Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; U.S. Navy Training in the Southern California Range Complex, 4870-4873 [2011-1847]
Download as PDF
4870
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 18 / Thursday, January 27, 2011 / Notices
implementing regulations, and the
associated FEIS. NMFS will consider all
public comments received during the
Secretarial review period, whether they
are on the final amendments, the
proposed regulations, or the FEIS, prior
to final agency action.
Scoping Meeting Dates, Times, and
Locations
All scoping meetings are scheduled to
be held from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. The
meetings will be physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Request for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to the
Council (see ADDRESSES).
February 7, 2011, DoubleTree by
Hilton San Juan, DeDiego Avenue, San
Juan, Puerto Rico.
¨
February 9, 2011, Mayaguez Holiday
¨
Inn, 2701 Hostos Avenue, Mayaguez,
Puerto Rico.
February 10, 2011, Holiday Inn Ponce
& Tropical Casino, 3315 Ponce ByPass,
Ponce, Puerto Rico.
February 16, 2011, The Buccaneer
Hotel, Estate Shoys, Christiansted, St.
Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands.
February 17, 2011, Holiday Inn
(Windward Passage Hotel), Charlotte
Amalie, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: January 21, 2011.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–1842 Filed 1–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA181
New England Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) is
scheduling a peer review of work
completed by its Habitat Plan
Development Team on February 15–17,
2011. The review panel is being
convened for the purpose of providing
expert technical comments and advice
on the use of the Swept Area Seabed
Impact model in Council fishery
management plans. The model is a georeferenced analytical tool that is
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:51 Jan 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
intended to estimate the adverse effects
(Z) of fishing on seabed structures by
combining fishing effort data, seabed
substrate and energy data and gear
specific habitat vulnerability
parameters. This tool will enable a
better understanding of fishing gear
impacts on benthic habitats, the spatial
distribution of benthic habitat
vulnerability to particular fishing gears,
and the distribution of adverse effects
from fishing activities on benthic
habitats. Recommendations from this
group will be brought to the full Council
for formal consideration.
This meeting will be held on
Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday,
February 15–17, beginning at 10 a.m. on
the first day and 8:30 a.m. on the
subsequent days.
DATES:
The meeting will be held at
the Hotel Providence, 130 Mathewson
Street, Providence, RI 02903; telephone:
(800) 861–8990; fax: (401) 861–8002.
Council address: New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul
J. Howard, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council;
telephone: (978) 465–0492.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tuesday, February 15–17, 2011
Led by a member of the Council’s
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC), the three to four member panel
will determine if the Swept Area Seabed
Impact model approach is a reasonable
way to estimate the magnitude and
location of adverse effects of fishing on
essential fish habitat (EFH); also, if the
approach, including the geo-statistical
and practicability analyses, are a
reasonable way to develop and analyze
spatially-based management alternatives
to minimize the adverse effects of
fishing on EFH; and finally, whether
existing gaps in data and theoretical
understanding of habitat-related
processes have been identified during
model development.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically
listed in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, provided the public has been
notified of the Council’s intent to take
final action to address the emergency.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Paul
J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978)
465–0492, at least 5 days prior to the
meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: January 24, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–1763 Filed 1–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–AW91
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; U.S. Navy Training in the
Southern California Range Complex
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of a Letter of
Authorization; request for comments on
Integrated Comprehensive Management
Program Plan.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), as amended, and
implementing regulations, notice is
hereby given that NMFS has issued a
Letter of Authorization (LOA) to the
U.S. Navy (Navy) to take marine
mammals incidental to Navy training,
maintenance, and research,
development, testing, and evaluation
(RDT&E) activities to be conducted
within the Southern California (SOCAL)
Range Complex, which extends south
and southwest off the southern
California coast, for the period of
January 22, 2011, through January 21,
2012.
NMFS also provides notice that the
Integrated Comprehensive Management
Program (ICMP) Plan, which is intended
for use as a planning tool to focus Navy
monitoring priorities pursuant to the
MMPA and Endangered Species Act
(ESA), has been updated for 2011.
NMFS encourages the public to review
this document and provide comments,
information, and suggestions on the
ICMP Plan.
DATES: This Authorization is effective
from January 22, 2011, through January
21, 2012. Comments and information on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 18 / Thursday, January 27, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
the ICMP Plan must be received no later
than February 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The LOA and supporting
documentation may be obtained by
writing to P. Michael Payne, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, or by telephoning one of the
contacts listed here. The mailbox
address for providing email comments
on the ICMP Plan is
ITP.Hopper@noaa.gov. Comments sent
via e-mail, including all attachments,
must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Magliocca, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, 301–713–2289, ext.
123.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.) directs NMFS to allow,
upon request, the incidental taking of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing), if certain findings
are made by NMFS and regulations are
issued. Under the MMPA, the term
‘‘take’’ means to harass, hunt, capture, or
kill or to attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill marine mammals.
Regulations governing the taking of
marine mammals by the Navy incidental
to training, maintenance, and RDT&E in
the SOCAL Range Complex became
effective on January 14, 2009 (74 FR
3881, January 21, 2009), and remain in
effect through January 14, 2014. For
detailed information on this action,
please refer to that document. These
regulations include mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
and establish a framework to authorize
incidental take through the issuance of
LOAs.
Summary of Request
On August 1, 2010, NMFS received a
request from the Navy for a renewal of
an LOA issued on January 22, 2010, for
the taking of marine mammals
incidental to training and research
activities conducted within the SOCAL
Range Complex under regulations
issued on January 14, 2009 (74 FR 3881,
January 21, 2009). The Navy has
complied with the measures required in
50 CFR 216.274 and 216.275, as well as
the associated 2010 LOA, and submitted
the reports and other documentation
required in the final rule and the 2010
LOA.
Summary of Activity Under the 2010
LOA
As described in the Navy’s exercise
reports (both classified and
unclassified), in 2010, the training
activities conducted by the Navy were
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:51 Jan 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
within the scope and amounts
authorized by the 2010 LOA and the
levels of take remain within the scope
and amounts contemplated by the final
rule.
Planned Activities and Estimated Take
for 2011
In 2011, the Navy expects to conduct
the same type and amount of training
identified in the 2010 LOA. Similarly,
the authorized take will remain within
the annual estimates analyzed in the
final rule.
Summary of Monitoring, Reporting,
and Other Requirements Under the
2010 LOA Annual Exercise Reports
The Navy submitted their classified
and unclassified 2010 exercise reports
within the required timeframes and the
unclassified report is posted on NMFS
Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. NMFS has
reviewed both reports and they contain
the information required by the 2010
LOA. The reports indicate the amounts
of different types of training that
occurred from August 2, 2009, through
August 1, 2010. The Navy conducted
five Major Training Exercises (MTEs)—
one Sustainment Exercise (SUSTEX),
two Integrated Anti-Submarine Warfare
Courses (IAC II), and two Composite
Training Exercises (C2X) (the rule
authorizes eight per year)—for a total of
40 days.
The reports also list specific
information gathered when marine
mammals were detected by Navy
watchstanders, such as how far an
animal was from the vessel, whether
sonar was in use, and whether it was
powered or shut down. This
information indicates that the Navy
implemented the safety zone mitigation
measures as required. No instances of
obvious behavioral disturbance were
reported by the Navy watchstanders in
their 210 marine mammal sightings
totaling 1,217 animals.
2010 Monitoring
The Navy conducted the monitoring
required by the 2010 LOA and described
in the Monitoring Plan, which included
aerial and vessel surveys of sonar and
exercises by dedicated MMOs, passive
acoustic monitoring utilizing highfrequency acoustic recording packages
(HARPs), and marine mammal tagging
and tracking. The Navy submitted their
2010 Monitoring Report, which is
posted on NMFS’ Web site (https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm), within the required
timeframe. The Navy included a
summary of their 2010 monitoring effort
and results (beginning on page 182 of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4871
the monitoring report) and the specific
reports for each individual effort are
presented in the appendices. Because
data is gathered through August 1 and
the report is due in October, some of the
data analysis will occur in the
subsequent year’s report. Navy-funded
marine mammal monitoring
accomplishments within SOCAL for the
past year include the following:
Visual Surveys
The Navy completed a total of 1,061
hours of visual surveys during or after
training events. During this time, there
were 331 sightings of approximately
29,269 marine mammals and 26.3 hours
of detailed behavioral focal follows were
recorded. Preliminary results from a
single survey show that the most
frequent initial behavioral state
observed for common dolphins and fin
whales was traveling. While fin whales
were only observed traveling (although
sometimes at different speeds), common
dolphins were also observed logging,
milling, and resting. There was one
interesting observation of a minke whale
breaching at a time when no active
sonar was being used and no Navy
vessels were in the area. The Navy plans
to upload visual data from the aerial
surveys to OBIS–SEAMAP, a spatially
referenced online database, by summer
2011.
Marine Mammal Observations
A total of 144 hours of marine
mammal observer (MMO) effort was
completed during Navy training events.
Of the 210 Navy marine mammal
sightings during MTEs, there were 62
sightings of 306 marine mammals
within 1,000 yards that qualified as
mitigation events. Of the 306
individuals observed, 71 percent were
dolphins, 16 percent were whales, and
12 percent were pinnipeds. Of the 62
mitigation events, sonar was turned off
during 29 periods and turned down
during 27 periods. The remaining six
periods when mitigation did not occur
were explained due to bowriding
dolphins (for which there is an
exception in the shutdown
requirements) or marine mammals
leaving a mitigation zone. In total, the
Navy lost a minimum of 20 hours of
training time due to mitigation events.
There were no reports of marine
mammals behaving in any unusual
manner during these events.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Two Passive Acoustic Monitoring
(PAM) devices were deployed for a total
of 15,335 hours of high-frequency
acoustic recording package (HARP)
recordings before, during, and after
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
4872
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 18 / Thursday, January 27, 2011 / Notices
Navy training exercises. The devices
detected at least 11 different marine
mammal species during the monitoring
period. Recordings from the delphinid
species have been incorporated into a
larger database of cetacean acoustic data
and there are several current projects
assessing clicks and/or whistles for
species- and population-specific call
structures.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Tagging
A total of 19 satellite tags were
deployed on five different species of
marine mammals. Highlights from the
tagging results show long-term
movement of Cuvier’s beaked whales,
one of the first indications that Southern
California beaked whales may engage in
non-local, out of area movement.
Movements of a fin whale over a 160day period have also been recorded.
In conclusion, the Navy’s
implementation of the monitoring plan
accomplished several goals, primarily
through contributions to larger bodies of
data intended to better characterize the
abundance, distribution, life history,
and behaviors of the species in the
SOCAL Range Complex. The monitoring
satisfied the objectives of the monitoring
plan and specifically contributed to a
greater knowledge and understanding
of: The density and distribution of
species within the SOCAL Range
Complex, which will be added to a
growing database of marine mammal
aggregations around the world; the
vocalizations of different species, which
contributes to the development of
automated classification software; the
movement patterns of individuals (both
vertically in the water column on a
daily basis, as well as horizontally over
weeks and months); and the observable
behavioral patterns of marine mammals,
both with and without exposure to Navy
training activities.
Except as described below in the
Adaptive Management section, NMFS
concludes that the results of these
monitoring efforts, when taken together
with the findings presented in the 2010
exercise report (see Annual Exercise
Report section), do not warrant making
changes to the current monitoring and
mitigation requirements identified in
the LOA. While the data collected by
the Navy through monitoring and
reporting builds on the existing body of
information in a valuable way, none of
the new data contradict, or amend, the
assumptions that underlie the findings
in the 2009 rule in a manner that would
suggest that the mitigation or
monitoring should change.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:51 Jan 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
Adaptive Management
NMFS and the Navy conducted an
adaptive management meeting in
October, 2010, which representatives
from the Marine Mammal Commission
participated in, wherein we reviewed
the Navy monitoring results through
August 1, 2010, discussed other Navy
research and development efforts, and
discussed other new information that
could potentially inform decisions
regarding Navy mitigation and
monitoring. Based on the
implementation of the 2010 monitoring,
the Navy proposed some slight
modifications to their monitoring plan
for 2011, which NMFS agreed were
appropriate. Beyond those changes,
none of the information discussed led
NMFS to recommend any modifications
to the existing mitigation or monitoring
measures. The final modifications to the
monitoring plan and justifications are
described in Section 13 of the Navy’s
2011 LOA Application, which may be
viewed at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring
Report
The 2010 LOA required that the Navy
update the ICMP Plan to reflect
development in three areas, specifically:
(1) Identifying more specific monitoring
sub-goals under the major goals that
have been identified; (2) characterizing
Navy Range Complexes and study areas
within the context of the prioritization
guidelines described in the ICMP Plan;
and (3) continuing to develop data
management, organization, and access
procedures. The Navy has updated the
ICMP Plan as required. Because the
ICMP is an evolving Program, we have
posted the ICMP on NMFS Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm and are specifically
requesting input, which the Navy and
NMFS will consider and apply as
appropriate.
Further, the Navy convened a
monitoring meeting in October, 2010 to
solicit input from NMFS and marine
mammal and acoustic scientists
regarding the comprehensive
development and improvement of the
more specific monitoring that should
occur across the Navy’s training areas.
Subsequent to those discussions, the
Navy has developed a scientific
advisory group composed of individuals
from the research community and
academia that will develop a proposed
Strategic Plan for Navy monitoring that
better considers the biological,
logistical, and resource-specific factors
that are applicable in each training area
(and which are summarized in the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
updated ICMP) to maximize the
effectiveness of Navy monitoring within
the context of the information that is
most needed. Subsequently, NMFS and
MMC representatives will review this
proposed Strategic Plan for marine
species monitoring, which may reflect
monitoring differences in some Navy
training areas from what is required in
the 2010 LOA.
This Navy-wide Strategic Monitoring
Plan will then be available for review
and discussion at the required 2011
Navy Monitoring Meeting, which will
take place in mid-2011. The Navy and
NMFS will then modify the Navy-wide
Strategic Plan for monitoring based on
applicable input from the 2011
Monitoring Meeting and propose
appropriate changes to the monitoring
measures in specific LOAs for the
different Range Complexes and training
areas. For training areas with
substantive monitoring modifications,
NMFS will subsequently publish
proposed LOAs, with the modifications,
in the Federal Register and solicit
public input. After addressing public
comments and making changes as
appropriate, NMFS would, as
appropriate, issue new LOAs for the
different training areas that reflect the
updated ICMP and associated new
Strategic Plan for Navy monitoring.
Whale Strikes in 2009
In 2009, a Navy vessel associated with
the activities covered by the 2009
SOCAL Range Complex regulations
collided with and injured or killed two
large whales. Of note, in both cases, the
Navy was in compliance with the
mitigation and monitoring measures
required by the rule and LOA, contacted
NMFS in a timely manner, and provided
the specific information outlined in the
SOCAL Stranding Response Plan for
whale strikes, as well as additional
information. Due to these incidents,
NMFS is working on a proposed
modification to the 2009 SOCAL rule,
which will establish a framework to
authorize the incidental take of large
whales by injury or mortality for the
remainder of the five-year regulatory
period.
Authorization
The Navy complied with the
requirements of the 2010 LOA. Based on
our review of the record, NMFS has
determined that the marine mammal
take resulting from the 2010 military
readiness training and research
activities falls within the levels
previously anticipated, analyzed, and
authorized. Further, the level of taking
authorized in 2011 for the Navy’s
SOCAL Range Complex activities is
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 18 / Thursday, January 27, 2011 / Notices
consistent with our previous findings
made for the total taking allowed under
the SOCAL Range Complex regulations.
Finally, the record supports NMFS’
conclusion that the total number of
marine mammals taken by the 2011
activities in the SOCAL Range Complex
will have no more than a negligible
impact on the affected species or stock
of marine mammals and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of these species or stocks for
taking for subsistence uses.
Accordingly, NMFS has issued a oneyear LOA for Navy training exercises
conducted in the SOCAL Range
Complex from January 22, 2011, through
January 21, 2012.
Dated: January 21, 2011.
Helen M. Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–1847 Filed 1–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO).
Title: Third-Party Submissions and
Protests (formerly Green Technology
Pilot Program).
Form Number(s): None.
Agency Approval Number: 0651–
0062.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 9,350 hours annually.
Number of Respondents: 1,225
responses per year.
Avg. Hours Per Response: The USPTO
estimates that it will take the public
between 7.5 and 10 hours, depending
upon the complexity of the situation, to
gather the necessary information,
prepare the appropriate form or
documents, and submit the information
to the USPTO.
Needs and Uses: This information is
required by 35 U.S.C. 122(c), 131 and
151 and administered by the USPTO
through 37 CFR 1.99 and 1.291. This
information collection is necessary so
that the public may (i) make a
submission in a published application
and (ii) protest a pending application.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:51 Jan 26, 2011
Jkt 223001
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofits; not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser,
e-mail:
Nicholas_A_Fraser@omb.eop.gov.
Once submitted, the request will be
publicly available in electronic format
through the Information Collection
Review page at https://www.reginfo.gov.
Paper copies can be obtained by:
• E-mail:
InformationCollection@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0062 copy request’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan K. Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent on
or before February 28, 2011 to Nicholas
A. Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail
at Nicholas_A_Fraser@omb.eop.gov or
by fax to 202–395–5167, marked to the
attention of Nicholas A. Fraser.
Dated: January 24, 2011.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–1731 Filed 1–26–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Submission for OMB Review
Department of Education.
Comment request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Director, Information
Collection Clearance Division,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before February
28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395–5806 or
e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov with a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4873
cc: to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. The OMB is
particularly interested in comments
which: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: January 24, 2011.
Darrin A. King,
Director, Information Collection Clearance
Division, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education
Type of Review: New.
Title of Collection: Striving Readers
Comprehensive Literacy Discretionary
Grants.
OMB Control Number: Pending.
Agency Form Number(s): N/A.
Frequency of Responses: Once.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Government, State Educational
Agencies or Local Educational Agencies.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 48.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 9,600.
Abstract: The Striving Readers
Comprehensive Literacy program is
authorized as part of the FY 2010
Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub.
L. 111–117) under the Title I
demonstration authority (Part E, Section
1502 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act (ESEA)). The FY 2010
Appropriations Act provides $200
million for a comprehensive literacy
development and education program to
advance literacy skills for students from
birth through grade 12. The Act reserves
eighty-nine percent of the funds
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4870-4873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1847]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-AW91
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; U.S. Navy Training in the
Southern California Range Complex
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of a Letter of Authorization; request for
comments on Integrated Comprehensive Management Program Plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended, and implementing regulations, notice is hereby given that NMFS
has issued a Letter of Authorization (LOA) to the U.S. Navy (Navy) to
take marine mammals incidental to Navy training, maintenance, and
research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) activities to be
conducted within the Southern California (SOCAL) Range Complex, which
extends south and southwest off the southern California coast, for the
period of January 22, 2011, through January 21, 2012.
NMFS also provides notice that the Integrated Comprehensive
Management Program (ICMP) Plan, which is intended for use as a planning
tool to focus Navy monitoring priorities pursuant to the MMPA and
Endangered Species Act (ESA), has been updated for 2011. NMFS
encourages the public to review this document and provide comments,
information, and suggestions on the ICMP Plan.
DATES: This Authorization is effective from January 22, 2011, through
January 21, 2012. Comments and information on
[[Page 4871]]
the ICMP Plan must be received no later than February 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The LOA and supporting documentation may be obtained by
writing to P. Michael Payne, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or by telephoning one of
the contacts listed here. The mailbox address for providing email
comments on the ICMP Plan is ITP.Hopper@noaa.gov. Comments sent via e-
mail, including all attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte file
size.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Magliocca, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 301-713-2289, ext. 123.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.) directs NMFS to allow, upon request, the incidental
taking of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing), if certain findings are made
by NMFS and regulations are issued. Under the MMPA, the term ``take''
means to harass, hunt, capture, or kill or to attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill marine mammals.
Regulations governing the taking of marine mammals by the Navy
incidental to training, maintenance, and RDT&E in the SOCAL Range
Complex became effective on January 14, 2009 (74 FR 3881, January 21,
2009), and remain in effect through January 14, 2014. For detailed
information on this action, please refer to that document. These
regulations include mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements
and establish a framework to authorize incidental take through the
issuance of LOAs.
Summary of Request
On August 1, 2010, NMFS received a request from the Navy for a
renewal of an LOA issued on January 22, 2010, for the taking of marine
mammals incidental to training and research activities conducted within
the SOCAL Range Complex under regulations issued on January 14, 2009
(74 FR 3881, January 21, 2009). The Navy has complied with the measures
required in 50 CFR 216.274 and 216.275, as well as the associated 2010
LOA, and submitted the reports and other documentation required in the
final rule and the 2010 LOA.
Summary of Activity Under the 2010 LOA
As described in the Navy's exercise reports (both classified and
unclassified), in 2010, the training activities conducted by the Navy
were within the scope and amounts authorized by the 2010 LOA and the
levels of take remain within the scope and amounts contemplated by the
final rule.
Planned Activities and Estimated Take for 2011
In 2011, the Navy expects to conduct the same type and amount of
training identified in the 2010 LOA. Similarly, the authorized take
will remain within the annual estimates analyzed in the final rule.
Summary of Monitoring, Reporting, and Other Requirements Under the 2010
LOA Annual Exercise Reports
The Navy submitted their classified and unclassified 2010 exercise
reports within the required timeframes and the unclassified report is
posted on NMFS Web site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm. NMFS has reviewed both reports and they contain the
information required by the 2010 LOA. The reports indicate the amounts
of different types of training that occurred from August 2, 2009,
through August 1, 2010. The Navy conducted five Major Training
Exercises (MTEs)--one Sustainment Exercise (SUSTEX), two Integrated
Anti-Submarine Warfare Courses (IAC II), and two Composite Training
Exercises (C2X) (the rule authorizes eight per year)--for a total of 40
days.
The reports also list specific information gathered when marine
mammals were detected by Navy watchstanders, such as how far an animal
was from the vessel, whether sonar was in use, and whether it was
powered or shut down. This information indicates that the Navy
implemented the safety zone mitigation measures as required. No
instances of obvious behavioral disturbance were reported by the Navy
watchstanders in their 210 marine mammal sightings totaling 1,217
animals.
2010 Monitoring
The Navy conducted the monitoring required by the 2010 LOA and
described in the Monitoring Plan, which included aerial and vessel
surveys of sonar and exercises by dedicated MMOs, passive acoustic
monitoring utilizing high-frequency acoustic recording packages
(HARPs), and marine mammal tagging and tracking. The Navy submitted
their 2010 Monitoring Report, which is posted on NMFS' Web site (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm), within the required
timeframe. The Navy included a summary of their 2010 monitoring effort
and results (beginning on page 182 of the monitoring report) and the
specific reports for each individual effort are presented in the
appendices. Because data is gathered through August 1 and the report is
due in October, some of the data analysis will occur in the subsequent
year's report. Navy-funded marine mammal monitoring accomplishments
within SOCAL for the past year include the following:
Visual Surveys
The Navy completed a total of 1,061 hours of visual surveys during
or after training events. During this time, there were 331 sightings of
approximately 29,269 marine mammals and 26.3 hours of detailed
behavioral focal follows were recorded. Preliminary results from a
single survey show that the most frequent initial behavioral state
observed for common dolphins and fin whales was traveling. While fin
whales were only observed traveling (although sometimes at different
speeds), common dolphins were also observed logging, milling, and
resting. There was one interesting observation of a minke whale
breaching at a time when no active sonar was being used and no Navy
vessels were in the area. The Navy plans to upload visual data from the
aerial surveys to OBIS-SEAMAP, a spatially referenced online database,
by summer 2011.
Marine Mammal Observations
A total of 144 hours of marine mammal observer (MMO) effort was
completed during Navy training events. Of the 210 Navy marine mammal
sightings during MTEs, there were 62 sightings of 306 marine mammals
within 1,000 yards that qualified as mitigation events. Of the 306
individuals observed, 71 percent were dolphins, 16 percent were whales,
and 12 percent were pinnipeds. Of the 62 mitigation events, sonar was
turned off during 29 periods and turned down during 27 periods. The
remaining six periods when mitigation did not occur were explained due
to bowriding dolphins (for which there is an exception in the shutdown
requirements) or marine mammals leaving a mitigation zone. In total,
the Navy lost a minimum of 20 hours of training time due to mitigation
events. There were no reports of marine mammals behaving in any unusual
manner during these events.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Two Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) devices were deployed for a
total of 15,335 hours of high-frequency acoustic recording package
(HARP) recordings before, during, and after
[[Page 4872]]
Navy training exercises. The devices detected at least 11 different
marine mammal species during the monitoring period. Recordings from the
delphinid species have been incorporated into a larger database of
cetacean acoustic data and there are several current projects assessing
clicks and/or whistles for species- and population-specific call
structures.
Tagging
A total of 19 satellite tags were deployed on five different
species of marine mammals. Highlights from the tagging results show
long-term movement of Cuvier's beaked whales, one of the first
indications that Southern California beaked whales may engage in non-
local, out of area movement. Movements of a fin whale over a 160-day
period have also been recorded.
In conclusion, the Navy's implementation of the monitoring plan
accomplished several goals, primarily through contributions to larger
bodies of data intended to better characterize the abundance,
distribution, life history, and behaviors of the species in the SOCAL
Range Complex. The monitoring satisfied the objectives of the
monitoring plan and specifically contributed to a greater knowledge and
understanding of: The density and distribution of species within the
SOCAL Range Complex, which will be added to a growing database of
marine mammal aggregations around the world; the vocalizations of
different species, which contributes to the development of automated
classification software; the movement patterns of individuals (both
vertically in the water column on a daily basis, as well as
horizontally over weeks and months); and the observable behavioral
patterns of marine mammals, both with and without exposure to Navy
training activities.
Except as described below in the Adaptive Management section, NMFS
concludes that the results of these monitoring efforts, when taken
together with the findings presented in the 2010 exercise report (see
Annual Exercise Report section), do not warrant making changes to the
current monitoring and mitigation requirements identified in the LOA.
While the data collected by the Navy through monitoring and reporting
builds on the existing body of information in a valuable way, none of
the new data contradict, or amend, the assumptions that underlie the
findings in the 2009 rule in a manner that would suggest that the
mitigation or monitoring should change.
Adaptive Management
NMFS and the Navy conducted an adaptive management meeting in
October, 2010, which representatives from the Marine Mammal Commission
participated in, wherein we reviewed the Navy monitoring results
through August 1, 2010, discussed other Navy research and development
efforts, and discussed other new information that could potentially
inform decisions regarding Navy mitigation and monitoring. Based on the
implementation of the 2010 monitoring, the Navy proposed some slight
modifications to their monitoring plan for 2011, which NMFS agreed were
appropriate. Beyond those changes, none of the information discussed
led NMFS to recommend any modifications to the existing mitigation or
monitoring measures. The final modifications to the monitoring plan and
justifications are described in Section 13 of the Navy's 2011 LOA
Application, which may be viewed at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Integrated Comprehensive Monitoring Report
The 2010 LOA required that the Navy update the ICMP Plan to reflect
development in three areas, specifically: (1) Identifying more specific
monitoring sub-goals under the major goals that have been identified;
(2) characterizing Navy Range Complexes and study areas within the
context of the prioritization guidelines described in the ICMP Plan;
and (3) continuing to develop data management, organization, and access
procedures. The Navy has updated the ICMP Plan as required. Because the
ICMP is an evolving Program, we have posted the ICMP on NMFS Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm and are specifically
requesting input, which the Navy and NMFS will consider and apply as
appropriate.
Further, the Navy convened a monitoring meeting in October, 2010 to
solicit input from NMFS and marine mammal and acoustic scientists
regarding the comprehensive development and improvement of the more
specific monitoring that should occur across the Navy's training areas.
Subsequent to those discussions, the Navy has developed a scientific
advisory group composed of individuals from the research community and
academia that will develop a proposed Strategic Plan for Navy
monitoring that better considers the biological, logistical, and
resource-specific factors that are applicable in each training area
(and which are summarized in the updated ICMP) to maximize the
effectiveness of Navy monitoring within the context of the information
that is most needed. Subsequently, NMFS and MMC representatives will
review this proposed Strategic Plan for marine species monitoring,
which may reflect monitoring differences in some Navy training areas
from what is required in the 2010 LOA.
This Navy-wide Strategic Monitoring Plan will then be available for
review and discussion at the required 2011 Navy Monitoring Meeting,
which will take place in mid-2011. The Navy and NMFS will then modify
the Navy-wide Strategic Plan for monitoring based on applicable input
from the 2011 Monitoring Meeting and propose appropriate changes to the
monitoring measures in specific LOAs for the different Range Complexes
and training areas. For training areas with substantive monitoring
modifications, NMFS will subsequently publish proposed LOAs, with the
modifications, in the Federal Register and solicit public input. After
addressing public comments and making changes as appropriate, NMFS
would, as appropriate, issue new LOAs for the different training areas
that reflect the updated ICMP and associated new Strategic Plan for
Navy monitoring.
Whale Strikes in 2009
In 2009, a Navy vessel associated with the activities covered by
the 2009 SOCAL Range Complex regulations collided with and injured or
killed two large whales. Of note, in both cases, the Navy was in
compliance with the mitigation and monitoring measures required by the
rule and LOA, contacted NMFS in a timely manner, and provided the
specific information outlined in the SOCAL Stranding Response Plan for
whale strikes, as well as additional information. Due to these
incidents, NMFS is working on a proposed modification to the 2009 SOCAL
rule, which will establish a framework to authorize the incidental take
of large whales by injury or mortality for the remainder of the five-
year regulatory period.
Authorization
The Navy complied with the requirements of the 2010 LOA. Based on
our review of the record, NMFS has determined that the marine mammal
take resulting from the 2010 military readiness training and research
activities falls within the levels previously anticipated, analyzed,
and authorized. Further, the level of taking authorized in 2011 for the
Navy's SOCAL Range Complex activities is
[[Page 4873]]
consistent with our previous findings made for the total taking allowed
under the SOCAL Range Complex regulations. Finally, the record supports
NMFS' conclusion that the total number of marine mammals taken by the
2011 activities in the SOCAL Range Complex will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species or stock of marine mammals
and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of
these species or stocks for taking for subsistence uses. Accordingly,
NMFS has issued a one-year LOA for Navy training exercises conducted in
the SOCAL Range Complex from January 22, 2011, through January 21,
2012.
Dated: January 21, 2011.
Helen M. Golde,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-1847 Filed 1-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P