Amendments to Deposit Insurance Regulations: Deposit Insurance Coverage Training; SMDIA Notification, 7740-7743 [2011-3085]
Download as PDF
7740
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(H) An insurance company subject to
supervision by a State or foreign
insurance authority; and
(v) The aggregate dollar amount of
revenues or assets treated by the
company as not financially related
under this paragraph (e)(2) does not
exceed 5 percent of the consolidated
annual gross financial revenues of the
company or the consolidated total
financial assets of the company,
respectively, in that year.
(f) Requests regarding activities that
may be financial in nature. (1) In
general. A company may request a
determination from the Board as to
whether a particular activity is financial
in nature for purposes of this section.
(2) Required information. A request
submitted under this paragraph (f) must
be in writing and must—
(i) Identify and describe the activity
for which the determination is sought,
specifically describing what the activity
involves and how the activity is
conducted;
(ii) Explain in detail why the activity
should or should not be considered
financial in nature for purposes of this
section; and
(iii) Provide information supporting
the requested determination and any
other information required by the Board
concerning the activity.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 225.302 Significant nonbank financial
companies and significant bank holding
companies.
(a) In general. This section defines the
terms ‘‘significant nonbank financial
company’’ and ‘‘significant bank holding
company’’ as such terms are used in—
(1) Section 113 of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (‘‘Dodd-Frank
Act’’) (12 U.S.C. 5323) relating to the
designation of nonbank financial
companies by the Financial Stability
Oversight Council for supervision by the
Board; and
(2) Section 165(d)(2) of the DoddFrank Act (12 U.S.C. 5365(d)(2)) relating
to the credit exposure reports required
to be filed by—
(i) A nonbank financial company
supervised by the Board; and
(ii) A bank holding company or
foreign bank subject to the Bank
Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1841
et seq.) that has $50 billion or more in
total consolidated assets.
(b) Significant nonbank financial
company. A ‘‘significant nonbank
financial company’’ means—
(1) Any nonbank financial company
supervised by the Board; and
(2) Any other nonbank financial
company that had $50 billion or more
in total consolidated assets (as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Feb 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
determined in accordance with
applicable accounting standards) as of
the end of its most recently completed
fiscal year.
(c) Significant bank holding company.
A ‘‘significant bank holding company’’
means any bank holding company or
foreign bank treated as a bank holding
company under section 8(a) of the
International Banking Act of 1978 (12
U.S.C. 3106(a)) that had $50 billion or
more in total consolidated assets as of
the end of the most recently completed
calendar year, as reported—
(1) In the case of a bank holding
company (other than a foreign banking
organization), on the Federal Reserve’s
FR Y–9C (Consolidated Financial
Statements for Bank Holding
Companies); and
(2) In the case of a foreign banking
organization that is or is treated as a
bank holding company, on the Federal
Reserve’s Form FR Y–7Q (Capital and
Asset Report for Foreign Banking
Organizations).
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, February 7, 2011.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011–2978 Filed 2–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 330
RIN 3064–AD37
Amendments to Deposit Insurance
Regulations: Deposit Insurance
Coverage Training; SMDIA Notification
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
with request for comments.
AGENCY:
The FDIC is proposing a rule
that would promote public confidence
in Federal deposit insurance by
providing depositors with improved
access to accurate information about
FDIC insurance coverage of their
accounts at insured depository
institutions (IDIs). The proposed rule
would accomplish this goal in three
ways. First, it would require certain IDI
personnel to complete FDIC-provided
training on the fundamentals of FDIC
deposit insurance coverage. These IDI
personnel would include any employee
with authority to open deposit accounts
and/or respond to customer questions
about FDIC insurance coverage
(hereafter ‘‘employees’’). Second, the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed rule would require IDIs to
implement procedures so that
employees, when opening a new deposit
account, inquire whether the customer
has an ownership interest in any other
account at the IDI and, if so, whether the
customer’s aggregate ownership interest
in deposit accounts, including the new
account, exceeds the Standard
Maximum Deposit Insurance Amount
(‘‘SMDIA’’). If this is the case, then the
IDI employee would be required to
provide the customer with a copy of the
FDIC’s publication, Deposit Insurance
Summary. The proposed rule would
apply to deposit accounts opened in
person at the IDI, by telephone, mail,
and via the Internet or other technology.
Third, the rule would require IDIs to
provide a link to the FDIC’s Electronic
Deposit Insurance Estimator (‘‘EDIE’’) on
any Web site the IDI maintains for use
by deposit customers.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by the FDIC no later than April
12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
the FDIC by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/
propose.html. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• E-mail: comments@fdic.gov.
Include RIN # 3064–AD37 in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Comments
may be hand-delivered to the guard
station located at the rear of the FDIC’s
550 17th Street building (accessible
from F Street) on business days between
7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and use the
title ‘‘Part 330—Deposit Insurance
Education.’’ All comments received will
be posted generally without change to
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/propose.html, including any
personal information provided. Paper
copies of public comments may be
ordered from the Public Information
Center by telephone at (877) 275–3342
or (703) 562–2200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin W. Becker, Senior Consumer
Affairs Specialist, Deposit Insurance
Section, Division of Supervision and
Consumer Protection, (202) 898–6644,
mbecker@fdic.gov; or Catherine A.
E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM
11FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Ribnick, Counsel, Legal Division, (202)
898–6803, cribnick@fdic.gov; Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Insured Depository Institution
Employee Education on Deposit
Insurance
FDIC regulations currently do not
require employees at IDIs to be trained
in the basic principles of FDIC deposit
insurance coverage or to assist
customers in ascertaining whether their
deposits are fully covered by Federal
deposit insurance. The FDIC receives
tens of thousands of telephone calls, emails and correspondence annually
from depositors and IDI employees
seeking information and advice about
FDIC deposit insurance coverage. These
inquiries reveal that many depositors do
not know whether their deposits are
fully insured and that bank employees
often are unfamiliar with the scope of
deposit insurance coverage. In addition,
the FDIC regularly receives complaints
from IDI customers, asserting that their
banks were unable to answer their
deposit insurance questions or, in some
cases, may have provided inaccurate
deposit insurance guidance. The FDIC is
concerned that these situations could
cause financial harm to depositors and
have the potential to undermine
customer confidence in depository
institutions and the Federal deposit
insurance system.
To address the issues described
above, the FDIC is proposing to add a
new section to its insurance regulations,
which appear at 12 CFR Part 330. This
new section would establish three new
requirements for IDIs.
First, IDIs would be required to have
employees with the authority to open
deposit accounts and/or respond to
customer questions about FDIC deposit
insurance coverage complete a
computer-based instructional (‘‘CBI’’)
program provided to IDIs by the FDIC.
This program would provide users with
an introduction to FDIC deposit
insurance coverage, with specific focus
on the general principles of insurance
coverage and the rules and requirements
for the account ownership categories. It
would also introduce users to the
information resources available from the
FDIC, including EDIE, deposit insurance
guides and on-demand videos. Further,
this self-paced training module would
include frequent knowledge checks to
help the user evaluate his or her
understanding of the information
presented.
This self-administered training
program would require less than two
hours for most employees to complete.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Feb 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
All employees would be required to
complete the training once in every 12month period. Each new employee with
the duties previously described would
be required to take the training within
30 days of commencing employment.
Current employees at the time of the
effective date of the final rule would be
required to take the training within 60
days of the effective date.
Further, IDIs are encouraged to
provide additional training, using a
range of media, to help employees
understand the FDIC’s deposit
insurance rules. The FDIC provides
multiple, cost-free training resources on
the deposit insurance rules to the
industry, for use on a voluntary basis,
including in-person training sessions,
written materials, videos, EDIE and
telephone seminars presented by FDIC
personnel.
Second, IDIs would be required to
institute procedures ensuring that,
regardless of the manner in which a
customer opens a new account, the
employee opening the account must
inquire as to the existence of other
deposit accounts at the same IDI and
whether the aggregated account balance
exceeds the SMDIA, currently $250,000.
Thus, for an account opened in person
or by telephone, the employee opening
the account would ask the customer
whether the customer maintains any
other accounts at the IDI (including
accounts opened at other IDI branch
locations) and, if so, whether the
combined balances of all the accounts
exceed the SMDIA. If the response is in
the affirmative, the IDI employee would
provide the customer with a copy of the
FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Summary
publication. In the case of deposit
accounts opened by mail, via the
Internet or by means of other
technology, these inquiries can be
included in the paper or electronic
application form, with a link to the
Deposit Insurance Summary publication
supplied. The rule would not require an
IDI to provide counsel or advice to the
customer regarding how to structure
multiple deposit accounts to maximize
deposit insurance coverage.
The rule would apply to all types of
deposit accounts opened by a customer,
with the exception of pass-through
accounts as to which the IDI does not,
in the normal course of business, keep
records of the beneficial owners. The
rule would not impose a deposit
insurance training requirement on third
parties (e.g., deposit brokers or affinity
groups) that directly or indirectly
promote the deposit of funds in a
specified IDI. However, the FDIC makes
ample deposit insurance resources
publicly available, and the Corporation
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7741
urges any entity that encourages or
facilitates the placement of deposits in
IDIs to provide appropriate information
in response to client inquiries regarding
FDIC deposit insurance coverage.
Third, the proposed rule would
require an IDI to provide a link to EDIE
on any Web site it maintains for use by
customers. IDIs can link to EDIE, at no
cost, in two ways—via Online EDIE or
Brandable EDIE. Online EDIE is
available directly from the FDIC’s Web
site at https://www.fdic.gov/edie. With
Online EDIE, IDIs link to the
application, which resides on the FDIC’s
Web site, and IDI customers are then
taken from the IDI’s Web site to the
FDIC’s Web site. Brandable EDIE, which
can be accessed free from FDIC Connect,
allows an IDI to customize and integrate
the EDIE application into the IDI’s own
Web site, so customers can access EDIE
without leaving the IDI’s Web site.
II. Regulatory Burden on Insured
Depository Institutions
The FDIC believes the
implementation of this rule would not
impose a significant regulatory burden
on the industry. The proposed rule is
circumscribed and modest in its
requirements. First, IDI employees with
authority to open accounts and/or
respond to a customer’s deposit
insurance question would be required to
complete a short training program
annually. The training program would
be provided to IDIs by the FDIC at no
cost. Second, when opening a new
account, employees would simply
inquire (1) whether the customer has
other deposits at the same IDI and (2)
whether such deposits, including the
new account, exceed the SMDIA. The
rule would not require IDI employees to
advise customers on how to maximize
deposit insurance coverage. The
proposed rule would require IDI
employees to provide the customer with
the FDIC’s publication, Deposit
Insurance Summary. Lastly, the rule
would require an IDI to maintain a link
to EDIE on its Web site.
The Corporation believes it is
reasonable to expect employees at IDIs
to have sufficient familiarity with basic
rules for Federal deposit insurance
coverage so employees can provide
accurate information to customers who
wish to confirm their deposit insurance
coverage. To the extent that compliance
with the proposed rule imposes an
obligation on the industry, it must be
weighed against the benefit to
depositors by reinforcing their
confidence in Federal deposit insurance
and preventing unnecessary financial
losses to customers if their IDI should
fail.
E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM
11FEP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
7742
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
III. Request for Comments
The FDIC requests comment on all
aspects of the proposed rule, including
cost, regulatory burden and benefits to
consumers. In particular, the FDIC seeks
comments with respect to the following
questions:
• Does the proposed rule strike the
right balance between meeting
depositors’ need for accurate deposit
insurance information and the potential
cost to and regulatory burden on IDIs?
• Is the scope of the proposed rule
appropriate? In its present form, the rule
would require training for all IDI
employees with authority to open
accounts and/or respond to customers’
inquiries on deposit insurance coverage.
Should the training extend to all IDI
employees who work in bank retail
offices, not just the employees with
these specific responsibilities?
• The rule would require IDI
employees to inquire whether the
customer has an ownership interest in
any other deposit accounts at the IDI
and, if so, whether the customer’s total
ownership interest in deposit accounts,
including the new account, exceeds the
Standard Maximum Deposit Insurance
Amount. Should the inquiry only apply
to aggregated deposits that exceed the
SMDIA of $250,000 or to aggregated
deposits that may approach the SMDIA?
And if so, what dollar amount or
percentage of the SMDIA should trigger
the obligation to provide depositors
with the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance
Summary publication?
• In addition to requiring IDIs to
make EDIE available on their Web sites,
should the FDIC require IDIs to
maintain, in their retail office lobbies, a
dedicated computer terminal containing
the EDIE application, which all
customers could use on their own, or
with assistance from IDI employees, to
generate reports on the customer’s
deposit insurance coverage?
• In addition to requiring IDIs to
provide the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance
Summary publication to depositors
whose combined deposits at the IDI
exceed the SMDIA, should IDIs be
required to make this publication
available in their retail office lobbies so
all depositors have access to this
important information?
• Should the CBI software program
include a feature that would allow IDIs
to confirm that training has been
completed by covered employees?
IV. Regulatory Analysis and Procedure
A. Solicitation of Comments on Use of
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, Public Law 106–102, 113
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Feb 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
Stat. 1338, 1471 (Nov. 12, 1999),
requires the Federal banking agencies to
use plain language in all proposed and
final rules published after January 1,
2000. We invite your comments on how
to make this proposal easier to
understand. For example, have we
organized the material to suit your
needs? If not, how could this material be
better organized? Are the requirements
in the proposed regulation clearly
stated? If not, how could the regulation
be more clearly stated? Does the
proposed regulation contain language or
jargon that is not clear? If so, which
language requires clarification? Would a
different format (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing)
make the regulation easier to
understand? If so, what changes to the
format would make the regulation easier
to understand? What else could we do
to make the regulation easier to
understand?
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
Request for Comment on Proposed
Information Collection
In accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Ch. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC
may not conduct or sponsor, and the
respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number.
The proposed rule requires IDIs to
implement procedures so that,
whenever a customer opens a new
deposit account at an insured
depository institution, the employee
opening the account shall inquire
whether the customer has an ownership
interest in any other accounts at the IDI
and, if so, whether the customer’s
aggregate ownership interest in deposit
accounts, including the new account,
exceeds the Standard Maximum Deposit
Insurance Amount. If the customer
responds affirmatively, then the IDI
employee shall provide the customer
with the FDIC’s publication, Deposit
Insurance Summary. Since this is an
FDIC-prepared publication, there is no
paperwork burden involved. In the case
of deposit accounts opened by mail or
via the Internet or other technology, the
publication can be provided in paper
form or through a link to the electronic
version.
Commenters may submit comments
on aspects of this notice that may affect
reporting and disclosure requirements
to the addresses listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this NPR. Paperwork Burden
comments should reference ‘‘Part 330—
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Deposit Insurance Education, OMB
Control No. 3064–NEW.’’
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(‘‘RFA’’) requires a Federal agency
publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking to prepare and make
available for public comment an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis that
describes the impact of the proposed
rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
Pursuant to regulations issued by the
Small Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201), a ‘‘small entity’’ includes a
bank holding company, commercial
bank or savings association with assets
of $175 million or less (collectively,
small banking organizations). The RFA
provides that an agency is not required
to prepare and publish a regulatory
flexibility analysis if the agency certifies
that the proposed rule would not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. 5 U.S.C.
605(b). Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
RFA, the FDIC certifies that the
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
D. The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999—
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
The FDIC has determined that the
proposed rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of
section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act,
enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 268).
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 330
Bank deposit insurance, Banks,
banking, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings and loan
associations, Trusts and trustees.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board of Directors of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
proposes to amend part 330 of Title 12
of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 330—DEPOSIT INSURANCE
COVERAGE
1. The authority citation for part 330
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1813(l), 1813(m),
1817(i), 1818(q), 1819(Tenth), 1820(g),
1821(a).
2. Add § 330.17 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM
11FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 330.17
Deposit insurance training.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this
section is to maintain confidence in
Federally insured depository
institutions and to protect depositors by
requiring insured depository institution
employees with authority to open
accounts and/or respond to customer
inquiries regarding deposit insurance
coverage (‘‘employees’’), to complete
training on basic deposit insurance
principles once in any twelve month
period. New employees must complete
the training within 30 days of
commencing employment. Current
employees are required to complete the
training within 60 days of the effective
date of the final rule.
(b) Applicability. The requirements in
this section shall apply to all insured
depository institution employees who
have the authority to open accounts
and/or respond to customer inquiries
regarding deposit insurance coverage.
(c) Procedure. (1) Insured Depository
Institution Personnel Education. (i)
Training. An insured depository
institution must require each employee
with the authority to open accounts
and/or respond to customer inquiries
regarding deposit insurance coverage to
complete basic deposit insurance
training annually, using an FDICprovided training module. Each new
employee with the authority to open
accounts and/or respond to customer
inquiries regarding deposit insurance
coverage must be required to undergo
such training within 30 days of
commencing employment.
(ii) Training Materials. The FDIC will
provide the training module in the form
of a self-administered computer-based
instructional program.
(2) Ascertaining Insured Status. An
insured depository institution must
implement procedures so that,
whenever a customer opens a new
deposit account at an insured
depository institution, the employee
opening the account shall inquire
whether the customer has an ownership
interest in any other accounts at the IDI
and, if so, whether the customer’s
aggregate ownership interest in deposit
accounts, including the new account,
exceeds the Standard Maximum Deposit
Insurance Amount. If the customer
responds affirmatively, then the IDI
employee shall provide the customer
with the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance
Summary publication. In the case of
deposit accounts opened by mail or via
the Internet or other technology, these
inquiries can be included in the paper
or electronic application form, with the
link to the Deposit Insurance Summary
publication provided.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Feb 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
7743
(d) Definitions. (1) Account shall
mean a deposit account at a depository
institution that is held by or offered to
a customer. It includes time, demand,
savings, and negotiable order of
withdrawal accounts. The term does not
include a fiduciary account as to which
the insured depository institution does
not, in the normal course of business,
keep records of beneficial owners of the
deposits in the account.
(2) New Account shall mean any
deposit account at an insured
depository institution to which the
insured depository institution assigns a
unique identifier that serves to
distinguish the account from other,
existing accounts at the depository
institution.
drug that is directed to healthcare
professionals who prescribe, administer,
or dispense medications and is not
included in OTC drug product labeling
for consumers. FDA is issuing this
proposed rule after a careful review of
new data and information on the serious
side effects that have been associated
with the customary dose of OTC sodium
phosphates solution (approximately 60
grams (g) of sodium phosphates taken in
two 45-milliliter (mL) doses 12 hours
apart or approximately 50 g of sodium
phosphates taken in a 45-mL dose
followed by a 30-mL dose 12 hours
later) for bowel cleansing prior to
colonoscopy. This proposed rule is part
of FDA’s ongoing review of OTC drug
products.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
February, 2011.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
DATES:
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–3085 Filed 2–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Submit electronic or written
comments by March 14, 2011. See
section VI of this document for the
effective date of any final rule that may
publish based on this proposal.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–1978–N–
0021 (formerly Docket No. 78–N–036L)
and RIN number 0910–AF38, by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
21 CFR Parts 310 and 334
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
[Docket No. FDA–1978–N–0021; Formerly
Docket No. 78N–036L]
Written Submissions
Food and Drug Administration
RIN 0910–AF38
Professional Labeling for Laxative
Drug Products for Over-the-Counter
Human Use; Proposed Amendment to
the Tentative Final Monograph
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing a
proposed rulemaking to amend the
tentative final monograph (1985 TFM)
for over-the-counter (OTC) laxative drug
products (products that relieve
occasional constipation). FDA is
proposing that sodium phosphate salts
(dibasic sodium phosphate, monobasic
sodium phosphate, and the combination
of dibasic sodium phosphate/monobasic
sodium phosphate salts in a solution
dosage form) are not generally
recognized as safe (GRAS) for bowel
cleansing. This document also would
withdraw the professional labeling
proposed for sodium phosphate salts in
the 1985 TFM. Professional labeling is
additional information about an OTC
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (For
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number (Docket No. FDA–1978–N–
0021) (formerly Docket No. 78N–036L)
and Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) (RIN 0910–AF38) for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket, to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM
11FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7740-7743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3085]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 330
RIN 3064-AD37
Amendments to Deposit Insurance Regulations: Deposit Insurance
Coverage Training; SMDIA Notification
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FDIC is proposing a rule that would promote public
confidence in Federal deposit insurance by providing depositors with
improved access to accurate information about FDIC insurance coverage
of their accounts at insured depository institutions (IDIs). The
proposed rule would accomplish this goal in three ways. First, it would
require certain IDI personnel to complete FDIC-provided training on the
fundamentals of FDIC deposit insurance coverage. These IDI personnel
would include any employee with authority to open deposit accounts and/
or respond to customer questions about FDIC insurance coverage
(hereafter ``employees''). Second, the proposed rule would require IDIs
to implement procedures so that employees, when opening a new deposit
account, inquire whether the customer has an ownership interest in any
other account at the IDI and, if so, whether the customer's aggregate
ownership interest in deposit accounts, including the new account,
exceeds the Standard Maximum Deposit Insurance Amount (``SMDIA''). If
this is the case, then the IDI employee would be required to provide
the customer with a copy of the FDIC's publication, Deposit Insurance
Summary. The proposed rule would apply to deposit accounts opened in
person at the IDI, by telephone, mail, and via the Internet or other
technology. Third, the rule would require IDIs to provide a link to the
FDIC's Electronic Deposit Insurance Estimator (``EDIE'') on any Web
site the IDI maintains for use by deposit customers.
DATES: Written comments must be received by the FDIC no later than
April 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to
the FDIC by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/propose.html. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: comments@fdic.gov. Include RIN 3064-AD37
in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary, Attention:
Comments, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Comments may be hand-delivered to
the guard station located at the rear of the FDIC's 550 17th Street
building (accessible from F Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and
5 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and use
the title ``Part 330--Deposit Insurance Education.'' All comments
received will be posted generally without change to https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/propose.html, including any
personal information provided. Paper copies of public comments may be
ordered from the Public Information Center by telephone at (877) 275-
3342 or (703) 562-2200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin W. Becker, Senior Consumer
Affairs Specialist, Deposit Insurance Section, Division of Supervision
and Consumer Protection, (202) 898-6644, mbecker@fdic.gov; or Catherine
A.
[[Page 7741]]
Ribnick, Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 898-6803, cribnick@fdic.gov;
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Insured Depository Institution Employee Education on Deposit
Insurance
FDIC regulations currently do not require employees at IDIs to be
trained in the basic principles of FDIC deposit insurance coverage or
to assist customers in ascertaining whether their deposits are fully
covered by Federal deposit insurance. The FDIC receives tens of
thousands of telephone calls, e-mails and correspondence annually from
depositors and IDI employees seeking information and advice about FDIC
deposit insurance coverage. These inquiries reveal that many depositors
do not know whether their deposits are fully insured and that bank
employees often are unfamiliar with the scope of deposit insurance
coverage. In addition, the FDIC regularly receives complaints from IDI
customers, asserting that their banks were unable to answer their
deposit insurance questions or, in some cases, may have provided
inaccurate deposit insurance guidance. The FDIC is concerned that these
situations could cause financial harm to depositors and have the
potential to undermine customer confidence in depository institutions
and the Federal deposit insurance system.
To address the issues described above, the FDIC is proposing to add
a new section to its insurance regulations, which appear at 12 CFR Part
330. This new section would establish three new requirements for IDIs.
First, IDIs would be required to have employees with the authority
to open deposit accounts and/or respond to customer questions about
FDIC deposit insurance coverage complete a computer-based instructional
(``CBI'') program provided to IDIs by the FDIC. This program would
provide users with an introduction to FDIC deposit insurance coverage,
with specific focus on the general principles of insurance coverage and
the rules and requirements for the account ownership categories. It
would also introduce users to the information resources available from
the FDIC, including EDIE, deposit insurance guides and on-demand
videos. Further, this self-paced training module would include frequent
knowledge checks to help the user evaluate his or her understanding of
the information presented.
This self-administered training program would require less than two
hours for most employees to complete. All employees would be required
to complete the training once in every 12-month period. Each new
employee with the duties previously described would be required to take
the training within 30 days of commencing employment. Current employees
at the time of the effective date of the final rule would be required
to take the training within 60 days of the effective date.
Further, IDIs are encouraged to provide additional training, using
a range of media, to help employees understand the FDIC's deposit
insurance rules. The FDIC provides multiple, cost-free training
resources on the deposit insurance rules to the industry, for use on a
voluntary basis, including in-person training sessions, written
materials, videos, EDIE and telephone seminars presented by FDIC
personnel.
Second, IDIs would be required to institute procedures ensuring
that, regardless of the manner in which a customer opens a new account,
the employee opening the account must inquire as to the existence of
other deposit accounts at the same IDI and whether the aggregated
account balance exceeds the SMDIA, currently $250,000. Thus, for an
account opened in person or by telephone, the employee opening the
account would ask the customer whether the customer maintains any other
accounts at the IDI (including accounts opened at other IDI branch
locations) and, if so, whether the combined balances of all the
accounts exceed the SMDIA. If the response is in the affirmative, the
IDI employee would provide the customer with a copy of the FDIC's
Deposit Insurance Summary publication. In the case of deposit accounts
opened by mail, via the Internet or by means of other technology, these
inquiries can be included in the paper or electronic application form,
with a link to the Deposit Insurance Summary publication supplied. The
rule would not require an IDI to provide counsel or advice to the
customer regarding how to structure multiple deposit accounts to
maximize deposit insurance coverage.
The rule would apply to all types of deposit accounts opened by a
customer, with the exception of pass-through accounts as to which the
IDI does not, in the normal course of business, keep records of the
beneficial owners. The rule would not impose a deposit insurance
training requirement on third parties (e.g., deposit brokers or
affinity groups) that directly or indirectly promote the deposit of
funds in a specified IDI. However, the FDIC makes ample deposit
insurance resources publicly available, and the Corporation urges any
entity that encourages or facilitates the placement of deposits in IDIs
to provide appropriate information in response to client inquiries
regarding FDIC deposit insurance coverage.
Third, the proposed rule would require an IDI to provide a link to
EDIE on any Web site it maintains for use by customers. IDIs can link
to EDIE, at no cost, in two ways--via Online EDIE or Brandable EDIE.
Online EDIE is available directly from the FDIC's Web site at https://www.fdic.gov/edie. With Online EDIE, IDIs link to the application,
which resides on the FDIC's Web site, and IDI customers are then taken
from the IDI's Web site to the FDIC's Web site. Brandable EDIE, which
can be accessed free from FDIC Connect, allows an IDI to customize and
integrate the EDIE application into the IDI's own Web site, so
customers can access EDIE without leaving the IDI's Web site.
II. Regulatory Burden on Insured Depository Institutions
The FDIC believes the implementation of this rule would not impose
a significant regulatory burden on the industry. The proposed rule is
circumscribed and modest in its requirements. First, IDI employees with
authority to open accounts and/or respond to a customer's deposit
insurance question would be required to complete a short training
program annually. The training program would be provided to IDIs by the
FDIC at no cost. Second, when opening a new account, employees would
simply inquire (1) whether the customer has other deposits at the same
IDI and (2) whether such deposits, including the new account, exceed
the SMDIA. The rule would not require IDI employees to advise customers
on how to maximize deposit insurance coverage. The proposed rule would
require IDI employees to provide the customer with the FDIC's
publication, Deposit Insurance Summary. Lastly, the rule would require
an IDI to maintain a link to EDIE on its Web site.
The Corporation believes it is reasonable to expect employees at
IDIs to have sufficient familiarity with basic rules for Federal
deposit insurance coverage so employees can provide accurate
information to customers who wish to confirm their deposit insurance
coverage. To the extent that compliance with the proposed rule imposes
an obligation on the industry, it must be weighed against the benefit
to depositors by reinforcing their confidence in Federal deposit
insurance and preventing unnecessary financial losses to customers if
their IDI should fail.
[[Page 7742]]
III. Request for Comments
The FDIC requests comment on all aspects of the proposed rule,
including cost, regulatory burden and benefits to consumers. In
particular, the FDIC seeks comments with respect to the following
questions:
Does the proposed rule strike the right balance between
meeting depositors' need for accurate deposit insurance information and
the potential cost to and regulatory burden on IDIs?
Is the scope of the proposed rule appropriate? In its
present form, the rule would require training for all IDI employees
with authority to open accounts and/or respond to customers' inquiries
on deposit insurance coverage. Should the training extend to all IDI
employees who work in bank retail offices, not just the employees with
these specific responsibilities?
The rule would require IDI employees to inquire whether
the customer has an ownership interest in any other deposit accounts at
the IDI and, if so, whether the customer's total ownership interest in
deposit accounts, including the new account, exceeds the Standard
Maximum Deposit Insurance Amount. Should the inquiry only apply to
aggregated deposits that exceed the SMDIA of $250,000 or to aggregated
deposits that may approach the SMDIA? And if so, what dollar amount or
percentage of the SMDIA should trigger the obligation to provide
depositors with the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Summary publication?
In addition to requiring IDIs to make EDIE available on
their Web sites, should the FDIC require IDIs to maintain, in their
retail office lobbies, a dedicated computer terminal containing the
EDIE application, which all customers could use on their own, or with
assistance from IDI employees, to generate reports on the customer's
deposit insurance coverage?
In addition to requiring IDIs to provide the FDIC's
Deposit Insurance Summary publication to depositors whose combined
deposits at the IDI exceed the SMDIA, should IDIs be required to make
this publication available in their retail office lobbies so all
depositors have access to this important information?
Should the CBI software program include a feature that
would allow IDIs to confirm that training has been completed by covered
employees?
IV. Regulatory Analysis and Procedure
A. Solicitation of Comments on Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Public Law 106-102, 113
Stat. 1338, 1471 (Nov. 12, 1999), requires the Federal banking agencies
to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after
January 1, 2000. We invite your comments on how to make this proposal
easier to understand. For example, have we organized the material to
suit your needs? If not, how could this material be better organized?
Are the requirements in the proposed regulation clearly stated? If not,
how could the regulation be more clearly stated? Does the proposed
regulation contain language or jargon that is not clear? If so, which
language requires clarification? Would a different format (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing) make the regulation
easier to understand? If so, what changes to the format would make the
regulation easier to understand? What else could we do to make the
regulation easier to understand?
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
Request for Comment on Proposed Information Collection
In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Ch. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC may not conduct or
sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an
information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
The proposed rule requires IDIs to implement procedures so that,
whenever a customer opens a new deposit account at an insured
depository institution, the employee opening the account shall inquire
whether the customer has an ownership interest in any other accounts at
the IDI and, if so, whether the customer's aggregate ownership interest
in deposit accounts, including the new account, exceeds the Standard
Maximum Deposit Insurance Amount. If the customer responds
affirmatively, then the IDI employee shall provide the customer with
the FDIC's publication, Deposit Insurance Summary. Since this is an
FDIC-prepared publication, there is no paperwork burden involved. In
the case of deposit accounts opened by mail or via the Internet or
other technology, the publication can be provided in paper form or
through a link to the electronic version.
Commenters may submit comments on aspects of this notice that may
affect reporting and disclosure requirements to the addresses listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this NPR. Paperwork Burden comments should
reference ``Part 330--Deposit Insurance Education, OMB Control No.
3064-NEW.''
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA'') requires a Federal agency
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking to prepare and make
available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
that describes the impact of the proposed rule on small entities. 5
U.S.C. 603(a). Pursuant to regulations issued by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201), a ``small entity'' includes a bank
holding company, commercial bank or savings association with assets of
$175 million or less (collectively, small banking organizations). The
RFA provides that an agency is not required to prepare and publish a
regulatory flexibility analysis if the agency certifies that the
proposed rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). Pursuant to section 605(b)
of the RFA, the FDIC certifies that the proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
The FDIC has determined that the proposed rule will not affect
family well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999
(Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 268).
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 330
Bank deposit insurance, Banks, banking, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings and loan associations, Trusts and trustees.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board of Directors
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation proposes to amend part 330
of Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 330--DEPOSIT INSURANCE COVERAGE
1. The authority citation for part 330 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1813(l), 1813(m), 1817(i), 1818(q),
1819(Tenth), 1820(g), 1821(a).
2. Add Sec. 330.17 to read as follows:
[[Page 7743]]
Sec. 330.17 Deposit insurance training.
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to maintain confidence
in Federally insured depository institutions and to protect depositors
by requiring insured depository institution employees with authority to
open accounts and/or respond to customer inquiries regarding deposit
insurance coverage (``employees''), to complete training on basic
deposit insurance principles once in any twelve month period. New
employees must complete the training within 30 days of commencing
employment. Current employees are required to complete the training
within 60 days of the effective date of the final rule.
(b) Applicability. The requirements in this section shall apply to
all insured depository institution employees who have the authority to
open accounts and/or respond to customer inquiries regarding deposit
insurance coverage.
(c) Procedure. (1) Insured Depository Institution Personnel
Education. (i) Training. An insured depository institution must require
each employee with the authority to open accounts and/or respond to
customer inquiries regarding deposit insurance coverage to complete
basic deposit insurance training annually, using an FDIC-provided
training module. Each new employee with the authority to open accounts
and/or respond to customer inquiries regarding deposit insurance
coverage must be required to undergo such training within 30 days of
commencing employment.
(ii) Training Materials. The FDIC will provide the training module
in the form of a self-administered computer-based instructional
program.
(2) Ascertaining Insured Status. An insured depository institution
must implement procedures so that, whenever a customer opens a new
deposit account at an insured depository institution, the employee
opening the account shall inquire whether the customer has an ownership
interest in any other accounts at the IDI and, if so, whether the
customer's aggregate ownership interest in deposit accounts, including
the new account, exceeds the Standard Maximum Deposit Insurance Amount.
If the customer responds affirmatively, then the IDI employee shall
provide the customer with the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Summary
publication. In the case of deposit accounts opened by mail or via the
Internet or other technology, these inquiries can be included in the
paper or electronic application form, with the link to the Deposit
Insurance Summary publication provided.
(d) Definitions. (1) Account shall mean a deposit account at a
depository institution that is held by or offered to a customer. It
includes time, demand, savings, and negotiable order of withdrawal
accounts. The term does not include a fiduciary account as to which the
insured depository institution does not, in the normal course of
business, keep records of beneficial owners of the deposits in the
account.
(2) New Account shall mean any deposit account at an insured
depository institution to which the insured depository institution
assigns a unique identifier that serves to distinguish the account from
other, existing accounts at the depository institution.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 7th day of February, 2011.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3085 Filed 2-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P