Coconino and Kaibab National Forests, Arizona, Four Forest Restoration Initiative, 4279-4281 [2011-1444]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Phillip B. Grove, Regulatory
Coordinator, Regulatory Coordination
and Compliance, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 156, Riverdale, MD
20737–1236; (301) 734–6280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ‘‘Subpart—
Fruits and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–1
through 319.56–50, referred to below as
the regulations), the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
prohibits or restricts the importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being
introduced into and spread within the
United States.
Section 319.56–4 contains a
performance-based process for
approving the importation of
commodities that, based on the findings
of a pest risk analysis, can be safely
imported subject to one or more of the
designated phytosanitary measures
listed in paragraph (b) of that section.
These measures are:
• The fruits or vegetables are subject
to inspection upon arrival in the United
States and comply with all applicable
provisions of § 319.56–3;
• The fruits or vegetables are
imported from a pest-free area in the
country of origin that meets the
requirements of § 319.56–5 for freedom
from that pest and are accompanied by
a phytosanitary certificate stating that
the fruits or vegetables originated in a
pest-free area in the country of origin;
• The fruits or vegetables are treated
in accordance with 7 CFR part 305;
• The fruits or vegetables are
inspected in the country of origin by an
inspector or an official of the national
plant protection organization of the
exporting country, and have been found
free of one or more specific quarantine
pests identified by the risk assessment
as likely to follow the import pathway;
and/or
• The fruits or vegetables are a
commercial consignment.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jan 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
APHIS received a request from the
Government of El Salvador to allow the
importation of edible fresh flowers of
izote (Yucca guatemalensis Baker),
immature inflorescences of pacaya
(Chamaedorea tepejilote Liem.),
immature inflorescences of chufle
(Calathea macrosepala K. Schumm),
and fresh leaves of Chipilin (Crotalaria
longirostrata Hook and Arn.) from El
Salvador into the continental United
States. We have completed four pest risk
assessments to identify pests of
quarantine significance that could
follow the pathway of importation into
the United States and, based on those
pest risk assessments, have prepared
three risk management documents to
identify phytosanitary measures that
could be applied to fresh edible flowers
of izote, immature inflorescences of
pacaya, immature inflorescences of
chufle, and fresh leaves of chipilin to
mitigate the pest risk. We have
concluded that fresh edible flowers of
izote, immature inflorescences of
pacaya, immature inflorescences of
chufle, and fresh leaves of chipilin can
be safely imported into the continental
United States from El Salvador using
one or more of the five designated
phytosanitary measures listed in
§ 319.56–4(b). Therefore, in accordance
with § 319.56–4(c), we are announcing
the availability of our pest risk analyses
for public review and comment. The
pest risk analyses may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site or in our
reading room (see ADDRESSES above for
a link to Regulations.gov and
information on the location and hours of
the reading room). You may request
paper copies of the pest risk analyses by
calling or writing to the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Please refer to the subject of
the pest risk analysis you wish to review
when requesting copies.
After reviewing any comments we
receive, we will announce our decision
regarding the import status of fresh
edible flowers of izote, immature
inflorescences of pacaya, immature
inflorescences of chufle, and fresh
leaves of chipilin from El Salvador in a
subsequent notice. If the overall
conclusions of the analysis and the
Administrator’s determination of risk
remain unchanged following our
consideration of the comments, then we
will begin issuing permits for
importation of fresh edible flowers of
izote, immature inflorescences of
pacaya, immature inflorescences of
chufle, and fresh leaves of chipilin from
El Salvador into the continental United
States subject to the requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4279
specified in the risk management
documents.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
January 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–1509 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Coconino and Kaibab National Forests,
Arizona, Four Forest Restoration
Initiative
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coconino and Kaibab
National Forests are proposing to
conduct restoration activities within a
750,000 acre ponderosa pine ecosystem
over approximately 10 years. Treatment
areas are located on the Williams and
Tusayan districts of the Kaibab National
Forest and on the Flagstaff, Mogollon
Rim and Red Rock districts of the
Coconino National Forest. Project
treatments would occur in the vicinity
of Flagstaff, Munds Park, Mormon
Lakes, Tusayan, and Williams, Arizona.
The objective of this project is to reestablish forest structure, pattern and
composition, which will lead to
increased forest resiliency and function.
Resiliency increases the ability of the
ponderosa pine forest to survive natural
disturbances such as insect and disease,
fire and climate change.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
March 11, 2011. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected in October, 2011 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected April, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Coconino National Forest, Attention:
4FRI, 1814 S. Thompson Street,
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001. Comments
may also be sent via e-mail to
4FRI_comments@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to (928) 527–3620.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Henry Provencio, 4FRI Team Leader at
(928) 226–4684 or via e-mail at
hprovencio@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
4280
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
Reduced forest health and the lack of
diversity have resulted in a forest that
is less resilient to the damaging effects
of drought, insect and disease, and
intense wildfire. The desired condition
is to move towards an uneven-aged
forest structure with all size classes
represented. There is a need to improve
forest structure and maintain the forest
mosaic with frequent, low intensity fire.
There is a need to implement the forest
plan which states, ‘‘Manage for old age
trees such that as much old forest
structure as possible is sustained over
time across the landscape’’ (USDA
Forest Service 1987, as amended).
Vegetation diversity throughout the
analysis area has declined. The desired
condition is to have Gambel oak and
aspen present and reproducing. There is
a need to maintain and promote Gambel
oak by removing ponderosa pine
competition, stimulating new growth,
and maintaining growth in large
diameter trees. Where possible, there is
a need to regenerate aspen by removing
ponderosa pine competition,
stimulating growth and increasing
individual recruitment.
Grasslands (which includes wet and
dry meadows), which were once found
throughout the analysis area, have
shifted to woody vegetation as a result
of tree encroachment (USDA Forest
Service 2008) (USDA Forest Service
2009). The desired condition is to
restore the historic patterns of trees
within grasslands. There is a need to
reduce/remove tree encroachment from
historic grasslands. To maintain Gambel
oak, aspen and grasslands, there is a
need to reduce canopy density by
thinning ponderosa pine encroachment.
Fire regimes in the analysis area have
shifted from frequent, low-intensity
surface fires (Fire Regime Condition
Class (FRCC I) to lower frequency, highintensity crown fires (FRCC III). The
desired condition is to have the majority
of the analysis area in FRCC I. There is
a need to reduce the potential for crown
fire and high intensity surface fire. In
order to maintain grassy openings and
interspaces between trees (as well as
promote Gambel oak and aspen), there
is a need to move towards having
frequent fires that burn with low to
mixed severity in 0 to 35 year intervals
across most of the analysis area. There
is a need to strategically place
treatments to reduce the effects of high
intensity and high severity wildfire on
resources (such as sensitive wildlife
habitat and the urban interface).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jan 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
Riparian systems on the Coconino
portion of the analysis area have shifted
from having large trees with open
canopies to small and medium trees
with closed canopies. Understory
vegetation has been reduced (USDA
Forest Service 2009). The desired
condition is to promote large trees and
understory vegetation. There is a need
to reduce tree encroachment and
increase/maintain grasses, forbs and
woody vegetation. There is a lack of
recharge in the aquifers associated with
springs and seeps due to drought, lack
of fire, and closed forest canopies which
increase evapotranspiration. The
desired condition is to maintain or
restore functionality. In order to restore
functionality, there is a need to reduce
tree encroachment, maintain these
features through natural processes, and
limit future disturbance where possible
and practical.
Throughout the analysis area, dry
ephemeral channels have been degraded
by past actions. The desired condition is
to have fully functioning ephemeral
channels which may promote the
establishment of native vegetation and
reduced sediment flows. There is a need
to restore channels to a functioning
condition that more closely resembles
their natural state.
Throughout the analysis area, there
are closed roads and unauthorized usercreated routes present. Some road
prisms, which were identified for
closure in other environmental analyses,
are eroding and contributing sediment.
The desired condition is to return road
prisms (as possible and practical) to
their natural condition. There is a need
to promote and maintain vegetation reestablishment and physically preclude
future motorized use on select closed
roads and user-created routes.
Proposed Action
In response to the purpose and need,
the Coconino and Kaibab National
Forests propose to conduct restoration
activities within a 750,000 acre
ponderosa pine ecosystem over
approximately a 10-year period. The
draft proposed action would:
* Cut trees using a range of treatment
methods including group selection,
intermediate and pre-commercial
thinning. Treatments would focus on
the most abundant tree size classes in
order to achieve and/or set the analysis
area on the trajectory to attain greater
diversity (heterogeneity) in spatial
patterns and size class distribution.
Treatments would be designed to
manage for old age trees in order to have
and sustain as much old forest structure
as possible across the landscape.
Strategically-placed treatments would
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be designed to create tree groups and
clumps that stimulate grass, forbs and
individual tree growth. The strategic
placement of treatments would
maximize the ability to reduce fire risk.
Trees cut would be mechanically piled,
burned, lopped and scattered or
removed.
* Cut trees using methods that
promote and stimulate the growth of
Gambel oak and aspen in order to
improve vegetation diversity and
wildlife habitat. Protective measures
(such as fencing or tree felling) would
be used to protect aspen from ungulate
use during critical growth periods.
* Cut trees that have encroached on
grasslands (including wet and dry
meadows) to restore historic tree
patterns using evidence based science as
a guide. After treatment and when
appropriate, fire would be used to
maintain the grasslands.
* Cut trees within select Mexican
spotted Owl Protected Activity Centers
(PACs) to improve habitat.
* Conduct prescribed burning over a
period of 10 years. Burning methods
would include jackpot, pile burning and
broadcast. Maintenance burns would
occur as needed to maintain openings
and interspaces between trees, maintain
tree groups and clumps, and move
towards and/or maintain Fire Regime
Condition Class (FRCC) I.
* Utilize protective measures (such as
fencing) to protect sensitive riparian
resources including springs, seeps and
restored channels.
* Restore dry ephemeral channels to
reduce sediment delivery, improve
watershed function and increase the
potential for future riparian vegetation
establishment.
* Utilize (and reconstruct as needed)
existing closed roads. Use of the roads
would be temporary. Once treatment
has occurred, roads would be returned
to a closed status.
* Reconstruct roads to access
treatment areas. Reconstruction may
include road blading, culvert
installation or replacement and
gravelling.
* Decommission select closed and
unauthorized roads. Decommission
methods would include installing signs,
gates, rock barriers, ripping, or recontouring of slopes to preclude future
motorized use. Roads that have
established vegetation may need
minimal treatment while others may
need to be entirely ripped, seeded and
slopes re-contoured.
* Obliterate select unauthorized,
user-created routes on the Kaibab
National Forest. Mechanical equipment
would be used to install rock barriers
and/or rip, seed and re-contour slopes.
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Notices
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Possible Alternatives
A full range of alternatives to the
proposed action, including a no-action
alternative, will be considered. The noaction alternative represents no change
and serves as the baseline for the
comparison among the action
alternatives.
Dated: January 19, 2011.
Kristin M. Bail,
Deputy Forest Supervisor, Coconino National
Forest.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Officials are the
Coconino Forest Supervisor and Kaibab
Forest Supervisor.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Given the purpose and need of the
project, the Forest Supervisors will
review the proposed action, other
alternatives and the environmental
consequences in order to make the
following decisions including
determining: (1) Whether to select the
proposed action or another alternative;
(2) the location, design, and scheduling
of proposed restoration activities; (3) the
estimated products, if any, to be made
available from the project; (4) mitigation
measures, monitoring requirements and
adaptive management actions; and, (5)
whether forest plan amendments are
needed.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Several workshops
are planned for the purposes of
discussing and refining the proposed
action. Workshops begin on January 20,
2011 and continue throughout February
2011. February workshop dates are:
February 2, 9, 16, and 24, 2011. All
workshops begin at 1 p.m. and end at
5 p.m. With the exception of the
February 9, 2011 meeting, all workshops
will be held at the Coconino National
Forest Supervisor’s Office, 1824 S.
Thompson Street, Flagstaff, AZ 86101.
The February 9, 2011 workshop will be
held at the Williams Ranger District, 742
South Clover Road, Williams, Arizona.
Please contact Paula Cote’ at (928) 226–
4686 for additional information.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jan 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–1444 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
Forest Service
Manti-La Sal National Forest Resource
Advisory Committee
4281
following business will be conducted:
(1) Consideration of Project Funding
Proposals. (2) Public comment. Persons
who wish to bring related matters to the
attention of the Committee may file
written statements with the Committee
staff before or after the meeting. Public
input sessions will be provided and
individuals who made written requests
by February 11, 2010 will have the
opportunity to address the Comittee at
those sessions.
Dated: January 19, 2011.
Marlene DePietro,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–1459 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
The Manti-La Sal National
Forest Resource Advisory Committee
will meet in Price, Utah. The committee
is meeting as authorized under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110–
343) and in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the meeting is to consider project
proposals.
DATES: The meeting will be held
February 16, 2011, and will begin at 9
a.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
the conference room of the Utah
Division of Wildlife Resources Building,
319 North Carbonville Road, Price,
Utah. Written comments should be sent
to Rosann Fillmore, Manti-La Sal
National Forest, 599 West Price River
Drive, Price, UT 84501. Comments may
also be sent via e-mail to
rdfillmore@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to
435–637–4940.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at the MantiLa Sal National Forest, 599 West Price
River Drive, Price, UT 84501. Visitors
are encouraged to call ahead to 435–
636–3525 to facilitate entry into the
building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rosann Fillmore, RAC coordinator,
USDA, Manti-La Sal National Forest,
599 West Price River Drive, Price, UT
84501; 435–636–3525; e-mail
rdfillmore@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. The
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forest Service
Recreation Resource Advisory
Committees Charter Reestablishment
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to reestablish
the Recreation Resource Advisory
Committees.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Secretary of Agriculture
intends to reestablish the charter for 5
Forest Service Recreation Resource
Advisory Committees (Recreation RACs)
pursuant to Section 4 of the Federal
Lands Recreation Enhancement Act
passed into law as part of the 2005
Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub.
L. 108–447) on December 8, 2004. The
Recreation RACs operate in the Pacific
Northwest, Pacific Southwest, Eastern,
and Southern Regions of the Forest
Service and the State of Colorado, and
provide recreation fee recommendations
to both the Forest Service and the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as
appropriate.
DATES: As required by the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, charters for
federal advisory committees must be
renewed every 2 years. The current
charter for the Recreation RACs expired
on October 2, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Cox, National Recreation RAC
Coordinator, USDA Forest Service,
Pacific Northwest Region, 333 SW 1st
Avenue, Portland, OR 97208, 503–808–
2984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Federal Lands Recreation
Enhancement Act (REA), signed in
December 2004, directs the Secretary of
Agriculture, the Secretary of the
Interior, or both to establish Recreation
RACs, or use existing advisory
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4279-4281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1444]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Coconino and Kaibab National Forests, Arizona, Four Forest
Restoration Initiative
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coconino and Kaibab National Forests are proposing to
conduct restoration activities within a 750,000 acre ponderosa pine
ecosystem over approximately 10 years. Treatment areas are located on
the Williams and Tusayan districts of the Kaibab National Forest and on
the Flagstaff, Mogollon Rim and Red Rock districts of the Coconino
National Forest. Project treatments would occur in the vicinity of
Flagstaff, Munds Park, Mormon Lakes, Tusayan, and Williams, Arizona.
The objective of this project is to re-establish forest structure,
pattern and composition, which will lead to increased forest resiliency
and function. Resiliency increases the ability of the ponderosa pine
forest to survive natural disturbances such as insect and disease, fire
and climate change.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by March 11, 2011. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
in October, 2011 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected April, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Coconino National Forest,
Attention: 4FRI, 1814 S. Thompson Street, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to 4FRI_comments@fs.fed.us, or
via facsimile to (928) 527-3620.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Henry Provencio, 4FRI Team Leader at
(928) 226-4684 or via e-mail at hprovencio@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
[[Page 4280]]
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
Reduced forest health and the lack of diversity have resulted in a
forest that is less resilient to the damaging effects of drought,
insect and disease, and intense wildfire. The desired condition is to
move towards an uneven-aged forest structure with all size classes
represented. There is a need to improve forest structure and maintain
the forest mosaic with frequent, low intensity fire. There is a need to
implement the forest plan which states, ``Manage for old age trees such
that as much old forest structure as possible is sustained over time
across the landscape'' (USDA Forest Service 1987, as amended).
Vegetation diversity throughout the analysis area has declined. The
desired condition is to have Gambel oak and aspen present and
reproducing. There is a need to maintain and promote Gambel oak by
removing ponderosa pine competition, stimulating new growth, and
maintaining growth in large diameter trees. Where possible, there is a
need to regenerate aspen by removing ponderosa pine competition,
stimulating growth and increasing individual recruitment.
Grasslands (which includes wet and dry meadows), which were once
found throughout the analysis area, have shifted to woody vegetation as
a result of tree encroachment (USDA Forest Service 2008) (USDA Forest
Service 2009). The desired condition is to restore the historic
patterns of trees within grasslands. There is a need to reduce/remove
tree encroachment from historic grasslands. To maintain Gambel oak,
aspen and grasslands, there is a need to reduce canopy density by
thinning ponderosa pine encroachment.
Fire regimes in the analysis area have shifted from frequent, low-
intensity surface fires (Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC I) to lower
frequency, high-intensity crown fires (FRCC III). The desired condition
is to have the majority of the analysis area in FRCC I. There is a need
to reduce the potential for crown fire and high intensity surface fire.
In order to maintain grassy openings and interspaces between trees (as
well as promote Gambel oak and aspen), there is a need to move towards
having frequent fires that burn with low to mixed severity in 0 to 35
year intervals across most of the analysis area. There is a need to
strategically place treatments to reduce the effects of high intensity
and high severity wildfire on resources (such as sensitive wildlife
habitat and the urban interface).
Riparian systems on the Coconino portion of the analysis area have
shifted from having large trees with open canopies to small and medium
trees with closed canopies. Understory vegetation has been reduced
(USDA Forest Service 2009). The desired condition is to promote large
trees and understory vegetation. There is a need to reduce tree
encroachment and increase/maintain grasses, forbs and woody vegetation.
There is a lack of recharge in the aquifers associated with springs and
seeps due to drought, lack of fire, and closed forest canopies which
increase evapotranspiration. The desired condition is to maintain or
restore functionality. In order to restore functionality, there is a
need to reduce tree encroachment, maintain these features through
natural processes, and limit future disturbance where possible and
practical.
Throughout the analysis area, dry ephemeral channels have been
degraded by past actions. The desired condition is to have fully
functioning ephemeral channels which may promote the establishment of
native vegetation and reduced sediment flows. There is a need to
restore channels to a functioning condition that more closely resembles
their natural state.
Throughout the analysis area, there are closed roads and
unauthorized user-created routes present. Some road prisms, which were
identified for closure in other environmental analyses, are eroding and
contributing sediment. The desired condition is to return road prisms
(as possible and practical) to their natural condition. There is a need
to promote and maintain vegetation re-establishment and physically
preclude future motorized use on select closed roads and user-created
routes.
Proposed Action
In response to the purpose and need, the Coconino and Kaibab
National Forests propose to conduct restoration activities within a
750,000 acre ponderosa pine ecosystem over approximately a 10-year
period. The draft proposed action would:
* Cut trees using a range of treatment methods including group
selection, intermediate and pre-commercial thinning. Treatments would
focus on the most abundant tree size classes in order to achieve and/or
set the analysis area on the trajectory to attain greater diversity
(heterogeneity) in spatial patterns and size class distribution.
Treatments would be designed to manage for old age trees in order to
have and sustain as much old forest structure as possible across the
landscape. Strategically-placed treatments would be designed to create
tree groups and clumps that stimulate grass, forbs and individual tree
growth. The strategic placement of treatments would maximize the
ability to reduce fire risk. Trees cut would be mechanically piled,
burned, lopped and scattered or removed.
* Cut trees using methods that promote and stimulate the growth of
Gambel oak and aspen in order to improve vegetation diversity and
wildlife habitat. Protective measures (such as fencing or tree felling)
would be used to protect aspen from ungulate use during critical growth
periods.
* Cut trees that have encroached on grasslands (including wet and
dry meadows) to restore historic tree patterns using evidence based
science as a guide. After treatment and when appropriate, fire would be
used to maintain the grasslands.
* Cut trees within select Mexican spotted Owl Protected Activity
Centers (PACs) to improve habitat.
* Conduct prescribed burning over a period of 10 years. Burning
methods would include jackpot, pile burning and broadcast. Maintenance
burns would occur as needed to maintain openings and interspaces
between trees, maintain tree groups and clumps, and move towards and/or
maintain Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) I.
* Utilize protective measures (such as fencing) to protect
sensitive riparian resources including springs, seeps and restored
channels.
* Restore dry ephemeral channels to reduce sediment delivery,
improve watershed function and increase the potential for future
riparian vegetation establishment.
* Utilize (and reconstruct as needed) existing closed roads. Use of
the roads would be temporary. Once treatment has occurred, roads would
be returned to a closed status.
* Reconstruct roads to access treatment areas. Reconstruction may
include road blading, culvert installation or replacement and
gravelling.
* Decommission select closed and unauthorized roads. Decommission
methods would include installing signs, gates, rock barriers, ripping,
or re-contouring of slopes to preclude future motorized use. Roads that
have established vegetation may need minimal treatment while others may
need to be entirely ripped, seeded and slopes re-contoured.
* Obliterate select unauthorized, user-created routes on the Kaibab
National Forest. Mechanical equipment would be used to install rock
barriers and/or rip, seed and re-contour slopes.
[[Page 4281]]
Possible Alternatives
A full range of alternatives to the proposed action, including a
no-action alternative, will be considered. The no-action alternative
represents no change and serves as the baseline for the comparison
among the action alternatives.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Officials are the Coconino Forest Supervisor and
Kaibab Forest Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Given the purpose and need of the project, the Forest Supervisors
will review the proposed action, other alternatives and the
environmental consequences in order to make the following decisions
including determining: (1) Whether to select the proposed action or
another alternative; (2) the location, design, and scheduling of
proposed restoration activities; (3) the estimated products, if any, to
be made available from the project; (4) mitigation measures, monitoring
requirements and adaptive management actions; and, (5) whether forest
plan amendments are needed.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Several
workshops are planned for the purposes of discussing and refining the
proposed action. Workshops begin on January 20, 2011 and continue
throughout February 2011. February workshop dates are: February 2, 9,
16, and 24, 2011. All workshops begin at 1 p.m. and end at 5 p.m. With
the exception of the February 9, 2011 meeting, all workshops will be
held at the Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office, 1824 S.
Thompson Street, Flagstaff, AZ 86101. The February 9, 2011 workshop
will be held at the Williams Ranger District, 742 South Clover Road,
Williams, Arizona. Please contact Paula Cote' at (928) 226-4686 for
additional information.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however.
Dated: January 19, 2011.
Kristin M. Bail,
Deputy Forest Supervisor, Coconino National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-1444 Filed 1-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M