Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision, 7592-7593 [2011-3026]
Download as PDF
7592
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request reinstatement and clearance
for this collection. In accordance with
the requirement of Section 3506 (c)(2)
(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, we are providing opportunity for
public comment on this action. After
obtaining and considering public
comment, NSF will prepare the
submission requesting OMB clearance
of this collection for no longer than
three years.
Comments are invited on (a) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information of
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by April 11, 2011, to be
assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by
e-mail to splimpton@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or
send e-mail to splimpton@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title of
Collection: Informal Science Education
(ISE) Program.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Evaluation for the National Science
Foundation
OMB Number: 3145–0158.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable.
Type of request: Reinstatement.
Abstract:
Informal Science Education (ISE) is an
NSF program that supports innovation
in anywhere, anytime, lifelong learning,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Feb 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
through investments in research,
development, infrastructure, and
capacity-building for science,
technology, engineering and
mathematics (STEM) learning outside
formal school settings. Informal science
experiences can serve to spark young
people’s interest in pursuing careers in
STEM fields as well as to improve
public engagement with STEM,
contributing to science learning for most
citizens. For over 40 years, NSF ISE
programming has supported efforts to
engage the public in science and science
learning. The program is charged with
advancing public understanding of
STEM content and processes and
promoting engagement with informal
STEM education experiences. Since the
last major evaluation of NSF ISE
(COSMOS Corporation, 1998), ISE has
taken strategic steps to support the
growing maturation of the informal
science field, producing seminal
documents such as Framework for
Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science
Education Projects (Friedman, 2008)
and Learning Science in Informal
Environments (NRC, 2009), and
supporting field-wide resources such as
the InformalScience.org Web site and
the Center for the Advancement of
Informal Science Education (CAISE).
The program’s grant solicitations have
reflected a growing professionalization
for the informal science community
with new expectations for rigorous
research on implementation and
outcomes.
The ISE program evaluation will
characterize changes in the informal
science arena since 1999 and delineate
the role in those changes of the NSF ISE
program between 1999 and the present.
The evaluation will do so by analyzing
NSF ISE-funded projects over that time
frame, attending in particular to the
impact on informal science
infrastructure, the rigor of individual
project evaluations, the learning
outcomes for diverse audiences, and the
features of exemplary projects. The ISE
program evaluation will employ a
mixed-method approach including
extensive document review of
solicitations, proposals, reports, and
published literature; qualitative and
quantitative analyses of surveys and
interviews with researchers and
practitioners in the field; and case
studies of influential projects,
initiatives, and ideas. This information
collection request will include a survey
instrument for principal investigators of
past and current ISE projects, one
survey instrument for project evaluators,
and protocols for follow-up interviews
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with a sample of principal investigators
and evaluators.
Estimate of Burden:
Respondents: Individuals.
Frequency: One time.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1010.
Estimated Burden Hours on
Respondents: 550.
Dated: February 7, 2011.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2011–2976 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–271; License No. DPR–28;
NRC–2010–0191]
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC
and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Notice of Issuance of Director’s
Decision
Notice is hereby given that the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, has issued a Director’s
Decision with regard to a petition dated
April 19, 2010, filed by Congressman
Paul W. Hodes, U.S. House of
Representatives, hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Petitioner.’’ The petition was
supplemented by letters dated May 14
and June 16, 2010. The petition
concerns the operation of the Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Station (Vermont
Yankee).
The petition requested that the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
not allow Vermont Yankee, operated by
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Entergy or the licensee), to restart in
May 2010, after its scheduled refueling
outage, until the completion of all
environmental remediation work and
relevant reports on leaking tritium at the
plant. Specifically, the petition asked
the NRC to prevent Vermont Yankee
from resuming power production until
the following efforts have been
completed to the Commission’s
satisfaction: (1) The tritiated
groundwater remediation process; (2)
the soil remediation process scheduled
to take place during the refueling
outage, to remove soil containing
tritium and radioactive isotopes of
cesium, manganese, zinc, and cobalt; (3)
Entergy’s root cause analysis; and (4) the
Commission’s review of the documents
presented by Entergy as a result of the
Commission’s demand for information
imposed on the licensee on March 1,
2010.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2011 / Notices
The petition raises concerns
originating from the licensee’s report to
the NRC on January 7, 2010, that water
samples taken from a monitoring well
on site at Vermont Yankee showed
tritium levels above background.
Tritium is another name for the
radioactive nuclide hydrogen-3. Tritium
occurs naturally in the environment
because of cosmic ray interactions and
is also produced by nuclear reactor
operations. Tritium is chemically
identical to normal hydrogen (hydrogen1), and like normal hydrogen tends to
combine with oxygen to form water,
which is referred to as tritiated water.
The detection of tritiated water in the
monitoring well indicated there was
abnormal leakage from the nuclear
plant. The licensee later identified a
leak from underground pipe in the
Advanced Off-Gas system as the source
of the leak.
This petition was assigned to the
NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation (NRR) for review. NRR’s
Petition Review Board (PRB) met on
May 3, 2010, and made an initial
recommendation to accept this petition
for review. The NRC communicated this
decision to the Petitioner’s staff, who
told the PRB that the Petitioner did not
desire to address the PRB. The PRB’s
final recommendation was to accept the
petition for review. By letter dated May
20, 2010, Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Accession No. ML101310049,
the NRC informed the Petitioner of the
PRB’s recommendation and also stated
that the NRC did not find cause to
prohibit the restart of Vermont Yankee.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed
Director’s Decision to the Petitioner for
comment on November 18, 2010, and to
the licensee for comment on November
29, 2010. The Petitioner did not provide
any comments and the licensee
provided minor comments. The
licensee’s comments have been
addressed in the Director’s Decision.
The NRR staff has determined that the
activities requested by the Petitioner
have been completed, with the
exception of preventing the restart of
Vermont Yankee. Therefore, the Director
of NRR concludes that the petition has
been granted in part and denied in part.
The reasons for this decision are
explained in the Director’s Decision
(DD–11–01) pursuant to Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
2.206, ‘‘Requests for action under this
subpart.’’
Copies of the petition, ADAMS
Accession No. ML101120663, and the
Director’s Decision, ADAMS Accession
No. ML110060072, are available for
inspection at the Commission’s Public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Feb 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
Document Room (PDR) at One White
Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and from the
NRC’s ADAMS Public Electronic
Reading Room on the NRC Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. The supplemental letters
are under ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML101370031 and ML101720485. NRC
Management Directive 8.11, ‘‘Review
Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions,’’
ADAMS Accession No. ML041770328,
describes the petition review process.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who have problems in
accessing the documents in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209 or
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
A copy of the Director’s Decision will
be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission’s
review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206
of the Commission’s regulations. As
provided for by this regulation, the
Director’s Decision will constitute the
final action of the Commission 25 days
after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion,
institutes a review of the Director’s
Decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day
of January 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011–3026 Filed 2–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
President’s Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology; Notice of
Meeting: Partially Closed Meeting of
the President’s Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology
ACTION:
Public notice.
This notice sets forth the
schedule and summary agenda for a
partially closed meeting of the
President’s Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology (PCAST), and
describes the functions of the Council.
Notice of this meeting is required under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), 5 U.S.C., App.
DATE: March 8, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Marriott Metro Center, 775 12th
Street NW., Junior Ballroom,
Washington, DC.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7593
Type of Meeting: Open and Closed.
Proposed Schedule and Agenda: The
President’s Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology (PCAST) is
scheduled to meet in open session on
March 8, 2011 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
with a lunch break from 12:15 p.m. to
2 p.m.
Open Portion of Meeting: During this
open meeting, PCAST is tentatively
scheduled to hear presentations on
defense nuclear nonproliferation
research and the Federal statistical
system. Representatives from the
Department of Health and Human
Services will update PCAST on the
implementation status of
recommendations PCAST made in its
reports on influenza. PCAST members
will also discuss reports they are
developing on the topics of advanced
manufacturing; biodiversity
preservation and ecosystem
sustainability; and the first two years of
undergraduate science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics
education. Additional information and
the agenda will be posted at the PCAST
Web site at: https://whitehouse.gov/ostp/
pcast.
Closed Portion of the Meeting: PCAST
may hold a closed meeting of
approximately 1 hour with the President
on March 8, 2011, which must take
place in the White House for the
President’s scheduling convenience and
to maintain Secret Service protection.
This meeting will be closed to the
public because such portion of the
meeting is likely to disclose matters that
are to be kept secret in the interest of
national defense or foreign policy under
5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1). The precise date
and time of this potential meeting has
not yet been determined.
Public Comments: It is the policy of
the PCAST to accept written public
comments of any length, and to
accommodate oral public comments
whenever possible. The PCAST expects
that public statements presented at its
meetings will not be repetitive of
previously submitted oral or written
statements.
The public comment period for this
meeting will take place on March 8,
2011 at a time specified in the meeting
agenda posted on the PCAST Web site
at https://whitehouse.gov/ostp/pcast.
This public comment period is designed
only for substantive commentary on
PCAST’s work, not for business
marketing purposes.
Oral Comments: To be considered for
the public speaker list at the meeting,
interested parties should register to
speak at https://whitehouse.gov/ostp/
pcast, no later than 12 p.m. Eastern
Time on Tuesday, March 1, 2011. Phone
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7592-7593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3026]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-271; License No. DPR-28; NRC-2010-0191]
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Director's Decision
Notice is hereby given that the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, has issued a Director's Decision with regard to a petition
dated April 19, 2010, filed by Congressman Paul W. Hodes, U.S. House of
Representatives, hereinafter referred to as the ``Petitioner.'' The
petition was supplemented by letters dated May 14 and June 16, 2010.
The petition concerns the operation of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Station (Vermont Yankee).
The petition requested that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
not allow Vermont Yankee, operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Entergy or the licensee), to restart in May 2010, after its scheduled
refueling outage, until the completion of all environmental remediation
work and relevant reports on leaking tritium at the plant.
Specifically, the petition asked the NRC to prevent Vermont Yankee from
resuming power production until the following efforts have been
completed to the Commission's satisfaction: (1) The tritiated
groundwater remediation process; (2) the soil remediation process
scheduled to take place during the refueling outage, to remove soil
containing tritium and radioactive isotopes of cesium, manganese, zinc,
and cobalt; (3) Entergy's root cause analysis; and (4) the Commission's
review of the documents presented by Entergy as a result of the
Commission's demand for information imposed on the licensee on March 1,
2010.
[[Page 7593]]
The petition raises concerns originating from the licensee's report
to the NRC on January 7, 2010, that water samples taken from a
monitoring well on site at Vermont Yankee showed tritium levels above
background. Tritium is another name for the radioactive nuclide
hydrogen-3. Tritium occurs naturally in the environment because of
cosmic ray interactions and is also produced by nuclear reactor
operations. Tritium is chemically identical to normal hydrogen
(hydrogen-1), and like normal hydrogen tends to combine with oxygen to
form water, which is referred to as tritiated water. The detection of
tritiated water in the monitoring well indicated there was abnormal
leakage from the nuclear plant. The licensee later identified a leak
from underground pipe in the Advanced Off-Gas system as the source of
the leak.
This petition was assigned to the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation (NRR) for review. NRR's Petition Review Board (PRB) met on
May 3, 2010, and made an initial recommendation to accept this petition
for review. The NRC communicated this decision to the Petitioner's
staff, who told the PRB that the Petitioner did not desire to address
the PRB. The PRB's final recommendation was to accept the petition for
review. By letter dated May 20, 2010, Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML101310049, the NRC informed
the Petitioner of the PRB's recommendation and also stated that the NRC
did not find cause to prohibit the restart of Vermont Yankee.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed Director's Decision to the
Petitioner for comment on November 18, 2010, and to the licensee for
comment on November 29, 2010. The Petitioner did not provide any
comments and the licensee provided minor comments. The licensee's
comments have been addressed in the Director's Decision.
The NRR staff has determined that the activities requested by the
Petitioner have been completed, with the exception of preventing the
restart of Vermont Yankee. Therefore, the Director of NRR concludes
that the petition has been granted in part and denied in part. The
reasons for this decision are explained in the Director's Decision (DD-
11-01) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
2.206, ``Requests for action under this subpart.''
Copies of the petition, ADAMS Accession No. ML101120663, and the
Director's Decision, ADAMS Accession No. ML110060072, are available for
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room (PDR) at One White
Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
floor), Rockville, Maryland, and from the NRC's ADAMS Public Electronic
Reading Room on the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The supplemental letters are under ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML101370031 and ML101720485. NRC Management Directive 8.11, ``Review
Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions,'' ADAMS Accession No. ML041770328,
describes the petition review process. Persons who do not have access
to ADAMS or who have problems in accessing the documents in ADAMS
should contact the NRC PDR reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-
4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
A copy of the Director's Decision will be filed with the Secretary
of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR
2.206 of the Commission's regulations. As provided for by this
regulation, the Director's Decision will constitute the final action of
the Commission 25 days after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Director's
Decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of January 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-3026 Filed 2-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P