Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree, 6826-6827 [2011-2695]
Download as PDF
6826
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
OSM has identified three possible
alternatives that the combined PED/EIS
would evaluate:
• Alternative 1—Designate the entire
petition area as unsuitable for surface
coal mining operations.
• Alternative 2—Not designate any of
the area as unsuitable for surface coal
mining operations.
• Alternative 3—Designate parts of
the petition area as unsuitable for all or
certain types of surface coal mining
operations.
A scoping comment period is intended
to raise the relevant issues to be
addressed by the combined document.
OSM seeks public comments in relation
to the scope of issues to be addressed by
the impact evaluation, including
impacts and alternatives that should be
addressed. Written comments should be
specific and confined to issues pertinent
to the petition. The public comments
received during the scoping period will
assist OSM in making decisions on the
petition evaluation and in preparing the
PED/EIS. OSM believes that the
proposed action is a major Federal
action that may significantly affect the
quality of the human environment and
may require the preparation of an EIS.
OSM additionally gives notice here that
should information or analyses show
that the proposed action does not
require an EIS, we will terminate the
EIS process through an appropriate
notice in the Federal Register, prepare
an environmental assessment, and
continue processing of the petition
under the regulations at 30 CFR parts
764 and 942.
Dated: January 31, 2011.
Sterling Rideout,
Assistant Director, Program Support.
[FR Doc. 2011–2765 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
[Investigation No. 337–TA–713]
Certain Display Devices Including
Digital Televisions and Monitors;
Notice of Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate
the Investigation in Its Entirety Based
on a Settlement Agreement;
Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 25) granting a joint
motion to terminate the investigation in
its entirety based on a settlement
agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 21, 2010, based on a complaint
filed by Sony Corporation of Japan
(‘‘Sony’’). 75 FR 20860–1. The
complaint, as amended and
supplemented, alleges violations of
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain digital display devices including
digital televisions and monitors by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,434,626; 5,751,373;
6,111,614; 5,583,577; 5,684,542;
5,731,847; 6,661,472; 6,816,131; Re
38,055; and Re 40,468. The complaint
further alleges the existence of a
domestic industry. The Commission’s
notice of investigation named various
respondents including Chimei Innolux
Corporation and Innolux Corporation
(collectively ‘‘CMI’’); TPV Technology
Limited; Top Victory Electronics
(Taiwan) Co.; TPV International (USA),
Inc.; Envision Peripherals, Inc.; Top
Victory Investments Ltd.; TPV
Electronics (Fujian) Co. Ltd.; TPV
Display Technology (Wuhan) Co.; TPV
Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
(collectively ‘‘TPV respondents’’). On
September 24, 2010, the Commission
determined not to review an ID granting
Sony’s motion to terminate the TPV
respondents based on a settlement
agreement.
On December 16, 2010, Sony and
respondents CMI filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation based on a
settlement agreement as embodied in a
memorandum of understanding. On
December 27, 2010, the Commission
investigative attorney filed a response
supporting the motion.
On January 3, 2011, the ALJ issued
the subject ID granting the joint motion
to terminate the investigation in its
entirety pursuant to Commission Rule
210.21(b). No petitions for review of the
subject ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42).
Issued: February 2, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2011–2683 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. Rutherford Oil
Corporation, et al., No. 3:08-cv-231, was
lodged with the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas
on February 2, 2011.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Rutherford Oil
Corporation, Brown Water Marine
Service, Inc., Caillou Island Towing
Company, Inc., Inland Marine
Management Corporation, and Triple S
Marine, LLC, pursuant to 33 U.S.C.
1311(a) and 33 U.S.C. 403, to obtain
injunctive relief from and impose civil
penalties against the Defendants for
violating the Clean Water Act by
discharging pollutants without a permit
into waters of the United States. The
proposed Consent Decree resolves these
allegations by requiring the Defendants
to conduct a restoration project and to
pay a civil penalty. The Department of
Justice will accept written comments
relating to this proposed Consent Decree
for thirty (30) days from the date of
publication of this Notice. Please
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
address comments to T. Monique Jones,
Environmental Defense Section, United
States Department of Justice, P.O. Box
23986, Washington DC 20026 and refer
to United States v. Rutherford Oil
Corporation, DJ # 90–5–1–1–18340.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas, 515 Rusk Avenue,
Houston TX 77002. In addition, the
proposed Consent Decree may be
viewed at https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environment &
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–2695 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection,
Comments Requested
60-day Notice of Information
Collection for Review: Final Disposition
Report (R–84).
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Department of Justice, Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal
Justice Information Services (CJIS)
Division will be submitting the
following information collection
renewal to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review in
accordance with established review
procedures of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The information collection
is published to obtain comments from
the public and affected agencies.
Comments are encouraged and will be
accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until April 11,
2011. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
All comments, suggestions, or
questions regarding additional
information, to include obtaining a copy
of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to Rachel K. Hurst,
Management Program Analyst, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice
Information Services Division (CJIS),
Biometric Services Section, Support
Services Unit, Module E–1, 1000 Custer
Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia
26306; or by facsimile to (304) 625–
5392.
To ensure that comments on the
information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer, Fax: 202
395–7285, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number [1121–0234]. Also
include the DOJ docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Comments
should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have a
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
propose collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques of
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of information collection:
Approval of existing collection in use
without an OMB control number.
(2) The title of the form/collection:
Final Disposition Report.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
R–84; Criminal Justice Information
Services Division, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, State,
Federal and Tribal law enforcement
agencies. This collection is needed to
report completion of an arrest record.
Acceptable data is stored as part of the
Integrated Automated Fingerprint
Identification System (IAFIS) of the FBI.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There are approximately
71,757 agencies as respondents at five
minutes per Final Disposition Report
completed.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6827
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with this
collection: There are approximately
54,167 annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Justice Management
Division, United States Department of
Justice, Two Constitution Square, 145 N
Street, NE., Suite 2E–502, Washington,
DC 20530.
Dated: February 2, 2011.
Lynn Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United
States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2011–2672 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
Meetings; Sunshine Act; Public
Announcement Pursuant to the
Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub.
L. 94–409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]
Department of
Justice, United States Parole
Commission.
DATE AND TIME: 11:30 a.m., Thursday,
February 10, 2011.
PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550
Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy
Chase, Maryland 20815.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS CONSIDERED: The following
matter will be considered during the
closed meeting:
Consideration of four original
jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 CFR
2.27 and one original jurisdiction case
pursuant to 28 CFR 2.17.
AGENCY CONTACT: Patricia W. Moore,
Staff Assistant to the Chairman, United
States Parole Commission, (301) 492–
5933.
AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:
Dated: February 1, 2011.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–2671 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–31–M
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
Public Availability of the National
Aeronautic and Space Administration
FY 2010 Service Contract Inventory
National Aeronautic and Space
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of public availability of
FY 2010 Service Contract Inventories.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6826-6827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2695]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree
In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
Rutherford Oil Corporation, et al., No. 3:08-cv-231, was lodged with
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on
February 2, 2011.
This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Rutherford Oil Corporation, Brown Water Marine
Service, Inc., Caillou Island Towing Company, Inc., Inland Marine
Management Corporation, and Triple S Marine, LLC, pursuant to 33 U.S.C.
1311(a) and 33 U.S.C. 403, to obtain injunctive relief from and impose
civil penalties against the Defendants for violating the Clean Water
Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the
United States. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations
by requiring the Defendants to conduct a restoration project and to pay
a civil penalty. The Department of Justice will accept written comments
relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the
date of publication of this Notice. Please
[[Page 6827]]
address comments to T. Monique Jones, Environmental Defense Section,
United States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 23986, Washington DC
20026 and refer to United States v. Rutherford Oil Corporation, DJ
90-5-1-1-18340.
The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office,
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 515
Rusk Avenue, Houston TX 77002. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree
may be viewed at https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-2695 Filed 2-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P