Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 5425-5427 [2011-2091]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
industry, shipping industry, safety
advocates, labor, and safety enforcement
officials. Representatives of a single
enumerated interest group may not
constitute a majority of the Committee
members. The Administrator designates
a chairman of the Committee from
among the members.
Committee members must not be
officers or employees of the Federal
Government and serve without pay. The
Administrator may allow a member,
when attending meetings of the
Committee or a subcommittee,
reimbursement of expenses authorized
under Section 5703 of Title 5, United
States Code and the Federal Travel
Regulation, 41 CFR part 301, relating to
per diem, travel, and transportation.
The President’s Memorandum of June
18, 2010, concerning lobbyists on
Agency boards and commissions (75 FR
35995, 6/23/10) directed the heads of
Executive departments and agencies
‘‘not to make any new appointments or
reappointments of federally registered
lobbyists to advisory committees and
other boards and commissions.’’
Pursuant to the President’s directive,
FMCSA will not consider for
appointment to the MCSAC any
individual who is subject to the
registration and reporting requirements
of the Lobbying Disclosure Act (2 U.S.C.
1605).
The Designated Federal Officer
anticipates calling Committee meetings
approximately four times each year.
Meetings are open to the general public,
except as provided under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5
U.S.C. App.). Notice of each meeting is
published in the Federal Register at
least 15 calendar days prior to the date
of the meeting.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Request for Nominations
The FMCSA seeks nominations for
membership to the MCSAC from among
its stakeholder groups for
representatives with specialized
experience, education, or training in
commercial motor vehicle safety issues.
The Agency is required under FACA to
appoint members of diverse views and
interests to ensure the committee is
balanced with appropriate consideration
of background. All Committee members
must be able to attend at least three to
four meetings each year in person or by
teleconference. Interested persons
should have a commitment to
transportation safety, knowledge of
transportation issues, experience on
panels that deal with transportation
safety, and a record of collaboration and
professional experience in commercial
motor vehicle safety issues.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
On-line applications will be accepted
for positions on the MCSAC.
Applications may be obtained from the
MCSAC Web site at https://
mcsac.fmcsa.dot.gov/, completed online, and e-mailed to Shannon L.
Watson, MCSAC liaison, at
Shannon.Watson@dot.gov. The Web site
contains additional information on the
MCSAC, including reports, meeting
minutes, and membership information.
Nominations must be received on or
before March 2, 2011.
Issued on: January 21, 2011.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–2104 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0385]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 24 individuals from
the vision requirement in the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). The exemptions will enable
these individuals to operate commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate
commerce without meeting the
prescribed vision standard. The Agency
has concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level of safety maintained without the
exemptions for these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
January 31, 2011. The exemptions
expire on January 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202)–366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5425
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
FDMS is available 24 hours each day,
365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or of the person signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s Privacy Act
Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17,
2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/
E8–785.pdf.
Background
On December 14, 2010, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of
exemption applications from certain
individuals, and requested comments
from the public (75 FR 77942). That
notice listed 24 applicants’ case
histories. The 24 individuals applied for
exemptions from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period.
Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the
24 applications on their merits and
made a determination to grant
exemptions to each of them.
Vision and Driving Experience of the
Applicants
The vision requirement in the
FMCSRs provides:
A person is physically qualified to
drive a commercial motor vehicle if that
person has distant visual acuity of at
least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses or visual
acuity separately corrected to 20/40
(Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least
20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
5426
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
without corrective lenses, field of vision
of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian
in each eye, and the ability to recognize
the colors of traffic signals and devices
showing standard red, green, and amber
(49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)).
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers
do not meet the vision standard, but
have adapted their driving to
accommodate their vision limitation
and demonstrated their ability to drive
safely. The 24 exemption applicants
listed in this notice are in this category.
They are unable to meet the vision
standard in one eye for various reasons,
including amblyopia, complete loss of
vision, retinal detachment, macular
degeneration, aphakia, corneal scarring,
traumatic neuropathy, optic neuropathy,
macular scarring, displaced pupil, and
prosthesis. In most cases, their eye
conditions were not recently developed.
17 of the applicants were either born
with their vision impairments or have
had them since childhood. The 7
individuals who sustained their vision
conditions as adults have had them for
periods ranging from 9 to 45 years.
Although each applicant has one eye
which does not meet the vision standard
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at
least 20/40 corrected vision in the other
eye, and in a doctor’s opinion, has
sufficient vision to perform all the tasks
necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors’
opinions are supported by the
applicants’ possession of valid
commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) or
non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to
knowledge and skills tests designed to
evaluate their qualifications to operate a
CMV.
All of these applicants satisfied the
testing standards for their State of
residence. By meeting State licensing
requirements, the applicants
demonstrated their ability to operate a
commercial vehicle, with their limited
vision, to the satisfaction of the State.
While possessing a valid CDL or nonCDL, these 24 drivers have been
authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate
commerce, even though their vision
disqualified them from driving in
interstate commerce. They have driven
CMVs with their limited vision for
careers ranging from 31⁄2 to 50 years. In
the past 3 years, 6 of the drivers were
involved in crashes or convicted of
moving violations in a CMV.
The qualifications, experience, and
medical condition of each applicant
were stated and discussed in detail in
the December 14, 2010 notice (75 FR
77942).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely
to achieve an equivalent or greater level
of safety than would be achieved
without the exemption. Without the
exemption, applicants will continue to
be restricted to intrastate driving. With
the exemption, applicants can drive in
interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis
focuses on whether an equal or greater
level of safety is likely to be achieved by
permitting each of these drivers to drive
in interstate commerce as opposed to
restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered not only the medical reports
about the applicants’ vision, but also
their driving records and experience
with the vision deficiency.
To qualify for an exemption from the
vision standard, FMCSA requires a
person to present verifiable evidence
that he/she has driven a commercial
vehicle safely with the vision deficiency
for the past 3 years. Recent driving
performance is especially important in
evaluating future safety, according to
several research studies designed to
correlate past and future driving
performance. Results of these studies
support the principle that the best
predictor of future performance by a
driver is his/her past record of crashes
and traffic violations. Copies of the
studies may be found at Docket Number
FMCSA–1998–3637.
We believe we can properly apply the
principle to monocular drivers, because
data from the Federal Highway
Administration’s (FHWA) former waiver
study program clearly demonstrate the
driving performance of experienced
monocular drivers in the program is
better than that of all CMV drivers
collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345,
March 26, 1996). The fact that
experienced monocular drivers
demonstrated safe driving records in the
waiver program supports a conclusion
that other monocular drivers, meeting
the same qualifying conditions as those
required by the waiver program, are also
likely to have adapted to their vision
deficiency and will continue to operate
safely.
The first major research correlating
past and future performance was done
in England by Greenwood and Yule in
1920. Subsequent studies, building on
that model, concluded that crash rates
for the same individual exposed to
certain risks for two different time
periods vary only slightly (See Bates
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952).
Other studies demonstrated theories of
predicting crash proneness from crash
history coupled with other factors.
These factors—such as age, sex,
geographic location, mileage driven and
conviction history—are used every day
by insurance companies and motor
vehicle bureaus to predict the
probability of an individual
experiencing future crashes (See Weber,
Donald C., ‘‘Accident Rate Potential: An
Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,’’ Journal
of American Statistical Association,
June 1971). A 1964 California Driver
Record Study prepared by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles
concluded that the best overall crash
predictor for both concurrent and
nonconcurrent events is the number of
single convictions. This study used 3
consecutive years of data, comparing the
experiences of drivers in the first 2 years
with their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these
studies to the past 3-year record of the
24 applicants, four of the applicants
were convicted for a moving violation
and three of the applicants were
involved in a crash. All the applicants
achieved a record of safety while
driving with their vision impairment,
demonstrating the likelihood that they
have adapted their driving skills to
accommodate their condition. As the
applicants’ ample driving histories with
their vision deficiencies are good
predictors of future performance,
FMCSA concludes their ability to drive
safely can be projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants’
intrastate driving experience and history
provide an adequate basis for predicting
their ability to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Intrastate driving, like
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the
interstate system and on other roads
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas
exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on
interstate highways. Faster reaction to
traffic and traffic signals is generally
required because distances between
them are more compact. These
conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as
interstate driving conditions. The
veteran drivers in this proceeding have
operated CMVs safely under those
conditions for at least 3 years, most for
much longer. Their experience and
driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in
interstate commerce as safely as he/she
has been performing in intrastate
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 20 / Monday, January 31, 2011 / Notices
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds
that exempting these applicants from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption. For this reason, the
Agency is granting the exemptions for
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to the 24 applicants
listed in the notice of December 14,
2010 (75 FR 77942).
We recognize that the vision of an
applicant may change and affect his/her
ability to operate a CMV as safely as in
the past. As a condition of the
exemption, therefore, FMCSA will
impose requirements on the 24
individuals consistent with the
grandfathering provisions applied to
drivers who participated in the
Agency’s vision waiver program.
Those requirements are found at 49
CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following: (1) That each individual be
physically examined every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who
attests that the vision in the better eye
continues to meet the standard in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a medical
examiner who attests that the individual
is otherwise physically qualified under
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (3) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this
proceeding. The comment was
considered and discussed below.
The Pennsylvania Department of
Transportation stated that it was in
favor of granting a Federal vision
exemption to Bobby Sawyers.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 24
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts, Gary S. Alvarez, Wayne D.
Bost, James M. Brasher, Marcus L.
Conner, Joseph L. Dahlman, Brett K.
Hasty, Fredrick A. Irby, Matthew B.
Lairamore, Garry D. Layton, Boynton L.
Manuel, Anthony W. Miller, Wesley G.
Moore, Rocky Moorhead, Gary J.
Peterson, Bernard J. Phillips, Michael J.
Roberts, Alvaro F. Rodriguez, Bobby W.
Sawyers, Lynn R. Schraeder, John R.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:38 Jan 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Shaver, Myron A. Smith, Ricky L. Watts,
Cameron R. Whitford, and Olen L.
Williams, Jr. from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
subject to the requirements cited above
(49 CFR 391.64(b)).
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each exemption will be valid
for 2 years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the
exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the
end of the 2-year period, the person may
apply to FMCSA for a renewal under
procedures in effect at that time.
Issued on: January 26, 2011.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–2091 Filed 1–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
TIGGER and Clean Fuels Grant
Program Funds
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: TIGGER and Clean Fuels Grant
Program Announcement of Project
Selections.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) announces the
selection of projects funded in support
of the Transit Investments for
Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction
(TIGGER) program and Clean Fuels
Grant program which is enhanced with
Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facilities
program funds. This funding supports
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
environmental sustainability efforts,
which were announced in FTA’s notice
of funding availability (NOFA) on April
13, 2010. The TIGGER program makes
funds available for capital investments
that will reduce the energy consumption
or greenhouse gas emissions of public
transportation systems. The Clean Fuels
Grant program makes funds available to
assist nonattainment and maintenance
areas in achieving or maintaining the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
for ozone and carbon monoxide and
supports emerging clean fuel and
advanced propulsion technologies for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5427
transit buses and markets for those
technologies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Successful applicants should contact
the appropriate FTA Regional office
(Appendix) for specific information
regarding applying for the funds or
proposal specific questions. For general
program information on TIGGER,
contact Walter Kulyk, Office of Mobility
Innovation, (202) 366–4995, e-mail:
walter.kulyk@dot.gov. For general
program information on the Clean Fuels
Grant program, contact Vanessa
Williams, Office of Program
Management, at (202) 366–4818, e-mail:
vanessa.williams@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A total of
$75 million was available for FTA’s
TIGGER program and $81 million for
the Clean Fuels Grant program. In
response to the NOFA, FTA received a
total of 274 proposals requesting over
$1.4 billion in program funds. The
project proposals were evaluated based
on the criteria detailed in the April 13,
2010 Notice of Funding Availability.
Projects funded with Clean Fuels Grant
and Bus program funds are included in
Table 1. Projects funded with the
TIGGER program funds are included in
Table 2. Grantees selected for
competitive discretionary funding
should work with their FTA regional
office to finalize the application in
FTA’s Transportation Electronic Award
Management (TEAM) system, so that
funds can be obligated expeditiously.
Funds must be used for the purposes
specified in the competitive application.
Clean Fuels and Bus projects can be
funded at up to 83 percent Federal share
for eligible vehicle purchases. The 83
percent share is a blended figure
representing 80 percent of the vehicle
and 90 percent of the vehicle-related
equipment to be acquired in compliance
with the Clean Air Act. The 83 percent
share does not apply to facilities, for
which the costs are more variable. The
eligibility of facility-related cost element
at the 90 percent share will be reviewed
for eligibility of the higher Federal share
on a case-by-case basis as part of the
grant application process. The FY 2010
Appropriations Act allows a 90 percent
Federal share for total cost of a biodiesel
bus and 90 percent Federal share for the
net capital cost of factory installed
hybrid electric propulsion systems and
any equipment related to such a system.
TIGGER projects can be funded at up to
100 percent Federal share. A
discretionary project identification
number has been assigned to each
project for tracking purposes and must
be used in the TEAM application.
Selected projects have pre-award
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5425-5427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2091]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0385]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 24 individuals from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without meeting
the prescribed vision standard. The Agency has concluded that granting
these exemptions will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to,
or greater than, the level of safety maintained without the exemptions
for these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions are effective January 31, 2011. The exemptions
expire on January 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202)-366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
Background
On December 14, 2010, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of
exemption applications from certain individuals, and requested comments
from the public (75 FR 77942). That notice listed 24 applicants' case
histories. The 24 individuals applied for exemptions from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period.
Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the 24 applications on their merits
and made a determination to grant exemptions to each of them.
Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides:
A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor
vehicle if that person has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40
(Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or visual acuity
separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both
eyes with or
[[Page 5426]]
without corrective lenses, field of vision of at least 70[deg] in the
horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability to recognize the
colors of traffic signals and devices showing standard red, green, and
amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)).
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision standard,
but have adapted their driving to accommodate their vision limitation
and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 24 exemption
applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They are unable
to meet the vision standard in one eye for various reasons, including
amblyopia, complete loss of vision, retinal detachment, macular
degeneration, aphakia, corneal scarring, traumatic neuropathy, optic
neuropathy, macular scarring, displaced pupil, and prosthesis. In most
cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed. 17 of the
applicants were either born with their vision impairments or have had
them since childhood. The 7 individuals who sustained their vision
conditions as adults have had them for periods ranging from 9 to 45
years.
Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected
vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient
vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors'
opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid
commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before
issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests
designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV.
All of these applicants satisfied the testing standards for their
State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the
applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a commercial vehicle,
with their limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State. While
possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these 24 drivers have been
authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their
vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have
driven CMVs with their limited vision for careers ranging from 3\1/2\
to 50 years. In the past 3 years, 6 of the drivers were involved in
crashes or convicted of moving violations in a CMV.
The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each
applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the December 14, 2010
notice (75 FR 77942).
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is
likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would
be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants
will continue to be restricted to intrastate driving. With the
exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our
analysis focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is
likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in
interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in
intrastate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered not only the medical reports about the applicants' vision,
but also their driving records and experience with the vision
deficiency.
To qualify for an exemption from the vision standard, FMCSA
requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven
a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past 3
years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating
future safety, according to several research studies designed to
correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies
support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by
a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations.
Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA-1998-3637.
We believe we can properly apply the principle to monocular
drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA)
former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance
of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of
all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996).
The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving
records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other
monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those
required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to
their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely.
The first major research correlating past and future performance
was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies,
building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same
individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary
only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California
Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated
theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with
other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location,
mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance
companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an
individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C.,
``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression
Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical
Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared
by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best
overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is
the number of single convictions. This study used 3 consecutive years
of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first 2 years with
their experiences in the final year.
Applying principles from these studies to the past 3-year record of
the 24 applicants, four of the applicants were convicted for a moving
violation and three of the applicants were involved in a crash. All the
applicants achieved a record of safety while driving with their vision
impairment, demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their
driving skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample
driving histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of
future performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can
be projected into the future.
We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and
history provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive
safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate
operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate
system and on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster
reaction to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because
distances between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual
capacity and driver response just as intensely as interstate driving
conditions. The veteran drivers in this proceeding have operated CMVs
safely under those conditions for at least 3 years, most for much
longer. Their experience and driving records lead us to believe that
each applicant is capable of operating in interstate commerce as safely
as he/she has been performing in intrastate
[[Page 5427]]
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants
from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a
level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. For this
reason, the Agency is granting the exemptions for the 2-year period
allowed by 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to the 24 applicants listed in
the notice of December 14, 2010 (75 FR 77942).
We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect
his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a
condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements
on the 24 individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions
applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver
program.
Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the
following: (1) That each individual be physically examined every year
(a) by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in
the better eye continues to meet the standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each
individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's
report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical
examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's
qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification
file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must also have a copy of
the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement official.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this proceeding. The comment was
considered and discussed below.
The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation stated that it was in
favor of granting a Federal vision exemption to Bobby Sawyers.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 24 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts, Gary S. Alvarez, Wayne D. Bost, James M. Brasher, Marcus L.
Conner, Joseph L. Dahlman, Brett K. Hasty, Fredrick A. Irby, Matthew B.
Lairamore, Garry D. Layton, Boynton L. Manuel, Anthony W. Miller,
Wesley G. Moore, Rocky Moorhead, Gary J. Peterson, Bernard J. Phillips,
Michael J. Roberts, Alvaro F. Rodriguez, Bobby W. Sawyers, Lynn R.
Schraeder, John R. Shaver, Myron A. Smith, Ricky L. Watts, Cameron R.
Whitford, and Olen L. Williams, Jr. from the vision requirement in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR
391.64(b)).
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption
will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the
terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted
in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the
goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in
effect at that time.
Issued on: January 26, 2011.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-2091 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P