Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of Existing Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf-Acquire a Lease Noncompetitively, 8962-8965 [2011-3515]
Download as PDF
8962
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
and if so, in what manner to improve
efficacy of the rule, particularly as
applied to suppliers of services and
goods in the recipient country?
› Should USAID modify the ‘‘special
source rules,’’ FAA 604(b), (c), (e), (f),
and (g), and reflected in 22 CFR 228.13,
for procurement of agricultural
commodities, vehicles or
pharmaceuticals within limitations set
forth in the FAA; and, if so, in what
manner?
› Should references in 22 CFR part
228 to other statutory requirements,
such as the Fly America Act (49 U.S.C
40118) be removed or changed?
Specifically is it useful for USAID to
include Agency-specific policy and
procedures in 22 CFR Part 228, when
separate statutes and prevailing
regulatory systems are already in place
and publicly available from other
sources?
› What difficulties do contractors and
grantees encounter when requesting a
waiver to procure in any country other
than those in the approved geographic
code for each USAID-funded agreement
(contract or grant?) How can the
USAID’s waiver guidance be modified
or improved for more clear and cost
effective application of the statutory and
regulatory waiver requirements?
If commenters suggest modification,
USAID requests specific proposals for
what elements of 22 CFR Part 228
should be modified. USAID requests
commenters to provide information and
supporting data related to:
• The potential costs of modifying the
existing regulatory language noted
above.
• The potential quantifiable
efficiency benefits of modifying the
regulatory language noted above.
Revisions to this regulation will have
an impact on related provisions in the
48 CFR 7 Agency for International
Development Acquisition Regulation
(AIDAR) and various chapters in
USAID’s Automated Directives System
(ADS), including but not limited to ADS
chapters 303, 310, and 311 (the ADS is
accessible at https://www.usaid.gov/
policy/ads/).
Dated: February 1, 2011.
John Niemeyer,
Assistant General Counsel, USAID.
[FR Doc. 2011–3401 Filed 2–11–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:27 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
Regulation and Enforcement
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Timothy Redding at (703) 787–1219.
Background
BOEMRE originally published the
proposed revision for comment as a
[Docket ID: BOEM–2010–0045]
direct final rule in the Federal Register
RIN 1010–AD71
on November 26, 2010. That document
stated that if BOEMRE received a
Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of
significant adverse comment concerning
Existing Facilities on the Outer
the rulemaking, it would withdraw the
Continental Shelf—Acquire a Lease
direct final rule and publish a notice of
Noncompetitively
proposed rulemaking. BOEMRE did
receive significant adverse comment on
AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy
the direct final rulemaking and on
Management, Regulation and
January 25, 2011, published in the
Enforcement (BOEMRE), Interior.
Federal Register a notice of withdrawal
ACTION: Proposed rule.
and statement of intent to reinitiate
rulemaking by publishing this proposed
SUMMARY: BOEMRE proposes to revise
rule.
the regulations that pertain to
The regulations at 30 CFR part 285
noncompetitive acquisition of an Outer
govern renewable energy leasing and
Continental Shelf (OCS) renewable
alternate uses of existing facilities on
energy lease. We are taking this action
the OCS. This proposed rule would
because the current regulations
revise the regulations at §§ 285.231 and
governing the noncompetitive
acquisition of an OCS renewable energy 285.232. The regulations at § 285.231
address unsolicited requests for
lease initiated by BOEMRE and a
noncompetitive leases. The regulations
request for a noncompetitive OCS
at § 285.232 address the acquisition of
renewable energy lease initiated by an
noncompetitive leases in response to a
unsolicited request are inconsistent.
Request for Interest (RFI) or a Call for
This rulemaking will make the two
Information and Nomination (Call). The
processes consistent with each other by
process for awarding leases
eliminating a duplicative and
unnecessary step in the noncompetitive noncompetitively outlined in these two
sections is currently inconsistent.
leasing process, while continuing to
As currently written, § 285.231 allows
provide for adequate public notice and
the award of a noncompetitive lease
review of leasing proposals as required
after BOEMRE receives an unsolicited
by law.
request for a noncompetitive lease,
DATES: Comment Due Date: Submit
provided that BOEMRE determines that
comments on the proposed rule by
there is no competitive interest after
March 18, 2011.
publishing a single notice of a request
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
for interest relating to the unsolicited
on the rulemaking by any of the
request for a noncompetitive lease.
following methods. Please use the
As currently written, § 285.232
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
provides that, after BOEMRE publishes
an RFI or Call, if a respondent indicates
1010–AD71 as an identifier in your
interest in leasing an area for which no
message. See also Public Availability of
other party has indicated interest,
Comments under Procedural Matters.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// BOEMRE may offer a lease through a
noncompetitive process. However, the
www.regulations.gov. In the entry titled
regulations require the publication of a
‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter BOEM–
second RFI notice to confirm the
2010–0045, then click search. Follow
absence of competition before
the instructions to submit public
proceeding with the noncompetitive
comments and view supporting and
process. We believe that this
related materials available for this
requirement for a second notice is
rulemaking. BOEMRE will post all
redundant and is at odds with the
comments.
• Mail or hand-carry comments to the noncompetitive process prescribed for
cases in which a party submits an
Department of the Interior; Bureau of
unsolicited request for an OCS
Ocean Energy Management, Regulation
and Enforcement; Attention: Regulations renewable energy lease, where BOEMRE
and Standards Branch (RSB); 381 Elden is required to publish only a single
notice. Eliminating this discrepancy and
Street, MS–4024, Herndon, Virginia
20170–4817. Please reference ‘‘Acquire a requiring only one RFI notice would
make BOEMRE’s leasing processes more
Lease Noncompetitively, 1010–AD71’’
streamlined and efficient while
in your comments and include your
maintaining BOEMRE’s obligation to
name and address.
30 CFR Part 285
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16FEP1.SGM
16FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
notify the public of areas that may be
leased, solicit public input regarding
those areas, and determine whether
competitive interest exists in acquiring
such leases in the proposed area(s).
Accordingly, BOEMRE proposes to
revise § 285.231(d)(1) to state that we
will publish in the Federal Register a
notice that there is no competitive
interest. We would also revise
§ 285.232(c) to refer back to § 285.231(d)
through (i) instead of referring back to
§ 285.231(b) through (i).
sufficient for the purpose of determining
whether competitive interest existed,
while eliminating unnecessary,
inconsistent, and inefficient repetition
in the renewable energy leasing process
when it is initiated by BOEMRE.
BOEMRE will consider the eight
comments already received as they
relate to this proposed rulemaking
unless they are withdrawn by the
commenters, and those commenters are
welcome to submit additional
comments.
Comments on the Direct Final
Rulemaking
BOEMRE received a total of eight
comments in response to the direct final
rulemaking published on November 26,
2010. All of the comments objected to
the rulemaking, characterizing its effect
as improper rushing by BOEMRE to
allow offshore renewable energy leasing
and development. Four comments took
issue specifically with the direct final
rulemaking process itself and called for
a proposed rule and comment
procedure. Five of the comments stated
that the current wording of 30 CFR
285.231 and 232 should be retained. A
majority of the commenters appeared to
misunderstand the effect of the
proposed revision, evidencing a belief
that it would remove the requirement
for public notice to determine
competitive interest altogether.
However, one comment, which
appeared to accurately understand the
effect of the rulemaking, recommended
retention of the current wording, stating
that, ‘‘[t]he current regulations provide
an added level of protection by ensuring
that the public has adequate notice of
any requests for interest relating to
proposals to construct offshore
alternative energy projects, giving
competitive interests the chance to
participate and submit alternative bids
and the public an opportunity to
express concerns and make comments.’’
BOEMRE has determined that it
received significant adverse comment
on the direct final rule, which was
defined in the November 26 notice as ‘‘a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach or would be ineffective and
unacceptable without a change.’’ It is
therefore publishing this proposed rule
for public comment.
However, BOEMRE believes that the
intent and effect of the proposed
regulatory revision were largely
misunderstood by most of the
commenters. This proposed rule would
maintain adequate public notice of
leasing proposals and would be
Procedural Matters
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This proposed rule would not be a
significant rule as determined by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and is not subject to review
under E.O. 12866.
(1) This proposed rule would not have
an annual effect of $100 million or more
on the economy. It would not adversely
affect in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
(2) This proposed rule would not
create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency. The
proposed rule is intended to eliminate
redundancy and inefficiency.
(3) This proposed rule would not alter
the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights or obligations of their recipients.
(4) This proposed rule would not raise
novel legal or policy issues arising out
of legal mandates, the President’s
priorities, or the principles set forth in
E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The Department
prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
for 30 CFR part 285, and concluded that
the regulations will impact a substantial
number of small entities, but will not
have a significant economic impact on
the small entities in comparison to the
impacts on large entities. That analysis
was discussed in detail in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking for 30 CFR part
285 published in the Federal Register
on July 9, 2008 (73 FR 39376).
The North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code for
the industries affected by this rule is
221119 (Other Electric Power
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8963
Generation). The definition for this code
is:
‘‘This U.S. industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
operating electric power generation facilities
(except hydroelectric, fossil fuel, nuclear).
These facilities convert other forms of energy,
such as solar, wind, or tidal power, into
electrical energy. The electric energy
produced in these establishments is provided
to electric power transmission systems or to
electric power distribution systems.’’
It is possible that this proposed rule
could eventually affect entities that
produce hydrogen and fall under NAICS
Code 325120 (Industrial Gas
Manufacturing). The definition for this
code is:
‘‘This industry comprises establishments
primarily engaged in manufacturing
industrial organic and inorganic gases in
compressed, liquid, or solid forms.’’
Given the original findings of the
regulatory flexibility analysis done for
30 CFR part 285, as well as the minor
adjustment to the renewable energy
leasing process that is contemplated, the
proposed rule would not have a
significant effect on a substantial
number of small entities.
Your comments are important. The
Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were
established to receive comments from
small businesses about Federal agency
enforcement actions. The Ombudsman
will annually evaluate the enforcement
activities and rate each Agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on the actions of
BOEMRE, call 1–888–734–3247. You
may comment to the Small Business
Administration without fear of
retaliation. Allegations of
discrimination/retaliation filed with the
Small Business Administration will be
investigated for appropriate action.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This proposed rule is not a major rule
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.). This proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
E:\FR\FM\16FEP1.SGM
16FEP1
8964
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
The requirements would apply
indiscriminately to entities intending to
acquire a renewable energy lease on the
OCS pursuant to 30 CFR part 285.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule would not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
proposed rule would not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) is not required.
Takings Implication Assessment (E.O.
12630)
Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this
proposed rule does not have significant
takings implications. The proposed rule
is not a governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. A Takings
Implication Assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this
proposed rule does not have federalism
implications. This proposed rule would
not substantially and directly affect the
relationship between the Federal and
State Governments. To the extent that
State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this proposed rule
would not affect that role. A Federalism
Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This proposed rule complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this proposed rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated this proposed rule and
determined that it has no substantial
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This proposed rulemaking contains
no new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements; therefore, an OMB
submission under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required. The PRA
provides that an agency may not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:27 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Until OMB approves a collection of
information and assigns a control
number, you are not required to
respond. The revisions in this
rulemaking refer to, but would not
change, information collection
requirements in 30 CFR part 285. The
OMB approved the referenced
information collection requirements
under OMB Control Number 1010–0176
(expiration 3/31/2013).
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969
This proposed rule does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment. BOEMRE has
analyzed this proposed rule under the
criteria of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and the Department’s
regulations implementing NEPA. This
proposed rule meets the criteria set forth
at 43 CFR 46.210(i) for a Departmental
Categorical Exclusion in that this
proposed rule is ‘‘* * * of an
administrative, financial, legal,
technical, or procedural nature; or
whose environmental effects are too
broad, speculative, or conjectural to
lend themselves to meaningful analysis
* * *’’ Further, BOEMRE has analyzed
this proposed rule to determine if it
meets any of the extraordinary
circumstances that would require an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement as set
forth in 43 CFR 46.215 and concluded
that this proposed rule, being purely
procedural, does not meet any of the
criteria for extraordinary circumstances.
Data Quality Act
In developing this proposed rule,
BOEMRE did not conduct or use a
study, experiment, or survey requiring
peer review under the Data Quality Act
(Pub. L. 106–554, app. C § 515, 114 Stat.
2763, 2763A–153–154).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant
energy action under the definition in
E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Clarity of This Proposed Regulation
BOEMRE is required by E.O. 12866,
E.O. 12988, and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
proposed rule, your comments should
be as specific as possible. For example,
you should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 285
Continental shelf, Environmental
protection, Public lands.
Dated: February 9, 2011.
Wilma A. Lewis,
Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals
Management.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOEMRE) proposes to
amend 30 CFR part 285 as follows:
PART 285—RENEWABLE ENERGY
AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING
FACILITIES ON THE OUTER
CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for part 285
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 43
U.S.C. 1337.
2. Amend § 285.231 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
§ 285.231 How will BOEMRE process my
unsolicited request for a noncompetitive
lease?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) We will publish in the Federal
Register a notice that there is no
competitive interest; and
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 285.232 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\16FEP1.SGM
16FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
§ 285.232 May I acquire a lease
noncompetitively after responding to a
Request for Interest or Call for Information
and Nominations under § 285.213?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) After receiving the acquisition fee,
BOEMRE will follow the process
outlined in § 285.231(d) through (i).
[FR Doc. 2011–3515 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 100
RIN 0907–AA
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program: Revisions to the Vaccine
Injury Table
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public
hearing.
AGENCY:
This document announces a
public hearing to receive information
and views on the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ‘‘National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program:
Revisions to the Vaccine Injury Table.’’
Date and Time: The public hearing
will be held on March 4, 2011, from
11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Place: The public hearing will be held
in Conference Room G in the Parklawn
Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville,
Maryland 20857.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Geoffrey Evans, Director, Division of
Vaccine Injury Compensation, at 301–
443–6593 or by e-mail at
gevans@hrsa.gov.
SUMMARY:
The
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
of 1986, Title III of Public Law 99–660,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 300aa–10 et
seq.), established the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for
persons found to be injured by vaccines.
The Secretary has taken the necessary
initial steps to transfer four vaccines
covered under the VICP from the
provisional category in the Vaccine
Injury Table to their own separate
categories, with no associated injuries.
These proposed changes would not
change the rights of any current or
potential VICP petitioners.
The NPRM was published in the
Federal Register, September 13, 2010:
75 FR 55503. The public comment
period closes March 14, 2011.
A public hearing will be held during
the 180-day public comment period.
This hearing is to provide an open
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:26 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
forum for the presentation of
information and views concerning all
aspects of the NPRM by interested
persons.
In preparing a final regulation, the
Secretary will consider the
administrative record of this hearing
along with all other written comments
received during the comment period
specified in the NPRM. Individuals or
representatives of interested
organizations are invited to participate
in the public hearing in accord with the
schedule and procedures set forth
below.
The hearing will be held on March 4,
2011, beginning at 11:30 a.m. in
Conference Room G in the Parklawn
Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville,
Maryland 20857. Upon entering the
Parklawn Building, persons who wish to
attend the hearing will be required to
call Mr. Mario Lombre at (301) 443–
3196 to be escorted to Conference Room
G.
The presiding officer representing the
Secretary, HHS will be Dr. Geoffrey
Evans, Director, Division of Vaccine
Injury Compensation, Healthcare
Systems Bureau (HSB), Health
Resources and Services Administration.
Persons who wish to participate are
requested to file a notice of participation
with the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) on or before
March 1, 2011. The notice should be
mailed to the Division of Vaccine Injury
Compensation, HSB, Room 11C–26,
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, Maryland 20857. To ensure
timely handling any outer envelope
should be clearly marked ‘‘NPRM
Hearing.’’ The notice of participation
should contain the interested person’s
name, address, e-mail address,
telephone number, any business or
organizational affiliation of the person
desiring to make a presentation, a brief
summary of the presentation, and the
approximate time requested for the
presentation. Groups that have similar
interests should consolidate their
comments as part of one presentation.
Time available for the hearing will be
allocated among the persons who
properly file notices of participation. If
time permits, interested parties
attending the hearing who did not
submit notice of participation in
advance will be allowed to make an oral
presentation at the conclusion of the
hearing.
Persons who find that there is
insufficient time to submit the required
information in writing may give oral
notice of participation by calling Dr.
Geoffrey Evans, Director, Division of
Vaccine Injury Compensation, at (301)
443–6593 no later than March 1, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8965
Those persons who give oral notice of
participation should also submit written
notice containing the information
described above to HHS by the close of
business March 2, 2011.
After reviewing the notices of
participation and accompanying
information, HHS will schedule each
appearance and notify each participant
by mail, e-mail or telephone of the time
allotted to the person(s) and the
approximate time the person’s oral
presentation is scheduled to begin.
Written comments and transcripts of
the hearing will be made available for
public inspection as soon as they have
been prepared, on weekdays (Federal
holidays excepted) between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. at the Division of
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,
Room 11C–26, Parklawn Building, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland
20857.
Dated: February 10, 2011.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–3523 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2011–002; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1178]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Comments are requested on
the proposed Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and proposed
BFE modifications for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose
of this proposed rule is to seek general
information and comment regarding the
proposed regulatory flood elevations for
the reach described by the downstream
and upstream locations in the table
below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are
a part of the floodplain management
measures that the community is
required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to
qualify or remain qualified for
participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition,
these elevations, once finalized, will be
used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16FEP1.SGM
16FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8962-8965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3515]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 285
[Docket ID: BOEM-2010-0045]
RIN 1010-AD71
Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of Existing Facilities on the
Outer Continental Shelf--Acquire a Lease Noncompetitively
AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
(BOEMRE), Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: BOEMRE proposes to revise the regulations that pertain to
noncompetitive acquisition of an Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
renewable energy lease. We are taking this action because the current
regulations governing the noncompetitive acquisition of an OCS
renewable energy lease initiated by BOEMRE and a request for a
noncompetitive OCS renewable energy lease initiated by an unsolicited
request are inconsistent. This rulemaking will make the two processes
consistent with each other by eliminating a duplicative and unnecessary
step in the noncompetitive leasing process, while continuing to provide
for adequate public notice and review of leasing proposals as required
by law.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Submit comments on the proposed rule by March
18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the rulemaking by any of the
following methods. Please use the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1010-AD71 as an identifier in your message. See also Public
Availability of Comments under Procedural Matters.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. In
the entry titled ``Enter Keyword or ID,'' enter BOEM-2010-0045, then
click search. Follow the instructions to submit public comments and
view supporting and related materials available for this rulemaking.
BOEMRE will post all comments.
Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the
Interior; Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and
Enforcement; Attention: Regulations and Standards Branch (RSB); 381
Elden Street, MS-4024, Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817. Please reference
``Acquire a Lease Noncompetitively, 1010-AD71'' in your comments and
include your name and address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Redding at (703) 787-1219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
BOEMRE originally published the proposed revision for comment as a
direct final rule in the Federal Register on November 26, 2010. That
document stated that if BOEMRE received a significant adverse comment
concerning the rulemaking, it would withdraw the direct final rule and
publish a notice of proposed rulemaking. BOEMRE did receive significant
adverse comment on the direct final rulemaking and on January 25, 2011,
published in the Federal Register a notice of withdrawal and statement
of intent to reinitiate rulemaking by publishing this proposed rule.
The regulations at 30 CFR part 285 govern renewable energy leasing
and alternate uses of existing facilities on the OCS. This proposed
rule would revise the regulations at Sec. Sec. 285.231 and 285.232.
The regulations at Sec. 285.231 address unsolicited requests for
noncompetitive leases. The regulations at Sec. 285.232 address the
acquisition of noncompetitive leases in response to a Request for
Interest (RFI) or a Call for Information and Nomination (Call). The
process for awarding leases noncompetitively outlined in these two
sections is currently inconsistent.
As currently written, Sec. 285.231 allows the award of a
noncompetitive lease after BOEMRE receives an unsolicited request for a
noncompetitive lease, provided that BOEMRE determines that there is no
competitive interest after publishing a single notice of a request for
interest relating to the unsolicited request for a noncompetitive
lease.
As currently written, Sec. 285.232 provides that, after BOEMRE
publishes an RFI or Call, if a respondent indicates interest in leasing
an area for which no other party has indicated interest, BOEMRE may
offer a lease through a noncompetitive process. However, the
regulations require the publication of a second RFI notice to confirm
the absence of competition before proceeding with the noncompetitive
process. We believe that this requirement for a second notice is
redundant and is at odds with the noncompetitive process prescribed for
cases in which a party submits an unsolicited request for an OCS
renewable energy lease, where BOEMRE is required to publish only a
single notice. Eliminating this discrepancy and requiring only one RFI
notice would make BOEMRE's leasing processes more streamlined and
efficient while maintaining BOEMRE's obligation to
[[Page 8963]]
notify the public of areas that may be leased, solicit public input
regarding those areas, and determine whether competitive interest
exists in acquiring such leases in the proposed area(s).
Accordingly, BOEMRE proposes to revise Sec. 285.231(d)(1) to state
that we will publish in the Federal Register a notice that there is no
competitive interest. We would also revise Sec. 285.232(c) to refer
back to Sec. 285.231(d) through (i) instead of referring back to Sec.
285.231(b) through (i).
Comments on the Direct Final Rulemaking
BOEMRE received a total of eight comments in response to the direct
final rulemaking published on November 26, 2010. All of the comments
objected to the rulemaking, characterizing its effect as improper
rushing by BOEMRE to allow offshore renewable energy leasing and
development. Four comments took issue specifically with the direct
final rulemaking process itself and called for a proposed rule and
comment procedure. Five of the comments stated that the current wording
of 30 CFR 285.231 and 232 should be retained. A majority of the
commenters appeared to misunderstand the effect of the proposed
revision, evidencing a belief that it would remove the requirement for
public notice to determine competitive interest altogether. However,
one comment, which appeared to accurately understand the effect of the
rulemaking, recommended retention of the current wording, stating that,
``[t]he current regulations provide an added level of protection by
ensuring that the public has adequate notice of any requests for
interest relating to proposals to construct offshore alternative energy
projects, giving competitive interests the chance to participate and
submit alternative bids and the public an opportunity to express
concerns and make comments.''
BOEMRE has determined that it received significant adverse comment
on the direct final rule, which was defined in the November 26 notice
as ``a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or
approach or would be ineffective and unacceptable without a change.''
It is therefore publishing this proposed rule for public comment.
However, BOEMRE believes that the intent and effect of the proposed
regulatory revision were largely misunderstood by most of the
commenters. This proposed rule would maintain adequate public notice of
leasing proposals and would be sufficient for the purpose of
determining whether competitive interest existed, while eliminating
unnecessary, inconsistent, and inefficient repetition in the renewable
energy leasing process when it is initiated by BOEMRE. BOEMRE will
consider the eight comments already received as they relate to this
proposed rulemaking unless they are withdrawn by the commenters, and
those commenters are welcome to submit additional comments.
Procedural Matters
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)
This proposed rule would not be a significant rule as determined by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and is not subject to review
under E.O. 12866.
(1) This proposed rule would not have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy. It would not adversely affect in a
material way the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.
(2) This proposed rule would not create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.
The proposed rule is intended to eliminate redundancy and inefficiency.
(3) This proposed rule would not alter the budgetary effects of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or
obligations of their recipients.
(4) This proposed rule would not raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the
principles set forth in E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). The Department prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis for 30
CFR part 285, and concluded that the regulations will impact a
substantial number of small entities, but will not have a significant
economic impact on the small entities in comparison to the impacts on
large entities. That analysis was discussed in detail in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking for 30 CFR part 285 published in the Federal
Register on July 9, 2008 (73 FR 39376).
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for
the industries affected by this rule is 221119 (Other Electric Power
Generation). The definition for this code is:
``This U.S. industry comprises establishments primarily engaged
in operating electric power generation facilities (except
hydroelectric, fossil fuel, nuclear). These facilities convert other
forms of energy, such as solar, wind, or tidal power, into
electrical energy. The electric energy produced in these
establishments is provided to electric power transmission systems or
to electric power distribution systems.''
It is possible that this proposed rule could eventually affect
entities that produce hydrogen and fall under NAICS Code 325120
(Industrial Gas Manufacturing). The definition for this code is:
``This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in
manufacturing industrial organic and inorganic gases in compressed,
liquid, or solid forms.''
Given the original findings of the regulatory flexibility analysis
done for 30 CFR part 285, as well as the minor adjustment to the
renewable energy leasing process that is contemplated, the proposed
rule would not have a significant effect on a substantial number of
small entities.
Your comments are important. The Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were
established to receive comments from small businesses about Federal
agency enforcement actions. The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the
enforcement activities and rate each Agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on the actions of BOEMRE, call 1-888-
734-3247. You may comment to the Small Business Administration without
fear of retaliation. Allegations of discrimination/retaliation filed
with the Small Business Administration will be investigated for
appropriate action.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed rule is not a major rule under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). This
proposed rule:
a. Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
b. Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
[[Page 8964]]
The requirements would apply indiscriminately to entities intending to
acquire a renewable energy lease on the OCS pursuant to 30 CFR part
285.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule would not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The proposed rule would not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) is not required.
Takings Implication Assessment (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in E.O. 12630, this proposed rule does not have
significant takings implications. The proposed rule is not a
governmental action capable of interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. A Takings Implication Assessment is not
required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, this proposed rule does not have
federalism implications. This proposed rule would not substantially and
directly affect the relationship between the Federal and State
Governments. To the extent that State and local governments have a role
in OCS activities, this proposed rule would not affect that role. A
Federalism Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This proposed rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this proposed rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
Under the criteria in E.O. 13175, we have evaluated this proposed
rule and determined that it has no substantial effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This proposed rulemaking contains no new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements; therefore, an OMB submission under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required. The PRA provides that an agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. Until OMB approves a collection of
information and assigns a control number, you are not required to
respond. The revisions in this rulemaking refer to, but would not
change, information collection requirements in 30 CFR part 285. The OMB
approved the referenced information collection requirements under OMB
Control Number 1010-0176 (expiration 3/31/2013).
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
This proposed rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. BOEMRE
has analyzed this proposed rule under the criteria of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Department's regulations
implementing NEPA. This proposed rule meets the criteria set forth at
43 CFR 46.210(i) for a Departmental Categorical Exclusion in that this
proposed rule is ``* * * of an administrative, financial, legal,
technical, or procedural nature; or whose environmental effects are too
broad, speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful
analysis * * *'' Further, BOEMRE has analyzed this proposed rule to
determine if it meets any of the extraordinary circumstances that would
require an environmental assessment or an environmental impact
statement as set forth in 43 CFR 46.215 and concluded that this
proposed rule, being purely procedural, does not meet any of the
criteria for extraordinary circumstances.
Data Quality Act
In developing this proposed rule, BOEMRE did not conduct or use a
study, experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data
Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554, app. C Sec. 515, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-
153-154).
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant energy action under the
definition in E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Clarity of This Proposed Regulation
BOEMRE is required by E.O. 12866, E.O. 12988, and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the proposed rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of
the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or
sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables
would be useful, etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 285
Continental shelf, Environmental protection, Public lands.
Dated: February 9, 2011.
Wilma A. Lewis,
Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) proposes to amend 30
CFR part 285 as follows:
PART 285--RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ALTERNATE USES OF EXISTING
FACILITIES ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for part 285 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1337.
2. Amend Sec. 285.231 by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 285.231 How will BOEMRE process my unsolicited request for a
noncompetitive lease?
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) We will publish in the Federal Register a notice that there is
no competitive interest; and
* * * * *
3. Amend Sec. 285.232 by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
[[Page 8965]]
Sec. 285.232 May I acquire a lease noncompetitively after responding
to a Request for Interest or Call for Information and Nominations under
Sec. 285.213?
* * * * *
(c) After receiving the acquisition fee, BOEMRE will follow the
process outlined in Sec. 285.231(d) through (i).
[FR Doc. 2011-3515 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P