Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan and Operating Permits Program; State of Missouri, 4076-4078 [2011-229]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
4076
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 30, 2010.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
(xi) Instead of using Form VA, an
applicant may submit an electronic
application for group registration of
published photographs after
consultation and with the permission
and under the direction of the Visual
Arts Division.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–1332 Filed 1–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
3. Amend § 202.20 as follows:
■ a. By amending (c)(2)(vii)(D)(5) to add
‘‘or in the case of electronically
submitted applications for automated
databases that predominantly consist of
photographs, the claimant shall deposit
identifying portions that comply with
(D)(8) of this section; the claimant shall’’
after ‘‘if unpublished,’’ and deleting ‘‘and
shall’’ before ‘‘also deposit’’;
■ b. By adding new paragraph
(c)(2)(vii)(D)(8);
■ c. By amending the introductory text
in paragraph (c)(2)(xx) to add ‘‘and for
automated databases that consist
predominantly of photographs
registered with an application submitted
electronically under § 202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A)’’
after ‘‘(group registration of published
photographs)’’, by removing
‘‘202.3(b)(3)(i)(B)’’ and adding
‘‘202.3(b)(4)(i)(B)’’ in its place; and by
removing ‘‘202.3(b)(9)’’ and adding
‘‘202.3(b)(10)’’ in its place; and
■ d. By amending paragraph
(c)(2)(xx)(F) to add ‘‘or database’’ after
‘‘included in the group’’ and to remove
‘‘202.3(b)(9)’’ and add ‘‘202.3(b)(10)’’ in
its place.
The revisions and additions to
§ 202.20 read as follows:
■
§ 202.20 Deposit of copies and
phonorecords for copyright registration.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) In the case of an application
submitted electronically for registration
of a database that consists
predominantly of photographs
(including a group registration for
revised or updated versions of such a
database), ‘‘identifying portions’’ shall
instead consist of all individual
photographs included in the claim
either in one of the formats set forth in
paragraph (c)(2)(xx) of this section or in
an electronic format submitted along
with the electronic application after
consultation and with the permission
and under the direction of the Visual
Arts Division.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Jan 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA–R07–OAR–2010–0176; FRL–9248–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plan and Operating
Permits Program; State of Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to
Missouri’s State Implementation Plan
(SIP) and Operating Permits Program.
EPA is approving the rescission of
initial compliance dates in the Missouri
SIP. These requirements were
established more than thirty years ago
and are obsolete. EPA is also approving
revisions to the Operating Permits
Program to change the reporting
threshold for small sources and remove
references to the requirement to
annually set the emission fee. Approval
of these revisions will ensure
consistency between the State and the
Federally-approved rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective March 25, 2011, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by February 23, 2011.
If adverse comment is received, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2010–0176, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail:
wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Chrissy
Wolfersberger, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2010–
0176. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding
Federal holidays. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chrissy Wolfersberger at (913) 551–
7864, or by e-mail at
wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or
‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section provides
E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM
24JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
additional information by addressing
the following questions:
What is being addressed in this document?
What action is EPA taking?
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is approving revisions to the
Missouri SIP and Operating Permits
Program. Revisions to the Missouri SIP
rescind three rules related to the time
schedule for initial compliance for
sources existing at the time of
promulgation of the original rules. The
purpose of these rules was to establish
compliance schedules for sources that
were in operation more than 30 years
ago. (For example, 10 CSR 10–5.250
required existing sources to comply
with emissions limitation no later than
January 31, 1973, if they emitted sulfur
dioxide from the use of fuel.) These
rules are identified in the approved SIP
as 10 CSR 10–2.150, 4.140, and 5.250,
applicable to the Kansas City,
Springfield, and St. Louis areas. These
rules are obsolete and no longer needed,
as compliance dates are contained in
other State rules, or, if there is no date
specified, is the effective date of the
rule. Removing them does not adversely
affect the stringency of the SIP. EPA is
approving Missouri’s request to remove
the corresponding Federally-approved
rules from the Missouri SIP.
EPA is also approving revisions to the
Operating Permits Program (10 CSR 10–
6.110). One revision changes the
reporting threshold for small sources, so
that small sources are allowed to fill out
a short emissions form instead of a long
form if they increase or decrease
emissions under a certain threshold.
The threshold would change from an
increase of 20 percent of emissions from
the prior year to 5 tons from the prior
year. Sources with small baseline
emissions might have substantial
percentage increases, but very small
tonnage increases. This revision allows
small sources to continue to report
emissions using a shorter form. The
second revision removes references to
the requirement to annually set the
emission fee, because the Missouri
statute does not require an annual fee
adjustment unless determined necessary
by the Air Conservation Commission.
What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the request to
amend the Missouri SIP by removing
three rules related to the time schedule
for compliance and approving the
request to amend the operating permits
program by changing the reporting
threshold for small sources and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Jan 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
removing references to the requirement
to annually set the emission fee.
Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between State and
Federally-approved rules. EPA has
determined that these changes will not
relax the SIP or adversely impact air
emissions.
We are processing this action as a
direct final action because the revisions
make routine changes to the existing
rules which are noncontroversial and
make regulatory revisions, required by
State statute. Therefore, we do not
anticipate any adverse comments.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on part of this rule and if that
part can be severed from the remainder
of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those parts of the rule that are not the
subject of an adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4077
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by March 25, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM
24JAR1
4078
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects
Intergovernmental relations, Operating
permits, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: December 27, 2010.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended
by revising the entries under Chapter 2
for ‘‘10–2.150,’’ under Chapter 4 for
‘‘10–4.140,’’ and under Chapter 5 for
‘‘10–5.250’’. The amended table reads as
follows:
■
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
§ 52.1320
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
40 CFR Part 70
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
*
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
*
10–2.150 ......
*
*
Time Schedule for Compliance .....
*
*
12/30/2008
*
*
*
1/24/11 [insert FR page number
where the document begins].
*
*
The State has rescinded this rule.
*
*
*
Chapter 4—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for Springfield-Greene County Area
*
*
10–4.140 ......
*
*
Time Schedule for Compliance .....
*
*
12/30/2008
*
*
*
1/24/11 [insert FR page number
where the document begins].
*
*
The State has rescinded this rule.
*
*
*
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
10–5.250 ......
Time Schedule for Compliance .....
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1/24/11 [insert FR page number
where the document begins].
*
*
3. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
Appendix A—[Amended]
4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended
by adding paragraph (y) under Missouri
to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–229 Filed 1–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:38 Jan 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[DA 10–2443; MM Docket No. 99–238; RM–
9669]
(y) The Missouri Department of Natural
Resources submitted revisions to Missouri
rule 10 CSR 10–6.110, ‘‘Submission of
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process
Information’’ on December 30, 2008; approval
of section (3)(D) effective March 25, 2011.
*
*
47 CFR Part 73
*
Missouri
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
■
*
The State has rescinded this rule.
*
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
PART 70—[AMENDED]
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
12/30/2008
Television Broadcasting Services;
North Pole and Plattsburgh, NY
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission grants a
petition for rulemaking filed by Hearst-
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM
24JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4076-4078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-229]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA-R07-OAR-2010-0176; FRL-9248-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan and Operating
Permits Program; State of Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to
Missouri's State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Operating Permits
Program. EPA is approving the rescission of initial compliance dates in
the Missouri SIP. These requirements were established more than thirty
years ago and are obsolete. EPA is also approving revisions to the
Operating Permits Program to change the reporting threshold for small
sources and remove references to the requirement to annually set the
emission fee. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency
between the State and the Federally-approved rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective March 25, 2011, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 23,
2011. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2010-0176, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Chrissy Wolfersberger, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2010-0176. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal
holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in
advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chrissy Wolfersberger at (913) 551-
7864, or by e-mail at wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides
[[Page 4077]]
additional information by addressing the following questions:
What is being addressed in this document?
What action is EPA taking?
What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is approving revisions to the Missouri SIP and Operating
Permits Program. Revisions to the Missouri SIP rescind three rules
related to the time schedule for initial compliance for sources
existing at the time of promulgation of the original rules. The purpose
of these rules was to establish compliance schedules for sources that
were in operation more than 30 years ago. (For example, 10 CSR 10-5.250
required existing sources to comply with emissions limitation no later
than January 31, 1973, if they emitted sulfur dioxide from the use of
fuel.) These rules are identified in the approved SIP as 10 CSR 10-
2.150, 4.140, and 5.250, applicable to the Kansas City, Springfield,
and St. Louis areas. These rules are obsolete and no longer needed, as
compliance dates are contained in other State rules, or, if there is no
date specified, is the effective date of the rule. Removing them does
not adversely affect the stringency of the SIP. EPA is approving
Missouri's request to remove the corresponding Federally-approved rules
from the Missouri SIP.
EPA is also approving revisions to the Operating Permits Program
(10 CSR 10-6.110). One revision changes the reporting threshold for
small sources, so that small sources are allowed to fill out a short
emissions form instead of a long form if they increase or decrease
emissions under a certain threshold. The threshold would change from an
increase of 20 percent of emissions from the prior year to 5 tons from
the prior year. Sources with small baseline emissions might have
substantial percentage increases, but very small tonnage increases.
This revision allows small sources to continue to report emissions
using a shorter form. The second revision removes references to the
requirement to annually set the emission fee, because the Missouri
statute does not require an annual fee adjustment unless determined
necessary by the Air Conservation Commission.
What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the request to amend the Missouri SIP by removing
three rules related to the time schedule for compliance and approving
the request to amend the operating permits program by changing the
reporting threshold for small sources and removing references to the
requirement to annually set the emission fee.
Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between State
and Federally-approved rules. EPA has determined that these changes
will not relax the SIP or adversely impact air emissions.
We are processing this action as a direct final action because the
revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are
noncontroversial and make regulatory revisions, required by State
statute. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please
note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if
that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 25, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
[[Page 4078]]
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 70
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 27, 2010.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320(c) the table is amended by revising the entries
under Chapter 2 for ``10-2.150,'' under Chapter 4 for ``10-4.140,'' and
under Chapter 5 for ``10-5.250''. The amended table reads as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
Missouri citation Title date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-2.150............... Time Schedule for 12/30/2008 1/24/11 [insert FR The State has
Compliance. page number where the rescinded this rule.
document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 4--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for Springfield-Greene County Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-4.140............... Time Schedule for 12/30/2008 1/24/11 [insert FR The State has
Compliance. page number where the rescinded this rule.
document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 5--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-5.250............... Time Schedule for 12/30/2008 1/24/11 [insert FR The State has
Compliance. page number where the rescinded this rule.
document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 70--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Appendix A--[Amended]
0
4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (y) under
Missouri to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
* * * * *
Missouri
* * * * *
(y) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Submission of Emission
Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information'' on December 30, 2008;
approval of section (3)(D) effective March 25, 2011.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-229 Filed 1-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
