Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment Request, 10365-10366 [2011-4114]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices
10365
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE—Continued
SF–
424D number of
annual respondents
Agency
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average burden
on respondent
per response in
hours
Total burden
hours
NEH ..................................................................
NIST .................................................................
NRC .................................................................
NSF ..................................................................
SBA ..................................................................
SSA ..................................................................
STATE ..............................................................
TREASURY ......................................................
USAID ..............................................................
USDA ...............................................................
USDOJ .............................................................
VA ....................................................................
0
193
0
0
26
0
0
0
289
727
0
391
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
193
0
0
26
0
0
0
289
727
0
391
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
0
97
0
0
13
0
0
0
145
364
0
196
Total ..........................................................
............................
............................
............................
............................
2,574
Seleda Perryman,
Office of the Secretary, HHS PRA Reports
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–4112 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151–AE–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New; 60-day
Notice]
Agency Information Collection
Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed information collection request
for public comment. Interested persons
are invited to send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects:
(1) The necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, e-mail your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and OS document
identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be directed
to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer
at the above email address within 60days.
Proposed Project: Evaluation of the
Effectiveness of an Educational
Interactive Video on Research
Integrity—OMB No. 0990–New–Office
of Research Integrity.
Abstract: The Office of Research
Integrity (ORI) proposes to conduct a
nine-month evaluation study of the
effectiveness of an educational
interactive video on research integrity.
The study seeks to answer two
questions: (a) Objectively, is the
Educational Interactive Video for
Research Integrity (EIVRI) effective in
achieving learning outcomes? (b)
Subjectively, do learners and teachers
perceive the video simulation as
effective in helping them learn and
teach research integrity? To answer the
first question, a pretest-posttest control
group experimental design is used to
assess the effectiveness of individual
learning of research integrity principles
and concepts through the use of the
video simulation. The video simulation
instruction will be incorporated into an
existing syllabus for a research integrity
or research ethics course for the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
treatment group. The control group will
use the existing syllabus with no video
simulation in class. Participants will be
graduate students enrolled in these
ethics courses to learn and apply the
responsible conduct of research at
educational institutions. Participants
will fill out a demographics form to
discern if they have had prior training
experience in research integrity. Those
who have prior training experience and
those who do not have prior training
experience will be randomly assigned to
either the treatment group or the control
group. The random assignment will be
done by picking the last digit of each
individual’s social security number for
the two groups. The video simulation
will be approximately four-hour long
total. All students will take a pre-test
quiz when they fill out the
demographics form. Once the treatment
is completed, all students will be asked
to take a post-test quiz and answer a
post-viewing questionnaire to capture
their perceptions of the video
simulation.
To answer the second question, the
study will collect qualitative data from
semi-structured interviews as well as
focus groups. The semi-structured
interviews will be conducted twice with
faculty who teach the courses in the first
part of the study, in person or on the
phone, before and after he/she uses the
video simulation. Participants for the
focus groups will be selected from the
students who participate in the first part
of the study. The focus group will last
one hour.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
10366
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average burden (in hours)
per response
200
200
200
200
200
10
10
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
20/60
30/60
4
30/60
5/60
6/60
6/60
1
67
100
800
100
17
1
1
9
........................
........................
........................
1,095
Number of
respondents
Forms
Type of respondent
Demographics form ...........................
Pre-test questions .............................
Ethics Instruction ...............................
Post-test questions ...........................
Post-viewing questionnaire ...............
Interview before use of video ...........
Interview after use of video ..............
Focus groups ....................................
Graduate students ............................
Graduate students ............................
Graduate students ............................
Graduate students ............................
Graduate students ............................
Faculty ..............................................
Faculty ..............................................
Graduate students ............................
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
Seleda Perryman,
Office of the Secretary, HHS PRA Clearance
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–4114 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New; 60-day
Notice]
Agency Information Collection
Request; 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed information collection request
for public comment. Interested persons
are invited to send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects:
(1) The necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
AGENCY:
Total burden
hours
patients and care providers across
various segments, this project can
significantly improve the dissemination,
translation, and adoption of evidencebased, outcomes-oriented CER findings.
Comparative Effectiveness Research
(CER) aims to provide patients and their
doctors with the best available evidence
that has been gathered from scientific
research to make effective healthcare
decisions. CER provides the latest
thinking and recommendations on the
risks and benefits of treatment and
diagnostics as well as the confidence of
those recommendations. In addition, it
addresses individual patient factors
such as quality of life and lifestyle that
are included when making decisions
about medical options. Widespread
adoption of CER would lead to better
outcomes for medical treatment and, in
some cases, reduced cost.
The purpose of this project is ‘‘to
strengthen the link between evidence
production and strategies for conveying
this information in ways that encourage
evidence-based behavior change among
providers and patients. The central
question is how best to get CER
information to physicians and patients
in a way they understand. This task is
considered critical to capitalizing on the
Department’s CER investment.’’ This
will be a one year generic clearance
request.
information to be collected; and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, e-mail your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and OS document
identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be directed
to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer
at the above email address within 60
days.
Proposed Project: Provide Services for
the Dissemination of CER to Patients
and Providers To Increase Adoption—
OMB No. 0990–New–Office Within
OS—Assistant Secretary for Planning
and Evaluation (ASPE).
Abstract:
This research leverages best practices
in behavior change, interaction design,
and service innovation to increase the
understanding and adoption of
Comparative Effectiveness Research
(CER) information by physicians and
patients. By truly understanding the
desires, behaviors and attitudes of
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Number of
respondents
Form name
Practice ..............................................
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Type of respondent
Form A: Demographics for target
population and colon cancer
screening rates.
Form B: Tallies when use dashboard and/or show Web-based
tool to patient in office.
Form C: Experience Survey on
web-based tool.
Healthcare Providers (Physicians,
Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants and Nurses).
Individual/patients ..............................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
hours
10
2
4
80
40
563
1/60
375
4750
1
3/60
238
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10365-10366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4114]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS-0990-New; 60-day Notice]
Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS),
Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following
summary of a proposed information collection request for public
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms
for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, e-mail your
request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and OS
document identifier, to Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call the
Reports Clearance Office on (202) 690-6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be
directed to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer at the above email
address within 60-days.
Proposed Project: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Educational
Interactive Video on Research Integrity--OMB No. 0990-New-Office of
Research Integrity.
Abstract: The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) proposes to
conduct a nine-month evaluation study of the effectiveness of an
educational interactive video on research integrity.
The study seeks to answer two questions: (a) Objectively, is the
Educational Interactive Video for Research Integrity (EIVRI) effective
in achieving learning outcomes? (b) Subjectively, do learners and
teachers perceive the video simulation as effective in helping them
learn and teach research integrity? To answer the first question, a
pretest-posttest control group experimental design is used to assess
the effectiveness of individual learning of research integrity
principles and concepts through the use of the video simulation. The
video simulation instruction will be incorporated into an existing
syllabus for a research integrity or research ethics course for the
treatment group. The control group will use the existing syllabus with
no video simulation in class. Participants will be graduate students
enrolled in these ethics courses to learn and apply the responsible
conduct of research at educational institutions. Participants will fill
out a demographics form to discern if they have had prior training
experience in research integrity. Those who have prior training
experience and those who do not have prior training experience will be
randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group.
The random assignment will be done by picking the last digit of each
individual's social security number for the two groups. The video
simulation will be approximately four-hour long total. All students
will take a pre-test quiz when they fill out the demographics form.
Once the treatment is completed, all students will be asked to take a
post-test quiz and answer a post-viewing questionnaire to capture their
perceptions of the video simulation.
To answer the second question, the study will collect qualitative
data from semi-structured interviews as well as focus groups. The semi-
structured interviews will be conducted twice with faculty who teach
the courses in the first part of the study, in person or on the phone,
before and after he/she uses the video simulation. Participants for the
focus groups will be selected from the students who participate in the
first part of the study. The focus group will last one hour.
[[Page 10366]]
Estimated Annualized Burden Table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Forms Type of Number of responses per (in hours) per Total burden
respondent respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demographics form............ Graduate students 200 1 20/60 67
Pre-test questions........... Graduate students 200 1 30/60 100
Ethics Instruction........... Graduate students 200 1 4 800
Post-test questions.......... Graduate students 200 1 30/60 100
Post-viewing questionnaire... Graduate students 200 1 5/60 17
Interview before use of video Faculty.......... 10 1 6/60 1
Interview after use of video. Faculty.......... 10 1 6/60 1
Focus groups................. Graduate students 9 1 1 9
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... ................. .............. .............. .............. 1,095
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seleda Perryman,
Office of the Secretary, HHS PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-4114 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P
