Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband, Interoperable Public Safety Network in the 700 MHz Band, 10295-10299 [2011-4058]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(b) A person registering as a broker
who is already registered as a
manufacturer or exporter in accordance
with part 122 of this subchapter must
cite their existing manufacturer or
exporter registration, and must pay an
additional fee according to the schedule
prescribed in § 122.3(a) for registration
as a broker.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 20, 2011.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–3878 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0252; FRL–9269–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revisions To Control Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions From Consumer
Related Sources
The EPA is proposing to
approve revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that amend
Title 30 of the Texas Administrative
Code (TAC), Chapter 115, Control of Air
Pollution from Volatile Organic
Compounds. The State submitted these
revisions on March 4, 2010. These
revisions remove the Texas Portable
Fuel Container rule as an ozone control
strategy from the Texas SIP for the
Control of Ozone Air Pollution. In the
submittal, Texas demonstrates that
federal portable fuel container standards
promulgated by EPA in 2007 are
expected to provide equal to or greater
emissions reductions than those
resulting from the state regulations. The
EPA is proposing to approve this SIP
revision because it is expected that
reliance on the more stringent federal
portable fuel container standards will
ensure that emission reductions
equivalent to or greater than those in the
repealed Texas portable fuel container
regulations will continue to be achieved
in the State of Texas. Accordingly, it is
expected that this SIP revision will not
have a negative impact neither on the
emission reductions claimed in the
Texas SIP, nor in Texas’ attainment of
the NAAQS for ozone. This SIP revision
eliminates the redundancy that has been
created with the adoption by EPA of the
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
16:43 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
Comments may be mailed to
Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
the direct final rule located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
ADDRESSES:
Ms.
Dayana Medina, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Multimedia Planning and
Permitting Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733, telephone (214) 665–7241; fax
number 214–665–7263; e-mail address
medina.dayana@epa.gov.
In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule, which is located in the
rules section of this Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Written comments must be
received on or before March 28, 2011.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
40 CFR Part 52
SUMMARY:
federal portable fuel container
regulations in 2007. The EPA is
proposing to approve these revisions
pursuant to section 110 of the Federal
Clean Air Act (CAA).
Dated: February 9, 2011.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2011–3994 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10295
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[PS Docket No. 06–229; WT Docket 06–150;
WP Docket 07–100; FCC 11–6]
Implementing a Nationwide,
Broadband, Interoperable Public
Safety Network in the 700 MHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission seeks comments on the
development of a technical
interoperability framework for the
nationwide public safety broadband
network. This document considers and
proposes additional requirements to
further promote and enable nationwide
interoperability among public safety
broadband networks operating in the
700 MHz band. This document
addresses public safety broadband
network interoperability from a
technological perspective and considers
interoperability at various
communication layers.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
April 11, 2011. Submit reply comments
on or before May 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by PS Docket No. 06–229, WT
Docket 06–150 and WP Docket 07–100,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments in the Electronic
Comment Filing System, https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail): Address to 9300 East
Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD
20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail: Address to
FCC Headquarters, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: FCC
Headquarters at 445 12th St., SW., Room
TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Manner, Federal
Communications Commission, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
at (202)–418–3619.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
10296
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
In the
Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, FCC 11–6, adopted January
25, 2011, and released January 26, 2011,
the Commission sought comment on an
initial technical framework for public
safety broadband network
interoperability. The proposed
framework would encompass technical
rules for the network; public safety
roaming on public safety networks;
federal use of the network; testing and
verification to ensure interoperability;
and other matters relevant to ensuring
the interoperability of the network. This
full text of this document is available at
https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/
Daily_Business/2011/db0204/FCC-116A1.pdf.
Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419
of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using: (1) The Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet
by accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number. Filings
can be sent by hand or messenger
delivery, by commercial overnight
courier, or by first-class or overnight
U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings
must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St., SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing
hours are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of
before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express
Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
to 9300 East Hampton Drive,
Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
Procedural Matters
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Fourth Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking contains
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. The Commission, as part of
its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) to comment on the
information collection requirements
contained in this document, as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, Public Law 104–13.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA),1 the Commission
has prepared this present Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
of the possible significant economic
impact on small entities by the policies
and rules proposed in this Fourth
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making
(Fourth Further NPRM). Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA.
Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments provided
herein. The Commission will send a
copy of the Fourth Further NPRM,
including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA).2
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
The rules proposed in the Fourth
Further NPRM are necessary to ensure
the interoperability of 700 MHz public
safety broadband networks that are
expected to be deployed in the near
term. The proposed rules create
technical requirements designed to
ensure that public safety broadband
1 See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq., has been amended by the Contract With
America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
104–121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of
the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA).
2 See 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
networks are technically and
operationally compatible, so that public
safety personnel from various
jurisdictions and departments are able
to communicate effectively over these
networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes
changes to part 90 of the rules.
Specifically, it proposes to:
(1) Develop a regulatory and
operational framework for roaming from
one public safety broadband network to
another.
(2) Require that public safety
broadband networks meet certain
technical requirements designed to
ensure that networks are technically
interoperable or compatible.
(3) Require that public safety
broadband networks meet additional
requirements designed to ensure that
networks achieve a baseline of
operability necessary to support
interoperable communications.
(4) Require public safety broadband
network operators to complete testing
for equipment and user devices
operated on their networks to ensure
conformance with relevant technical
standards and ensure interoperability
between networks.
(5) Make additional minor edits to
part 90.
B. Legal Basis
The proposed action is authorized
under sections 1, 2, 4(i), 5(c), 7, 10, 201,
202, 208, 214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308,
309, 310, 311, 314, 316, 319, 324, 332,
333, 336, 337, 614, 615, and 710 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i),
155(c), 157, 160, 201, 202, 208, 214, 301,
302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314,
316, 319, 324, 332, 333, 336, 337, 614,
615 and 710.
C. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide
a description of and, where feasible, an
estimate of the number of small entities
that may be affected by the proposed
rules, if adopted.3 The RFA generally
defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as having
the same meaning as the terms ‘‘small
business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’ and
‘‘small governmental jurisdiction.’’ 4 In
addition, the term ‘‘small business’’ has
the same meaning as the term ‘‘small
business concern’’ under the Small
Business Act.5 A small business concern
35
U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
U.S.C. 601(6).
5 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the
definition of ‘‘small business concern’’ in 15 U.S.C.
632). Pursuant to the RFA, the statutory definition
of a small business applies ‘‘unless an agency, after
45
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not
dominant in its field of operation; and
(3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA.6
The proposed requirements of the
Fourth Further NPRM would apply to
public safety entities granted authority
from the Commission to pursue
deployment of public safety broadband
networks within their jurisdictions.
The term ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction’’ is defined generally as
‘‘governments of cities, towns,
townships, villages, school districts, or
special districts, with a population of
less than fifty thousand.’’ 7 Census
Bureau data for 2002 indicate that there
were 87,525 local governmental
jurisdictions in the United States.8 We
estimate that, of this total, 84,377
entities were ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions.’’ 9 Thus, we estimate that
most governmental jurisdictions are
small.
We anticipate, however, that the vast
majority of small governmental
jurisdictions will not be directly
authorized to serve as operators of their
own 700 MHz public safety broadband
networks. Rather, we anticipate that
such entities will operate primarily
under authority granted to larger
regional, tribal or national entities to
serve as public safety broadband
network operators.10 Accordingly, we
anticipate that the proposed
requirements that apply directly to
public safety network operators are
unlikely to directly affect a substantial
number of small entities.
consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration and after
opportunity for public comment, establishes one or
more definitions of such term which are
appropriate to the activities of the agency and
publishes such definition(s) in the Federal
Register.’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(3).
6 Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632 (1996).
7 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
8 U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the
United States: 2006, Section 8, p. 272, Table 415.
9 We assume that the villages, school districts,
and special districts are small, and total 48,558. See
U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the
United States: 2006, section 8, p. 273, Table 417.
For 2002, Census Bureau data indicate that the total
number of county, municipal, and township
governments nationwide was 38,967, of which
35,819 were small. Id.
10 We note that none of the twenty-one
jurisdictions that applied for and were granted
conditional waivers for early public safety
broadband network deployment, except one, would
qualify as ‘‘small governmental jurisdictions.’’ See 5
U.S.C. 601(5); see also Requests for Waiver of
Various Petitioners to Allow the Establishment of
700 MHz Interoperable Public Safety Wireless
Broadband Networks, PS Docket 06–229, Order, 25
FCC Rcd 5145, 5147 (2010) (Waiver Order).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes
rule changes that will affect reporting,
recordkeeping and other compliance
requirements. Each of these changes is
described below.
The Fourth Further NPRM, proposes
to require public safety broadband
networks to support roaming from users
of other public safety broadband
networks. This would require network
operators to provide technical roaming
capability within their networks and to
support of minimum set of user
applications.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband
networks to support seamless handover
within the network’s coverage region.
This would require network operators to
implement the technical capability to
support this feature within their
networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband
networks to adhere to a specified out-ofband-emissions requirement. This
would require to public safety network
operators to incorporate the proposed
out-of-band-emissions requirement into
the planning and design of their
networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband
networks to support a minimum set of
applications, namely (1) Internet access;
(2) Virtual Private Network (VPN) access
to any authorized site and to home
networks; (3) a status or information
‘‘homepage;’’ (4) provision of network
access for users under the Incident
Command System; and (5) field-based
server applications. This would require
public safety network operators to
implement the technical capability to
support these applications on their
networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband network
to meet performance requirements,
namely that they provide outdoor
coverage at minimum data rates 768
kbps downlink and 256 kbps uplink, for
all types of devices, for a single user at
the cell edge. Public safety network
operators would need to incorporate
these requirements into the planning
and design of their networks. Public
safety network operators would also be
required to certify to the Public Safety
and Homeland Security Bureau their
compliance with these performance
requirements. These certifications
would need to be based on a
representation of the actual ‘‘as-built’’
network and be accompanied by uplink
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10297
and downlink data rate plots that map
specific performance levels.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband
networks to support specified security
features, namely (1) The LTE signaling
layer security features over the Radio
Resource Control (RRC) protocol layer
(UE and eNodeB); (2) EPC signaling
layer security features over the Non
Access Stratum (NAS) protocol layer
(UE and MME); (3) and user data/
control layer security features over the
Packet Data Convergence Sublayer
(PDCP) protocol layer (UE and eNodeB).
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband
networks to meet coverage and coverage
reliability requirements. Specifically, it
proposes to require public safety
broadband networks to provide outdoor
coverage reliability at a probability of
coverage of 95 percent for all services
and applications throughout the
network. Public safety network
operators would need to incorporate
this requirement into the planning and
design of their networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require each public safety broadband
network operator to notify adjacent or
bordering jurisdictions prior to
deployment, and to allow adjacent or
bordering jurisdictions the opportunity
to negotiate a formal coordination
agreement with the deploying
jurisdiction. Any formal written
agreements would be required to be
submitted to the Bureau.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband network
operators to complete conformance
testing for the devices used on their
network after a testing process for LTE
devices operating in the public safety
broadband spectrum becomes available.
Public safety network operators would
also be required to certify to the
Commission their completion of
conformance testing.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require public safety broadband network
operators to submit plans for completing
interoperability testing with other
public safety broadband networks. The
scope of the testing called for in a
network operator’s plan would be
required to be sufficiently broad to
address all LTE capabilities and
functions required for public safety
broadband waiver recipients. Public
safety network operators would also be
required to certify their performance of
such testing in accordance with their
approved plans.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to
require that public safety LTE devices
support, at minimum, a five megahertz
channel bandwidth. This requirement
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
10298
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
would need to be taken into account
when designing or purchasing devices
for use on public safety broadband
networks.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
The proposed requirements of the
Fourth Further NPRM are designed to
ensure that public safety broadband
networks achieve a baseline of
operability and nationwide
interoperability. In developing these
proposed requirements, the Commission
has made significant efforts to ensure
that the requirements imposed are the
minimum necessary to ensure that
public safety broadband networks are
truly interoperable. As an alternative to
its proposed approach, the Commission
could have proposed more detailed and
burdensome conditions on the design
and implementation of these networks.
The proposed rules seek to balance the
need for flexibility in network design,
cost, and implementation with the
demands of nationwide interoperability.
The establishment of differing
compliance or reporting requirements
for small entities would frustrate the
goal of achieving nationwide
interoperability. Given the importance
of ensuring that public safety broadband
networks are technically and
operationally compatible, it is important
that each network is subject to a
comparable set of rules and
requirements.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rule
None.
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 5(c), 7,
10, 201, 202, 208, 214, 301, 302, 303,
307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 316, 319,
324, 332, 333, 336, 337, 614, 615, and
710 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
155(c), 157, 160, 201, 202, 208, 214, 301,
302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314,
316, 319, 324, 332, 333, 336, and 337,
the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in PS Docket No. 06–229 is
adopted. The Commission’s Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
Reference Information Center, shall
send a copy of the Fourth Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, including the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis,
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry, Civil
defense, Common carriers,
Communications equipment, Emergency
medical services, Individuals with
disabilities, Radio, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 90 as follows:
PART 90—PRIVATE LAND MOBILE
RADIO SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 90
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r),
and 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161,
303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7) unless otherwise
noted.
2. Section 90.7 is amended by adding
the following definitions, Field-Based
Server Applications, Incident Command
System, Internet Access,
Interoperability, Interoperability
Testing, Public Safety Narrowband
Operator, Roamer, Status or Information
Homepage and Virtual Private Network
Access to read as follows:
§ 90.7
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Field-Based Server Applications.
Applications that require client devices
to consistently and continuously reach
server-based systems from any other
location (i.e., field locations) on the
Internet.
*
*
*
*
*
Incident Command System. A
standardized, on-scene, all-hazards
incident management approach that
allows for the integration of facilities,
equipment, personnel, procedures, and
communications operating within a
common organizational structure;
enables a coordinated response among
various jurisdictions and functional
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
agencies, both public and private; and
establishes common processes for
planning and managing resources.
*
*
*
*
*
Internet Access. Access to the global
internet.
*
*
*
*
*
Interoperability. The ability of public
safety agencies to communicate with
one another via radio communications
systems—to exchange voice and/or data
with one another on demand, in real
time, when needed and when
authorized.
Interoperability Testing. Testing to
ensure interoperability between or
among public safety broadband
networks.
*
*
*
*
*
Public Safety Narrowband Operator.
A Public Safety Narrowband Operator is
a public safety entity that is authorized
to operate and has deployed
narrowband operations within the 763–
769 MHz and 793–799 MHz bands.
*
*
*
*
*
Roamer. A mobile station receiving
service from a station or system in the
public safety broadband network other
than one to which it is a subscriber.
*
*
*
*
*
Status or Information Homepage. A
method by which the operator of a host
network provides roamers access to and
distribution of available applications,
alerts, incident-specific information,
system status information, and
information that the operator deems
important to share with roamers on its
system.
*
*
*
*
*
Virtual Private Network Access.
Access to a network, such as a roamer’s
home network, through use of a Virtual
Private Network connection.
3. Section 90.1407 is amended by
adding and reserving paragraphs (d) and
(e) and adding paragraphs (f) through (j)
to read as follows:
§ 90.1407
Spectrum Use in the Network
*
*
*
*
*
(d) [Reserved]
(e) [Reserved]
(f) Public Safety Broadband Network
Operators must submit to the Chief of
the Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau the following
certifications:
(1) Prior to deployment of any Radio
Access Network equipment, a
certification that it will be in
compliance with paragraph (e) of this
section as of the date its network
achieves service availability.
(2) Prior to deployment of any Radio
Access Network equipment, a
certification that it has performed
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2011 / Proposed Rules
interoperability testing on the following
3GPP LTE interfaces: Uu—LTE air
interface, S6a—Visited MME to Home
HSS, S8—Visited SGW to Home PGW
and S9—Visited PCRF to Home PCRF
for dynamic policy arbitration.
(3) Within thirty days of the date its
network achieves service availability, a
certification that its network can
provide a minimum outdoor data rate of
256 Kbps uplink and 768 Kbps
downlink for all types of devices, per
single user at the cell edge.
(4) Six months following the release
of a public notice announcing the
availability of the PTCRB testing process
for 3GPP LTE Band Class 14, a
certification that the devices in use on
its network have gone through and
completed this process.
(g) Out of Band Emissions: Public
Safety Broadband Network Operators
must adhere to the following limitations
on out of band emissions:
(1) On any frequency outside the 763–
768 MHz band, the power of any
emission shall be attenuated outside the
band below the transmitter power (P) by
at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB.
(2) On any frequency outside the 793–
798 MHz band, the power of any
emission shall be attenuated outside the
band below the transmitter power (P) by
at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB.
(h) Public Safety Broadband Network
Operators must support the following
applications: Internet access; Virtual
Private Network access; a status or
information ‘‘homepage;’’ access for
users to the Incident Command System;
and field-based server applications.
(i) Public Safety Broadband Network
Operators must support LTE signaling
layer security features over the Radio
Resource Control (RRC) protocol layer
(UE and eNodeB); EPC signaling layer
security features over the Non-Access
Stratum (NAS) protocol layer (UE and
MME); and user data/control layer
security features over the Packet Data
Convergence Sublayer (PDCP) protocol
layer (UE and eNodeB).
(j) Interference Mitigation. Ninety
days prior to the deployment of any
Radio Access Network equipment, a
Public Safety Broadband Network
Operator must provide notice to all
adjacent or bordering jurisdictions of its
plans for deployment. Any notified
jurisdiction may then request, in
writing, the opportunity to enter a
written frequency coordination
agreement with the operator.
(1) Any such agreement, or
modification to such agreement, must be
submitted to the Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau within 30
days of its execution.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Feb 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
(2) If parties are unable to execute an
agreement within ninety days of the
date a request is made, the parties may
submit the dispute to the Bureau for
resolution.
4. Add § 90.1409 to read as follows:
§ 90.1409 Protection of Incumbent
Narrowband Operations
(a) Ninety days prior to the
deployment of any Radio Access
Network equipment, a Public Safety
Broadband Network Operator must
provide notice to any incumbent Public
Safety Narrowband Operator within its
proposed area of operation or in any
adjacent or bordering jurisdictions of its
plans for deployment. Such notice shall
identify:
(1) The geographic borders within
which the Public Safety Broadband
Network Operator intends to operate;
(2) Any geographic overlap; and
(3) The proposed method of
interference mitigation or notice of their
intent to relocate the incumbent Public
Safety Narrowband Operator.
(b) Any notified jurisdiction shall
respond to a notification under
paragraph (a) of this section within 60
days. Such response shall identify:
(1) The jurisdictions consent to any
proposed interference mitigation or
relocation proposal, and any
counterproposals; and/or
(2) Specific objections to any element
of the notification.
(c) The Public Safety Broadband
Network Operator and Public Safety
Narrowband Operator shall memorialize
such agreements in writing. These
agreements, or modification to such
agreement, must be submitted to the
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau within 30 days of its execution.
(d) Any jurisdictions failing to resolve
any disputes within 90 days following
a response under paragraph (b) of this
section may submit the dispute to the
Bureau for resolution.
[FR Doc. 2011–4058 Filed 2–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2010–0095; MO
92210–0–0008–B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants: 90-Day Finding on a
Petition To List the Wild Plains Bison
or Each of Four Distinct Population
Segments as Threatened
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
10299
Notice of 90-day petition
finding.
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce a 90-day
finding on a petition to list the wild
plains bison (Bison bison bison), or each
of four distinct population segments
(DPSs), as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). Based on our review, we
find that the petition does not present
substantial information indicating that
listing may be warranted. Therefore, we
are not initiating a status review in
response to this petition. However, we
ask the public to submit to us any new
information that becomes available
concerning the status of, or threats to,
the wild plains bison or its habitat at
any time.
DATES: The finding announced in this
document was made on February 24,
2011.
ADDRESSES: This finding is available on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2010–0095. Supporting
documentation we used in preparing
this finding is available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Ecological
Services, Wyoming Field Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Suite 308A,
Cheyenne, WY 82009. Please submit
any new information, materials,
comments, or questions concerning this
finding to the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Sattelberg, Field Supervisor,
Wyoming Field Office (see ADDRESSES),
by telephone (307–772–2374) or by
facsimile (307–772–2358). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that we
make a finding on whether a petition to
list, delist, or reclassify a species
presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted.
We are to base this finding on
information provided in the petition,
supporting information submitted with
the petition, and information otherwise
available in our files. To the maximum
extent practicable, we are to make this
finding within 90 days of our receipt of
the petition, and publish our notice of
the finding promptly in the Federal
Register.
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10295-10299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4058]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[PS Docket No. 06-229; WT Docket 06-150; WP Docket 07-100; FCC 11-6]
Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband, Interoperable Public Safety
Network in the 700 MHz Band
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission seeks comments on the
development of a technical interoperability framework for the
nationwide public safety broadband network. This document considers and
proposes additional requirements to further promote and enable
nationwide interoperability among public safety broadband networks
operating in the 700 MHz band. This document addresses public safety
broadband network interoperability from a technological perspective and
considers interoperability at various communication layers.
DATES: Submit comments on or before April 11, 2011. Submit reply
comments on or before May 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by PS Docket No. 06-229,
WT Docket 06-150 and WP Docket 07-100, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web Site: https://www.fcc.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments in the Electronic Comment Filing
System, https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail): Address to 9300 East Hampton Drive,
Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail: Address to FCC Headquarters, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC
20554.
Hand Delivery/Courier: FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St.,
SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Manner, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
at (202)-418-3619.
[[Page 10296]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, FCC 11-6, adopted January 25, 2011, and released January
26, 2011, the Commission sought comment on an initial technical
framework for public safety broadband network interoperability. The
proposed framework would encompass technical rules for the network;
public safety roaming on public safety networks; federal use of the
network; testing and verification to ensure interoperability; and other
matters relevant to ensuring the interoperability of the network. This
full text of this document is available at https://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0204/FCC-11-6A1.pdf.
Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47
CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply
comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this
document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using
the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or
the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an
original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or
rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery,
by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail
must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (tty).
Procedural Matters
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking contains proposed
information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. The Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the
information collection requirements contained in this document, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),\1\ the
Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small
entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Fourth Further
Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Fourth Further NPRM). Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments
provided herein. The Commission will send a copy of the Fourth Further
NPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., has
been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the
CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA).
\2\ See 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
The rules proposed in the Fourth Further NPRM are necessary to
ensure the interoperability of 700 MHz public safety broadband networks
that are expected to be deployed in the near term. The proposed rules
create technical requirements designed to ensure that public safety
broadband networks are technically and operationally compatible, so
that public safety personnel from various jurisdictions and departments
are able to communicate effectively over these networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes changes to part 90 of the rules.
Specifically, it proposes to:
(1) Develop a regulatory and operational framework for roaming from
one public safety broadband network to another.
(2) Require that public safety broadband networks meet certain
technical requirements designed to ensure that networks are technically
interoperable or compatible.
(3) Require that public safety broadband networks meet additional
requirements designed to ensure that networks achieve a baseline of
operability necessary to support interoperable communications.
(4) Require public safety broadband network operators to complete
testing for equipment and user devices operated on their networks to
ensure conformance with relevant technical standards and ensure
interoperability between networks.
(5) Make additional minor edits to part 90.
B. Legal Basis
The proposed action is authorized under sections 1, 2, 4(i), 5(c),
7, 10, 201, 202, 208, 214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314,
316, 319, 324, 332, 333, 336, 337, 614, 615, and 710 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i),
155(c), 157, 160, 201, 202, 208, 214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309,
310, 311, 314, 316, 319, 324, 332, 333, 336, 337, 614, 615 and 710.
C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Proposed Rules Will Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted.\3\ The RFA generally
defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the
terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small
governmental jurisdiction.'' \4\ In addition, the term ``small
business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern''
under the Small Business Act.\5\ A small business concern
[[Page 10297]]
is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not
dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional
criteria established by the SBA.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
\4\ 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
\5\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition
of ``small business concern'' in 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to the
RFA, the statutory definition of a small business applies ``unless
an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public
comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are
appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such
definition(s) in the Federal Register.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(3).
\6\ Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed requirements of the Fourth Further NPRM would apply to
public safety entities granted authority from the Commission to pursue
deployment of public safety broadband networks within their
jurisdictions.
The term ``small governmental jurisdiction'' is defined generally
as ``governments of cities, towns, townships, villages, school
districts, or special districts, with a population of less than fifty
thousand.'' \7\ Census Bureau data for 2002 indicate that there were
87,525 local governmental jurisdictions in the United States.\8\ We
estimate that, of this total, 84,377 entities were ``small governmental
jurisdictions.'' \9\ Thus, we estimate that most governmental
jurisdictions are small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
\8\ U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United
States: 2006, Section 8, p. 272, Table 415.
\9\ We assume that the villages, school districts, and special
districts are small, and total 48,558. See U.S. Census Bureau,
Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2006, section 8, p. 273,
Table 417. For 2002, Census Bureau data indicate that the total
number of county, municipal, and township governments nationwide was
38,967, of which 35,819 were small. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We anticipate, however, that the vast majority of small
governmental jurisdictions will not be directly authorized to serve as
operators of their own 700 MHz public safety broadband networks.
Rather, we anticipate that such entities will operate primarily under
authority granted to larger regional, tribal or national entities to
serve as public safety broadband network operators.\10\ Accordingly, we
anticipate that the proposed requirements that apply directly to public
safety network operators are unlikely to directly affect a substantial
number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ We note that none of the twenty-one jurisdictions that
applied for and were granted conditional waivers for early public
safety broadband network deployment, except one, would qualify as
``small governmental jurisdictions.'' See 5 U.S.C. 601(5); see also
Requests for Waiver of Various Petitioners to Allow the
Establishment of 700 MHz Interoperable Public Safety Wireless
Broadband Networks, PS Docket 06-229, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 5145, 5147
(2010) (Waiver Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes rule changes that will affect
reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements. Each of
these changes is described below.
The Fourth Further NPRM, proposes to require public safety
broadband networks to support roaming from users of other public safety
broadband networks. This would require network operators to provide
technical roaming capability within their networks and to support of
minimum set of user applications.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
networks to support seamless handover within the network's coverage
region. This would require network operators to implement the technical
capability to support this feature within their networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
networks to adhere to a specified out-of-band-emissions requirement.
This would require to public safety network operators to incorporate
the proposed out-of-band-emissions requirement into the planning and
design of their networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
networks to support a minimum set of applications, namely (1) Internet
access; (2) Virtual Private Network (VPN) access to any authorized site
and to home networks; (3) a status or information ``homepage;'' (4)
provision of network access for users under the Incident Command
System; and (5) field-based server applications. This would require
public safety network operators to implement the technical capability
to support these applications on their networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
network to meet performance requirements, namely that they provide
outdoor coverage at minimum data rates 768 kbps downlink and 256 kbps
uplink, for all types of devices, for a single user at the cell edge.
Public safety network operators would need to incorporate these
requirements into the planning and design of their networks. Public
safety network operators would also be required to certify to the
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau their compliance with these
performance requirements. These certifications would need to be based
on a representation of the actual ``as-built'' network and be
accompanied by uplink and downlink data rate plots that map specific
performance levels.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
networks to support specified security features, namely (1) The LTE
signaling layer security features over the Radio Resource Control (RRC)
protocol layer (UE and eNodeB); (2) EPC signaling layer security
features over the Non Access Stratum (NAS) protocol layer (UE and MME);
(3) and user data/control layer security features over the Packet Data
Convergence Sublayer (PDCP) protocol layer (UE and eNodeB).
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
networks to meet coverage and coverage reliability requirements.
Specifically, it proposes to require public safety broadband networks
to provide outdoor coverage reliability at a probability of coverage of
95 percent for all services and applications throughout the network.
Public safety network operators would need to incorporate this
requirement into the planning and design of their networks.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require each public safety
broadband network operator to notify adjacent or bordering
jurisdictions prior to deployment, and to allow adjacent or bordering
jurisdictions the opportunity to negotiate a formal coordination
agreement with the deploying jurisdiction. Any formal written
agreements would be required to be submitted to the Bureau.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
network operators to complete conformance testing for the devices used
on their network after a testing process for LTE devices operating in
the public safety broadband spectrum becomes available. Public safety
network operators would also be required to certify to the Commission
their completion of conformance testing.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require public safety broadband
network operators to submit plans for completing interoperability
testing with other public safety broadband networks. The scope of the
testing called for in a network operator's plan would be required to be
sufficiently broad to address all LTE capabilities and functions
required for public safety broadband waiver recipients. Public safety
network operators would also be required to certify their performance
of such testing in accordance with their approved plans.
The Fourth Further NPRM proposes to require that public safety LTE
devices support, at minimum, a five megahertz channel bandwidth. This
requirement
[[Page 10298]]
would need to be taken into account when designing or purchasing
devices for use on public safety broadband networks.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives
that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach, which may
include the following four alternatives (among others): (1) The
establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.
The proposed requirements of the Fourth Further NPRM are designed
to ensure that public safety broadband networks achieve a baseline of
operability and nationwide interoperability. In developing these
proposed requirements, the Commission has made significant efforts to
ensure that the requirements imposed are the minimum necessary to
ensure that public safety broadband networks are truly interoperable.
As an alternative to its proposed approach, the Commission could have
proposed more detailed and burdensome conditions on the design and
implementation of these networks. The proposed rules seek to balance
the need for flexibility in network design, cost, and implementation
with the demands of nationwide interoperability.
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements
for small entities would frustrate the goal of achieving nationwide
interoperability. Given the importance of ensuring that public safety
broadband networks are technically and operationally compatible, it is
important that each network is subject to a comparable set of rules and
requirements.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rule
None.
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 5(c), 7, 10, 201, 202, 208, 214,
301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 316, 319, 324, 332, 333,
336, 337, 614, 615, and 710 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 155(c), 157, 160, 201, 202, 208,
214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 314, 316, 319, 324, 332,
333, 336, and 337, the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in
PS Docket No. 06-229 is adopted. The Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry, Civil
defense, Common carriers, Communications equipment, Emergency medical
services, Individuals with disabilities, Radio, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 90 as follows:
PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161,
303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7) unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 90.7 is amended by adding the following definitions,
Field-Based Server Applications, Incident Command System, Internet
Access, Interoperability, Interoperability Testing, Public Safety
Narrowband Operator, Roamer, Status or Information Homepage and Virtual
Private Network Access to read as follows:
Sec. 90.7 Definitions.
* * * * *
Field-Based Server Applications. Applications that require client
devices to consistently and continuously reach server-based systems
from any other location (i.e., field locations) on the Internet.
* * * * *
Incident Command System. A standardized, on-scene, all-hazards
incident management approach that allows for the integration of
facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications
operating within a common organizational structure; enables a
coordinated response among various jurisdictions and functional
agencies, both public and private; and establishes common processes for
planning and managing resources.
* * * * *
Internet Access. Access to the global internet.
* * * * *
Interoperability. The ability of public safety agencies to
communicate with one another via radio communications systems--to
exchange voice and/or data with one another on demand, in real time,
when needed and when authorized.
Interoperability Testing. Testing to ensure interoperability
between or among public safety broadband networks.
* * * * *
Public Safety Narrowband Operator. A Public Safety Narrowband
Operator is a public safety entity that is authorized to operate and
has deployed narrowband operations within the 763-769 MHz and 793-799
MHz bands.
* * * * *
Roamer. A mobile station receiving service from a station or system
in the public safety broadband network other than one to which it is a
subscriber.
* * * * *
Status or Information Homepage. A method by which the operator of a
host network provides roamers access to and distribution of available
applications, alerts, incident-specific information, system status
information, and information that the operator deems important to share
with roamers on its system.
* * * * *
Virtual Private Network Access. Access to a network, such as a
roamer's home network, through use of a Virtual Private Network
connection.
3. Section 90.1407 is amended by adding and reserving paragraphs
(d) and (e) and adding paragraphs (f) through (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.1407 Spectrum Use in the Network
* * * * *
(d) [Reserved]
(e) [Reserved]
(f) Public Safety Broadband Network Operators must submit to the
Chief of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau the following
certifications:
(1) Prior to deployment of any Radio Access Network equipment, a
certification that it will be in compliance with paragraph (e) of this
section as of the date its network achieves service availability.
(2) Prior to deployment of any Radio Access Network equipment, a
certification that it has performed
[[Page 10299]]
interoperability testing on the following 3GPP LTE interfaces: Uu--LTE
air interface, S6a--Visited MME to Home HSS, S8--Visited SGW to Home
PGW and S9--Visited PCRF to Home PCRF for dynamic policy arbitration.
(3) Within thirty days of the date its network achieves service
availability, a certification that its network can provide a minimum
outdoor data rate of 256 Kbps uplink and 768 Kbps downlink for all
types of devices, per single user at the cell edge.
(4) Six months following the release of a public notice announcing
the availability of the PTCRB testing process for 3GPP LTE Band Class
14, a certification that the devices in use on its network have gone
through and completed this process.
(g) Out of Band Emissions: Public Safety Broadband Network
Operators must adhere to the following limitations on out of band
emissions:
(1) On any frequency outside the 763-768 MHz band, the power of any
emission shall be attenuated outside the band below the transmitter
power (P) by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB.
(2) On any frequency outside the 793-798 MHz band, the power of any
emission shall be attenuated outside the band below the transmitter
power (P) by at least 43 + 10 log (P) dB.
(h) Public Safety Broadband Network Operators must support the
following applications: Internet access; Virtual Private Network
access; a status or information ``homepage;'' access for users to the
Incident Command System; and field-based server applications.
(i) Public Safety Broadband Network Operators must support LTE
signaling layer security features over the Radio Resource Control (RRC)
protocol layer (UE and eNodeB); EPC signaling layer security features
over the Non-Access Stratum (NAS) protocol layer (UE and MME); and user
data/control layer security features over the Packet Data Convergence
Sublayer (PDCP) protocol layer (UE and eNodeB).
(j) Interference Mitigation. Ninety days prior to the deployment of
any Radio Access Network equipment, a Public Safety Broadband Network
Operator must provide notice to all adjacent or bordering jurisdictions
of its plans for deployment. Any notified jurisdiction may then
request, in writing, the opportunity to enter a written frequency
coordination agreement with the operator.
(1) Any such agreement, or modification to such agreement, must be
submitted to the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau within 30
days of its execution.
(2) If parties are unable to execute an agreement within ninety
days of the date a request is made, the parties may submit the dispute
to the Bureau for resolution.
4. Add Sec. 90.1409 to read as follows:
Sec. 90.1409 Protection of Incumbent Narrowband Operations
(a) Ninety days prior to the deployment of any Radio Access Network
equipment, a Public Safety Broadband Network Operator must provide
notice to any incumbent Public Safety Narrowband Operator within its
proposed area of operation or in any adjacent or bordering
jurisdictions of its plans for deployment. Such notice shall identify:
(1) The geographic borders within which the Public Safety Broadband
Network Operator intends to operate;
(2) Any geographic overlap; and
(3) The proposed method of interference mitigation or notice of
their intent to relocate the incumbent Public Safety Narrowband
Operator.
(b) Any notified jurisdiction shall respond to a notification under
paragraph (a) of this section within 60 days. Such response shall
identify:
(1) The jurisdictions consent to any proposed interference
mitigation or relocation proposal, and any counterproposals; and/or
(2) Specific objections to any element of the notification.
(c) The Public Safety Broadband Network Operator and Public Safety
Narrowband Operator shall memorialize such agreements in writing. These
agreements, or modification to such agreement, must be submitted to the
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau within 30 days of its
execution.
(d) Any jurisdictions failing to resolve any disputes within 90
days following a response under paragraph (b) of this section may
submit the dispute to the Bureau for resolution.
[FR Doc. 2011-4058 Filed 2-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P