Loan Servicing; Farm Loan Programs, 5055-5058 [2011-1917]
Download as PDF
5055
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 19
Friday, January 28, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
7 CFR Parts 761 and 766
RIN 0560–AI05
Loan Servicing; Farm Loan Programs
Farm Service Agency, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Farm Service Agency
(FSA) is amending the Farm Loan
Programs (FLP) direct loan servicing
regulations to implement provisions of
the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act
of 2008 (the 2008 Farm Bill). This rule
implements four amendments to the
direct loan servicing regulations. The
first amendment further emphasizes
transitioning borrowers to private
sources of credit in the shortest time
practicable. The second amendment
amends the Homestead Protection lease
regulations by extending the right to
purchase the leased property to the
lessee’s immediate family when the
lessee is a member of a socially
disadvantaged group. The third
amendment amends the account
liquidation regulations to suspend
certain loan acceleration and foreclosure
actions, including suspending interest
accrual and offsets, if a borrower has
filed a claim of program discrimination
that has been accepted as valid by
USDA and the borrower’s account is at
the point of acceleration or foreclosure.
The fourth amendment amends the
supervised bank account regulations to
make the FSA regulations on insurable
account limits consistent with the
regulations of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation.
DATES: This rule is effective on February
28, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael C. Cumpton, Assistant to the
Director, Loan Servicing and Property
Management Division, FSA, USDA;
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:31 Jan 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
telephone: (202) 690–4014. Persons with
disabilities who require alternative
means for communications (Braille,
large print, audio tape, etc.) should
contact the USDA Target Center at (202)
720–2600 (voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This final rule implements multiple
provisions of the 2008 Farm Bill (Pub.
L. 110–246) concerning loan servicing
for FSA’s direct loan program. In
general, FSA direct loans provide credit
to farmers who are unable to get credit
elsewhere.
On August 7, 2009, FSA published
the loan servicing proposed rule (74 FR
39565–39569). As discussed below, FSA
proposed three substantive amendments
and one conforming technical
amendment in the proposed rule. This
final rule addresses the comments
received on the proposed rule and
makes some minor revisions to the
proposed language to address the
comments received. FSA received
comments on the proposed rule from
two commenters; the comments
addressed multiple provisions of the
rule. The commenters were a nonprofit
organization and an FSA employee.
Summary of Amendments to the Loan
Servicing Regulations
The amendments in this rule are
made to 7 CFR part 761, ‘‘General
Program Administration,’’ which
specifies provisions that apply to
multiple Farm Loan Programs, and to
7 CFR part 766, ‘‘Direct Loan
Servicing—Special,’’ which specifies the
requirements and procedures for direct
loan servicing in special circumstances,
primarily those involving financially
distressed borrowers.
One amendment promotes the goal of
transitioning borrowers to private credit.
This rule clarifies and expands the
requirements that borrowers must meet,
including training and planning
activities, to demonstrate that they are
gaining the skills to transition to private
credit. These amendments are made to
7 CFR 761.1, ‘‘Introduction,’’ a general
introductory section to the farm loan
regulations, and to 7 CFR 761.103,
‘‘Farm Assessment,’’ which describes
how FSA assesses a borrower’s farming
operation to determine credit
counseling needs and training needs. As
discussed below, in response to a
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comment on the proposed rule, FSA
added additional clarity and detail to
the requirements.
A second amendment allows family
members of lessees who are members of
a socially disadvantaged group to
purchase properties under Homestead
Protection. This amendment, which is
made to 7 CFR 766.154, ‘‘Homestead
Protection Leases,’’ is specifically
required by the 2008 Farm Bill. The
purpose of the Homestead Protection
program is to allow borrowers who
secured their loan with their principal
residence to continue to occupy that
property through a lease or leasepurchase, after it has come into the
inventory of the Government after
foreclosure or voluntary conveyance.
Before this amendment was made, only
the original lessee on a Homestead
Protection lease-purchase agreement
had the option to purchase the property;
this amendment allows the lessee to
designate a family member the right to
exercise that option.
The third amendment sets a
moratorium on foreclosure and loan
acceleration actions for borrowers with
an accepted program discrimination
claim with the USDA Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
Office of Adjudication. This amendment
will stop foreclosure and loan
acceleration actions for borrowers with
an accepted discrimination claim,
including interest accruals and offsets,
while the discrimination claim is being
resolved. This amendment adds a new
section, 7 CFR 766.358, ‘‘Acceleration
and Foreclosure Moratorium’’ to 7 CFR
part 766 subpart H, ‘‘Loan Liquidation.’’
In addition to the amendments
required by the 2008 Farm Bill, this rule
implements a conforming amendment to
comply with section 335(a) of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Pub. L. 111–203, July 21,
2010), which increased the maximum
deposit insurance amount for accounts
insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This rule
changes a reference to the limit on
insured accounts from $100,000 to ‘‘the
maximum amount insurable by the
Federal government,’’ which means that
the FLP regulations will remain
consistent with federal deposit
insurance regulations, even if the FDIC
limit is revised again or authority for
deposit insurance is transferred to
another Federal government entity. The
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
5056
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
current FDIC limit is $250,000. This
amendment is made to 7 CFR 761.51,
‘‘Establishing a Supervised Bank
Account.’’
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Discussion of Comments
The following provides a summary of
the comments related to each
amendment, and FSA’s response,
including changes we are making to the
regulations in response to the
comments.
Transitioning Borrowers to Private
Credit
Comment: ‘‘Borrower graduation
requirements’’ should be added to the
tools noted in 7 CFR 761.1 to assist
borrowers in the transition to private
credit. Also, the new sentence clarifying
the purpose of FSA farm loan programs
should be moved up a sentence.
Response: FSA agrees and has made
the suggested changes.
Comment: ‘‘Graduation plan’’ should
be added to the list of items required as
part of the farm assessment in 7 CFR
761.103(b).
Response: FSA agrees with the
comment and has made the suggested
change. This change supports the
concept of transitioning borrowers to
private commercial credit in the shortest
period possible and reinforces the
importance of the graduation plan. We
also added a reference to Conservation
Loans (CL), to clarify which
requirements do not apply to those
loans. Conservation Loans are a new
type of farm loan, authorized by the
2008 Farm Bill, which may be used to
implement certain conservation
practices. An inability to obtain
commercial credit is not a requirement
for CL eligibility, so some of the
requirements that are intended to help
borrowers transition to commercial
credit do not apply to CL.
Comment: ‘‘Sufficient experience and
training for a successful transition to
private commercial credit’’ should be
made part of the training waiver
requirements in 7 CFR 764.453.
Response: The proposed rule did not
propose changes to 7 CFR 764.453. The
suggested change is not consistent with
the overall objectives of the direct loan
program, which include assisting
borrowers in obtaining training and
experience needed to qualify for
commercial credit. The direct loan
program requires that borrowers who
need additional training must complete
that training during the term of their
direct loan, not as a condition to
initially qualify for a loan. A loan
applicant who already had the
experience and training sufficient to
make a successful transition to private
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:31 Jan 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
credit would likely not need and would
therefore not be eligible for a direct
loan. Therefore, FSA is not amending
the regulations in response to this
comment.
Comment: FSA should reference the
statutory requirement for performance
criteria and publish those criteria.
Response: The existing statutory
requirements for performance criteria
are referenced in the preamble to the
proposed rule. Specifically, Section
5304 of the 2008 Farm Bill amends the
Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1981–2008r,
the Con Act) to add a section that
requires the Secretary to establish a plan
and performance criteria that promote
the goal of transitioning borrowers to
private commercial credit and other
sources of credit in the shortest time
possible. As discussed in the preamble
to the proposed rule, FSA does not
intend to publish additional detail about
the performance criteria in the
regulations. Regulations set
requirements and benefits for the
public; these performance criteria are
the internal procedures that FSA will
use to evaluate its own performance in
transitioning borrowers to private credit.
Extension of Right To Reacquire
Homestead Property to Family
Members
Comment: Why is this opportunity
only provided for lessees who are a
member of a socially disadvantaged
group, rather than all lessees? If it’s a
good idea for one, it’s a good idea for all.
Response: FSA cannot extend this
opportunity to all lessees because
Section 5305 of the 2008 Farm Bill does
not provide authority for us to do so.
FSA is merely implementing the
statutory language approved by
Congress.
Out of Scope Comment
Comment: Oppose FSA’s ‘‘term limits’’
on loans and the applicable provisions
should have been removed in the 2008
Farm Bill. Term limits are arbitrary.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rule. FSA did not
propose changing the term limits in the
proposed rule.
Miscellaneous Changes
This rule makes minor clarifying
changes, which are not in response to a
comment on the provisions in the
proposed rule, to make terms consistent
throughout the rule. For example, this
rule consistently uses the term ‘‘lessee or
designee’’ to refer to a lessee utilizing a
lease-purchase option, rather than
sometimes using that term and
sometimes using the term ‘‘purchaser.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule also adds references to
Conservation Loans where appropriate,
to clarify which provisions do not apply
to those loans.
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) designated this rule as not
significant under Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, OMB has not reviewed
this final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to the notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) or any other statute, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
FSA has determined that this rule will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reasons explained below. Thus, FSA
has not prepared a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
All FSA direct loan borrowers and all
farm entities affected by this rule are
small businesses according to U.S.
Small Business Administration small
business size standards. There is no
diversity in size of the entities affected
by this rule, and the costs to comply
with it are the same for all sizes of
entities. The costs of compliance with
this rule are expected to be minimal.
The foreclosure and loan acceleration
moratorium will reduce interest costs
for some borrowers, and should in no
case increase costs for borrowers. No
comments were received on the
proposed rule regarding disparate
impact on small entities. Therefore, FSA
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Review
The environmental impacts of this
rule have been considered in a manner
consistent with the provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4347), the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and FSA regulations for
compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part
799). The changes to the FLP direct loan
servicing program, required by the 2008
Farm Bill, that are identified in this
final rule are administrative in nature
and can be considered nondiscretionary. Therefore, FSA has
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
determined that NEPA does not apply to
this rule, and no environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement will be prepared.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ requires consultation with
State and local officials. The objectives
of the Executive Order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened Federalism, by relying on
State and local processes for State and
local government coordination and
review of proposed Federal Financial
assistance and direct Federal
development. For reasons set forth in
the Notice to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart
V (48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983), the
programs and activities within this rule
are excluded from the scope of
Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform.’’ The provisions of
this rule will not have preemptive effect
with respect to any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies that conflict
with such provision or which otherwise
impede their full implementation. The
rule will not have retroactive effect.
Before any judicial action may be
brought regarding this rule, all
administrative remedies in accordance
with 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism.’’
The policies contained in this rule do
not have any substantial direct effect on
States, the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor does this final
rule impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, consultation
with the States is not required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for
compliance with Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments.’’ This
Executive Order imposes requirements
on the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. The policies
contained in this rule do not preempt
Tribal law. This rule was included in
the October through December 2010,
Joint Regional Consultation Strategy
facilitated by USDA that consolidated
consultation efforts of 70 rules from the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:31 Jan 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
2008 Farm Bill. USDA sent senior level
agency staff to seven regional locations
and consulted with Tribal leadership in
each region on the rules. When the
consultation process is complete, USDA
will analyze the feedback and then
incorporate any appropriate changes
into the regulations through rulemaking
procedures.
USDA will respond in a timely and
meaningful manner to all Tribal
government requests for consultation
concerning this rule and will provide
additional venues, such as webinars and
teleconferences, to periodically host
collaborative conversations with Tribal
leaders and their representatives
concerning ways to improve this rule in
Indian country.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandate
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104–4) requires Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector.
Agencies generally must prepare a
written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with Federal mandates that may
result in expenditures of $100 million or
more in any 1 year for State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector. UMRA generally
requires agencies to consider
alternatives and adopt the more cost
effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
as defined by Title II of UMRA for State,
local, or tribal governments or for the
private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of UMRA.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal
assistance programs, as found in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance,
to which this rule applies are:
10.099 Conservation Loans
10.404 Emergency Loans
10.406 Farm Operating Loans
10.407 Farm Ownership Loans
Paperwork Reduction Act
The amendments to 7 CFR parts 761
and 766 in this final rule require no new
collection or changes to the current
information collections approved by
OMB under the control numbers 0560–
0233 and 0560–0238.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5057
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 761
Accounting, Loan programs—
Agriculture, Rural areas.
7 CFR Part 766
Agriculture, Agricultural
commodities, Credit, Livestock, Loan
programs—Agriculture.
For the reasons discussed above, this
rule amends 7 CFR chapter VII as
follows:
PART 761—GENERAL PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATION
1. The authority citation for part 761
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart A—General Provisions
2. In § 761.1, amend paragraph (c) by
adding a new third sentence to read as
follows:
■
§ 761.1
Introduction.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * The programs are designed
to allow those who participate to
transition to private commercial credit
or other sources of credit in the shortest
period of time practicable through the
use of supervised credit, including farm
assessments, borrower training, market
placement, and borrower graduation
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—Supervised Bank
Accounts
3. In § 761.51, revise paragraph (e),
introductory text, to read as follows:
■
§ 761.51 Establishing a supervised bank
account.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) If the funds to be deposited into
the account cause the balance to exceed
the maximum amount insurable by the
Federal Government, the financial
institution must agree to pledge
acceptable collateral with the Federal
Reserve Bank for the excess over the
insured amount, before the deposit is
made.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—Supervised Credit
4. In § 761.103, revise paragraphs (a),
(b)(9), and (b)(10), and add paragraph
(b)(11) to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
5058
§ 761.103
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Farm assessment.
(a) The Agency, in collaboration with
the applicant, will assess the farming
operation to:
(1) Determine the applicant’s financial
condition, organizational structure, and
management strengths and weaknesses;
(2) Identify and prioritize training and
supervisory needs; and
(3) Develop a plan of supervision to
assist the borrower in achieving
financial viability and transitioning to
private commercial credit or other
sources of credit in the shortest time
practicable, except for CL.
(b) * * *
(9) Supervisory plan, except for
streamlined CL;
(10) Training plan; and
(11) Graduation plan, except for CL.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 766—DIRECT LOAN
SERVICING—SPECIAL
5. The authority citation for part 766
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart D—Homestead Protection
Program
6. In § 766.154, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 766.154
Homestead Protection Leases.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Lease-purchase options. (1) The
lessee may exercise in writing the
purchase option and complete the
homestead protection purchase at any
time prior to the expiration of the lease
provided all lease payments are current.
(2) If the lessee is a member of a
socially disadvantaged group, the lessee
may designate a member of the lessee’s
immediate family (that is, parent,
sibling, or child) (designee) as having
the right to exercise the option to
purchase.
(3) The purchase price is the market
value of the property when the option
is exercised as determined by a current
appraisal obtained by the Agency.
(4) The lessee or designee may
purchase homestead protection property
with cash or other credit source.
(5) The lessee or designee may receive
Agency program or non-program
financing provided:
(i) The lessee or designee has not
received previous debt forgiveness;
(ii) The Agency has funds available to
finance the purchase of homestead
protection property;
(iii) The lessee or designee
demonstrates an ability to repay such an
FLP loan; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:31 Jan 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
(iv) The lessee or designee is
otherwise eligible for the FLP loan.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart H—Loan Liquidation
■
7. Add § 766.358 to read as follows:
§ 766.358 Acceleration and foreclosure
moratorium.
(a) Notwithstanding any other
provisions of this subpart, borrowers
who file or have filed a program
discrimination complaint that is
accepted by USDA Office of
Adjudication or successor office
(USDA), and have been serviced to the
point of acceleration or foreclosure on
or after May 22, 2008, will not have
their account accelerated or liquidated
until such complaint has been resolved
by USDA or closed by a court of
competent jurisdiction. This
moratorium applies only to program
loans made under subtitle A, B, or C of
the Act (for example, CL, FO, OL, EM,
SW, or RL). Interest will not accrue and
no offsets will be taken on these loans
during the moratorium. Interest accrual
and offsets will continue on all other
loans, including, but not limited to,
non-program loans.
(1) If the Agency prevails on the
program discrimination complaint, the
interest that would have accrued during
the moratorium will be reinstated on the
account when the moratorium
terminates, and all offsets and servicing
actions will resume.
(2) If the borrower prevails on the
program discrimination complaint, the
interest that would have accrued during
the moratorium will not be reinstated on
the account unless specifically required
by the settlement agreement or court
order.
(b) The moratorium will begin on:
(1) May 22, 2008, if the borrower had
a pending program discrimination claim
that was accepted by USDA as valid and
the account was at the point of
acceleration or foreclosure on or before
that date; or
(2) The date after May 22, 2008, when
the borrower has a program
discrimination claim accepted by USDA
as valid and the borrower’s account is
at the point of acceleration or
foreclosure.
(c) The point of acceleration under
this section is the earliest of the
following:
(1) The day after all rights offered on
the Agency notice of intent to accelerate
expire if the borrower does not appeal;
(2) The day after all appeals resulting
from an Agency notice of intent to
accelerate are concluded if the borrower
appeals and the Agency prevails on the
appeal;
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3) The day after all appeal rights have
been concluded relating to a failure to
graduate and the Agency prevails on
any appeal;
(4) Any other time when, because of
litigation, third party action, or other
unforeseen circumstance, acceleration is
the next step for the Agency in servicing
and liquidating the account.
(d) A borrower is considered to be in
foreclosure status under this section
anytime after acceleration of the
account.
(e) The moratorium will end on the
earlier of:
(1) The date the program
discrimination claim is resolved by
USDA or
(2) The date that a court of competent
jurisdiction renders a final decision on
the program discrimination claim if the
borrower appeals the decision of USDA.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 21,
2011.
Jonathan W. Coppess,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011–1917 Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 234
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[CBP Dec 11–05]
RIN 1651–AA86
Airports of Entry or Departure for
Flights to and From Cuba
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Under Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) regulations,
direct flights between the United States
and Cuba must arrive at or depart from
one of three named U.S. airports: John
F. Kennedy International Airport, Los
Angeles International Airport, or Miami
International Airport. This document
amends current DHS regulations to
allow additional U.S. airports that are
able to process international flights to
request approval of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to process
authorized flights between the United
States and Cuba. These amendments are
in accordance with the President’s
recent statement easing the restrictions
placed on flights to and from Cuba by,
among other things, providing that
eligible airports may seek approval from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JAR1.SGM
28JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5055-5058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1917]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 5055]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
7 CFR Parts 761 and 766
RIN 0560-AI05
Loan Servicing; Farm Loan Programs
AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Farm Service Agency (FSA) is amending the Farm Loan
Programs (FLP) direct loan servicing regulations to implement
provisions of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008
Farm Bill). This rule implements four amendments to the direct loan
servicing regulations. The first amendment further emphasizes
transitioning borrowers to private sources of credit in the shortest
time practicable. The second amendment amends the Homestead Protection
lease regulations by extending the right to purchase the leased
property to the lessee's immediate family when the lessee is a member
of a socially disadvantaged group. The third amendment amends the
account liquidation regulations to suspend certain loan acceleration
and foreclosure actions, including suspending interest accrual and
offsets, if a borrower has filed a claim of program discrimination that
has been accepted as valid by USDA and the borrower's account is at the
point of acceleration or foreclosure. The fourth amendment amends the
supervised bank account regulations to make the FSA regulations on
insurable account limits consistent with the regulations of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 28, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael C. Cumpton, Assistant to the
Director, Loan Servicing and Property Management Division, FSA, USDA;
telephone: (202) 690-4014. Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communications (Braille, large print, audio tape,
etc.) should contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This final rule implements multiple provisions of the 2008 Farm
Bill (Pub. L. 110-246) concerning loan servicing for FSA's direct loan
program. In general, FSA direct loans provide credit to farmers who are
unable to get credit elsewhere.
On August 7, 2009, FSA published the loan servicing proposed rule
(74 FR 39565-39569). As discussed below, FSA proposed three substantive
amendments and one conforming technical amendment in the proposed rule.
This final rule addresses the comments received on the proposed rule
and makes some minor revisions to the proposed language to address the
comments received. FSA received comments on the proposed rule from two
commenters; the comments addressed multiple provisions of the rule. The
commenters were a nonprofit organization and an FSA employee.
Summary of Amendments to the Loan Servicing Regulations
The amendments in this rule are made to 7 CFR part 761, ``General
Program Administration,'' which specifies provisions that apply to
multiple Farm Loan Programs, and to 7 CFR part 766, ``Direct Loan
Servicing--Special,'' which specifies the requirements and procedures
for direct loan servicing in special circumstances, primarily those
involving financially distressed borrowers.
One amendment promotes the goal of transitioning borrowers to
private credit. This rule clarifies and expands the requirements that
borrowers must meet, including training and planning activities, to
demonstrate that they are gaining the skills to transition to private
credit. These amendments are made to 7 CFR 761.1, ``Introduction,'' a
general introductory section to the farm loan regulations, and to 7 CFR
761.103, ``Farm Assessment,'' which describes how FSA assesses a
borrower's farming operation to determine credit counseling needs and
training needs. As discussed below, in response to a comment on the
proposed rule, FSA added additional clarity and detail to the
requirements.
A second amendment allows family members of lessees who are members
of a socially disadvantaged group to purchase properties under
Homestead Protection. This amendment, which is made to 7 CFR 766.154,
``Homestead Protection Leases,'' is specifically required by the 2008
Farm Bill. The purpose of the Homestead Protection program is to allow
borrowers who secured their loan with their principal residence to
continue to occupy that property through a lease or lease-purchase,
after it has come into the inventory of the Government after
foreclosure or voluntary conveyance. Before this amendment was made,
only the original lessee on a Homestead Protection lease-purchase
agreement had the option to purchase the property; this amendment
allows the lessee to designate a family member the right to exercise
that option.
The third amendment sets a moratorium on foreclosure and loan
acceleration actions for borrowers with an accepted program
discrimination claim with the USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication. This amendment will stop
foreclosure and loan acceleration actions for borrowers with an
accepted discrimination claim, including interest accruals and offsets,
while the discrimination claim is being resolved. This amendment adds a
new section, 7 CFR 766.358, ``Acceleration and Foreclosure Moratorium''
to 7 CFR part 766 subpart H, ``Loan Liquidation.''
In addition to the amendments required by the 2008 Farm Bill, this
rule implements a conforming amendment to comply with section 335(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L.
111-203, July 21, 2010), which increased the maximum deposit insurance
amount for accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC). This rule changes a reference to the limit on
insured accounts from $100,000 to ``the maximum amount insurable by the
Federal government,'' which means that the FLP regulations will remain
consistent with federal deposit insurance regulations, even if the FDIC
limit is revised again or authority for deposit insurance is
transferred to another Federal government entity. The
[[Page 5056]]
current FDIC limit is $250,000. This amendment is made to 7 CFR 761.51,
``Establishing a Supervised Bank Account.''
Discussion of Comments
The following provides a summary of the comments related to each
amendment, and FSA's response, including changes we are making to the
regulations in response to the comments.
Transitioning Borrowers to Private Credit
Comment: ``Borrower graduation requirements'' should be added to
the tools noted in 7 CFR 761.1 to assist borrowers in the transition to
private credit. Also, the new sentence clarifying the purpose of FSA
farm loan programs should be moved up a sentence.
Response: FSA agrees and has made the suggested changes.
Comment: ``Graduation plan'' should be added to the list of items
required as part of the farm assessment in 7 CFR 761.103(b).
Response: FSA agrees with the comment and has made the suggested
change. This change supports the concept of transitioning borrowers to
private commercial credit in the shortest period possible and
reinforces the importance of the graduation plan. We also added a
reference to Conservation Loans (CL), to clarify which requirements do
not apply to those loans. Conservation Loans are a new type of farm
loan, authorized by the 2008 Farm Bill, which may be used to implement
certain conservation practices. An inability to obtain commercial
credit is not a requirement for CL eligibility, so some of the
requirements that are intended to help borrowers transition to
commercial credit do not apply to CL.
Comment: ``Sufficient experience and training for a successful
transition to private commercial credit'' should be made part of the
training waiver requirements in 7 CFR 764.453.
Response: The proposed rule did not propose changes to 7 CFR
764.453. The suggested change is not consistent with the overall
objectives of the direct loan program, which include assisting
borrowers in obtaining training and experience needed to qualify for
commercial credit. The direct loan program requires that borrowers who
need additional training must complete that training during the term of
their direct loan, not as a condition to initially qualify for a loan.
A loan applicant who already had the experience and training sufficient
to make a successful transition to private credit would likely not need
and would therefore not be eligible for a direct loan. Therefore, FSA
is not amending the regulations in response to this comment.
Comment: FSA should reference the statutory requirement for
performance criteria and publish those criteria.
Response: The existing statutory requirements for performance
criteria are referenced in the preamble to the proposed rule.
Specifically, Section 5304 of the 2008 Farm Bill amends the
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1981-2008r, the
Con Act) to add a section that requires the Secretary to establish a
plan and performance criteria that promote the goal of transitioning
borrowers to private commercial credit and other sources of credit in
the shortest time possible. As discussed in the preamble to the
proposed rule, FSA does not intend to publish additional detail about
the performance criteria in the regulations. Regulations set
requirements and benefits for the public; these performance criteria
are the internal procedures that FSA will use to evaluate its own
performance in transitioning borrowers to private credit.
Extension of Right To Reacquire Homestead Property to Family Members
Comment: Why is this opportunity only provided for lessees who are
a member of a socially disadvantaged group, rather than all lessees? If
it's a good idea for one, it's a good idea for all.
Response: FSA cannot extend this opportunity to all lessees because
Section 5305 of the 2008 Farm Bill does not provide authority for us to
do so. FSA is merely implementing the statutory language approved by
Congress.
Out of Scope Comment
Comment: Oppose FSA's ``term limits'' on loans and the applicable
provisions should have been removed in the 2008 Farm Bill. Term limits
are arbitrary.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rule. FSA did
not propose changing the term limits in the proposed rule.
Miscellaneous Changes
This rule makes minor clarifying changes, which are not in response
to a comment on the provisions in the proposed rule, to make terms
consistent throughout the rule. For example, this rule consistently
uses the term ``lessee or designee'' to refer to a lessee utilizing a
lease-purchase option, rather than sometimes using that term and
sometimes using the term ``purchaser.'' This rule also adds references
to Conservation Loans where appropriate, to clarify which provisions do
not apply to those loans.
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as
not significant under Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, OMB has not
reviewed this final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA), generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to the notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 553) or any other statute, unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. FSA has determined that this rule will not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities for
the reasons explained below. Thus, FSA has not prepared a regulatory
flexibility analysis.
All FSA direct loan borrowers and all farm entities affected by
this rule are small businesses according to U.S. Small Business
Administration small business size standards. There is no diversity in
size of the entities affected by this rule, and the costs to comply
with it are the same for all sizes of entities. The costs of compliance
with this rule are expected to be minimal. The foreclosure and loan
acceleration moratorium will reduce interest costs for some borrowers,
and should in no case increase costs for borrowers. No comments were
received on the proposed rule regarding disparate impact on small
entities. Therefore, FSA certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Review
The environmental impacts of this rule have been considered in a
manner consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), the regulations of the Council
on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and FSA regulations
for compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part 799). The changes to the FLP
direct loan servicing program, required by the 2008 Farm Bill, that are
identified in this final rule are administrative in nature and can be
considered non-discretionary. Therefore, FSA has
[[Page 5057]]
determined that NEPA does not apply to this rule, and no environmental
assessment or environmental impact statement will be prepared.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,'' requires consultation with State and local officials. The
objectives of the Executive Order are to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened Federalism, by relying on State and
local processes for State and local government coordination and review
of proposed Federal Financial assistance and direct Federal
development. For reasons set forth in the Notice to 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V (48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983), the programs and activities
within this rule are excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988, ``Civil Justice Reform.'' The provisions of this rule will not
have preemptive effect with respect to any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies that conflict with such provision or which
otherwise impede their full implementation. The rule will not have
retroactive effect. Before any judicial action may be brought regarding
this rule, all administrative remedies in accordance with 7 CFR part 11
must be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132,
``Federalism.'' The policies contained in this rule do not have any
substantial direct effect on States, the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
final rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and
local governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not
required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for compliance with Executive Order
13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.'' This Executive Order imposes requirements on the
development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. The policies contained in this rule do not preempt
Tribal law. This rule was included in the October through December
2010, Joint Regional Consultation Strategy facilitated by USDA that
consolidated consultation efforts of 70 rules from the 2008 Farm Bill.
USDA sent senior level agency staff to seven regional locations and
consulted with Tribal leadership in each region on the rules. When the
consultation process is complete, USDA will analyze the feedback and
then incorporate any appropriate changes into the regulations through
rulemaking procedures.
USDA will respond in a timely and meaningful manner to all Tribal
government requests for consultation concerning this rule and will
provide additional venues, such as webinars and teleconferences, to
periodically host collaborative conversations with Tribal leaders and
their representatives concerning ways to improve this rule in Indian
country.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104-4) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. Agencies generally must prepare a written statement,
including a cost benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with
Federal mandates that may result in expenditures of $100 million or
more in any 1 year for State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. UMRA generally requires agencies
to consider alternatives and adopt the more cost effective or least
burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This
rule contains no Federal mandates as defined by Title II of UMRA for
State, local, or tribal governments or for the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202
and 205 of UMRA.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal assistance programs, as found
in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, to which this rule
applies are:
10.099 Conservation Loans
10.404 Emergency Loans
10.406 Farm Operating Loans
10.407 Farm Ownership Loans
Paperwork Reduction Act
The amendments to 7 CFR parts 761 and 766 in this final rule
require no new collection or changes to the current information
collections approved by OMB under the control numbers 0560-0233 and
0560-0238.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 761
Accounting, Loan programs--Agriculture, Rural areas.
7 CFR Part 766
Agriculture, Agricultural commodities, Credit, Livestock, Loan
programs--Agriculture.
For the reasons discussed above, this rule amends 7 CFR chapter VII
as follows:
PART 761--GENERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 761 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. In Sec. 761.1, amend paragraph (c) by adding a new third sentence
to read as follows:
Sec. 761.1 Introduction.
* * * * *
(c) * * * The programs are designed to allow those who participate
to transition to private commercial credit or other sources of credit
in the shortest period of time practicable through the use of
supervised credit, including farm assessments, borrower training,
market placement, and borrower graduation requirements.
* * * * *
Subpart B--Supervised Bank Accounts
0
3. In Sec. 761.51, revise paragraph (e), introductory text, to read as
follows:
Sec. 761.51 Establishing a supervised bank account.
* * * * *
(e) If the funds to be deposited into the account cause the balance
to exceed the maximum amount insurable by the Federal Government, the
financial institution must agree to pledge acceptable collateral with
the Federal Reserve Bank for the excess over the insured amount, before
the deposit is made.
* * * * *
Subpart C--Supervised Credit
0
4. In Sec. 761.103, revise paragraphs (a), (b)(9), and (b)(10), and
add paragraph (b)(11) to read as follows:
[[Page 5058]]
Sec. 761.103 Farm assessment.
(a) The Agency, in collaboration with the applicant, will assess
the farming operation to:
(1) Determine the applicant's financial condition, organizational
structure, and management strengths and weaknesses;
(2) Identify and prioritize training and supervisory needs; and
(3) Develop a plan of supervision to assist the borrower in
achieving financial viability and transitioning to private commercial
credit or other sources of credit in the shortest time practicable,
except for CL.
(b) * * *
(9) Supervisory plan, except for streamlined CL;
(10) Training plan; and
(11) Graduation plan, except for CL.
* * * * *
PART 766--DIRECT LOAN SERVICING--SPECIAL
0
5. The authority citation for part 766 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart D--Homestead Protection Program
0
6. In Sec. 766.154, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 766.154 Homestead Protection Leases.
* * * * *
(c) Lease-purchase options. (1) The lessee may exercise in writing
the purchase option and complete the homestead protection purchase at
any time prior to the expiration of the lease provided all lease
payments are current.
(2) If the lessee is a member of a socially disadvantaged group,
the lessee may designate a member of the lessee's immediate family
(that is, parent, sibling, or child) (designee) as having the right to
exercise the option to purchase.
(3) The purchase price is the market value of the property when the
option is exercised as determined by a current appraisal obtained by
the Agency.
(4) The lessee or designee may purchase homestead protection
property with cash or other credit source.
(5) The lessee or designee may receive Agency program or non-
program financing provided:
(i) The lessee or designee has not received previous debt
forgiveness;
(ii) The Agency has funds available to finance the purchase of
homestead protection property;
(iii) The lessee or designee demonstrates an ability to repay such
an FLP loan; and
(iv) The lessee or designee is otherwise eligible for the FLP loan.
* * * * *
Subpart H--Loan Liquidation
0
7. Add Sec. 766.358 to read as follows:
Sec. 766.358 Acceleration and foreclosure moratorium.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this subpart, borrowers
who file or have filed a program discrimination complaint that is
accepted by USDA Office of Adjudication or successor office (USDA), and
have been serviced to the point of acceleration or foreclosure on or
after May 22, 2008, will not have their account accelerated or
liquidated until such complaint has been resolved by USDA or closed by
a court of competent jurisdiction. This moratorium applies only to
program loans made under subtitle A, B, or C of the Act (for example,
CL, FO, OL, EM, SW, or RL). Interest will not accrue and no offsets
will be taken on these loans during the moratorium. Interest accrual
and offsets will continue on all other loans, including, but not
limited to, non-program loans.
(1) If the Agency prevails on the program discrimination complaint,
the interest that would have accrued during the moratorium will be
reinstated on the account when the moratorium terminates, and all
offsets and servicing actions will resume.
(2) If the borrower prevails on the program discrimination
complaint, the interest that would have accrued during the moratorium
will not be reinstated on the account unless specifically required by
the settlement agreement or court order.
(b) The moratorium will begin on:
(1) May 22, 2008, if the borrower had a pending program
discrimination claim that was accepted by USDA as valid and the account
was at the point of acceleration or foreclosure on or before that date;
or
(2) The date after May 22, 2008, when the borrower has a program
discrimination claim accepted by USDA as valid and the borrower's
account is at the point of acceleration or foreclosure.
(c) The point of acceleration under this section is the earliest of
the following:
(1) The day after all rights offered on the Agency notice of intent
to accelerate expire if the borrower does not appeal;
(2) The day after all appeals resulting from an Agency notice of
intent to accelerate are concluded if the borrower appeals and the
Agency prevails on the appeal;
(3) The day after all appeal rights have been concluded relating to
a failure to graduate and the Agency prevails on any appeal;
(4) Any other time when, because of litigation, third party action,
or other unforeseen circumstance, acceleration is the next step for the
Agency in servicing and liquidating the account.
(d) A borrower is considered to be in foreclosure status under this
section anytime after acceleration of the account.
(e) The moratorium will end on the earlier of:
(1) The date the program discrimination claim is resolved by USDA
or
(2) The date that a court of competent jurisdiction renders a final
decision on the program discrimination claim if the borrower appeals
the decision of USDA.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 21, 2011.
Jonathan W. Coppess,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-1917 Filed 1-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P