Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska-2012-13 and 2013-14 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations, 6730-6734 [2011-2679]
Download as PDF
6730
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone which can be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Commandant Instruction.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
this safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
New York or the designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘designated on-scene
representative’’ is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port New York.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone may
contact the Captain of the Port New
York or his designated representative at
the Coast Guard Sector New York
Command Center via VHF Channel 16
or by phone at (718) 354–4353 to
request permission.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port New
York or the on-scene representative.
Dated: January 14, 2011.
L.L. Fagan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2011–2689 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Fish and Wildlife Service
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.171 to read as follows:
§ 165.171 Safety Zone; Underwater Hazard,
Gravesend Bay, Brooklyn, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of
Gravesend Bay within a 110-yard radius
of a point in position 40°36′30″ N,
074°02′14″ W (NAD 83), approximately
70-yards southeast of the Verrazano
Bridge Brooklyn tower.
(b) Effective date. This safety zone is
effective on July 01, 2011, twenty-four
hours a day, seven days a week.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulation contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(2) Entry into, transiting, diving,
dredging, dumping, fishing, trawling,
conducting salvage operations,
remaining within or anchoring within
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2010–0066;
[70101–1261–0000L6]
RIN 1018–AX33
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska—2012–13
and 2013–14 Subsistence Taking of
Wildlife Regulations
Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCIES:
This proposed rule would
establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits,
methods and means related to taking of
wildlife for subsistence uses during the
2012–2013 and 2013–2014 regulatory
years. The Federal Subsistence Board is
on a schedule of completing the process
of revising subsistence taking of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and
subsistence taking of fish and shellfish
regulations in odd-numbered years;
public proposal and review processes
take place during the preceding year.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
The Board also addresses customary and
traditional use determinations during
the applicable cycle. When final, the
resulting rulemaking will replace the
existing subsistence wildlife taking
regulations. This rule would also amend
the general regulations on subsistence
taking of fish and wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal
Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
will hold public meetings to receive
comments and make proposals to
change this proposed rule on several
dates between February 15 and March
24, 2011, and then hold another round
of public meetings to discuss and
receive comments on the proposals, and
make recommendations on the
proposals to the Federal Subsistence
Board, on several dates between August
23 and October 13, 2011. The Board will
discuss and evaluate proposed
regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, in January
2012. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
for specific information on dates and
locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and
proposals to change this proposed rule
must be received or postmarked by
March 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The
Federal Subsistence Board and the
Regional Advisory Councils’ public
meetings will be held at various
locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific information on
dates and locations of the public
meetings.
Public comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
FWS–R7–SM–2010–0066, which is the
docket number for this rulemaking.
• By hard copy: U.S. mail or handdelivery to: USFWS, Office of
Subsistence Management, 1011 East
Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503–
6199, or hand delivery to the Designated
Federal Official attending any of the
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council public meetings. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on locations of
the public meetings.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Review Process section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786–
3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest
System lands, contact Steve Kessler,
Regional Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Region;
(907) 743–9461 or skessler@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
jointly implement the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. This
program provides a preference for take
of fish and wildlife resources for
subsistence uses on Federal public
lands and waters in Alaska. The
Secretaries published temporary
regulations to carry out this program in
the Federal Register on June 29, 1990
(55 FR 27114), and final regulations
were published in the Federal Register
on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The
Program has subsequently amended
these regulations a number of times.
Because this program is a joint effort
between Interior and Agriculture, these
regulations are located in two titles of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR):
Title 36, ‘‘Parks, Forests, and Public
Property,’’ and Title 50, ‘‘Wildlife and
Fisheries,’’ at 36 CFR 242.1–28 and 50
CFR 100.1–28, respectively. The
regulations contain subparts as follows:
Subpart A, General Provisions; Subpart
B, Program Structure; Subpart C, Board
Determinations; and Subpart D,
Subsistence Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these
regulations, the Secretaries established a
Federal Subsistence Board to administer
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The Board is currently made
up of:
• A Chair appointed by the Secretary
of the Interior with concurrence of the
Secretary of Agriculture;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
National Park Service;
• The Alaska State Director, U.S.
Bureau of Land Management;
• The Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and
• The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S.
Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies
participate in the development of
regulations for subparts C and D, which,
among other things, set forth program
eligibility and specific harvest seasons
and limits.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6731
In administering the program, the
Secretaries divided Alaska into 10
subsistence resource regions, each of
which is represented by a Regional
Advisory Council. The Regional
Advisory Councils provide a forum for
rural residents with personal knowledge
of local conditions and resource
requirements to have a meaningful role
in the subsistence management of fish
and wildlife on Federal public lands in
Alaska. The Regional Advisory Council
members represent varied geographical,
cultural, and user interests within each
region.
Public Review Process—Comments,
Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Regional Advisory Councils have
a substantial role in reviewing this
proposed rule and making
recommendations for the final rule. The
Federal Subsistence Board, through the
Regional Advisory Councils, will hold
meetings on this proposed rule at the
following locations in Alaska, on the
following dates:
Region 1—Southeast Regional Council,
Sitka, March 22, 2011
Region 2—Southcentral Regional
Council, Anchorage, March 16, 2011
Region 3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional
Council, Kodiak, February 16, 2011
Region 4—Bristol Bay Regional Council,
Naknek, March 9, 2011
Region 5—Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta
Regional Council, Mtn. Village,
February 23, 2011
Region 6—Western Interior Regional
Council, Galena, March 1, 2011
Region 7—Seward Peninsula Regional
Council, Nome, February 15, 2011
Region 8—Northwest Arctic Regional
Council, Kotzebue, March 18, 2011
Region 9—Eastern Interior Regional
Council, Fairbanks, March 3, 2011
Region 10—North Slope Regional
Council, Barrow, March 7, 2011
During April 2011, the written
proposals to change the subpart D, take
of wildlife regulations and subpart C,
customary and traditional use
determinations, will be compiled and
distributed for public review. During the
30-day public comment period, which is
presently scheduled to end on May 15,
2011, written public comments will be
accepted on the distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional
Advisory Councils, will hold a second
series of meetings in August through
October 2011, to receive comments on
specific proposals and to develop
recommendations to the Board at the
following locations in Alaska, on the
following dates:
Region 1—Southeast Regional Council,
Wrangell, September 27, 2011
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
6732
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Region 2—Southcentral Regional
Council, Cantwell, October 3, 2011
Region 3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional
Council, Cold Bay, September 7, 2011
Region 4—Bristol Bay Regional Council,
Dillingham, October 12, 2011
Region 5—Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta
Regional Council, TBA, September 29,
2011
Region 6—Western Interior Regional
Council, Aniak, October 4, 2011
Region 7—Seward Peninsula Regional
Council, Nome, September 21, 2011
Region 8—Northwest Arctic Regional
Council, TBA, August 23, 2011
Region 9—Eastern Interior Regional
Council, Tanana, October 11, 2011
Region 10—North Slope Regional
Council, TBA, August 23, 2011
A notice will be published of specific
dates, times, and meeting locations in
local and statewide newspapers prior to
both series of meetings. Locations and
dates may change based on weather or
local circumstances. The amount of
work on each Regional Advisory
Council’s agenda determines the length
of each Regional Advisory Council
meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate
proposed changes to the subsistence
management regulations during a public
meeting scheduled to be held in
Anchorage, AK, in January 2012. The
Regional Advisory Council Chairs, or
their designated representatives, will
present their respective Councils’
recommendations at the Board meeting.
Additional oral testimony may be
provided on specific proposals before
the Board at that time. At that public
meeting, the Board will deliberate and
take final action on proposals received
that request changes to this proposed
rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify the
general fish and wildlife regulations,
wildlife harvest regulations, and
customary and traditional use
determinations must include the
following information:
a. Name, address, and telephone
number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph
designation in this proposed rule for
which changes are suggested, if
applicable;
c. A description of the regulatory
change(s) desired;
d. A statement explaining why each
change is necessary;
e. Proposed wording changes; and
f. Any additional information that you
believe will help the Board in
evaluating the proposed change.
The Board immediately rejects
proposals that fail to include the above
information, or proposals that are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
beyond the scope of authorities in
§ ___.24, subpart C (the regulations
governing customary and traditional use
determinations), and §§ ___.25 and
___.26, subpart D (the general and
specific regulations governing the
subsistence take of wildlife). During the
January 2012 meeting, the Board may
defer review and action on some
proposals to allow time for cooperative
planning efforts, or to acquire additional
needed information. The Board may
elect to defer taking action on any given
proposal if the workload of staff,
Regional Advisory Councils, or the
Board becomes excessive. These
deferrals may be based on
recommendations by the affected
Regional Advisory Council(s) or staff
members, or on the basis of the Board’s
intention to do least harm to the
subsistence user and the resource
involved. A proponent of a proposal
may withdraw the proposal provided it
has not been presented to a Regional
Advisory Council for action. The Board
may consider and act on alternatives
that address the intent of a proposal
while differing in approach.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,’’ the
Federal officials that have been
delegated authority by the Secretaries
are committed to honoring the unique
government-to-government political
relationship that exists between the
Federal Government and Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes (Tribes) as
listed in 75 FR 60810 (October 1, 2010).
Consultation with Alaska Native
corporations is based on Public Law
108–199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004,
118 Stat. 452, as amended by Public
Law 108–447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518,
Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267, which
provides that: ‘‘The Director of the
Office of Management and Budget and
all Federal agencies shall hereafter
consult with Alaska Native corporations
on the same basis as Indian tribes under
Executive Order No. 13175.’’
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not provide
rights to Tribes for the subsistence
taking of wildlife, fish, and shellfish.
However, because tribal members are
affected by subsistence fishing, hunting,
and trapping regulations, the
Secretaries, through the Board, will
provide Federally recognized Tribes and
Alaska Native corporations an
opportunity to consult on this rule.
The Board will engage in outreach
efforts for this rule, including a
notification letter, to ensure that Tribes
and Alaska Native corporations are
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
advised of the mechanisms by which
they can participate. The Board
provides a variety of opportunities for
consultation: Proposing changes to the
existing rule; commenting on proposed
changes to the existing rule; engaging in
dialogue at the Regional Council
meetings; engaging in dialogue at the
Board’s meetings; and providing input
in person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at
any time during the rulemaking process.
The Board will commit to efficiently
and adequately providing an
opportunity to Tribes and Alaska Native
corporations for consultation in regard
to subsistence rulemaking.
The Board will consider Tribes’ and
Alaska Native corporations’
information, input, and
recommendations, and address their
concerns as much as practicable. The
Board will inform the Tribes and Alaska
Native corporations how their
recommendations were considered.
Developing the 2012–13 and 2013–14
Wildlife Seasons and Harvest Limit
Regulations
Subpart C and D regulations are
subject to periodic review and revision.
The Federal Subsistence Board
currently completes the process of
revising subsistence take of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and
fish and shellfish regulations in oddnumbered years; public proposal and
review processes take place during the
preceding year. The Board also
addresses customary and traditional use
determinations during the applicable
cycle.
The text of the final rule published
June 30, 2010 (75 FR 37918) for the
2010–12 subparts C and D regulations is
the text of this proposed rule. These
regulations will remain in effect until
subsequent Board action changes
elements as a result of the public review
process outlined above in this
document.
Compliance With Statutory and
Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal
Subsistence Management Program was
distributed for public comment on
October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
was published on February 28, 1992.
The Record of Decision (ROD) on
Subsistence Management for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska was signed April
6, 1992. The selected alternative in the
FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the
administrative framework of an annual
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
regulatory cycle for subsistence
regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment
dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is
available at the office listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The
Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human
environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA § 810 analysis was
completed as part of the FEIS process on
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The intent of all Federal
subsistence regulations is to accord
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife on
public lands a priority over the taking
of fish and wildlife on such lands for
other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and
wildlife populations. The final § 810
analysis determination appeared in the
April 6, 1992, ROD and concluded that
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program, under Alternative IV with an
annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local
impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses
significantly.
During the subsequent environmental
assessment process for extending
fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of
the effects of this rule was conducted in
accordance with § 810. That evaluation
also supported the Secretaries’
determination that the rule will not
reach the ‘‘may significantly restrict’’
threshold that would require notice and
hearings under ANILCA § 810(a).
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. This proposed
rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
OMB approval. OMB has reviewed and
approved the following collections of
information associated with the
subsistence regulations at 36 CFR part
242 and 50 CFR part 100: Subsistence
hunting and fishing applications,
permits, and reports, Federal
Subsistence Regional Advisory Council
Membership Application/Nomination
and Interview Forms (OMB Control No.
1018–0075 expires January 31, 2013).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is not significant and has
not reviewed this rule under Executive
Order 12866. OMB bases its
determination upon the following four
criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
(b) Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of flexibility analyses for
rules that will have a significant effect
on a substantial number of small
entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or
governmental jurisdictions. In general,
the resources to be harvested under this
rule are already being harvested and
consumed by the local harvester and do
not result in an additional dollar benefit
to the economy. However, we estimate
that two million pounds of meat are
harvested by subsistence users annually
and, if given an estimated dollar value
of $3.00 per pound, this amount would
equate to about $6 million in food value
statewide. Based upon the amounts and
values cited above, the Departments
certify that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It
does not have an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6733
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
priority on public lands. The scope of
this program is limited by definition to
certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and
certify pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that this rulemaking will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by
Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or
tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that
these regulations meet the applicable
standards provided in §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, regarding
civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the proposed rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA
precludes the State from exercising
subsistence management authority over
fish and wildlife resources on Federal
lands unless it meets certain
requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not provide
rights to tribes for the subsistence taking
of wildlife, fish, and shellfish. However,
the Board will provide Federally
recognized Tribes and Alaska Native
corporations an opportunity to consult
on this rule. Consultation with Alaska
Native corporations are based on Public
Law 108–199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23,
2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by
Public Law 108–447, div. H, title V, Sec.
518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267, which
provides that: ‘‘The Director of the
Office of Management and Budget and
all Federal agencies shall hereafter
consult with Alaska Native corporations
on the same basis as Indian tribes under
Executive Order No. 13175.’’
The Secretaries, through the Board,
will provide a variety of opportunities
for consultation: Commenting on
proposed changes to the existing rule;
engaging in dialogue at the Regional
Council meetings; engaging in dialogue
at the Board’s meetings; and providing
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
6734
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
input in person, by mail, e-mail, or
phone at any time during the
rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. However, this proposed rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 13211, affecting energy supply,
distribution, or use, and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
January 13, 2011.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
January 13, 2011.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA–Forest
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–2679 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these
regulations under the guidance of Peter
J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by:
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office,
National Park Service;
• Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
• Jerry Berg, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and
• Steve Kessler, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Forest Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR part
242 and 50 CFR part 100 for the 2012–
13 and 2013–14 regulatory years. The
text of the proposed amendments to 36
CFR 242.24, 242.25, and 242.26 and 50
CFR 100.24, 100.25, and 100.26 is the
final rule for the 2010–12 regulatory
period (75 FR 37918; June 30, 2010), as
modified by any subsequent Federal
Subsistence Board action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R9–IA–2008–0123; MO
92210–1113FWDB B6]
RIN 1018–AI83
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Reclassifying the Wood
Bison (Bison bison athabascae) Under
the Endangered Species Act as
Threatened Throughout Its Range
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule and notice of 12month petition finding.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
reclassify the wood bison (Bison bison
athabascae) from endangered to
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
This proposed action is amended based
on a review of the best available
scientific and commercial data, which
indicate that the endangered
designation no longer correctly reflects
the status of the wood bison. This
proposal also constitutes our 12-month
finding on the petition to reclassify this
subspecies. We are seeking data and
comments from the public on this
proposed rule.
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on this proposed rule by
April 11, 2011 in order to consider
them. We must receive your written
request for a public hearing by March
25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments and other information by
either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R9–
IA–2008–0123; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see the Public Comments section below
for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn Myers at U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Fisheries and Ecological
Services, 1011 E. Tudor Road,
Anchorage, Alaska 99503, or telephone
907–786–3559 or by facsimile at (907)
786–3848. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposed rule will be
based on the best scientific and
commercial data available and be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we request comments or
information from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, industry, or any
other interested party concerning this
proposed rule to reclassify the wood
bison as threatened. The comments that
will be most useful and likely to
influence our decisions are those that
are supported by data or peer-reviewed
studies and those that include citations
to, and analyses of, applicable laws and
regulations. Please make your comments
as specific as possible and explain the
basis for them. In addition, please
include sufficient information with your
comments (such as scientific journal
articles or other publications) to allow
us to authenticate any scientific or
commercial information you include.
We particularly seek comments
concerning:
(1) Information on taxonomy,
distribution, habitat selection and use,
food habits, population density and
trends, habitat trends, disease, and
effects of management on wood bison;
(2) Information on captive herds,
including efficacy of breeding and
reintroduction programs, origin of
parental stock, stock supplementation
for genetic purposes, growth rates, birth
and mortality rates in captivity, location
of captive herds in comparison to wild
populations, effects of captive breeding
on the species, and any other factors
from captive breeding that might affect
wild populations or natural habitat;
(3) Information on the adequacy of
existing regulatory mechanisms; trends
in domestic and international trade of
live specimens, sport-hunted trophies,
or other parts and products; poaching of
wild wood bison; illegal trade and
enforcement efforts and solutions; and
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6730-6734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2679]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. FWS-R7-SM-2010-0066; [70101-1261-0000L6]
RIN 1018-AX33
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska--
2012-13 and 2013-14 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits, methods and means related to taking
of wildlife for subsistence uses during the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014
regulatory years. The Federal Subsistence Board is on a schedule of
completing the process of revising subsistence taking of wildlife
regulations in even-numbered years and subsistence taking of fish and
shellfish regulations in odd-numbered years; public proposal and review
processes take place during the preceding year.
[[Page 6731]]
The Board also addresses customary and traditional use determinations
during the applicable cycle. When final, the resulting rulemaking will
replace the existing subsistence wildlife taking regulations. This rule
would also amend the general regulations on subsistence taking of fish
and wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils will hold public meetings to receive comments and make
proposals to change this proposed rule on several dates between
February 15 and March 24, 2011, and then hold another round of public
meetings to discuss and receive comments on the proposals, and make
recommendations on the proposals to the Federal Subsistence Board, on
several dates between August 23 and October 13, 2011. The Board will
discuss and evaluate proposed regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, in January 2012. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific information on dates and locations of the
public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and proposals to change this proposed
rule must be received or postmarked by March 24, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Board and the
Regional Advisory Councils' public meetings will be held at various
locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific
information on dates and locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: You may submit comments by one of the following
methods:
Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov and search for FWS-R7-SM-2010-0066, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
By hard copy: U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: USFWS, Office
of Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503-6199, or hand delivery to the
Designated Federal Official attending any of the Federal Subsistence
Regional Advisory Council public meetings. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for additional information on locations of the public
meetings.
We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see
the Public Review Process section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786-3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest System lands, contact Steve
Kessler, Regional Subsistence Program Leader, USDA, Forest Service,
Alaska Region; (907) 743-9461 or skessler@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), the Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) jointly implement the
Federal Subsistence Management Program. This program provides a
preference for take of fish and wildlife resources for subsistence uses
on Federal public lands and waters in Alaska. The Secretaries published
temporary regulations to carry out this program in the Federal Register
on June 29, 1990 (55 FR 27114), and final regulations were published in
the Federal Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The Program has
subsequently amended these regulations a number of times. Because this
program is a joint effort between Interior and Agriculture, these
regulations are located in two titles of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR): Title 36, ``Parks, Forests, and Public Property,''
and Title 50, ``Wildlife and Fisheries,'' at 36 CFR 242.1-28 and 50 CFR
100.1-28, respectively. The regulations contain subparts as follows:
Subpart A, General Provisions; Subpart B, Program Structure; Subpart C,
Board Determinations; and Subpart D, Subsistence Taking of Fish and
Wildlife.
Consistent with subpart B of these regulations, the Secretaries
established a Federal Subsistence Board to administer the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. The Board is currently made up of:
A Chair appointed by the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. National Park Service;
The Alaska State Director, U.S. Bureau of Land Management;
The Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian
Affairs; and
The Alaska Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies participate in the development of
regulations for subparts C and D, which, among other things, set forth
program eligibility and specific harvest seasons and limits.
In administering the program, the Secretaries divided Alaska into
10 subsistence resource regions, each of which is represented by a
Regional Advisory Council. The Regional Advisory Councils provide a
forum for rural residents with personal knowledge of local conditions
and resource requirements to have a meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on Federal public lands in Alaska. The
Regional Advisory Council members represent varied geographical,
cultural, and user interests within each region.
Public Review Process--Comments, Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Regional Advisory Councils have a substantial role in reviewing
this proposed rule and making recommendations for the final rule. The
Federal Subsistence Board, through the Regional Advisory Councils, will
hold meetings on this proposed rule at the following locations in
Alaska, on the following dates:
Region 1--Southeast Regional Council, Sitka, March 22, 2011
Region 2--Southcentral Regional Council, Anchorage, March 16, 2011
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council, Kodiak, February 16, 2011
Region 4--Bristol Bay Regional Council, Naknek, March 9, 2011
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council, Mtn. Village,
February 23, 2011
Region 6--Western Interior Regional Council, Galena, March 1, 2011
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Regional Council, Nome, February 15, 2011
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Regional Council, Kotzebue, March 18, 2011
Region 9--Eastern Interior Regional Council, Fairbanks, March 3, 2011
Region 10--North Slope Regional Council, Barrow, March 7, 2011
During April 2011, the written proposals to change the subpart D,
take of wildlife regulations and subpart C, customary and traditional
use determinations, will be compiled and distributed for public review.
During the 30-day public comment period, which is presently scheduled
to end on May 15, 2011, written public comments will be accepted on the
distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional Advisory Councils, will hold a
second series of meetings in August through October 2011, to receive
comments on specific proposals and to develop recommendations to the
Board at the following locations in Alaska, on the following dates:
Region 1--Southeast Regional Council, Wrangell, September 27, 2011
[[Page 6732]]
Region 2--Southcentral Regional Council, Cantwell, October 3, 2011
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council, Cold Bay, September 7,
2011
Region 4--Bristol Bay Regional Council, Dillingham, October 12, 2011
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council, TBA, September 29,
2011
Region 6--Western Interior Regional Council, Aniak, October 4, 2011
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Regional Council, Nome, September 21, 2011
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Regional Council, TBA, August 23, 2011
Region 9--Eastern Interior Regional Council, Tanana, October 11, 2011
Region 10--North Slope Regional Council, TBA, August 23, 2011
A notice will be published of specific dates, times, and meeting
locations in local and statewide newspapers prior to both series of
meetings. Locations and dates may change based on weather or local
circumstances. The amount of work on each Regional Advisory Council's
agenda determines the length of each Regional Advisory Council meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate proposed changes to the
subsistence management regulations during a public meeting scheduled to
be held in Anchorage, AK, in January 2012. The Regional Advisory
Council Chairs, or their designated representatives, will present their
respective Councils' recommendations at the Board meeting. Additional
oral testimony may be provided on specific proposals before the Board
at that time. At that public meeting, the Board will deliberate and
take final action on proposals received that request changes to this
proposed rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify the general fish and wildlife
regulations, wildlife harvest regulations, and customary and
traditional use determinations must include the following information:
a. Name, address, and telephone number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph designation in this proposed rule
for which changes are suggested, if applicable;
c. A description of the regulatory change(s) desired;
d. A statement explaining why each change is necessary;
e. Proposed wording changes; and
f. Any additional information that you believe will help the Board
in evaluating the proposed change.
The Board immediately rejects proposals that fail to include the
above information, or proposals that are beyond the scope of
authorities in Sec. ------.24, subpart C (the regulations governing
customary and traditional use determinations), and Sec. Sec. ------.25
and ------.26, subpart D (the general and specific regulations
governing the subsistence take of wildlife). During the January 2012
meeting, the Board may defer review and action on some proposals to
allow time for cooperative planning efforts, or to acquire additional
needed information. The Board may elect to defer taking action on any
given proposal if the workload of staff, Regional Advisory Councils, or
the Board becomes excessive. These deferrals may be based on
recommendations by the affected Regional Advisory Council(s) or staff
members, or on the basis of the Board's intention to do least harm to
the subsistence user and the resource involved. A proponent of a
proposal may withdraw the proposal provided it has not been presented
to a Regional Advisory Council for action. The Board may consider and
act on alternatives that address the intent of a proposal while
differing in approach.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' the Federal officials
that have been delegated authority by the Secretaries are committed to
honoring the unique government-to-government political relationship
that exists between the Federal Government and Federally Recognized
Indian Tribes (Tribes) as listed in 75 FR 60810 (October 1, 2010).
Consultation with Alaska Native corporations is based on Public Law
108-199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by
Public Law 108-447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat.
3267, which provides that: ``The Director of the Office of Management
and Budget and all Federal agencies shall hereafter consult with Alaska
Native corporations on the same basis as Indian tribes under Executive
Order No. 13175.''
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not
provide rights to Tribes for the subsistence taking of wildlife, fish,
and shellfish. However, because tribal members are affected by
subsistence fishing, hunting, and trapping regulations, the
Secretaries, through the Board, will provide Federally recognized
Tribes and Alaska Native corporations an opportunity to consult on this
rule.
The Board will engage in outreach efforts for this rule, including
a notification letter, to ensure that Tribes and Alaska Native
corporations are advised of the mechanisms by which they can
participate. The Board provides a variety of opportunities for
consultation: Proposing changes to the existing rule; commenting on
proposed changes to the existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the
Regional Council meetings; engaging in dialogue at the Board's
meetings; and providing input in person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at
any time during the rulemaking process. The Board will commit to
efficiently and adequately providing an opportunity to Tribes and
Alaska Native corporations for consultation in regard to subsistence
rulemaking.
The Board will consider Tribes' and Alaska Native corporations'
information, input, and recommendations, and address their concerns as
much as practicable. The Board will inform the Tribes and Alaska Native
corporations how their recommendations were considered.
Developing the 2012-13 and 2013-14 Wildlife Seasons and Harvest Limit
Regulations
Subpart C and D regulations are subject to periodic review and
revision. The Federal Subsistence Board currently completes the process
of revising subsistence take of wildlife regulations in even-numbered
years and fish and shellfish regulations in odd-numbered years; public
proposal and review processes take place during the preceding year. The
Board also addresses customary and traditional use determinations
during the applicable cycle.
The text of the final rule published June 30, 2010 (75 FR 37918)
for the 2010-12 subparts C and D regulations is the text of this
proposed rule. These regulations will remain in effect until subsequent
Board action changes elements as a result of the public review process
outlined above in this document.
Compliance With Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal Subsistence Management Program
was distributed for public comment on October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on February 28,
1992. The Record of Decision (ROD) on Subsistence Management for
Federal Public Lands in Alaska was signed April 6, 1992. The selected
alternative in the FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the administrative
framework of an annual
[[Page 6733]]
regulatory cycle for subsistence regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is available at the office listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Sec. 810 analysis was completed as part of the FEIS
process on the Federal Subsistence Management Program. The intent of
all Federal subsistence regulations is to accord subsistence uses of
fish and wildlife on public lands a priority over the taking of fish
and wildlife on such lands for other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and wildlife populations. The final
Sec. 810 analysis determination appeared in the April 6, 1992, ROD and
concluded that the Federal Subsistence Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental assessment process for
extending fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of the effects of this
rule was conducted in accordance with Sec. 810. That evaluation also
supported the Secretaries' determination that the rule will not reach
the ``may significantly restrict'' threshold that would require notice
and hearings under ANILCA Sec. 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. This
proposed rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require OMB approval. OMB has reviewed and approved the following
collections of information associated with the subsistence regulations
at 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100: Subsistence hunting and fishing
applications, permits, and reports, Federal Subsistence Regional
Advisory Council Membership Application/Nomination and Interview Forms
(OMB Control No. 1018-0075 expires January 31, 2013).
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is not significant and has not reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866. OMB bases its determination upon the following
four criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the economy or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of the government.
(b) Whether the rule will create inconsistencies with other
agencies' actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their
recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will have a
significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, which
include small businesses, organizations, or governmental jurisdictions.
In general, the resources to be harvested under this rule are already
being harvested and consumed by the local harvester and do not result
in an additional dollar benefit to the economy. However, we estimate
that two million pounds of meat are harvested by subsistence users
annually and, if given an estimated dollar value of $3.00 per pound,
this amount would equate to about $6 million in food value statewide.
Based upon the amounts and values cited above, the Departments certify
that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It does not have an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the Secretaries to administer a
subsistence priority on public lands. The scope of this program is
limited by definition to certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of private property implications
as defined by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and certify pursuant to the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that these regulations meet the
applicable standards provided in Sec. Sec. 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, regarding civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the proposed rule does
not have sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State
from exercising subsistence management authority over fish and wildlife
resources on Federal lands unless it meets certain requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not
provide rights to tribes for the subsistence taking of wildlife, fish,
and shellfish. However, the Board will provide Federally recognized
Tribes and Alaska Native corporations an opportunity to consult on this
rule. Consultation with Alaska Native corporations are based on Public
Law 108-199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended
by Public Law 108-447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118
Stat. 3267, which provides that: ``The Director of the Office of
Management and Budget and all Federal agencies shall hereafter consult
with Alaska Native corporations on the same basis as Indian tribes
under Executive Order No. 13175.''
The Secretaries, through the Board, will provide a variety of
opportunities for consultation: Commenting on proposed changes to the
existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the Regional Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue at the Board's meetings; and providing
[[Page 6734]]
input in person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at any time during the
rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
This Executive Order requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. However, this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 13211, affecting
energy supply, distribution, or use, and no Statement of Energy Effects
is required.
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Peter J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Additional assistance was provided by:
Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management;
Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy Swanton, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional Office, Bureau of Indian
Affairs;
Jerry Berg, Alaska Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; and
Steve Kessler, Alaska Regional Office, U.S. Forest
Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100 for the
2012-13 and 2013-14 regulatory years. The text of the proposed
amendments to 36 CFR 242.24, 242.25, and 242.26 and 50 CFR 100.24,
100.25, and 100.26 is the final rule for the 2010-12 regulatory period
(75 FR 37918; June 30, 2010), as modified by any subsequent Federal
Subsistence Board action.
January 13, 2011.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
January 13, 2011.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-2679 Filed 2-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-55-P