Notice of Intent To Establish an Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, 5317-5319 [2011-2103]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
PART 275—RULES AND
REGULATIONS, INVESTMENT
ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
12. The authority citation for part 275
continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 80b–2(a)(11)(G), 80b–
2(a)(17), 80b–3, 80b–4, 80b–4a, 80b–6(4),
80b–6a, and 80b–11, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
13. Amend § 275.204A–1, paragraph
(e)(7) by removing the references to
‘‘4(6)’’ and ‘‘77d(6)’’ and adding in their
places ‘‘4(5)’’and ‘‘77d(5)’’, respectively.
By the Commission.
Dated: January 25, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1922 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Natural Resources Revenue
comments or nominations. The ONRR
will post all comments.
• Mail comments or nominations to
Hyla Hurst, Regulatory Specialist, Office
of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box
25165, MS 61013B, Denver, Colorado
80225. Please reference the Docket No.
BOEM–2010–0062 in your comments.
• Hand-carry comments or use an
overnight courier service. Our courier
address is Building 85, Room A–614,
Denver Federal Center, West 6th Ave.
and Kipling St., Denver, Colorado
80225. Please reference the Docket No.
BOEM–2010–0062 in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Barder, Western Audit and Compliance
Management, ONRR; telephone (303)
231–3702; fax (303) 231–3473; e-mail to
John.Barder@onrr.gov. Mailing address:
Office of Natural Resources Revenue,
Western Audit and Compliance
Management, Denver B, P.O. Box 25165,
MS 62220B, Denver, Colorado 80225–
0165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
30 CFR Part 1206
I. Background
[Docket No. BOEM–2010–0062]
The existing rule for valuation of oil
produced from Indian leases, codified at
30 CFR part 1206, subpart B, was
published on January 15, 1988 (53 FR
1184), effective March 1, 1988. Since
then, many changes have occurred in
the oil market. Also, concerns have
arisen about the need for revised
valuation methodologies to address
paragraph 3(c) of standard Indian oil
and gas leases, such as the major portion
analysis requirement for valuation of oil
production from Indian leases.
The Minerals Revenue Management
(MRM) division of the Minerals
Management Service (MMS), now
ONRR, published proposed rules for
Indian oil valuation in February 1998
(63 FR 7089) and in January 2000 (65 FR
403). Each of these proposed rules was
subsequently withdrawn because of
market changes and the passage of time.
In addition, eight public meetings were
held during 2005 to consult with Indian
tribes and individual Indian mineral
owners and to obtain information from
interested parties. Then a third
proposed rule was published in
February 2006 (71 FR 7453). Tribal and
industry commenters on the 2006
proposed rule did not agree on most
issues regarding oil valuation, and none
of the commenters supported the major
portion provisions.
The Royalty Policy Committee’s
Indian Oil Valuation Subcommittee
evaluated the 2006 proposed rule but
was unable to reach consensus about
how the Department should proceed.
Thus, MRM (now ONRR) decided to
Notice of Intent To Establish an Indian
Oil Valuation Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee
Office of Natural Resources
Revenue (ONRR), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for
nominees and comments.
AGENCY:
The Office of Natural
Resources Revenue (ONRR) is
announcing its intent to establish an
Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee (Committee).
The Committee will develop specific
recommendations regarding proposed
revisions to the existing regulations for
oil production from Indian leases,
especially the major portion valuation
requirement. The Committee will
include representatives of parties who
would be affected by a final rule. The
ONRR solicits comments on this
initiative and requests interested parties
to nominate representatives for
membership on the Committee.
DATES: Submit nominations to the
Committee or written comments on this
notice on or before March 2, 2011
ADDRESSES: You may submit
nominations to the Committee or
comments on this notice by any of the
following methods.
• Electronically go to https://
www.regulations.gov. In the entry titled
‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter BOEM–
2010–0062, and then click search.
Follow the instructions to submit public
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5317
make only technical amendments to the
existing Indian oil valuation regulations
and to convene a negotiated rulemaking
committee to make specific
recommendations regarding the major
portion provision. A final rule was
published on December 17, 2007 (72 FR
71231), addressing the technical
amendments. After publication of the
final rule, MRM (now ONRR) started the
process of forming the Indian Oil
Valuation Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee. However, the process was
delayed because of the change in
Administration. On June 8, 2010, the
Secretary of the Interior signed a
decision memorandum giving approval
to go forward with establishing the
Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee.
II. Statutory Provisions
The Negotiated Rulemaking Act of
1996 (NRA) (5 U.S.C 561 et seq.); the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2, section 1
et seq.); the Indian Mineral
Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C.
2101–2108); the Indian Mineral Leasing
Act of 1938 (25 U.S.C. 396a–g); the Act
of March 3, 1909 (25 U.S.C. 396); 25
CFR parts 211, 212; and 225; 30 CFR
part 1206; and Indian oil and gas lease
and agreement terms.
III. The Committee and Its Process
In a negotiated rulemaking, the
provisions for a proposed rule are
developed by a committee composed of
representatives of government and the
interests that will be significantly
affected by the rule. Decisions are made
by ‘‘consensus.’’
‘‘[C]onsensus’’ means unanimous
concurrence among the interests represented
on a negotiated rulemaking committee
established under this subchapter, unless
such committee (A) agrees to define such
term to mean a general but not unanimous
concurrence; or (B) agrees upon another
specified definition.
5 U.S.C. 562(2) (A) and (B).
The negotiated rulemaking process is
initiated by the agency’s identification
of interests potentially affected by the
rulemaking under consideration. By this
notice, ONRR is soliciting comments on
this action.
Following receipt of nominations or
comments, ONRR will establish the
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee
representing the identified interests to
develop the provisions of a proposed
rule. The ONRR will be a member of the
Committee to represent the Federal
Government’s statutory mission. The
Committee will be chaired by a
facilitator. After the Committee reaches
consensus on the provisions of a
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
5318
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule, as discussed in more
detail below, ONRR will develop a
proposed rule to be published in the
Federal Register.
Under 30 U.S.C. 563, the head of the
agency is required to determine that the
use of the negotiated rulemaking
procedure is in the public interest. In
making such a determination, the
agency head must consider certain
factors. Taking these factors into
account, ONRR has determined that a
negotiated rulemaking is in the public
interest because:
1. A rule is needed. Royalty payors
have considerable difficulty in
complying with the current regulations.
2. A limited number of identifiable
interests will be significantly affected by
the rule. Such interests are oil and gas
companies who produce oil and pay
royalties on Indian leases, and Indian
tribes and individual Indian mineral
owners who receive royalties from oil
produced from Indian leases located on
their lands.
3. There is a reasonable likelihood
that the Committee can be convened
with a balanced representation of
persons who can adequately represent
the interests discussed in item 2 above
and who are willing to negotiate in good
faith to attempt to reach a consensus on
provisions of a proposed rule.
4. There is a reasonable likelihood
that the Committee will reach consensus
on a proposed rule within a fixed period
of time. This objective was
accomplished with the current Indian
gas valuation regulations, which added
certainty and simplicity through the
negotiated rulemaking process.
5. The use of negotiated rulemaking
will not unreasonably delay the
development of a proposed rule because
time limits will be placed on the
negotiation. We anticipate that
negotiation will expedite a proposed
rule and ultimately the acceptance of a
final rule.
6. The ONRR is making a commitment
to ensure that the Committee has
sufficient resources to complete its work
in a timely fashion.
7. The ONRR, to the maximum extent
possible and consistent with the legal
obligations of the agency, will use
consensus of the Committee as the basis
for a proposed rule for public notice and
comment.
IV. Negotiated Rulemaking Procedures
In compliance with FACA and NRA,
ONRR will use the following procedures
and guidelines for this negotiated
rulemaking. The ONRR may modify
them in response to comments received
on this notice or during the negotiation
process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
A. Committee Formation
The Committee will be formed and
operated in full compliance with the
requirements of FACA and NRA and
specifically under the guidelines of its
charter.
B. Interests Involved
The ONRR intends to ensure full and
adequate representation of those
interests that are expected to be
significantly affected by the proposed
rule. Under 30 U.S.C. 562(5), ‘‘‘interest’
means with respect to an issue or
matter, multiple parties which have a
similar point of view or which are likely
to be affected in a similar manner.’’ As
discussed above, ONRR believes the
interests significantly affected are oil
and gas companies who produce oil and
pay royalties on Indian leases, and
Indian tribes and individual Indian
mineral owners who receive royalties
from oil produced from Indian leases
located on their lands.
C. Members
The Committee should not exceed 25
members, and ONRR prefers 15. The
ONRR will provide at least two
members plus a facilitator. The
facilitator will not count against the
membership and will not be a voting
member.
Responsibility for expenses is stated
under 30 U.S.C. 568(c) as follows:
Members of a negotiated rulemaking
committee shall be responsible for their own
expenses of participation in such committee,
except that an agency may, in accordance
with section 7(d) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, pay for a member’s
reasonable travel and per diem expenses,
expenses to obtain technical assistance, and
a reasonable rate of compensation, if—
(1) such member certifies a lack of
adequate financial resources to participate in
the committee; and
(2) the agency determines that such
member’s participation in the committee is
necessary to assure an adequate
representation of the member’s interest.
Therefore, ONRR commits to pay the
travel and per diem expenses of
Committee members if appropriate
under the NRA and Federal travel
regulations.
D. Request for Nominations
The ONRR solicits nominations for
appointment to membership on the
Committee. Members can be individuals
or representatives of organizations. An
organization should identify the
individual who will be its
representative.
Committee members need to have
authorization to negotiate on behalf of
their interests and be willing to
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
negotiate in good faith. The ONRR
interprets good faith to include a
willingness to (1) bring all issues to the
table; and (2) not to discuss the issues
in other forums. Good faith also
includes a willingness to move away
from taking adversarial positions and
instead to explore openly all relevant
and productive ideas that may emerge
from the discussion of the Committee.
Authorization for each application or
nomination must include:
1. The name of the applicant or
nominee and a description of the
interests such person will represent;
2. A description of the person’s
qualifications and expertise regarding
those interests;
3. A statement whether the
participant will be seeking agency
resources to participate on the
Committee; and
4. A written commitment of the
applicant or nominee to actively
participate in good faith in the
negotiated rulemaking and keep all
issues at the table.
E. Tentative Schedule
If ONRR publishes a notice
establishing the Committee, after
considering comments and applications
submitted in response to this notice, it
will publish a list of proposed members
as a result of the nominations received
from this notice, a solicitation for
comments on the proposed membership
of the Committee, and an explanation of
how a person may apply or nominate
another person for membership. The
notice establishing the Committee will
also include a proposed agenda and
schedule for completing the work of the
Committee, including a target date for
publication by the agency of a proposed
rule for notice and comment. Further,
the notice establishing the Committee
will include a description of
administrative support for the
committee to be provided by ONRR,
including technical assistance. The
Committee will agree on dates, times,
and locations of meetings. The ONRR
plans to terminate the Committee if it
does not reach consensus on the
provisions of a proposed rule within 24
months of the first meeting. The
Committee may end earlier upon the
promulgation of the final rule under
consideration, or if the ONRR, after
consulting with the Committee, or the
Committee itself specifies an earlier
termination date.
V. Request for Nominations and
Comments
To comply with negotiated
rulemaking procedures, ONRR invites
written comments on this initiative and
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules
nominations for the negotiated
rulemaking Committee. Written
comments are specifically requested on
the suitability of using the negotiated
rulemaking procedure to develop a
proposed valuation rule for oil
production from Indian leases.
Nominations are for all interests that
could be affected by an Indian oil
valuation rulemaking and must comply
with paragraph IV. D., Request for
Nominations, of this notice. All
nominations and written comments
must be sent to an appropriate address
as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
Certification
For the above reasons, I hereby certify
that the Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee is in the public
interest.
Dated: January 25, 2011.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2011–2103 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0860; FRL–9249–4]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara
Air Pollution Control District, Placer
County Air Pollution Control District,
Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District, and Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Santa Barbara Air
Pollution Control District (SBAPCD),
Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (PCAPCD), Antelope Valley Air
Quality Management District
(AVAQMD), and Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
gasoline bulk plants, terminals and
vehicle dispensing facilities. We are
proposing to approve local rules to
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by March 2, 2011.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2010–0860, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Grounds, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3019, grounds.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal addresses the following local
rules: VCAPCD Rule 70, AVAQMD Rule
461, PCAPCD Rule 215, and SBAPCD
Rule 316. In the Rules and Regulations
section of this Federal Register, we are
approving these local rules in a direct
final action without prior proposal
because we believe these SIP revisions
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5319
are not controversial. If we receive
adverse comments, however, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: December 21, 2010.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011–1923 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 80
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0558; FRL9260–8]
RIN 2060–AP17
Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives:
Alternative Test Method for Olefins in
Gasoline
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to allow
refiners and laboratories to use an
alternative test method for olefin
content in gasoline. This proposed rule
will provide flexibility to the regulated
community by allowing an additional
test method for compliance
measurement while maintaining
environmental benefits achieved from
our fuels programs.
DATES: Comments or a request for a
public hearing must be received on or
before March 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
HQ–OAR–2008–0558, by one of the
following methods:
Æ https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
Æ E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov.
Æ Fax: (202) 566–9744.
Æ Mail: ‘‘EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0558,
Environmental Protection Agency,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5317-5319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Natural Resources Revenue
30 CFR Part 1206
[Docket No. BOEM-2010-0062]
Notice of Intent To Establish an Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee
AGENCY: Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR), Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for nominees and comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) is announcing
its intent to establish an Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated Rulemaking
Committee (Committee). The Committee will develop specific
recommendations regarding proposed revisions to the existing
regulations for oil production from Indian leases, especially the major
portion valuation requirement. The Committee will include
representatives of parties who would be affected by a final rule. The
ONRR solicits comments on this initiative and requests interested
parties to nominate representatives for membership on the Committee.
DATES: Submit nominations to the Committee or written comments on this
notice on or before March 2, 2011
ADDRESSES: You may submit nominations to the Committee or comments on
this notice by any of the following methods.
Electronically go to https://www.regulations.gov. In the
entry titled ``Enter Keyword or ID,'' enter BOEM-2010-0062, and then
click search. Follow the instructions to submit public comments or
nominations. The ONRR will post all comments.
Mail comments or nominations to Hyla Hurst, Regulatory
Specialist, Office of Natural Resources Revenue, P.O. Box 25165, MS
61013B, Denver, Colorado 80225. Please reference the Docket No. BOEM-
2010-0062 in your comments.
Hand-carry comments or use an overnight courier service.
Our courier address is Building 85, Room A-614, Denver Federal Center,
West 6th Ave. and Kipling St., Denver, Colorado 80225. Please reference
the Docket No. BOEM-2010-0062 in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Barder, Western Audit and
Compliance Management, ONRR; telephone (303) 231-3702; fax (303) 231-
3473; e-mail to John.Barder@onrr.gov. Mailing address: Office of
Natural Resources Revenue, Western Audit and Compliance Management,
Denver B, P.O. Box 25165, MS 62220B, Denver, Colorado 80225-0165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The existing rule for valuation of oil produced from Indian leases,
codified at 30 CFR part 1206, subpart B, was published on January 15,
1988 (53 FR 1184), effective March 1, 1988. Since then, many changes
have occurred in the oil market. Also, concerns have arisen about the
need for revised valuation methodologies to address paragraph 3(c) of
standard Indian oil and gas leases, such as the major portion analysis
requirement for valuation of oil production from Indian leases.
The Minerals Revenue Management (MRM) division of the Minerals
Management Service (MMS), now ONRR, published proposed rules for Indian
oil valuation in February 1998 (63 FR 7089) and in January 2000 (65 FR
403). Each of these proposed rules was subsequently withdrawn because
of market changes and the passage of time. In addition, eight public
meetings were held during 2005 to consult with Indian tribes and
individual Indian mineral owners and to obtain information from
interested parties. Then a third proposed rule was published in
February 2006 (71 FR 7453). Tribal and industry commenters on the 2006
proposed rule did not agree on most issues regarding oil valuation, and
none of the commenters supported the major portion provisions.
The Royalty Policy Committee's Indian Oil Valuation Subcommittee
evaluated the 2006 proposed rule but was unable to reach consensus
about how the Department should proceed. Thus, MRM (now ONRR) decided
to make only technical amendments to the existing Indian oil valuation
regulations and to convene a negotiated rulemaking committee to make
specific recommendations regarding the major portion provision. A final
rule was published on December 17, 2007 (72 FR 71231), addressing the
technical amendments. After publication of the final rule, MRM (now
ONRR) started the process of forming the Indian Oil Valuation
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee. However, the process was delayed
because of the change in Administration. On June 8, 2010, the Secretary
of the Interior signed a decision memorandum giving approval to go
forward with establishing the Indian Oil Valuation Negotiated
Rulemaking Committee.
II. Statutory Provisions
The Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1996 (NRA) (5 U.S.C 561 et seq.);
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2, section
1 et seq.); the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (25 U.S.C. 2101-
2108); the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 (25 U.S.C. 396a-g); the
Act of March 3, 1909 (25 U.S.C. 396); 25 CFR parts 211, 212; and 225;
30 CFR part 1206; and Indian oil and gas lease and agreement terms.
III. The Committee and Its Process
In a negotiated rulemaking, the provisions for a proposed rule are
developed by a committee composed of representatives of government and
the interests that will be significantly affected by the rule.
Decisions are made by ``consensus.''
``[C]onsensus'' means unanimous concurrence among the interests
represented on a negotiated rulemaking committee established under
this subchapter, unless such committee (A) agrees to define such
term to mean a general but not unanimous concurrence; or (B) agrees
upon another specified definition.
5 U.S.C. 562(2) (A) and (B).
The negotiated rulemaking process is initiated by the agency's
identification of interests potentially affected by the rulemaking
under consideration. By this notice, ONRR is soliciting comments on
this action.
Following receipt of nominations or comments, ONRR will establish
the Negotiated Rulemaking Committee representing the identified
interests to develop the provisions of a proposed rule. The ONRR will
be a member of the Committee to represent the Federal Government's
statutory mission. The Committee will be chaired by a facilitator.
After the Committee reaches consensus on the provisions of a
[[Page 5318]]
proposed rule, as discussed in more detail below, ONRR will develop a
proposed rule to be published in the Federal Register.
Under 30 U.S.C. 563, the head of the agency is required to
determine that the use of the negotiated rulemaking procedure is in the
public interest. In making such a determination, the agency head must
consider certain factors. Taking these factors into account, ONRR has
determined that a negotiated rulemaking is in the public interest
because:
1. A rule is needed. Royalty payors have considerable difficulty in
complying with the current regulations.
2. A limited number of identifiable interests will be significantly
affected by the rule. Such interests are oil and gas companies who
produce oil and pay royalties on Indian leases, and Indian tribes and
individual Indian mineral owners who receive royalties from oil
produced from Indian leases located on their lands.
3. There is a reasonable likelihood that the Committee can be
convened with a balanced representation of persons who can adequately
represent the interests discussed in item 2 above and who are willing
to negotiate in good faith to attempt to reach a consensus on
provisions of a proposed rule.
4. There is a reasonable likelihood that the Committee will reach
consensus on a proposed rule within a fixed period of time. This
objective was accomplished with the current Indian gas valuation
regulations, which added certainty and simplicity through the
negotiated rulemaking process.
5. The use of negotiated rulemaking will not unreasonably delay the
development of a proposed rule because time limits will be placed on
the negotiation. We anticipate that negotiation will expedite a
proposed rule and ultimately the acceptance of a final rule.
6. The ONRR is making a commitment to ensure that the Committee has
sufficient resources to complete its work in a timely fashion.
7. The ONRR, to the maximum extent possible and consistent with the
legal obligations of the agency, will use consensus of the Committee as
the basis for a proposed rule for public notice and comment.
IV. Negotiated Rulemaking Procedures
In compliance with FACA and NRA, ONRR will use the following
procedures and guidelines for this negotiated rulemaking. The ONRR may
modify them in response to comments received on this notice or during
the negotiation process.
A. Committee Formation
The Committee will be formed and operated in full compliance with
the requirements of FACA and NRA and specifically under the guidelines
of its charter.
B. Interests Involved
The ONRR intends to ensure full and adequate representation of
those interests that are expected to be significantly affected by the
proposed rule. Under 30 U.S.C. 562(5), ```interest' means with respect
to an issue or matter, multiple parties which have a similar point of
view or which are likely to be affected in a similar manner.'' As
discussed above, ONRR believes the interests significantly affected are
oil and gas companies who produce oil and pay royalties on Indian
leases, and Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners who
receive royalties from oil produced from Indian leases located on their
lands.
C. Members
The Committee should not exceed 25 members, and ONRR prefers 15.
The ONRR will provide at least two members plus a facilitator. The
facilitator will not count against the membership and will not be a
voting member.
Responsibility for expenses is stated under 30 U.S.C. 568(c) as
follows:
Members of a negotiated rulemaking committee shall be
responsible for their own expenses of participation in such
committee, except that an agency may, in accordance with section
7(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, pay for a member's
reasonable travel and per diem expenses, expenses to obtain
technical assistance, and a reasonable rate of compensation, if--
(1) such member certifies a lack of adequate financial resources
to participate in the committee; and
(2) the agency determines that such member's participation in
the committee is necessary to assure an adequate representation of
the member's interest.
Therefore, ONRR commits to pay the travel and per diem expenses of
Committee members if appropriate under the NRA and Federal travel
regulations.
D. Request for Nominations
The ONRR solicits nominations for appointment to membership on the
Committee. Members can be individuals or representatives of
organizations. An organization should identify the individual who will
be its representative.
Committee members need to have authorization to negotiate on behalf
of their interests and be willing to negotiate in good faith. The ONRR
interprets good faith to include a willingness to (1) bring all issues
to the table; and (2) not to discuss the issues in other forums. Good
faith also includes a willingness to move away from taking adversarial
positions and instead to explore openly all relevant and productive
ideas that may emerge from the discussion of the Committee.
Authorization for each application or nomination must include:
1. The name of the applicant or nominee and a description of the
interests such person will represent;
2. A description of the person's qualifications and expertise
regarding those interests;
3. A statement whether the participant will be seeking agency
resources to participate on the Committee; and
4. A written commitment of the applicant or nominee to actively
participate in good faith in the negotiated rulemaking and keep all
issues at the table.
E. Tentative Schedule
If ONRR publishes a notice establishing the Committee, after
considering comments and applications submitted in response to this
notice, it will publish a list of proposed members as a result of the
nominations received from this notice, a solicitation for comments on
the proposed membership of the Committee, and an explanation of how a
person may apply or nominate another person for membership. The notice
establishing the Committee will also include a proposed agenda and
schedule for completing the work of the Committee, including a target
date for publication by the agency of a proposed rule for notice and
comment. Further, the notice establishing the Committee will include a
description of administrative support for the committee to be provided
by ONRR, including technical assistance. The Committee will agree on
dates, times, and locations of meetings. The ONRR plans to terminate
the Committee if it does not reach consensus on the provisions of a
proposed rule within 24 months of the first meeting. The Committee may
end earlier upon the promulgation of the final rule under
consideration, or if the ONRR, after consulting with the Committee, or
the Committee itself specifies an earlier termination date.
V. Request for Nominations and Comments
To comply with negotiated rulemaking procedures, ONRR invites
written comments on this initiative and
[[Page 5319]]
nominations for the negotiated rulemaking Committee. Written comments
are specifically requested on the suitability of using the negotiated
rulemaking procedure to develop a proposed valuation rule for oil
production from Indian leases. Nominations are for all interests that
could be affected by an Indian oil valuation rulemaking and must comply
with paragraph IV. D., Request for Nominations, of this notice. All
nominations and written comments must be sent to an appropriate address
as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Certification
For the above reasons, I hereby certify that the Indian Oil
Valuation Negotiated Rulemaking Committee is in the public interest.
Dated: January 25, 2011.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2011-2103 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P