Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 22 Under Alternative Site Framework; Chicago, IL, 4285 [2011-1389]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 25, 2011 / Notices
qualified corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign-trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection ports of entry;
Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15
CFR part 400) provide for the
establishment of special-purpose
subzones when existing zone facilities
cannot serve the specific use involved,
and when the activity results in a
significant public benefit and is in the
public interest;
Whereas, the City of Baltimore,
Maryland, grantee of Foreign-Trade
Zone 74, has made application to the
Board for authority to establish a
special-purpose subzone at the garlic
products manufacturing facility of
Tulkoff Food Products, Inc., located in
Baltimore, Maryland (FTZ Docket 32–
2009, filed 8–3–2009);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (74 FR 40567, 8–12–2009) and
the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations would be satisfied,
and that the proposal would be in the
public interest if subject to the
restrictions listed below;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
grants authority for subzone status for
activity related to the manufacture of
garlic products at the Tulkoff Food
Products, Inc., facility located in
Baltimore, Maryland (Subzone 74C), as
described in the application and
Federal Register notice, subject to the
FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.28, and further
subject to the following conditions:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
1. All foreign-origin dehydrated garlic
admitted to the subzone in foreign status
must be re-exported.
2. All foreign-origin dehydrated garlic to be
used in production for U.S. consumption
must be admitted to the subzone in domestic
(duty-paid) status (19 CFR 146.43).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of
January 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1382 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Jan 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
4285
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 3510–
DS–P
status merchandise is admitted for a
bona fide customs purpose by January
31, 2014.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12 day of
January 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board.
[Order No. 1738]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
22 Under Alternative Site Framework;
Chicago, IL
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) in
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09;
correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09; 75 FR
71069–71070, 11/22/10) as an option for
the establishment or reorganization of
general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Illinois International
Port District, grantee of Foreign-Trade
Zone 22, submitted an application to the
Board (FTZ Docket 33–2010, filed 5/7/
2010) for authority to reorganize under
the ASF with a service area of Cook, Du
Page, Grundy, Kankakee, Kendall, Lake
and Will Counties and portions of
McHenry and Kane Counties, Illinois, in
and adjacent to the Chicago Customs
and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ
22’s existing Sites 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11,
13 and 15 would be categorized as
magnet sites, existing Sites 3, 4, 9, 12,
14, 16, 17 and 18 as usage-driven sites,
and the grantee proposes one initial
usage-driven site (Site 19);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (75 FR 27983–27984, 5/19/
2010) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 22
under the alternative site framework is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the
overall general-purpose zone project, to
a five-year ASF sunset provision for
magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11,
13 and 15 if not activated by January 31,
2016, and to a three-year ASF sunset
provision for usage-driven sites that
would terminate authority for Sites 3, 4,
9, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 if no foreign-
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1389 Filed 1–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–827]
Certain Cased Pencils From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With
Final Results of Administrative Review
and Notice of Amended Final Results
of Administrative Review Pursuant to
Court Decision
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 3, 2011, the
United States Court of International
Trade (‘‘CIT’’) sustained in an
unpublished judgment the Department
of Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’)
results of redetermination as applied to
respondents China First Pencil Co., Ltd.
(‘‘China First’’) and Shanghai Three Star
Stationery Industry Corp. (‘‘Three Star’’)
and separate rate company Orient
International Holding Shanghai Foreign
Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘SFTC’’) pursuant to the
CIT’s remand order in China First Pencil
Co., Ltd. v. United States, 721 F. Supp.
2d 1369 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2010) (‘‘China
First’’). See Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Remand,
Court No. 09–00325, dated December
20, 2010, available at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/remands (‘‘Remand
Results’’); China First Pencil Co., Ltd. v.
United States, Court No. 09–00325 (Ct.
Int’l Trade January 3, 2011) (judgment).
Consistent with the decision of the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co.
v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States,—F.3d—Court No. 2010–
1024, –1090 (Fed. Cir. December 9,
2010) (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the
Department is notifying the public that
the final judgment in this case is not in
harmony with the Department’s final
determination and is amending the final
results of the administrative review of
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1389]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 3510-DS-P
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1738]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 22 Under Alternative Site
Framework; Chicago, IL
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09;
75 FR 71069-71070, 11/22/10) as an option for the establishment or
reorganization of general-purpose zones;
Whereas, the Illinois International Port District, grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone 22, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ
Docket 33-2010, filed 5/7/2010) for authority to reorganize under the
ASF with a service area of Cook, Du Page, Grundy, Kankakee, Kendall,
Lake and Will Counties and portions of McHenry and Kane Counties,
Illinois, in and adjacent to the Chicago Customs and Border Protection
port of entry, FTZ 22's existing Sites 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 and
15 would be categorized as magnet sites, existing Sites 3, 4, 9, 12,
14, 16, 17 and 18 as usage-driven sites, and the grantee proposes one
initial usage-driven site (Site 19);
Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal
Register (75 FR 27983-27984, 5/19/2010) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the
public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 22 under the alternative site
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, to
a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 15 if not activated
by January 31, 2016, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for
usage-driven sites that would terminate authority for Sites 3, 4, 9,
12, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted
for a bona fide customs purpose by January 31, 2014.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12 day of January 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-1389 Filed 1-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
