National Ocean Council; Development of Strategic Action Plans for the National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes, 4139-4141 [2011-1316]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2011 / Notices
has entered into an additional Global
Reseller Expedited Package (GREP)
contract.1 The Postal Service believes
the instant contract is functionally
equivalent to the previously submitted
GREP contracts, and is supported by
Governors’ Decision No. 10–1, attached
to the Notice and originally filed in
Docket No. CP2010–36. Id. at 1,
Attachment 3. The Notice explains that
Order No. 445, which established GREP
Contracts 1 as a product, also authorized
functionally equivalent agreements to be
included within the product, provided
that they meet the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 1–2. Additionally, the
Postal Service requested to have the
contract in Docket No. CP2010–36 serve
as the baseline contract for future
functional equivalence analyses of the
GREP Contracts 1 product.
The instant contract. The Postal
Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that the
instant contract is in accordance with
Order No. 445. The term of the contract
is 1 year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3. It may, however,
be terminated by either party on not less
than 30 days’ written notice. Id.
Attachment 1, at 5.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed four attachments as
follows:
• Attachment 1—a redacted copy of
the contract and applicable annexes;
• Attachment 2—a certified statement
required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2);
• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 10–1 which
establishes prices and classifications for
GREP contracts, a description of
applicable GREP contracts, formulas for
prices, an analysis of the formulas, and
certification of the Governors’ vote; and
• Attachment 4—an application for
non–public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and supporting documents
under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GREP contract fits within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for GREP Contracts 1. The Postal Service
identifies customer-specific information
and general contract terms that
distinguish the instant contract from the
baseline GREP agreement. It states that
the instant contract differs from the
contract in Docket No. CP2010–36
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
a Functionally Equivalent Global Reseller
Expedited Package Negotiated Service Agreement
and Application For Non-Public Treatment of
Materials Filed Under Seal, January 14, 2011
(Notice).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jan 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
pertaining to customer-specific
information, e.g., customer’s name,
address, representative, signatory,
notice of postage changes and minimum
revenue. Id. at 4–5. The Postal Service
states that the differences, which
include price variations based on
updated costing information and
volume commitments, do not alter the
contract’s functional equivalency. Id. at
4. The Postal Service asserts that
‘‘[b]ecause the agreement incorporates
the same cost attributes and
methodology, the relevant
characteristics of this GREP contract are
similar, if not the same, as the relevant
characteristics of the contract filed in
Docket No. CP2010–36.’’ Id.
The Postal Service concludes that its
filing demonstrates that the new GREP
contract complies with the requirements
of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is functionally
equivalent to the baseline GREP
contract. It states that the differences do
not affect the services being offered or
the fundamental structure of the
contract. Therefore, it requests that the
instant contract be included within the
GREP Contracts 1 product. Id. at 6.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2011–58 for consideration of
matters related to the contract identified
in the Postal Service’s Notice.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s contract is consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or
3642. Comments are due no later than
January 24, 2011. The public portions of
this filing can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned
proceeding.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2011–58 for consideration of
matters raised by the Postal Service’s
Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in
this proceeding are due no later than
January 24, 2011.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as the
Officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4139
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1335 Filed 1–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
National Ocean Council; Development
of Strategic Action Plans for the
National Policy for the Stewardship of
the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great
Lakes
Notice of Intent To Prepare
Strategic Action Plans for the Nine
Priority Objectives for Implementation
of the National Policy for the
Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts,
and the Great Lakes. Request for
comments.
ACTION:
On July 19, 2010, President
Obama signed Executive Order 13547
establishing a National Policy for the
Stewardship of the Ocean, our Coasts,
and the Great Lakes (‘‘National Policy’’).
That Executive Order adopts the Final
Recommendations of the Interagency
Ocean Policy Task Force (‘‘Final
Recommendations’’) and directs Federal
agencies to take the appropriate steps to
implement them. The Executive Order
creates an interagency National Ocean
Council (NOC) to strengthen ocean
governance and coordination, identifies
nine priority actions for the NOC to
pursue, and adopts a flexible framework
for effective coastal and marine spatial
planning to address conservation,
economic activity, user conflict, and
sustainable use of the ocean, our coasts
and the Great Lakes.
Purpose: The NOC is announcing its
intent to prepare strategic action plans
for the nine priority objectives
identified in the Final
Recommendations and is requesting
input on the development of these
strategic action plans. (For general
information about the NOC and a copy
of Executive Order 13547 and the Final
Recommendations, please see: https://
www.WhiteHouse.gov/oceans). Public
comments will inform the preparation
of the strategic action plans. All
comments will be collated and posted
on the NOC Web site.
Public Comment: The NOC is seeking
public input as it develops the strategic
action plans for the priority objectives.
To be considered during the
development of the draft strategic action
plans, comments should be submitted
by April 29, 2011. Draft strategic action
plans will be released for public review
in the summer of 2011, allowing
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
4140
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2011 / Notices
additional opportunity for the public to
provide comments. Plans are expected
to be completed by the end of 2011.
In this public comment period, the
NOC is interested in comments that
address the opportunities, obstacles,
and metrics of progress relevant to each
of the priority objectives. Comments
should take into account that the
strategic action plans should address the
key areas identified in the Final
Recommendations, including, as
appropriate, the importance of
integrating local, regional, and national
efforts.
The NOC is requesting responses to
the following questions for each of the
priority objectives:
• What near-term, mid-term, and
long-term actions would most
effectively help the Nation achieve this
policy objective?
• What are some of the major
obstacles to achieving this objective; are
there opportunities this objective can
further, including transformative
changes in how we address the
stewardship of the oceans, coasts, and
Great Lakes?
• What milestones and performance
measures would be most useful for
measuring progress toward achieving
this priority objective?
Comments should be submitted
electronically at https://
www.WhiteHouse.gov/administration/
eop/oceans/comment or can be sent by
mail to: National Ocean Council, 722
Jackson Place, NW., Washington, DC
20503.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information regarding this
request can be found at https://
www.WhiteHouse.gov/oceans.
Questions about the content of this
request may be sent to https://
www.WhiteHouse.gov/administration/
eop/oceans/contact or by mail (please
allow additional time for processing) to
the address above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
19, 2010, President Obama signed
Executive Order 13547 establishing a
National Policy for the Stewardship of
the Ocean, our Coasts, and the Great
Lakes (‘‘National Policy’’). That
Executive Order adopts the Final
Recommendations of the Interagency
Ocean Policy Task Force and directs
Federal agencies to take the appropriate
steps to implement them. The Executive
Order creates an interagency National
Ocean Council (NOC) to strengthen
ocean governance and coordination,
identifies nine priority actions for the
NOC to pursue, and adopts a flexible
framework for effective coastal and
marine spatial planning to address
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jan 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
conservation, economic activity, user
conflict, and sustainable use of the
ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes.
The National Policy provides a
comprehensive approach, based on
science and technology, to uphold our
stewardship responsibilities and ensure
accountability for our actions to present
and future generations. The Obama
Administration intends, through the
National Policy, to provide a model of
balanced, productive, efficient,
sustainable, and informed ocean,
coastal, and Great Lakes use,
management, and conservation. The
Final Recommendations provide an
implementation strategy that describes a
clear set of priority objectives that our
Nation should pursue to further the
National Policy.
The nine priority objectives seek to
address some of the most pressing
challenges facing the ocean, our coasts,
and the Great Lakes. The nine priority
objectives are identified below.
Additional information about each
priority may be found at https://
www.WhiteHouse.gov/oceans.
Objective 1: Ecosystem-Based
Management: Adopt ecosystem-based
management as a foundational principle
for the comprehensive management of
the ocean, our coasts, and the Great
Lakes;
Objective 2: Coastal and Marine
Spatial Planning: Implement
comprehensive, integrated, ecosystembased coastal and marine spatial
planning and management in the United
States;
Objective 3: Inform Decisions and
Improve Understanding: Increase
knowledge to continually inform and
improve management and policy
decisions and the capacity to respond to
change and challenges. Better educate
the public through formal and informal
programs about the ocean, our coasts,
and the Great Lakes;
Objective 4: Coordinate and Support:
Better coordinate and support Federal,
State, Tribal, local, and regional
management of the ocean, our coasts,
and the Great Lakes. Improve
coordination and integration across the
Federal Government and, as
appropriate, engage with the
international community;
Objective 5: Resiliency and
Adaptation to Climate Change and
Ocean Acidification: Strengthen
resiliency of coastal communities and
marine and Great Lakes environments
and their abilities to adapt to climate
change impacts and ocean acidification;
Objective 6: Regional Ecosystem
Protection and Restoration: Establish
and implement an integrated ecosystem
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
protection and restoration strategy that
is science-based and aligns conservation
and restoration goals at the Federal,
State, Tribal, local, and regional levels;
Objective 7: Water Quality and
Sustainable Practices on Land: Enhance
water quality in the ocean, along our
coasts, and in the Great Lakes by
promoting and implementing
sustainable practices on land;
Objective 8: Changing Conditions in
the Arctic: Address environmental
stewardship needs in the Arctic Ocean
and adjacent coastal areas in the face of
climate-induced and other
environmental changes; and
Objective 9: Ocean, Coastal, and Great
Lakes Observations, Mapping, and
Infrastructure: Strengthen and integrate
Federal and non-Federal ocean
observing systems, sensors, data
collection platforms, data management,
and mapping capabilities into a national
system and integrate that system into
international observation efforts.
These priority objectives are meant to
provide a bridge between the National
Policy and action on the ground and in
the water, but they do not prescribe
specific actions or responsibilities. The
NOC is responsible for developing
strategic action plans to achieve the
priority objectives. As envisioned, the
plans will:
• Identify specific and measurable
near-term, mid-term, and long-term
actions, with appropriate milestones,
performance measures, and outcomes to
fulfill each objective;
• Consider smaller-scale,
incremental, and opportunistic efforts
that could build upon existing activities,
as well as more complex, larger-scale
actions that have the potential to be
truly transformative;
• Identify key lead and participating
agencies;
• Identify gaps and needs in science
and technology; and
• Identify potential resource
requirements and efficiencies; and steps
for integrating or coordinating current
and out-year budgets.
The plans will be adaptive to allow
for modification and addition of new
actions based on new information or
changing conditions. Their effective
implementation will also require clear
and easily understood requirements and
regulations, where appropriate, that
include enforcement as a critical
component. Implementation of the
National Policy for the stewardship of
the ocean, our coasts, and the Great
Lakes will recognize that different legal
regimes, with their associated freedoms,
rights, and duties, apply in different
maritime zones. The plans will be
implemented in a manner consistent
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 15 / Monday, January 24, 2011 / Notices
with applicable international
conventions and agreements and with
customary international law as reflected
in the Law of the Sea Convention. The
plans and their implementation will be
assessed and reviewed annually by the
NOC and modified as needed based on
the success or failure of the agreed upon
actions.
The NOC is committed to
transparency in developing strategic
action plans and implementing the
National Policy. As the NOC develops
and revises the plans, it will ensure
substantial opportunity for public
participation. The NOC will also
actively engage interested parties,
including, as appropriate, State, Tribal,
and local authorities, regional
governance structures, academic
institutions, nongovernmental
organizations, recreational interests, and
private enterprise.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff, OSTP.
[FR Doc. 2011–1316 Filed 1–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact:
The Office of the Secretary at (202)
551–5400.
Dated: January 20, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1513 Filed 1–20–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–63717; File No. SR–Phlx–
2010–145]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval to a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating to
the Establishment of Remote
Specialists
January 14, 2011.
I. Introduction
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold a Closed Meeting
on Thursday, January 27, 2011 at 2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii)
and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Casey, as duty officer,
voted to consider the items listed for the
Closed Meeting in a closed session.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
January 27, 2011 will be:
institution and settlement of injunctive
actions; institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings; and other
matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jan 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
On October 14, 2010, NASDAQ OMX
PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to allow certain Phlx exchange
members to act as option specialists that
are not physically present on the option
trading floor. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 2, 2010.3
On January 11, 2011, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.4 The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order
provides notice of filing of Amendment
No. 1 and grants accelerated approval to
the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend
Phlx Option Rules 501, 506, 507, 1014,
and 1020 to provide for remote
specialists under limited circumstances
and amend its Option Floor Procedure
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63192
(October 27, 2010), 75 FR 67427 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 On December 16, 2010, the Exchange extended
the period for Commission consideration of its
proposal to January 14, 2011. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(II) (concerning the ability of the selfregulatory organization that filed a proposed rule
change to extend the time period for Commission
consideration of its proposal).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4141
Advices 5 B–3 and E–1 to reflect the new
category of remote specialist.
Currently, Phlx has several types of
Registered Options Traders (‘‘ROTs’’) 6
that can register as market makers on
the Exchange, including specialists,
Streaming Quote Traders (‘‘SQTs’’),7 and
Remote Streaming Quote Traders
(‘‘RSQTs’’).8 Specialists are floor-based
Exchange members who are registered
as options specialists pursuant to Rule
1020(a). An SQT has a physical
presence on the options floor (though
they may be ‘‘in-crowd’’ or ‘‘out-ofcrowd’’) and is authorized to generate
and submit option quotations
electronically in options to which such
SQT is assigned, but may only do so
when he or she is physically present on
the floor of the Exchange. An RSQT, on
the other hand, has no physical trading
floor presence and instead is authorized
to generate and submit option
quotations electronically in options to
which such RSQT has been assigned.
The various market making
requirements applicable to each
category of market maker are set forth in
Rule 1014. Rules 500 through 599 (the
‘‘Allocation and Assignment Rules’’)
generally describe the process for
application and appointment of
specialists, SQTs and RSQTs, as well as
the allocation of classes of options to
them.9
Accordingly, while Phlx’s rules
provide for remote market-making ROTs
(i.e., RSQTs), they do not provide for
remote specialists. Rather, Phlx’s rules
currently require that each options class
and series listed on the Exchange have
a specialist physically present on the
5 Phlx’s Options Floor Procedure Advices
(‘‘OFPAs’’ or ‘‘Advices’’) are part of the Exchange’s
minor rule plan (‘‘MRP’’ or ‘‘Minor Rule Plan’’),
which consists of Advices with preset fines,
pursuant to Rule 19d–1(c) under the Act (17 CFR
240.19d–1(c)). See e.g., Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 50997 (January 7, 2005), 70 FR 2444
(January 13, 2005) (SR–Phlx–2003–40) (order
approving the Exchange’s Options Floor Broker
Management System). As this time, Phlx is not
proposing to change any of the fines that are
applicable under any of the Advices.
6 A ROT is a member who has received
permission from the Exchange to trade in options
for his own account. Phlx also has Directed SQTs
and Directed RSQTs, which receive Directed Orders
as defined in Rule 1080(l)(i)(A). Specialists may
likewise receive Directed Orders. Further, Phlx
rules also provide for non-streaming ROTs (‘‘nonSQT ROT’’), which can make markets in certain
options on an issue-by-issue basis. See Rule
1014(b)(ii)(C).
7 See Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
8 See Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B).
9 The Allocation and Assignment Rules also
indicate under what circumstances new allocations
may not be made. See, e.g., Supplementary Material
.01 to Rule 506.
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4139-4141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1316]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
National Ocean Council; Development of Strategic Action Plans for
the National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and
the Great Lakes
ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare Strategic Action Plans for the Nine
Priority Objectives for Implementation of the National Policy for the
Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes. Request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 19, 2010, President Obama signed Executive Order 13547
establishing a National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, our
Coasts, and the Great Lakes (``National Policy''). That Executive Order
adopts the Final Recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task
Force (``Final Recommendations'') and directs Federal agencies to take
the appropriate steps to implement them. The Executive Order creates an
interagency National Ocean Council (NOC) to strengthen ocean governance
and coordination, identifies nine priority actions for the NOC to
pursue, and adopts a flexible framework for effective coastal and
marine spatial planning to address conservation, economic activity,
user conflict, and sustainable use of the ocean, our coasts and the
Great Lakes.
Purpose: The NOC is announcing its intent to prepare strategic
action plans for the nine priority objectives identified in the Final
Recommendations and is requesting input on the development of these
strategic action plans. (For general information about the NOC and a
copy of Executive Order 13547 and the Final Recommendations, please
see: https://www.WhiteHouse.gov/oceans). Public comments will inform the
preparation of the strategic action plans. All comments will be
collated and posted on the NOC Web site.
Public Comment: The NOC is seeking public input as it develops the
strategic action plans for the priority objectives. To be considered
during the development of the draft strategic action plans, comments
should be submitted by April 29, 2011. Draft strategic action plans
will be released for public review in the summer of 2011, allowing
[[Page 4140]]
additional opportunity for the public to provide comments. Plans are
expected to be completed by the end of 2011.
In this public comment period, the NOC is interested in comments
that address the opportunities, obstacles, and metrics of progress
relevant to each of the priority objectives. Comments should take into
account that the strategic action plans should address the key areas
identified in the Final Recommendations, including, as appropriate, the
importance of integrating local, regional, and national efforts.
The NOC is requesting responses to the following questions for each
of the priority objectives:
What near-term, mid-term, and long-term actions would most
effectively help the Nation achieve this policy objective?
What are some of the major obstacles to achieving this
objective; are there opportunities this objective can further,
including transformative changes in how we address the stewardship of
the oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes?
What milestones and performance measures would be most
useful for measuring progress toward achieving this priority objective?
Comments should be submitted electronically at https://www.WhiteHouse.gov/administration/eop/oceans/comment or can be sent by
mail to: National Ocean Council, 722 Jackson Place, NW., Washington, DC
20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information regarding this
request can be found at https://www.WhiteHouse.gov/oceans. Questions
about the content of this request may be sent to https://www.WhiteHouse.gov/administration/eop/oceans/contact or by mail (please
allow additional time for processing) to the address above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 19, 2010, President Obama signed
Executive Order 13547 establishing a National Policy for the
Stewardship of the Ocean, our Coasts, and the Great Lakes (``National
Policy''). That Executive Order adopts the Final Recommendations of the
Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force and directs Federal agencies to
take the appropriate steps to implement them. The Executive Order
creates an interagency National Ocean Council (NOC) to strengthen ocean
governance and coordination, identifies nine priority actions for the
NOC to pursue, and adopts a flexible framework for effective coastal
and marine spatial planning to address conservation, economic activity,
user conflict, and sustainable use of the ocean, our coasts, and the
Great Lakes.
The National Policy provides a comprehensive approach, based on
science and technology, to uphold our stewardship responsibilities and
ensure accountability for our actions to present and future
generations. The Obama Administration intends, through the National
Policy, to provide a model of balanced, productive, efficient,
sustainable, and informed ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes use,
management, and conservation. The Final Recommendations provide an
implementation strategy that describes a clear set of priority
objectives that our Nation should pursue to further the National
Policy.
The nine priority objectives seek to address some of the most
pressing challenges facing the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes.
The nine priority objectives are identified below. Additional
information about each priority may be found at https://www.WhiteHouse.gov/oceans.
Objective 1: Ecosystem-Based Management: Adopt ecosystem-based
management as a foundational principle for the comprehensive management
of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes;
Objective 2: Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning: Implement
comprehensive, integrated, ecosystem-based coastal and marine spatial
planning and management in the United States;
Objective 3: Inform Decisions and Improve Understanding: Increase
knowledge to continually inform and improve management and policy
decisions and the capacity to respond to change and challenges. Better
educate the public through formal and informal programs about the
ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes;
Objective 4: Coordinate and Support: Better coordinate and support
Federal, State, Tribal, local, and regional management of the ocean,
our coasts, and the Great Lakes. Improve coordination and integration
across the Federal Government and, as appropriate, engage with the
international community;
Objective 5: Resiliency and Adaptation to Climate Change and Ocean
Acidification: Strengthen resiliency of coastal communities and marine
and Great Lakes environments and their abilities to adapt to climate
change impacts and ocean acidification;
Objective 6: Regional Ecosystem Protection and Restoration:
Establish and implement an integrated ecosystem protection and
restoration strategy that is science-based and aligns conservation and
restoration goals at the Federal, State, Tribal, local, and regional
levels;
Objective 7: Water Quality and Sustainable Practices on Land:
Enhance water quality in the ocean, along our coasts, and in the Great
Lakes by promoting and implementing sustainable practices on land;
Objective 8: Changing Conditions in the Arctic: Address
environmental stewardship needs in the Arctic Ocean and adjacent
coastal areas in the face of climate-induced and other environmental
changes; and
Objective 9: Ocean, Coastal, and Great Lakes Observations, Mapping,
and Infrastructure: Strengthen and integrate Federal and non-Federal
ocean observing systems, sensors, data collection platforms, data
management, and mapping capabilities into a national system and
integrate that system into international observation efforts.
These priority objectives are meant to provide a bridge between the
National Policy and action on the ground and in the water, but they do
not prescribe specific actions or responsibilities. The NOC is
responsible for developing strategic action plans to achieve the
priority objectives. As envisioned, the plans will:
Identify specific and measurable near-term, mid-term, and
long-term actions, with appropriate milestones, performance measures,
and outcomes to fulfill each objective;
Consider smaller-scale, incremental, and opportunistic
efforts that could build upon existing activities, as well as more
complex, larger-scale actions that have the potential to be truly
transformative;
Identify key lead and participating agencies;
Identify gaps and needs in science and technology; and
Identify potential resource requirements and efficiencies;
and steps for integrating or coordinating current and out-year budgets.
The plans will be adaptive to allow for modification and addition
of new actions based on new information or changing conditions. Their
effective implementation will also require clear and easily understood
requirements and regulations, where appropriate, that include
enforcement as a critical component. Implementation of the National
Policy for the stewardship of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great
Lakes will recognize that different legal regimes, with their
associated freedoms, rights, and duties, apply in different maritime
zones. The plans will be implemented in a manner consistent
[[Page 4141]]
with applicable international conventions and agreements and with
customary international law as reflected in the Law of the Sea
Convention. The plans and their implementation will be assessed and
reviewed annually by the NOC and modified as needed based on the
success or failure of the agreed upon actions.
The NOC is committed to transparency in developing strategic action
plans and implementing the National Policy. As the NOC develops and
revises the plans, it will ensure substantial opportunity for public
participation. The NOC will also actively engage interested parties,
including, as appropriate, State, Tribal, and local authorities,
regional governance structures, academic institutions, nongovernmental
organizations, recreational interests, and private enterprise.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff, OSTP.
[FR Doc. 2011-1316 Filed 1-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P