Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Clark County, WA; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment, 9047-9049 [2011-3540]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
the public interest, which includes but
is not limited to consideration of
potential impacts on affected local
communities and Tribes. The
determination will be based on a
number of factors, including an
economic analysis. One part of the
economic analysis is a non-use
valuation survey that is designed to
determine the potential benefits of dam
removal that may accrue to members of
the U.S. public who value such
improvements regardless of whether
they consume Klamath Basin fish or
visit the Klamath Basin. Non-use
valuation surveys, such as the one
discussed herein, are routinely included
as a part of the economic analysis for
large-scale water development projects.
II. Data
Title: Klamath Non-Use Valuation
Survey.
OMB Control Number: 1090–0010.
Type of Review: Revision of an
approved collection.
Affected Entities: Households.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Frequency of Response: One time.
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 10,400 households who
will receive the survey (3200
respondents and 7,200 nonrespondents).
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
3200.
Estimated Time per Response: The
base for this survey is 10,400
households. The households will be
divided into two mailing groups, at a
10/90 split. The first wave of mailings
will be to 10% of the households. Each
household will receive a prenotification
postcard notification, which will take 30
seconds to read, followed by the first
mailing of the survey. 17% of
households are estimated to respond,
which will take 30 minutes. Nonrespondents will take 3 minutes. The
second mailing will be sent to the
remaining 83% of non-respondent
households. 10% of the households are
estimated to respond to the second
mailing, taking 30 minutes. The second
group of non-respondents are estimated
to spend 3 minutes. The Department
will then conduct preliminary analysis.
The second wave of mailings will be
to the remaining 90% of the households.
Each household will receive a
prenotification postcard notification,
which will take 30 seconds to read,
followed by the first mailing of the
survey. 17% of households are
estimated to respond, which will take
30 minutes. Non-respondents will take
3 minutes. The second phase will be
sent to the remaining 83% of nonrespondent households. 10% of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
households are estimated to respond to
the second mailing, taking 30 minutes.
The second group of non-respondents
are estimated to spend 3 minutes.
The second group of non-respondents
will be sent a reminder letter, taking 30
seconds. The letter will provide the web
address of the survey and a toll-free
number and email for the respondent to
call or write to get another copy of the
survey. 5% of the households are
estimated to complete the survey, taking
30 minutes.
After the reminder mailing, 20% of
the nonrespondents will be sent a letter
by Federal Express or Priority Mail with
a letter and a much shorter version of
the survey, taking approximately 30
seconds to read. It is assumed that 65%
of the non-respondent households will
have a phone number. For respondents
with telephone numbers, the letter and
survey will be followed by a phone call
from a live operator who will either talk
to the household or leave a message
reiterating the higher incentive and
offering to mail another copy of the
survey if the household needs one. DOI
expects that 20% of nonrespondents
will complete the shorter survey after
the phone call reminder, taking 10
minutes. The phone call without the
completing the shorter survey is
estimated to take 5 minutes. For the
35% of households without telephone
numbers, DOI expects that 10% of
nonrespondents will complete the
survey after receiving the Federal
Express letter. DOI estimates that 10%
of nonrespondants will spend 5 minutes
on the shorter survey and letter. DOI
estimates 90% nonrespondents will
spend 3 minutes on the survey and
letter.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,571 hours.
III. Request for Comments
On August 30, 2010, we published in
the Federal Register a request for public
comments on this proposed survey.
Revisions were subsequently made to
the survey in response to comments that
were received. This notice provides the
public with an additional opportunity to
comment on the revised survey. The
Department of the Interior invites
comments on:
(1) Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
and the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9047
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
control number.
Dated: February 11, 2011.
Benjamin M. Simon,
Economics Staff Director, Office of Policy
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2011–3506 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2010–N220; 1265–0000–10137–
S3]
Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge,
Clark County, WA; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Environmental Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for the
environmental assessment (EA) for the
Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge
(Refuge). In this final CCP, we describe
how we will manage this Refuge for the
next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the final CCP and FONSI by
any of the following methods. You may
request a hard copy or CD–ROM.
Agency Web Site: Download the CCP/
FONSI at https://www.fws.gov/pacific/
planning.
E-mail:
FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Ridgefield Refuge final CCP’’ in
the subject line of the message.
Mail: Ridgefield National Wildlife
Refuge, P.O. Box 457, Ridgefield, WA
98642.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
9048
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices
CCP Alternatives, Including Selected
Alternative
Introduction
With this notice, we complete the
CCP process for the Refuge. The Service
started this process through a notice of
intent in the Federal Register (71 FR
43787; August 2, 2006). We released the
Draft CCP/EA to the public, announcing
and requesting comments in a notice of
availability in the Federal Register (75
FR 34154; June 16, 2010).
The Refuge is located in Washington
along the Columbia River. It was
established to secure vital winter habitat
for dusky Canada geese and other
waterfowl. The Refuge encompasses
5,218 acres of marshes, grasslands, and
woodlands on 5 units. We preserve the
natural Columbia River floodplain on
the Carty, Roth, and Ridgeport Dairy
units. We manage the River ‘S’ and
Bachelor Island units to provide habitat
for waterfowl and other wildlife.
Sandhill cranes, shorebirds, and a
variety of songbirds stop at the Refuge
during spring and fall migrations. Some
bird species, such as mallards, great
blue herons, and red-tailed hawks, nest
and reside on the Refuge year-round.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the FONSI for the final
CCP in accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We
completed a thorough analysis of
impacts on the human environment,
which we included in the draft CCP/EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering the Refuge for the
next 15 years. Alternative 2, as we
described in the draft CCP, is the
foundation for the CCP.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
In-Person Viewing or Pickup:
Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge,
28908 NW. Main Avenue, Ridgefield,
WA 98642.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
Flores, Project Leader, (360) 887–4109.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Alternative 1 (No Action)
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration
Act), as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires us to develop a
CCP for each refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. We
will review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Refuge Administration Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
During our CCP planning process we
identified several issues. To address the
issues, we developed and evaluated the
following alternatives in our Draft CCP/
EA.
Under Alternative 1, we would have
continued to manage and where feasible
restore habitat for dusky Canada geese,
other Canada geese subspecies, cackling
geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled
Federal and State listed species.
Hunting would continue on the River ‘S’
Unit’s 760-acre hunt area. The current
4.3-mile auto tour route would remain
open year round. The Refuge would
continue to coordinate with its Friends
groups, local educators, and Tribes to
conduct environmental and cultural
education and interpretation programs.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative 2, our preferred
alternative, we would continue to
protect, maintain, and, where feasible,
restore habitat for priority species,
including dusky Canada geese, other
waterfowl, and imperiled Federal and
State listed species. We would maintain
high-quality green forage for geese in
improved pastures and wet meadows,
and increase cropland and wet meadow
acreage. Wetlands would be managed to
increase productivity and reduce water
pumping costs. Invasive species and
State- and county-listed noxious weeds
would continue to be a primary
management concern. Enhancing and
restoring bottomland forest and oak
woodland habitats would increase. We
would complete habitat assessments to
guide stream and tidally influenced
wetland restorations. We would conduct
feasibility studies for reintroducing
native species such as Columbian whitetailed deer and western pond turtle, and
inventory and monitoring efforts would
increase.
Under Alternative 2, current public
use areas and closures would continue,
the waterfowl hunt area would remain
unchanged, and changes in wetland
management would improve the hunt
program over time. A new access point
to the River ‘S’ Unit, including a 2-lane
bridge and 1-mile entrance road, would
be developed. The current auto tour
route would be open year round, and
shortened slightly to provide habitat for
dusky Canada geese and cranes. A new
1.5-mile dike-top walking trail would be
constructed. Environmental and cultural
resources education and interpretation
would increase.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alternative 3
Under Alternative 3, actions to
protect, maintain, and restore habitat for
priority species are the same as those
under Alternative 2. Current public use
areas and closures would continue. The
waterfowl hunt area/location would
remain the same; however, core dusky
habitat on the south end of the River ‘S’
Unit (207 acres) would be closed to
goose hunting. The existing access point
to the River ‘S’ Unit would be retained;
a new 2-lane bridge would be
constructed to eliminate the at-grade
railroad crossing; and the entrance road
would be widened, requiring either land
acquisition or easement modification.
The existing auto tour route would not
change. A new 1.5-mile dike-top
walking trail would be constructed.
Environmental and cultural education
and interpretation would increase.
Alternative 4
Under Alternative 4, actions to
protect, maintain, and restore habitat for
priority species would be the same as
those under Alternatives 2 and 3, except
that slightly more crops would be
grown, and the total wildlife sanctuary
area closed to public use would be
reduced slightly. This alternative
would, however, provide the largest
contiguous sanctuary for dusky Canada
geese and sandhill cranes on the
Refuge’s south end. A new access point
to the River ‘S’ Unit, including a 2-lane
bridge and 1-mile entrance road, would
be developed. The south end of the
River ‘S’ Unit would be closed to public
use during waterfowl and crane
migration, to benefit dusky Canada
geese and sandhill cranes. The south
end of the River ‘S’ Unit (207 acres)
would be closed to hunting, and the
south end of the auto tour route would
be closed during waterfowl season
(October 1–March 15), reducing its
length from 4.3 miles to 2.6 miles
during that time. To offset the loss of
these hunting opportunities, 250 acres
of Bachelor Island would be opened to
waterfowl hunting. The northern
portion of this area would be closed
early to hunting (January 15) to prevent
disturbance to a great blue heron nesting
colony. A new 1.5-mile dike-top
walking trail would be constructed.
Environmental and cultural education
and interpretation would increase.
Comments
We solicited comments on the Draft
CCP/EA from June 16, 2010, to July 16,
2010 (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010). We
received 16 comment letters, forms, or
emails on the Draft CCP/EA. To address
public comments, minor changes and
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices
clarifications were made to the final
CCP where we determined it would be
appropriate.
DATES:
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we
received, we have selected Alternative 2
for implementation. By implementing
Alternative 2, we will protect, maintain,
and, where feasible, restore habitat for
dusky Canada geese, other waterfowl,
and imperiled species. We will maintain
high-quality green forage in pastures
and wet meadows, and increase
cropland and wet meadow acreage.
Wetlands will be managed to increase
productivity and reduce pumping costs.
Invasive species and noxious weeds will
continue to be a primary management
concern. Enhancing and restoring
bottomland forest and oak woodland
habitats will increase. We will complete
habitat assessments to guide stream and
tidally influenced wetland restorations.
We will conduct feasibility studies for
reintroducing native species such as
Columbian white-tailed deer and
western pond turtle, and inventory and
monitoring efforts will increase.
Current public use areas and closures
will continue, the waterfowl hunt area
will remain unchanged, and changes in
wetland management will improve the
hunt program over time. A new access
point to the River ‘S’ Unit will be
developed. The existing auto tour route
will be open year round, and shortened
slightly, to provide habitat for dusky
Canada geese and cranes. A new diketop walking trail will be constructed.
Environmental and cultural education
and interpretation programs will
increase.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland,
Oregon.
Protests of the survey must be
filed before March 18, 2011 to be
considered.
Protests of the survey
should be sent to Branch of Cadastral
Survey, Bureau of Land Management,
5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana
59101–4669.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh
Alexander, Cadastral Surveyor, Branch
of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land
Management, 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings, Montana 59101–4669,
telephone (406) 896–5123 or (406) 896–
5009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
survey was executed at the request of
the Bureau of Land Management, Dillon
Field Office, and was necessary to
determine federal interest lands.
The lands we surveyed are:
Principal Meridian, Montana
T. 2 S., R. 3 W.
The plat, in one sheet, representing
the dependent resurvey of Mineral
Survey No. 5856B, Charity Mill Site and
Supplemental Plat, Township 2 South,
Range 3 West, Principal Meridian,
Montana, was accepted January 27,
2011.
We will place a copy of the plat, in
one sheet, in the open files. It will be
available to the public as a matter of
information. If the BLM receives a
protest against this survey, as shown on
this plat, in one sheet, prior to the date
of the official filing, we will stay the
filing pending our consideration of the
protest. We will not officially file this
plat, in one sheet, until the day after we
have accepted or dismissed all protests
and they have become final, including
decisions or appeals.
Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Dated: February 9, 2011.
James D. Claflin,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of
Resources.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FR Doc. 2011–3544 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2011–3540 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
Bureau of Land Management
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Eastern
Montana Resource Advisory Council
(RAC), will meet as indicated below.
DATES: The next regular meeting of the
Eastern Montana Resource Advisory
Council will be held on Mar. 24, 2011
in Miles City, Montana. The meeting
will start at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at
approximately 3:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: When determined, the
meeting location will be announced in
a news release.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs Specialist,
BLM Eastern Montana/Dakotas District,
111 Garryowen Road, Miles City,
Montana 59301. Telephone: (406) 233–
2831.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15member Council advises the Secretary
of the Interior through the Bureau of
Land Management on a variety of
planning and management issues
associated with public land
management in Montana. At these
meetings, topics will include: Miles City
and Billings Field Office manager
updates, subcommittee briefings, work
sessions and other issues that the
council may raise. All meetings are
open to the public and the public may
present written comments to the
Council. Each formal Council meeting
will also have time allocated for hearing
public comments. Depending on the
number of persons wishing to comment
and time available, the time for
individual oral comments may be
limited. Individuals who plan to attend
and need special assistance, such as
sign language interpretation, tour
transportation or other reasonable
accommodations should contact the
BLM as provided above.
SUMMARY:
Dated: February 8, 2011.
M. Elaine Raper,
Manager, Eastern Montana—Dakotas District.
[FR Doc. 2011–3545 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
[LLMT926000–11–L14200000–BJ0000]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey;
Montana
Bureau of Land Management
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
9049
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of
survey.
Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern
Montana Resource Advisory Council
Meeting
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will file the plat of
survey of the lands described below in
the BLM Montana State Office, Billings,
Montana, on March 18, 2011.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
[LLMTC 00900.L16100000.DP0000]
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior, Montana, Billings and Miles
City Field Offices.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[2253–65]
Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural
Items: University of Pennsylvania
Museum of Archaeology and
Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
National Park Service, Interior.
16FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9047-9049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3540]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-R-2010-N220; 1265-0000-10137-S3]
Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Clark County, WA; Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact
for Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the environmental
assessment (EA) for the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge).
In this final CCP, we describe how we will manage this Refuge for the
next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the final CCP and FONSI by
any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or CD-ROM.
Agency Web Site: Download the CCP/FONSI at https://www.fws.gov/pacific/planning.
E-mail: FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. Include ``Ridgefield Refuge
final CCP'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 457,
Ridgefield, WA 98642.
[[Page 9048]]
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge,
28908 NW. Main Avenue, Ridgefield, WA 98642.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Flores, Project Leader, (360) 887-
4109.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we complete the CCP process for the Refuge. The
Service started this process through a notice of intent in the Federal
Register (71 FR 43787; August 2, 2006). We released the Draft CCP/EA to
the public, announcing and requesting comments in a notice of
availability in the Federal Register (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010).
The Refuge is located in Washington along the Columbia River. It
was established to secure vital winter habitat for dusky Canada geese
and other waterfowl. The Refuge encompasses 5,218 acres of marshes,
grasslands, and woodlands on 5 units. We preserve the natural Columbia
River floodplain on the Carty, Roth, and Ridgeport Dairy units. We
manage the River `S' and Bachelor Island units to provide habitat for
waterfowl and other wildlife. Sandhill cranes, shorebirds, and a
variety of songbirds stop at the Refuge during spring and fall
migrations. Some bird species, such as mallards, great blue herons, and
red-tailed hawks, nest and reside on the Refuge year-round.
We announce our decision and the availability of the FONSI for the
final CCP in accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
(40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We completed a thorough analysis of
impacts on the human environment, which we included in the draft CCP/
EA.
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering the Refuge for
the next 15 years. Alternative 2, as we described in the draft CCP, is
the foundation for the CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to
develop a CCP for each refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Refuge Administration Act.
CCP Alternatives, Including Selected Alternative
During our CCP planning process we identified several issues. To
address the issues, we developed and evaluated the following
alternatives in our Draft CCP/EA.
Alternative 1 (No Action)
Under Alternative 1, we would have continued to manage and where
feasible restore habitat for dusky Canada geese, other Canada geese
subspecies, cackling geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled Federal and
State listed species. Hunting would continue on the River `S' Unit's
760-acre hunt area. The current 4.3-mile auto tour route would remain
open year round. The Refuge would continue to coordinate with its
Friends groups, local educators, and Tribes to conduct environmental
and cultural education and interpretation programs.
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative 2, our preferred alternative, we would continue
to protect, maintain, and, where feasible, restore habitat for priority
species, including dusky Canada geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled
Federal and State listed species. We would maintain high-quality green
forage for geese in improved pastures and wet meadows, and increase
cropland and wet meadow acreage. Wetlands would be managed to increase
productivity and reduce water pumping costs. Invasive species and
State- and county-listed noxious weeds would continue to be a primary
management concern. Enhancing and restoring bottomland forest and oak
woodland habitats would increase. We would complete habitat assessments
to guide stream and tidally influenced wetland restorations. We would
conduct feasibility studies for reintroducing native species such as
Columbian white-tailed deer and western pond turtle, and inventory and
monitoring efforts would increase.
Under Alternative 2, current public use areas and closures would
continue, the waterfowl hunt area would remain unchanged, and changes
in wetland management would improve the hunt program over time. A new
access point to the River `S' Unit, including a 2-lane bridge and 1-
mile entrance road, would be developed. The current auto tour route
would be open year round, and shortened slightly to provide habitat for
dusky Canada geese and cranes. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail
would be constructed. Environmental and cultural resources education
and interpretation would increase.
Alternative 3
Under Alternative 3, actions to protect, maintain, and restore
habitat for priority species are the same as those under Alternative 2.
Current public use areas and closures would continue. The waterfowl
hunt area/location would remain the same; however, core dusky habitat
on the south end of the River `S' Unit (207 acres) would be closed to
goose hunting. The existing access point to the River `S' Unit would be
retained; a new 2-lane bridge would be constructed to eliminate the at-
grade railroad crossing; and the entrance road would be widened,
requiring either land acquisition or easement modification. The
existing auto tour route would not change. A new 1.5-mile dike-top
walking trail would be constructed. Environmental and cultural
education and interpretation would increase.
Alternative 4
Under Alternative 4, actions to protect, maintain, and restore
habitat for priority species would be the same as those under
Alternatives 2 and 3, except that slightly more crops would be grown,
and the total wildlife sanctuary area closed to public use would be
reduced slightly. This alternative would, however, provide the largest
contiguous sanctuary for dusky Canada geese and sandhill cranes on the
Refuge's south end. A new access point to the River `S' Unit, including
a 2-lane bridge and 1-mile entrance road, would be developed. The south
end of the River `S' Unit would be closed to public use during
waterfowl and crane migration, to benefit dusky Canada geese and
sandhill cranes. The south end of the River `S' Unit (207 acres) would
be closed to hunting, and the south end of the auto tour route would be
closed during waterfowl season (October 1-March 15), reducing its
length from 4.3 miles to 2.6 miles during that time. To offset the loss
of these hunting opportunities, 250 acres of Bachelor Island would be
opened to waterfowl hunting. The northern portion of this area would be
closed early to hunting (January 15) to prevent disturbance to a great
blue heron nesting colony. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail would
be constructed. Environmental and cultural education and interpretation
would increase.
Comments
We solicited comments on the Draft CCP/EA from June 16, 2010, to
July 16, 2010 (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010). We received 16 comment
letters, forms, or emails on the Draft CCP/EA. To address public
comments, minor changes and
[[Page 9049]]
clarifications were made to the final CCP where we determined it would
be appropriate.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we received, we have selected
Alternative 2 for implementation. By implementing Alternative 2, we
will protect, maintain, and, where feasible, restore habitat for dusky
Canada geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled species. We will maintain
high-quality green forage in pastures and wet meadows, and increase
cropland and wet meadow acreage. Wetlands will be managed to increase
productivity and reduce pumping costs. Invasive species and noxious
weeds will continue to be a primary management concern. Enhancing and
restoring bottomland forest and oak woodland habitats will increase. We
will complete habitat assessments to guide stream and tidally
influenced wetland restorations. We will conduct feasibility studies
for reintroducing native species such as Columbian white-tailed deer
and western pond turtle, and inventory and monitoring efforts will
increase.
Current public use areas and closures will continue, the waterfowl
hunt area will remain unchanged, and changes in wetland management will
improve the hunt program over time. A new access point to the River `S'
Unit will be developed. The existing auto tour route will be open year
round, and shortened slightly, to provide habitat for dusky Canada
geese and cranes. A new dike-top walking trail will be constructed.
Environmental and cultural education and interpretation programs will
increase.
Dated: December 20, 2010.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011-3540 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P