Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties, 9020-9022 [2011-3476]

Download as PDF 9020 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control; Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Ability of Individual and Integrated Tick Management (ITM) Technologies To Reduce the Entomological Risk of Lyme Disease, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CK11–005, Initial Review In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting: Time and Date: 12 p.m.–2 p.m., May 10, 2011 (Closed). Place: Teleconference. Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92– 463. Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to ‘‘Ability of Individual and Integrated Tick Management (ITM) Technologies To Reduce the Entomological Risk of Lyme Disease, FOA CK11–005.’’ Contact Person for More Information: Amy Yang, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498–2733. The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Dated: February 4, 2011. Elaine L. Baker, Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2011–3531 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request Proposed Projects: Title: DRA TANF Final Rule. OMB No.: 0970–0338. Description: When the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) reauthorized the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, it imposed a new data requirement that States prepare and submit data verification procedures and replaced other data requirements with new versions including: the TANF Data Report, the SSP–MOE Data Report, the Caseload Reduction Documentation Process, and the Reasonable Cause/ Corrective Compliance Documentation Process. The Claims Resolution Act of 2010 extended the TANF program through September 2011. We are proposing to continue these information collections without change. Respondents: 54. ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES Number of respondents Instrument or requirement mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Preparation and Submission of Data Verification Procedures—§§ 261.60– 261.63 .......................................................................................................... Caseload Reduction Documentation Process, ACF–202—§§ 261.41 & 261.44 .......................................................................................................... Reasonable Cause/Corrective Compliance Documentation Process— §§ 262.4, 262.6, & 262.7; § 261.51 .............................................................. TANF Data Report—Part 265 ......................................................................... SSP–MOE Data Report—Part 265 .................................................................. Total Burden Hours: 625,200. In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. E-mail address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the proposed VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 Average burden hours per response Yearly submittals Final rule total annual burden hours 54 1 640 34,560 54 1 120 6,480 54 54 29 2 4 4 240 2,201 714 25,920 475,416 82,824 collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer. SUMMARY: [FR Doc. 2011–3415 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2004–N–0390] (formerly Docket No. 2004N–0503) Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 9021 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by March 18, 2011. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910–New and title ‘‘Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties.’’ Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50– 400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796– 3793. In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties—(OMB Control Number 0910–NEW) I. Background Since 1992, when FDA issued its Statement of Policy: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties (the 1992 policy) (57 FR 22984, May 29, 1992), FDA has encouraged developers of new plant varieties, including those varieties that are developed through biotechnology, to consult with FDA during the plant development process to discuss possible scientific and regulatory issues that might arise. In the 1992 policy, FDA explained that, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), developers of new foods (in this document food refers to both human food and animal feed) have a responsibility to ensure that the foods they offer to consumers are safe and are in compliance with all requirements of the FD&C Act (57 FR 22984 at 22985). FDA has long regarded it to be a prudent practice for producers who use biotechnology in the manufacture or development of foods and food ingredients to work cooperatively with FDA to ensure that products derived through biotechnology are safe and comply with all applicable legal requirements. Consequently, FDA instituted a voluntary consultation process with industry. The guidance on Consultation Procedures: From New Plant Varieties (originally published in 1996 and revised October 1997; the updated version is available on FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ FoodGuidances) fosters communication by encouraging developers to submit to FDA their evaluation of the food safety of their new plant variety. Such communication will help to ensure that any potential food safety issues regarding a new plant variety are resolved during development, and will help to ensure that all market entry decisions by the industry are made consistently and in full compliance with the standards of the FD&C Act. Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection of information include developers of new plant varieties intended for food use. In the Federal Register of February 18, 2010 (75 FR 7274), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. FDA received one letter, containing multiple comments, in response to the notice. One comment expressed strong support for the consultation procedures, generally. (Comment 1) One comment noted with appreciation that Form FDA 3665 will provide a standardized format and an ability to provide electronic information. (Response) FDA agrees. As discussed elsewhere in this document, the new form will prompt developers to submit to FDA certain information in a standard format. In addition, the form and attachments can be submitted in an electronic format. FDA believes that use of the form and electronic submission will facilitate both the preparation and review of the submission because it organizes the information necessary to support the safety of the food derived from the new plant variety. FDA also expects that use of the form will decrease the overall paperwork burden on respondents. (Comment 2) Another comment noted that the use of the new form and electronic submission of data and information for FDA’s use should assure the protection of proprietary data and information submitted to FDA. (Response) The submission to FDA may contain trade secret and commercial confidential information. Only information that is releasable under 21 CFR part 20 would be released to the public. This information is also safeguarded by section 301(j) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 331(j)) and would be protected from disclosure under sections 552(a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and (b)). FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1 Number of respondents Annual frequency per response Total annual responses Hours per response Activity FDA Form No. Initial consultation ............... Final consultation ................ None ................................... FDA 3665 ........................... 20 12 2 1 40 12 4 150 160 1,800 Total ............................. ............................................. ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,960 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 1 There Total hours are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. II. Initial Consultations Initial consultations are generally a one-time burden, although a developer might return more than once to discuss additional issues before submitting a final consultation. As noted in its guidance to industry, FDA encourages VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 developers to consult early in the development phase of their products, and as often as necessary. Historically, firms developing a new bioengineered plant variety intended for food use have generally initiated consultation with FDA early in the process of developing PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 such a variety, even though there is no legal obligation for such consultation. These consultations have served to make FDA aware of foods and food ingredients before these products are distributed commercially, and have provided FDA with the information E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1 9022 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 16, 2011 / Notices mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES necessary to address any potential questions regarding the safety, labeling, or regulatory status of the food or food ingredient. As such, these consultations have provided assistance to both industry and the Agency in exercising their mutual responsibilities under the FD&C Act. Generally, for an initial consultation, a developer requests a meeting by sending FDA a letter with an agenda. A mutually convenient time is arranged and the developer comes to discuss their product. In preparation for a meeting, a developer might prepare written materials or a slide presentation to discuss their product under development. A meeting between the developer and FDA typically lasts between 1 and 2 hours. As a result of such a meeting, FDA establishes a file called a biotechnology notification file, or BNF, to collect all documentation and communication regarding the bioengineered plant. For example, FDA typically places information such as the developer’s letter, agenda, and any written materials (such as copies of a slide presentation) in a BNF, as well as any memorandum FDA prepares as a record of the meeting. FDA has not issued any recommendations as to the format for these types of materials (e.g., there is no form associated with requesting a meeting). Depending on the introduced trait, the experience the developer has had with the kind of modification being considered, and their familiarity with the consultation procedures, a developer might choose to do a final consultation without an initial consultation. III. Final Consultations Final consultations are a one-time burden. At some stage in the process of research and development, a developer will have accumulated the information that the developer believes is adequate to ensure that food derived from the new plant variety is safe and that it demonstrates compliance with the relevant provisions of the FD&C Act. The developer will then be in a position to conclude any ongoing consultation with FDA. The developer submits to FDA a summary of the safety and nutritional assessment that has been conducted about the bioengineered food that is intended to be introduced into commercial distribution. FDA evaluates the submission to ensure that all potential safety and regulatory questions have been addressed. FDA has recently developed a form that prompts a developer to include certain elements in the final consultation in a standard format. New Form FDA 3665 is entitled VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:10 Feb 15, 2011 Jkt 223001 ‘‘Final Consultation for Food Derived From a New Plant Variety (Biotechnology Final Consultation).’’ The form, and elements that would be prepared as attachments to the form, can be submitted in electronic format. The summary information of the safety and nutritional assessment for a new plant variety submitted to FDA (on the form and in attachments to the form) includes the following information: • The name of the bioengineered food and the crop from which it is derived; • A description of the various applications or uses of the bioengineered food, including animal feed uses; • Information concerning the sources, identities, and functions of introduced genetic material; • Information on the purpose or intended technical effect of the modification, and its expected effect on the composition or characteristic properties of the food or feed; • Information concerning the identity and function of expression products encoded by the introduced genetic material, including an estimate of the concentration of any expression product in the bioengineered crop or food derived therefrom; • Information regarding any known or suspected allergenicity and toxicity of expression products and the basis for concluding that foods containing the expression products can be safely consumed; • Information comparing the composition or characteristics of the bioengineered food to that of food derived from the parental variety or other commonly consumed varieties of the same crop with special emphasis on important nutrients, and toxicants that occur naturally in the food; • A discussion of the available information that addresses whether the potential for the food derived from a bioengineered plant to induce an allergic response has been altered by the genetic modification; and • Any other information relevant to the safety and nutritional assessment of the bioengineered food. In 2001, FDA contacted 5 firms that had made one or more biotechnology consultation submissions under the 1996 procedures. FDA asked each of these firms for an estimate of the hourly burden to prepare a submission under the voluntary biotechnology consultation process. Three of these firms subsequently provided the requested information. Based on this information, FDA estimated that the average time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the 1996 procedures is 150 hours (69 FR 68381, PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 November 24, 2004). The availability of the form, and the opportunity to provide the information in electronic format, could reduce this estimate. However, as a conservative approach for the purpose of this analysis, FDA is assuming that the availability of the form and the opportunity to submit the information in electronic format will have no effect on the average time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the 1996 procedures. Dated: February 11, 2011. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–3476 Filed 2–15–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0248] Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office of Management and Budget Approval; Format and Content Requirements for Over-the-Counter Drug Product Labeling AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled ‘‘Format and Content Requirements for Over-the-Counter Drug Product Labeling’’ has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301– 796–3792, Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 13, 2010 (75 FR 49495), the Agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910–0340. The approval expires on January 31, 2014. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9020-9022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2004-N-0390] (formerly Docket No. 2004N-0503)


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance on 
Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the

[[Page 9021]]

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by March 
18, 2011.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, 
FAX: 202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All 
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-New and 
title ``Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New 
Plant Varieties.'' Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets 
in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance.

Guidance on Consultation Procedures: Foods Derived From New Plant 
Varieties--(OMB Control Number 0910-NEW)

I. Background

    Since 1992, when FDA issued its Statement of Policy: Foods Derived 
From New Plant Varieties (the 1992 policy) (57 FR 22984, May 29, 1992), 
FDA has encouraged developers of new plant varieties, including those 
varieties that are developed through biotechnology, to consult with FDA 
during the plant development process to discuss possible scientific and 
regulatory issues that might arise. In the 1992 policy, FDA explained 
that, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), 
developers of new foods (in this document food refers to both human 
food and animal feed) have a responsibility to ensure that the foods 
they offer to consumers are safe and are in compliance with all 
requirements of the FD&C Act (57 FR 22984 at 22985).
    FDA has long regarded it to be a prudent practice for producers who 
use biotechnology in the manufacture or development of foods and food 
ingredients to work cooperatively with FDA to ensure that products 
derived through biotechnology are safe and comply with all applicable 
legal requirements. Consequently, FDA instituted a voluntary 
consultation process with industry. The guidance on Consultation 
Procedures: From New Plant Varieties (originally published in 1996 and 
revised October 1997; the updated version is available on FDA's Web 
site at https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances) fosters communication by 
encouraging developers to submit to FDA their evaluation of the food 
safety of their new plant variety. Such communication will help to 
ensure that any potential food safety issues regarding a new plant 
variety are resolved during development, and will help to ensure that 
all market entry decisions by the industry are made consistently and in 
full compliance with the standards of the FD&C Act.
    Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection of 
information include developers of new plant varieties intended for food 
use.
    In the Federal Register of February 18, 2010 (75 FR 7274), FDA 
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed 
collection of information. FDA received one letter, containing multiple 
comments, in response to the notice. One comment expressed strong 
support for the consultation procedures, generally.
    (Comment 1) One comment noted with appreciation that Form FDA 3665 
will provide a standardized format and an ability to provide electronic 
information.
    (Response) FDA agrees. As discussed elsewhere in this document, the 
new form will prompt developers to submit to FDA certain information in 
a standard format. In addition, the form and attachments can be 
submitted in an electronic format. FDA believes that use of the form 
and electronic submission will facilitate both the preparation and 
review of the submission because it organizes the information necessary 
to support the safety of the food derived from the new plant variety. 
FDA also expects that use of the form will decrease the overall 
paperwork burden on respondents.
    (Comment 2) Another comment noted that the use of the new form and 
electronic submission of data and information for FDA's use should 
assure the protection of proprietary data and information submitted to 
FDA.
    (Response) The submission to FDA may contain trade secret and 
commercial confidential information. Only information that is 
releasable under 21 CFR part 20 would be released to the public. This 
information is also safeguarded by section 301(j) of the FD&C Act (21 
U.S.C. 331(j)) and would be protected from disclosure under sections 
552(a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 
(b)).
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                              Annual
                 Activity                           FDA Form No.             Number of     frequency per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                                                            respondents      response        responses       response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial consultation......................  None........................              20               2              40               4             160
Final consultation........................  FDA 3665....................              12               1              12             150           1,800
                                           -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.................................  ............................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           1,960
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
 

II. Initial Consultations

    Initial consultations are generally a one-time burden, although a 
developer might return more than once to discuss additional issues 
before submitting a final consultation. As noted in its guidance to 
industry, FDA encourages developers to consult early in the development 
phase of their products, and as often as necessary. Historically, firms 
developing a new bioengineered plant variety intended for food use have 
generally initiated consultation with FDA early in the process of 
developing such a variety, even though there is no legal obligation for 
such consultation. These consultations have served to make FDA aware of 
foods and food ingredients before these products are distributed 
commercially, and have provided FDA with the information

[[Page 9022]]

necessary to address any potential questions regarding the safety, 
labeling, or regulatory status of the food or food ingredient. As such, 
these consultations have provided assistance to both industry and the 
Agency in exercising their mutual responsibilities under the FD&C Act.
    Generally, for an initial consultation, a developer requests a 
meeting by sending FDA a letter with an agenda. A mutually convenient 
time is arranged and the developer comes to discuss their product. In 
preparation for a meeting, a developer might prepare written materials 
or a slide presentation to discuss their product under development. A 
meeting between the developer and FDA typically lasts between 1 and 2 
hours. As a result of such a meeting, FDA establishes a file called a 
biotechnology notification file, or BNF, to collect all documentation 
and communication regarding the bioengineered plant. For example, FDA 
typically places information such as the developer's letter, agenda, 
and any written materials (such as copies of a slide presentation) in a 
BNF, as well as any memorandum FDA prepares as a record of the meeting. 
FDA has not issued any recommendations as to the format for these types 
of materials (e.g., there is no form associated with requesting a 
meeting).
    Depending on the introduced trait, the experience the developer has 
had with the kind of modification being considered, and their 
familiarity with the consultation procedures, a developer might choose 
to do a final consultation without an initial consultation.

III. Final Consultations

    Final consultations are a one-time burden. At some stage in the 
process of research and development, a developer will have accumulated 
the information that the developer believes is adequate to ensure that 
food derived from the new plant variety is safe and that it 
demonstrates compliance with the relevant provisions of the FD&C Act. 
The developer will then be in a position to conclude any ongoing 
consultation with FDA. The developer submits to FDA a summary of the 
safety and nutritional assessment that has been conducted about the 
bioengineered food that is intended to be introduced into commercial 
distribution. FDA evaluates the submission to ensure that all potential 
safety and regulatory questions have been addressed. FDA has recently 
developed a form that prompts a developer to include certain elements 
in the final consultation in a standard format. New Form FDA 3665 is 
entitled ``Final Consultation for Food Derived From a New Plant Variety 
(Biotechnology Final Consultation).'' The form, and elements that would 
be prepared as attachments to the form, can be submitted in electronic 
format.
    The summary information of the safety and nutritional assessment 
for a new plant variety submitted to FDA (on the form and in 
attachments to the form) includes the following information:
     The name of the bioengineered food and the crop from which 
it is derived;
     A description of the various applications or uses of the 
bioengineered food, including animal feed uses;
     Information concerning the sources, identities, and 
functions of introduced genetic material;
     Information on the purpose or intended technical effect of 
the modification, and its expected effect on the composition or 
characteristic properties of the food or feed;
     Information concerning the identity and function of 
expression products encoded by the introduced genetic material, 
including an estimate of the concentration of any expression product in 
the bioengineered crop or food derived therefrom;
     Information regarding any known or suspected allergenicity 
and toxicity of expression products and the basis for concluding that 
foods containing the expression products can be safely consumed;
     Information comparing the composition or characteristics 
of the bioengineered food to that of food derived from the parental 
variety or other commonly consumed varieties of the same crop with 
special emphasis on important nutrients, and toxicants that occur 
naturally in the food;
     A discussion of the available information that addresses 
whether the potential for the food derived from a bioengineered plant 
to induce an allergic response has been altered by the genetic 
modification; and
     Any other information relevant to the safety and 
nutritional assessment of the bioengineered food.
    In 2001, FDA contacted 5 firms that had made one or more 
biotechnology consultation submissions under the 1996 procedures. FDA 
asked each of these firms for an estimate of the hourly burden to 
prepare a submission under the voluntary biotechnology consultation 
process. Three of these firms subsequently provided the requested 
information. Based on this information, FDA estimated that the average 
time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the 1996 
procedures is 150 hours (69 FR 68381, November 24, 2004). The 
availability of the form, and the opportunity to provide the 
information in electronic format, could reduce this estimate. However, 
as a conservative approach for the purpose of this analysis, FDA is 
assuming that the availability of the form and the opportunity to 
submit the information in electronic format will have no effect on the 
average time to prepare a submission for final consultation under the 
1996 procedures.

    Dated: February 11, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-3476 Filed 2-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.