Safety Zone; Miami International Triathlon, Bayfront Park, Miami, FL, 8656-8658 [2011-3323]
Download as PDF
8656
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing a Regulated
Navigation Area restricting tugs with
less than 3,000 total horsepower from
transiting the Hudson River when ice
thickness is on average eight inches or
greater. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
■
§ 165.165 Regulated Navigation Area;
Hudson River South of the Troy Locks, NY.
(a) Regulated navigation area. All
navigable waters of the Hudson River
south of the Troy Locks.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer, or a Federal,
State, or local law enforcement officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port (COTP) New York.
(2) Horsepower (HP) means the total
maximum continuous shaft horsepower
of all the vessel’s main propulsion
machinery.
(c) Applicability. This section applies
to tugs with less than 3,000 horsepower
when engaged in towing operations.
(d) Regulations. (1) Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this
section, vessels less than 3,000
horsepower while engaged in towing
operations are not authorized to transit
that portion of the Hudson River south
of the Troy Locks when ice thickness on
average is eight inches or greater.
(2) All Coast Guard assets enforcing
this Regulated Navigation Area can be
contacted on VHF marine band radio,
channel 13 or 16. The COTP can be
contacted at (718) 354–4356, and the
public may contact the COTP to suggest
changes or improvements in the terms
of this Regulated Navigation Area.
(3) All persons desiring to transit
through a portion of the regulated area
that has operating restrictions in effect
must contact the COTP at telephone
number (718) 354–4356 or on VHF
channel 13 or 16 to seek permission
prior to transiting the affected regulated
area.
(4) The COTP will notify the public of
any changes in the status of this
Regulated Navigation Area by Marine
Safety Information Broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio, channel 22A
(157.1 MHZ).
Dated: January 20, 2011.
Daniel A. Neptun,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–3351 Filed 2–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
15:22 Feb 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0010]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Miami International
Triathlon, Bayfront Park, Miami, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the waters east of Bayfront Park for the
Miami International Triathlon in Miami,
Florida. The triathlon is scheduled to
take place on March 20, 2011. The
temporary safety zone is necessary for
the safety of triathlon participants,
participant vessels, and the general
public during the swim portion of the
triathlon. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the safety zone unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Miami or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
until 9:30 a.m. on March 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0010 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0010 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Paul A.
Steiner, Sector Miami Prevention
Department, Coast Guard; telephone
305–535–8724, e-mail
Paul.A.Steiner@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
2. Add § 165.165 to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
Coast Guard did not receive notice of
the triathlon with sufficient time to
publish an NPRM and to receive public
comments prior to the triathlon. Any
delay in the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to
minimize the potential danger to
triathlon participants as well as the
general public.
Background and Purpose
On March 20, 2011, Paramount
Productions LLC is hosting the Miami
International Triathlon. This triathlon
includes a 0.9 mile swim, which will
take place in the waters east of Bayfront
Park in Miami, Florida. Approximately
1,500 individuals are scheduled to
compete in the triathlon. This safety
zone is necessary to protect triathlon
participants, participant vessels, and the
general public during the effective
period.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone encompasses certain
navigable waters east of Bayfront Park in
Miami, Florida. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the safety zone unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Miami or a designated
representative. The safety zone will be
in effect from 7 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on
March 20, 2011.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Feb 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
regulatory evaluation is unnecessary.
This rule may have some impact on the
public, but these potential impacts will
be minimal for the following reasons:
(1) The rule will be in effect for less than
three hours; (2) vessel traffic in the area
during the effective period will be
minimal; (3) although persons and
vessels will not be able to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone without authorization from
the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative, they will be
able to operate in the surrounding area
during the effective period; (4) persons
and vessels may still enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone if authorized by the Captain
of the Port Miami or a designated
representative; (5) advance notification
will be made to the local maritime
community via broadcast notice to
mariners; and (6) the triathlon host will
distribute informational materials in
advance of the triathlon.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
waters east of Bayfront Park that are
encompassed within the safety zone
from 7 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on March 20,
2011. For the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section
above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8657
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
8658
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 Feb 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment.
This rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves
establishing a temporary safety zone, as
described in paragraph (34)(g), that will
be in effect for less than three hours. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6,160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0010 to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T07–0010 Safety Zone; Miami
International Triathlon, Bayfront Park,
Miami, FL.
(a) Regulated area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone. All
waters east of Bayfront Park
encompasses within an imaginary line
connecting the following points:
Starting at Point 1 in position 25°46′36″
N, 80°11′04″ W; thence east to Point 2
in position 25°46′36″ N, 80°10′51″ W;
thence southeast to Point 3 in position
25°46′25″ N, 80°10′44″ W; thence
southwest to Point 4 in position
25°46′19″ N, 80°11′05″ W; thence north
back to origin. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Miami in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Miami or a designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port Miami
via telephone at 305–535–4472, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16, to seek permission. If
permission to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area is granted by the Captain
of the Port Miami or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such permission must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port Miami or a designated
representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area via
broadcast notice to mariners and by onscene designated representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 7 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on
March 20, 2011.
Dated: January 26, 2011.
G.J. Depinet,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2011–3323 Filed 2–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Part 148
[USCG–2009–0091]
RIN 1625–AB47
Bulk Solid Hazardous Materials:
Harmonization With the International
Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC)
Code
Coast Guard, DHS.
Rule; information collection
approval.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On October 19, 2010, the
Coast Guard amended its regulations
governing the carriage of solid
hazardous materials in bulk to allow use
of the IMSBC Code as an equivalent
form of compliance. The amendment
triggered information collection
requirements affecting the Special
Permits issued by the Coast Guard that
allow the carriage of hazardous bulk
solid materials not addressed in the
amended regulations. This notice
announces that the collection of
information has been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15FER1.SGM
15FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8656-8658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3323]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0010]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Miami International Triathlon, Bayfront Park, Miami,
FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
waters east of Bayfront Park for the Miami International Triathlon in
Miami, Florida. The triathlon is scheduled to take place on March 20,
2011. The temporary safety zone is necessary for the safety of
triathlon participants, participant vessels, and the general public
during the swim portion of the triathlon. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Miami or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on March 20,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0010 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0010 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Paul A. Steiner, Sector Miami
Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone 305-535-8724, e-mail
Paul.A.Steiner@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a)
[[Page 8657]]
of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive
notice of the triathlon with sufficient time to publish an NPRM and to
receive public comments prior to the triathlon. Any delay in the
effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to minimize the potential danger to
triathlon participants as well as the general public.
Background and Purpose
On March 20, 2011, Paramount Productions LLC is hosting the Miami
International Triathlon. This triathlon includes a 0.9 mile swim, which
will take place in the waters east of Bayfront Park in Miami, Florida.
Approximately 1,500 individuals are scheduled to compete in the
triathlon. This safety zone is necessary to protect triathlon
participants, participant vessels, and the general public during the
effective period.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone encompasses certain navigable waters east of
Bayfront Park in Miami, Florida. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within
the safety zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port Miami or a designated representative. The safety zone will be in
effect from 7 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on March 20, 2011.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full regulatory evaluation is unnecessary. This rule may have some
impact on the public, but these potential impacts will be minimal for
the following reasons: (1) The rule will be in effect for less than
three hours; (2) vessel traffic in the area during the effective period
will be minimal; (3) although persons and vessels will not be able to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone
without authorization from the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative, they will be able to operate in the
surrounding area during the effective period; (4) persons and vessels
may still enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative; (5) advance notification will be made to the
local maritime community via broadcast notice to mariners; and (6) the
triathlon host will distribute informational materials in advance of
the triathlon.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the waters east of
Bayfront Park that are encompassed within the safety zone from 7 a.m.
until 9:30 a.m. on March 20, 2011. For the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health
[[Page 8658]]
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant
rule and does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that may disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a
temporary safety zone, as described in paragraph (34)(g), that will be
in effect for less than three hours. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0010 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0010 Safety Zone; Miami International Triathlon,
Bayfront Park, Miami, FL.
(a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a safety zone.
All waters east of Bayfront Park encompasses within an imaginary line
connecting the following points: Starting at Point 1 in position
25[deg]46'36'' N, 80[deg]11'04'' W; thence east to Point 2 in position
25[deg]46'36'' N, 80[deg]10'51'' W; thence southeast to Point 3 in
position 25[deg]46'25'' N, 80[deg]10'44'' W; thence southwest to Point
4 in position 25[deg]46'19'' N, 80[deg]11'05'' W; thence north back to
origin. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Miami in the enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Miami or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Miami via telephone at 305-535-4472, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to seek permission. If
permission to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
permission must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port
Miami or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area via
broadcast notice to mariners and by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 7 a.m. until 9:30
a.m. on March 20, 2011.
Dated: January 26, 2011.
G.J. Depinet,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2011-3323 Filed 2-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P