Status of Motor Vehicle Budgets in Submitted State Implementation Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes; Connecticut; Notice of Withdrawal of Adequacy of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets, 8736-8737 [2011-3385]
Download as PDF
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
8736
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2011 / Notices
announced today, Policy Assessment for
the Review of the Secondary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur, contains
staff analyses of the scientific bases for
alternative policy options for
consideration by the Agency prior to
rulemaking. This document, which
builds upon the historical ‘‘Staff Paper,’’
will serve to ‘‘bridge the gap’’ between
the available scientific information and
the judgments required of the
Administrator in determining whether it
is appropriate to retain or revise the
standards.2 The current and potential
alternative standards for oxides of
nitrogen and sulfur are considered in
terms of the basic elements of the
NAAQS: indicator, averaging time,
form, and level. The Policy Assessment
builds upon information presented in
the Integrated Science Assessment for
Oxides of Nitrogen and Sulfur—
Ecological Criteria: Final report (ISA,
EPA EPA/600/R–08/082F, December
2008) and the quantitative risk and
exposure assessment document (REA)—
Risk and Exposure Assessment for
Review of the Secondary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur
(EPA–452/R–09–008a and EPA–452/R–
09–008b; September 2009).
A first draft Policy Assessment (EPA–
452/P–10–006) was released in March
2010 to facilitate discussion with the
Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC) at an April 1–2,
2010 meeting on the overall structure,
areas of focus, and level of detail to be
included in the Policy Assessment (75
FR 10479–10481, March 2010).
CASAC’s comments on the first draft
Policy Assessment encouraged the
development of a document focused on
the key policy-relevant issues that
draws from and is not repetitive of
information in the ISA and REA. These
comments were considered in
developing a second draft Policy
Assessment (EPA 452/P–10–008,
September 2010). The EPA presented an
overview of the second draft Policy
Assessment at a CASAC meeting on
October 6–7, 2010 (75 FR 54871–54872).
CASAC (EPA–CASAC–11–003) and
public comments on the second draft
Policy Assessment were considered by
EPA staff in developing both the January
14, 2011 version and this current
version of the final Policy Assessment,
which reflects final editing and
of nitrogen and sulfur are available at: https://
www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/no2so2sec/
index.html.
2 See https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/review.html
for a copy of Administrator Jackson’s May 21, 2009,
memorandum and for additional information on the
NAAQS review process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Feb 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
formatting, and is available through the
Agency’s Technology Transfer Network
(TTN) Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
ttn/naaqs/standards/no2so2sec/
cr_pa.html. CASAC has requested a
February 15–16, 2011, meeting to
review EPA’s final Policy Assessment.
Dated: February 9, 2011.
Mary E. Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2011–3382 Filed 2–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R01–OAR–2008–0117; A–1–FRL–
9267–1]
Status of Motor Vehicle Budgets in
Submitted State Implementation Plan
for Transportation Conformity
Purposes; Connecticut; Notice of
Withdrawal of Adequacy of Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budgets
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of
adequacy.
AGENCY:
EPA is notifying the public
that EPA has withdrawn its previous
adequacy finding on the 2012 motor
vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for
Connecticut’s two 8-hour ozone
nonattainment areas. EPA has
withdrawn the adequacy finding
because Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (CT DEP)
withdrew its 2012 motor vehicle
emission budgets from its eight-hour
ozone attainment demonstration SIP for
both ozone nonattainment areas. As a
result of our finding, Connecticut can
not use these 2012 motor vehicle
emission budgets for future conformity
determinations.
DATES: This finding is effective March 2,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald O. Cooke, Environmental
Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office, Five
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (CAQ),
Boston, MA 02109–3912, (617) 918–
1668, cooke.donald@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Today’s action is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made.
On February 1, 2008, Connecticut
submitted 2008, 2009, and 2012 summer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
day volatile organic compound (VOC)
and nitrogen oxides (NOx) MVEBs for
the Connecticut portion of the New
York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island,
NY–NJ–CT (Southwest Connecticut) 8hour ozone nonattainment area and for
the Greater Connecticut 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. These MVEBs were
submitted to EPA as part of the 8-hour
ozone attainment demonstrations and
reasonable further progress plans for
these areas. Although not required by
the Clean Air Act or EPA regulation,
Connecticut included the 2012 budgets
in its ozone attainment demonstrations
based on uncertainty as to whether
attainment would be met by the
applicable June 15, 2010 attainment
date for the two nonattainment areas.
EPA found Connecticut’s 2008, 2009,
and 2012 MVEBs adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. See
73 FR 33428; June 12, 2008.
On August 23, 2010, CT DEP
withdrew the 2012 MVEBs from its 8hour ozone attainment demonstration
SIP for both ozone nonattainment areas.
At that time, CT DEP also requested that
EPA withdraw the adequacy findings for
the 2012 MVEBs, since both ozone
nonattainment areas have monitored air
quality data demonstrating attainment
of the 1997 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard, and the
2012 MVEBs are no longer necessary to
ensure attainment.1
Connecticut’s request to withdraw the
2012 MVEBs was announced on EPA’s
conformity Web site, and received no
comments. (See https://www.epa.gov/
otaq/stateresources/transconf/
adequacy.htm. Once there, click on
‘‘What SIP submissions are currently
under EPA adequacy review?’’)
On December 30, 2010, EPA sent a
letter to the CT DEP withdrawing our
previous adequacy finding on the 2012
MVEBs for the Southwest Connecticut
and the Greater Connecticut 8-hour
ozone nonattainment areas.
The 2012 MVEBs are withdrawn for
transportation conformity purposes.
However, the 2008 (reasonable further
progress) MVEBs and the 2009
(attainment) MVEBs that were
previously deemed adequate, remain
adequate for transportation conformity
purposes.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671 q.
1 EPA has determined that the Greater
Connecticut area has attained the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard. See 75 FR 53219; August 31, 2010.
EPA has not yet taken action regarding the
Southwest Connecticut area.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2011 / Notices
Dated: February 1, 2011.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. 2011–3385 Filed 2–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission,
Comments Requested
February 8, 2011.
The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Comments are requested concerning: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, and (e) ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before April 18, 2011.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via fax at 202–
395–5167 or via the Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Feb 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
to the Federal Communications
Commission via e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie F. Smith, Office of Managing
Director, (202) 418–0217, or via the
Internet at Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0430.
Title: Section 1.1206, Permit-butDisclose Proceedings.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Individuals or
household; Business or other for-profit;
Not-for-profit institutions; Federal
Government; and State, local, or tribal
government.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 9,990 respondents; 9,990
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.5
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirements; recordkeeping;
third party disclosure.
Obligation To Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for this information collection
is contained in Sections 4(i) and 4(j),
303(r), and 409 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
154(i) and 154(j), 303(r), and 409.
Total Annual Burden: 4,995 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $0.00.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
impacts.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
The Commission is not requesting that
the respondents submit confidential
information to the FCC. Respondents
may, however, request confidential
treatment for information they believe to
be confidential under 47 CFR 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: The Commission’s
rules, under 47 CFR 1.1206, require that
a public record be made of ex parte
presentations (i.e., written presentations
not served on all parties to the
proceeding or oral presentations as to
which all parties have not been given
notice and an opportunity to be present)
to decision-making personnel in
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceedings, such
as notice-and-comment rulemakings and
declaratory ruling proceedings. Persons
making such presentations must file two
copies of written presentations and two
copies of memoranda reflecting new
data or arguments in oral presentations
no later than the next business day after
the presentation; alternatively, in
proceedings in which electronic filing is
permitted, a copy may be filed
electronically. The information is used
by parties to permit-but-disclose
proceedings, including interested
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8737
members of the public, to respond to the
arguments made and data offered in the
presentations. The responses may then
be used by the Commission in its
decision-making. The availability of the
ex parte materials ensures that the
Commission’s decisional processes are
fair, impartial, and comport with the
concept of due process in that all
interested parties can know of and
respond to the arguments made to the
decision-making officials.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–3288 Filed 2–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Notice of information
collections to be submitted to OMB for
review and approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
AGENCY:
In accordance with
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice
that it plans to submit to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for OMB review and approval of
the information collections described
below.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted on
or before March 17, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
the FDIC by any of the following
methods:
• https://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/
laws/federal/notices.html.
• E-mail: comments@fdic.gov.
Include the name of the collection in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Leneta G. Gregorie (202–898–
3719), Counsel, Room F–1084, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
• Hand Delivery: Comments may be
hand-delivered to the guard station at
the rear of the 17th Street Building
(located on F Street), on business days
between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
All comments should refer to the
relevant OMB control number. A copy
of the comments may also be submitted
to the OMB desk officer for the FDIC:
Office of Information and Regulatory
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8736-8737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3385]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0117; A-1-FRL-9267-1]
Status of Motor Vehicle Budgets in Submitted State Implementation
Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes; Connecticut; Notice of
Withdrawal of Adequacy of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is notifying the public that EPA has withdrawn its
previous adequacy finding on the 2012 motor vehicle emission budgets
(MVEBs) for Connecticut's two 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. EPA has
withdrawn the adequacy finding because Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (CT DEP) withdrew its 2012 motor vehicle
emission budgets from its eight-hour ozone attainment demonstration SIP
for both ozone nonattainment areas. As a result of our finding,
Connecticut can not use these 2012 motor vehicle emission budgets for
future conformity determinations.
DATES: This finding is effective March 2, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald O. Cooke, Environmental
Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Five Post Office Square, Suite
100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02109-3912, (617) 918-1668, cooke.donald@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Today's action is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made.
On February 1, 2008, Connecticut submitted 2008, 2009, and 2012
summer day volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)
MVEBs for the Connecticut portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-
Long Island, NY-NJ-CT (Southwest Connecticut) 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area and for the Greater Connecticut 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. These MVEBs were submitted to EPA as part of the 8-
hour ozone attainment demonstrations and reasonable further progress
plans for these areas. Although not required by the Clean Air Act or
EPA regulation, Connecticut included the 2012 budgets in its ozone
attainment demonstrations based on uncertainty as to whether attainment
would be met by the applicable June 15, 2010 attainment date for the
two nonattainment areas. EPA found Connecticut's 2008, 2009, and 2012
MVEBs adequate for transportation conformity purposes. See 73 FR 33428;
June 12, 2008.
On August 23, 2010, CT DEP withdrew the 2012 MVEBs from its 8-hour
ozone attainment demonstration SIP for both ozone nonattainment areas.
At that time, CT DEP also requested that EPA withdraw the adequacy
findings for the 2012 MVEBs, since both ozone nonattainment areas have
monitored air quality data demonstrating attainment of the 1997 8-hour
ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, and the 2012 MVEBs are no
longer necessary to ensure attainment.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA has determined that the Greater Connecticut area has
attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. See 75 FR 53219; August 31,
2010. EPA has not yet taken action regarding the Southwest
Connecticut area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connecticut's request to withdraw the 2012 MVEBs was announced on
EPA's conformity Web site, and received no comments. (See https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. Once there,
click on ``What SIP submissions are currently under EPA adequacy
review?'')
On December 30, 2010, EPA sent a letter to the CT DEP withdrawing
our previous adequacy finding on the 2012 MVEBs for the Southwest
Connecticut and the Greater Connecticut 8-hour ozone nonattainment
areas.
The 2012 MVEBs are withdrawn for transportation conformity
purposes. However, the 2008 (reasonable further progress) MVEBs and the
2009 (attainment) MVEBs that were previously deemed adequate, remain
adequate for transportation conformity purposes.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671 q.
[[Page 8737]]
Dated: February 1, 2011.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2011-3385 Filed 2-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P