Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List Thorne's Hairstreak Butterfly as Endangered, 9991-10003 [2011-4038]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 11–224; MB Docket No. 11–20; RM–
11619]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Kalispell, MT
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission has before it
a petition for rulemaking filed by
Montana State University, requesting
that we add channel *46, Kalispell,
Montana, which is already allotted to
the Pre-Transition DTV table of
Allotments, to the Post-Transition Table
of DTV Allotments.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before March 25, 2011, and reply
comments on or before April 11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554. In addition to filing comments
with the FCC, interested parties should
serve counsel for petitioner as follows:
Margaret L. Miller, Esq., Dow Lohnes
PLLC, 1200 New Hampshire Avenue,
NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036–
6802.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Y. Denysyk,
adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media
Bureau, (202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
11–20, adopted February 7, 2011, and
released February 9, 2011. The full text
of this document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts (other than
ex parte presentations exempt under 47
CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in
Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments.
See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing
restricted proceedings.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336,
and 339.
§ 73.622
[Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments
under Montana, is amended by adding
channel *46 at Kalispell.
Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2011–4008 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
9991
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2010–0016; MO
92210–0–0008–B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a
Petition To List Thorne’s Hairstreak
Butterfly as Endangered
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition
finding.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce a 12-month
finding on a petition to list Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly (Callophrys
[Mitoura] gryneus thornei) as
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
After review of all available scientific
and commercial information, we find
that listing Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
is not warranted at this time. However,
we ask the public to submit to us any
new information that becomes available
concerning the threats to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly or its habitat at any
time.
DATES: The finding announced in this
document was made on February 23,
2011.
SUMMARY:
This finding is available on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket Number
FWS–R8–ES–2010–0016. Supporting
documentation we used in preparing
this finding is available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the Carlsbad
Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 6010 Hidden Valley
Road, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92011.
Please submit any new information,
materials, comments, or questions
concerning this finding to the above
street address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Bartel, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish
and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 6010 Hidden Valley
Road, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92011; by
telephone at 760–431–9440; or by
facsimile to 760–431–9624. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act)
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
9992
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for
any petition to revise the Federal Lists
of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants that contains substantial
scientific or commercial information
that listing a species may be warranted,
we make a finding within 12 months of
the date of receipt of the petition. In this
finding, we determine whether the
petitioned action is: (a) Not warranted;
(b) warranted; or (c) warranted, but
immediate proposal of a regulation
implementing the petitioned action is
precluded by other pending proposals to
determine whether species are
endangered or threatened, and
expeditious progress is being made to
add or remove qualified species from
the Federal Lists of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Section
4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires that we
treat a petition for which the requested
action is found to be warranted but
precluded as though resubmitted on the
date of such finding, that is, requiring a
subsequent finding to be made within
12 months. We must publish these 12month findings in the Federal Register.
Previous Federal Actions
On August 8, 2006, we published 90day findings for both the Thorne’s
hairstreak and the Hermes copper
butterflies in the Federal Register (71
FR 44980 and 71 FR 44966,
respectively). The findings concluded
that the petitions and information in our
files did not present substantial
scientific or commercial information
indicating that listing Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly or Hermes copper
butterfly may be warranted. For a
detailed history of Federal actions
involving Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
prior to the 2006 90-day finding, please
see the August 8, 2006, Federal Register
publication (71 FR 44980).
On March 17, 2009, Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD) and David
Hogan filed a complaint for declaratory
and injunctive relief challenging the
Service’s decision not to list Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and Hermes copper
butterfly as endangered or threatened
under the Act. In a settlement agreement
dated October 23, 2009 (Case No. 09–
0533 S.D. Cal.), the Service agreed to
submit a new 90-day petition finding for
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly to the
Federal Register by April 2, 2010. As
part of the settlement agreement, we
agreed to evaluate the October 25, 2004,
petition filed by CBD and David Hogan,
supporting information submitted with
the petition, and information available
in the Service’s files, including
information that has become available
since the publication of the negative 90day finding in the Federal Register on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
August 8, 2006. If the 90-day finding
determined that listing may be
warranted, we agreed to submit a 12month finding for Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly to the Federal Register by
March 4, 2011. On April 5, 2010, we
published a 90-day finding that
determined listing of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly as endangered may
be warranted (75 FR 17062). This notice
constitutes the 12-month finding on the
petition to determine whether listing the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly as
endangered is warranted.
Subspecies Information
It is our intent to discuss only those
topics directly relevant to the listing of
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly under the
Act in this 12-month finding. For more
information on the taxonomy, biology,
and ecology of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly, please refer to the 90-day
finding published in the Federal
Register on April 5, 2010 (75 FR 17062).
That document is available on the
Internet at https://www.fws.gov/Carlsbad
and at https://www.regulations.gov
(under docket number FWS–R8–ES–
2010–0016).
Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly was first
described as Mitoura thornei based on a
specimen collected in 1972 near Otay
Lake by Fred Thorne (Brown 1983, p.
246). Biologists questioned the
classification of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly as a species. Shields (1984, p.
53) relegated it to a brown subspecies of
the juniper hairstreak (species or
subspecies name loki) as Mitoura loki
thornei. Scott (1986, p. 374) also
classified it as a subspecies, but under
the name Callophrys gryneus thornei, in
part because he did not consider any
taxa in Mitoura as a genus distinct from
Callophrys. The classification of
Mitoura thornei was evaluated in 1999
by the Committee on Scientific Names
of North American Butterflies
(Committee). The Committee reached
consensus based on publications and
arguments presented, and accepted
classification of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly as a subspecies of the species
Callophrys gryneus (Burns et al. 2000, p.
9). Subsequently, the Committee
prepared the second edition of the
Checklist of English Names of North
American Butterflies in which Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly was classified as
Callophrys gryneus thornei (Cassie et al.
2001, p. 9). Van Buskirk (2004)
reviewed Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
classification for the Service; this review
concurred with the Committee’s
decision to classify Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly as Callophrys gryneus thornei.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The classification of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly continues to be a
focus of investigation. Recent work that
includes mitochondrial DNA and
allozyme analysis indicates that
Thorne’s hairstreak is closely related to
juniper hairstreak (Shiraiwa 2010, p. 1;
Pratt 2010, in press), as originally
suggested by Shields (1984, p. 53).
Pratt’s (2010, in press, p. 9) work also
appears to support classifying Mitoura
as a genus or subgenus, which would
classify Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly as
a subspecies of Mitoura loki (the juniper
hairstreak). Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
has always been classified as a separate
entity at some level (species or
subspecies), and therefore it is a listable
entity under the Act. As described
above, recent work indicates that it is
best classified as a subspecies close to
the juniper hairstreak. The
monophyletic group Mitoura may
warrant recognition as a separate genus
in the future.
In this 12-month finding, we follow
the most recent recommendation from
the North American Butterfly
Association Names Committee (Cassie et
al. 2001, p. 9) and treat Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly as a subspecies
named Callophrys gryneus thornei.
Habitat
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat is
characterized by interior cypress
woodland, also recently known as
Callitropsis forbesii Woodland Alliance
(Tecate cypress stands) (Sawyer et al.
2009, pp. 101–102) dominated by its
host plant, Hesperocyparis forbesii
(Tecate cypress). This habitat is found
on Otay Mountain, intermixed with
chaparral between approximately 800
feet (ft) (244 meters (m)) and 3,290 ft
(1003 m) in elevation (i.e., the mountain
peak). Adult Thorne’s hairstreak
butterflies are known to feed on the
nectar of Eriogonum fasciculatum
(California buckwheat), Ceanothus
tomentosus (Ramona lilac), and Lotus
scoparius (deerweed) in the vicinity of
stands of H. forbesii (Faulkner and Klein
2005, p. 33). A recent study indicates
Asclepias fascicularis (narrowleaf
milkweed) is also used as an adult
nectar source throughout the
subspecies’ range (Lucas 2009, pers.
comm.). It is likely that Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly, like most
butterflies, uses a variety of plant
species as nectar sources, and frequency
of use is primarily dependent on
availability.
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly deposits
eggs and feeds exclusively on its larval
host plant, Hesperocyparis forbesii, to
complete its life cycle (Brown 1983, p.
252). Williams and Congedo (2008)
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
studied aspects of larval host plant use
by Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly. They
recorded number of eggs per H. forbesii
tree, placement of eggs within trees,
location of feeding damage on trees, and
larval food choice, comparing mature
(cone-bearing) trees to immature trees
(no cones) (Williams and Congedo 2008,
pp. 6–13). No significant difference was
found between use of young or recent
shoots (appressed scale leaves and
stems) from mature and immature trees
(Williams and Congedo 2008, pp.
15–18). Williams and Congedo (2008, p.
14) also noted that Thorne’s hairstreak
butterflies occupied stands of trees not
more than 5 years old, and that
approximately 7 percent of new fire
regrowth trees were producing cones.
Williams and Congedo (2008, p. 19)
concluded larvae could develop by
feeding on tissue from immature or
mature trees; thus the availability of
host plants for egg deposition in an
occupied area is not likely limiting.
These results confirm the hypothesis
drawn from adult presence in new postfire growth that oviposition is not
limited by host plant age, as discussed
in the 2006 and 2010 90-day findings
(71 FR 44980 and 75 FR 17062,
respectively). Therefore, the best
available information indicates Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly larvae can utilize
any available life stage of H. forbesii to
complete its life cycle.
Nectar source abundance is also a key
factor in determining Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat suitability.
Van Reusel et al. (2006, pp. 201, 207)
studied a related species of hairstreak
butterfly and, using predictive models,
found that host plant and nectar source
were the primary factors predicting
green hairstreak butterfly distribution.
Nectar sources are critical to support
courtship, mating, and oviposition
behaviors of butterflies such as Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly (Williams and
Congedo 2008, p. 20).
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Biology
The 90-day finding (75 FR 17062;
April 5, 2010) incorrectly characterized
the flight seasons as described in
Faulkner and Klein (1995). Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly has two flight
periods per year (bivoltine). The first
adult emergence and abundance peak
occurs in late February through March
and possibly early April, depending on
winter rainfall. A second adult
abundance peak occurs in late May or
early June, with a possible third in
September if there are summer monsoon
rains (Klein 2010a, p. 1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
Distribution and Population Status
We evaluated available information
on the current range, historical range,
and population status of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly to develop the most
current understanding of its distribution
and status.
Our knowledge of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly’s range has greatly increased
over the past 10 years. The known pre2003 fire distribution of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly approximately
encompassed the northeast quadrant of
Otay Mountain, including locations just
southwest of the peak and a lowerelevation location east of Otay Lakes
(Klein 2010a, p. 2). The 2003 Mine Fire
(also called the Otay Fire) perimeter
encompassed all habitats where
butterflies had been observed; however,
post-fire surveys revealed a cluster of
locations occupied by Thorne’s
hairstreak butterflies in the southwest
quadrant of Otay Mountain outside of
the mapped fire perimeter (Klein 2010a,
p. 11). The 2007 Harris Fire perimeter
encompassed the lower north and east
slopes of Otay Mountain, affecting a
large portion of cypress forest in the
northwest quadrant near Otay Lakes.
Post-2007 fire surveys on Otay
Mountain conducted by Lucas in 2010
included all areas within the species’
range on Otay Mountain except known
historical locations at the easternmost
edge of the species’ range (Lucas 2010),
thus we are uncertain about the current
status of the species at this easternmost
edge of the species range. Only one
stand of trees (that was not a known
historical location for Thorne’s
hairstreak butterflies) was surveyed in
the eastern area; no butterflies were
observed (Lucas 2010; Klein 2010a, pp.
2, 12). Lucas also recorded a new
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly occurrence
location in an area within the northwest
quadrant of Otay Mountain in 2010,
thus expanding the pre-2007 fire known
range (Lucas 2010). The newly
discovered northwestern Otay Mountain
observation location is over 1.5 miles
(mi) (2 kilometers (km)) from the nearest
previous Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
observation in the northeast quadrant
(Lucas 2010; Klein 2010a, pp. 2, 12).
Surveys by Lucas on Otay Mountain
in 2010 revealed the presence of
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly throughout
the majority of Hesperocyparis forbesii
that burned in the 2003 fire, the 2007
fire, and in areas burned by both fires
(unpublished data 2010).
Additionally, the known distribution
of Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly on Otay
Mountain is greater than was known at
the time of the 2004 petition. Therefore,
the persistence of the butterfly in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9993
previously burned areas and the
increase in the known butterfly
distribution indicate that Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly has either
successfully recolonized burned areas or
persisted within mapped fire perimeters
on Otay Mountain.
A previously unknown Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly observation was also
documented in 2010 off of Otay
Mountain at a lower elevation in
approximately 1 ac (0.4 ha) of atypical,
created habitat, which suggests that
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly either has
the ability to recolonize small
Hesperocyparis forbesii stands at lower
elevations or that this observation may
represent a new occurrence that was not
previously documented. Of note, this
new location:
(1) Is in the Otay River Valley, at the
mouth of O’Neal Canyon (Busby 2010a,
pp. 1–2; Cooper 2010a, p. 1) and is
outside the known Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly range;
(2) Is over 2.5 mi (4 km) from, and
over 1000 ft (305 m) lower in elevation
than, the nearest occupied site upslope
at the base of Otay Mountain (as
described by Lucas 2010, slide 15;
Google Earth imagery);
(3) Is approximately 500 ft (152 m)
lower in elevation than the lowest
previously recorded observation east of
Otay Lake (site 5 described by Klein
2010a, p. 2); and
(4) Occurs on land conserved and
managed by the City of Chula Vista,
which is the only known occupied area
located entirely outside of the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Otay
Mountain Wilderness (Klein 2010b, p.
1).
The June 15 (Busby 2010a, pp. 1–2;
Cooper 2010a, p. 1) and June 23, 2010,
(Anderson 2010, p. 1; Cooper 2010b, pp.
1–2) observations of adult butterflies at
the Otay River Valley location are also
the latest ever recorded for Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly during a flight
season (Klein 2010b, p. 1). This late
record is likely the result of unusually
cool spring weather in 2010, creating
prolonged and cooler moist river valley
microclimate conditions. A June 1996
satellite image does not show
Hesperocyparis forbesii stands at this
location (Google Earth historical
imagery accessed 2010). Although we
do not have documentation of how or
why the H. forbesii was established at
this location, analysis of historical
satellite imagery from 1996 to 2010 and
observations of individuals familiar
with the site lead us to believe the trees
were planted as seedlings from a
nursery to replace native vegetation
removed when a gas utility pipeline was
installed in 1996 (Anderson 2010, p. 1;
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
9994
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Cooper 2010b, pp. 1¥2; Busby 2010b, p.
1). Regardless, occupancy of this newly
discovered site in created habitat
supports the hypothesis that Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly is opportunistic and
relatively resilient (i.e., able to persist at
a new, lower elevation level in more
moist microhabitat conditions than
previously known to occur).
Results from a previous hairstreak
butterfly movement study also support
the hypothesis of natural colonization.
Specifically, Robbins and Small (1981,
p. 308) studied movement of hairstreak
butterflies (Lycaenidae: Eumaeini) in
Panama and reported:
(1) Observations of 128 species (47
percent of the known Panamanian
hairstreak butterfly fauna) blown across
the landscape by winds with speeds of
10 to 25 miles per hour (mi/hr) (15 to
40 kilometers per hour (km/hr));
(2) More than 80 percent of these
species were blown through habitats
where they are not normally found;
(3) Some species normally found in
high-elevation habitats were observed 3
mi (5 km) from the nearest upland
habitat; and
(4) Seventy percent of the observed
specimens were females (whereas
typical sex ratios for hairstreak butterfly
populations have more males than
females), and 74 percent of captured
females (a subset of those observed) had
been mated.
Robbins and Small (1981, pp. 311–12)
concluded hairstreak butterflies are
likely to be dispersed by wind and can
successfully colonize suitable
downwind habitats. In southern
California, annual Santa Ana winds
often produce westerly winds of 25 to
37 mi/hr (40 to 60 km/hr) from fall
through spring (Westerling et al. 2004,
p. 290), and likely disperse insects. We
believe this type of wind-assisted
dispersal occurs at Otay Mountain, and
is a likely explanation of how Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly became established
in the Otay River Valley stand of
Hesperocyparis forbesii.
The 90-day finding (75 FR 17062;
April 5, 2010) stated the current
distribution of Hesperocyparis forbesii
in the Otay Mountain area encompasses
454 ac (183 ha) post-2003 fire (Lucas
2009, unpublished data), and compared
this to historical Otay Mountain records
that indicate H. forbesii once covered
approximately 7,500 ac (3,035 ha)
(California Natural Diversity Database
(CNDDB) GIS database 2003). After
further evaluation of all available host
plant distribution information, we
determined the acreage values cannot be
compared as described in the 90-day
finding because the values are a result
of different mapping methodologies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
Data from 2007 revealed that H. forbesii
on Otay Mountain encompasses
approximately 7,556 ac (3,058 ha)
(CNDDB GIS database 2007).
Additionally, the San Diego Association
of Governments (SANDAG) produced a
vegetation map of Southern Interior
Cypress Forest on Otay Mountain equal
to 5,693 ac (2,304 ha) (SANDAG GIS
database, 1995). The smallest and most
recent H. forbesii distribution area
estimate of 454 ac (183 ha) cited in the
90-day finding (75 FR 17062; April 5,
2010) reflects stand-scale mapping
focused on groups of 20 or more trees
greater than 3.3 ft (1 m) in height, with
smaller stands included when
encountered incidentally (Forister and
Lucas 2009, p. 1).
Comparison of the CNDDB and
SANDAG vegetation databases also
indicates differences in mapping
methodology. The two vegetation-based
mapping methods vary in the areas
mapped as occupied by Hesperocyparis
forbesii, with only approximately half
the area mapped in 1995 (SANDAG GIS
database, before the 2003 fire)
overlapping occupied areas mapped in
2007 (CNDDB GIS database, after the
2003 fire). Field inspection of three H.
forbesii stands along the Minewawa
truck trail that were within the 2003 fire
perimeter revealed new growth of
immature cypress throughout (Anderson
2010, p. 1). One H. forbesii location did
not correspond with any location
mapped by Lucas (2010 unpublished
data), while the other two corresponded
with Lucas’s mapped areas and
observed Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
observations (Lucas 2010, unpublished
data). Furthermore, approximately onethird of mapped Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly observation locations fall
outside all three mapped H. forbesii
distributions discussed above.
Our current analysis of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat distribution
indicates most of the habitat is relatively
protected. Approximately 88 percent of
cypress woodland is within the BLM
Otay Mountain Wilderness area, and 11
percent is within the planning area of
the San Diego Subarea Plan under the
San Diego MSCP (see Factor A
discussion below). The remaining one
percent is privately owned. Occupied
habitat within the City of Chula Vista
Subarea Plan planning area is
approximately 1 ac (0.4 ha; see above
discussion).
To summarize, available vegetation
mapping of cypress forest can
approximate the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly population distribution, while
Lucas’ data map of cypress forest (which
is on a stand (sub-population)-scale) is
not yet comprehensive and thus cannot
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
approximate the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly population distribution. It is
not clear if either scale of cypress
mapping corresponds with Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat distribution
at either a butterfly population
distribution or sub-population level. As
a result, we are unable to accurately
estimate the change in distribution of
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat on
Otay Mountain because of the differing
mapping techniques and because
Hesperocyparis forbesii stands are still
recovering from the 2003 and 2007 fires.
Finally, Geographic Information
System (GIS) analysis of historical fire
perimeters indicates the majority of
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat has
burned only once or twice in the past
100 years (see Factor A discussion
below). All available data indicate that
because cypress forest regrows after fire,
and Thorne’s hairstreak butterflies
recolonize cypress forest regardless of
host plant age, the distribution of
habitat has not changed significantly
following the recent fires.
While individual Thorne’s hairstreak
butterflies are likely lost when fire
burns stands of Hesperocyparis forbesii
(as discussed in the 90-day finding (75
FR 17062; April 5, 2010)), more recent
data (discussed above) support the
hypothesis that Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly populations are relatively
resilient to fire. Discovery of occupied
habitat in 2007 and 2010 within the
2003 and 2007 fire perimeters, and the
newly colonized created habitat in 2010
in the Otay River Valley (see above
discussion) indicates Thorne’s
hairstreak butterflies can move
relatively considerable distances,
readily colonize new stands of H.
forbesii, and increase their numbers to
detectable levels over a period of 5 to 10
years. The recently recorded Otay River
Valley location represents a confirmed
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly range
expansion over the past 10 years.
Furthermore, we have no evidence
supporting a permanent range
contraction or curtailment anywhere
throughout the subspecies’ known
distribution.
Summary of Information Pertaining to
the Five Factors
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533)
and implementing regulations (50 CFR
part 424) set forth procedures for adding
species to, removing species from, or
reclassifying species on the Federal
Lists of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants. Under section
4(a)(1) of the Act, a species may be
determined to be endangered or
threatened based on any of the
following five factors:
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(A) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
(C) Disease or predation;
(D) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
(E) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
In making this 12-month finding,
information pertaining to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly in relation to the
five factors provided in section 4(a)(1) of
the Act is discussed below. In making
our 12-month finding on the petition,
we considered and evaluated the best
available scientific and commercial
information.
In considering whether a species
warrants listing under any of the five
factors, we look beyond the species’
exposure to a potential threat or
aggregation of threats under any of the
factors, and evaluate whether the
species responds to those potential
threats in a way that causes actual
impact to the species. The identification
of threats that might impact a species
negatively is not sufficient to compel a
finding that the species warrants listing.
The information must include evidence
indicating that the threats are operative
and, either singly or in aggregation,
affect the status of the species. Threats
are significant if they drive, or
contribute to, the risk of extinction of
the species, such that the species
warrants listing as endangered or
threatened, as those terms are defined in
the Act.
Factor A. The Present or Threatened
Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of Its Habitat or Range
The following potential threats that
may affect the habitat or range of
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly, discussed
in this section, include: (1) Wildfire, (2)
climate change as it relates to wildfire
(climate change is discussed further
under Factor E below), (3) habitat
fragmentation, and (4) road and
firebreak construction required for
national security and fire management
(U.S. Customs and Border Protection)
activities. We also discuss benefits to
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly and its
habitat in the Habitat Conservation
Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community
Conservation Plans (NCCPs) section
below. In the 90-day finding (75 FR
17062; April 5, 2010), we indicated that
based on the petition, recreational
traffic, prescribed burns, and grazing
were potential threats to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly. In the development
of this 12-month finding, we further
investigated the possibility that these
activities were potential threats and
found no evidence that recreational
traffic, prescribed burns, or grazing were
occurring or affecting the species or its
habitat. Therefore, we have determined
that these factors are not threats to the
subspecies (see discussions below under
the Road and Firebreak Construction
section, the Factor D discussion, and the
Factor E discussion).
Wildfire and Climate Change Related to
Wildfire
Fire regimes are based on the
temporal and spatial patterns of ignition
sources, fuel, weather, and topography
(Pyne et al. 1996, p. 48). It is also
important to understand that fire
9995
severity, or the ecological impact of a
fire and recovery of an ecosystem
(Keeley and Fotheringham 2003, p. 231),
can be different from fire intensity, or
the energy released per length of fire
front (Borchart and Odion 1995, p. 92).
Additionally, large fires are not always
equivalent to high-intensity fires
(Keeley and Fotheringham 2003, p. 231).
This is particularly important when
assessing effects of fire on chaparral
communities. Fire often burns in a
mosaic pattern at different intensities,
thereby resulting in differing levels of
effects on particular species and
habitats. Therefore, the inclusion of a
specific mapped fire perimeter is not a
reliable indicator of the level of
mortality or habitat destruction.
According to Keeley and
Fotheringham (2003, pp. 242–243), the
historical natural fire regimes in
southern California were likely
characterized by many small lightningignited fires in the summer, a few large
fires in the fall, and a variable fire
intensity. However, the fire frequency
(number of fires in a given area, not
necessarily overlapping) has increased
in North American Mediterranean
Shrublands in California since about the
1950s. Southern California has
demonstrated the greatest increase in
wildfire ignitions, primarily due to an
increase in population density
beginning in the 1960s, and thus
accessibility to new areas (Keeley and
Fotheringham 2003, p. 240).
We analyzed the past 40 years of fire
patterns at Otay Mountain and found
that the spatial and temporal historical
fire regime described by Keeley and
Fotheringham (2003) is confirmed at
this location as illustrated in Table 1.
TABLE 1—SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL HISTORICAL FIRE REGIME AND FIRE IMPACT ON SOUTHERN INTERIOR CYPRESS
FOREST FOR OTAY MOUNTAIN, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Total fire
perimeter
(acres)
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Year
1971
1976
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1987
1989
1990
1993
1994
1995
1996
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cypress forest
within fire
perimeter
(acres)
Number of
fires
56.04
1,656.05
600.48
7,557.45
3,313.64
371.67
1,076.56
666.87
188.37
965.5
54.71
129.8
63.33
641.76
2,983.35
156.37
18,460.02
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
23FEP1
Cypress forest
within fire
perimeter
(hectares)
18.97
28.68
22.67
1,062.83
36.97
60.5
124.42
106.91
19.14
0.34
3.54
0.06
7.4
24.24
103.09
14.73
4,186.08
7.67
11.6
9.17
430.11
14.96
24.48
50.35
43.26
7.74
0.13
1.43
0.02
2.99
9.81
41.71
5.96
1,694.05
9996
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL HISTORICAL FIRE REGIME AND FIRE IMPACT ON SOUTHERN INTERIOR CYPRESS
FOREST FOR OTAY MOUNTAIN, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA—Continued
Total fire
perimeter
(acres)
Year
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
1999
2003
2005
2007
2008
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
The concern for wildfire effects to
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is
primarily associated with loss of
Hesperocyparis forbesii trees prior to the
production of seed cones, which can
result in the extirpation of a given stand
(see Habitat section above).
Hesperocyparis forbesii is a small tree
generally associated with ‘‘chaparral
ecosystems in southern California and
northern Baja California, Mexico’’ (de
Gouvenain and Ansary 2006, p. 447).
Chaparral is considered a crown-fire
ecosystem, meaning ecosystems which
‘‘have endogenous mechanisms for
recovery that include resprouting from
basal burrs and long-lived seed banks
that are stimulated to germinate by fire’’
(Keane et al. 2008, p. 702). These
ecosystems are also resilient to highintensity burns (Keeley et al. 2008, p.
1545). Seed cones of western cypress
(Hesperocyparis) mature in the second
year, generally remain closed at
maturity, and open after many years or
in response to fire (Adams et al. 2009,
p. 180). As a result, H. forbesii, like most
western cypresses, has serotinous or
closed-cones that allow the species to
withstand fire.
While Zedler (1977, p. 456) indicated
that cone production for Hesperocyparis
forbesii begins around 10 years of age,
Dunn (1986, p. 369) reported production
‘‘begins at about 5–7 years of age, but is
sporadic until the trees reach about 30
years in age.’’ Dispersal and germination
of seeds is predominantly a result of
fire, which results in death of the parent
plant (Zedler 1977, p. 456). However,
Zedler (2010a, pp. 1–2) stated that
‘‘H. forbesii does not require fire to
germinate and establish seedlings,
although the frequency with which
germination without fire occurs in
natural stands is low, and the survival
of seedlings that do germinate is
probably even lower.’’ Moreover, given
that H. forbesii is a long-lived (more
than 100 years) tree (MarkovchickNicholls 2007, p. 4), with some
individual trees on Guatay Mountain
estimated to exceed 150 years in age
(Dunn 1986, p. 369), the need for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
118.48
44,884.10
359.15
90,738.46
124.75
reproduction in the absence of fire is
low.
Hesperocyparis forbesii biology,
status, and management needs were
recently discussed at a workshop on
June 16, 2010 (Burrascano 2010, pp.
1–4). Some attendees indicated that the
H. forbesii stands on Otay Mountain are
declining over the long term and that
increased fire frequency poses a threat
to the tree (Burrascano 2010,
pp. 1–4); however, this assumes a
significant correlation between the
increased fire frequency in southern
California and a decrease in the burn
return interval within any given
occupied cypress stand. Regarding the
likelihood of extirpation, Zedler (2010b,
p. 2) stated that ‘‘it is very unlikely this
species will be [extirpated] in 100 years,
almost zero chance in 50.’’ Specifically,
Zedler (2010b, p. 1) believes the
statistical probability of H. forbesii being
extirpated from Otay Mountain
(assuming relative independence of
stands) is very low or insignificant.
Zedler (2010b, p. 1) also concluded that
as the number of fires in any area of
ground per time increases, the average
area burned in any given fire decreases;
hence, to extirpate H. forbesii
completely would require almost a
saturation of ignitions, which is also
unlikely. This information supports the
unlikely extirpation of H. forbesii in the
foreseeable future.
Regarding the likelihood of decline,
Markovchick-Nicholls (2007, p. v) used
available data and stochastic matrix
population models to assess the current
risk of decline of Hesperocyparis
forbesii under a range of southern
California fire regime scenarios, and to
rank management options and research
priorities. Her model results suggest that
H. forbesii will decline under most fire
regime scenarios over the long term, but
that this trend may be difficult to detect
in the short term (Markovchick-Nicholls
2007, p. 41). Model results indicated
that fire breaks could be highly effective
for H. forbesii conservation, if designed
to minimize removal of H. forbesii
(Markovchick-Nicholls 2007, p. 41). In
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cypress forest
within fire
perimeter
(acres)
Number of
fires
1
1
2
1
2
Cypress forest
within fire
perimeter
(hectares)
11.14
7,548.9
37.94
1,279.76
0.67
4.51
3,054.95
15.35
517.9
0.27
contrast, collection of seed in older
H. forbesii stands for distribution in
reproductively immature stands poses
much less risk to the species, but also
has much less dramatic effects on the
persistence of the species than fire
breaks do, even if successful
(Markovchick-Nicholls 2007, p. 41).
Current BLM policy (BLM 2010a, pp.
6–7) dictates any future firebreak and
road construction projects in Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat on Otay
Mountain minimize impacts to the
butterfly (see also Factor D discussion
below), while reducing the threat of fire
to the subspecies and its host plant by
slowing the spread of fire once ignited.
To address the issue of fire and how
it relates to Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
habitat loss, we conducted several GISbased analyses of past fire frequencies
and burn patterns on Otay Mountain. As
described in the 90-day finding (71 FR
44980; August 8, 2006), we used GIS
data in our files to overlay
Hesperocyparis forbesii distribution on
the map provided in the petition
illustrating multiple fires that have
burned through and near Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly locations over the
past century, and determined the
majority of H. forbesii was within one or
two fire perimeters during the 93-year
period from 1910 to 2003. Furthermore,
as discussed above, the areas of overlap
between the 2003 and 2007 fire
perimeters were relegated to lower
elevation areas where host plant density
is lowest. This result corresponds with
the most conservative fire regime
scenario in the Markovchick-Nicholls
models discussed above (46 years),
which is the scenario where the
population appeared the most stable
(Markovchick-Nicholls 2007, p. 41). The
above information further supports the
unlikely decline or extirpation of
H. forbesii in the foreseeable future.
Using the most recent estimate (based
on 2010 data) of 7,549 ac (3,055 ha)
(CNDDB GIS Database 2010) of cypress
forest on Otay Mountain, we calculated
the overlap for the three largest fires in
the last 15 years (1996, 2003, and 2007).
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
In 1996, 55 percent of cypress forest was
within a mapped fire perimeter. In 2003,
100 percent of the cypress forest was
within the mapped fire perimeter. In
2007, 17 percent of cypress forest was
within the mapped fire perimeter. One
hundred percent of the cypress forest
within the 1996 fire perimeter was also
within the 2003 fire perimeter, whereas
only 17 percent of the area within the
2003 perimeter was also within the 2007
fire perimeter. Over the last 15 years,
only 9 percent of cypress forest was
within all three fire perimeters, and one
approximately 97-ac (39-ha) stand near
the peak within the mapped 2003 fire
perimeter is estimated to have not
burned in approximately 40 years
(Allison 2011, p. 1). The 2007 Harris
Fire perimeter encompassed the lower
north and east slopes of Otay Mountain,
overlapping with the 2003 burn
perimeter primarily around the base of
the mountain, indicating the pattern
observed by Dunn (1984, p. 90) has not
changed significantly over the past 27
years (1983–2010). In 1986, Dunn (p.
374) concluded most of the cypress on
Otay Mountain were reaching full
maturity and a fire would result in little
damage to the population, because it
would in fact result in maximum seed
dispersal and recruitment.
Despite multiple fires over the last
four decades on and around Otay
Mountain (see Table 1), our analysis
confirms Dunn’s conclusion that fire
does not have a significant impact on
the cypress forest on Otay Mountain
(Dunn 1986, p. 374). A recent survey
documented that not all Hesperocyparis
forbesii individuals within mapped fire
perimeters are burned (Anderson 2010,
p. 1). Only 11 of 122 Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly observation locations recorded
in 2010 by Lucas (unpublished data
2010) and only 17 percent of the
associated cypress forest fell within
both the 2003 and 2007 mapped fire
perimeters (Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office GIS database). Throughout the
areas that burned again in 2007, cypress
regrowth and Thorne’s hairstreak
butterflies were observed in 2010.
Furthermore, recent border fence
construction and other enforcement
activities in the Otay Mountain
Wilderness area have reduced foot
traffic by illegal immigrants from
Mexico (Ford 2010, p. 1), reducing the
likelihood of fire ignition resulting from
this source.
As described above, Santa Ana winds
and human-caused ignitions are
important factors in southern
California’s shrubland and forest fire
regimes. Because the Santa Ana wind
events in fall and winter are driven by
large-scale patterns of atmospheric
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
circulation, researchers have developed
projections for Santa Ana Occurrence
(SAO) using global climate models
(GCM) (Miller and Schlegel, 2006, p. 1).
Results obtained from one GCM do not
show an increase in the total number of
annual SAOs; however, they did find a
temporal shift in SAOs, with a decrease
during the months of September and
October and an increase in December
(Miller and Schlegel, 2006, p. 3). The
effects of this shift, coupled with
predicted decreased precipitation (see
Climate Change section in Factor E
discussion below) to fire regime are
unclear; however, December and
January are typically the wettest months
on record in Southern California
(National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration 2005). This temporal
shift of SAOs from a time following the
driest period of the year (May to
October) to after the fall and winter
rains begin (Scripps Institute of
Oceanography 2010) would likely
reduce the potential for and impact of
wind and human-caused ignitions in
southern California.
The output from climate change
models predicts a 50-percent
contraction in mixed evergreen
woodland and shrubland vegetation
(general vegetation types that may
include Hesperocyparis forbesii stands)
in California for the time period from
2070 to 2099 (Lenihan et al. 2003, p.
1674) (for recent information on future
climate predictions, see Factor E
discussion). Lenihan et al. (2003, p.
1674) found that the most prominent
feature of the vegetation class’s response
to the drier model scenario was the
advancement of grassland into the
historical range of mixed evergreen
woodland and shrubland. Such
vegetation changes could reduce host
plant and nectar source availability for
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly, as woody
vegetation declines and grasses replace
native flowering forbs. Based on the
above discussion, nectar source
availability may be a determining factor
in Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
occupancy; however, the general
climate change vegetation effect models
(Lenihan et al. 2003, p. 1674) found the
simulated response to changes in
precipitation were complex, involving
changes in tree-grass competition
mediated by fire.
We are unable to predict the changes
in climate, especially on a localized,
small scale such as Otay Mountain, as
well as what the impacts to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and its habitat may
be because this area is small relative to
the resolution of vegetation change
prediction models (which used climate
models of intermediate scale to predict
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9997
vegetation responses) and contains a
relatively unique community dominated
by the rare endemic cypress (see also
Factor E discussion). While uncertainty
exists regarding the potential effects of
climate change on wildfire and habitat
loss, and despite the increasing
frequency of fires in southern California,
the best available information does not
indicate the average burn return interval
per given area of cypress forest is
decreasing, and it does indicate ignition
sources on Otay Mountain have been
reduced compared to historical levels;
therefore, wildfire has not been, and is
not likely to be, a significant threat to
the Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly or its
habitat now or in the foreseeable future.
Habitat Fragmentation
We examined the possibility of
habitat fragmentation affecting Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly. The connectivity of
habitat occupied by a butterfly
population is not defined by host plant
distribution at the scale of host plant
stands or patches, but rather by adult
butterfly movement that results in
interbreeding (see Service 2003a, pp. 22,
162–165). Any loss of resource
contiguity on the ground that does not
affect butterfly movement, such as
burned vegetation or road construction
through stands of cypress, may degrade
habitat but does not fragment a
population. Therefore, in order for
butterfly habitat to be considered
fragmented, movement must be
prevented by a barrier, or the distance
between remaining host plants where
larvae develop must be greater than
adult butterflies will move to mate or
deposit eggs. If it occurred, habitat
fragmentation might create smaller,
more vulnerable populations (see Factor
E discussion below); however, the best
available information indicates that
habitat fragmentation has not occurred
on Otay Mountain (see Distribution and
Population Status section above).
Hesperocyparis forbesii has
demonstrated an ability to recolonize
after fire events on Otay Mountain, and
data obtained since publication of the
2010 90-day finding (75 FR 17062)
indicate Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is
able disperse through wind events
between any temporarily isolated
patches of H. forbesii (see Distribution
and Population Status section above).
Therefore, we have determined that
habitat fragmentation is not a threat to
the subspecies now, nor is it likely to
become so in the foreseeable future.
Road and Firebreak Construction
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat is
relatively protected from most sources
of habitat destruction, modification, or
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
9998
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
curtailment because approximately 99
percent of its potential habitat (mapped
Interior Cypress Forest vegetation;
CNDDB GIS database 2007) is within
publicly owned areas that are conserved
and managed, primarily within the BLM
Otay Mountain Wilderness and San
Diego Multiple Species Conservation
Program (MSCP) subarea plan preserves
(see Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs)
and Natural Community Conservation
Plans (NCCPs) section and Factor D
discussion below).
Although road and firebreak
construction has occurred in the past in
stands of Hesperocyparis forbesii where
Thorne’s hairstreak butterflies have
been observed, these impacts have been
relatively limited based on our
qualitative comparison of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and host plant
locations with Google Earth satellite
imagery of roads and firebreaks. Because
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
recently completed construction of the
border fence and expanded the
associated ‘‘pack trail’’ into a wider
‘‘truck trail’’ to accommodate vehicles,
the need for further significant Border
Patrol-related construction activities is
not anticipated (Ford 2010, p. 1). Any
future firebreak and road construction
projects that do occur in Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat on Otay
Mountain will be planned so as to
minimize impacts to the butterfly (see
also Factor D below), while reducing the
threat of fire to the subspecies and its
host plant by slowing the spread of fire
once ignited (BLM 2010a, pp. 6–7).
Finally, Williams and Congedo (2008, p.
19) concluded that existing traffic
corridors on Otay Mountain did not
appear to be detrimental to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly unless increasing
human traffic contributes to increasing
fire danger.
The status of the Otay Mountain area
as predominantly wilderness area and
preserve (which are managed) indicates
this area is unlikely to receive increased
legal human traffic. Furthermore, as
noted above, recent border fence
construction and other enforcement
activities in the Otay Mountain
Wilderness area have reduced illegal
human traffic (Ford 2010, p. 1), thereby
reducing the likelihood of fire ignition
by this source. Therefore, road and
firebreak construction is not a
significant threat to the subspecies now,
nor is it likely to become so in the
foreseeable future.
Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and
Natural Community Conservation Plans
(NCCPs)
Habitat conservation plans (HCPs)
and natural community conservation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
plans (NCCPs) benefit Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly through
conservation, management, and
monitoring. Habitat conservation plans
are developed under section 10 of the
Act to support issuance of permits that
authorize the limited incidental take of
listed species in return for conservation
and management of the species and
their habitats. The NCCP program is a
cooperative effort involving the State of
California and numerous private and
public partners to protect regional
habitats and species. The primary
objective of NCCPs is to conserve
natural communities at the ecosystem
scale while accommodating compatible
land uses. NCCPs help identify, and
provide for, the regional or area-wide
protection of plants, animals, and their
habitats while allowing compatible and
appropriate economic activity. Many
NCCPs are developed in conjunction
with HCPs prepared under the Act.
The San Diego Multiple Species
Conservation Program (MSCP) is a
subregional HCP and NCCP made up of
several subarea plans that has been in
place for more than a decade. Under the
umbrella of the MSCP, each of the 12
participating jurisdictions is required to
prepare a subarea plan that implements
the goals of the MSCP within that
particular jurisdiction.
Both Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly and
Hesperocyparis forbesii are covered
species under the County of San Diego
MSCP Subarea Plan, although neither
the butterfly nor H. forbesii are covered
species under the City of Chula Vista
MSCP Subarea Plan. The County of San
Diego MSCP Subarea Plan encompasses
the majority (859 ac (348 ha)) of H.
forbesii habitat (Interior Cypress Forest;
CNDDB GIS database 2007) outside of
the Otay Mountain Wilderness. The
remainder of the H. forbesii habitat
outside of the Otay Mountain
Wilderness (approximately 60 ac (24
ha)) is privately owned in an
Amendment Area for the San Diego
MSCP Planning Area (see discussion
below). Within the County of San Diego
MSCP Subarea Plan, over 99 percent of
H. forbesii habitat (Tecate Cypress
Forest) is planned for conservation and
management (County of San Diego
2008a, Part 3, Section 2, p. 7), and the
majority has already been acquired for
conservation.
As noted above, Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly and Hesperocyparis forbesii are
covered species under the subarea plan
(Service 1998, p. 6), which requires
protection of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly host plants and local chaparral
species used as nectar sources. The
Framework Management Plan for the
County of San Diego Subarea Plan under
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the MSCP (County of San Diego 2008b,
p. 2; Framework Management Plan)
requires the use of specific adaptive
management techniques directed at the
conservation and recovery of covered
species, such as actions that assure
wildfires do not occur too frequently in
areas where species are sensitive to fire.
The Framework Management Plan also
provides for biological monitoring and
preparation of an annual report, and
based upon this review and biological
monitoring effort, adjustments in the
management goals can be made as
necessary (County of San Diego 2008b,
p. 2). Because Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is required to be conserved and
adaptively managed and monitored
under the County of San Diego Subarea
Plan, we anticipate land management to
protect Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly and
its habitat will continue to be
implemented under the County of San
Diego Subarea Plan.
Additionally, the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) on cooperation in
habitat conservation planning and
management issued by BLM in 1994, in
conjunction with the development of
the County of San Diego Subarea Plan
under the MSCP (BLM 1994, pp. 1–8),
also applies to the Otay Mountain
Wilderness because it falls entirely
within the boundary of this subarea
plan. As outlined in the MOU (BLM
1994, p. 3), BLM is committed to
managing their lands (i.e., Otay
Mountain Wilderness) to ‘‘conform
with’’ the County of San Diego Subarea
Plan, which in turn requires protection
of Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly’s larval
host plant, Hesperocyparis forbesii, and
local chaparral species used as nectar
sources. Therefore, protections provided
by the County of San Diego Subarea
Plan under the MSCP to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and its habitat also
apply to the Otay Mountain Wilderness.
The 90-day finding (75 FR 17062;
April 5, 2010) states, ‘‘Approximately 48
ac (19 ha) of Hesperocyparis forbesii
habitat fall under the [County of San
Diego Subarea Plan], which strives for
fire management and prevention to
restore the previous 25-year [burn return
interval]’’; however, we have since
determined this statement is not
accurate. The statement was based on
the 1994 BLM South Coast Resource
Management Plan that specifies a
minimum planned 25-year burn return
interval for controlled burns in H.
forbesii habitat ‘‘east of the Minewawa
truck trail on the Otay Mountain
[Wilderness]’’ (BLM 1994, p. 21). The
Minewawa Truck Trail runs from the
peak at Doghouse Junction, north to
Otay Lakes Road, dividing the northern
half of Otay Mountain into east and
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
west quarters. As discussed above, per
an MOU, BLM has committed to manage
its lands in a manner that complements
the County of San Diego Subarea Plan;
this management commitment was
mistakenly attributed to that HCP in the
90-day finding. The 48-ac (19-ha)
estimate was based on the area of H.
forbesii stands mapped by Lucas
(Forister and Lucas 2009, pp. 1–2) and
located outside the Otay Mountain
Wilderness. Therefore, the 48-ac (19-ha)
area estimate is not accurate with regard
to the amount of H. forbesii habitat (see
Distribution and Population Status
section above) that is managed by the
County of San Diego. Our estimate of
the habitat managed by the County of
San Diego under their subarea plan is
859 ac (348 ha) (see discussion above).
Finally, BLM does not have any plans
to conduct controlled burns (see Factor
D discussion below) nor is it committed
to maintain a 25-year burn return
interval for such burns (BLM 1994, p.
21), and the County of San Diego
Subarea Plan includes the assurance
that wildfires will not occur too
frequently in areas where species are
sensitive to fire. The BLM draft revised
South Coast Resource Management Plan
specifically includes a goal of restoring
burn return interval to 50 years through
fire prevention or suppression and
prescribed burns (see Factor D
discussion below). Current BLM
prescribed burn practices preclude
burning of any H. forbesii habitat that
would not enhance cypress stand
viability or that would negatively affect
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly (see Factor
D discussion below). Therefore, the
misrepresented regulatory 25-year burn
return interval issue is not a valid
concern with regard to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly conservation.
The City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan
under the MSCP includes a preserve
that encompasses the newly discovered
Otay River Valley occupied site (see
Distribution and Population Status
section above). Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly and Hesperocyparis forbesii are
not covered species under this subarea
plan. However, all lands preserved
under the Chula Vista Subarea Plan are
adaptively managed and maintained to:
(1) Ensure the long-term viability and
sustainability of native ecosystem
function and natural processes
throughout the Preserve;
(2) Protect existing and restored
biological resources from the impacts of
human activities within the Preserve
while accommodating compatible uses;
(3) Enhance and restore, where
feasible, appropriate native plant
associations and wildlife connections to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
adjoining habitat to provide viable
wildlife and sensitive species habitat;
(4) Facilitate monitoring of selected
target species, habitats, and linkages to
ensure long-term persistence of viable
populations of priority plant and animal
species; and
(5) Ensure functional habitats and
linkages for those species (Service
2003b, pp.18, 70, FWS–SDG–882.1).
We believe these management
prescriptions adequately protect
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly and its
habitat within the preserve, and the
adaptive management measures of the
Chula Vista Subarea Plan allow for
adjustment of preserve management, as
appropriate, to conserve this newly
discovered population of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly.
One relatively small area of occupied
cypress forest (approximately 60 ac (24
ha) composed of four butterfly
observation locations) in the southwest
foothills of Otay Mountain east of Otay
Mesa is privately owned and not within
an approved subarea plan, but falls
within the MSCP planning area where a
new subarea plan is being developed
(i.e., a County of San Diego MSCP
‘‘Amendment Area’’) (CNDDB GIS
Database 2010). While these habitats are
not currently protected from threats to
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat by
conservation or management, the
majority of this area is also occupied by
the endangered Quino checkerspot
butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino),
and Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat
is therefore already afforded some
indirect protection under section 9 of
the Act.
Summary of Factor A
We evaluated several factors with the
potential to destroy, modify, or curtail
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly’s habitat or
range, including decreasing burn return
intervals, climate change related to
wildfire, habitat fragmentation, and road
and firebreak construction. We also
evaluated the benefits to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and its habitat
associated with HCPs and NCCPs.
Wildfire can negatively affect the
species’ habitat and in particular its host
plant. However, our analysis does not
indicate wildfire events have deviated
from historical fire frequency or burn
return interval patterns. Despite two
recent large fires (2003 and 2007),
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly has not
only survived or recolonized habitats
within mapped recent fire perimeters, it
has expanded its range. In addition,
while uncertainty exists regarding the
potential effects of climate change on
wildfire and habitat loss, the best
available information regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9999
decreased burn return interval indicates
the indirect effects of climate change on
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat are
not threats to the subspecies now, nor
are they predicted for the future. We
have also determined the best available
information indicates habitat
fragmentation does not occur within the
range of Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly.
We further determined that impacts to
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly habitat
resulting from road and firebreak
construction have been relatively
limited and are not anticipated to
increase in the future. Additionally,
approximately 99 percent of all
potential Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
habitat (cypress woodland within
existing County of San Diego Subarea
Plan preserves, the City of Chula Vista
Subarea Plan preserve, and Otay
Mountain Wilderness Area) is
conserved and managed to benefit both
the species and its host plant. Therefore,
we believe existing HCPs and NCCPs
provide protection for Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat. Based on
our review of the best available
scientific and commercial information,
we conclude that Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is not threatened by the
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range now or in the
foreseeable future.
Factor B. Overutilization for
Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
We have no information to indicate
that overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes is currently a threat to the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly, nor do we
anticipate that it will become a threat in
the future. Therefore, based on our
review of the best available scientific
and commercial information, we
conclude that Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is not threatened by
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes now or in the foreseeable
future.
Factor C. Disease or Predation
Disease
Our review of the best available
scientific and commercial data found
nothing to indicate that disease is a
threat to Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
now or in the foreseeable future.
Predation
Predation (including parasitism) is a
factor that is known to cause mortality
in butterflies, and therefore could
potentially threaten any butterfly
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
10000
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
species. Faulkner and Klein (2005, p.
34) stated that birds may consume
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly larvae,
although we are not aware of any data
that indicate bird predation is a
significant threat to Thorne’s hairstreak
butterflies. Brachonid wasps (parasitoid
insects that deposit eggs in their host
and kill it when offspring emerge as
adults) have been observed near the host
plant, but there has been no
documentation of predation on Thorne’s
hairstreak butterflies (Faulkner and
Klein 2005, p. 34; Klein 2010a p, 5). One
potential larval predator observed
during the 2007 season in large numbers
at one occupied site is the nonnative
seven-spotted ladybird beetle
(Coccinella septempuctata) (Klein
2010a, pp. 5, 12); however, we are not
aware of any data indicating the beetles
have negative effects on Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly.
Heavy predation and parasitism of
adult insects and their progeny is a
common ecological phenomenon, and
most species have evolved under
conditions where high mortality due to
natural enemies has shaped their
evolution (see Schmid-Hempel 1995, p.
255; Ehrlich et al. 1998). Our review did
not reveal any specific information
regarding predation of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterflies, nor do we have
any indication that predation will
become a threat in the foreseeable
future. Therefore, based on our review
of the best available scientific and
commercial information, we conclude
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is not
threatened by predation either now or in
the foreseeable future.
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Factor D. The Inadequacy of Existing
Regulatory Mechanisms
The Act requires us to examine the
adequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms with respect to threats that
may place Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
in danger of extinction or likely to
become so in the future. Existing
regulatory mechanisms that may have
an effect on potential threats to Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly can be placed into
two general categories: (1) Federal
mechanisms, and (2) State mechanisms.
Federal Mechanisms
The Otay Mountain Wilderness Act
(1999) (Pub. L. 106–145) and BLM
management policies provide protection
for the majority of occupied Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat (over 90
percent of all recorded butterfly
observation locations). The Otay
Mountain Wilderness Act directs that
the Otay Mountain designated
wilderness area (i.e., Otay Mountain
Wilderness; 18,500 ac (7,486 ha)) be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
managed in accordance with the
provisions of the Wilderness Act of
1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.). The
Wilderness Act of 1964 strictly limits
use of wilderness areas, imposing
restrictions on vehicle use, new
developments, chainsaws, mountain
bikes, leasing, and mining, in order to
protect the natural habitats of the areas,
maintain species diversity, and enhance
biological values. Lands acquired by
BLM within the Otay Mountain
Wilderness boundaries become part of
the designated wilderness area and are
managed in accordance with all
provisions of the Wilderness Act and
applicable laws (for additional
information on applicable laws and
management of the Otay Mountain
Wilderness, see discussions below).
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is a
BLM-designated sensitive species (BLM
2010b, p. 3). BLM-designated sensitive
species are those species requiring
special management consideration to
promote their conservation and reduce
the likelihood and need for future
listing under the Act. This status makes
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
conservation a management priority in
the Otay Mountain Wilderness (see BLM
2008, p. 6).
Fire management activities occur on
Otay Mountain as part of the BLM’s
current (1994) South Coast Resource
Management Plan. Available
information provided by BLM
summarizes these ongoing management
actions (Howe 2010, p. 1):
(a) The California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)
San Diego Unit is under a contractual
agreement to provide fire suppression
services to BLM-administered Public
Lands in San Diego County;
(b) Planned fire dispatch for the Otay
Mountains Wilderness is five engines,
two handcrews, two tanker airplanes,
two to three water-drop helicopters, and
assorted command and support
personnel;
(c) BLM Fire Management provides an
Initial Attack Dispatch and Agency
Representative to ensure appropriate
actions are taken on a fire incident;
(d) On large incidents, several
Resource Specialists may form a team to
evaluate fire and fire suppression
effects. If a determination is made to
pursue fire restoration and repair, these
specialists would work with Burned
Area Emergency Response (BAER)
Teams to implement appropriate
actions;
(e) Fire Prevention and Law
Enforcement patrols occur on Otay
Mountain, and the Lyons Peak Lookout
Tower (north of the Otay Mountain
Wilderness) will reopen to facilitate
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
early fire detection as soon as funding
allows (Allison 2011, p. 1); and
(f) The International Fuelbreak is
under a Right-of-Way Agreement with
CAL FIRE.
At some point in the future on an asneeded basis, additional brush clearing
and other fuels modifications, including
burning, may occur; however, no plans
exist to perform prescribed burns in
groves of Hesperocyparis forbesii at this
time. Any prescribed burning in the
future within the Otay Mountain
Wilderness would be designed to
promote conservation of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and reduce the
likelihood and need for future listing of
the subspecies under the Act (see above
discussion of BLM-designated sensitive
species for more information).
Specifically, any future prescribed
burns in cypress forest would be limited
to low-level understory burns designed
to minimize impacts to H. forbesii and
would only occur where mature trees
have reached maximum cone
production and burning would likely
increase stand viability (Allison 2011, p.
1). Currently, all cypress stands on Otay
Mountain are within fire perimeters
mapped over the past 10 years;
however, there is one approximately 97ac (39-ha) stand near the peak that is
approximately 40 years old, where
burning could be prescribed if wildfire
does not burn it within the next 10 to
15 years (Allison 2011, p. 1).
We believe the current management
regime undertaken by BLM under the
existing plan is adequate to protect the
subspecies and its habitat from threats.
However, BLM is collaborating with the
Service to revise the South Coast
Resource Management Plan, which
covers the Otay Mountain Wilderness.
In the current draft revised plan,
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly and
Hesperocyparis forbesii are identified as
sensitive species (BLM 2009, p. 3–59),
and the plan specifically states the
management of these species and their
habitats are important because of their
close association and the importance of
fire cycles to their continued existence.
Moreover, one of BLM’s primary
objectives in the draft revised plan is
improved fire management and
collaboration with local communities
and agencies to prevent wildfires. The
draft revised plan specifically includes
a goal of restoring fire frequency to 50
years through fire prevention or
suppression and prescribed burns; once
an area has not burned for 50 years the
plan allows for annual prescribed
burning of up to 500 ac (202 ha) in the
Otay Mountain Wilderness (BLM 2009,
pp. 4–171¥4–172). Actions
implemented under the revised plan,
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
when final, will be designed to promote
conservation of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly and its habitat.
State Mechanisms
The California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) requires review of any
project that is undertaken, funded, or
permitted by the State or a local
governmental agency. If significant
environmental effects are identified, the
lead agency has the option of requiring
mitigation through changes in the
project or deciding that overriding
considerations make mitigation
infeasible (CEQA section 21002).
Therefore, protection of sensitive native
species through CEQA is dependent
upon the discretion of the lead agency
involved. The implementation of CEQA
encourages protection of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and Hesperocyparis
forbesii where projects are undertaken,
funded, or permitted by the State or a
local governmental agency outside of
the Otay Mountain Wilderness, and by
CAL FIRE within the wilderness area.
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
Summary of Factor D
We considered the adequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms to
protect Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly.
The majority (approximately 90 percent)
of potential Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
habitat is within the BLM Otay
Mountain Wilderness, and is conserved
and managed to benefit both the species
and its host plant. With regard to
wildfire in the Otay Mountain
Wilderness: (1) Prevention activities are
already a focus of management and
occur regularly; (2) suppression
activities are already a focus of
management and occur promptly; and
(3) if fire is not frequent enough to
reduce fuel load, prescribed burns can
occur. Therefore, we believe existing
regulatory mechanisms already provide
ample regulatory protection of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly from the potential
threat of wildfire (see Factor A above for
a discussion of wildfire). Based on our
review of the best available scientific
and commercial information, we
conclude Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is
not threatened by the inadequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms now,
nor is it likely to become so in the
foreseeable future.
Factor E. Other Natural or Manmade
Factors Affecting The Species’
Continued Existence
Natural and manmade threats to the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly include
wildfire, small population size, and
climate change. Wildfire is briefly
discussed under this factor, and wildfire
and climate change related to wildfire
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
are discussed in detail under Factor A
discussion above. The 90-day finding
(75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010) also
indicated that grazing and population
fragmentation were potential threats to
the subspecies. In the development of
this 12-month finding, we further
investigated these potential threats and
found that grazing does not currently
occur on Otay Mountain, nor is it
planned for the future (Doran 2010, p.
1; Ford 2010, p. 1; Schlachter 2010, p.
1); therefore, it is not a threat to the
subspecies at this time, nor is it likely
to become so in the foreseeable future.
We also determined that population
fragmentation for Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is dependent on habitat
fragmentation, which is discussed above
under Factor A, and is not a threat to the
species at this time or in the foreseeable
future.
Wildfire
As discussed under Factor A above,
wildfire can be a risk factor for Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and its host plant
and nectar sources. However, as
discussed above under Factor D,
existing fire prevention and suppression
activities are already in place to
minimize the impacts of fire on this
species to the maximum extent
practicable, and measures are being
taken to improve such activities.
Although Thorne’s hairstreak butterflies
can be killed by wildfire, the best
available information indicates Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly habitat is relatively
resilient and can re-colonize areas after
fire events.
Small Population Size
Although we do not have data from
which to draw conclusions regarding
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly population
size, we nonetheless considered
whether rarity might pose a potential
threat to the species. While small
populations are generally at greater risk
of extirpation from normal population
fluctuations due to predation, disease,
changing food supply, and stochastic
(random) events such as fire,
corroborating information regarding
threats beyond rarity is needed to meet
the information threshold indicating
that the species may warrant listing. In
the absence of information identifying
threats to the species and linking those
threats to the rarity of the species, the
Service does not consider rarity alone to
be a threat. Further, a species that has
always had small population sizes or
has always been rare, yet continues to
survive, could be well-equipped to
continue to exist into the future.
Many naturally rare species have
persisted for long periods within small
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10001
geographic areas, and many naturally
rare species exhibit traits that allow
them to persist despite their small
population sizes. Consequently, the fact
that a species is rare or has small
populations does not necessarily
indicate that it may be in danger of
extinction now or in the foreseeable
future. We need to consider specific
potential threats that might be
exacerbated by rarity or small
population size. Although low genetic
variability and reduced fitness from
inbreeding could occur, at this time we
have no evidence of genetic problems
with the Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly.
Based on the available information, and
the fact that Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly has survived for an unknown
number of years, we conclude that
genetic variability and reduced fitness
are not imminent threats now, nor do
we believe they will become threats in
the foreseeable future. Although we
have only known of its existence since
1972 (Brown 1983, p. 246), Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly has always been
endemic to Otay Mountain (Brown
1983; Beztler et al. 2003; Faulkner and
Klein 2005) and has historically
survived fires, drought, and other
stochastic events. Therefore, we have no
data to indicate that rarity or small
population size, in and of themselves,
pose a threat to the subspecies at this
time or in the foreseeable future.
Climate Change
Downscaled local climate model
predictions for Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly range indicate a warmer, drier
climate in the vicinity of Otay Mountain
(downscaled resolution corresponds to
the area of Otay Mountain; The Nature
Conservancy Climate Wizard 2010).
Climate Wizard (The Nature
Conservancy 2010) model calculations
and predictions for Otay Mountain
indicate that the average annual
temperature has increased
approximately 0.06 degrees Fahrenheit
(°F) (0.03 degrees Celsius (°C)) per year
for the past 50 years (p>.001), will likely
increase another 5 °F (2.8 °C) in the next
40 years (medium and high scenarios),
and will increase another 6.5 to 7.5 °F
(3.6 to 4.2 °C) within the next 70 years
(medium and high scenarios). Otay
Mountain average annual precipitation
has decreased 0 to 0.1 percent per year
over the past 50 years (p=1), is predicted
to decrease by up to 7 percent over the
next 40 years, and is predicted to
decrease by up to 12 to 13 percent over
the next 70 years (medium and high
scenarios; The Nature Conservancy
Climate Wizard 2010). These
environmental factors are the primary
driver of (similar but likely at a greater
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
10002
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
scale) models that predict increased fire
frequency and scope, and possible
Hesperocyparis forbesii population
decline (see Factor A discussion above).
However, the models are general and do
not enable us to conclude that host
plant populations would decline
significantly or to predict a decrease of
the specific host plants used by
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly. It is not
clear how predicted environmental
changes would directly affect Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and its habitat (i.e.,
the H. forbesii) due to the uncertainty of
the models. We are unable to estimate
any direct climate change effects to
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly
populations because the climate
tolerances of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly are unknown, although they
seem to do well at all climate extremes
within their current range (all
elevations). Because we believe the
available modeling information on a
potential decrease in the H. forbesii
population (as described above) is too
general to be a reliable source to predict
changes in the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly population, we are relying on
the ecology of the host plant and Zedler
(2010) to help us ascertain the
likelihood of the loss of the host plant
and thus Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly.
Specifically (and as described in the
Wildfire and Climate Change Related to
Wildfire section above), Zedler (2010b,
p. 2) concluded that it is unlikely the
species would be extirpated in 100 years
in part because the statistical probability
of H. forbesii being extirpated from Otay
Mountain is very low or insignificant.
Therefore, the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly’s distribution seems currently,
and likely to remain limited by the
distribution of its host plant rather than
climate. Thus there is no indication that
changes in climate would affect the
distribution of Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly. Unlike models used to predict
vegetation changes (such as those
described above under Factor A), no
niche models or similar analyses have
been conducted to determine potential
direct (climate suitability) or indirect
effects (effects of climate on habitat
suitability) to the butterfly. Therefore,
available data is not adequate to
evaluate the potential direct effects of
predicted climate changes on Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly or to indicate that
the species is currently in danger of
extinction now or in the foreseeable
future.
Based on a review of the best
available scientific and commercial data
regarding wildfire, small population
size, and climate change, we found no
reliable evidence that other natural or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
manmade factors affecting the
continued existence of the Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly are a threat to the
subspecies either now or in the
foreseeable future.
Summary of the Five Factors
This status review found no
significant threats to Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly related to Factors A, B, C, D,
or E, as described above.
We find that the best available
information for Factor A, including
information on the potential effects of
wildfire, climate change related to
wildfire, habitat fragmentation, and road
and firebreak construction, and the
beneficial effects of HCPs and NCCPs,
indicates that Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is not threatened by the
present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range. Analysis of historical
fire patterns on Otay Mountain and
recolonization of habitat following fire
indicate wildfire and road and fire break
construction has not fragmented or
reduced habitat in occupied areas.
While uncertainty exists regarding the
potential effects of climate change on
wildfire and habitat loss, the best
available information regarding
decreased burn return interval indicates
this is not a significant threat to the
subspecies. Furthermore, habitat
conservation plans (HCPs) and natural
community conservation plans (NCCPs)
benefit Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly,
Hesperocyparis forbesii, and their
habitat through conservation,
management, and preservation.
The available information concerning
overutilization (Factor B) and predation
(Factor C) does not indicate that the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is
threatened by these factors. We find that
the best available information
concerning Factor D (Inadequacy of
Existing Regulatory Mechanisms)
indicates that the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is not threatened by the
inadequacy of existing regulations.
Finally, we find that the best available
information concerning Factor E (Other
Natural or Manmade Factors Affecting
the Species’ Continued Existence)
indicates that the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is not threatened individually
or cumulatively by the effects of
wildfire, small population size, or
climate change. Post-fire surveys
indicate Thorne’s hairstreak butterflies
recolonized all habitat affected by large
fires in 2003 and 2007 that had
previously been documented to be
occupied (this excluded the recently
discovered stand within the City of
Chula Vista Subarea Plan because it was
discovered after the fires), indicating
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that the butterfly is not restricted to
isolated patches. Additionally, available
data do not suggest that rarity or small
population size, in and of themselves,
pose a threat to the subspecies at this
time or in the foreseeable future.
Finding
As required by the Act, we conducted
a review of the status of the Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly and considered the
five factors in assessing whether the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is in
danger of extinction or likely to become
so in the foreseeable future throughout
all or a significant portion of its range.
We examined the best scientific and
commercial information available
regarding the past, present, and future
threats faced by the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly. We reviewed the petition,
information available in our files, and
other available published and
unpublished information, and we
consulted with experts knowledgeable
about Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly,
habitat experts, and representatives
from the BLM and local jurisdictions.
During our status review for this
species, it has become evident that
many threat issues are speculative or are
associated with predicted future climate
changes, with no historical or current
documented direct impacts to the
species or its habitat relating to these
issues. Our review of the best available
scientific and commercial information
pertaining to the five threat factors does
not support a conclusion that there are
independent or cumulative threats of
sufficient imminence, intensity, or
magnitude to indicate that Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly is in danger of
extinction (endangered), or likely to
become endangered within the
foreseeable future (threatened),
throughout its range. Therefore, we have
determined that the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly does not meet the definition of
an endangered species or a threatened
species under the Act and, as a result,
does not warrant listing under the Act
at this time.
Significant Portion of the Range
Having determined that Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly does not meet the
definition of an endangered or a
threatened species, we must next
consider whether there are any
significant portions of the range where
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly is in
danger of extinction or is likely to
become endangered in the foreseeable
future.
On the basis of our review, we found
no geographic concentration of threats
either on public or private lands to
suggest that Thorne’s hairstreak
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS
butterfly may be in danger of extinction
in that portion of its range. We found no
area within the range of Thorne’s
hairstreak butterfly where the potential
threats are significantly concentrated or
substantially greater than in other
portions of the range. Therefore, we find
factors affecting the subspecies are
essentially uniform throughout its
range, indicating no portion of the
butterfly’s range warrants further
consideration of possible endangered or
threatened status under the Act.
We find that the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly is not in danger of extinction
now, nor is it likely to become
endangered within the foreseeable
future, throughout all or a significant
portion of its range. Therefore, listing
the Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Feb 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
endangered or threatened under the Act
is not warranted at this time.
We request that you submit any new
information concerning the status of, or
threats to, the Thorne’s hairstreak
butterfly to our Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES section)
whenever it becomes available. New
information will help us monitor the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly and
encourage management of this
subspecies and its habitat. If an
emergency situation develops for the
Thorne’s hairstreak butterfly or any
other species, we will act to provide
immediate protection.
References Cited
A complete list of references cited is
available on the Internet at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
10003
www.regulations.gov and upon request
from the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Authors
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff members of the Carlsbad Fish
and Wildlife Office.
Authority
The authority for this section is
section 4 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: February 10, 2011.
Rowan W. Gould,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–4038 Filed 2–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9991-10003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4038]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2010-0016; MO 92210-0-0008-B2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding
on a Petition To List Thorne's Hairstreak Butterfly as Endangered
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce a 12-month
finding on a petition to list Thorne's hairstreak butterfly (Callophrys
[Mitoura] gryneus thornei) as endangered under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act). After review of all available scientific
and commercial information, we find that listing Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly is not warranted at this time. However, we ask the public to
submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the
threats to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly or its habitat at any time.
DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on February 23,
2011.
ADDRESSES: This finding is available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket Number FWS-R8-ES-2010-0016. Supporting
documentation we used in preparing this finding is available for public
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6010
Hidden Valley Road, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92011. Please submit any
new information, materials, comments, or questions concerning this
finding to the above street address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Bartel, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad
Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6010 Hidden
Valley Road, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92011; by telephone at 760-431-
9440; or by facsimile to 760-431-9624. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act)
[[Page 9992]]
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for any petition to revise the
Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants that
contains substantial scientific or commercial information that listing
a species may be warranted, we make a finding within 12 months of the
date of receipt of the petition. In this finding, we determine whether
the petitioned action is: (a) Not warranted; (b) warranted; or (c)
warranted, but immediate proposal of a regulation implementing the
petitioned action is precluded by other pending proposals to determine
whether species are endangered or threatened, and expeditious progress
is being made to add or remove qualified species from the Federal Lists
of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Section 4(b)(3)(C) of
the Act requires that we treat a petition for which the requested
action is found to be warranted but precluded as though resubmitted on
the date of such finding, that is, requiring a subsequent finding to be
made within 12 months. We must publish these 12-month findings in the
Federal Register.
Previous Federal Actions
On August 8, 2006, we published 90-day findings for both the
Thorne's hairstreak and the Hermes copper butterflies in the Federal
Register (71 FR 44980 and 71 FR 44966, respectively). The findings
concluded that the petitions and information in our files did not
present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating
that listing Thorne's hairstreak butterfly or Hermes copper butterfly
may be warranted. For a detailed history of Federal actions involving
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly prior to the 2006 90-day finding, please
see the August 8, 2006, Federal Register publication (71 FR 44980).
On March 17, 2009, Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and David
Hogan filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief
challenging the Service's decision not to list Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly and Hermes copper butterfly as endangered or threatened under
the Act. In a settlement agreement dated October 23, 2009 (Case No. 09-
0533 S.D. Cal.), the Service agreed to submit a new 90-day petition
finding for Thorne's hairstreak butterfly to the Federal Register by
April 2, 2010. As part of the settlement agreement, we agreed to
evaluate the October 25, 2004, petition filed by CBD and David Hogan,
supporting information submitted with the petition, and information
available in the Service's files, including information that has become
available since the publication of the negative 90-day finding in the
Federal Register on August 8, 2006. If the 90-day finding determined
that listing may be warranted, we agreed to submit a 12-month finding
for Thorne's hairstreak butterfly to the Federal Register by March 4,
2011. On April 5, 2010, we published a 90-day finding that determined
listing of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly as endangered may be warranted
(75 FR 17062). This notice constitutes the 12-month finding on the
petition to determine whether listing the Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
as endangered is warranted.
Subspecies Information
It is our intent to discuss only those topics directly relevant to
the listing of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly under the Act in this 12-
month finding. For more information on the taxonomy, biology, and
ecology of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly, please refer to the 90-day
finding published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2010 (75 FR
17062). That document is available on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/Carlsbad and at https://www.regulations.gov (under docket
number FWS-R8-ES-2010-0016).
Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly was first described as Mitoura
thornei based on a specimen collected in 1972 near Otay Lake by Fred
Thorne (Brown 1983, p. 246). Biologists questioned the classification
of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly as a species. Shields (1984, p. 53)
relegated it to a brown subspecies of the juniper hairstreak (species
or subspecies name loki) as Mitoura loki thornei. Scott (1986, p. 374)
also classified it as a subspecies, but under the name Callophrys
gryneus thornei, in part because he did not consider any taxa in
Mitoura as a genus distinct from Callophrys. The classification of
Mitoura thornei was evaluated in 1999 by the Committee on Scientific
Names of North American Butterflies (Committee). The Committee reached
consensus based on publications and arguments presented, and accepted
classification of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly as a subspecies of the
species Callophrys gryneus (Burns et al. 2000, p. 9). Subsequently, the
Committee prepared the second edition of the Checklist of English Names
of North American Butterflies in which Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
was classified as Callophrys gryneus thornei (Cassie et al. 2001, p.
9). Van Buskirk (2004) reviewed Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
classification for the Service; this review concurred with the
Committee's decision to classify Thorne's hairstreak butterfly as
Callophrys gryneus thornei.
The classification of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly continues to be
a focus of investigation. Recent work that includes mitochondrial DNA
and allozyme analysis indicates that Thorne's hairstreak is closely
related to juniper hairstreak (Shiraiwa 2010, p. 1; Pratt 2010, in
press), as originally suggested by Shields (1984, p. 53). Pratt's
(2010, in press, p. 9) work also appears to support classifying Mitoura
as a genus or subgenus, which would classify Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly as a subspecies of Mitoura loki (the juniper hairstreak).
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly has always been classified as a separate
entity at some level (species or subspecies), and therefore it is a
listable entity under the Act. As described above, recent work
indicates that it is best classified as a subspecies close to the
juniper hairstreak. The monophyletic group Mitoura may warrant
recognition as a separate genus in the future.
In this 12-month finding, we follow the most recent recommendation
from the North American Butterfly Association Names Committee (Cassie
et al. 2001, p. 9) and treat Thorne's hairstreak butterfly as a
subspecies named Callophrys gryneus thornei.
Habitat
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat is characterized by interior
cypress woodland, also recently known as Callitropsis forbesii Woodland
Alliance (Tecate cypress stands) (Sawyer et al. 2009, pp. 101-102)
dominated by its host plant, Hesperocyparis forbesii (Tecate cypress).
This habitat is found on Otay Mountain, intermixed with chaparral
between approximately 800 feet (ft) (244 meters (m)) and 3,290 ft (1003
m) in elevation (i.e., the mountain peak). Adult Thorne's hairstreak
butterflies are known to feed on the nectar of Eriogonum fasciculatum
(California buckwheat), Ceanothus tomentosus (Ramona lilac), and Lotus
scoparius (deerweed) in the vicinity of stands of H. forbesii (Faulkner
and Klein 2005, p. 33). A recent study indicates Asclepias fascicularis
(narrowleaf milkweed) is also used as an adult nectar source throughout
the subspecies' range (Lucas 2009, pers. comm.). It is likely that
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly, like most butterflies, uses a variety of
plant species as nectar sources, and frequency of use is primarily
dependent on availability.
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly deposits eggs and feeds exclusively
on its larval host plant, Hesperocyparis forbesii, to complete its life
cycle (Brown 1983, p. 252). Williams and Congedo (2008)
[[Page 9993]]
studied aspects of larval host plant use by Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly. They recorded number of eggs per H. forbesii tree, placement
of eggs within trees, location of feeding damage on trees, and larval
food choice, comparing mature (cone-bearing) trees to immature trees
(no cones) (Williams and Congedo 2008, pp. 6-13). No significant
difference was found between use of young or recent shoots (appressed
scale leaves and stems) from mature and immature trees (Williams and
Congedo 2008, pp. 15-18). Williams and Congedo (2008, p. 14) also noted
that Thorne's hairstreak butterflies occupied stands of trees not more
than 5 years old, and that approximately 7 percent of new fire regrowth
trees were producing cones. Williams and Congedo (2008, p. 19)
concluded larvae could develop by feeding on tissue from immature or
mature trees; thus the availability of host plants for egg deposition
in an occupied area is not likely limiting. These results confirm the
hypothesis drawn from adult presence in new post-fire growth that
oviposition is not limited by host plant age, as discussed in the 2006
and 2010 90-day findings (71 FR 44980 and 75 FR 17062, respectively).
Therefore, the best available information indicates Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly larvae can utilize any available life stage of H. forbesii to
complete its life cycle.
Nectar source abundance is also a key factor in determining
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat suitability. Van Reusel et al.
(2006, pp. 201, 207) studied a related species of hairstreak butterfly
and, using predictive models, found that host plant and nectar source
were the primary factors predicting green hairstreak butterfly
distribution. Nectar sources are critical to support courtship, mating,
and oviposition behaviors of butterflies such as Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly (Williams and Congedo 2008, p. 20).
Biology
The 90-day finding (75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010) incorrectly
characterized the flight seasons as described in Faulkner and Klein
(1995). Thorne's hairstreak butterfly has two flight periods per year
(bivoltine). The first adult emergence and abundance peak occurs in
late February through March and possibly early April, depending on
winter rainfall. A second adult abundance peak occurs in late May or
early June, with a possible third in September if there are summer
monsoon rains (Klein 2010a, p. 1).
Distribution and Population Status
We evaluated available information on the current range, historical
range, and population status of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly to
develop the most current understanding of its distribution and status.
Our knowledge of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly's range has greatly
increased over the past 10 years. The known pre-2003 fire distribution
of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly approximately encompassed the
northeast quadrant of Otay Mountain, including locations just southwest
of the peak and a lower-elevation location east of Otay Lakes (Klein
2010a, p. 2). The 2003 Mine Fire (also called the Otay Fire) perimeter
encompassed all habitats where butterflies had been observed; however,
post-fire surveys revealed a cluster of locations occupied by Thorne's
hairstreak butterflies in the southwest quadrant of Otay Mountain
outside of the mapped fire perimeter (Klein 2010a, p. 11). The 2007
Harris Fire perimeter encompassed the lower north and east slopes of
Otay Mountain, affecting a large portion of cypress forest in the
northwest quadrant near Otay Lakes. Post-2007 fire surveys on Otay
Mountain conducted by Lucas in 2010 included all areas within the
species' range on Otay Mountain except known historical locations at
the easternmost edge of the species' range (Lucas 2010), thus we are
uncertain about the current status of the species at this easternmost
edge of the species range. Only one stand of trees (that was not a
known historical location for Thorne's hairstreak butterflies) was
surveyed in the eastern area; no butterflies were observed (Lucas 2010;
Klein 2010a, pp. 2, 12). Lucas also recorded a new Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly occurrence location in an area within the northwest quadrant
of Otay Mountain in 2010, thus expanding the pre-2007 fire known range
(Lucas 2010). The newly discovered northwestern Otay Mountain
observation location is over 1.5 miles (mi) (2 kilometers (km)) from
the nearest previous Thorne's hairstreak butterfly observation in the
northeast quadrant (Lucas 2010; Klein 2010a, pp. 2, 12).
Surveys by Lucas on Otay Mountain in 2010 revealed the presence of
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly throughout the majority of Hesperocyparis
forbesii that burned in the 2003 fire, the 2007 fire, and in areas
burned by both fires (unpublished data 2010).
Additionally, the known distribution of Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly on Otay Mountain is greater than was known at the time of the
2004 petition. Therefore, the persistence of the butterfly in
previously burned areas and the increase in the known butterfly
distribution indicate that Thorne's hairstreak butterfly has either
successfully recolonized burned areas or persisted within mapped fire
perimeters on Otay Mountain.
A previously unknown Thorne's hairstreak butterfly observation was
also documented in 2010 off of Otay Mountain at a lower elevation in
approximately 1 ac (0.4 ha) of atypical, created habitat, which
suggests that Thorne's hairstreak butterfly either has the ability to
recolonize small Hesperocyparis forbesii stands at lower elevations or
that this observation may represent a new occurrence that was not
previously documented. Of note, this new location:
(1) Is in the Otay River Valley, at the mouth of O'Neal Canyon
(Busby 2010a, pp. 1-2; Cooper 2010a, p. 1) and is outside the known
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly range;
(2) Is over 2.5 mi (4 km) from, and over 1000 ft (305 m) lower in
elevation than, the nearest occupied site upslope at the base of Otay
Mountain (as described by Lucas 2010, slide 15; Google Earth imagery);
(3) Is approximately 500 ft (152 m) lower in elevation than the
lowest previously recorded observation east of Otay Lake (site 5
described by Klein 2010a, p. 2); and
(4) Occurs on land conserved and managed by the City of Chula
Vista, which is the only known occupied area located entirely outside
of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Otay Mountain Wilderness (Klein
2010b, p. 1).
The June 15 (Busby 2010a, pp. 1-2; Cooper 2010a, p. 1) and June 23,
2010, (Anderson 2010, p. 1; Cooper 2010b, pp. 1-2) observations of
adult butterflies at the Otay River Valley location are also the latest
ever recorded for Thorne's hairstreak butterfly during a flight season
(Klein 2010b, p. 1). This late record is likely the result of unusually
cool spring weather in 2010, creating prolonged and cooler moist river
valley microclimate conditions. A June 1996 satellite image does not
show Hesperocyparis forbesii stands at this location (Google Earth
historical imagery accessed 2010). Although we do not have
documentation of how or why the H. forbesii was established at this
location, analysis of historical satellite imagery from 1996 to 2010
and observations of individuals familiar with the site lead us to
believe the trees were planted as seedlings from a nursery to replace
native vegetation removed when a gas utility pipeline was installed in
1996 (Anderson 2010, p. 1;
[[Page 9994]]
Cooper 2010b, pp. 1-2; Busby 2010b, p. 1). Regardless, occupancy of
this newly discovered site in created habitat supports the hypothesis
that Thorne's hairstreak butterfly is opportunistic and relatively
resilient (i.e., able to persist at a new, lower elevation level in
more moist microhabitat conditions than previously known to occur).
Results from a previous hairstreak butterfly movement study also
support the hypothesis of natural colonization. Specifically, Robbins
and Small (1981, p. 308) studied movement of hairstreak butterflies
(Lycaenidae: Eumaeini) in Panama and reported:
(1) Observations of 128 species (47 percent of the known Panamanian
hairstreak butterfly fauna) blown across the landscape by winds with
speeds of 10 to 25 miles per hour (mi/hr) (15 to 40 kilometers per hour
(km/hr));
(2) More than 80 percent of these species were blown through
habitats where they are not normally found;
(3) Some species normally found in high-elevation habitats were
observed 3 mi (5 km) from the nearest upland habitat; and
(4) Seventy percent of the observed specimens were females (whereas
typical sex ratios for hairstreak butterfly populations have more males
than females), and 74 percent of captured females (a subset of those
observed) had been mated.
Robbins and Small (1981, pp. 311-12) concluded hairstreak
butterflies are likely to be dispersed by wind and can successfully
colonize suitable downwind habitats. In southern California, annual
Santa Ana winds often produce westerly winds of 25 to 37 mi/hr (40 to
60 km/hr) from fall through spring (Westerling et al. 2004, p. 290),
and likely disperse insects. We believe this type of wind-assisted
dispersal occurs at Otay Mountain, and is a likely explanation of how
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly became established in the Otay River
Valley stand of Hesperocyparis forbesii.
The 90-day finding (75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010) stated the current
distribution of Hesperocyparis forbesii in the Otay Mountain area
encompasses 454 ac (183 ha) post-2003 fire (Lucas 2009, unpublished
data), and compared this to historical Otay Mountain records that
indicate H. forbesii once covered approximately 7,500 ac (3,035 ha)
(California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) GIS database 2003).
After further evaluation of all available host plant distribution
information, we determined the acreage values cannot be compared as
described in the 90-day finding because the values are a result of
different mapping methodologies. Data from 2007 revealed that H.
forbesii on Otay Mountain encompasses approximately 7,556 ac (3,058 ha)
(CNDDB GIS database 2007). Additionally, the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG) produced a vegetation map of Southern Interior
Cypress Forest on Otay Mountain equal to 5,693 ac (2,304 ha) (SANDAG
GIS database, 1995). The smallest and most recent H. forbesii
distribution area estimate of 454 ac (183 ha) cited in the 90-day
finding (75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010) reflects stand-scale mapping
focused on groups of 20 or more trees greater than 3.3 ft (1 m) in
height, with smaller stands included when encountered incidentally
(Forister and Lucas 2009, p. 1).
Comparison of the CNDDB and SANDAG vegetation databases also
indicates differences in mapping methodology. The two vegetation-based
mapping methods vary in the areas mapped as occupied by Hesperocyparis
forbesii, with only approximately half the area mapped in 1995 (SANDAG
GIS database, before the 2003 fire) overlapping occupied areas mapped
in 2007 (CNDDB GIS database, after the 2003 fire). Field inspection of
three H. forbesii stands along the Minewawa truck trail that were
within the 2003 fire perimeter revealed new growth of immature cypress
throughout (Anderson 2010, p. 1). One H. forbesii location did not
correspond with any location mapped by Lucas (2010 unpublished data),
while the other two corresponded with Lucas's mapped areas and observed
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly observations (Lucas 2010, unpublished
data). Furthermore, approximately one-third of mapped Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly observation locations fall outside all three
mapped H. forbesii distributions discussed above.
Our current analysis of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat
distribution indicates most of the habitat is relatively protected.
Approximately 88 percent of cypress woodland is within the BLM Otay
Mountain Wilderness area, and 11 percent is within the planning area of
the San Diego Subarea Plan under the San Diego MSCP (see Factor A
discussion below). The remaining one percent is privately owned.
Occupied habitat within the City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan planning
area is approximately 1 ac (0.4 ha; see above discussion).
To summarize, available vegetation mapping of cypress forest can
approximate the Thorne's hairstreak butterfly population distribution,
while Lucas' data map of cypress forest (which is on a stand (sub-
population)-scale) is not yet comprehensive and thus cannot approximate
the Thorne's hairstreak butterfly population distribution. It is not
clear if either scale of cypress mapping corresponds with Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly habitat distribution at either a butterfly
population distribution or sub-population level. As a result, we are
unable to accurately estimate the change in distribution of Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly habitat on Otay Mountain because of the differing
mapping techniques and because Hesperocyparis forbesii stands are still
recovering from the 2003 and 2007 fires.
Finally, Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis of historical
fire perimeters indicates the majority of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
habitat has burned only once or twice in the past 100 years (see Factor
A discussion below). All available data indicate that because cypress
forest regrows after fire, and Thorne's hairstreak butterflies
recolonize cypress forest regardless of host plant age, the
distribution of habitat has not changed significantly following the
recent fires.
While individual Thorne's hairstreak butterflies are likely lost
when fire burns stands of Hesperocyparis forbesii (as discussed in the
90-day finding (75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010)), more recent data
(discussed above) support the hypothesis that Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly populations are relatively resilient to fire. Discovery of
occupied habitat in 2007 and 2010 within the 2003 and 2007 fire
perimeters, and the newly colonized created habitat in 2010 in the Otay
River Valley (see above discussion) indicates Thorne's hairstreak
butterflies can move relatively considerable distances, readily
colonize new stands of H. forbesii, and increase their numbers to
detectable levels over a period of 5 to 10 years. The recently recorded
Otay River Valley location represents a confirmed Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly range expansion over the past 10 years. Furthermore, we have
no evidence supporting a permanent range contraction or curtailment
anywhere throughout the subspecies' known distribution.
Summary of Information Pertaining to the Five Factors
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and implementing regulations
(50 CFR part 424) set forth procedures for adding species to, removing
species from, or reclassifying species on the Federal Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Under section 4(a)(1) of
the Act, a species may be determined to be endangered or threatened
based on any of the following five factors:
[[Page 9995]]
(A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
(B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
(C) Disease or predation;
(D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
(E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
In making this 12-month finding, information pertaining to Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly in relation to the five factors provided in
section 4(a)(1) of the Act is discussed below. In making our 12-month
finding on the petition, we considered and evaluated the best available
scientific and commercial information.
In considering whether a species warrants listing under any of the
five factors, we look beyond the species' exposure to a potential
threat or aggregation of threats under any of the factors, and evaluate
whether the species responds to those potential threats in a way that
causes actual impact to the species. The identification of threats that
might impact a species negatively is not sufficient to compel a finding
that the species warrants listing. The information must include
evidence indicating that the threats are operative and, either singly
or in aggregation, affect the status of the species. Threats are
significant if they drive, or contribute to, the risk of extinction of
the species, such that the species warrants listing as endangered or
threatened, as those terms are defined in the Act.
Factor A. The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of Its Habitat or Range
The following potential threats that may affect the habitat or
range of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly, discussed in this section,
include: (1) Wildfire, (2) climate change as it relates to wildfire
(climate change is discussed further under Factor E below), (3) habitat
fragmentation, and (4) road and firebreak construction required for
national security and fire management (U.S. Customs and Border
Protection) activities. We also discuss benefits to Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly and its habitat in the Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and
Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) section below. In the 90-
day finding (75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010), we indicated that based on
the petition, recreational traffic, prescribed burns, and grazing were
potential threats to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly. In the development
of this 12-month finding, we further investigated the possibility that
these activities were potential threats and found no evidence that
recreational traffic, prescribed burns, or grazing were occurring or
affecting the species or its habitat. Therefore, we have determined
that these factors are not threats to the subspecies (see discussions
below under the Road and Firebreak Construction section, the Factor D
discussion, and the Factor E discussion).
Wildfire and Climate Change Related to Wildfire
Fire regimes are based on the temporal and spatial patterns of
ignition sources, fuel, weather, and topography (Pyne et al. 1996, p.
48). It is also important to understand that fire severity, or the
ecological impact of a fire and recovery of an ecosystem (Keeley and
Fotheringham 2003, p. 231), can be different from fire intensity, or
the energy released per length of fire front (Borchart and Odion 1995,
p. 92). Additionally, large fires are not always equivalent to high-
intensity fires (Keeley and Fotheringham 2003, p. 231). This is
particularly important when assessing effects of fire on chaparral
communities. Fire often burns in a mosaic pattern at different
intensities, thereby resulting in differing levels of effects on
particular species and habitats. Therefore, the inclusion of a specific
mapped fire perimeter is not a reliable indicator of the level of
mortality or habitat destruction.
According to Keeley and Fotheringham (2003, pp. 242-243), the
historical natural fire regimes in southern California were likely
characterized by many small lightning-ignited fires in the summer, a
few large fires in the fall, and a variable fire intensity. However,
the fire frequency (number of fires in a given area, not necessarily
overlapping) has increased in North American Mediterranean Shrublands
in California since about the 1950s. Southern California has
demonstrated the greatest increase in wildfire ignitions, primarily due
to an increase in population density beginning in the 1960s, and thus
accessibility to new areas (Keeley and Fotheringham 2003, p. 240).
We analyzed the past 40 years of fire patterns at Otay Mountain and
found that the spatial and temporal historical fire regime described by
Keeley and Fotheringham (2003) is confirmed at this location as
illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1--Spatial and Temporal Historical Fire Regime and Fire Impact on Southern Interior Cypress Forest for
Otay Mountain, San Diego County, California
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cypress Cypress
Total fire forest within forest within
Year perimeter Number of fire fire
(acres) fires perimeter perimeter
(acres) (hectares)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1971............................................... 56.04 1 18.97 7.67
1976............................................... 1,656.05 1 28.68 11.6
1978............................................... 600.48 1 22.67 9.17
1979............................................... 7,557.45 3 1,062.83 430.11
1980............................................... 3,313.64 1 36.97 14.96
1981............................................... 371.67 1 60.5 24.48
1982............................................... 1,076.56 4 124.42 50.35
1983............................................... 666.87 2 106.91 43.26
1985............................................... 188.37 1 19.14 7.74
1986............................................... 965.5 1 0.34 0.13
1987............................................... 54.71 1 3.54 1.43
1989............................................... 129.8 1 0.06 0.02
1990............................................... 63.33 1 7.4 2.99
1993............................................... 641.76 1 24.24 9.81
1994............................................... 2,983.35 1 103.09 41.71
1995............................................... 156.37 2 14.73 5.96
1996............................................... 18,460.02 5 4,186.08 1,694.05
[[Page 9996]]
1999............................................... 118.48 1 11.14 4.51
2003............................................... 44,884.10 1 7,548.9 3,054.95
2005............................................... 359.15 2 37.94 15.35
2007............................................... 90,738.46 1 1,279.76 517.9
2008............................................... 124.75 2 0.67 0.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The concern for wildfire effects to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
is primarily associated with loss of Hesperocyparis forbesii trees
prior to the production of seed cones, which can result in the
extirpation of a given stand (see Habitat section above).
Hesperocyparis forbesii is a small tree generally associated with
``chaparral ecosystems in southern California and northern Baja
California, Mexico'' (de Gouvenain and Ansary 2006, p. 447). Chaparral
is considered a crown-fire ecosystem, meaning ecosystems which ``have
endogenous mechanisms for recovery that include resprouting from basal
burrs and long-lived seed banks that are stimulated to germinate by
fire'' (Keane et al. 2008, p. 702). These ecosystems are also resilient
to high-intensity burns (Keeley et al. 2008, p. 1545). Seed cones of
western cypress (Hesperocyparis) mature in the second year, generally
remain closed at maturity, and open after many years or in response to
fire (Adams et al. 2009, p. 180). As a result, H. forbesii, like most
western cypresses, has serotinous or closed-cones that allow the
species to withstand fire.
While Zedler (1977, p. 456) indicated that cone production for
Hesperocyparis forbesii begins around 10 years of age, Dunn (1986, p.
369) reported production ``begins at about 5-7 years of age, but is
sporadic until the trees reach about 30 years in age.'' Dispersal and
germination of seeds is predominantly a result of fire, which results
in death of the parent plant (Zedler 1977, p. 456). However, Zedler
(2010a, pp. 1-2) stated that ``H. forbesii does not require fire to
germinate and establish seedlings, although the frequency with which
germination without fire occurs in natural stands is low, and the
survival of seedlings that do germinate is probably even lower.''
Moreover, given that H. forbesii is a long-lived (more than 100 years)
tree (Markovchick-Nicholls 2007, p. 4), with some individual trees on
Guatay Mountain estimated to exceed 150 years in age (Dunn 1986, p.
369), the need for reproduction in the absence of fire is low.
Hesperocyparis forbesii biology, status, and management needs were
recently discussed at a workshop on June 16, 2010 (Burrascano 2010, pp.
1-4). Some attendees indicated that the H. forbesii stands on Otay
Mountain are declining over the long term and that increased fire
frequency poses a threat to the tree (Burrascano 2010, pp. 1-4);
however, this assumes a significant correlation between the increased
fire frequency in southern California and a decrease in the burn return
interval within any given occupied cypress stand. Regarding the
likelihood of extirpation, Zedler (2010b, p. 2) stated that ``it is
very unlikely this species will be [extirpated] in 100 years, almost
zero chance in 50.'' Specifically, Zedler (2010b, p. 1) believes the
statistical probability of H. forbesii being extirpated from Otay
Mountain (assuming relative independence of stands) is very low or
insignificant. Zedler (2010b, p. 1) also concluded that as the number
of fires in any area of ground per time increases, the average area
burned in any given fire decreases; hence, to extirpate H. forbesii
completely would require almost a saturation of ignitions, which is
also unlikely. This information supports the unlikely extirpation of H.
forbesii in the foreseeable future.
Regarding the likelihood of decline, Markovchick-Nicholls (2007, p.
v) used available data and stochastic matrix population models to
assess the current risk of decline of Hesperocyparis forbesii under a
range of southern California fire regime scenarios, and to rank
management options and research priorities. Her model results suggest
that H. forbesii will decline under most fire regime scenarios over the
long term, but that this trend may be difficult to detect in the short
term (Markovchick-Nicholls 2007, p. 41). Model results indicated that
fire breaks could be highly effective for H. forbesii conservation, if
designed to minimize removal of H. forbesii (Markovchick-Nicholls 2007,
p. 41). In contrast, collection of seed in older H. forbesii stands for
distribution in reproductively immature stands poses much less risk to
the species, but also has much less dramatic effects on the persistence
of the species than fire breaks do, even if successful (Markovchick-
Nicholls 2007, p. 41). Current BLM policy (BLM 2010a, pp. 6-7) dictates
any future firebreak and road construction projects in Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly habitat on Otay Mountain minimize impacts to the
butterfly (see also Factor D discussion below), while reducing the
threat of fire to the subspecies and its host plant by slowing the
spread of fire once ignited.
To address the issue of fire and how it relates to Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly habitat loss, we conducted several GIS-based
analyses of past fire frequencies and burn patterns on Otay Mountain.
As described in the 90-day finding (71 FR 44980; August 8, 2006), we
used GIS data in our files to overlay Hesperocyparis forbesii
distribution on the map provided in the petition illustrating multiple
fires that have burned through and near Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
locations over the past century, and determined the majority of H.
forbesii was within one or two fire perimeters during the 93-year
period from 1910 to 2003. Furthermore, as discussed above, the areas of
overlap between the 2003 and 2007 fire perimeters were relegated to
lower elevation areas where host plant density is lowest. This result
corresponds with the most conservative fire regime scenario in the
Markovchick-Nicholls models discussed above (46 years), which is the
scenario where the population appeared the most stable (Markovchick-
Nicholls 2007, p. 41). The above information further supports the
unlikely decline or extirpation of H. forbesii in the foreseeable
future.
Using the most recent estimate (based on 2010 data) of 7,549 ac
(3,055 ha) (CNDDB GIS Database 2010) of cypress forest on Otay
Mountain, we calculated the overlap for the three largest fires in the
last 15 years (1996, 2003, and 2007).
[[Page 9997]]
In 1996, 55 percent of cypress forest was within a mapped fire
perimeter. In 2003, 100 percent of the cypress forest was within the
mapped fire perimeter. In 2007, 17 percent of cypress forest was within
the mapped fire perimeter. One hundred percent of the cypress forest
within the 1996 fire perimeter was also within the 2003 fire perimeter,
whereas only 17 percent of the area within the 2003 perimeter was also
within the 2007 fire perimeter. Over the last 15 years, only 9 percent
of cypress forest was within all three fire perimeters, and one
approximately 97-ac (39-ha) stand near the peak within the mapped 2003
fire perimeter is estimated to have not burned in approximately 40
years (Allison 2011, p. 1). The 2007 Harris Fire perimeter encompassed
the lower north and east slopes of Otay Mountain, overlapping with the
2003 burn perimeter primarily around the base of the mountain,
indicating the pattern observed by Dunn (1984, p. 90) has not changed
significantly over the past 27 years (1983-2010). In 1986, Dunn (p.
374) concluded most of the cypress on Otay Mountain were reaching full
maturity and a fire would result in little damage to the population,
because it would in fact result in maximum seed dispersal and
recruitment.
Despite multiple fires over the last four decades on and around
Otay Mountain (see Table 1), our analysis confirms Dunn's conclusion
that fire does not have a significant impact on the cypress forest on
Otay Mountain (Dunn 1986, p. 374). A recent survey documented that not
all Hesperocyparis forbesii individuals within mapped fire perimeters
are burned (Anderson 2010, p. 1). Only 11 of 122 Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly observation locations recorded in 2010 by Lucas (unpublished
data 2010) and only 17 percent of the associated cypress forest fell
within both the 2003 and 2007 mapped fire perimeters (Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office GIS database). Throughout the areas that burned again
in 2007, cypress regrowth and Thorne's hairstreak butterflies were
observed in 2010. Furthermore, recent border fence construction and
other enforcement activities in the Otay Mountain Wilderness area have
reduced foot traffic by illegal immigrants from Mexico (Ford 2010, p.
1), reducing the likelihood of fire ignition resulting from this
source.
As described above, Santa Ana winds and human-caused ignitions are
important factors in southern California's shrubland and forest fire
regimes. Because the Santa Ana wind events in fall and winter are
driven by large-scale patterns of atmospheric circulation, researchers
have developed projections for Santa Ana Occurrence (SAO) using global
climate models (GCM) (Miller and Schlegel, 2006, p. 1). Results
obtained from one GCM do not show an increase in the total number of
annual SAOs; however, they did find a temporal shift in SAOs, with a
decrease during the months of September and October and an increase in
December (Miller and Schlegel, 2006, p. 3). The effects of this shift,
coupled with predicted decreased precipitation (see Climate Change
section in Factor E discussion below) to fire regime are unclear;
however, December and January are typically the wettest months on
record in Southern California (National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration 2005). This temporal shift of SAOs from a time following
the driest period of the year (May to October) to after the fall and
winter rains begin (Scripps Institute of Oceanography 2010) would
likely reduce the potential for and impact of wind and human-caused
ignitions in southern California.
The output from climate change models predicts a 50-percent
contraction in mixed evergreen woodland and shrubland vegetation
(general vegetation types that may include Hesperocyparis forbesii
stands) in California for the time period from 2070 to 2099 (Lenihan et
al. 2003, p. 1674) (for recent information on future climate
predictions, see Factor E discussion). Lenihan et al. (2003, p. 1674)
found that the most prominent feature of the vegetation class's
response to the drier model scenario was the advancement of grassland
into the historical range of mixed evergreen woodland and shrubland.
Such vegetation changes could reduce host plant and nectar source
availability for Thorne's hairstreak butterfly, as woody vegetation
declines and grasses replace native flowering forbs. Based on the above
discussion, nectar source availability may be a determining factor in
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly occupancy; however, the general climate
change vegetation effect models (Lenihan et al. 2003, p. 1674) found
the simulated response to changes in precipitation were complex,
involving changes in tree-grass competition mediated by fire.
We are unable to predict the changes in climate, especially on a
localized, small scale such as Otay Mountain, as well as what the
impacts to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and its habitat may be because
this area is small relative to the resolution of vegetation change
prediction models (which used climate models of intermediate scale to
predict vegetation responses) and contains a relatively unique
community dominated by the rare endemic cypress (see also Factor E
discussion). While uncertainty exists regarding the potential effects
of climate change on wildfire and habitat loss, and despite the
increasing frequency of fires in southern California, the best
available information does not indicate the average burn return
interval per given area of cypress forest is decreasing, and it does
indicate ignition sources on Otay Mountain have been reduced compared
to historical levels; therefore, wildfire has not been, and is not
likely to be, a significant threat to the Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
or its habitat now or in the foreseeable future.
Habitat Fragmentation
We examined the possibility of habitat fragmentation affecting
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly. The connectivity of habitat occupied by
a butterfly population is not defined by host plant distribution at the
scale of host plant stands or patches, but rather by adult butterfly
movement that results in interbreeding (see Service 2003a, pp. 22, 162-
165). Any loss of resource contiguity on the ground that does not
affect butterfly movement, such as burned vegetation or road
construction through stands of cypress, may degrade habitat but does
not fragment a population. Therefore, in order for butterfly habitat to
be considered fragmented, movement must be prevented by a barrier, or
the distance between remaining host plants where larvae develop must be
greater than adult butterflies will move to mate or deposit eggs. If it
occurred, habitat fragmentation might create smaller, more vulnerable
populations (see Factor E discussion below); however, the best
available information indicates that habitat fragmentation has not
occurred on Otay Mountain (see Distribution and Population Status
section above). Hesperocyparis forbesii has demonstrated an ability to
recolonize after fire events on Otay Mountain, and data obtained since
publication of the 2010 90-day finding (75 FR 17062) indicate Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly is able disperse through wind events between any
temporarily isolated patches of H. forbesii (see Distribution and
Population Status section above). Therefore, we have determined that
habitat fragmentation is not a threat to the subspecies now, nor is it
likely to become so in the foreseeable future.
Road and Firebreak Construction
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat is relatively protected from
most sources of habitat destruction, modification, or
[[Page 9998]]
curtailment because approximately 99 percent of its potential habitat
(mapped Interior Cypress Forest vegetation; CNDDB GIS database 2007) is
within publicly owned areas that are conserved and managed, primarily
within the BLM Otay Mountain Wilderness and San Diego Multiple Species
Conservation Program (MSCP) subarea plan preserves (see Habitat
Conservation Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community Conservation Plans
(NCCPs) section and Factor D discussion below).
Although road and firebreak construction has occurred in the past
in stands of Hesperocyparis forbesii where Thorne's hairstreak
butterflies have been observed, these impacts have been relatively
limited based on our qualitative comparison of Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly and host plant locations with Google Earth satellite imagery
of roads and firebreaks. Because U.S. Customs and Border Protection
recently completed construction of the border fence and expanded the
associated ``pack trail'' into a wider ``truck trail'' to accommodate
vehicles, the need for further significant Border Patrol-related
construction activities is not anticipated (Ford 2010, p. 1). Any
future firebreak and road construction projects that do occur in
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat on Otay Mountain will be planned
so as to minimize impacts to the butterfly (see also Factor D below),
while reducing the threat of fire to the subspecies and its host plant
by slowing the spread of fire once ignited (BLM 2010a, pp. 6-7).
Finally, Williams and Congedo (2008, p. 19) concluded that existing
traffic corridors on Otay Mountain did not appear to be detrimental to
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly unless increasing human traffic
contributes to increasing fire danger.
The status of the Otay Mountain area as predominantly wilderness
area and preserve (which are managed) indicates this area is unlikely
to receive increased legal human traffic. Furthermore, as noted above,
recent border fence construction and other enforcement activities in
the Otay Mountain Wilderness area have reduced illegal human traffic
(Ford 2010, p. 1), thereby reducing the likelihood of fire ignition by
this source. Therefore, road and firebreak construction is not a
significant threat to the subspecies now, nor is it likely to become so
in the foreseeable future.
Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community Conservation
Plans (NCCPs)
Habitat conservation plans (HCPs) and natural community
conservation plans (NCCPs) benefit Thorne's hairstreak butterfly
through conservation, management, and monitoring. Habitat conservation
plans are developed under section 10 of the Act to support issuance of
permits that authorize the limited incidental take of listed species in
return for conservation and management of the species and their
habitats. The NCCP program is a cooperative effort involving the State
of California and numerous private and public partners to protect
regional habitats and species. The primary objective of NCCPs is to
conserve natural communities at the ecosystem scale while accommodating
compatible land uses. NCCPs help identify, and provide for, the
regional or area-wide protection of plants, animals, and their habitats
while allowing compatible and appropriate economic activity. Many NCCPs
are developed in conjunction with HCPs prepared under the Act.
The San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) is a
subregional HCP and NCCP made up of several subarea plans that has been
in place for more than a decade. Under the umbrella of the MSCP, each
of the 12 participating jurisdictions is required to prepare a subarea
plan that implements the goals of the MSCP within that particular
jurisdiction.
Both Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and Hesperocyparis forbesii are
covered species under the County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan,
although neither the butterfly nor H. forbesii are covered species
under the City of Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. The County of San
Diego MSCP Subarea Plan encompasses the majority (859 ac (348 ha)) of
H. forbesii habitat (Interior Cypress Forest; CNDDB GIS database 2007)
outside of the Otay Mountain Wilderness. The remainder of the H.
forbesii habitat outside of the Otay Mountain Wilderness (approximately
60 ac (24 ha)) is privately owned in an Amendment Area for the San
Diego MSCP Planning Area (see discussion below). Within the County of
San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan, over 99 percent of H. forbesii habitat
(Tecate Cypress Forest) is planned for conservation and management
(County of San Diego 2008a, Part 3, Section 2, p. 7), and the majority
has already been acquired for conservation.
As noted above, Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and Hesperocyparis
forbesii are covered species under the subarea plan (Service 1998, p.
6), which requires protection of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly host
plants and local chaparral species used as nectar sources. The
Framework Management Plan for the County of San Diego Subarea Plan
under the MSCP (County of San Diego 2008b, p. 2; Framework Management
Plan) requires the use of specific adaptive management techniques
directed at the conservation and recovery of covered species, such as
actions that assure wildfires do not occur too frequently in areas
where species are sensitive to fire. The Framework Management Plan also
provides for biological monitoring and preparation of an annual report,
and based upon this review and biological monitoring effort,
adjustments in the management goals can be made as necessary (County of
San Diego 2008b, p. 2). Because Thorne's hairstreak butterfly is
required to be conserved and adaptively managed and monitored under the
County of San Diego Subarea Plan, we anticipate land management to
protect Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and its habitat will continue to
be implemented under the County of San Diego Subarea Plan.
Additionally, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on cooperation
in habitat conservation planning and management issued by BLM in 1994,
in conjunction with the development of the County of San Diego Subarea
Plan under the MSCP (BLM 1994, pp. 1-8), also applies to the Otay
Mountain Wilderness because it falls entirely within the boundary of
this subarea plan. As outlined in the MOU (BLM 1994, p. 3), BLM is
committed to managing their lands (i.e., Otay Mountain Wilderness) to
``conform with'' the County of San Diego Subarea Plan, which in turn
requires protection of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly's larval host
plant, Hesperocyparis forbesii, and local chaparral species used as
nectar sources. Therefore, protections provided by the County of San
Diego Subarea Plan under the MSCP to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and
its habitat also apply to the Otay Mountain Wilderness.
The 90-day finding (75 FR 17062; April 5, 2010) states,
``Approximately 48 ac (19 ha) of Hesperocyparis forbesii habitat fall
under the [County of San Diego Subarea Plan], which strives for fire
management and prevention to restore the previous 25-year [burn return
interval]''; however, we have since determined this statement is not
accurate. The statement was based on the 1994 BLM South Coast Resource
Management Plan that specifies a minimum planned 25-year burn return
interval for controlled burns in H. forbesii habitat ``east of the
Minewawa truck trail on the Otay Mountain [Wilderness]'' (BLM 1994, p.
21). The Minewawa Truck Trail runs from the peak at Doghouse Junction,
north to Otay Lakes Road, dividing the northern half of Otay Mountain
into east and
[[Page 9999]]
west quarters. As discussed above, per an MOU, BLM has committed to
manage its lands in a manner that complements the County of San Diego
Subarea Plan; this management commitment was mistakenly attributed to
that HCP in the 90-day finding. The 48-ac (19-ha) estimate was based on
the area of H. forbesii stands mapped by Lucas (Forister and Lucas
2009, pp. 1-2) and located outside the Otay Mountain Wilderness.
Therefore, the 48-ac (19-ha) area estimate is not accurate with regard
to the amount of H. forbesii habitat (see Distribution and Population
Status section above) that is managed by the County of San Diego. Our
estimate of the habitat managed by the County of San Diego under their
subarea plan is 859 ac (348 ha) (see discussion above). Finally, BLM
does not have any plans to conduct controlled burns (see Factor D
discussion below) nor is it committed to maintain a 25-year burn return
interval for such burns (BLM 1994, p. 21), and the County of San Diego
Subarea Plan includes the assurance that wildfires will not occur too
frequently in areas where species are sensitive to fire. The BLM draft
revised South Coast Resource Management Plan specifically includes a
goal of restoring burn return interval to 50 years through fire
prevention or suppression and prescribed burns (see Factor D discussion
below). Current BLM prescribed burn practices preclude burning of any
H. forbesii habitat that would not enhance cypress stand viability or
that would negatively affect Thorne's hairstreak butterfly (see Factor
D discussion below). Therefore, the misrepresented regulatory 25-year
burn return interval issue is not a valid concern with regard to
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly conservation.
The City of Chula Vista Subarea Plan under the MSCP includes a
preserve that encompasses the newly discovered Otay River Valley
occupied site (see Distribution and Population Status section above).
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and Hesperocyparis forbesii are not
covered species under this subarea plan. However, all lands preserved
under the Chula Vista Subarea Plan are adaptively managed and
maintained to:
(1) Ensure the long-term viability and sustainability of native
ecosystem function and natural processes throughout the Preserve;
(2) Protect existing and restored biological resources from the
impacts of human activities within the Preserve while accommodating
compatible uses;
(3) Enhance and restore, where feasible, appropriate native plant
associations and wildlife connections to adjoining habitat to provide
viable wildlife and sensitive species habitat;
(4) Facilitate monitoring of selected target species, habitats, and
linkages to ensure long-term persistence of viable populations of
priority plant and animal species; and
(5) Ensure functional habitats and linkages for those species
(Service 2003b, pp.18, 70, FWS-SDG-882.1).
We believe these management prescriptions adequately protect
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and its habitat within the preserve, and
the adaptive management measures of the Chula Vista Subarea Plan allow
for adjustment of preserve management, as appropriate, to conserve this
newly discovered population of Thorne's hairstreak butterfly.
One relatively small area of occupied cypress forest (approximately
60 ac (24 ha) composed of four butterfly observation locations) in the
southwest foothills of Otay Mountain east of Otay Mesa is privately
owned and not within an approved subarea plan, but falls within the
MSCP planning area where a new subarea plan is being developed (i.e., a
County of San Diego MSCP ``Amendment Area'') (CNDDB GIS Database 2010).
While these habitats are not currently protected from threats to
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat by conservation or management,
the majority of this area is also occupied by the endangered Quino
checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino), and Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly habitat is therefore already afforded some
indirect protection under section 9 of the Act.
Summary of Factor A
We evaluated several factors with the potential to destroy, modify,
or curtail Thorne's hairstreak butterfly's habitat or range, including
decreasing burn return intervals, climate change related to wildfire,
habitat fragmentation, and road and firebreak construction. We also
evaluated the benefits to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly and its habitat
associated with HCPs and NCCPs. Wildfire can negatively affect the
species' habitat and in particular its host plant. However, our
analysis does not indicate wildfire events have deviated from
historical fire frequency or burn return interval patterns. Despite two
recent large fires (2003 and 2007), Thorne's hairstreak butterfly has
not only survived or recolonized habitats within mapped recent fire
perimeters, it has expanded its range. In addition, while uncertainty
exists regarding the potential effects of climate change on wildfire
and habitat loss, the best available information regarding decreased
burn return interval indicates the indirect effects of climate change
on Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat are not threats to the
subspecies now, nor are they predicted for the future. We have also
determined the best available information indicates habitat
fragmentation does not occur within the range of Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly. We further determined that impacts to Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly habitat resulting from road and firebreak construction have
been relatively limited and are not anticipated to increase in the
future. Additionally, approximately 99 percent of all potential
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat (cypress woodland within existing
County of San Diego Subarea Plan preserves, the City of Chula Vista
Subarea Plan preserve, and Otay Mountain Wilderness Area) is conserved
and managed to benefit both the species and its host plant. Therefore,
we believe existing HCPs and NCCPs provide protection for Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly habitat. Based on our review of the best available
scientific and commercial information, we conclude that Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly is not threatened by the present or threatened
destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range now
or in the foreseeable future.
Factor B. Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
We have no information to indicate that overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes is
currently a threat to the Thorne's hairstreak butterfly, nor do we
anticipate that it will become a threat in the future. Therefore, based
on our review of the best available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that Thorne's hairstreak butterfly is not
threatened by overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific,
or educational purposes now or in the foreseeable future.
Factor C. Disease or Predation
Disease
Our review of the best available scientific and commercial data
found nothing to indicate that disease is a threat to Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly now or in the foreseeable future.
Predation
Predation (including parasitism) is a factor that is known to cause
mortality in butterflies, and therefore could potentially threaten any
butterfly
[[Page 10000]]
species. Faulkner and Klein (2005, p. 34) stated that birds may consume
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly larvae, although we are not aware of any
data that indicate bird predation is a significant threat to Thorne's
hairstreak butterflies. Brachonid wasps (parasitoid insects that
deposit eggs in their host and kill it when offspring emerge as adults)
have been observed near the host plant, but there has been no
documentation of predation on Thorne's hairstreak butterflies (Faulkner
and Klein 2005, p. 34; Klein 2010a p, 5). One potential larval predator
observed during the 2007 season in large numbers at one occupied site
is the nonnative seven-spotted ladybird beetle (Coccinella
septempuctata) (Klein 2010a, pp. 5, 12); however, we are not aware of
any data indicating the beetles have negative effects on Thorne's
hairstreak butterfly.
Heavy predation and parasitism of adult insects and their progeny
is a common ecological phenomenon, and most species have evolved under
conditions where high mortality due to natural enemies has shaped their
evolution (see Schmid-Hempel 1995, p. 255; Ehrlich et al. 1998). Our
review did not reveal any specific information regarding predation of
Thorne's hairstreak butterflies, nor do we have any indication that
predation will become a threat in the foreseeable future. Therefore,
based on our review of the best available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude Thorne's hairstreak butterfly is not
threatened by predation either now or in the foreseeable future.
Factor D. The Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms
The Act requires us to examine the adequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms with respect to threats that may place Thorne's hairstreak
butterfly in danger of extinction or likely to become so in the future.
Existing regulatory mechanisms that may have an effect on potential
threats to Thorne's hairstreak butterfly can be placed into two general
categories: (1) Federal mechanisms, and (2) State mechanisms.
Federal Mechanisms
The Otay Mountain Wilderness Act (1999) (Pub. L. 106-145) and BLM
management policies provide protection for the majority of occupied
Thorne's hairstreak butterfly habitat (over 90 percent of all recorded
butterfly observation locations). The Otay Mountain Wilderness Act
directs that the Otay Mountain designated wilderness area (i.e., Otay
Mountain Wilderness; 18,500 ac (7,486 ha)) be managed in accordance
with the provisions of the Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131 et
seq.). The Wilderness Act of 1964 strictly limits use of wilderness
areas, imposing restrictions on vehicle use, new developments,
chainsaws, mountain bikes, leasing, and mining, in order to protect the
natural habitats of the areas, maintain species diversity, and