Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties, 9020-9022 [2011-3476]
Download as PDF
9020
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Disease, Disability, and Injury
Prevention and Control; Special
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Ability of
Individual and Integrated Tick
Management (ITM) Technologies To
Reduce the Entomological Risk of
Lyme Disease, Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA) CK11–005, Initial
Review
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
announces the aforementioned meeting:
Time and Date: 12 p.m.–2 p.m., May
10, 2011 (Closed).
Place: Teleconference.
Status: The meeting will be closed to
the public in accordance with
provisions set forth in Section
552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and
the Determination of the Director,
Management Analysis and Services
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92–
463.
Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting
will include the initial review,
discussion, and evaluation of
applications received in response to
‘‘Ability of Individual and Integrated
Tick Management (ITM) Technologies
To Reduce the Entomological Risk of
Lyme Disease, FOA CK11–005.’’
Contact Person for More Information:
Amy Yang, PhD, Scientific Review
Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE.,
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,
Telephone: (404) 498–2733.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities, for both the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
Dated: February 4, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011–3531 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
Title: DRA TANF Final Rule.
OMB No.: 0970–0338.
Description: When the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA)
reauthorized the Temporary Assistance
for Needy Families (TANF) program, it
imposed a new data requirement that
States prepare and submit data
verification procedures and replaced
other data requirements with new
versions including: the TANF Data
Report, the SSP–MOE Data Report, the
Caseload Reduction Documentation
Process, and the Reasonable Cause/
Corrective Compliance Documentation
Process. The Claims Resolution Act of
2010 extended the TANF program
through September 2011. We are
proposing to continue these information
collections without change.
Respondents: 54.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Instrument or requirement
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Preparation and Submission of Data Verification Procedures—§§ 261.60–
261.63 ..........................................................................................................
Caseload Reduction Documentation Process, ACF–202—§§ 261.41 &
261.44 ..........................................................................................................
Reasonable Cause/Corrective Compliance Documentation Process—
§§ 262.4, 262.6, & 262.7; § 261.51 ..............................................................
TANF Data Report—Part 265 .........................................................................
SSP–MOE Data Report—Part 265 ..................................................................
Total Burden Hours: 625,200.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370
L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance
Officer. E-mail address:
infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests
should be identified by the title of the
information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Average
burden hours
per response
Yearly
submittals
Final rule total
annual burden
hours
54
1
640
34,560
54
1
120
6,480
54
54
29
2
4
4
240
2,201
714
25,920
475,416
82,824
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2011–3415 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2004–N–0390] (formerly
Docket No. 2004N–0503)
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Guidance on
Consultation Procedures: Foods
Derived From New Plant Varieties
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
9021
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by March 18,
2011.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–New and
title ‘‘Guidance on Consultation
Procedures: Foods Derived From New
Plant Varieties.’’ Also include the FDA
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
3793.
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Guidance on Consultation Procedures:
Foods Derived From New Plant
Varieties—(OMB Control Number
0910–NEW)
I. Background
Since 1992, when FDA issued its
Statement of Policy: Foods Derived
From New Plant Varieties (the 1992
policy) (57 FR 22984, May 29, 1992),
FDA has encouraged developers of new
plant varieties, including those varieties
that are developed through
biotechnology, to consult with FDA
during the plant development process to
discuss possible scientific and
regulatory issues that might arise. In the
1992 policy, FDA explained that, under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act), developers of new
foods (in this document food refers to
both human food and animal feed) have
a responsibility to ensure that the foods
they offer to consumers are safe and are
in compliance with all requirements of
the FD&C Act (57 FR 22984 at 22985).
FDA has long regarded it to be a
prudent practice for producers who use
biotechnology in the manufacture or
development of foods and food
ingredients to work cooperatively with
FDA to ensure that products derived
through biotechnology are safe and
comply with all applicable legal
requirements. Consequently, FDA
instituted a voluntary consultation
process with industry. The guidance on
Consultation Procedures: From New
Plant Varieties (originally published in
1996 and revised October 1997; the
updated version is available on FDA’s
Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
FoodGuidances) fosters communication
by encouraging developers to submit to
FDA their evaluation of the food safety
of their new plant variety. Such
communication will help to ensure that
any potential food safety issues
regarding a new plant variety are
resolved during development, and will
help to ensure that all market entry
decisions by the industry are made
consistently and in full compliance with
the standards of the FD&C Act.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents to this collection of
information include developers of new
plant varieties intended for food use.
In the Federal Register of February
18, 2010 (75 FR 7274), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. FDA received one letter,
containing multiple comments, in
response to the notice. One comment
expressed strong support for the
consultation procedures, generally.
(Comment 1) One comment noted
with appreciation that Form FDA 3665
will provide a standardized format and
an ability to provide electronic
information.
(Response) FDA agrees. As discussed
elsewhere in this document, the new
form will prompt developers to submit
to FDA certain information in a
standard format. In addition, the form
and attachments can be submitted in an
electronic format. FDA believes that use
of the form and electronic submission
will facilitate both the preparation and
review of the submission because it
organizes the information necessary to
support the safety of the food derived
from the new plant variety. FDA also
expects that use of the form will
decrease the overall paperwork burden
on respondents.
(Comment 2) Another comment noted
that the use of the new form and
electronic submission of data and
information for FDA’s use should assure
the protection of proprietary data and
information submitted to FDA.
(Response) The submission to FDA
may contain trade secret and
commercial confidential information.
Only information that is releasable
under 21 CFR part 20 would be released
to the public. This information is also
safeguarded by section 301(j) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 331(j)) and would
be protected from disclosure under
sections 552(a) and (b) of the Freedom
of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
(b)).
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Annual
frequency per
response
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Activity
FDA Form No.
Initial consultation ...............
Final consultation ................
None ...................................
FDA 3665 ...........................
20
12
2
1
40
12
4
150
160
1,800
Total .............................
.............................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
1,960
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
1 There
Total hours
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
II. Initial Consultations
Initial consultations are generally a
one-time burden, although a developer
might return more than once to discuss
additional issues before submitting a
final consultation. As noted in its
guidance to industry, FDA encourages
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
developers to consult early in the
development phase of their products,
and as often as necessary. Historically,
firms developing a new bioengineered
plant variety intended for food use have
generally initiated consultation with
FDA early in the process of developing
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
such a variety, even though there is no
legal obligation for such consultation.
These consultations have served to
make FDA aware of foods and food
ingredients before these products are
distributed commercially, and have
provided FDA with the information
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
9022
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
necessary to address any potential
questions regarding the safety, labeling,
or regulatory status of the food or food
ingredient. As such, these consultations
have provided assistance to both
industry and the Agency in exercising
their mutual responsibilities under the
FD&C Act.
Generally, for an initial consultation,
a developer requests a meeting by
sending FDA a letter with an agenda. A
mutually convenient time is arranged
and the developer comes to discuss
their product. In preparation for a
meeting, a developer might prepare
written materials or a slide presentation
to discuss their product under
development. A meeting between the
developer and FDA typically lasts
between 1 and 2 hours. As a result of
such a meeting, FDA establishes a file
called a biotechnology notification file,
or BNF, to collect all documentation
and communication regarding the
bioengineered plant. For example, FDA
typically places information such as the
developer’s letter, agenda, and any
written materials (such as copies of a
slide presentation) in a BNF, as well as
any memorandum FDA prepares as a
record of the meeting. FDA has not
issued any recommendations as to the
format for these types of materials (e.g.,
there is no form associated with
requesting a meeting).
Depending on the introduced trait, the
experience the developer has had with
the kind of modification being
considered, and their familiarity with
the consultation procedures, a
developer might choose to do a final
consultation without an initial
consultation.
III. Final Consultations
Final consultations are a one-time
burden. At some stage in the process of
research and development, a developer
will have accumulated the information
that the developer believes is adequate
to ensure that food derived from the
new plant variety is safe and that it
demonstrates compliance with the
relevant provisions of the FD&C Act.
The developer will then be in a position
to conclude any ongoing consultation
with FDA. The developer submits to
FDA a summary of the safety and
nutritional assessment that has been
conducted about the bioengineered food
that is intended to be introduced into
commercial distribution. FDA evaluates
the submission to ensure that all
potential safety and regulatory questions
have been addressed. FDA has recently
developed a form that prompts a
developer to include certain elements in
the final consultation in a standard
format. New Form FDA 3665 is entitled
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:10 Feb 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
‘‘Final Consultation for Food Derived
From a New Plant Variety
(Biotechnology Final Consultation).’’
The form, and elements that would be
prepared as attachments to the form, can
be submitted in electronic format.
The summary information of the
safety and nutritional assessment for a
new plant variety submitted to FDA (on
the form and in attachments to the form)
includes the following information:
• The name of the bioengineered food
and the crop from which it is derived;
• A description of the various
applications or uses of the
bioengineered food, including animal
feed uses;
• Information concerning the sources,
identities, and functions of introduced
genetic material;
• Information on the purpose or
intended technical effect of the
modification, and its expected effect on
the composition or characteristic
properties of the food or feed;
• Information concerning the identity
and function of expression products
encoded by the introduced genetic
material, including an estimate of the
concentration of any expression product
in the bioengineered crop or food
derived therefrom;
• Information regarding any known or
suspected allergenicity and toxicity of
expression products and the basis for
concluding that foods containing the
expression products can be safely
consumed;
• Information comparing the
composition or characteristics of the
bioengineered food to that of food
derived from the parental variety or
other commonly consumed varieties of
the same crop with special emphasis on
important nutrients, and toxicants that
occur naturally in the food;
• A discussion of the available
information that addresses whether the
potential for the food derived from a
bioengineered plant to induce an
allergic response has been altered by the
genetic modification; and
• Any other information relevant to
the safety and nutritional assessment of
the bioengineered food.
In 2001, FDA contacted 5 firms that
had made one or more biotechnology
consultation submissions under the
1996 procedures. FDA asked each of
these firms for an estimate of the hourly
burden to prepare a submission under
the voluntary biotechnology
consultation process. Three of these
firms subsequently provided the
requested information. Based on this
information, FDA estimated that the
average time to prepare a submission for
final consultation under the 1996
procedures is 150 hours (69 FR 68381,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
November 24, 2004). The availability of
the form, and the opportunity to provide
the information in electronic format,
could reduce this estimate. However, as
a conservative approach for the purpose
of this analysis, FDA is assuming that
the availability of the form and the
opportunity to submit the information
in electronic format will have no effect
on the average time to prepare a
submission for final consultation under
the 1996 procedures.
Dated: February 11, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–3476 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0248]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Announcement of Office of
Management and Budget Approval;
Format and Content Requirements for
Over-the-Counter Drug Product
Labeling
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a collection of information entitled
‘‘Format and Content Requirements for
Over-the-Counter Drug Product
Labeling’’ has been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and
Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–
796–3792,
Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of August 13, 2010 (75
FR 49495), the Agency announced that
the proposed information collection had
been submitted to OMB for review and
clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned
OMB control number 0910–0340. The
approval expires on January 31, 2014. A
copy of the supporting statement for this
information collection is available on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9020-9022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3476]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2004-N-0390] (formerly Docket No. 2004N-0503)
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance on
Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
[[Page 9021]]
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by March
18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-New and
title ``Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New
Plant Varieties.'' Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant
Varieties--(OMB Control Number 0910-NEW)
I. Background
Since 1992, when FDA issued its Statement of Policy: Foods Derived
From New Plant Varieties (the 1992 policy) (57 FR 22984, May 29, 1992),
FDA has encouraged developers of new plant varieties, including those
varieties that are developed through biotechnology, to consult with FDA
during the plant development process to discuss possible scientific and
regulatory issues that might arise. In the 1992 policy, FDA explained
that, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act),
developers of new foods (in this document food refers to both human
food and animal feed) have a responsibility to ensure that the foods
they offer to consumers are safe and are in compliance with all
requirements of the FD&C Act (57 FR 22984 at 22985).
FDA has long regarded it to be a prudent practice for producers who
use biotechnology in the manufacture or development of foods and food
ingredients to work cooperatively with FDA to ensure that products
derived through biotechnology are safe and comply with all applicable
legal requirements. Consequently, FDA instituted a voluntary
consultation process with industry. The guidance on Consultation
Procedures: From New Plant Varieties (originally published in 1996 and
revised October 1997; the updated version is available on FDA's Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances) fosters communication by
encouraging developers to submit to FDA their evaluation of the food
safety of their new plant variety. Such communication will help to
ensure that any potential food safety issues regarding a new plant
variety are resolved during development, and will help to ensure that
all market entry decisions by the industry are made consistently and in
full compliance with the standards of the FD&C Act.
Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection of
information include developers of new plant varieties intended for food
use.
In the Federal Register of February 18, 2010 (75 FR 7274), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. FDA received one letter, containing multiple
comments, in response to the notice. One comment expressed strong
support for the consultation procedures, generally.
(Comment 1) One comment noted with appreciation that Form FDA 3665
will provide a standardized format and an ability to provide electronic
information.
(Response) FDA agrees. As discussed elsewhere in this document, the
new form will prompt developers to submit to FDA certain information in
a standard format. In addition, the form and attachments can be
submitted in an electronic format. FDA believes that use of the form
and electronic submission will facilitate both the preparation and
review of the submission because it organizes the information necessary
to support the safety of the food derived from the new plant variety.
FDA also expects that use of the form will decrease the overall
paperwork burden on respondents.
(Comment 2) Another comment noted that the use of the new form and
electronic submission of data and information for FDA's use should
assure the protection of proprietary data and information submitted to
FDA.
(Response) The submission to FDA may contain trade secret and
commercial confidential information. Only information that is
releasable under 21 CFR part 20 would be released to the public. This
information is also safeguarded by section 301(j) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 331(j)) and would be protected from disclosure under sections
552(a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
(b)).
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Activity FDA Form No. Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
respondents response responses response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial consultation...................... None........................ 20 2 40 4 160
Final consultation........................ FDA 3665.................... 12 1 12 150 1,800
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................. ............................ .............. .............. .............. .............. 1,960
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
II. Initial Consultations
Initial consultations are generally a one-time burden, although a
developer might return more than once to discuss additional issues
before submitting a final consultation. As noted in its guidance to
industry, FDA encourages developers to consult early in the development
phase of their products, and as often as necessary. Historically, firms
developing a new bioengineered plant variety intended for food use have
generally initiated consultation with FDA early in the process of
developing such a variety, even though there is no legal obligation for
such consultation. These consultations have served to make FDA aware of
foods and food ingredients before these products are distributed
commercially, and have provided FDA with the information
[[Page 9022]]
necessary to address any potential questions regarding the safety,
labeling, or regulatory status of the food or food ingredient. As such,
these consultations have provided assistance to both industry and the
Agency in exercising their mutual responsibilities under the FD&C Act.
Generally, for an initial consultation, a developer requests a
meeting by sending FDA a letter with an agenda. A mutually convenient
time is arranged and the developer comes to discuss their product. In
preparation for a meeting, a developer might prepare written materials
or a slide presentation to discuss their product under development. A
meeting between the developer and FDA typically lasts between 1 and 2
hours. As a result of such a meeting, FDA establishes a file called a
biotechnology notification file, or BNF, to collect all documentation
and communication regarding the bioengineered plant. For example, FDA
typically places information such as the developer's letter, agenda,
and any written materials (such as copies of a slide presentation) in a
BNF, as well as any memorandum FDA prepares as a record of the meeting.
FDA has not issued any recommendations as to the format for these types
of materials (e.g., there is no form associated with requesting a
meeting).
Depending on the introduced trait, the experience the developer has
had with the kind of modification being considered, and their
familiarity with the consultation procedures, a developer might choose
to do a final consultation without an initial consultation.
III. Final Consultations
Final consultations are a one-time burden. At some stage in the
process of research and development, a developer will have accumulated
the information that the developer believes is adequate to ensure that
food derived from the new plant variety is safe and that it
demonstrates compliance with the relevant provisions of the FD&C Act.
The developer will then be in a position to conclude any ongoing
consultation with FDA. The developer submits to FDA a summary of the
safety and nutritional assessment that has been conducted about the
bioengineered food that is intended to be introduced into commercial
distribution. FDA evaluates the submission to ensure that all potential
safety and regulatory questions have been addressed. FDA has recently
developed a form that prompts a developer to include certain elements
in the final consultation in a standard format. New Form FDA 3665 is
entitled ``Final Consultation for Food Derived From a New Plant Variety
(Biotechnology Final Consultation).'' The form, and elements that would
be prepared as attachments to the form, can be submitted in electronic
format.
The summary information of the safety and nutritional assessment
for a new plant variety submitted to FDA (on the form and in
attachments to the form) includes the following information:
The name of the bioengineered food and the crop from which
it is derived;
A description of the various applications or uses of the
bioengineered food, including animal feed uses;
Information concerning the sources, identities, and
functions of introduced genetic material;
Information on the purpose or intended technical effect of
the modification, and its expected effect on the composition or
characteristic properties of the food or feed;
Information concerning the identity and function of
expression products encoded by the introduced genetic material,
including an estimate of the concentration of any expression product in
the bioengineered crop or food derived therefrom;
Information regarding any known or suspected allergenicity
and toxicity of expression products and the basis for concluding that
foods containing the expression products can be safely consumed;
Information comparing the composition or characteristics
of the bioengineered food to that of food derived from the parental
variety or other commonly consumed varieties of the same crop with
special emphasis on important nutrients, and toxicants that occur
naturally in the food;
A discussion of the available information that addresses
whether the potential for the food derived from a bioengineered plant
to induce an allergic response has been altered by the genetic
modification; and
Any other information relevant to the safety and
nutritional assessment of the bioengineered food.
In 2001, FDA contacted 5 firms that had made one or more
biotechnology consultation submissions under the 1996 procedures. FDA
asked each of these firms for an estimate of the hourly burden to
prepare a submission under the voluntary biotechnology consultation
process. Three of these firms subsequently provided the requested
information. Based on this information, FDA estimated that the average
time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the 1996
procedures is 150 hours (69 FR 68381, November 24, 2004). The
availability of the form, and the opportunity to provide the
information in electronic format, could reduce this estimate. However,
as a conservative approach for the purpose of this analysis, FDA is
assuming that the availability of the form and the opportunity to
submit the information in electronic format will have no effect on the
average time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the
1996 procedures.
Dated: February 11, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-3476 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P