FTA Fiscal Year 2011 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program Information, 6958-7079 [2011-2592]
Download as PDF
6958
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2011 Apportionments,
Allocations, and Program Information
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) annually
publishes one or more notices
apportioning funds appropriated by law.
In some cases, if less than a full year of
funding is available, FTA publishes
multiple partial apportionment notices.
This notice is the first notice
announcing partial apportionment of
Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 formula funds. It
also provides program guidance and
requirements; and provides information
on several program issues important in
the current fiscal year. The notice also
includes tables that show certain
unobligated (carryover) funding
discretionary programs from previous
years that will be available for
obligation during FY 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information about this notice
contact Kimberly Sledge, Team Leader,
Transit Program Management Team, at
(202) 366–2053. Please contact the
appropriate FTA regional office for any
specific requests for information or
technical assistance. The Appendix at
the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An
FTA headquarters contact for each
major program area is included in the
discussion of that program in the text of
the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2011 Available Funding for FTA
Programs
A. Available Funding Based on Continuing
Appropriations and Surface
Transportation Extension Act, 2011, and
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU).
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Oversight
III. 2011 FTA Programs
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305)
B. Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5307)
D. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization
E. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and
Individuals With Disabilities Program
(49 U.S.C. 5310)
F. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
G. Rural Transportation Assistance
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
H. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
I. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
J. Growing States and High Density States
Formula (49 U.S.C. 5340)
IV. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2011
Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to
Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2011 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Technical Assistance
Tables
1. FTA FY 2011 Appropriations and
Apportionments for Grant Programs
2. FTA FY 2011 Metropolitan Planning
Program and Statewide Planning and
Research Program Apportionments
3. FTA FY 2011 Section 5307 and Section
5340 Urbanized Area Apportionments
3–A. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas
200,000 or More in Population Eligible to
Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating
Assistance
4. FTA FY 2011 Section 5307
Apportionment Formula
5. FTA FY 2011 Formula Programs
Apportionments Data Unit Values
6. FTA FY 2011 Small Transit Intensive
Cities Performance Data and
Apportionments
7. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5308 Clean Fuels Allocations
8. FTA FY 2011 Section 5309 Fixed
Guideway Modernization
Apportionments
9. FTA FY 2011 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program Apportionment
Formula
10. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5309 Buses and Bus Related Equipment
and Facilities Allocations
11. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section
5309 New Starts Allocations
12. FTA FY 2011 Special Needs for Elderly
Individuals and Individuals with
Disabilities Apportionments
13. FTA FY 2011 Section 5311 and Section
5340 Nonurbanized Area Formula
Apportionments, and Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) Allocations
14. FTA Prior Unobligated Tribal Transit
Discretionary Allocations
15. FTA FY 2011 Section 5316 Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC)
Apportionments
16. FTA FY 2011 Section 5317 New
Freedom Apportionments
17. 2011 FTA Prior Year Unobligated
Section 5339 Alternatives Analysis
Allocations
Appendix
I. Overview
FTA’s current authorization, the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient,
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU), expired
September 30, 2009. Since that time,
Congress has enacted short-term
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
extensions allowing FTA to continue its
current programs. Most recently, the
Continuing Appropriations and Surface
Transportation Extensions Act, 2011, as
amended, (Pub. L. 111–322, Div. C),
continues the authorization of the
Federal transit programs of the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT)
through March 4, 2011. It extends
contract authority for programs in the
Formula and Bus Grants account
provided in the previous authorization
extension Hiring Incentives to Restore
Employment Act (Pub. L. 111–147) until
March 4, 2011, i.e., approximately
5/12th of the contract authority
available in FY 2010.
This document apportions
approximately $3 billion in FY 2011
funds made available under the
Continuing Appropriations and Surface
Transportation Extensions of Act 2011,
as amended, hereinafter, (‘‘CR, 2011’’)
among potential program recipients
according to statutory formulas in 49
U.S.C. Chapter 53. This is in addition to
over $4.2 billion existing in unobligated
formula funds available from prior
years. The notice includes FY 2011
formula funds that are currently
available, which is approximately 5/12
or 42.47% of the amounts that were
available under the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
117). The notice does not include any
extension or reprogramming of any
discretionary funds that lapsed to the
designated project as of September 30,
2010. FTA will issue a supplemental
notice at a later date for any additional
increments of formula and discretionary
funds that become available.
For each FTA program included in
this notice, we have provided relevant
information on the FY 2011 funding
currently available, program
requirements, period of availability, and
other related program information and
highlights, as appropriate. A separate
section of the document provides
information on program requirements
and guidance that are applicable to all
FTA programs.
II. FY 2011 Available Funding for FTA
Programs
A. Funding Based on the Continuing
Appropriations and Surface
Transportation Extensions Act, 2011
(Pub. L. 111–322)
The CR 2011 makes available
approximately 5/12ths of the contract
authority levels authorized in FY 2010
for the Formula programs. Table 1 of
this document shows the funding that is
currently available for the FTA
programs. This Federal Register notice
includes tables of apportionments and
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6959
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
allocations for FTA formula programs
based on CR, 2011 and carryover
discretionary funds.
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project
Management Oversight
As background, Section 5327 of title
49 U.S.C. authorizes the takedown of
funds from FTA programs for project
management oversight. Section 5327
provides oversight takedowns at the
following levels: 0.5 percent of Planning
funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area
Formula funds, 1 percent of Capital
Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special
Needs of Elderly Individuals and
Individuals with Disabilities formula
funds, 0.5 percent of Non-urbanized
Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent of
the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in the Parks
Program funds (formerly the Alternative
Transportation in the Parks and Public
Lands Program).
The funds are used to provide
necessary oversight activities, including
oversight of the construction of any
major capital project under these
statutory programs; to conduct State
Safety Oversight, drug and alcohol, civil
rights, procurement systems,
management, planning certification and,
financial reviews and audits, as well as
evaluations and analyses of grantee
specific problems and issues; and to
provide technical assistance to correct
deficiencies identified in compliance
reviews and audits.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
III. 2011 FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides the
available FY 2011 funding through
March 4, 2011, and/or other important
program-related information for eleven
FTA formula programs that are
contained in this notice. Funding and/
or other important information for each
of the formula programs is presented
immediately below. This includes
program apportionments, certain
program requirements, length of time
FY 2011 funding is available for
obligation and other significant program
information pertaining to FY 2011.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305(d))
Section 5305(d) authorizes Federal
funding to support a cooperative,
continuous, and comprehensive
planning program for transportation
investment decision-making at the
metropolitan area level. The specific
requirements of metropolitan
transportation planning are set forth in
49 U.S.C. 5303 and further explained in
23 CFR Part 450, as incorporated by
reference in 49 CFR Part 613, Statewide
Transportation Planning; Metropolitan
Transportation Planning; Final Rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
State Departments of Transportation are
direct recipients of funds allocated by
FTA, which are then suballocated to
Metropolitan Planning Organizations
(MPOs) by formula, for planning
activities that support the economic
vitality of the metropolitan area,
especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency; increasing the safety and
security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users;
increasing the accessibility and mobility
options available to people and for
freight; protecting and enhancing the
environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of
life; enhancing the integration and
connectivity of the transportation
system, across and between modes, for
people and freight; promoting efficient
transportation system management and
operation; and emphasizing the
preservation of the existing
transportation system. This funding
must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods in the
metropolitan area. Comprehensive
transportation planning is not limited to
transit planning or surface
transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. Eligible
work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to
management, mobility management,
planning, operations, capital
requirements, and economic feasibility;
evaluation of previously funded
projects; peer reviews and exchanges of
technical data, information, assistance,
and related activities in support of
planning and environmental analysis
among MPOs and other transportation
planners; work elements and related
activities preliminary to and in
preparation for constructing, acquiring,
or improving the operation of facilities
and equipment; development of
coordinated public transit human
services transportation plans. An
exhaustive list of eligible work activities
is provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan
Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated
September 1, 2008. For more about the
Metropolitan Planning Program and the
FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact Victor
Austin, Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366–2996.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $39,790,936 to the
Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305(d) to support metropolitan
transportation planning activities set
forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303. The total
amount apportioned for the
Metropolitan Planning Program to States
for MPOs’ use in urbanized areas
(UZAs) is $39,591,981, as shown in the
table below, after the deduction for
oversight.
METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...........
Oversight Deduction .........
$39,790,936
¥198,955
Total Apportioned ......
39,591,981
States’ apportionments for this
program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of
the amounts authorized for Section 5305
are allocated to the Metropolitan
Planning program. FTA allocates
Metropolitan Planning funds to the
States according to a statutory formula.
Eighty percent of the funds are
distributed to the States as a basic
allocation based on each State’s UZA
population, based on the most recent
decennial Census. The remaining 20
percent is provided to the States as a
supplemental allocation based on an
FTA administrative formula to address
planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published
for each State is a combined total of
both the basic and supplemental
allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan
Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for
projects included in an annual work
program (the Unified Planning Work
Program, or UPWP) that includes both
highway and transit planning projects.
Each State has either reaffirmed or
developed, in consultation with their
MPOs, an allocation formula, based on
the 2000 Census. The State allocation
formula may be changed annually, but
any change requires approval by the
FTA regional office before grant
approval. Program guidance for the
Metropolitan Planning Program is found
in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program
Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and
State Planning and Research Program
Grants, dated September 1, 2008. For
more about the Metropolitan Planning
Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C,
contact Victor Austin, Office of
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6960
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
Planning and Environment at (202) 366–
2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the
Metropolitan Planning program to each
State remain available for obligation by
FTA to recipients for four fiscal years—
which includes the year of
apportionment plus three additional
years. Any apportioned funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2014, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Metropolitan Planning
Program.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
5. Consolidated Planning Grants
FTA and FHWA planning funds
under both the Metropolitan Planning
and State Planning and Research
Programs can be consolidated into a
single consolidated planning grant
(CPG), awarded by either FTA or
FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to
monitor individual fund sources, if
several have been used, and ensures that
the oldest funds will always be used
first. Unlike ‘‘flex funds’’ for capital
programs, planning funds from FHWA
may be combined with FTA planning
funds in a single grant. Alternatively,
FTA planning funds may be transferred
to FHWA to be administered as
combined grants.
Under the CPG, States can report
metropolitan planning program
expenditures (to comply with the Single
Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA
under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for FTA’s
Metropolitan Planning Program
(20.505). Additionally, for States with
an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL)
fund-matching ratio greater than 80
percent, the State can waive the 20
percent local share requirement, with
FTA’s concurrence, to allow FTA funds
used for metropolitan planning in a CPG
to be granted at the higher FHWA rate.
For some States, this Federal match rate
can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring
planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA Regional
Office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures. Current
guidelines are included in Federal
Highway Administration Memorandum
dated July 12, 2007, ‘‘Information: Final
Transfers to Other Agencies that
Administer Title 23 Programs.’’
For further information on CPGs,
contact Nancy Grubb, Office of Budget
and Policy, FTA, at (202)366–1635.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
B. Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(e))
This program provides financial
assistance to States for Statewide
transportation planning and other
technical assistance activities, including
supplementing the technical assistance
program provided through the
Metropolitan Planning program. The
specific requirements of Statewide
transportation planning are set forth in
49 U.S.C. 5304 and further explained in
23 CFR Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR
Part 613, Statewide Transportation
Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. This funding must
support work elements and activities
resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning
is not limited to transit planning or
surface transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. For more
information, contact Victor Austin,
Office of Planning and Environment at
(202) 366–2996.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $8,312,227 to the
State Planning and Research Program
(49 U.S.C. 5305). The total amount
apportioned for the State Planning and
Research Program (SPRP) is $8,270,666
as shown in the table below, after the
deduction for oversight (authorized by
49 U.S.C. 5327).
STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH
PROGRAM
technical studies and assistance,
demonstrations, and management
training. In addition, a State may
authorize a portion of these funds to be
used to supplement Metropolitan
Planning funds allocated by the State to
its UZAs, as the State deems
appropriate. Program guidance for the
State Planning and Research program is
found in FTA Circular 8100.1C. This
funding must support work elements
and activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning
is not limited to transit planning or
surface transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. Eligible
work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to
management, planning, operations,
capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously
funded projects; peer reviews and
exchanges of technical data,
information, assistance, and related
activities in support of planning and
environmental analysis; work elements
and related activities preliminary to and
in preparation for constructing,
acquiring, or improving the operation of
facilities and equipment. An exhaustive
list of eligible work activities is
provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan
Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated
September 1, 2008. For more
information, contact Victor Austin,
Office of Planning and Environment at
(202) 366–2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the
Total Apportioned ......
8,270,666 State Planning and Research program to
each State remain available for
State apportionments for this program obligation for four fiscal years, which
include the year of apportionment plus
are displayed in Table 2.
three additional fiscal years. Any
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
apportioned funds that remain
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of
unobligated at the close of business on
the amounts authorized for Section 5305 September 30, 2014, will revert to FTA
are allocated to the State Planning and
for reapportionment under the State
Research program. FTA apportions
Planning and Research Program.
funds to States by a statutory formula
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
that is based on the most recent
U.S.C. 5307)
decennial Census, and the State’s UZA
Section 5307 authorizes Federal
population as compared to the UZA
capital assistance, and in some cases,
population of all States.
operating assistance for public
3. Requirements
transportation in UZAs. A UZA is an
Funds are provided to States for
area with a population of 50,000 or
Statewide transportation planning
more that has been defined and
programs. These funds may be used for
designated as such in the 2000 Census
a variety of purposes such as planning,
by the U.S. Census Bureau. The
Total Appropriation ...........
Oversight Deduction .........
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
$8,312,227
¥41,561
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
and more, the formula is based on a
combination of bus revenue vehicle
miles, bus passenger miles, fixed
guideway revenue vehicle miles, and
fixed guideway route miles, as well as
population and population density.
Table 4 includes detailed information
about the formulas.
To calculate a UZA’s FY 2011
apportionment, FTA used population
and population density statistics from
the 2000 Census and (when applicable)
validated mileage and transit service
data from transit providers’ 2009
National Transit Database (NTD) Report
Year. Consistent with 49 U.S.C. 5336(b),
FTA used 60 percent of the directional
route miles attributable to the Alaska
Railroad passenger operations system to
calculate the apportionment for the
Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
FTA has calculated dollar unit values
for the formula factors used in the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money
each unit of a factor is worth in this
year’s apportionment. The unit values
change each year, based on all of the
data used to calculate the
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
apportionments. The dollar unit values
CR 2011 provides $1,763,230,999 to
for FY 2011 are displayed in Table 5. To
the Urbanized Area Formula Program
replicate the basic formula component
(49 U.S.C. 5307). The total amount
of a UZA’s apportionment, multiply the
apportioned for the Urbanized Area
dollar unit value by the appropriate
Formula Program is $1,916,008,252 as
formula factor (i.e., the population,
shown in the table below, after the 0.75
population x population density), and
percent deduction for oversight
when applicable, data from the NTD
(authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and
(i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles,
including funds apportioned to UZAs
passenger miles, and operating cost).
In FY 2011, one percent of funds
from the appropriation for Section 5340
appropriated for Section 5307, or
for Growing States and High Density
$17,632,310 based on CR 2011 is set
States.
aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM (STIC). FTA apportions these funds to
UZAs under 200,000 in population that
a $1,763,230,999
operate at a level of service equal to or
Total Appropriation .........
Oversight Deduction .......
¥13,224,232 above the industry average level of
Section 5340 Funds
service for all UZAs with a population
Added ..........................
166,001,486 of at least 200,000, but not more than
999,999, in one or more of six
Total Apportioned ....
1,916,008,252
performance categories: passenger miles
a One percent set-aside for Small Transit Intraveled per vehicle revenue mile,
tensive Cities Formula.
passenger miles traveled per vehicle
revenue hour, vehicle revenue miles per
Table 3 displays the amounts
capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita,
apportioned under the Urbanized Area
passenger miles traveled per capita, and
Formula Program.
passengers per capita.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The data for these categories for the
FTA apportions Urbanized Area
purpose of FY 2011 apportionments
Formula Program funds based on
comes from the NTD reports for the
legislative formulas. Different formulas
2009 reporting year. This data is used to
apply to UZAs with populations of
determine a UZA’s eligibility under the
200,000 or more and to UZAs with
STIC formula, and is also used in the
populations less than 200,000. For
STIC apportionment calculations.
UZAs with 50,000 to 199,999 in
Because these performance data change
population, the formula is based solely
with each year’s NTD reports, the UZAs
on population and population density.
eligible for STIC funds and the amount
For UZAs with populations of 200,000
each receives may vary each year. In FY
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Urbanized Area Formula Program funds
may also be used to support planning
activities, and may supplement
planning projects funded under the
Metropolitan Planning program.
Urbanized Areas Formula Program
funds used for planning must be shown
in the Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP) for MPO(s) with responsibility
for that area. Funding is apportioned
directly to each UZA with a population
of 200,000 or more, and to the State
Governors for UZAs with populations
between 50,000 and 200,000. Eligible
applicants are limited to entities
designated as recipients in accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and other
public entities with the consent of the
Designated Recipient. Generally,
operating assistance is not an eligible
expense for UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more. However, there are
several exceptions to this restriction.
The exceptions are described in section
3(d)(5) below.
For more information about the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
6961
2011, FTA apportioned $55,976 for each
performance factor/category for which
the urbanized area exceeded the
national average for UZAs with a
population of at least 200,000 but not
more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned
to UZAs, according to the Section 5307
formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C.
5336, FTA also apportions funds to
urbanized areas under Section 5340
Growing States and High Density States
formula factors. In FY 2011, FTA
apportions $67,464,168 to UZAs in
growing States and $98,537,318 to UZAs
in High Density States. Half of the funds
appropriated for Section 5340 are
available to Growing States and half to
High Density States. FTA apportions
Growing States funds by a formula
based on State population forecasts for
15 years beyond the most recent Census.
FTA distributes the amounts
apportioned for each State between
UZAs and nonurbanized areas based on
the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized
population within each State in the
2000 census, and to UZAs
proportionately based on UZA
population in the 2000 census (because
population estimates are not available at
the UZA level). FTA apportions the
High Density States funds to States with
population densities in excess of 370
persons per square mile. These funds
are apportioned only to UZAs within
those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA’s
share of the High Density funds based
on the population of the UZAs in the
State in the 2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for
the Growing States or High Density
formulas because the allocations to
individual States and urbanized areas
are based on their relative population
data, rather than on a national per capita
basis.
Based on language in the conference
report accompanying SAFETEA–LU,
FTA is to show a single apportionment
amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. FTA shows a single
Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized
Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned
based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any
Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses
separate formulas to calculate and
generate the respective apportionment
amounts for the Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. For technical assistance
purposes, the UZAs that received STIC
funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will
make available breakouts of the funding
allocated to each UZA under these
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6962
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
formulas, upon request to the regional
office.
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized
Area Formula Program is currently
found in FTA Circular 9030.1D,
Urbanized Area Formula Program: Grant
Application Instructions, dated May 1,
2010, and supplemented by additional
information or changes provided in this
document.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
a. Urbanized Area Formula
Apportionments to Governors
For small UZAs, those with a
population of less than 200,000, FTA
apportions funds to the Governor of
each State for distribution. A single total
Governor’s apportionment amount for
the Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and
Growing States and High Density States
is shown in the Urbanized Area
Formula Apportionment Table 3. The
table also shows the apportionment
amount attributable by formula to each
small UZA within the State for
information purposes only unless the
small UZA is located within the
planning boundaries of a Transportation
Management Area (TMA). The Governor
is not bound by the small UZA amounts
published in this notice and shall
determine the sub-allocation of funds
among the small UZAs. The Governor’s
sub-allocation should be sent to the
appropriate FTA Regional Office before
grants are awarded. In the case of a
small UZA that is located within the
planning boundaries of TMA, the
Governor must allocate to that small
UZA, as discussed in subsection f
below.
b. Transit Enhancements
Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that
one percent of Section 5307 funds
apportioned to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more be spent on eligible
transit enhancement activities or
projects. This requirement is now
treated as a certification, rather than as
a set-aside as was the case under the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA–21). Designated
recipients in UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more certify they are
spending no less than one percent of
Section 5307 funds for transit
enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual
report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year’s final
quarterly progress report in TEAM–
Web. The report should include the
following elements: (1) Grantee name;
(2) UZA name and number; (3) FTA
project number; (4) transit enhancement
category; (5) brief description of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
enhancement and progress towards
project implementation; (6) activity line
item code from the approved budget;
and (7) amount awarded by FTA for the
enhancement. The list of transit
enhancement categories and Activity
Line Item (ALI) codes may be found in
the table of Scope and ALI codes on
TEAM–Web, which can be accessed at
https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ‘‘transit enhancement’’
includes projects or project elements
that are designed to enhance public
transportation service or use and are
physically or functionally related to
transit facilities. Eligible enhancements
include the following: (1) Historic
preservation, rehabilitation, and
operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities
(including historic bus and railroad
facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3)
landscaping and other scenic
beautification, including tables,
benches, trash receptacles, and street
lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian
access and walkways; (6) bicycle access,
including bicycle storage facilities and
installing equipment for transporting
bicycles on mass transportation
vehicles; (7) transit connections to parks
within the recipient’s transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced
access for persons with disabilities to
mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to
determine how the one-percent for
transit enhancements will be allotted to
transit projects. The one percent
minimum requirement does not
preclude more than one percent from
being expended in a UZA for transit
enhancements. However, activities that
are only eligible as enhancements—in
particular, operating costs for historic
facilities—may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects
Consistent with section 5307(d)(1)(J),
each recipient of Urbanized Area
Formula funds must certify that of the
amount received each fiscal year, it will
expend at least one percent on ‘‘public
transportation security projects’’ or must
certify that it has decided the
expenditure is not necessary. For
applicants not eligible to receive Section
5307 funds for operating assistance,
only capital security projects may be
funded with the one percent.
SAFETEA–LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ‘‘capital’’ projects to
include specific crime prevention and
security activities, including: (1)
Projects to refine and develop security
and emergency response plans; (2)
projects aimed at detecting chemical
and biological agents in public
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
transportation; (3) the conduct of
emergency response drills with public
transportation agencies and local first
response agencies; and (4) security
training for public transportation
employees, but excluding all expenses
related to operations, other than such
expenses incurred in conducting
emergency drills and training. Activity
Line Item (ALI) codes have been
established for these four new capital
activities and will be used to track the
use of this provision. The one percent
may also include security expenditures
included within other capital activities,
and, where the recipient is eligible,
operating assistance.
FTA is often called upon to report to
Congress and others on how grantees are
expending Federal funds for security
enhancements. To facilitate tracking of
grantees’ security expenditures, which
are not always evident when included
within larger capital or operating ALI
items in the grant budget, we have
established a non-additive (‘‘non-add’’)
scope code for security expenditures—
Scope 991. The non-add scope is to be
used to aggregate activities included in
other scopes, and it does not increase
the budget total. Section 5307 grantees
should include this non-add scope in
the project budget for each new Section
5307 grant application or amendment.
Under this non-add scope, the applicant
should repeat the full amount of any of
the line items in the budget that are
exclusively for security and include the
portion of any other line item in the
project budget that is attributable to
security, using under the non-add scope
the same line item used in the project
budget. The grantee can modify the ALI
description or use the extended text
feature, if necessary, to describe the
security expenditures.
The grantee must provide information
regarding its use of the one percent for
security as part of each Section 5307
grant application, using a special screen
in TEAM–Web. If the grantee has
certified that it is not necessary to
expend one percent for security, the
Section 5307 grant application must
include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an
application for a Section 5307 grant
until the security information is
complete.
d. FY 2011 Operating Assistance
UZAs under 200,000 in population
may use Section 5307 funds for
operating assistance. In addition,
Section 5307, as amended, allows some
UZAs with a population of 200,000 or
more to use Urbanized Area Formula
funds for operating assistance under
certain conditions. CR, 2011 extends
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
that eligibility until March 4, 2011. The
specific provisions allowing the limited
use of operating assistance in large
UZAs follow:
(1) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for
grants for the operating costs of
equipment and facilities for use in
public transportation in the Evansville,
IN–KY urbanized area, for a portion or
portions of the UZA if ‘‘the portion’’ of
the UZA includes only one State, the
population of ‘‘the portion’’ is less than
30,000, and the grants will not be used
to provide public transportation outside
of ‘‘the portion’’ of the UZA.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides
operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation
for local governmental authorities in
areas which adopted transit operating
and financing plans that became a part
of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result
of the 2000 decennial census of
population, but lie outside the service
area of the principal public
transportation agency that serves the
Houston UZA.
(3) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the
formula to be used to apportion Section
5307 funds to UZAs with population of
200,000 or more. SAFETEA–LU
amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that
stated, ‘‘ * * * except that the amount
apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area under subsection (b) shall be
available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger
operations.’’ This language has the effect
of directing that funds apportioned to
the Anchorage urbanized area, under
the fixed guideway tiers of the Section
5307 apportionment formula, be made
available to the Alaska Railroad, and
that these funds may be used for any
capital or operating costs related to its
passenger operations.
(4) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA–21, as
amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction
on the use of operating assistance in a
UZA with a population of 200,000 or
more, by allowing transit providers/
grantees that provide service exclusively
to elderly persons and persons with
disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds
apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding
made available for this purpose under
Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million.
Transit providers/grantees eligible
under this provision have already been
identified and notified.
(5) Consistent with the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act, 2008, in FY
2009, section 5307(b)(2) allowed: (1)
UZAs that grew in population from
under 200,000 to over 200,000 or that
were under 200,000 but merged into
another urbanized area and the
population is over 200,000, as a result
of the 2000 Census to use Section 5307
funds for operating assistance in an
amount up to 50 percent of the
grandfathered amount for FY 2002
funds; (2) Areas that were nonurbanized
under the 1990 Census and became
urbanized, as a result of the 2000
Census, to use no more than 50 percent
of the amount apportioned to the area
for FY 2003 for operating assistance;
and (3) nonurbanized areas under the
1990 Census that merged into urbanized
areas over 200,000, as a result of the
2000 Census, to use 50 percent of the
amount the area received in FY 2002
Section 5311 funding for operating
assistance. CR 2011 continued these
special rules for the period October 1,
2009 through March 4, 2011.
e. Sources of Local Match
Consistent with Section 5307(e), the
Federal share of an urbanized area
formula grant is 80 percent of net
project cost for a capital project and 50
percent of net project cost for operating
assistance unless the recipient indicates
Designated TMA
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
f. Designated Transportation
Management Areas (TMA)
Guidance for setting the boundaries of
TMAs is in the joint transportation
planning regulations codified at 23 CFR
Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR Part
613. In some cases, the TMA planning
boundaries established by the MPO for
the designated TMA includes one or
more small UZAs. In addition, one
small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has been
designated as a TMA. In either of these
situations, the Governor cannot allocate
‘‘Governor’s Apportionment’’ funds
attributed to the small UZAs to other
areas; that is, the Governor only has
discretion to allocate Governor’s
Apportionment funds attributable to
areas that are outside of designated
TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included
within the planning boundaries of
designated TMAs is provided in the
table below:
Saratoga Springs, NY.
Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The Woodlands, TX.
St. Augustine, FL.
Kissimmee, FL.
Titusville, FL.
Pottstown, PA.
Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV–Steubenville, OH–PA (PA portion); Uniontown-Connellsville, PA.
Bremerton, WA.
Frederick, MD.
The MPO must notify the Associate
Administrator for Program Management,
Federal Transit Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, in writing, no later than July
1 of each year of the identity of any
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
a greater local share. The remainder of
the net project cost (i.e., 20 percent and
50 percent, respectively) shall be
provided from the following sources:
(1) From non-Government sources
other than revenues from providing
public transportation services;
(2) From revenues derived from the
sale of advertising and concessions;
(3) From an undistributed cash
surplus, a replacement or depreciation
cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
(4) From amounts received under a
service agreement with a State or local
social service agency or private social
service organization; and
(5) Proceeds from the issuance of
revenue bonds.
(6) Funds from Section
403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be
used to match Urbanized Area Formula
funds.
Small urbanized area included in TMA planning boundary
Albany, NY ......................................
Houston, TX ....................................
Jacksonville, FL ..............................
Orlando, FL .....................................
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ................
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD. ........
Pittsburg, PA ...................................
Seattle, WA .....................................
Washington, DC–VA–MD ...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
6963
Jkt 223001
small UZA within the planning
boundaries of a TMA.
PO 00000
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used
for Highway Purposes
Funds apportioned to a TMA are
eligible for transfer to FHWA for
highway projects, if the Designated
Recipient has allocated a portion of the
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6964
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
area’s Section 5307 funding for such
use. However, before funds can be
transferred, the following conditions
must be met: (1) Approval by the MPO
in writing, after appropriate notice and
opportunity for comment and appeal are
provided to affected transit providers;
(2) a determination of the Secretary that
funds are not needed for investments
required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3)
the MPO determines that local transit
needs are being addressed.
The MPO should notify the
appropriate FTA Regional
Administrator of its intent to use FTA
funds for highway purposes. Urbanized
Area Formula funds that are designated
by the MPO for highway projects and
meet the conditions cited in the
previous paragraph will be transferred
to and administered by FHWA.
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program
funds apportioned in this notice are
available for obligation during the year
of appropriation plus three additional
years. Accordingly, these funds must be
obligated in grants by September 30,
2014. Any apportioned funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2014, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Urbanized Area Formula
Program.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of
200,000 or more, the Governor, in
consultation with responsible local
officials and publicly owned operators
of public transportation, has designated
one or more entities to be the
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
funds apportioned to the UZA. The
same entity(s) may or may not be the
Designated Recipient for the Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New
Freedom program funds apportioned to
the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 in
population, the State is the Designated
Recipient for Section 5307 as well as
JARC and New Freedom programs. The
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
may authorize other entities to apply
directly to FTA for Section 5307 grants
pursuant to a supplemental agreement.
While the requirement that projects
selected for funding be included in a
locally developed coordinated public
transit/human service transportation
plan is not included in Section 5307 as
it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that
in their role as public transit providers,
recipients of Section 5307 funds will be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
participants in the local planning
process for these programs.
D. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital
assistance for the maintenance,
recapitalization, and modernization of
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds
are apportioned by a statutory formula
to UZAs with fixed guideway systems
that have been in operation for at least
seven years. A ‘‘fixed guideway’’ refers
to any transit service that uses exclusive
or controlled rights-of-way or rails,
entirely or in part. The term includes
heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail,
monorail, trolleybus, aerial tramway,
inclined plane, cable car, automated
guideway transit, ferryboats, that
portion of motor bus service operated on
exclusive or controlled rights-of-way,
and high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV)
lanes. Eligible applicants are the public
transit authorities in those urbanized
areas to which the funds are
apportioned. For more information
about Fixed Guideway Modernization
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
55,997) as an eligible UZA for purposes
of apportioning Fixed Guideway
Modernization funds. Also, consistent
to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA uses 60
percent of the directional route miles
attributable to the Alaska Railroad
passenger operations system to calculate
the apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309
Fixed Guideway Modernization
formula.
FY 2011 Formula apportionments are
based on data grantees provided to the
NTD for the 2009 report year. Table 9
provides additional information and
details on the formula. Dollar unit
values for the formula factors used in
the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program are displayed in Table 5. To
replicate an area’s apportionment,
multiply the dollar unit value by the
appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
must be used for capital projects to
maintain, modernize, or improve fixed
guideway systems. Eligible UZAs (those
with a population of 200,000 or more)
with fixed guideway systems that are at
least seven years old are entitled to
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization
CR 2011 provides $706,290,063 to the funds. A threshold level of more than
one mile of fixed guideway is required
Fixed Guideway Modernization
in order to receive Fixed Guideway
Program. The total amount apportioned
Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs
for the Fixed Guideway Modernization
reporting one mile or less of fixed
Program is $699,227,162, after the
deduction for oversight, as shown in the guideway mileage to the NTD are not
included. However, funds apportioned
table below.
to an urbanized area may be used on
any fixed guideway segment in the
FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
UZA. Program guidance for Fixed
PROGRAM
Guideway Modernization is presently
Total Appropriation ...............
$706,290,063 found in FTA Circular C9300.1B,
Oversight Deduction .............
¥7,062,901 Capital Facilities and Formula Grant
Programs, dated November 1, 2008.
Total Apportioned ..........
699,227,162
The FY 2011 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program apportionments
to eligible areas are displayed in Table
8.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds
includes seven tiers. The apportionment
of funding under the first four tiers is
based on amounts specified in law and
NTD data used to apportion funds in FY
1997. Funding under the last three tiers
is apportioned based on the latest
available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at
least seven years old, as reported to the
NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C.
provides for the inclusion of
Morgantown, West Virginia (population
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice
under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain
available to recipients to be obligated in
a grant during the year of appropriation
plus three additional years. FY 2011
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
that remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2014, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program.
E. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals With Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
This program provides formula
funding to States for capital projects to
assist private nonprofit groups in
meeting the transportation needs of the
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
Capital assistance is provided on an
80 percent Federal, 20 percent local
matching basis except that Section
5310(c) allows States eligible for a
higher match under the sliding scale for
FHWA programs to use that match ratio
for Section 5310 capital projects.
Operating assistance is 50 percent
Federal, 50 percent local. Funds
provided under other Federal programs
(other than those of the U.S. DOT, with
the exception of the Federal Lands
Highway Program established by 23
U.S.C. 204) may be used as match.
Revenue from service contracts may also
be used as local match.
While the assistance is intended
primarily for private non-profit
organizations, public bodies approved
by the State to coordinate services for
the elderly and individuals with
disabilities, or any public body that
certifies to the State that there are no
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
non-profit organizations in the area that
are readily available to carry out the
CR 2011 provides $56,579,492 to the
service, may receive these funds.
Elderly and Individuals with
States may use up to ten percent of
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310).
their annual apportionment to
After deduction of 0.5 percent for
administer, plan, and provide technical
oversight, and the addition of
assistance for a funded project. No local
reapportioned prior year funds,
share is required for these program
$56,296,595 remains available for
administrative funds. Funds used under
allocation to the States.
this program for planning must be
shown in the United Planning Work
ELDERLY AND INDIVIDUALS WITH
Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with
DISABILITIES PROGRAM
responsibility for that area.
The State recipient must certify that:
Total Appropriation ...........
$56,579,492
the projects selected were derived from
Oversight Deduction .........
¥282,897
a locally developed, coordinated public
Total Apportioned ......
56,296,595 transit-human services transportation
plan; and, the plan was developed
through a process that included
The FY 2011 Elderly and Individuals
representatives of public, private, and
with Disabilities Program
nonprofit transportation and human
apportionments to the States are
services providers and participation by
displayed in Table 12.
the public. The locally developed,
2. Basis for Apportionment
coordinated public transit-human
FTA allocates funds to States by an
services transportation planning process
administrative formula consisting of a
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
$125,000 floor for each State ($50,000
planning processes and funding for the
for smaller territories) with the balance
program must be included in the
allocated based on 2000 Census
population data for persons aged 65 and metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
over and for persons with disabilities.
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
3. Requirements
or aggregation consistent with State and
Funds are available to support the
local policies and procedures. Finally,
capital costs of transportation services
the State must certify that allocations to
for older adults and people with
subrecipients are made on a fair and
disabilities. Uniquely under this
equitable basis.
program, eligible capital costs include
The coordinated planning
the acquisition of service. Seven
requirement is a requirement in two
specified States (Alaska, Louisiana,
additional programs. Projects selected
Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon,
for funding under the Job Access
South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use Reverse Commute program and the New
up to 33 percent of their apportionment Freedom program also are required to be
for operating assistance under the terms derived from a locally developed
of the SAFETEA–LU Section 3012(b)
coordinated public transit/human
pilot program.
service transportation plan. FTA
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
elderly and individuals with disabilities
when the public transportation service
provided in the area is unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate to meet
these needs. A State agency designated
by the Governor administers the Section
5310 program. The State’s
responsibilities include: notifying
eligible local entities of funding
availability; developing project selection
criteria; determining applicant
eligibility; selecting projects for funding;
and ensuring that all subrecipients
comply with Federal requirements.
Eligible nonprofit organizations or
public bodies must apply directly to the
designated State agency for assistance
under this program. For more
information about the Elderly and
Individuals with Disabilities Program
contact Gil Williams, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
6965
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The Section 5310 program is subject
to the requirements of Section 5307
formula program to the extent the
Secretary determines appropriate.
Program guidance is found in FTA
Circular 9070.1F, dated May 1, 2007.
The circular is posted on the FTA Web
site at https://www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has administratively established
a three-year period of availability for
Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to
States under the Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program in this notice
must be obligated by September 30,
2013. Any funding that remains
unobligated as of that date will revert to
FTA for reapportionment among the
States under the Elderly and Individuals
with Disabilities Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
States may transfer Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311,
but only for projects selected under the
Section 5310 program, not as a general
supplement for those programs. FTA
anticipates that the States would use
this flexibility primarily for projects to
be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area, or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
A State that transfers Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 must certify that
each project for which the funds are
transferred has been coordinated with
private nonprofit providers of services.
FTA has established a scope code (641)
in the TEAM grant system to track
Section 5310 projects included within a
Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to
Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted, but
not required. FTA expects primarily to
award stand-alone Section 5310 grants
to the State for any and all
subrecipients.
6. Performance Measure
To support the evaluation of the
program, FTA has established
performance measures for the Section
5310 program, which should be
submitted with the State’s annual
program of projects status report on
October 31, 2011. States should submit
performance measures on behalf of their
subrecipients. Information on the
Section 5310 performance measures can
be found at https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/
circulars/leg_reg_6622.html.
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6966
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
F. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311)
This program provides formula
funding to States and Indian Tribes for
the purpose of supporting public
transportation in areas with a
population of less than 50,000. Funding
may be used for capital, operating, State
administration, and project
administration expenses. Eligible
subrecipients include State and local
governmental authority, Indian Tribes,
private non-profit organizations, and
private operators of public
transportation services, including
intercity bus companies. Indian Tribes
are also eligible direct recipients under
Section 5311, both for funds
apportioned to the States and for
projects selected to be funded with
funds set aside for a separate Tribal
Transit Program.
For more information about the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
nonurbanized population. FTA does not
apportion Section 5311 funds to the
Virgin Islands, which by a statutory
exception are treated as an urbanized
area for purposes of the Section 5307
formula program.
FTA is allocating $31,073,150 to the
States and territories for nonurbanized
areas from the Growing States portion of
Section 5340. FTA apportions Growing
States funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond
the most recent census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State
between UZAs and nonurbanized areas
based on the ratio of urbanized/
nonurbanized population within each
State in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
The Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program provides capital, operating and
administrative assistance for public
transit service in nonurbanized areas
under 50,000 in population.
The Federal share for capital
assistance is 80 percent and for
operating assistance is 50 percent,
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
except that States eligible for the sliding
CR 2011 provides $197,074,635 to the scale match under FHWA programs may
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
use that match ratio for Section 5311
(49 U.S.C. 5311). The total amount
capital projects and 62.5 percent of the
apportioned for the Nonurbanized Area
sliding scale capital match ratio for
Formula Program is $216,863,673 after
operating projects.
take-downs of two percent for the Rural
Each State must spend no less than 15
Transportation Assistance Program
percent of its FY 2011 Nonurbanized
(RTAP), 0.5 percent for oversight, and
Area Formula apportionment for the
$6,357,246 for the Tribal Transit
development and support of intercity
Program, and the addition of Section
bus transportation, unless the State
5340 funding for Growing States, as
certifies, after consultation with affected
shown in the table below:
intercity bus service providers, that the
intercity bus service needs of the State
NONURBANIZED AREA FORMULA
are being adequately met. FTA also
PROGRAM
encourages consultation with other
stakeholders, such as communities
Total appropriation ................
$197,074,635 affected by loss of intercity service.
Each State prepares an annual
Oversight deduction ..............
¥985,373
program of projects, which must
Tribal takedown ....................
¥6,357,246
RTAP takedown ....................
¥3,941,493 provide for fair and equitable
Section 5340 funds added ...
31,073,150 distribution of funds within the States,
including Indian reservations, and must
Total apportioned ..........
216,863,673 provide for maximum feasible
coordination with transportation
The FY 2011 Nonurbanized Area
services assisted by other Federal
Formula apportionments to the States
sources.
To retain eligibility for funding,
are displayed in Table 13.
recipients of Section 5311 funding must
2. Basis for Apportionments
report data annually to the NTD.
FTA apportions the funds after takeAdditional information on NTD
down for oversight, the Tribal Transit
reporting is contained in paragraph 5 of
Program, and RTAP according to a
this section, below.
statutory formula. FTA apportions the
Program guidance for the
first twenty percent to the States based
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is
on land area in nonurbanized areas with found in FTA Circular 9040.1F,
no state receiving more than 5 percent
‘‘Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
of the amount apportioned. FTA
Guidance and Grant Application
apportions the remaining eighty percent Instructions,’’ dated April 1, 2007. The
based on nonurbanized population of
circular is posted at https://
each State relative to the national
www.fta.dot.gov.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4. Period of Availability
It was administratively determined
that funds apportioned to nonurbanized
areas under the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program during FY 2011 will
remain available for obligation for two
additional fiscal years after the year of
apportionment. Any funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2013, will revert to FTA
for reapportionment among the States
under the Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. NTD Reporting. By law, FTA
requires that each recipient under the
Section 5311 program submit an annual
report to the NTD containing
information on capital investments,
operations, and service provided with
funds received under the Section 5311
program. Section 5311(b)(4), as
amended by SAFETEA–LU, specifies
that the report shall include information
on total annual revenue, sources of
revenue, total annual operating costs,
total annual capital costs, fleet size and
type, and related facilities, revenue
vehicle miles, and ridership. State or
Territorial DOT 5311 grant recipients
must complete a one-page form of basic
data for each 5311 subrecipient, unless
the subrecipient is already providing a
full report to the NTD as a Tribal Transit
direct recipient or as an urbanized area
reporter (without receiving a Nine or
Fewer Vehicles Waiver). For the 2010
Report Year, State or Territorial DOTs
must report on behalf of any
subrecipient receiving Section 5311
grants in 2010, or that continued to
benefit in 2010 from capital assets
purchased using Section 5311 grants.
Tribal Transit direct recipients must
report if they received an obligation or
an outlay for a Section 5311 grant in
2010, or if they continued to benefit in
2010 from capital assets using Section
5311 Grants, unless the Tribe is already
filing a full NTD Report as an urbanized
area reporter or unless the Tribe only
received $50,000 or less in planning
grants. The NTD Rural Reporting
Manual contains detailed reporting
instructions and is posted on the NTD
Web site, https://www.ntdprogram.gov.
b. Extension of Intercity Bus Pilot of
In-Kind Match. Beginning in FY 2007,
FTA implemented a two year pilot
program of in-kind match for intercity
bus service. The initial program was set
to expire after FY 2008; however, FTA
decided to extend the program through
FY 2010. Through this notice FTA
extends the In-Kind Match program
through FY 2011. FTA published
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
guidance on the in-kind match pilot in
the Federal Register on February 28,
2007, as Appendix 1 of the Notice
announcing the final revised circular
9040.1F, which is available at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
G. Rural Transportation Assistance
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
This program provides funding to
assist in the design and implementation
of training and technical assistance
projects, research, and other support
services tailored to meet the needs of
transit operators in nonurbanized areas.
For more information about Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) contact Lorna Wilson, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $3,941,493 to RTAP
(49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)), as a two percent
takedown from the funds appropriated
for Section 5311. FTA has reserved 15
percent for the National RTAP program.
A total of $3,350,269 is available for
allocation to the States, as shown in the
table below.
2013, will revert to FTA for allocation
among the States under the RTAP.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
The National RTAP project is
administered by cooperative agreement
and re-competed at five-year intervals.
In FY 2008, FTA awarded the
cooperative agreement to the Neponset
Valley Transportation Management
Association (NVTMA) located in
Waltham, Massachusetts through a
competitive process. The National
RTAP projects are guided by a project
review board that consists of managers
of rural transit systems and State DOT
RTAP programs. National RTAP
resources also support the biennial TRB
National Conference on Rural Public
and Intercity Bus Transportation and
other research and technical assistance
projects of a national scope.
H. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
The Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) program provides formula
funding to States and Designated
Recipients to support the development
and maintenance of job access projects
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE
designed to transport welfare recipients
PROGRAM
and low-income individuals to and from
Total Appropriation ...............
$3,941,493 jobs and activities related to their
National RTAP Takedown ....
¥591,224 employment, and for reverse commute
projects designed to transport residents
Total Apportioned ..........
3,350,269 of UZAs and other than urbanized areas
to suburban employment opportunities.
Table 13 shows the FY 2011 RTAP
For more information about the JARC
allocations to the States.
program contact Gil Williams, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
2. Basis for Allocation
1. Funding Availability in FY 2011
FTA allocates funds to the States by
an administrative formula. First FTA
CR 2011 provides $69,717,801 for the
allocates $65,000 to each State ($10,000 JARC Program. The total amount
to territories), and then allocates the
apportioned by formula is shown in the
balance based on nonurbanized
table below.
population in the 2000 census.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
3. Program Requirements
States may use the funds to undertake
research, training, technical assistance,
and other support services to meet the
needs of transit operators in
nonurbanized areas. These funds are to
be used in conjunction with a State’s
administration of the Nonurbanized
Area Formula Program, but also may
support the rural components of the
Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom
programs.
4. Period of Availability
FTA administratively established that
funds apportioned to States under RTAP
remain available for obligation two
fiscal years following FY 2011. Any
funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
6967
urbanized area, using data from the
2000 Census for individuals with
incomes below 150 percent of the
poverty level. FTA publishes
apportionments to each State for small
UZAs and for rural and small urban
areas and a single apportionment for
each large UZA.
The Designated Recipient, either for
the State or for a large UZA, is
responsible for further allocating the
funds to specific projects and
subrecipients through a competitive
selection process. If the Governor has
designated more than one recipient of
JARC funds in a large UZA, the
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
percentage split agreed upon locally,
and conduct separate competitions.
States may transfer funds between the
small UZA and the nonurbanized
apportionments, if all of the objectives
of JARC are met in the size area the
funds are taken from. States may also
use funds apportioned to the small UZA
and nonurbanized area apportionments
for projects anywhere in the State
(including large UZAs) if the State has
established a statewide program for
meeting the objectives of JARC. A State
that is planning to transfer funds under
either of these provisions should submit
a request to the FTA regional office.
FTA will assign new accounting codes
to the funds before obligating them in a
grant.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
application procedures and
requirements established by the
Designated Recipient, consistent with
the Federal JARC program objectives. In
JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE the case of large UZAs, the area-wide
solicitation shall be conducted in
PROGRAM
cooperation with the appropriate
Total apportioned ..................
$69,717,801 MPO(s).
Funds are available to support the
planning, capital, and operating costs of
Table 15 shows the FY 2011 JARC
transportation services that are eligible
apportionments.
for funding under the program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
Assistance may be provided for a variety
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
of transportation services and strategies
funds available to UZAs with
directed at assisting welfare recipients
populations of 200,000 or more persons and eligible low-income individuals to
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for address unmet transportation needs,
urbanized areas with populations
and to provide reverse commute
ranging from 50,000 to 199,999 persons
services. The transportation services
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
may be provided by public, non-profit,
States for rural and small urban areas
or private-for-profit operators. The
with populations of less than 50,000
Federal share is 80 percent of capital
persons. FTA apportions funds based
and planning expenses and 50 percent
upon the number of low income
of operating expenses. Funds provided
individuals residing in a State or large
under other Federal programs (other
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6968
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
than those of the DOT, with the
exception of the Federal Lands Highway
Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204)
may be used for local/State match for
funds provided under Section 5316, and
revenue from service contracts may be
used as local match.
States and Designated Recipients may
use up to ten percent of their annual
apportionment for administration,
planning, and to provide technical
assistance. No local share is required for
these program administrative funds.
Funds used under this program for
planning in urbanized areas must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must be included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Elderly and
Individuals with Disabilities Program
(Section 5310) and the New Freedom
program (Section 5317) also are required
to be derived from a locally developed
coordinated public transit-human
service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs. The goal of the
coordinated planning process is not to
be an exhaustive document, but to serve
as a tool for planning and implementing
beneficial projects. The level of effort
required to develop the plan will vary
among communities based on factors
such as the availability of resources.
FTA does not approve coordinated
plans.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
The JARC program is subject to the
relevant requirements of Section 5307,
including the requirement for
certification of labor protections. JARC
program requirements are published in
FTA Circular 9050.1, dated April 1,
2007. The circular and other guidance
including frequently asked questions are
posted on the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has established a consistent
three-year period of availability for
JARC, New Freedom, and the Section
5310 program, which includes the year
of apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2011 funding is available for
obligation through FY 2013. Any
funding that remains unobligated on
September 30, 2013 will revert to FTA
for reapportionment among the States
and large UZAs under the JARC
program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Carryover Earmarks. In the FTA
2010 Apportionments, Allocations and
Program Information notice, which was
published on February 16, 2010, FTA
notified recipients of 2002–2005
earmarks that any remaining JARC
discretionary funds should be obligated
in a grant before September 30, 2010. At
this time, JARC discretionary funds are
no longer available for obligation.
b. Designated Recipient. FTA must
have received formal notification from
the Governor or Governor’s designee of
the Designated Recipient for JARC funds
apportioned to a State or large UZA
before awarding a grant to that area for
JARC projects.
c. Transfers to Section 5307 or Section
5311. States may transfer JARC funds to
Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only
for projects competitively selected
under the JARC program, not as a
general supplement for those programs.
FTA anticipates that the States would
use this flexibility primarily for projects
to be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
FTA has established a scope code (646)
to track JARC projects included within
a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. All
activities within a Section 5307 or
Section 5311 grant application that are
funded with JARC resources should be
listed under the 646–00 scope code.
Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is
permitted but not required. FTA also
will award stand-alone JARC grants to
the State for any and all subrecipients.
To track disbursements accurately
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
against the appropriate program, FTA
will not combine JARC funds with
Section 5307 funds in a single Section
5307 grant, nor will FTA combine JARC
with New Freedom funds in a single
Section 5307 grant.
I. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C.
5317)
SAFETEA–LU established the New
Freedom Program under 49 U.S.C. 5317.
The program purpose is to provide new
public transportation services and
public transportation alternatives
beyond those currently required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) that assist
individuals with disabilities with
transportation, including transportation
to and from jobs and employment
support services. For more information
about the New Freedom program
contact Gil Williams, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2011
CR 2011 provides $39,203,019 for the
New Freedom Program. The entire
amount is apportioned by formula, as
shown in the table below:
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM
Total Apportioned .................
$39,203,019
Table 16 shows the FY 2011 New
Freedom apportionments.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
funds available to UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more persons
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for
urbanized areas with populations
ranging from 50,000 to 199,999 persons
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
States for rural and small urban areas
with populations of less than 50,000
persons. FTA apportions funds based
upon the number of persons with
disabilities over the age of five residing
in a State or large urbanized area, using
data from the 2000 Census. FTA
publishes apportionments to each State
for small UZAs and for rural and small
urban areas and a single apportionment
for each large UZA.
The Designated Recipient, either for
the State or for a large UZA, is
responsible for further allocating the
funds to specific projects and
subrecipients through a competitive
selection process. If the Governor has
designated more than one recipient of
New Freedom funds in a large UZA, the
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
percentage split agreed on locally and
conduct separate competitions.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
application procedures and
requirements established by the
Designated Recipient, consistent with
the Federal New Freedom program
objectives. In the case of large UZAs, the
area-wide solicitation shall be
conducted in cooperation with the
appropriate MPO(s).
Funds are available to support the
capital and operating costs of new
public transportation services and
public transportation alternatives that
are beyond those required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Funds provided under other Federal
programs (other than those of the DOT,
with the exception of the Federal Lands
Highway Program established by 23
U.S.C. 204) may be used as match for
capital funds provided under Section
5317, and revenue from contract
services may be used as local match.
Funding is available for transportation
services provided by public, non-profit,
or private-for-profit operators.
Assistance may be provided for a variety
of transportation services and strategies
directed at assisting persons with
disabilities to address unmet
transportation needs. Eligible public
transportation services and public
transportation alternatives funded under
the New Freedom program must be both
new and beyond the ADA. In a notice
of policy change published on April 29,
2009, (Federal Register Volume 74
Number 81, April 29, 2009) FTA
expanded the type of projects it
considers to be ‘‘beyond the ADA’’ and
thus increase the types of projects
eligible for funding under the New
Freedom program. Under interpretation
published in the Federal Register, new
and expanded fixed route and demand
responsive transit service planned for
and designed to meet the needs of
individuals with disabilities are eligible
projects.
The Federal share is 80 percent of
capital expenses and 50 percent of
operating expenses. Funds provided
under other Federal programs (other
than those of the DOT) may be used for
local/state match for funds provided
under Section 5317, and revenue from
service contracts may be used as local
match.
States and Designated Recipients may
use up to ten percent of their annual
apportionment to administer, plan, and
provide technical assistance for a
funded project. No local share is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
required for these program
administrative funds. Funds used under
this program for planning must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Section 5310
program and the JARC program are also
required to be derived from a locally
developed coordinated public transithuman service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The New Freedom program is subject
to the relevant requirements of Section
5307, but certification of labor
protections is not required. New
Freedom Program requirements are
published in FTA Circular 9045.1,
which was effective May 1, 2007. The
circular and other guidance including
frequently asked questions are posted
on the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has established a consistent
three-year period of availability for New
Freedom, JARC, and the Section 5310
program funds, which includes the year
of apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2011 funding is available for
obligation through FY 2013. Any
funding that remains unobligated on
September 30, 2013 will revert to FTA
for reapportionment among the States
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
6969
and large UZAs to be used for New
Freedom program purposes.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Designated Recipient. FTA must
have received formal notification from
the Governor or Governor’s designee of
the Designated Recipient for New
Freedom funds apportioned to a State or
large UZA before awarding a grant to
that area for New Freedom projects.
b. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311.
States may transfer New Freedom funds
to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but
only for projects competitively selected
under the New Freedom program, not as
a general supplement for those
programs. FTA anticipates that the
States would use this flexibility for
projects to be implemented by a Section
5307 recipient in a small urbanized area
or for Federally recognized Indian
Tribes that elect to receive funds as a
direct recipient from FTA under Section
5311. FTA has established a scope code
(647) to track New Freedom projects
included within a Section 5307 or 5311
grant. All activities within a Section
5307 or Section 5311 grant application
that are funded with New Freedom
resources should be listed under the
647–00 scope code. Transfer to Section
5307 or 5311 is permitted but not
required. FTA also will award standalone New Freedom Program grants to
the State for any and all subrecipients.
In order to track disbursements
accurately against the appropriate
program, FTA will not combine New
Freedom funds with Section 5307 funds
in a single Section 5307 grant, nor will
FTA combine New Freedom with JARC
funds in a single Section 5307 grant.
J. Growing States and High Density
States Formula Factors (49 U.S.C. 5340)
CR 2011 makes $197,074,635
available for apportionment in
accordance with the formula factors
prescribed for Growing States and High
Density States set forth in 49 U.S.C.
5340. Fifty percent of this amount is
apportioned to eligible States and
urbanized areas using the Growing State
formula factors. The other 50 percent is
apportioned to eligible States and
urbanized areas using the High Density
States formula factors.
The term ‘‘State’’ is defined only to
mean the 50 States. For the Growing
State portion of the program, funds are
allocated based on the population
forecasts for fifteen years after the date
of that census. Forecasts are based on
the trend between the most recent
decennial census and Census Bureau
population estimates for the most
current year. Census population
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6970
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
estimates as of July 1, 2009 were used
in the FY 2011 apportionments. Funds
allocated to the States are then suballocated to urbanized and nonurbanized areas based on forecast
population, where available. If
forecasted population data at the
urbanized level is not available, as is
currently the case, funds are allocated to
current urbanized and non-urbanized
areas on the basis of current population
in the 2000 Census. Funds allocated to
urbanized areas are included in their
Section 5307 apportionment. Funds
allocated for non-urbanized areas are
included in the states’ Section 5311
apportionments.
IV. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY
2011 Grants
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To
Incur Project Costs
1. Caution to New Grantees and
Grantees Using Innovative Financing
While we provide pre-award authority
to incur expenses before grant award for
many projects, we recommend that firsttime grant recipients NOT utilize this
automatic pre-award authority and wait
until the grant is actually awarded by
FTA before incurring costs. As a new
grantee, it is easy to misunderstand preaward authority conditions and be
unaware of all of the applicable FTA
requirements that must be met in order
to be reimbursed for project
expenditures incurred in advance of
grant award. FTA programs have
specific statutory requirements that are
often different from those for other
Federal grant programs with which new
grantees may be familiar. If funds are
expended for an ineligible project or
activity, FTA will be unable to
reimburse the project sponsor and, in
certain cases, the entire project may be
rendered ineligible for FTA assistance.
Grantees proposing to use innovative
financing techniques or capital leasing
are required to consult with the
applicable FTA Regional Office (see
Appendix A) before entering into the
financial agreement—especially where
the grantee expects to use Federal funds
for debt service or capital lease
payments. Consulting with FTA before
entering into the agreement allows FTA
to advise the project sponsor of any
applicable Federal regulations, such as
the Capital Leasing Regulation, and will
minimize the risk of the costs being
ineligible for reimbursement at a later
date.
2. Policy
FTA provides pre-award authority to
incur expenses before grant award for
certain program areas described below.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
This pre-award authority allows
grantees to incur certain project costs
before grant approval and retain the
eligibility of those costs for subsequent
reimbursement after grant approval. The
grantee assumes all risk and is
responsible for ensuring that all
conditions are met to retain eligibility.
This pre-award spending authority
permits a grantee to incur costs on an
eligible transit capital, operating,
planning, or administrative project
without prejudice to possible future
Federal participation in the cost of the
project. In the Federal Register Notice of
November 30, 2006, FTA extended preaward authority for capital assistance
under all formula programs through FY
2009, the duration of SAFETEA–LU. In
this notice, FTA extends pre-award
authority through FY 2012 for capital
assistance under all formula programs.
FTA provides pre-award authority for
planning and operating assistance under
the formula programs without regard to
the period of the authorization. In
addition, we extend pre-award authority
for certain discretionary programs based
on the annual Appropriations Act each
year. All pre-award authority is subject
to conditions and triggers stated below:
a. FTA does not impose additional
conditions on pre-award authority for
operating, planning, or administrative
assistance under the formula grant
programs. Grantees may be reimbursed
for expenses incurred before grant
award so long as funds have been
expended in accordance with all
Federal requirements. In addition to
cross-cutting Federal grant
requirements, program specific
requirements must be met. For example,
a planning project must have been
included in a Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP); a New Freedom
operating assistance project or a JARC
planning or operating project must have
been derived from a coordinated public
transit-human services transportation
plan (coordinated plan) and
competitively selected by the
Designated Recipient before incurring
expenses; expenditure on State
Administration expenses under State
Administered programs must be
consistent with the State Management
Plan. Designated Recipients for JARC
and New Freedom have pre-award
authority for the ten percent of the
apportionment they may use for
program administration, if the use is
consistent with their Program
Management Plan.
b. Pre-Award authority for
Alternatives Analysis planning projects
under 49 U.S.C. 5339 is triggered by the
publication of the allocation in FTA’s
Federal Register Notice of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Apportionments and Allocations
following the annual Appropriations
Act, or announcement of additional
discretionary allocations. The projects
must be included in the UPWP of the
MPO for that metropolitan area.
c. Pre-award authority for design and
environmental work on a capital project
is triggered by the authorization of
formula funds, or the appropriation or
allocation of funds for a discretionary
project.
d. Following authorization of formula
funds or appropriation and publication
of discretionary projects, pre-award
authority for capital project
implementation activities, such as
property acquisition, demolition,
construction, and acquisition of
vehicles, equipment, or construction
materials, may be exercised only after
FTA concurs that all applicable
environmental requirements have been
satisfied, including those for actions
classified as normally requiring
preparation of environmental impact
statements, environmental assessments,
and categorical exclusions found in 23
CFR 771.117(d). Other conditions and
requirements set forth in paragraph 3,
below, must also be satisfied. Before
exercising pre-award authority, grantees
must comply with the conditions and
Federal requirements outlined in
paragraph 3 below. Failure to do so will
render an otherwise eligible project
ineligible for FTA financial assistance.
Capital projects under the Section 5310,
JARC, and New Freedom programs must
comply with specific program
requirements, including coordinated
planning and competitive selection. In
addition, before incurring costs,
grantees are strongly encouraged to
consult with the appropriate FTA
regional office regarding the eligibility
of the project for future FTA funds and
the applicability of the conditions and
Federal requirements.
e. As a general rule, pre-award
authority applies to the Section 5309
Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities, the Clean Fuels Bus program,
high priority project designations, and
any other transit discretionary projects
only AFTER funds have been
appropriated or allocated to the project.
For Section 5309 Capital Investment
Bus and Bus-Related Facilities, Clean
Fuels Program, or other transit capital
discretionary projects such as those
designated in an annual Appropriations
Act, the date that costs may be incurred
is: (1) For design and environmental
review, the appropriations bill which
funds the project was enacted or the
announcement of the discretionary
allocation of funds for the project; and
(2) for property acquisition, demolition,
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
construction, and acquisition of
vehicles, equipment, or construction
materials, the date that FTA approves
the document (ROD, FONSI, or CE
determination) that completes the
environmental review process required
by the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) and its implementing
regulations. FTA introduced this new
trigger for pre-award authority in FY
2006 in recognition of the growing
prevalence of new grantees unfamiliar
with Federal and FTA requirements to
ensure FTA’s continued ability to
comply with NEPA and related
environmental laws. Because FTA does
not sign a final NEPA document until
MPO and statewide planning
requirements (including air quality
conformity requirements, if applicable)
have been satisfied, this new trigger for
pre-award will ensure compliance with
both planning and environmental
requirements before irreversible action
by the grantee.
f. In previous notices, FTA extended
pre-award authority to Section 330
projects referenced in the DOT
Appropriation Act, 2002, and the
Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution, 2003 and to those surface
transportation projects commonly
referred to as Section 115 projects
administered by FTA, for which
amounts were provided in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004,
Section 117 projects in the 2005
Appropriations Act, and Section 112 of
the 2006 Appropriations Act that are to
be administered by FTA. FTA, in the FY
2008 Apportionment Notice, extended
pre-award authority to high priority
projects in SAFETEA–LU, as of the date
they were transferred or allotted to FTA
for administration. The same conditions
described for bus projects apply to these
projects. We strongly encourage any
prospective applicant that does not have
a previous relationship with FTA to
review Federal grant requirements with
the FTA regional office before incurring
costs.
g. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5309 Capital
Investment New and Small Starts funds.
Specific instances of pre-award
authority for Capital Investment New
and Small Starts projects are described
in paragraph 4 below. Pre-award
authority does not apply to Capital
Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities or Clean Fuels projects
authorized for funding beyond this
fiscal year. Before an applicant may
incur costs for Capital Investment New
and Small Starts projects, Bus and BusRelated Facilities projects, or any other
projects not yet published in a notice of
apportionments and allocations, it must
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
first obtain a written Letter of No
Prejudice (LONP) from FTA. To obtain
an LONP, a grantee must submit a
written request accompanied by
adequate information and justification
to the appropriate FTA regional office,
as described below.
h. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5314 National
Research Programs. Before an applicant
may incur costs for National Research
Programs, it must first obtain a written
Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) from
FTA. To obtain an LONP, a grantee must
submit a written request accompanied
by adequate information and
justification to the appropriate FTA
headquarters office. Information about
LONP procedures may be obtained from
the appropriate headquarters office.
3. Conditions
The conditions under which preaward authority may be utilized are
specified below:
a. Pre-award authority is not a legal or
implied commitment that the subject
project will be approved for FTA
assistance or that FTA will obligate
Federal funds to support the project.
Furthermore, it is not a legal or implied
commitment that all items undertaken
by the applicant will be eligible for
inclusion in the project.
b. All FTA statutory, procedural, and
contractual requirements must be met.
c. No action will be taken by the
grantee that prejudices the legal and
administrative findings that the Federal
Transit Administrator must make in
order to approve a project.
d. Local funds expended by the
grantee pursuant to and after the date of
the pre-award authority will be eligible
for credit toward local match or
reimbursement if FTA later makes a
grant or grant amendment for the
project. Local funds expended by the
grantee before the date of the pre-award
authority will not be eligible for credit
toward local match or reimbursement.
Furthermore, the expenditure of local
funds or undertaking of project
implementation activities such as land
acquisition, demolition, or construction
before the date of pre-award authority
for those activities (i.e., the completion
of the NEPA process) would
compromise FTA’s ability to comply
with Federal environmental laws and
may render the project ineligible for
FTA funding.
e. The Federal amount of any future
FTA assistance awarded to the grantee
for the project will be determined on the
basis of the overall scope of activities
and the prevailing statutory provisions
with respect to the Federal/local match
ratio at the time the funds are obligated.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
6971
f. For funds to which the pre-award
authority applies, the authority expires
with the lapsing of the fiscal year funds.
g. When a grant for the project is
subsequently awarded, the Financial
Status Report, in TEAM–Web, must
indicate the use of pre-award authority.
h. Environmental, Planning, and
Other Federal Requirements. All Federal
grant requirements must be met at the
appropriate time for the project to
remain eligible for Federal funding. The
growth of the Federal transit program
has resulted in a growing number of
inexperienced grantees who make
compliance with Federal planning and
environmental laws increasingly
challenging. FTA has therefore modified
its approach to pre-award authority to
use the completion of the NEPA
process, which has as a prerequisite the
completion of planning and air quality
requirements, as the trigger for preaward authority for all activities except
design and environmental review.
i. The requirement that a project be
included in a locally adopted
metropolitan transportation plan, the
metropolitan transportation
improvement program and Federallyapproved statewide transportation
improvement program (23 CFR Part 450)
must be satisfied before the grantee may
advance the project beyond planning
and preliminary design with nonFederal funds under pre-award
authority. If the project is located within
an EPA-designated non-attainment area
for air quality, the conformity
requirements of the Clean Air Act, 40
CFR Part 93, must also be met before the
project may be advanced into
implementation-related activities under
pre-award authority. Compliance with
NEPA and other environmental laws
and executive orders (e.g., protection of
parklands, wetlands, historic properties,
and assurance of tribal consultation)
must be completed before State or local
funds are spent on implementation
activities, such as site preparation,
construction, and acquisition, for a
project that is expected to be
subsequently funded with FTA funds.
The grantee may not advance the project
beyond planning and preliminary
design/engineering before FTA has
determined the project to be a
categorical exclusion, or has issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or an environmental Record of
Decision (ROD), in accordance with
FTA environmental regulations, 23 CFR
Part 771. For planning projects, the
project must be included in a locallyapproved Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) that has been
coordinated with the State.
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6972
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
j. In addition, Federal procurement
procedures, as well as the whole range
of applicable Federal requirements (e.g.,
Buy America, Davis-Bacon Act,
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise)
must be followed for projects in which
Federal funding will be sought in the
future. Failure to follow any such
requirements could make the project
ineligible for Federal funding. In short,
this increased administrative flexibility
requires a grantee to make certain that
no Federal requirements are
circumvented through the use of preaward authority. If a grantee has
questions or concerns regarding the
environmental requirements, or any
other Federal requirements that must be
met before incurring costs, it should
contact the appropriate regional office.
4. Pre-Award Authority for New and
Small Starts Projects
a. Preliminary Engineering (PE), Final
Design (FD), and Project Development
(PD). Projects proposed for Section 5309
capital investment funds (New and
Small Starts) are required to follow a
federally defined project development
process. For New Starts projects, this
process includes, among other things,
FTA approval of the entry of the project
into PE and FD. For Small Starts
projects, this process includes, among
other things, approval of the entry of the
project into PD. In accordance with
Sections 5309(d) and (e), FTA considers
the merits of the project, the strength of
its financial plan, and its readiness to
enter the next phase in deciding
whether or not to approve entry into PE,
FD, or PD. For New Starts projects, upon
FTA approval to enter PE, FTA extends
pre-award authority to incur costs for PE
activities. Upon completion of NEPA,
FTA extends pre-award authority to
incur costs for utility relocation, as well
as real property acquisition and vehicle
purchases, which are further addressed
below. Upon FTA approval to enter FD,
FTA extends pre-award authority to
incur costs for FD activities, demolition,
and non-construction activities such as
procurement of long-lead time items or
items for which market conditions play
a significant role in the acquisition
price. This includes, but is not limited
to procurement of rails, ties, and other
specialized equipment, and
commodities. Please contact the FTA
Regional Office for a determination of
activities not listed here, but which
meet the intent described above. For
Small Starts projects, upon FTA
approval to enter PD, FTA extends preaward authority to incur costs for the
design and engineering activities
necessary to complete the NEPA
process. Upon completion of NEPA,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
FTA extends pre-award authority to
incur costs for utility relocation, as well
as real property acquisition and vehicle
purchases, which are further addressed
below. Because Small Starts projects are
not subject to approval into FD, they are
not granted pre-award authority for
procurement of rails, ties, and other
specialized equipment; the procurement
of commodities; and demolition. The
pre-award authority for each phase is
automatic upon FTA’s signing of a letter
to the project sponsor approving entry
into that phase.
b. Real Property Acquisition
Activities and Vehicle Purchases. FTA
extends automatic pre-award authority
for the acquisition of real property, real
property rights and acquisition of
vehicles for a New or Small Starts
project upon completion of the NEPA
process for that project. The NEPA
process is completed when FTA signs
an environmental Record of Decision
(ROD) or Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI), or makes a Categorical
Exclusion (CE) determination. With the
limitations and caveats described below,
real estate acquisition and vehicle
purchases for a New or Small Starts
project may commence, at the project
sponsor’s risk, upon completion of the
NEPA process.
For FTA-assisted projects, any
acquisition of real property or real
property rights must be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA)
and its implementing regulations, 49
CFR Part 24. This pre-award authority is
strictly limited to costs incurred: (i) To
acquire real property and real property
rights in accordance with the URA
regulation, and (ii) to provide relocation
assistance in accordance with the URA
regulation. This pre-award authority is
limited to the acquisition of real
property and real property rights that
are explicitly identified in the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS),
environmental assessment (EA), or CE
document, as needed for the selected
alternative that is the subject of the
FTA-signed ROD or FONSI, or CE
determination. This pre-award authority
regarding property acquisition that is
granted at the completion of NEPA does
not cover site preparation, demolition,
or any other activity that is not strictly
necessary to comply with the URA, with
one exception. That exception is when
a building that has been acquired, has
been emptied of its occupants, and
awaits demolition poses a potential firesafety hazard or other hazard to the
community in which it is located, or is
susceptible to reoccupation by vagrants.
Demolition of the building is also
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
covered by this pre-award authority
upon FTA’s written agreement that the
adverse condition exists.
Pre-award authority for property
acquisition is also provided when FTA
makes a CE determination for a
protective buy or hardship acquisition
in accordance with 23 CFR
771.117(d)(12), and when FTA makes a
CE determination for the acquisition of
a pre-existing railroad right-of-way in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(c).
When a tiered environmental review in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.111(g) is
being used, pre-award authority is NOT
provided upon completion of the firsttier environmental document except
when the Tier-1 ROD or FONSI signed
by FTA explicitly provides such preaward authority for a particular
identified acquisition.
Project sponsors should use preaward authority for real property
acquisition relocation assistance, and
vehicle purchases very carefully, with a
clear understanding that it does not
constitute a funding commitment by
FTA. FTA provides pre-award authority
upon completion of the NEPA process
for real property acquisition and
relocation assistance to maximize the
time available to project sponsors to
move people out of their homes and
places of business, in accordance with
the requirements of the Uniform
Relocation Act, but also with maximum
sensitivity to the plight of the people so
affected. FTA provides pre-award
authority upon the completion of the
NEPA process for vehicles purchases in
recognition of the long-lead time and
complexity of this activity as well as its
relationship to the ‘‘critical path’’ project
schedule. FTA cautions grantees that do
not currently operate the type of vehicle
proposed in the New or Small Starts
project about exercising this pre-award
authority and encourages these sponsors
to wait until later in the project
development process when project
plans are more fully developed and
Federal support for the project is more
certain. FTA reminds project sponsors
that the procurement of vehicles must
comply with all Federal requirements
including, but not limited to,
competitive procurement practices, the
Americans with Disabilities Act, and
Buy America. FTA encourages project
sponsors to discuss the procurement of
vehicles with FTA in regards to Federal
requirements before exercising preaward authority.
Although FTA provides pre-award
authority for property acquisition and
vehicle purchases upon completion of
the NEPA process, FTA will not make
a grant to reimburse the sponsor for real
estate activities conducted under pre-
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
award authority until the New Starts
project has been approved into FD or
the Small Starts project has received its
construction grant. FTA will only
reimburse the sponsor for vehicle
purchases through an executed Full
Funding Grant Agreement (New Starts)
or a Project Construction Grant
Agreement or single year capital grant
(Small Starts). This is to ensure that
Federal funds are not risked on a project
whose advancement into construction is
still not yet assured.
c. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Activities. NEPA requires that
major projects proposed for FTA
funding assistance be subjected to a
public and interagency review of the
need for the project, its environmental
and community impacts, and
alternatives to avoid and reduce adverse
impacts. Projects of more limited scope
also need a level of environmental
review, either to support an FTA finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) or to
demonstrate that the action is
categorically excluded from the more
rigorous level of NEPA review.
FTA’s regulation titled
‘‘Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures,’’ at 23 CFR Part 771 states
that the costs incurred by a grant
applicant for the preparation of
environmental documents requested by
FTA are eligible for FTA financial
assistance (23 CFR 771.105(e)).
Accordingly, FTA extends pre-award
authority for costs incurred to comply
with NEPA regulations and to conduct
NEPA-related activities for a proposed
New Starts or Small Starts project,
effective as of the date of the Federal
approval of the relevant STIP or STIP
amendment that includes the project or
any phase of the project. NEPA-related
activities include, but are not limited to,
public involvement activities, historic
preservation reviews, section 4(f)
evaluations, wetlands evaluations,
endangered species consultations, and
biological assessments. This pre-award
authority is strictly limited to costs
incurred to conduct the NEPA process,
and to prepare environmental, historic
preservation and related documents. It
does not cover PE activities beyond
those necessary for NEPA compliance.
For many FTA programs, costs
incurred by a grant applicant exercising
pre-award authority in the preparation
of environmental documents required
by FTA are eligible for FTA
reimbursement (See also 23 CFR
771.105(e)). When any transit project
(including New Starts and Small Starts)
is adopted into the STIP or STIP
amendment and pre-award authority is
granted, reimbursement for NEPA
activities may be sought at any time
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
through Section 5339 (Alternatives
Analysis program), Section 5307
(Urbanized Area Formula Program), and
some flexible highway funds. FTA
assistance for environmental documents
for New Starts and Small Starts projects
is subject to certain restrictions. Under
SAFETEA–LU, Section 5309 capital
investment funds (New and Small
Starts) funds cannot be used to
reimburse any activity, including a
NEPA-related activity that occurs before
the approval of a New Starts project into
PE or a Small Starts project into PD.
Only when a project has PE approval
(for New Starts) or PD approval (for
Small Starts) may it seek reimbursement
for NEPA work conducted after the
approval through Section 5309 New
Starts funds. Prior to PE approval, any
NEPA related work for New Starts or
Small Starts can only be reimbursed
through the use of Section 5339
(Alternatives Analysis Program), Section
5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Program)
and some flexible highway funds.
NEPA-related activities include, but are
not limited to, public involvement
activities, historic preservation reviews,
section 4(f) evaluations, wetlands
evaluations, endangered species
consultations, tribal consultation, and
biological assessments. As with any preaward authority, FTA reimbursement
for costs incurred is not guaranteed.
d. Other New and Small Starts
Activities Requiring Letter of No
Prejudice (LONP). Except as discussed
in paragraphs a through c above, a grant
applicant must obtain a written LONP
from FTA before incurring costs for any
activity expected to be funded by New
or Small Starts funds not yet awarded.
To obtain an LONP, an applicant must
submit a written request accompanied
by adequate information and
justification to the appropriate FTA
regional office, as described in B below.
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
1. Policy
LONP authority allows an applicant
to incur costs on a project utilizing nonFederal resources, with the
understanding that the costs incurred
subsequent to the issuance of the LONP
may be reimbursable as eligible
expenses or eligible for credit toward
the local match should FTA approve the
project at a later date. LONPs are
applicable to projects and project
activities not covered by automatic preaward authority. The majority of LONPs
will be for Section 5309 New Starts or
Small Starts projects undertaking
activities not covered under automatic
pre-award authority, an FFGA or a
PCGA, or for Section 5309 Bus and Bus-
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
6973
Related projects authorized but not yet
appropriated by Congress. LONPs may
be issued for formula and discretionary
funds beyond the life of the current
authorization or FTA’s extension of
automatic pre-award authority;
however, the LONP is limited to a fiveyear period, unless otherwise
authorized.
2. Conditions and Federal Requirements
The conditions for pre-award
authority specified in section IV.A.2
above apply to all LONPs. The
Environmental, Planning and Other
Federal Requirements described in
section IV.A.3 also apply to all LONPs.
Because project implementation
activities may not be initiated before
NEPA completion, FTA will not issue
an LONP for such activities until the
NEPA process has been completed with
a ROD, FONSI, or CE.
3. Request for LONP
Before incurring costs for a project not
covered by automatic pre-award
authority, the project sponsor must first
submit a written request for an LONP,
accompanied by adequate information
and justification, to the appropriate
regional office and obtain written
approval from FTA. FTA approval of an
LONP for a New Starts or Small Starts
project is determined on a case-by-case
basis. Federal funding for a New or
Small Starts project is not implied or
guaranteed by an LONP. Specifically,
when requesting an LONP, the applicant
shall provide sufficient information to
allow FTA to consider the following
items:
a. Description of the activities to be
covered by the LONP.
b. Justification for advancing the
identified activities. The justification
should include an accurate assessment
of the consequences to the project
scope, schedule, and budget should the
LONP not be approved.
c. Allocated level of risk and
contingency for the activity requested.
d. Status of procurement progress,
including, if appropriate, submittal of
bids for the activities covered by the
LONP.
e. Strength of the capital and
operating financial plan for the New or
Small Starts project and the future
transit system.
f. Adequacy of the Project
Management Plan.
g. Resolution of any readiness issues
that would affect the project, such as
land acquisition and technical capacity
to carry out the project.
FTA will, following the completion of
the requirements under NEPA, expedite
the issuance of LONPs for New and
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6974
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
Small Starts projects, when appropriate,
by no longer performing a detailed
review of the cost and scope of the
request in every instance. Rather, a
limited review will be performed in
those cases that are of a more routine
nature, especially those involving an
experienced sponsor.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
C. FTA FY 2011 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
The full text of the FY 2011
Certifications and Assurances was
published in the Federal Register on
November 2, 2010, and is available on
the FTA Web site and in TEAM–Web.
The FY 2011 Certifications and
Assurances must be used for all grants
made in FY 2011, including obligation
of carryover funds. All grantees with
active grants are required to have signed
the FY 2011 Certifications and
Assurances within 90 days after
publication. Any questions regarding
this document may be addressed to the
appropriate Regional Office or to Nydia
Picayo, in the FTA Office of Program
Management, at (202) 366–1662.
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit
Purposes
SAFETEA–LU continues provisions
in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(ISTEA) and TEA–21 that expanded
modal choice in transportation funding
by including substantial flexibility to
transfer funds between FTA and FHWA
formula program funding categories.
The provisions also allow for transfer of
certain discretionary program funds for
administration of highway projects by
FHWA and transit projects by FTA. FTA
and FHWA execute Flex Funding
Transfers between the Formula and Bus
Grants programs and the Federal Aid
Highway programs. This also includes
the transfer of Metropolitan and
Statewide planning set-aside funds
between FHWA and FTA to be
combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on a State’s
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
and joint planning needs. This practice
can result in transfers to the Federal
Transit Program from the Federal Aid
Highway Program or vice versa.
SAFETEA–LU was signed into law on
August 10, 2005. With the enactment of
SAFETEA–LU, beginning in FY 2006,
with few exceptions, Federal transit
programs were funded solely from
general funds or trust funds. The transit
Formula and Bus Grant programs are
now funded entirely from Mass Transit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
Account of the Highway Trust Fund.
The Formula and Bus Grant Programs
can also receive flex funding transfers
from the Federal Aid Highway Program.
As a result of the changes to program
funding mechanisms, there is no longer
a requirement to transfer budget
authority and liquidating cash resources
simultaneously upon the execution of a
flex funding transfer request by a State.
Since the transfers are between trust
fund accounts, the only requirement is
to transfer contract authority (obligation
limitation) between the Federal Aid
Program trust fund account and the
Formula and Bus Grant Program
account. At the point that the obligation
resulting from the transfer of budgetary
authority is expended, a transfer of
liquidating cash will be required.
Beginning in FY 2007, the accounting
process was changed for transfers of flex
funds and other specific programs to
allow contract authority to be
transferred and the liquidating cash to
be transferred separately. FTA requires
that flexed fund transfers to FTA be in
separate and identifiable grants in order
to ensure that the draw-down of flexed
funds liquidating cash can be tracked,
thus securing the internal controls for
monitoring these resources from the
Federal Highway Administration to
avoid deficiencies in FTA’s Formula
and Bus Grants account.
FTA monitors the expenditures of
flexed funded grants and requests the
transfer of liquidating cash from FHWA
to ensure sufficient funds are available
to meet expenditures. To facilitate
tracking of grantees’ flex funding
expenditures, FTA developed codes to
provide distinct identification of ‘‘flex
funds.’’
The process for transferring flexible
funds between FTA and FHWA
programs is described below. Note that
the new transfer process for ‘‘flex funds’’
that began in FY 2007 does not apply to
the transfer of State planning set-aside
funds from FHWA to FTA to be
combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on States
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
and joint planning needs. Planning
funds transferred will be allowed to be
merged in a single grant with FTA
planning resources using the same
process implemented in FY 2006. For
information on the process for the
transfer of funds between FTA and
FHWA planning programs refer to
section III.A and B. Note also that
certain prior year appropriations
earmarks (Sections 330, 115, 117, and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
112) are allotted annually for
administration rather than being
transferred. For information regarding
these procedures, please contact Erin
McCartney, FTA Budget Office, at (202)
366–5189 or Nancy Grubb, FTA Budget
Office, at (202) 366–1635; or FHWA
Budget Division, at (202) 366–2845.
1. Transfer From FHWA to FTA
FHWA funds transferred to FTA are
used primarily for transit capital
projects and eligible operating activities
that have been designated as part of the
metropolitan and statewide planning
and programming process. The project
must be included in an approved STIP
before the funds can be transferred. By
letter, the State DOT requests the FHWA
Division Office to transfer highway
funds for a transit project. The letter
should specify the project, amount to be
transferred, apportionment year, State,
urbanized area, Federal aid
apportionment category (i.e., Surface
Transportation Program (STP),
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) or identification of the earmark
and indication of the intended FTA
formula program (i.e., Section 5307,
5311 or 5310) and should include a
description of the project as contained
in the STIP. Note that FTA may also
administer certain transfers of statutory
earmarks under the Section 5309 bus
program, for tracking purposes.
The FHWA Division Office confirms
that the apportionment amount is
available for transfer and concurs in the
transfer, by letter to the State DOT and
FTA. The FHWA Office of Budget and
Finance then transfers obligation
authority. All FHWA CMAQ and STP
funds transferred to FTA will be
transferred to one of the three FTA
formula programs (i.e. Urbanized Area
Formula (Section 5307), Nonurbanized
Area Formula (Section 5311) or Elderly
and Persons with Disabilities (Section
5310). High Priority projects in Section
1702 of SAFETEA–LU or Transportation
Improvement projects in Section 1934 of
SAFETEA–LU and other Congressional
earmarks that are transferred to FTA
will be aligned with and administered
through FTA’s discretionary Bus and
Bus Related Facilities Program (Section
5309). The most recent guidance on
transfers of FHWA funds as allowed
under SAFETEA–LU is FHWA
Memorandum, dated July 19, 2007,
‘‘Information Fund Transfers to Other
Agencies and Among Title 23
Programs.’’
The FTA grantee’s application for the
project must specify which program the
funds will be used for, and the
application must be prepared in
accordance with the requirements and
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
procedures governing that program.
Upon review and approval of the
grantee’s application, FTA obligates
funds for the project.
Transferred funds are treated as FTA
formula or discretionary funds, except
for local match purposes as described in
c below, but are assigned a distinct
identifying code for tracking purposes.
The funds may be transferred for any
capital purpose eligible under the FTA
formula program to which they are
transferred and, in the case of CMAQ,
for certain operating costs. FHWA
issued revised interim guidance on
project eligibility under the CMAQ
program in a Notice at 71 FR 76038 et
seq. (December 19, 2006) incorporating
changes made by SAFETEA–LU. In
accordance with 23 U.S.C. 104(k), all
FTA requirements except local share,
which remains the same as required
under the FHWA program, are
applicable to transferred funds except in
certain cases when CMAQ funds are
authorized for operating expenses.
Earmarks that are transferred to the
Section 5309 Bus Program for
administration, however, can be used
for the congressionally designated
transit purposes, and in some cases
where the law provides, are not limited
to eligibility under the Bus Program.
Earmarked funds, however, can only
be used for the congressionally
designated purposes.
2. Transfers From FTA to FHWA
The MPO submits a written request to
the FTA regional office for a transfer of
FTA Section 5307 formula funds
(apportioned to a UZA 200,000 and over
in population) to FHWA based on
approved use of the funds for highway
purposes, as determined by the
designated recipient under Section 5307
and contained in the Governor’s
approved State Transportation
Improvement Program. The MPO must
certify that: (1) Notice and opportunity
for comment and appeal has been
provided to affected transit providers;
(2) the funds are not needed for capital
investments required by the Americans
with Disabilities Act, and (3) local
transit needs are being addressed. The
FTA Regional Administrator reviews
and, if he or she concurs in the request,
then forwards the approval in written
format to FTA Headquarters, where a
reduction equal to the dollar amount
being transferred to FHWA is made to
the grantee’s Urbanized Area Formula
Program apportionment.
Transfers of discretionary earmarks
for administration by FHWA are
handled on a case by case basis, by the
FTA regional office, in consultation
with the FTA Office of Program
Management, Office of Chief Counsel,
and Office of Budget and Policy.
3. Matching Share for FHWA Transfers
Section 104(k) of title 23 U.S.C.,
regarding the non-Federal share, applies
to Title 23 funds used for transit
projects. Thus, FHWA funds transferred
to FTA retain the same matching share
that the funds would have if used for
highway purposes and administered by
FHWA.
There are four instances in which a
Federal share higher than 80 percent
would be permitted. First, in States with
large areas of Indian and certain public
domain lands and national forests, parks
and monuments, the local share for
highway projects is determined by a
sliding scale rate, calculated based on
the percentage of public lands within
that State. This sliding scale, which
permits a greater Federal share, but not
to exceed 95 percent, is applicable to
transfers used to fund transit projects in
these public land States. FHWA
develops the sliding scale matching
ratios for the increased Federal share.
Second, commuter carpooling and
vanpooling projects and transit safety
projects using FHWA transfers
administered by FTA may retain the
same 100 percent Federal share that
would be allowed for ride-sharing or
safety projects administered by FHWA.
The third instance is the 100 percent
Federally-funded safety projects;
however, these are subject to a
6975
nationwide 10 percent program
limitation.
The fourth instance occurs with
CMAQ funds. Section 1131 of, The
Energy Independence and Security Act,
2007 (Pub. L. 11–140) amended 23
U.S.C. 120 increased the Federal share
of CMAQ projects to 100% at the State’s
discretion. FTA will honor this
increased match for CMAQ funds
transferred to FTA for implementation if
the state chooses to fund the project at
a higher Federal share than 80 percent.
The Federal share for CMAQ projects
cannot be lower than 80 percent.
E. Technical Assistance
FTA headquarters and regional staff
will be pleased to answer your
questions and provide any technical
assistance you may need to apply for
FTA program funds and manage the
grants you receive. This notice and the
program guidance circulars previously
identified in this document may be
accessed via the FTA Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
In addition, copies of the following
circulars and other useful information
are available on the FTA Web site and
may be obtained from FTA regional
offices; Circular 4220.1F, ‘‘Third Party
Contracting Guidance,’’ and Circular
5010.1D, ‘‘Grant Management
Guidelines.’’ Both circulars were
recently revised and can be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/
leg_reg_circulars_guidance.html. The
FY 2011 Annual List of Certifications
and Assurances and Master Agreement
are also posted on the FTA Web site.
The DOT final rule on ‘‘Participation
by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
in Department of Transportation
Financial Assistance Programs,’’ which
was effective July 16, 2003, can be
found at https://www.access.gpo.gov/
nara/cfr/waisidx_04/49cfr26_04.html/.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
February, 2011.
Peter Rogoff,
Administrator.
Appendix A
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
FTA REGIONAL OFFICES
Mary Beth Mello, Regional Administrator, Region 1—Boston, Kendall
Square, 55 Broadway, Suite 920, Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, Tel.
617–494–2055
States served: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Rhode Island, and Vermont
Robert C. Patrick, Regional Administrator, Region 6—Ft. Worth, 819
Taylor Street, Room 8A36, Ft. Worth, TX 76102, Tel. 817–978–0550
Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Regional Administrator, Region 2—New York,
One Bowling Green, Room 429, New York, NY 10004–1415, Tel.
212–668–2170
Mokhtee Ahmad, Regional Administrator, Region 7—Kansas City, MO,
901 Locust Street, Room 404, Kansas City, MO 64106, Tel. 816–
329–3920
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:01 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
States served: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and
Texas
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6976
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
FTA REGIONAL OFFICES—Continued
States served: New Jersey, New York
New York Metropolitan Office, Region 2—New York, One Bowling
Green, Room 428, New York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. 212–668–2202
States served: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska
Letitia Thompson, Regional Administrator, Region 3—Philadelphia,
1760 Market Street, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel.
215–656–7100
States served: Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and District of Columbia
Philadelphia Metropolitan Office, Region 3—Philadelphia, 1760 Market
Street, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, Tel. 215–656–7070
Washington, DC Metropolitan Office, 1990 K Street, NW., Room 510,
Washington, DC 20006, Tel. 202–219–3562
Terry Rosapep, Regional Administrator, Region 8—Denver, 12300
West Dakota Ave., Suite 310, Lakewood, CO 80228–2583, Tel. 720–
963–3300
States served: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah,
and Wyoming.
Leslie T. Rogers, Regional Administrator, Region 9—San Francisco,
201 Mission Street, Room 1650, San Francisco, CA 94105–1926,
Tel. 415–744–3133
States served: American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii,
Nevada, and the Northern Mariana Islands
Yvette Taylor, Regional Administrator, Region 4—Atlanta, 230
Peachtreet Street, NW., Suite 800, Atlanta, GA 30303, Tel. 404–
865–5600
Los Angeles Metropolitan Office, Region 9—Los Angeles, 888 S.
Figueroa Street, Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA 90017–1850, Tel.
213–202–3952
States served: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virgin Islands
Rick Krochalis, Regional Administrator, Region 10—Seattle, Jackson
Federal Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite 3142, Seattle, WA
98174–1002, Tel. 206–220–7954
Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator, Region 5—Chicago, 200 West
Adams Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606, Tel. 312–353–2789,
States served: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin
Chicago Metropolitan Office, Region 5–Chicago, 200 West Adams
Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606, Tel. 312–353–2789
States served: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:45 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6977
EN08FE11.018
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.019
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6978
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6979
EN08FE11.020
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.021
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6980
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6981
EN08FE11.022
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.023
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6982
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6983
EN08FE11.024
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.025
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6984
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6985
EN08FE11.026
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.027
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6986
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6987
EN08FE11.028
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.029
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6988
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6989
EN08FE11.030
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.031
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6990
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6991
EN08FE11.032
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.033
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6992
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6993
EN08FE11.034
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.035
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6994
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6995
EN08FE11.036
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.037
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6996
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6997
EN08FE11.038
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.039
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
6998
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
6999
EN08FE11.040
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.041
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7000
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7001
EN08FE11.042
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.043
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7002
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7003
EN08FE11.044
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.045
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7004
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7005
EN08FE11.046
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.047
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7006
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7007
EN08FE11.048
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.049
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7008
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7009
EN08FE11.050
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.051
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7010
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7011
EN08FE11.052
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.053
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7012
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7013
EN08FE11.054
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.055
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7014
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7015
EN08FE11.056
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.057
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7016
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7017
EN08FE11.058
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.059
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7018
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7019
EN08FE11.060
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.061
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7020
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7021
EN08FE11.062
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.063
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7022
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7023
EN08FE11.064
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.065
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7024
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7025
EN08FE11.066
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.067
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7026
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7027
EN08FE11.068
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.069
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7028
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7029
EN08FE11.070
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.071
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7030
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7031
EN08FE11.072
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.073
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7032
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7033
EN08FE11.074
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.075
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7034
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7035
EN08FE11.076
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.077
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7036
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7037
EN08FE11.078
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.079
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7038
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7039
EN08FE11.080
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.081
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7040
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7041
EN08FE11.082
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.083
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7042
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7043
EN08FE11.084
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.085
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7044
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7045
EN08FE11.086
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.087
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7046
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7047
EN08FE11.088
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.089
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7048
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7049
EN08FE11.090
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.091
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7050
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7051
EN08FE11.092
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.093
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7052
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7053
EN08FE11.094
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.095
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7054
EN08FE11.097
7055
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.096
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.098
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7056
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7057
EN08FE11.099
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.100
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7058
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7059
EN08FE11.101
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.102
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7060
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7061
EN08FE11.103
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.104
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7062
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7063
EN08FE11.105
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.106
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7064
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7065
EN08FE11.107
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.108
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7066
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7067
EN08FE11.109
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.110
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7068
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7069
EN08FE11.111
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.112
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7070
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7071
EN08FE11.113
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.114
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7072
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7073
EN08FE11.115
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.116
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7074
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7075
EN08FE11.117
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.118
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7076
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
7077
EN08FE11.119
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.120
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
7078
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Notices
7079
[FR Doc. 2011–2592 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am]
EN08FE11.122
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:39 Feb 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\08FEN2.SGM
08FEN2
EN08FE11.121
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 4910–57–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6958-7079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2592]
[[Page 6957]]
Vol. 76
Tuesday,
No. 26
February 8, 2011
Part IV
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2011 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program
Information; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 /
Notices
[[Page 6958]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2011 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program
Information
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) annually publishes
one or more notices apportioning funds appropriated by law. In some
cases, if less than a full year of funding is available, FTA publishes
multiple partial apportionment notices. This notice is the first notice
announcing partial apportionment of Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 formula
funds. It also provides program guidance and requirements; and provides
information on several program issues important in the current fiscal
year. The notice also includes tables that show certain unobligated
(carryover) funding discretionary programs from previous years that
will be available for obligation during FY 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this
notice contact Kimberly Sledge, Team Leader, Transit Program Management
Team, at (202) 366-2053. Please contact the appropriate FTA regional
office for any specific requests for information or technical
assistance. The Appendix at the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An FTA headquarters contact for
each major program area is included in the discussion of that program
in the text of the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2011 Available Funding for FTA Programs
A. Available Funding Based on Continuing Appropriations and
Surface Transportation Extension Act, 2011, and Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU).
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Oversight
III. 2011 FTA Programs
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
D. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
E. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals With
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
F. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311)
G. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(b)(3))
H. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
I. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
J. Growing States and High Density States Formula (49 U.S.C.
5340)
IV. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY 2011 Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority to Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2011 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Technical Assistance
Tables
1. FTA FY 2011 Appropriations and Apportionments for Grant
Programs
2. FTA FY 2011 Metropolitan Planning Program and Statewide
Planning and Research Program Apportionments
3. FTA FY 2011 Section 5307 and Section 5340 Urbanized Area
Apportionments
3-A. 2000 Census Urbanized Areas 200,000 or More in Population
Eligible to Use Section 5307 Funds for Operating Assistance
4. FTA FY 2011 Section 5307 Apportionment Formula
5. FTA FY 2011 Formula Programs Apportionments Data Unit Values
6. FTA FY 2011 Small Transit Intensive Cities Performance Data
and Apportionments
7. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5308 Clean Fuels
Allocations
8. FTA FY 2011 Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization
Apportionments
9. FTA FY 2011 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
Apportionment Formula
10. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 Buses and Bus
Related Equipment and Facilities Allocations
11. FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5309 New Starts
Allocations
12. FTA FY 2011 Special Needs for Elderly Individuals and
Individuals with Disabilities Apportionments
13. FTA FY 2011 Section 5311 and Section 5340 Nonurbanized Area
Formula Apportionments, and Rural Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) Allocations
14. FTA Prior Unobligated Tribal Transit Discretionary
Allocations
15. FTA FY 2011 Section 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) Apportionments
16. FTA FY 2011 Section 5317 New Freedom Apportionments
17. 2011 FTA Prior Year Unobligated Section 5339 Alternatives
Analysis Allocations
Appendix
I. Overview
FTA's current authorization, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient, Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU),
expired September 30, 2009. Since that time, Congress has enacted
short-term extensions allowing FTA to continue its current programs.
Most recently, the Continuing Appropriations and Surface Transportation
Extensions Act, 2011, as amended, (Pub. L. 111-322, Div. C), continues
the authorization of the Federal transit programs of the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) through March 4, 2011. It extends
contract authority for programs in the Formula and Bus Grants account
provided in the previous authorization extension Hiring Incentives to
Restore Employment Act (Pub. L. 111-147) until March 4, 2011, i.e.,
approximately 5/12th of the contract authority available in FY 2010.
This document apportions approximately $3 billion in FY 2011 funds
made available under the Continuing Appropriations and Surface
Transportation Extensions of Act 2011, as amended, hereinafter, (``CR,
2011'') among potential program recipients according to statutory
formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. This is in addition to over $4.2
billion existing in unobligated formula funds available from prior
years. The notice includes FY 2011 formula funds that are currently
available, which is approximately 5/12 or 42.47% of the amounts that
were available under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L.
111-117). The notice does not include any extension or reprogramming of
any discretionary funds that lapsed to the designated project as of
September 30, 2010. FTA will issue a supplemental notice at a later
date for any additional increments of formula and discretionary funds
that become available.
For each FTA program included in this notice, we have provided
relevant information on the FY 2011 funding currently available,
program requirements, period of availability, and other related program
information and highlights, as appropriate. A separate section of the
document provides information on program requirements and guidance that
are applicable to all FTA programs.
II. FY 2011 Available Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on the Continuing Appropriations and Surface
Transportation Extensions Act, 2011 (Pub. L. 111-322)
The CR 2011 makes available approximately 5/12ths of the contract
authority levels authorized in FY 2010 for the Formula programs. Table
1 of this document shows the funding that is currently available for
the FTA programs. This Federal Register notice includes tables of
apportionments and
[[Page 6959]]
allocations for FTA formula programs based on CR, 2011 and carryover
discretionary funds.
B. Program Funds Set-aside for Project Management Oversight
As background, Section 5327 of title 49 U.S.C. authorizes the
takedown of funds from FTA programs for project management oversight.
Section 5327 provides oversight takedowns at the following levels: 0.5
percent of Planning funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula
funds, 1 percent of Capital Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special
Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities formula
funds, 0.5 percent of Non-urbanized Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent
of the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in the Parks Program funds (formerly
the Alternative Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands Program).
The funds are used to provide necessary oversight activities,
including oversight of the construction of any major capital project
under these statutory programs; to conduct State Safety Oversight, drug
and alcohol, civil rights, procurement systems, management, planning
certification and, financial reviews and audits, as well as evaluations
and analyses of grantee specific problems and issues; and to provide
technical assistance to correct deficiencies identified in compliance
reviews and audits.
III. 2011 FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides the available FY 2011 funding
through March 4, 2011, and/or other important program-related
information for eleven FTA formula programs that are contained in this
notice. Funding and/or other important information for each of the
formula programs is presented immediately below. This includes program
apportionments, certain program requirements, length of time FY 2011
funding is available for obligation and other significant program
information pertaining to FY 2011.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(d))
Section 5305(d) authorizes Federal funding to support a
cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning program for
transportation investment decision-making at the metropolitan area
level. The specific requirements of metropolitan transportation
planning are set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303 and further explained in 23
CFR Part 450, as incorporated by reference in 49 CFR Part 613,
Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. State Departments of Transportation are direct
recipients of funds allocated by FTA, which are then suballocated to
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for planning
activities that support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area,
especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency; increasing the safety and security of the transportation
system for motorized and non-motorized users; increasing the
accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight;
protecting and enhancing the environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of life; enhancing the integration
and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, for people and freight; promoting efficient transportation
system management and operation; and emphasizing the preservation of
the existing transportation system. This funding must support work
elements and activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive
intermodal transportation planning for the movement of people and goods
in the metropolitan area. Comprehensive transportation planning is not
limited to transit planning or surface transportation planning, but
also encompasses the relationships among land use and all
transportation modes, without regard to the programmatic source of
Federal assistance. Eligible work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to management, mobility management,
planning, operations, capital requirements, and economic feasibility;
evaluation of previously funded projects; peer reviews and exchanges of
technical data, information, assistance, and related activities in
support of planning and environmental analysis among MPOs and other
transportation planners; work elements and related activities
preliminary to and in preparation for constructing, acquiring, or
improving the operation of facilities and equipment; development of
coordinated public transit human services transportation plans. An
exhaustive list of eligible work activities is provided in FTA Circular
8100.1C, Program Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and State Planning
and Research Program Grants, dated September 1, 2008. For more about
the Metropolitan Planning Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact
Victor Austin, Office of Planning and Environment at (202) 366-2996.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $39,790,936 to the Metropolitan Planning Program
(49 U.S.C. 5305(d) to support metropolitan transportation planning
activities set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303. The total amount apportioned
for the Metropolitan Planning Program to States for MPOs' use in
urbanized areas (UZAs) is $39,591,981, as shown in the table below,
after the deduction for oversight.
Metropolitan Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... $39,790,936
Oversight Deduction................................... -198,955
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................. 39,591,981
------------------------------------------------------------------------
States' apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the Metropolitan Planning program. FTA
allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to the States according to a
statutory formula. Eighty percent of the funds are distributed to the
States as a basic allocation based on each State's UZA population,
based on the most recent decennial Census. The remaining 20 percent is
provided to the States as a supplemental allocation based on an FTA
administrative formula to address planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published for each State is a combined total
of both the basic and supplemental allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for projects included in an annual
work program (the Unified Planning Work Program, or UPWP) that includes
both highway and transit planning projects. Each State has either
reaffirmed or developed, in consultation with their MPOs, an allocation
formula, based on the 2000 Census. The State allocation formula may be
changed annually, but any change requires approval by the FTA regional
office before grant approval. Program guidance for the Metropolitan
Planning Program is found in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program Guidance for
Metropolitan Planning and State Planning and Research Program Grants,
dated September 1, 2008. For more about the Metropolitan Planning
Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact Victor Austin, Office of
[[Page 6960]]
Planning and Environment at (202) 366-2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the Metropolitan Planning program to
each State remain available for obligation by FTA to recipients for
four fiscal years--which includes the year of apportionment plus three
additional years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30, 2014, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the Metropolitan Planning Program.
5. Consolidated Planning Grants
FTA and FHWA planning funds under both the Metropolitan Planning
and State Planning and Research Programs can be consolidated into a
single consolidated planning grant (CPG), awarded by either FTA or
FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to monitor individual fund sources,
if several have been used, and ensures that the oldest funds will
always be used first. Unlike ``flex funds'' for capital programs,
planning funds from FHWA may be combined with FTA planning funds in a
single grant. Alternatively, FTA planning funds may be transferred to
FHWA to be administered as combined grants.
Under the CPG, States can report metropolitan planning program
expenditures (to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and
FHWA under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for
FTA's Metropolitan Planning Program (20.505). Additionally, for States
with an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund-matching ratio greater
than 80 percent, the State can waive the 20 percent local share
requirement, with FTA's concurrence, to allow FTA funds used for
metropolitan planning in a CPG to be granted at the higher FHWA rate.
For some States, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA Regional Office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures. Current guidelines are included in Federal
Highway Administration Memorandum dated July 12, 2007, ``Information:
Final Transfers to Other Agencies that Administer Title 23 Programs.''
For further information on CPGs, contact Nancy Grubb, Office of
Budget and Policy, FTA, at (202)366-1635.
B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(e))
This program provides financial assistance to States for Statewide
transportation planning and other technical assistance activities,
including supplementing the technical assistance program provided
through the Metropolitan Planning program. The specific requirements of
Statewide transportation planning are set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5304 and
further explained in 23 CFR Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR Part 613,
Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. This funding must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning is not limited to transit
planning or surface transportation planning, but also encompasses the
relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without
regard to the programmatic source of Federal assistance. For more
information, contact Victor Austin, Office of Planning and Environment
at (202) 366-2996.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $8,312,227 to the State Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5305). The total amount apportioned for the State
Planning and Research Program (SPRP) is $8,270,666 as shown in the
table below, after the deduction for oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C.
5327).
State Planning and Research Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... $8,312,227
Oversight Deduction................................... -41,561
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................. 8,270,666
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the State Planning and Research program.
FTA apportions funds to States by a statutory formula that is based on
the most recent decennial Census, and the State's UZA population as
compared to the UZA population of all States.
3. Requirements
Funds are provided to States for Statewide transportation planning
programs. These funds may be used for a variety of purposes such as
planning, technical studies and assistance, demonstrations, and
management training. In addition, a State may authorize a portion of
these funds to be used to supplement Metropolitan Planning funds
allocated by the State to its UZAs, as the State deems appropriate.
Program guidance for the State Planning and Research program is found
in FTA Circular 8100.1C. This funding must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning is not limited to transit
planning or surface transportation planning, but also encompasses the
relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without
regard to the programmatic source of Federal assistance. Eligible work
elements or activities include, but are not limited to studies relating
to management, planning, operations, capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously funded projects; peer reviews and
exchanges of technical data, information, assistance, and related
activities in support of planning and environmental analysis; work
elements and related activities preliminary to and in preparation for
constructing, acquiring, or improving the operation of facilities and
equipment. An exhaustive list of eligible work activities is provided
in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and
State Planning and Research Program Grants, dated September 1, 2008.
For more information, contact Victor Austin, Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366-2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the State Planning and Research program
to each State remain available for obligation for four fiscal years,
which include the year of apportionment plus three additional fiscal
years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2014, will revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the State Planning and Research Program.
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal capital assistance, and in some
cases, operating assistance for public transportation in UZAs. A UZA is
an area with a population of 50,000 or more that has been defined and
designated as such in the 2000 Census by the U.S. Census Bureau. The
[[Page 6961]]
Urbanized Area Formula Program funds may also be used to support
planning activities, and may supplement planning projects funded under
the Metropolitan Planning program. Urbanized Areas Formula Program
funds used for planning must be shown in the Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. Funding is
apportioned directly to each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more,
and to the State Governors for UZAs with populations between 50,000 and
200,000. Eligible applicants are limited to entities designated as
recipients in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and other public
entities with the consent of the Designated Recipient. Generally,
operating assistance is not an eligible expense for UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more. However, there are several exceptions
to this restriction. The exceptions are described in section 3(d)(5)
below.
For more information about the Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $1,763,230,999 to the Urbanized Area Formula
Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). The total amount apportioned for the
Urbanized Area Formula Program is $1,916,008,252 as shown in the table
below, after the 0.75 percent deduction for oversight (authorized by 49
U.S.C. 5327) and including funds apportioned to UZAs from the
appropriation for Section 5340 for Growing States and High Density
States.
Urbanized Area Formula Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. \a\
$1,763,230,999
Oversight Deduction.................................. -13,224,232
Section 5340 Funds Added............................. 166,001,486
------------------
Total Apportioned................................ 1,916,008,252
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ One percent set-aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities Formula.
Table 3 displays the amounts apportioned under the Urbanized Area
Formula Program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
FTA apportions Urbanized Area Formula Program funds based on
legislative formulas. Different formulas apply to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more and to UZAs with populations less than 200,000. For
UZAs with 50,000 to 199,999 in population, the formula is based solely
on population and population density. For UZAs with populations of
200,000 and more, the formula is based on a combination of bus revenue
vehicle miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle
miles, and fixed guideway route miles, as well as population and
population density. Table 4 includes detailed information about the
formulas.
To calculate a UZA's FY 2011 apportionment, FTA used population and
population density statistics from the 2000 Census and (when
applicable) validated mileage and transit service data from transit
providers' 2009 National Transit Database (NTD) Report Year. Consistent
with 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA used 60 percent of the directional route
miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations system
to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
FTA has calculated dollar unit values for the formula factors used
in the Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money each unit of a factor is worth in
this year's apportionment. The unit values change each year, based on
all of the data used to calculate the apportionments. The dollar unit
values for FY 2011 are displayed in Table 5. To replicate the basic
formula component of a UZA's apportionment, multiply the dollar unit
value by the appropriate formula factor (i.e., the population,
population x population density), and when applicable, data from the
NTD (i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and
operating cost).
In FY 2011, one percent of funds appropriated for Section 5307, or
$17,632,310 based on CR 2011 is set aside for Small Transit Intensive
Cities (STIC). FTA apportions these funds to UZAs under 200,000 in
population that operate at a level of service equal to or above the
industry average level of service for all UZAs with a population of at
least 200,000, but not more than 999,999, in one or more of six
performance categories: passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue
mile, passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue hour, vehicle
revenue miles per capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita, passenger
miles traveled per capita, and passengers per capita.
The data for these categories for the purpose of FY 2011
apportionments comes from the NTD reports for the 2009 reporting year.
This data is used to determine a UZA's eligibility under the STIC
formula, and is also used in the STIC apportionment calculations.
Because these performance data change with each year's NTD reports, the
UZAs eligible for STIC funds and the amount each receives may vary each
year. In FY 2011, FTA apportioned $55,976 for each performance factor/
category for which the urbanized area exceeded the national average for
UZAs with a population of at least 200,000 but not more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned to UZAs, according to the
Section 5307 formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 5336, FTA also
apportions funds to urbanized areas under Section 5340 Growing States
and High Density States formula factors. In FY 2011, FTA apportions
$67,464,168 to UZAs in growing States and $98,537,318 to UZAs in High
Density States. Half of the funds appropriated for Section 5340 are
available to Growing States and half to High Density States. FTA
apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State population
forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent Census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and nonurbanized
areas based on the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized population within
each State in the 2000 census, and to UZAs proportionately based on UZA
population in the 2000 census (because population estimates are not
available at the UZA level). FTA apportions the High Density States
funds to States with population densities in excess of 370 persons per
square mile. These funds are apportioned only to UZAs within those
States. FTA pro-rates each UZA's share of the High Density funds based
on the population of the UZAs in the State in the 2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for the Growing States or High
Density formulas because the allocations to individual States and
urbanized areas are based on their relative population data, rather
than on a national per capita basis.
Based on language in the conference report accompanying SAFETEA-LU,
FTA is to show a single apportionment amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. FTA shows a single Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses separate formulas to calculate
and generate the respective apportionment amounts for the Section 5307,
STIC and Section 5340. For technical assistance purposes, the UZAs that
received STIC funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will make available
breakouts of the funding allocated to each UZA under these
[[Page 6962]]
formulas, upon request to the regional office.
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is
currently found in FTA Circular 9030.1D, Urbanized Area Formula
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated May 1, 2010, and
supplemented by additional information or changes provided in this
document.
a. Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments to Governors
For small UZAs, those with a population of less than 200,000, FTA
apportions funds to the Governor of each State for distribution. A
single total Governor's apportionment amount for the Urbanized Area
Formula, STIC, and Growing States and High Density States is shown in
the Urbanized Area Formula Apportionment Table 3. The table also shows
the apportionment amount attributable by formula to each small UZA
within the State for information purposes only unless the small UZA is
located within the planning boundaries of a Transportation Management
Area (TMA). The Governor is not bound by the small UZA amounts
published in this notice and shall determine the sub-allocation of
funds among the small UZAs. The Governor's sub-allocation should be
sent to the appropriate FTA Regional Office before grants are awarded.
In the case of a small UZA that is located within the planning
boundaries of TMA, the Governor must allocate to that small UZA, as
discussed in subsection f below.
b. Transit Enhancements
Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one percent of Section 5307
funds apportioned to UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more be spent
on eligible transit enhancement activities or projects. This
requirement is now treated as a certification, rather than as a set-
aside as was the case under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21). Designated recipients in UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more certify they are spending no less than one percent of
Section 5307 funds for transit enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year's final quarterly progress report in TEAM-
Web. The report should include the following elements: (1) Grantee
name; (2) UZA name and number; (3) FTA project number; (4) transit
enhancement category; (5) brief description of enhancement and progress
towards project implementation; (6) activity line item code from the
approved budget; and (7) amount awarded by FTA for the enhancement. The
list of transit enhancement categories and Activity Line Item (ALI)
codes may be found in the table of Scope and ALI codes on TEAM-Web,
which can be accessed at https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ``transit enhancement'' includes projects or project
elements that are designed to enhance public transportation service or
use and are physically or functionally related to transit facilities.
Eligible enhancements include the following: (1) Historic preservation,
rehabilitation, and operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities (including historic bus and
railroad facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) landscaping and other
scenic beautification, including tables, benches, trash receptacles,
and street lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian access and walkways;
(6) bicycle access, including bicycle storage facilities and installing
equipment for transporting bicycles on mass transportation vehicles;
(7) transit connections to parks within the recipient's transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced access for persons with
disabilities to mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to determine how the one-
percent for transit enhancements will be allotted to transit projects.
The one percent minimum requirement does not preclude more than one
percent from being expended in a UZA for transit enhancements. However,
activities that are only eligible as enhancements--in particular,
operating costs for historic facilities--may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects
Consistent with section 5307(d)(1)(J), each recipient of Urbanized
Area Formula funds must certify that of the amount received each fiscal
year, it will expend at least one percent on ``public transportation
security projects'' or must certify that it has decided the expenditure
is not necessary. For applicants not eligible to receive Section 5307
funds for operating assistance, only capital security projects may be
funded with the one percent. SAFETEA-LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ``capital'' projects to include specific crime
prevention and security activities, including: (1) Projects to refine
and develop security and emergency response plans; (2) projects aimed
at detecting chemical and biological agents in public transportation;
(3) the conduct of emergency response drills with public transportation
agencies and local first response agencies; and (4) security training
for public transportation employees, but excluding all expenses related
to operations, other than such expenses incurred in conducting
emergency drills and training. Activity Line Item (ALI) codes have been
established for these four new capital activities and will be used to
track the use of this provision. The one percent may also include
security expenditures included within other capital activities, and,
where the recipient is eligible, operating assistance.
FTA is often called upon to report to Congress and others on how
grantees are expending Federal funds for security enhancements. To
facilitate tracking of grantees' security expenditures, which are not
always evident when included within larger capital or operating ALI
items in the grant budget, we have established a non-additive (``non-
add'') scope code for security expenditures--Scope 991. The non-add
scope is to be used to aggregate activities included in other scopes,
and it does not increase the budget total. Section 5307 grantees should
include this non-add scope in the project budget for each new Section
5307 grant application or amendment. Under this non-add scope, the
applicant should repeat the full amount of any of the line items in the
budget that are exclusively for security and include the portion of any
other line item in the project budget that is attributable to security,
using under the non-add scope the same line item used in the project
budget. The grantee can modify the ALI description or use the extended
text feature, if necessary, to describe the security expenditures.
The grantee must provide information regarding its use of the one
percent for security as part of each Section 5307 grant application,
using a special screen in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has certified that
it is not necessary to expend one percent for security, the Section
5307 grant application must include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an application for a Section 5307
grant until the security information is complete.
d. FY 2011 Operating Assistance
UZAs under 200,000 in population may use Section 5307 funds for
operating assistance. In addition, Section 5307, as amended, allows
some UZAs with a population of 200,000 or more to use Urbanized Area
Formula funds for operating assistance under certain conditions. CR,
2011 extends
[[Page 6963]]
that eligibility until March 4, 2011. The specific provisions allowing
the limited use of operating assistance in large UZAs follow:
(1) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for grants for the operating
costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation in
the Evansville, IN-KY urbanized area, for a portion or portions of the
UZA if ``the portion'' of the UZA includes only one State, the
population of ``the portion'' is less than 30,000, and the grants will
not be used to provide public transportation outside of ``the portion''
of the UZA.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation for local governmental
authorities in areas which adopted transit operating and financing
plans that became a part of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result of the
2000 decennial census of population, but lie outside the service area
of the principal public transportation agency that serves the Houston
UZA.
(3) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the formula to be used to
apportion Section 5307 funds to UZAs with population of 200,000 or
more. SAFETEA-LU amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that stated, `` * *
* except that the amount apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area
under subsection (b) shall be available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger operations.'' This language has the
effect of directing that funds apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area, under the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 5307 apportionment
formula, be made available to the Alaska Railroad, and that these funds
may be used for any capital or operating costs related to its passenger
operations.
(4) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA-21, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction on the use of operating
assistance in a UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, by allowing
transit providers/grantees that provide service exclusively to elderly
persons and persons with disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding made available for this purpose
under Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. Transit providers/grantees
eligible under this provision have already been identified and
notified.
(5) Consistent with the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act, 2008,
in FY 2009, section 5307(b)(2) allowed: (1) UZAs that grew in
population from under 200,000 to over 200,000 or that were under
200,000 but merged into another urbanized area and the population is
over 200,000, as a result of the 2000 Census to use Section 5307 funds
for operating assistance in an amount up to 50 percent of the
grandfathered amount for FY 2002 funds; (2) Areas that were
nonurbanized under the 1990 Census and became urbanized, as a result of
the 2000 Census, to use no more than 50 percent of the amount
apportioned to the area for FY 2003 for operating assistance; and (3)
nonurbanized areas under the 1990 Census that merged into urbanized
areas over 200,000, as a result of the 2000 Census, to use 50 percent
of the amount the area received in FY 2002 Section 5311 funding for
operating assistance. CR 2011 continued these special rules for the
period October 1, 2009 through March 4, 2011.
e. Sources of Local Match
Consistent with Section 5307(e), the Federal share of an urbanized
area formula grant is 80 percent of net project cost for a capital
project and 50 percent of net project cost for operating assistance
unless the recipient indicates a greater local share. The remainder of
the net project cost (i.e., 20 percent and 50 percent, respectively)
shall be provided from the following sources:
(1) From non-Government sources other than revenues from providing
public transportation services;
(2) From revenues derived from the sale of advertising and
concessions;
(3) From an undistributed cash surplus, a replacement or
depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
(4) From amounts received under a service agreement with a State or
local social service agency or private social service organization; and
(5) Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds.
(6) Funds from Section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match Urbanized Area
Formula funds.
f. Designated Transportation Management Areas (TMA)
Guidance for setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the joint
transportation planning regulations codified at 23 CFR Part 450 as
referenced in 49 CFR Part 613. In some cases, the TMA planning
boundaries established by the MPO for the designated TMA includes one
or more small UZAs. In addition, one small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has
been designated as a TMA. In either of these situations, the Governor
cannot allocate ``Governor's Apportionment'' funds attributed to the
small UZAs to other areas; that is, the Governor only has discretion to
allocate Governor's Apportionment funds attributable to areas that are
outside of designated TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included within the planning boundaries of
designated TMAs is provided in the table below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small urbanized area included in TMA
Designated TMA planning boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albany, NY........................ Saratoga Springs, NY.
Houston, TX....................... Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-
Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The
Woodlands, TX.
Jacksonville, FL.................. St. Augustine, FL.
Orlando, FL....................... Kissimmee, FL.
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL............ Titusville, FL.
Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD......... Pottstown, PA.
Pittsburg, PA..................... Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-
Steubenville, OH-PA (PA portion);
Uniontown-Connellsville, PA.
Seattle, WA....................... Bremerton, WA.
Washington, DC-VA-MD.............. Frederick, MD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MPO must notify the Associate Administrator for Program
Management, Federal Transit Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, in writing, no later than July 1 of each
year of the identity of any small UZA within the planning boundaries of
a TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used for Highway Purposes
Funds apportioned to a TMA are eligible for transfer to FHWA for
highway projects, if the Designated Recipient has allocated a portion
of the
[[Page 6964]]
area's Section 5307 funding for such use. However, before funds can be
transferred, the following conditions must be met: (1) Approval by the
MPO in writing, after appropriate notice and opportunity for comment
and appeal are provided to affected transit providers; (2) a
determination of the Secretary that funds are not needed for
investments required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA); and (3) the MPO determines that local transit needs are being
addressed.
The MPO should notify the appropriate FTA Regional Administrator of
its intent to use FTA funds for highway purposes. Urbanized Area
Formula funds that are designated by the MPO for highway projects and
meet the conditions cited in the previous paragraph will be transferred
to and administered by FHWA.
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds apportioned in this notice
are available for obligation during the year of appropriation plus
three additional years. Accordingly, these funds must be obligated in
grants by September 30, 2014. Any apportioned funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2014, will revert
to FTA for reapportionment under the Urbanized Area Formula Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, the Governor, in
consultation with responsible local officials and publicly owned
operators of public transportation, has designated one or more entities
to be the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 funds apportioned to
the UZA. The same entity(s) may or may not be the Designated Recipient
for the Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program
funds apportioned to the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 in population, the
State is the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 as well as JARC and
New Freedom programs. The Designated Recipient for Section 5307 may
authorize other entities to apply directly to FTA for Section 5307
grants pursuant to a supplemental agreement. While the requirement that
projects selected for funding be included in a locally developed
coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan is not
included in Section 5307 as it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that in their role as public transit
providers, recipients of Section 5307 funds will be participants in the
local planning process for these programs.
D. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital assistance for the maintenance,
recapitalization, and modernization of existing fixed guideway systems.
Funds are apportioned by a statutory formula to UZAs with fixed
guideway systems that have been in operation for at least seven years.
A ``fixed guideway'' refers to any transit service that uses exclusive
or controlled rights-of-way or rails, entirely or in part. The term
includes heavy rail, commuter rail, light rail, monorail, trolleybus,
aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car, automated guideway transit,
ferryboats, that portion of motor bus service operated on exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way, and high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes.
Eligible applicants are the public transit authorities in those
urbanized areas to which the funds are apportioned. For more
information about Fixed Guideway Modernization contact Kimberly Sledge,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $706,290,063 to the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program. The total amount apportioned for the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program is $699,227,162, after the deduction for
oversight, as shown in the table below.
Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation..................................... $706,290,063
Oversight Deduction..................................... -7,062,901
---------------
Total Apportioned................................... 699,227,162
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FY 2011 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program apportionments to
eligible areas are displayed in Table 8.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
includes seven tiers. The apportionment of funding under the first four
tiers is based on amounts specified in law and NTD data used to
apportion funds in FY 1997. Funding under the last three tiers is
apportioned based on the latest available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at least seven years old, as reported
to the NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. provides for the
inclusion of Morgantown, West Virginia (population 55,997) as an
eligible UZA for purposes of apportioning Fixed Guideway Modernization
funds. Also, consistent to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA uses 60 percent of
the directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad
passenger operations system to calculate the apportionment for the
Anchorage, Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 Fixed Guideway
Modernization formula.
FY 2011 Formula apportionments are based on data grantees provided
to the NTD for the 2009 report year. Table 9 provides additional
information and details on the formula. Dollar unit values for the
formula factors used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program are
displayed in Table 5. To replicate an area's apportionment, multiply
the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds must be used for capital
projects to maintain, modernize, or improve fixed guideway systems.
Eligible UZAs (those with a population of 200,000 or more) with fixed
guideway systems that are at least seven years old are entitled to
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization funds. A threshold level of more
than one mile of fixed guideway is required in order to receive Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs reporting one mile or
less of fixed guideway mileage to the NTD are not included. However,
funds apportioned to an urbanized area may be used on any fixed
guideway segment in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed Guideway
Modernization is presently found in FTA Circular C9300.1B, Capital
Facilities and Formula Grant Programs, dated November 1, 2008.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain available to recipients to be obligated in
a grant during the year of appropriation plus three additional years.
FY 2011 Fixed Guideway Modernization funds that remain unobligated at
the close of business on September 30, 2014, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program.
E. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals With
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
This program provides formula funding to States for capital
projects to assist private nonprofit groups in meeting the
transportation needs of the
[[Page 6965]]
elderly and individuals with disabilities when the public
transportation service provided in the area is unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate to meet these needs. A State agency
designated by the Governor administers the Section 5310 program. The
State's responsibilities include: notifying eligible local entities of
funding availability; developing project selection criteria;
determining applicant eligibility; selecting projects for funding; and
ensuring that all subrecipients comply with Federal requirements.
Eligible nonprofit organizations or public bodies must apply directly
to the designated State agency for assistance under this program. For
more information about the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities
Program contact Gil Williams, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-
2053.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $56,579,492 to the Elderly and Individuals with
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310). After deduction of 0.5 percent
for oversight, and the addition of reapportioned prior year funds,
$56,296,595 remains available for allocation to the States.
Elderly and Individuals With Disabilities Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... $56,579,492
Oversight Deduction................................... -282,897
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................. 56,296,595
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FY 2011 Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program
apportionments to the States are displayed in Table 12.
2. Basis for Apportionment
FTA allocates funds to States by an administrative formula
consisting of a $125,000 floor for each State ($50,000 for smaller
territories) with the balance allocated based on 2000 Census population
data for persons aged 65 and over and for persons with disabilities.
3. Requirements
Funds are available to support the capital costs of transportation
services for older adults and people with disabilities. Uniquely under
this program, eligible capital costs include the acquisition of
service. Seven specified States (Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, North
Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use up to 33
percent of their apportionment for operating assistance under the terms
of the SAFETEA-LU Section 3012(b) pilot program.
Capital assistance is provided on an 80 percent Federal, 20 percent
local matching basis except that Section 5310(c) allows States eligible
for a higher match under the sliding scale for FHWA programs to use
that match ratio for Section 5310 capital projects. Operating
assistance is 50 percent Federal, 50 percent local. Funds provided
under other Federal programs (other than those of the U.S. DOT, with
the exception of the Federal Lands Highway Program established by 23
U.S.C. 204) may be used as match. Revenue from service contracts may
also be used as local match.
While the assistance is intended primarily for private non-profit
organizations, public bodies approved by the State to coordinate
services for the elderly and individuals with disabilities, or any
public body that certifies to the State that there are no non-profit
organizations in the area that are readily available to carry out the
service, may receive these funds.
States may use up to ten percent of their annual apportionment to
administer, plan, and provide technical assistance for a funded
project. No local share is required for these program administrative
funds. Funds used under this program for planning must be shown in the
United Planning Work Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with responsibility for
that area.
The State recipient must certify that: the projects selected were
derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human
services transportation plan; and, the plan was developed through a
process that included representatives of public, private, and nonprofit
transportation and human services providers and participation by the
public. The locally developed, coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process must be coordinated and
consistent with the metropolitan and statewide planning processes and
funding for the program must be included in the metropolitan and
statewide Transportation Improvement Program (TIP and STIP) at a level
of specificity or aggregation consistent with State and local policies
and procedures. Finally, the State must certify that allocations to
subrecipients are made on a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning requirement is a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected for funding under the Job Access
Reverse Commute program and the New Freedom program also are required
to be derived from a locally developed coordinated public transit/human
service transportation plan. FTA anticipates that most areas will
develop one consolidated plan for all the programs, which may include
separate elements and other human service transportation programs.
The Section 5310 program is subject to the requirements of Section
5307 formula program to the extent the Secretary determines
appropriate. Program guidance is found in FTA Circular 9070.1F, dated
May 1, 2007. The circular is posted on the FTA Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has administratively established a three-year period of
availability for Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to States under
the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities Program in this notice
must be obligated by September 30, 2013. Any funding that remains
unobligated as of that date will revert to FTA for reapportionment
among the States under the Elderly and Individuals with Disabilities
Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
States may transfer Section 5310 funds to Section 5307 or Section
5311, but only for projects selected under the Section 5310 program,
not as a general supplement for those programs. FTA anticipates that
the States would use this flexibility primarily for projects to be
implemented by a Section 5307 recipient in a small urbanized area, or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes that elect to receive funds as a
direct recipient from FTA under Section 5311. A State that transfers
Section 5310 funds to Section 5307 must certify that each project for
which the funds are transferred has been coordinated with private
nonprofit providers of services. FTA has established a scope code (641)
in the TEAM grant system to track Section 5310 projects included within
a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311 is
permitted, but not required. FTA expects primarily to award stand-alone
Section 5310 grants to the State for any and all subrecipients.
6. Performance Measure
To support the evaluation of the program, FTA has established
performance measures for the Section 5310 program, which should be
submitted with the State's annual program of projects status report on
October 31, 2011. States should submit performance measures on behalf
of their subrecipients. Information on the Section 5310 performance
measures can be found at https://www.fta.dot.gov/laws/circulars/leg_reg_6622.html.
[[Page 6966]]
F. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311)
This program provides formula funding to States and Indian Tribes
for the purpose of supporting public transportation in areas with a
population of less than 50,000. Funding may be used for capital,
operating, State administration, and project administration expenses.
Eligible subrecipients include State and local governmental authority,
Indian Tribes, private non-profit organizations, and private operators
of public transportation services, including intercity bus companies.
Indian Tribes are also eligible direct recipients under Section 5311,
both for funds apportioned to the States and for projects selected to
be funded with funds set aside for a separate Tribal Transit Program.
For more information about the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2011 Funding Availability
CR 2011 provides $197,074,635 to the Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311). The total amount apportioned for the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is $216,863,673 after take-downs of
two percent for the Rural Transportation Assistance Program (RTAP), 0.5
percent for oversight, and $6,357,246 for the Tribal Transit Program,
and the addition of Section 5340 funding for Growing States, as shown
in the table below:
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total appropriation..................................... $197,074,635
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight deduction..................................... -985,373
Tribal takedown......................................... -6,357,246
RTAP takedown........................................... -3,941,493
Section 5340 funds added................................ 31,073,150
---------------
Total apportioned................................... 216,863,673
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FY 2011 Nonurbanized Area Formula apportionments to the States
are displayed in Table 13.
2. Basis for Apportionments
FTA apportions the funds after take-down for oversight, the Tribal
Transit Program, and RTAP according to a statutory formula. FTA
apportions the first twenty percent to the States based on land area in
nonurbanized areas with no state receiving more than 5 percent of the
amount apportioned. FTA apportions the remaining eighty percent based
on nonurbanized population of each State relative to the national
nonurbanized population. FTA does not apportion Section 5311 funds to
the Virgin Islands, which by a statutory exception are treated as an
urbanized area for purposes of the Section 5307 formula program.
FTA is allocating $31,073,150 to the States and territories for
nonurbanized areas from the Growing States portion of Section 5340. FTA
apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State population
forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and nonurbanized
areas based on the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized population within
each State in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
The Nonurbanized Area Formula Program provides capital, operating
and administrative assistance for public transit service in
nonurbanized areas under 50,000 in population.
The Federal share for capital assistance is 80 percent and for
operating assistance is 50 percent, except that States eligible for the
sliding scale match under FHWA programs may use that match ratio for
Section 5311 capital projects and 62.5 percent of the sliding scale
capital match ratio for operating projects.
Each State must spend no less than 15 percent of its FY 2011
Nonurbanized Area Formula apportionment for the development and support
of intercity bus transportation, unless the State certifies, after
consultation with affected intercity bus service providers, that the
intercity bus service needs of the State are being adequately met. FTA
also encourages consultation with other stakeholders, such as
communities affected by loss of intercity service.
Each State prepares an annual program of projects, which must
provide for fair and equitable distribution of funds within the States,
including Indian reservations, and must provide for maximum feasible
coordination with transportation services assisted by other Federal
sources.
To retain eligibility for funding, recipients of Section 5311
funding must report data annually to the NTD. Additional information on
NTD reporting is contained in paragraph 5 of this section, below.
Program guidance for the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is found
in FTA Circular 9040.1F, ``Nonurbanized Area Formula Program Guidance
and Grant Application Instructions,'' dated April 1, 2007. The circular
is posted at https://www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
It was administratively determined that funds apportioned to
nonurbanized areas under the Nonurbanized Area Formula Program during
FY 2011 will remain available for obligation for two additional fiscal
years after the year of apportionment. Any funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2013, will revert
to FTA for reapportionment among the States under the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
a. NTD Reporting. By law, FTA requires that each recipient under
the Section 5311