Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Clark County, WA; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment, 9047-9049 [2011-3540]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES the public interest, which includes but is not limited to consideration of potential impacts on affected local communities and Tribes. The determination will be based on a number of factors, including an economic analysis. One part of the economic analysis is a non-use valuation survey that is designed to determine the potential benefits of dam removal that may accrue to members of the U.S. public who value such improvements regardless of whether they consume Klamath Basin fish or visit the Klamath Basin. Non-use valuation surveys, such as the one discussed herein, are routinely included as a part of the economic analysis for large-scale water development projects. II. Data Title: Klamath Non-Use Valuation Survey. OMB Control Number: 1090–0010. Type of Review: Revision of an approved collection. Affected Entities: Households. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Frequency of Response: One time. Estimated Annual Number of Respondents: 10,400 households who will receive the survey (3200 respondents and 7,200 nonrespondents). Estimated Total Annual Responses: 3200. Estimated Time per Response: The base for this survey is 10,400 households. The households will be divided into two mailing groups, at a 10/90 split. The first wave of mailings will be to 10% of the households. Each household will receive a prenotification postcard notification, which will take 30 seconds to read, followed by the first mailing of the survey. 17% of households are estimated to respond, which will take 30 minutes. Nonrespondents will take 3 minutes. The second mailing will be sent to the remaining 83% of non-respondent households. 10% of the households are estimated to respond to the second mailing, taking 30 minutes. The second group of non-respondents are estimated to spend 3 minutes. The Department will then conduct preliminary analysis. The second wave of mailings will be to the remaining 90% of the households. Each household will receive a prenotification postcard notification, which will take 30 seconds to read, followed by the first mailing of the survey. 17% of households are estimated to respond, which will take 30 minutes. Non-respondents will take 3 minutes. The second phase will be sent to the remaining 83% of nonrespondent households. 10% of the VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 households are estimated to respond to the second mailing, taking 30 minutes. The second group of non-respondents are estimated to spend 3 minutes. The second group of non-respondents will be sent a reminder letter, taking 30 seconds. The letter will provide the web address of the survey and a toll-free number and email for the respondent to call or write to get another copy of the survey. 5% of the households are estimated to complete the survey, taking 30 minutes. After the reminder mailing, 20% of the nonrespondents will be sent a letter by Federal Express or Priority Mail with a letter and a much shorter version of the survey, taking approximately 30 seconds to read. It is assumed that 65% of the non-respondent households will have a phone number. For respondents with telephone numbers, the letter and survey will be followed by a phone call from a live operator who will either talk to the household or leave a message reiterating the higher incentive and offering to mail another copy of the survey if the household needs one. DOI expects that 20% of nonrespondents will complete the shorter survey after the phone call reminder, taking 10 minutes. The phone call without the completing the shorter survey is estimated to take 5 minutes. For the 35% of households without telephone numbers, DOI expects that 10% of nonrespondents will complete the survey after receiving the Federal Express letter. DOI estimates that 10% of nonrespondants will spend 5 minutes on the shorter survey and letter. DOI estimates 90% nonrespondents will spend 3 minutes on the survey and letter. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,571 hours. III. Request for Comments On August 30, 2010, we published in the Federal Register a request for public comments on this proposed survey. Revisions were subsequently made to the survey in response to comments that were received. This notice provides the public with an additional opportunity to comment on the revised survey. The Department of the Interior invites comments on: (1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection and the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9047 (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide information to or for a Federal agency. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. Dated: February 11, 2011. Benjamin M. Simon, Economics Staff Director, Office of Policy Analysis. [FR Doc. 2011–3506 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R1–R–2010–N220; 1265–0000–10137– S3] Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Clark County, WA; Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for Environmental Assessment Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the environmental assessment (EA) for the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). In this final CCP, we describe how we will manage this Refuge for the next 15 years. ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the final CCP and FONSI by any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or CD–ROM. Agency Web Site: Download the CCP/ FONSI at https://www.fws.gov/pacific/ planning. E-mail: FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. Include ‘‘Ridgefield Refuge final CCP’’ in the subject line of the message. Mail: Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 457, Ridgefield, WA 98642. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 9048 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices CCP Alternatives, Including Selected Alternative Introduction With this notice, we complete the CCP process for the Refuge. The Service started this process through a notice of intent in the Federal Register (71 FR 43787; August 2, 2006). We released the Draft CCP/EA to the public, announcing and requesting comments in a notice of availability in the Federal Register (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010). The Refuge is located in Washington along the Columbia River. It was established to secure vital winter habitat for dusky Canada geese and other waterfowl. The Refuge encompasses 5,218 acres of marshes, grasslands, and woodlands on 5 units. We preserve the natural Columbia River floodplain on the Carty, Roth, and Ridgeport Dairy units. We manage the River ‘S’ and Bachelor Island units to provide habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife. Sandhill cranes, shorebirds, and a variety of songbirds stop at the Refuge during spring and fall migrations. Some bird species, such as mallards, great blue herons, and red-tailed hawks, nest and reside on the Refuge year-round. We announce our decision and the availability of the FONSI for the final CCP in accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We completed a thorough analysis of impacts on the human environment, which we included in the draft CCP/EA. The CCP will guide us in managing and administering the Refuge for the next 15 years. Alternative 2, as we described in the draft CCP, is the foundation for the CCP. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, 28908 NW. Main Avenue, Ridgefield, WA 98642. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Flores, Project Leader, (360) 887–4109. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alternative 1 (No Action) Background The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to develop a CCP for each refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Refuge Administration Act. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 During our CCP planning process we identified several issues. To address the issues, we developed and evaluated the following alternatives in our Draft CCP/ EA. Under Alternative 1, we would have continued to manage and where feasible restore habitat for dusky Canada geese, other Canada geese subspecies, cackling geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled Federal and State listed species. Hunting would continue on the River ‘S’ Unit’s 760-acre hunt area. The current 4.3-mile auto tour route would remain open year round. The Refuge would continue to coordinate with its Friends groups, local educators, and Tribes to conduct environmental and cultural education and interpretation programs. Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative) Under Alternative 2, our preferred alternative, we would continue to protect, maintain, and, where feasible, restore habitat for priority species, including dusky Canada geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled Federal and State listed species. We would maintain high-quality green forage for geese in improved pastures and wet meadows, and increase cropland and wet meadow acreage. Wetlands would be managed to increase productivity and reduce water pumping costs. Invasive species and State- and county-listed noxious weeds would continue to be a primary management concern. Enhancing and restoring bottomland forest and oak woodland habitats would increase. We would complete habitat assessments to guide stream and tidally influenced wetland restorations. We would conduct feasibility studies for reintroducing native species such as Columbian whitetailed deer and western pond turtle, and inventory and monitoring efforts would increase. Under Alternative 2, current public use areas and closures would continue, the waterfowl hunt area would remain unchanged, and changes in wetland management would improve the hunt program over time. A new access point to the River ‘S’ Unit, including a 2-lane bridge and 1-mile entrance road, would be developed. The current auto tour route would be open year round, and shortened slightly to provide habitat for dusky Canada geese and cranes. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail would be constructed. Environmental and cultural resources education and interpretation would increase. PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Alternative 3 Under Alternative 3, actions to protect, maintain, and restore habitat for priority species are the same as those under Alternative 2. Current public use areas and closures would continue. The waterfowl hunt area/location would remain the same; however, core dusky habitat on the south end of the River ‘S’ Unit (207 acres) would be closed to goose hunting. The existing access point to the River ‘S’ Unit would be retained; a new 2-lane bridge would be constructed to eliminate the at-grade railroad crossing; and the entrance road would be widened, requiring either land acquisition or easement modification. The existing auto tour route would not change. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail would be constructed. Environmental and cultural education and interpretation would increase. Alternative 4 Under Alternative 4, actions to protect, maintain, and restore habitat for priority species would be the same as those under Alternatives 2 and 3, except that slightly more crops would be grown, and the total wildlife sanctuary area closed to public use would be reduced slightly. This alternative would, however, provide the largest contiguous sanctuary for dusky Canada geese and sandhill cranes on the Refuge’s south end. A new access point to the River ‘S’ Unit, including a 2-lane bridge and 1-mile entrance road, would be developed. The south end of the River ‘S’ Unit would be closed to public use during waterfowl and crane migration, to benefit dusky Canada geese and sandhill cranes. The south end of the River ‘S’ Unit (207 acres) would be closed to hunting, and the south end of the auto tour route would be closed during waterfowl season (October 1–March 15), reducing its length from 4.3 miles to 2.6 miles during that time. To offset the loss of these hunting opportunities, 250 acres of Bachelor Island would be opened to waterfowl hunting. The northern portion of this area would be closed early to hunting (January 15) to prevent disturbance to a great blue heron nesting colony. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail would be constructed. Environmental and cultural education and interpretation would increase. Comments We solicited comments on the Draft CCP/EA from June 16, 2010, to July 16, 2010 (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010). We received 16 comment letters, forms, or emails on the Draft CCP/EA. To address public comments, minor changes and E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices clarifications were made to the final CCP where we determined it would be appropriate. DATES: Selected Alternative After considering the comments we received, we have selected Alternative 2 for implementation. By implementing Alternative 2, we will protect, maintain, and, where feasible, restore habitat for dusky Canada geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled species. We will maintain high-quality green forage in pastures and wet meadows, and increase cropland and wet meadow acreage. Wetlands will be managed to increase productivity and reduce pumping costs. Invasive species and noxious weeds will continue to be a primary management concern. Enhancing and restoring bottomland forest and oak woodland habitats will increase. We will complete habitat assessments to guide stream and tidally influenced wetland restorations. We will conduct feasibility studies for reintroducing native species such as Columbian white-tailed deer and western pond turtle, and inventory and monitoring efforts will increase. Current public use areas and closures will continue, the waterfowl hunt area will remain unchanged, and changes in wetland management will improve the hunt program over time. A new access point to the River ‘S’ Unit will be developed. The existing auto tour route will be open year round, and shortened slightly, to provide habitat for dusky Canada geese and cranes. A new diketop walking trail will be constructed. Environmental and cultural education and interpretation programs will increase. ADDRESSES: Dated: December 20, 2010. Richard R. Hannan, Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon. Protests of the survey must be filed before March 18, 2011 to be considered. Protests of the survey should be sent to Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101–4669. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh Alexander, Cadastral Surveyor, Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101–4669, telephone (406) 896–5123 or (406) 896– 5009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of the Bureau of Land Management, Dillon Field Office, and was necessary to determine federal interest lands. The lands we surveyed are: Principal Meridian, Montana T. 2 S., R. 3 W. The plat, in one sheet, representing the dependent resurvey of Mineral Survey No. 5856B, Charity Mill Site and Supplemental Plat, Township 2 South, Range 3 West, Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted January 27, 2011. We will place a copy of the plat, in one sheet, in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. If the BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on this plat, in one sheet, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. We will not officially file this plat, in one sheet, until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions or appeals. Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3. BILLING CODE 4310–55–P Dated: February 9, 2011. James D. Claflin, Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR [FR Doc. 2011–3544 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2011–3540 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P Bureau of Land Management In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below. DATES: The next regular meeting of the Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council will be held on Mar. 24, 2011 in Miles City, Montana. The meeting will start at 8:00 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 3:30 p.m. ADDRESSES: When determined, the meeting location will be announced in a news release. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Jacobsen, Public Affairs Specialist, BLM Eastern Montana/Dakotas District, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, Montana 59301. Telephone: (406) 233– 2831. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Montana. At these meetings, topics will include: Miles City and Billings Field Office manager updates, subcommittee briefings, work sessions and other issues that the council may raise. All meetings are open to the public and the public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, tour transportation or other reasonable accommodations should contact the BLM as provided above. SUMMARY: Dated: February 8, 2011. M. Elaine Raper, Manager, Eastern Montana—Dakotas District. [FR Doc. 2011–3545 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] [LLMT926000–11–L14200000–BJ0000] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Montana Bureau of Land Management AGENCY: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 9049 Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey. Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern Montana Resource Advisory Council Meeting The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM Montana State Office, Billings, Montana, on March 18, 2011. SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 [LLMTC 00900.L16100000.DP0000] Bureau of Land Management, Interior, Montana, Billings and Miles City Field Offices. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 BILLING CODE 4310–DN–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [2253–65] Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural Items: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM National Park Service, Interior. 16FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9047-9049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R1-R-2010-N220; 1265-0000-10137-S3]


Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Clark County, WA; Final 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact 
for Environmental Assessment

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and 
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the environmental 
assessment (EA) for the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). 
In this final CCP, we describe how we will manage this Refuge for the 
next 15 years.

ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the final CCP and FONSI by 
any of the following methods. You may request a hard copy or CD-ROM.
    Agency Web Site: Download the CCP/FONSI at https://www.fws.gov/pacific/planning.
    E-mail: FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. Include ``Ridgefield Refuge 
final CCP'' in the subject line of the message.
    Mail: Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 457, 
Ridgefield, WA 98642.

[[Page 9048]]

    In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, 
28908 NW. Main Avenue, Ridgefield, WA 98642.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Flores, Project Leader, (360) 887-
4109.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Introduction

    With this notice, we complete the CCP process for the Refuge. The 
Service started this process through a notice of intent in the Federal 
Register (71 FR 43787; August 2, 2006). We released the Draft CCP/EA to 
the public, announcing and requesting comments in a notice of 
availability in the Federal Register (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010).
    The Refuge is located in Washington along the Columbia River. It 
was established to secure vital winter habitat for dusky Canada geese 
and other waterfowl. The Refuge encompasses 5,218 acres of marshes, 
grasslands, and woodlands on 5 units. We preserve the natural Columbia 
River floodplain on the Carty, Roth, and Ridgeport Dairy units. We 
manage the River `S' and Bachelor Island units to provide habitat for 
waterfowl and other wildlife. Sandhill cranes, shorebirds, and a 
variety of songbirds stop at the Refuge during spring and fall 
migrations. Some bird species, such as mallards, great blue herons, and 
red-tailed hawks, nest and reside on the Refuge year-round.
    We announce our decision and the availability of the FONSI for the 
final CCP in accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
(40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We completed a thorough analysis of 
impacts on the human environment, which we included in the draft CCP/
EA.
    The CCP will guide us in managing and administering the Refuge for 
the next 15 years. Alternative 2, as we described in the draft CCP, is 
the foundation for the CCP.

Background

    The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Refuge Administration Act), as amended by the 
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, requires us to 
develop a CCP for each refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to 
provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge 
purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife 
Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife 
management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. We will 
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with 
the Refuge Administration Act.

CCP Alternatives, Including Selected Alternative

    During our CCP planning process we identified several issues. To 
address the issues, we developed and evaluated the following 
alternatives in our Draft CCP/EA.

Alternative 1 (No Action)

    Under Alternative 1, we would have continued to manage and where 
feasible restore habitat for dusky Canada geese, other Canada geese 
subspecies, cackling geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled Federal and 
State listed species. Hunting would continue on the River `S' Unit's 
760-acre hunt area. The current 4.3-mile auto tour route would remain 
open year round. The Refuge would continue to coordinate with its 
Friends groups, local educators, and Tribes to conduct environmental 
and cultural education and interpretation programs.

Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)

    Under Alternative 2, our preferred alternative, we would continue 
to protect, maintain, and, where feasible, restore habitat for priority 
species, including dusky Canada geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled 
Federal and State listed species. We would maintain high-quality green 
forage for geese in improved pastures and wet meadows, and increase 
cropland and wet meadow acreage. Wetlands would be managed to increase 
productivity and reduce water pumping costs. Invasive species and 
State- and county-listed noxious weeds would continue to be a primary 
management concern. Enhancing and restoring bottomland forest and oak 
woodland habitats would increase. We would complete habitat assessments 
to guide stream and tidally influenced wetland restorations. We would 
conduct feasibility studies for reintroducing native species such as 
Columbian white-tailed deer and western pond turtle, and inventory and 
monitoring efforts would increase.
    Under Alternative 2, current public use areas and closures would 
continue, the waterfowl hunt area would remain unchanged, and changes 
in wetland management would improve the hunt program over time. A new 
access point to the River `S' Unit, including a 2-lane bridge and 1-
mile entrance road, would be developed. The current auto tour route 
would be open year round, and shortened slightly to provide habitat for 
dusky Canada geese and cranes. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail 
would be constructed. Environmental and cultural resources education 
and interpretation would increase.

Alternative 3

    Under Alternative 3, actions to protect, maintain, and restore 
habitat for priority species are the same as those under Alternative 2. 
Current public use areas and closures would continue. The waterfowl 
hunt area/location would remain the same; however, core dusky habitat 
on the south end of the River `S' Unit (207 acres) would be closed to 
goose hunting. The existing access point to the River `S' Unit would be 
retained; a new 2-lane bridge would be constructed to eliminate the at-
grade railroad crossing; and the entrance road would be widened, 
requiring either land acquisition or easement modification. The 
existing auto tour route would not change. A new 1.5-mile dike-top 
walking trail would be constructed. Environmental and cultural 
education and interpretation would increase.

Alternative 4

    Under Alternative 4, actions to protect, maintain, and restore 
habitat for priority species would be the same as those under 
Alternatives 2 and 3, except that slightly more crops would be grown, 
and the total wildlife sanctuary area closed to public use would be 
reduced slightly. This alternative would, however, provide the largest 
contiguous sanctuary for dusky Canada geese and sandhill cranes on the 
Refuge's south end. A new access point to the River `S' Unit, including 
a 2-lane bridge and 1-mile entrance road, would be developed. The south 
end of the River `S' Unit would be closed to public use during 
waterfowl and crane migration, to benefit dusky Canada geese and 
sandhill cranes. The south end of the River `S' Unit (207 acres) would 
be closed to hunting, and the south end of the auto tour route would be 
closed during waterfowl season (October 1-March 15), reducing its 
length from 4.3 miles to 2.6 miles during that time. To offset the loss 
of these hunting opportunities, 250 acres of Bachelor Island would be 
opened to waterfowl hunting. The northern portion of this area would be 
closed early to hunting (January 15) to prevent disturbance to a great 
blue heron nesting colony. A new 1.5-mile dike-top walking trail would 
be constructed. Environmental and cultural education and interpretation 
would increase.

Comments

    We solicited comments on the Draft CCP/EA from June 16, 2010, to 
July 16, 2010 (75 FR 34154; June 16, 2010). We received 16 comment 
letters, forms, or emails on the Draft CCP/EA. To address public 
comments, minor changes and

[[Page 9049]]

clarifications were made to the final CCP where we determined it would 
be appropriate.

Selected Alternative

    After considering the comments we received, we have selected 
Alternative 2 for implementation. By implementing Alternative 2, we 
will protect, maintain, and, where feasible, restore habitat for dusky 
Canada geese, other waterfowl, and imperiled species. We will maintain 
high-quality green forage in pastures and wet meadows, and increase 
cropland and wet meadow acreage. Wetlands will be managed to increase 
productivity and reduce pumping costs. Invasive species and noxious 
weeds will continue to be a primary management concern. Enhancing and 
restoring bottomland forest and oak woodland habitats will increase. We 
will complete habitat assessments to guide stream and tidally 
influenced wetland restorations. We will conduct feasibility studies 
for reintroducing native species such as Columbian white-tailed deer 
and western pond turtle, and inventory and monitoring efforts will 
increase.
    Current public use areas and closures will continue, the waterfowl 
hunt area will remain unchanged, and changes in wetland management will 
improve the hunt program over time. A new access point to the River `S' 
Unit will be developed. The existing auto tour route will be open year 
round, and shortened slightly, to provide habitat for dusky Canada 
geese and cranes. A new dike-top walking trail will be constructed. 
Environmental and cultural education and interpretation programs will 
increase.

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2011-3540 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.