License No. NPF-3; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision, 10409-10410 [2011-4147]

Download as PDF emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices 31. Department of State, Bureau of Diplomatic Security (N1–59–10–25, 2 items, 2 temporary items). Records of the Diplomatic Security Command Center’s initial reporting on domestic and overseas security incidents, including brief summaries of possible security incidents and daily multiplesource synopses of events and concerns in countries around the world. Permanent, substantive reports on security concerns and incidents are captured elsewhere in the bureau’s records. 32. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (N1– 406–09–26, 22 items, 20 temporary items). Planning and program development records of the Federal Aid program, including airport access files, annual statistical data, Appalachian development highway system program records, certification of public mileage, coastal zone management files, coal haul road study files, smart growth files, economic studies and surveys, Statewide transportation improvement program and transportation improvement plans files, Federal Aid system files, map files, metropolitan planning organizations files, State-wide planning and research status reports, public transportation files, nonmotorized needs files, State obligations, highway systems correspondence, State traffic count data and size and weight program files. Proposed for permanent retention are planning and research subject files and National Scenic Byways studies. 33. Environmental Protection Agency, Agency-wide (N1–412–10–2, 2 items, 2 temporary items). Case files of the Environmental Alternative Dispute Resolution Program. 34. Export-Import Bank of the United States, Agency-wide (N1–275–10–7, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Copies of Department of State cables used by the agency for informational purposes. 35. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Agency-wide (N1–255– 09–2, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Records relating to general employee suggestions including background papers, suggestions, approvals, disapprovals, and review processes. 36. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Agency-wide (N1–255– 10–3, 6 items, 5 temporary items). Records relating to the agency’s education programs including education packages, project descriptions, funding sources, participant records, and survey responses. Proposed for permanent retention are curriculum materials. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Feb 23, 2011 Jkt 223001 Dated: February 17, 2011. Michael J. Kurtz, Assistant Archivist for Records Services— Washington, DC. [FR Doc. 2011–4264 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50–346; NRC–2010–0253] License No. NPF–3; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Notice of Issuance of Director’s Decision Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), has issued a Director’s Decision with regard to a petition dated April 5, 2010, filed by David Lochbaum, hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Petitioner.’’ The petition concerns the operation of the DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS). The petition requested that the NRC issue a Show Cause Order, or comparable enforcement action, preventing the DBNPS from restarting following the shutdown in February 2010, until adequate protection standards were met. As the basis for the April 5, 2010, request, the Petitioner states that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee for DBNPS) has violated Federal regulations and the explicit conditions of its operating license by operating for longer than 6 hours with pressure boundary leakage. The Petitioner considers such operation to be potentially unsafe and to be in violation of Federal regulations. To support the Petitioner’s belief that the facility is prohibited from operating longer than 6 hours with pressure boundary leakage, the petition references the facility operating license; the technical specifications for DBNPS; Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 50, ‘‘Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,’’ Appendix A, ‘‘General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants’’; and the Standard Technical Specifications. The petition of April 5, 2010, states that the licensee for DBNPS has repeatedly violated Federal regulations and the explicit conditions of its operating license by operating the reactor longer than 6 hours with pressure boundary leakage. In doing so, the Petitioner states that the public was exposed to elevated and undue risk. The NRC’s regulations and the operating PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10409 license the NRC issued for DBNPS define adequate protection standards, which include zero reactor coolant pressure boundary leakage during operation, with the requirement to shut down the reactor within 6 hours if such leakage exists. The Petitioner states that with regard to the DBNPS, evidence demonstrates that the adequate protection standard was not met on multiple occasions and that it is imperative for the NRC to act now to protect the public. The NRC sent a copy of the proposed Director’s Decision to the Petitioner and to the licensee on November 10, 2010. The Petitioner responded with comments on November 23, 2010, and the licensee did not provide comments. The final Director’s Decision includes a summary of the comments and the NRC staff’s response to them. The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has determined that the request to issue a Show Cause Order or comparable enforcement-related action to the licensee for DBNPS is denied. The Director’s Decision [DD– 11–02] pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, ‘‘Requests for Action under This Subpart,’’ explains the reasons for this decision. The complete text of the Director’s Decision is available for inspection in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System at the Commission’s Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and from the ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC’s Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room), ADAMS Accession No. ML110250189). In summary, the NRC has completed a rigorous Special Inspection and determined that enforcement is not required for this matter and that the NRC has reasonable assurance that adequate protection standards have been met and will continue to be met at DBNPS. NRC Region III Inspection Report 05000346/2010–008, dated October 22, 2010, focused on these concerns. The NRC Special Inspection Team was chartered to assess the circumstances surrounding the identification of the flaws in the reactor pressure vessel head control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzle penetrations at DBNPS. The NRC has reviewed in detail the CDRM nozzle cracking, as well as the circumstances surrounding the causes of this cracking and previous opportunities for identification and intervention. The NRC’s inspection determined that the public health and safety have not been, nor are likely to E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1 10410 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices be, adversely affected. The inspection determined that the licensee conformed to the subject NRC regulatory requirements pertinent in this circumstance and applicable to assessing the cause and effect of the CRDM nozzle cracking conditions. A copy of the Director’s Decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for the Commission’s review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission’s regulations. As provided for by this regulation, the Director’s Decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Director’s Decision within that time. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of February 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Eric J. Leeds, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011–4147 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2011–0006] Sunshine Federal Register Notice Nuclear Regulatory Commission. AGENCY: Weeks of February 21, 28, March 7, 14, 21, 28, 2011. PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. STATUS: Public and Closed. DATES: Week of February 21, 2011 Thursday, February 24, 2011 9 a.m. Briefing on Groundwater Task Force (Public Meeting) (Contact: Margie Kotzalas, 301–415–1727) This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov, Week of February 28, 2011—Tentative emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Tuesday, March 1, 2011 9 a.m. Briefing on Reactor Materials Aging Management Issues (Public Meeting) (Contact: Allen Hiser, 301–415–5650) This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov, Week of March 7, 2011—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 7, 2011. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Feb 23, 2011 Jkt 223001 Week of March 14, 2011—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 14, 2011. Week of March 21, 2011—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of March 21, 2011. Week of March 28, 2011—Tentative Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9 a.m. Briefing on Small Modular Reactors (Public Meeting) (Contact: Stephanie Coffin, 301–415–6877) This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov, * * * * * *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651. * * * * * The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html, * * * * * The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Bill Dosch, Chief, Work Life and Benefits Branch, at 301–415–6200, TDD: 301– 415–2100, or by e-mail at william.dosch@nrc.gov. Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a caseby-case basis. * * * * * This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969), or send an e-mail to darlene.wright@nrc.gov. Dated: February 17, 2011. Rochelle C. Bavol, Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–4150 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. MC2011–21 and CP2011–59; Order No. 674] New Postal Product AGENCY: PO 00000 Postal Regulatory Commission. Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ACTION: Notice. The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service request to add International Business Reply Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to the competitive product list. The Postal Service also states that it has entered into an additional IBRS contract, which is the successor to an IBRS 2 contract. DATES: Comments are Due: February 22, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically by accessing the ‘‘Filing Online’’ link in the banner at the top of the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing the Commission’s Filing Online system at https://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filingonline/login.aspx. Commenters who cannot submit their views electronically should contact the person identified in SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section as the source for case-related information for advice on alternatives to electronic filing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820 (case-related information) or DocketAdmins@prc.gov (electronic filing assistance). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Notice of Filing III. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction On February 11, 2011, the Postal Service filed a request pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. to add International Business Reply Service (IBRS) Competitive Contract 3 to the competitive product list and announcing that it has entered into an additional IBRS contract, which is the successor to an IBRS 2 contract.1 The Postal Service asserts that the new IBRS Competitive Contract 3 product is a competitive product ‘‘not of general applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2011–21. The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract related to the proposed new product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id. Attachment 2. The contract is assigned Docket No. CP2011–59. 1 Request of the United States Postal Service to Add International Business Reply Service Competitive Contract 3 to the Competitive Products List and Notice of Filing of Contract (Under Seal), February 11, 2011 (Request). E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10409-10410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4147]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-346; NRC-2010-0253]


License No. NPF-3; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Notice 
of Issuance of Director's Decision

    Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), has issued 
a Director's Decision with regard to a petition dated April 5, 2010, 
filed by David Lochbaum, hereafter referred to as the ``Petitioner.'' 
The petition concerns the operation of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power 
Station, Unit 1 (DBNPS).
    The petition requested that the NRC issue a Show Cause Order, or 
comparable enforcement action, preventing the DBNPS from restarting 
following the shutdown in February 2010, until adequate protection 
standards were met.
    As the basis for the April 5, 2010, request, the Petitioner states 
that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (the licensee for DBNPS) has 
violated Federal regulations and the explicit conditions of its 
operating license by operating for longer than 6 hours with pressure 
boundary leakage. The Petitioner considers such operation to be 
potentially unsafe and to be in violation of Federal regulations. To 
support the Petitioner's belief that the facility is prohibited from 
operating longer than 6 hours with pressure boundary leakage, the 
petition references the facility operating license; the technical 
specifications for DBNPS; Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(10 CFR) part 50, ``Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization 
Facilities,'' Appendix A, ``General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power 
Plants''; and the Standard Technical Specifications.
    The petition of April 5, 2010, states that the licensee for DBNPS 
has repeatedly violated Federal regulations and the explicit conditions 
of its operating license by operating the reactor longer than 6 hours 
with pressure boundary leakage. In doing so, the Petitioner states that 
the public was exposed to elevated and undue risk. The NRC's 
regulations and the operating license the NRC issued for DBNPS define 
adequate protection standards, which include zero reactor coolant 
pressure boundary leakage during operation, with the requirement to 
shut down the reactor within 6 hours if such leakage exists. The 
Petitioner states that with regard to the DBNPS, evidence demonstrates 
that the adequate protection standard was not met on multiple occasions 
and that it is imperative for the NRC to act now to protect the public.
    The NRC sent a copy of the proposed Director's Decision to the 
Petitioner and to the licensee on November 10, 2010. The Petitioner 
responded with comments on November 23, 2010, and the licensee did not 
provide comments. The final Director's Decision includes a summary of 
the comments and the NRC staff's response to them.
    The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has 
determined that the request to issue a Show Cause Order or comparable 
enforcement-related action to the licensee for DBNPS is denied. The 
Director's Decision [DD-11-02] pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, ``Requests for 
Action under This Subpart,'' explains the reasons for this decision. 
The complete text of the Director's Decision is available for 
inspection in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint 
North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 
Rockville, Maryland, and from the ADAMS Public Library component on the 
NRC's Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public 
Electronic Reading Room), ADAMS Accession No. ML110250189).
    In summary, the NRC has completed a rigorous Special Inspection and 
determined that enforcement is not required for this matter and that 
the NRC has reasonable assurance that adequate protection standards 
have been met and will continue to be met at DBNPS. NRC Region III 
Inspection Report 05000346/2010-008, dated October 22, 2010, focused on 
these concerns. The NRC Special Inspection Team was chartered to assess 
the circumstances surrounding the identification of the flaws in the 
reactor pressure vessel head control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzle 
penetrations at DBNPS. The NRC has reviewed in detail the CDRM nozzle 
cracking, as well as the circumstances surrounding the causes of this 
cracking and previous opportunities for identification and 
intervention. The NRC's inspection determined that the public health 
and safety have not been, nor are likely to

[[Page 10410]]

be, adversely affected. The inspection determined that the licensee 
conformed to the subject NRC regulatory requirements pertinent in this 
circumstance and applicable to assessing the cause and effect of the 
CRDM nozzle cracking conditions.
    A copy of the Director's Decision will be filed with the Secretary 
of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR 
2.206 of the Commission's regulations. As provided for by this 
regulation, the Director's Decision will constitute the final action of 
the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the 
Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Director's 
Decision within that time.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of February 2011.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-4147 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.