Airworthiness Directives; BURKHART GROB LUFT-UND Model G 103 C Twin III SL Gliders, 9513-9515 [2011-3660]
Download as PDF
9513
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 34
Friday, February 18, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0127; Directorate
Identifier 2010–CE–065–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BURKHART
GROB LUFT-UND Model G 103 C Twin
III SL Gliders
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact GROB
Aircraft AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, 86874
Tussenhausen-Mattsies, Germany;
telephone: +49 (0) 8268–998–0; fax: +49
(0) 8268–998–200; e-mail
productsupport@grob-aircraft.com;
Internet: https://www.grob-aircraft.eu.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 816–329–
4148.
Examining the AD Docket
The in-flight loss of a propeller and pulley
wheel from the engine of a Grob G 103 C
Twin III SL powered sailplane has been
reported.
Grob Aircraft AG suspects that the possible
reasons for this loss can be due to an
incorrect propeller track (the play at the
propeller tip) and/or to a damaged propeller
nut securing plate.
Those conditions, if not corrected, could
also result in loosening of parts and,
consequently could result in damage to the
sailplane and possible injury to persons on
the ground.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4165; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:15 Feb 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0127; Directorate Identifier
2010–CE–065–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
2010–0107, dated June 11, 2010
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The in-flight loss of a propeller and pulley
wheel from the engine of a Grob G 103 C
Twin III SL powered sailplane has been
reported.
Grob Aircraft AG suspects that the possible
reasons for this loss can be due to an
incorrect propeller track (the play at the
propeller tip) and/or to a damaged propeller
nut securing plate.
Those conditions, if not corrected, could
also result in loosening of parts and,
consequently could result in damage to the
sailplane and possible injury to persons on
the ground.
For the reasons stated above, this AD
requires to inspect the propeller assembly
attachment, to verify that the propeller track
is within the allowable tolerances and,
depending on findings, to accomplish the
relevant corrective actions.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Burkhart Grob Luft-Und has issued
the following documents. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI:
• Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin No.
MSB–869–24/1, dated July 20, 2009;
• Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL–
869–01, dated June 9, 2009;
• G 103 C Twin III SL Pilot’s
Operating Handbook (POH) (dated
December 1991), pages 0.2A, 0.3, 0.4,
and 4.9, Revision 6, dated July 20, 2009;
• G 103 C Twin III SL Maintenance
Manual (dated December 1991), page
6.12, Revision 9, dated May 24, 2002;
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
9514
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
and pages 0.1A, 0.2, 0.3, 4.2, and 6.6,
Revision 10, dated December 15, 2006.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 4 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $680, or $170 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 6 work-hours and require parts
costing $100, for a cost of $610 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:15 Feb 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
BURKHART GROB LUFT-UND: Docket No.
FAA–2011–0127; Directorate Identifier
2010–CE–065–AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by April 4,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to BURKHART GROB
LUFT-UND G 103 C Twin III SL gliders, all
serial numbers, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 61: Propellers/Propulsors.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
The in-flight loss of a propeller and pulley
wheel from the engine of a Grob G 103 C
Twin III SL powered sailplane has been
reported.
Grob Aircraft AG suspects that the possible
reasons for this loss can be due to an
incorrect propeller track (the play at the
propeller tip) and/or to a damaged propeller
nut securing plate.
Those conditions, if not corrected, could
also result in loosening of parts and,
consequently could result in damage to the
sailplane and possible injury to persons on
the ground.
For the reasons stated above, this AD
requires to inspect the propeller assembly
attachment, to verify that the propeller track
is within the allowable tolerances and,
depending on findings, to accomplish the
relevant corrective actions.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, do the
following actions:
(1) Update the glider documentation
following Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin No.
MSB–869–24/1, dated July 20, 2009, by
inserting the following pages:
(i) Into the G 103 C Twin III SL Pilot’s
Operating Handbook (POH) (dated December
1991): pages 0.2A, 0.3, 0.4, and 4.9, Revision
6, dated July 20, 2009.
(ii) Into the G 103 C Twin III SL
Maintenance Manual (dated December, 1991)
or FAA-approved maintenance program:
pages 0.1A, 0.2, 0.3, 4.2, and 6.6, Revision 10,
dated December 15, 2006.
(2) Inspect for cracks at the bent area of the
engaged tooth of the upper pulley wheel
securing plate following the procedure to
access the area found on page 6.12 of the G
103 C TWIN III SL Maintenance Manual,
Date of Issue December, 1991, Revision 9,
dated May 24, 2002, as specified in Grob
Aircraft Service Letter SL 869–01, dated June
9, 2009.
(3) Verify that the propeller track (the play
at the propeller tip) is within the allowable
tolerances following the procedure on page
4.9 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL POH, Date
of Issue December, 1991, Revision 6, dated
July 20, 2009, as specified in Grob Aircraft
Service Letter SL 869–01, dated June 9, 2009.
Note 1: The torque values and tolerances
of the upper pulley wheel grooved nut have
been standardized in the POH and
maintenance manual.
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(4) If the bent area of the engaged tooth of
the upper pulley wheel securing plate has no
crack found per the inspection of paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD, but the propeller track value
measured is not within the allowable
tolerances per paragraph (f)(3) of this AD,
before further flight, readjust the torque of
the upper pulley wheel grooved nut using the
updated aircraft technical documentation
following the procedure on page 6.12 of the
G 103 C TWIN III SL Maintenance Manual,
Date of Issue December, 1991, Revision 9,
dated May 24, 2002, as specified in Grob
Aircraft Service Letter SL 869–01, dated June
9, 2009. Ensure accordingly that the propeller
track is within the allowable tolerances
following the procedure on page 4.9 of the G
103 C TWIN III SL POH, Date of Issue
December, 1991, Revision 6, dated July 20,
2009, as specified in Grob Aircraft Service
Letter SL 869–01, dated June 9, 2009. If the
propeller track is out of the allowable
tolerance, then contact GROB for further
instructions.
(5) If any crack is found in the bent area
of the engaged tooth of the upper pulley
wheel securing plate per the inspection in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, before further
flight, do the following actions:
(i) Remove the upper pulley wheel grooved
nut and then look at the securing plate to
identify if other teeth are available to be bent
to secure the grooved nut. Do not bend an
already bent tooth. If all teeth of the securing
plate are already bent, replace the securing
plate with a serviceable one.
(ii) Screw back the upper pulley wheel
grooved nut (and its securing plate) and
tighten it, applying the torque following page
6.12 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL Maintenance
Manual, Date of Issue December, 1991,
Revision 9, dated May 24, 2002, as specified
in Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL 869–01,
dated June 9, 2009. Ensure accordingly that
the propeller track is within the allowable
tolerances following the procedure on page
4.9 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL POH, Date
of Issue December, 1991, Revision 6, dated
July 20, 2009, as specified in Grob Aircraft
Service Letter SL 869–01, dated June 9, 2009.
If the propeller track is out of the allowable
tolerances, then contact GROB for further
instructions.
FAA AD Differences
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4165; fax: (816) 329–
4090. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:15 Feb 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, a Federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
Related Information
(h) Refer to the following documents for
related information:
(1) MCAI EASA AD No.: 2010–0107, dated
June 11, 2010;
(2) Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin MSB
869–24/1, dated July 20, 2009;
(3) Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL–869–01,
dated June 9, 2009;
(4) G 103 C Twin III SL Pilot’s Operating
Handbook (POH) (dated December 1991),
pages 0.2A, 0.3, 0.4, and 4.9, Revision 6,
dated July 20, 2009; and
(5) G 103 C Twin III SL Maintenance
Manual (dated December 1991), page 6.12,
Revision 9, dated May 24, 2002; and pages
0.1A, 0.2, 0.3, 4.2, and 6.6, Revision 10, dated
December 15, 2006.
(i) For service information related to this
AD, contact GROB Aircraft AG,
Lettenbachstrasse 9, 86874 TussenhausenMattsies, Germany; telephone: +49 (0) 8268–
998–0; fax: +49 (0) 8268–998–200; e-mail
productsupport@grob-aircraft.com; Internet:
https://www.grob-aircraft.eu. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 816–329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
February 11, 2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–3660 Filed 2–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9515
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0115; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NE–40–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca
S.A. ARRIEL 2B and 2B1 Turboshaft
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
Several cases of Gas Generator (GG)
Turbine Blade rupture occurred in service on
ARRIEL 2 twin engine applications and
recently one on a single engine helicopter.
For the case occurring in flight on a single
engine helicopter (ARRIEL 2B1 engine), the
pilot performed an emergency autorotation,
landing the helicopter without further
incident.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
rupture of a GG turbine blade, which
could result in an uncommanded inflight shutdown and an emergency
autorotation landing or accident.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220
Tarnos, France; e-mail:
noria-dallas@turbomeca.com;
telephone 33 05 59 74 40 00, fax 33 05
59 74 45 15, or go to: https://
www.turbomeca-support.com for the
service information identified in this
proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9513-9515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3660]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 9513]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0127; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-065-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BURKHART GROB LUFT-UND Model G 103 C
Twin III SL Gliders
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The in-flight loss of a propeller and pulley wheel from the
engine of a Grob G 103 C Twin III SL powered sailplane has been
reported.
Grob Aircraft AG suspects that the possible reasons for this
loss can be due to an incorrect propeller track (the play at the
propeller tip) and/or to a damaged propeller nut securing plate.
Those conditions, if not corrected, could also result in
loosening of parts and, consequently could result in damage to the
sailplane and possible injury to persons on the ground.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
GROB Aircraft AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, 86874 Tussenhausen-Mattsies,
Germany; telephone: +49 (0) 8268-998-0; fax: +49 (0) 8268-998-200; e-
mail aircraft.com">productsupport@grob-aircraft.com; Internet: https://www.grob-aircraft.eu. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 816-329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4165; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0127;
Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-065-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2010-0107, dated June 11, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
The in-flight loss of a propeller and pulley wheel from the
engine of a Grob G 103 C Twin III SL powered sailplane has been
reported.
Grob Aircraft AG suspects that the possible reasons for this
loss can be due to an incorrect propeller track (the play at the
propeller tip) and/or to a damaged propeller nut securing plate.
Those conditions, if not corrected, could also result in
loosening of parts and, consequently could result in damage to the
sailplane and possible injury to persons on the ground.
For the reasons stated above, this AD requires to inspect the
propeller assembly attachment, to verify that the propeller track is
within the allowable tolerances and, depending on findings, to
accomplish the relevant corrective actions.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Burkhart Grob Luft-Und has issued the following documents. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI:
Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin No. MSB-869-24/1, dated
July 20, 2009;
Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL-869-01, dated June 9,
2009;
G 103 C Twin III SL Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH)
(dated December 1991), pages 0.2A, 0.3, 0.4, and 4.9, Revision 6, dated
July 20, 2009;
G 103 C Twin III SL Maintenance Manual (dated December
1991), page 6.12, Revision 9, dated May 24, 2002;
[[Page 9514]]
and pages 0.1A, 0.2, 0.3, 4.2, and 6.6, Revision 10, dated December 15,
2006.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 4 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $680, or $170 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 6 work-hours and require parts costing $100, for a cost of
$610 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
BURKHART GROB LUFT-UND: Docket No. FAA-2011-0127; Directorate
Identifier 2010-CE-065-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by April 4, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to BURKHART GROB LUFT-UND G 103 C Twin III
SL gliders, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 61:
Propellers/Propulsors.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The in-flight loss of a propeller and pulley wheel from the
engine of a Grob G 103 C Twin III SL powered sailplane has been
reported.
Grob Aircraft AG suspects that the possible reasons for this
loss can be due to an incorrect propeller track (the play at the
propeller tip) and/or to a damaged propeller nut securing plate.
Those conditions, if not corrected, could also result in
loosening of parts and, consequently could result in damage to the
sailplane and possible injury to persons on the ground.
For the reasons stated above, this AD requires to inspect the
propeller assembly attachment, to verify that the propeller track is
within the allowable tolerances and, depending on findings, to
accomplish the relevant corrective actions.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, do the following actions:
(1) Update the glider documentation following Grob Aircraft
Service Bulletin No. MSB-869-24/1, dated July 20, 2009, by inserting
the following pages:
(i) Into the G 103 C Twin III SL Pilot's Operating Handbook
(POH) (dated December 1991): pages 0.2A, 0.3, 0.4, and 4.9, Revision
6, dated July 20, 2009.
(ii) Into the G 103 C Twin III SL Maintenance Manual (dated
December, 1991) or FAA-approved maintenance program: pages 0.1A,
0.2, 0.3, 4.2, and 6.6, Revision 10, dated December 15, 2006.
(2) Inspect for cracks at the bent area of the engaged tooth of
the upper pulley wheel securing plate following the procedure to
access the area found on page 6.12 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL
Maintenance Manual, Date of Issue December, 1991, Revision 9, dated
May 24, 2002, as specified in Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL 869-
01, dated June 9, 2009.
(3) Verify that the propeller track (the play at the propeller
tip) is within the allowable tolerances following the procedure on
page 4.9 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL POH, Date of Issue December,
1991, Revision 6, dated July 20, 2009, as specified in Grob Aircraft
Service Letter SL 869-01, dated June 9, 2009.
Note 1: The torque values and tolerances of the upper pulley
wheel grooved nut have been standardized in the POH and maintenance
manual.
[[Page 9515]]
(4) If the bent area of the engaged tooth of the upper pulley
wheel securing plate has no crack found per the inspection of
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, but the propeller track value measured
is not within the allowable tolerances per paragraph (f)(3) of this
AD, before further flight, readjust the torque of the upper pulley
wheel grooved nut using the updated aircraft technical documentation
following the procedure on page 6.12 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL
Maintenance Manual, Date of Issue December, 1991, Revision 9, dated
May 24, 2002, as specified in Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL 869-
01, dated June 9, 2009. Ensure accordingly that the propeller track
is within the allowable tolerances following the procedure on page
4.9 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL POH, Date of Issue December, 1991,
Revision 6, dated July 20, 2009, as specified in Grob Aircraft
Service Letter SL 869-01, dated June 9, 2009. If the propeller track
is out of the allowable tolerance, then contact GROB for further
instructions.
(5) If any crack is found in the bent area of the engaged tooth
of the upper pulley wheel securing plate per the inspection in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, do the following
actions:
(i) Remove the upper pulley wheel grooved nut and then look at
the securing plate to identify if other teeth are available to be
bent to secure the grooved nut. Do not bend an already bent tooth.
If all teeth of the securing plate are already bent, replace the
securing plate with a serviceable one.
(ii) Screw back the upper pulley wheel grooved nut (and its
securing plate) and tighten it, applying the torque following page
6.12 of the G 103 C TWIN III SL Maintenance Manual, Date of Issue
December, 1991, Revision 9, dated May 24, 2002, as specified in Grob
Aircraft Service Letter SL 869-01, dated June 9, 2009. Ensure
accordingly that the propeller track is within the allowable
tolerances following the procedure on page 4.9 of the G 103 C TWIN
III SL POH, Date of Issue December, 1991, Revision 6, dated July 20,
2009, as specified in Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL 869-01, dated
June 9, 2009. If the propeller track is out of the allowable
tolerances, then contact GROB for further instructions.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4165; fax: (816) 329-4090. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Related Information
(h) Refer to the following documents for related information:
(1) MCAI EASA AD No.: 2010-0107, dated June 11, 2010;
(2) Grob Aircraft Service Bulletin MSB 869-24/1, dated July 20,
2009;
(3) Grob Aircraft Service Letter SL-869-01, dated June 9, 2009;
(4) G 103 C Twin III SL Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) (dated
December 1991), pages 0.2A, 0.3, 0.4, and 4.9, Revision 6, dated
July 20, 2009; and
(5) G 103 C Twin III SL Maintenance Manual (dated December
1991), page 6.12, Revision 9, dated May 24, 2002; and pages 0.1A,
0.2, 0.3, 4.2, and 6.6, Revision 10, dated December 15, 2006.
(i) For service information related to this AD, contact GROB
Aircraft AG, Lettenbachstrasse 9, 86874 Tussenhausen-Mattsies,
Germany; telephone: +49 (0) 8268-998-0; fax: +49 (0) 8268-998-200;
e-mail aircraft.com">productsupport@grob-aircraft.com; Internet: https://www.grob-aircraft.eu. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 816-329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 11, 2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-3660 Filed 2-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P