protection standard was not met on multiple occasions
and that it is imperative for the NRC to act now to protect the public.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed Director's Decision to the
Petitioner and to the licensee on November 10, 2010. The Petitioner
responded with comments on November 23, 2010, and the licensee did not
provide comments. The final Director's Decision includes a summary of
the comments and the NRC staff's response to them.
The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has
determined that the request to issue a Show Cause Order or comparable
enforcement-related action to the licensee for DBNPS is denied. The
Director's Decision [DD-11-02] pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, ``Requests for
Action under This Subpart,'' explains the reasons for this decision.
The complete text of the Director's Decision is available for
inspection in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System at
the Commission's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint
North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and from the ADAMS Public Library component on the
NRC's Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public
Electronic Reading Room), ADAMS Accession No. ML110250189).
In summary, the NRC has completed a rigorous Special Inspection and
determined that enforcement is not required for this matter and that
the NRC has reasonable assurance that adequate protection standards
have been met and will continue to be met at DBNPS. NRC Region III
Inspection Report 05000346/2010-008, dated October 22, 2010, focused on
these concerns. The NRC Special Inspection Team was chartered to assess
the circumstances surrounding the identification of the flaws in the
reactor pressure vessel head control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzle
penetrations at DBNPS. The NRC has reviewed in detail the CDRM nozzle
cracking, as well as the circumstances surrounding the causes of this
cracking and previous opportunities for identification and
intervention. The NRC's inspection determined that the public health
and safety have not been, nor are likely to
[[Page 10410]]
be, adversely affected. The inspection determined that the licensee
conformed to the subject NRC regulatory requirements pertinent in this
circumstance and applicable to assessing the cause and effect of the
CRDM nozzle cracking conditions.
A copy of the Director's Decision will be filed with the Secretary
of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR
2.206 of the Commission's regulations. As provided for by this
regulation, the Director's Decision will constitute the final action of
the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Director's
Decision within that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of February 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-4147 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P