Safety Zone; Underwater Hazard, Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn, NY, 6728-6730 [2011-2689]
Download as PDF
6728
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
The text of the proposed amendments
and additional details about how to
submit written and oral testimony are
available on the Commission’s Web site,
drbc.net.
Dated: February 1, 2011.
John F. Calkin,
Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2011–2677 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360–01–P
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LTJG Eunice James,
Coast Guard; telephone (718) 354–4163,
e-mail Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–1091]
RIN 1625–AA00
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Safety Zone; Underwater Hazard,
Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a permanent safety zone
within the waters of Gravesend Bay,
Brooklyn, New York. This proposed
safety zone is necessary to provide for
the protection of the maritime public
and safety of navigation from recently
discovered underwater explosive
hazards in Gravesend Bay. This action
is intended to restrict unauthorized
persons and vessels from traveling
through or conducting underwater
activities within a portion of Gravesend
Bay until recently discovered military
munitions are rendered safe and
removed from the area. Entry into this
zone would be prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
New York or the designated on-scene
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before March 10, 2011. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before February 23,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–1091 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
Jkt 223001
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–1091),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–1091’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
1091’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before February 23, 2011
using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why
you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
In response to media reports of
military munitions found in Gravesend
Bay by civilian divers, U.S. Navy
Explosive Ordnance Disposal divers
from Naval Weapons Station Earle
conducted underwater surveys and
confirmed the location of munitions on
the bottom of Gravesend Bay. The
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
munitions consist of approximately
1500 rounds of 20mm ammunition, one
3-inch diameter projectile and two
cartridge casings. The Captain of the
Port (COTP) New York has established
a temporary safety zone under docket
number USCG–2010–1126 as an interim
measure while this long-term
rulemaking process is pursued.
In the interest of public safety, the
U.S. Navy has requested that the Coast
Guard limit access to the location in
Gravesend Bay where the munitions are
located until the ordnance can be
rendered safe and removed.
This safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of mariners, vessels,
and civilian divers from the potential
hazards associated with unexploded
military munitions.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP New York proposes to
establish a safety zone around the
location of an unexploded munitions
site to ensure the safety of mariners and
vessels transiting near the location of
the ordnance as well as divers intending
to dive in the area.
The proposed safety zone will
encompass all waters of Gravesend Bay
within 110-yard radius of position
40°36′30″ N, 074°02′14″ W (NAD 83),
approximately 70-yards southeast of the
Verrazano Bridge Brooklyn tower.
Entry into the proposed safety zone by
any person or vessel will be prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
COTP New York, or the designated onscene representative. Persons desiring to
enter the safety zone may request
permission to enter from the Coast
Guard COTP via VHF Channel 16 or by
contacting the Sector New York
Command Center at (718) 354–4353.
The Coast Guard advises that entry
into, transiting, diving, dredging,
dumping, fishing, trawling, conducting
salvage operations, remaining within or
anchoring in this safety zone will be
prohibited unless authorized by the
COTP New York or the designated onscene representative.
The ‘‘designated on-scene
representative’’ is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been designated by the COTP
New York to act on her behalf.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this proposed rule restricts
access to a small portion of Gravesend
Bay until military munitions are
rendered safe and removed, the effect of
this regulation would not be significant
due to the following reasons: the safety
zone would cover only a small portion
of the navigable waters within
Gravesend Bay. Vessels would be able to
safely transit around the area. In
addition, vessels may be authorized to
enter the zone with permission of the
COTP New York.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit, fish, dive, or
anchor in a portion of Gravesend Bay.
This proposed safety zone would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety
zone would limit access to a relatively
small portion of the waterway. Vessel
traffic could safely transit around the
safety zone. Before the activation of the
zone, we would issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the waterway in the vicinity of
Gravesend Bay.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6729
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or e-mail LTJG
Eunice James, Coast Guard Sector New
York Waterways Management Division;
telephone 718–354–4163, e-mail
Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
6730
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone which can be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Commandant Instruction.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
this safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
New York or the designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘designated on-scene
representative’’ is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port New York.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone may
contact the Captain of the Port New
York or his designated representative at
the Coast Guard Sector New York
Command Center via VHF Channel 16
or by phone at (718) 354–4353 to
request permission.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port New
York or the on-scene representative.
Dated: January 14, 2011.
L.L. Fagan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2011–2689 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Fish and Wildlife Service
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.171 to read as follows:
§ 165.171 Safety Zone; Underwater Hazard,
Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of
Gravesend Bay within a 110-yard radius
of a point in position 40°36′30″ N,
074°02′14″ W (NAD 83), approximately
70-yards southeast of the Verrazano
Bridge Brooklyn tower.
(b) Effective date. This safety zone is
effective on July 01, 2011, twenty-four
hours a day, seven days a week.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulation contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(2) Entry into, transiting, diving,
dredging, dumping, fishing, trawling,
conducting salvage operations,
remaining within or anchoring within
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2010–0066;
[70101–1261–0000L6]
RIN 1018–AX33
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska—2012–13
and 2013–14 Subsistence Taking of
Wildlife Regulations
Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCIES:
This proposed rule would
establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits,
methods and means related to taking of
wildlife for subsistence uses during the
2012–2013 and 2013–2014 regulatory
years. The Federal Subsistence Board is
on a schedule of completing the process
of revising subsistence taking of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and
subsistence taking of fish and shellfish
regulations in odd-numbered years;
public proposal and review processes
take place during the preceding year.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6728-6730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2689]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-1091]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Underwater Hazard, Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a permanent safety zone
within the waters of Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn, New York. This proposed
safety zone is necessary to provide for the protection of the maritime
public and safety of navigation from recently discovered underwater
explosive hazards in Gravesend Bay. This action is intended to restrict
unauthorized persons and vessels from traveling through or conducting
underwater activities within a portion of Gravesend Bay until recently
discovered military munitions are rendered safe and removed from the
area. Entry into this zone would be prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port New York or the designated on-scene representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 10, 2011. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before February 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-1091 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail LTJG Eunice James, Coast Guard; telephone (718)
354-4163, e-mail Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-1091), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-1091'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-1091'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before February 23, 2011 using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a
later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
In response to media reports of military munitions found in
Gravesend Bay by civilian divers, U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal
divers from Naval Weapons Station Earle conducted underwater surveys
and confirmed the location of munitions on the bottom of Gravesend Bay.
The
[[Page 6729]]
munitions consist of approximately 1500 rounds of 20mm ammunition, one
3-inch diameter projectile and two cartridge casings. The Captain of
the Port (COTP) New York has established a temporary safety zone under
docket number USCG-2010-1126 as an interim measure while this long-term
rulemaking process is pursued.
In the interest of public safety, the U.S. Navy has requested that
the Coast Guard limit access to the location in Gravesend Bay where the
munitions are located until the ordnance can be rendered safe and
removed.
This safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of mariners,
vessels, and civilian divers from the potential hazards associated with
unexploded military munitions.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP New York proposes to establish a safety zone around the
location of an unexploded munitions site to ensure the safety of
mariners and vessels transiting near the location of the ordnance as
well as divers intending to dive in the area.
The proposed safety zone will encompass all waters of Gravesend Bay
within 110-yard radius of position 40[deg]36'30'' N, 074[deg]02'14'' W
(NAD 83), approximately 70-yards southeast of the Verrazano Bridge
Brooklyn tower.
Entry into the proposed safety zone by any person or vessel will be
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the COTP New York, or the
designated on-scene representative. Persons desiring to enter the
safety zone may request permission to enter from the Coast Guard COTP
via VHF Channel 16 or by contacting the Sector New York Command Center
at (718) 354-4353.
The Coast Guard advises that entry into, transiting, diving,
dredging, dumping, fishing, trawling, conducting salvage operations,
remaining within or anchoring in this safety zone will be prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP New York or the designated on-scene
representative.
The ``designated on-scene representative'' is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the
COTP New York to act on her behalf.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
Although this proposed rule restricts access to a small portion of
Gravesend Bay until military munitions are rendered safe and removed,
the effect of this regulation would not be significant due to the
following reasons: the safety zone would cover only a small portion of
the navigable waters within Gravesend Bay. Vessels would be able to
safely transit around the area. In addition, vessels may be authorized
to enter the zone with permission of the COTP New York.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit, fish, dive, or anchor in a portion of Gravesend Bay.
This proposed safety zone would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons. This safety zone would limit access to a relatively small
portion of the waterway. Vessel traffic could safely transit around the
safety zone. Before the activation of the zone, we would issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of the waterway in the vicinity of
Gravesend Bay.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or e-mail LTJG Eunice James, Coast
Guard Sector New York Waterways Management Division; telephone 718-354-
4163, e-mail Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
[[Page 6730]]
Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone which can be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.171 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.171 Safety Zone; Underwater Hazard, Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn,
NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of Gravesend Bay within a 110-yard radius of a point in position
40[deg]36'30'' N, 074[deg]02'14'' W (NAD 83), approximately 70-yards
southeast of the Verrazano Bridge Brooklyn tower.
(b) Effective date. This safety zone is effective on July 01, 2011,
twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulation contained in 33 CFR
165.23 apply.
(2) Entry into, transiting, diving, dredging, dumping, fishing,
trawling, conducting salvage operations, remaining within or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port New York or the designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ``designated on-scene representative'' is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port New York.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone may contact the Captain of the Port New York or his designated
representative at the Coast Guard Sector New York Command Center via
VHF Channel 16 or by phone at (718) 354-4353 to request permission.
(5) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port New York or the on-scene representative.
Dated: January 14, 2011.
L.L. Fagan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2011-2689 Filed 2-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P