Ameren Missouri; Combined License Application for Callaway Plant Unit 2; Exemption, 3927-3929 [2011-1263]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices
Dated: December 13, 2010.
Victor M. Fortuno,
President and General Counsel, Legal Services
Corporation.
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting the electronic submissions
of responses.
[FR Doc. 2010–32294 Filed 1–20–11; 9:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Alice Whelihan, National
Endowment for the Arts, 1100
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 726,
Washington, DC 20506–0001, telephone
(202) 682–5574 (this is not a toll-free
number), fax (202) 682–5603.
ADDRESSES:
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts;
Proposed Collection: Comment
Request
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2011–1167 Filed 1–20–11; 8:45 am]
Notice.
The National Endowment for
the Arts, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing collections
of information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This
program helps ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
National Endowment for the Arts, on
behalf of the Federal Council on the
Arts and the Humanities, is soliciting
comments concerning renewal of the
Application for Domestic Indemnity. A
copy of this collection request can be
obtained by contacting the office listed
below in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section below on or before
April 1, 2011. The National Endowment
for the Arts is particularly interested in
comments which:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
SUMMARY:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Kathleen Edwards,
Director, Administrative Services.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52–037; NRC–2008–0556]
Ameren Missouri; Combined License
Application for Callaway Plant Unit 2;
Exemption
1.0
Background
Union Electric Company, doing
business as Ameren UE, submitted to
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) a Combined License
(COL) Application for a single unit of
AREVA NP’s U.S. EPR in accordance
with the requirements of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
subpart C of part 52, ‘‘Licenses,
Certifications, and Approvals for
Nuclear Power Plants.’’ This reactor is to
be identified as Callaway Plant
(Callaway), Unit 2, and located at the
current Callaway County, Missouri site
of the Callaway Power Plant. The
Callaway, Unit 2, COL application is
based upon and linked to the U.S. EPR
reference COL (RCOL) application for
UniStar’s Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power
Plant, Unit 3 (CCNPP3). The NRC
docketed the Callaway, Unit 2, COL
application on December 12, 2008. In its
letter to the NRC dated April 28, 2009,
Ameren informed that it was
suspending its efforts to build a nuclear
power plant in Missouri. Subsequently,
by letter dated June 23, 2009, Ameren
requested the NRC to suspend all review
activities relating to the Callaway, Unit
2, COL application. The NRC informed
Ameren by letter dated June 29, 2009,
that it had suspended all review
activities relating to the Callaway, Unit
2, COL application. The NRC is
currently performing a detailed review
of the CCNPP3 RCOL application, as
well as AREVA NP’s application for
design certification of the U.S. EPR.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2.0
3927
Request/Action
The regulations specified in 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) require that an applicant
for a combined license under 10 CFR
part 52 shall, during the period from
docketing of a COL application until the
Commission makes a finding under 10
CFR 52.103(g) pertaining to facility
operation, submit an annual update to
the application’s Final Safety Analysis
Report (FSAR), which is a part of the
application.
On February 25, 2009, Ameren
submitted Revision 1 to the COL
application, including updates to the
FSAR. Pursuant to 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii), the next annual update
would be due in December 2010. Union
Electric Company, doing business as
Ameren Missouri (Ameren) as of
October 1, 2010, as noted in its letter to
the NRC dated October 26, 2010, has
requested a one-time exemption from
the 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) requirements
to submit the scheduled 2010 and 2011
COL application FSAR updates, and
proposed for approval of a new
submittal deadline of December 31,
2012, for the next FSAR update.
In summary, the requested exemption
is a one-time schedule change from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii).
The exemption would allow Ameren to
submit the next FSAR update at a later
date, but still in advance of NRC’s
reinstating its review of the application
and in any event, by December 31, 2012.
The current FSAR update schedule
could not be changed, absent the
exemption. Ameren requested the
exemption by letter dated October 26,
2010 (Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession Number ML103090556).
3.0
Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC
may, upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR Part 50, including Section
50.71(e)(3)(iii) when: (1) the exemptions
are authorized by law, will not present
an undue risk to public health or safety,
and are consistent with the common
defense and security; and (2) special
circumstances are present. As relevant
to the requested exemption, special
circumstances exist if: (1) ‘‘Application
of the regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the
underlying purpose of the rule or is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule’’ (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); (2) ‘‘Compliance would
result in undue hardship or other costs
that are significantly in excess of those
contemplated when the regulation was
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
3928
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices
adopted, or that are significantly in
excess of those incurred by others
similarly situated’’ (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(iii)); or (3) ‘‘The exemption
would provide only temporary relief
from the applicable regulation and the
licensee has made good faith efforts to
comply with the regulation’’ (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(v)).
The review of the Callaway, Unit 2,
COL application FSAR has been
suspended since June 29, 2009. Since
the COL application FSAR is directly
linked to the CCNPP3 RCOL
application, many changes in the RCOL
application require an associated change
to the COL application FSAR and,
because the NRC review of the COL
application is suspended, the updates to
the FSAR will not be reviewed by the
NRC staff until the Callaway, Unit 2,
COL application review is resumed.
Thus, the optimum time to prepare a
revision to the COL application FSAR is
sometime prior to Ameren requesting
the NRC to resume its review. To
prepare and submit a COL application
FSAR update when the review remains
suspended and in the absence of any
decision by Ameren to request the NRC
to resume the review would require
Ameren to spend significant time and
effort and would be of no value,
particularly due to the fact that the
RCOL application and the U.S. EPR
FSAR are still undergoing periodic
revisions and updates. Furthermore, the
adjudicatory proceedings related to the
Callaway, Unit 2, COL application were
terminated by the Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board (ASLB) after
agreements were made between
Ameren, the NRC, and the petitioners
for intervention, as documented in
‘‘AMERENUE (Callaway Plant Unit 2)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
(Approving Settlement Agreement and
Terminating Contested Adjudicatory
Proceeding) LBP–09–23 (August 28,
2009)’’ (ML092400189). Ameren
commits to submit the next FSAR
update prior to any request to the NRC
to resume review of the COL application
and, in any event, by December 31,
2012. Ameren would need to identify all
committed changes to the RCOL
application since the last revisions to
the RCOL application and the U.S. EPR
FSAR in order to prepare a COL
application FSAR revision that
accurately and completely reflects the
committed changes to the RCOL
application as well as the U.S. EPR
FSAR.
The requested one-time exemption to
defer submittal of the next update to the
Callaway, Unit 2, COL application
FSAR would provide only temporary
relief from the regulations of 10 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
50.71(e)(3)(iii). Ameren has made good
faith efforts to comply with 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) by submitting Revision 1
to the COL application dated February
25, 2009, prior to requesting the review
suspension. Revision 1 incorporated
information provided in prior
supplements and standardized language
with the RCOL application.
Authorized by Law:
The exemption is a one-time schedule
exemption from the requirements of 10
CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption
would allow Ameren to submit the next
Callaway Unit 2 COL application FSAR
update on or before December 31, 2012,
in lieu of the required scheduled
submittals in December 2010, and
December 2011. As stated above, 10 CFR
50.12 allows the NRC to grant
exemptions. The NRC staff has
determined that granting Ameren the
requested one-time exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
will provide only temporary relief from
this regulation and will not result in a
violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the NRC’s
regulations. Therefore, the exemption is
authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and
Safety:
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for a timely
and comprehensive update of the FSAR
associated with a COL application in
order to support an effective and
efficient review by the NRC staff and
issuance of the NRC staff’s safety
evaluation report. The requested
exemption is solely administrative in
nature, in that it pertains to the
schedule for submittal to the NRC of
revisions to an application under 10
CFR part 52, for which a license has not
been granted. In addition, since the
review of the application has been
suspended, any update to the
application submitted by Ameren will
not be reviewed by the NRC at this time.
Based on the nature of the requested
exemption as described above, no new
accident precursors are created by the
exemption; thus, neither the probability
nor the consequences of postulated
accidents are increased. Therefore, there
is no undue risk to public health and
safety.
Consistent with Common Defense and
Security:
The requested exemption would
allow Ameren to submit the next FSAR
update prior to requesting the NRC to
resume the review and, in any event, on
or before December 31, 2012. This
schedule change has no relation to
security issues. Therefore, the common
defense and security is not impacted by
this exemption.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Special Circumstances:
Special circumstances, in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are present
whenever: (1) ‘‘Application of the
regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the
underlying purpose of the rule or is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule’’ (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); (2) ‘‘Compliance would
result in undue hardship or other costs
that are significantly in excess of those
contemplated when the regulation was
adopted, or that are significantly in
excess of those incurred by others
similarly situated’’ (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(iii)); or (3) ‘‘The exemption
would provide only temporary relief
from the applicable regulation and the
licensee has made good faith efforts to
comply with the regulation’’ (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(v)).
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for a timely
and comprehensive update of the FSAR
associated with a COL application in
order to support an effective and
efficient review by the NRC staff and
issuance of the NRC staff’s safety
evaluation report. As discussed above,
the requested one-time exemption is
solely administrative in nature, in that
it pertains to a one-time schedule
change for submittal of revisions to an
application under 10 CFR Part 52, for
which a license has not been granted.
The requested one-time exemption will
permit Ameren time to carefully review
the most recent revisions of the CCNPP3
RCOL application as well as the U.S.
EPR FSAR, and fully incorporate these
revisions into a comprehensive update
of the Callaway, Unit 2, FSAR
associated with the COL application.
This one-time exemption will support
the NRC staff’s effective and efficient
review of the COL application when
resumed, as well as issuance of the
safety evaluation report, and therefore
does not affect the underlying purpose
of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). Under the
circumstances that Ameren has
suspended its pursuit of the COL, the
NRC has suspended its review of the
application, and the adjudicatory
proceedings have been terminated by
ASLB, application of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) would result in Ameren
spending significant time and effort in
incorporating changes made to the
RCOL application into the Callaway,
Unit 2, COL application, but not achieve
the underlying purpose of that rule;
granting a one-time exemption from 10
CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would provide only
temporary relief; and Ameren has made
good faith efforts to comply with the
regulation; therefore, the special
circumstances required by 10 CFR
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices
50.12(a)(2) for the granting of an
exemption from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
exist.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
exemption is authorized by law, will not
present an undue risk to the public
health and safety, and is consistent with
the common defense and security. Also,
special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the NRC hereby grants
Ameren a one-time exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
pertaining to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL
application to allow submittal of the
next FSAR update prior to any request
to the NRC to resume the review and,
in any event, no later than December 31,
2012.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the NRC
has determined that the granting of this
exemption will not have a significant
effect on the quality of the human
environment (76 FR 800).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of January 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, EPR Projects Branch, Division of New
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2011–1263 Filed 1–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
call (recording)—(301) 415–1292.
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, (301) 415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify Angela
Bolduc, Chief, Employee/Labor
Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301–
492–2230, TDD: 301–415–2100, or by email at angela.bolduc@nrc.gov.
mailto:dlc@nrc.gov. mailto:aks@nrc.gov
Determinations on requests for
reasonable accommodation will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
This notice is distributed
electronically to subscribers. If you no
longer wish to receive it, or would like
to be added to the distribution, please
contact the Office of the Secretary,
Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969),
or send an e-mail to
darlene.wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: January 14, 2011.
Richard J. Laufer,
Technical Coordinator, Office of the
Secretary.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2011–1331 Filed 1–19–11; 4:15 pm]
[NRC–2011–0006]
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission.
Week of January 24, 2011.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED:
DATE:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Week of January 24, 2011
Monday, January 24, 2011
12:55 p.m. Affirmation Session
(Public Meeting) (Tentative)
Request by Petitioners for a
Suspension of Renewal Proceedings
Pending Completion of Rulemaking in
Docket No. PRM–54–6. (Tentative)
This meeting will be Webcast live at
the Web address—https://www.nrc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
* The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
13:45 Jan 20, 2011
understandings concerning executive
compensation that is based on or
otherwise relates to the acquisition,
merger, consolidation, sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of
the assets of an issuer, and requires
enhanced disclosure of these golden
parachute arrangements.
Item 2: The Commission will consider
whether to propose rule amendments
that would implement Section 413(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act regarding the
definition of ‘‘accredited investor.’’
Item 3: The Commission will consider
whether to propose a rule under the
Advisers Act establishing reporting
obligations for advisers to private funds
to implement the requirements of
Sections 404 and 406 of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact:
The Office of the Secretary at (202)
551–5400.
Dated: January 18, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–1295 Filed 1–19–11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[Release No. 34–63721; File No. SR–CBOE–
2011–001]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to PULSe Fees
Sunshine Act Notice
VerDate Mar<15>2010
3929
Jkt 223001
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold an Open Meeting
on January 25, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., in the
Auditorium, Room L–002.
The subject matter of the Open
Meeting will be:
Item 1: The Commission will consider
whether to adopt rules to implement
Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act, which requires shareholder
advisory votes to approve the
compensation of executives, or say-onpay votes, and the frequency of
shareholder say-on-pay votes. Section
951 also requires shareholder advisory
votes to approve certain agreements and
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
January 14, 2011.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 3,
2011, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by CBOE. The Exchange has designated
this proposal as one establishing or
changing a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by CBOE under Section
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3927-3929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1263]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52-037; NRC-2008-0556]
Ameren Missouri; Combined License Application for Callaway Plant
Unit 2; Exemption
1.0 Background
Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren UE, submitted to
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) a Combined License (COL)
Application for a single unit of AREVA NP's U.S. EPR in accordance with
the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), subpart C of part 52, ``Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals
for Nuclear Power Plants.'' This reactor is to be identified as
Callaway Plant (Callaway), Unit 2, and located at the current Callaway
County, Missouri site of the Callaway Power Plant. The Callaway, Unit
2, COL application is based upon and linked to the U.S. EPR reference
COL (RCOL) application for UniStar's Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power
Plant, Unit 3 (CCNPP3). The NRC docketed the Callaway, Unit 2, COL
application on December 12, 2008. In its letter to the NRC dated April
28, 2009, Ameren informed that it was suspending its efforts to build a
nuclear power plant in Missouri. Subsequently, by letter dated June 23,
2009, Ameren requested the NRC to suspend all review activities
relating to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application. The NRC informed
Ameren by letter dated June 29, 2009, that it had suspended all review
activities relating to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application. The NRC
is currently performing a detailed review of the CCNPP3 RCOL
application, as well as AREVA NP's application for design certification
of the U.S. EPR.
2.0 Request/Action
The regulations specified in 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) require that
an applicant for a combined license under 10 CFR part 52 shall, during
the period from docketing of a COL application until the Commission
makes a finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g) pertaining to facility
operation, submit an annual update to the application's Final Safety
Analysis Report (FSAR), which is a part of the application.
On February 25, 2009, Ameren submitted Revision 1 to the COL
application, including updates to the FSAR. Pursuant to 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii), the next annual update would be due in December 2010.
Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren Missouri (Ameren) as
of October 1, 2010, as noted in its letter to the NRC dated October 26,
2010, has requested a one-time exemption from the 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) requirements to submit the scheduled 2010 and 2011 COL
application FSAR updates, and proposed for approval of a new submittal
deadline of December 31, 2012, for the next FSAR update.
In summary, the requested exemption is a one-time schedule change
from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption would
allow Ameren to submit the next FSAR update at a later date, but still
in advance of NRC's reinstating its review of the application and in
any event, by December 31, 2012. The current FSAR update schedule could
not be changed, absent the exemption. Ameren requested the exemption by
letter dated October 26, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Accession Number ML103090556).
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC may, upon application by any
interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, including Section 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
when: (1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an
undue risk to public health or safety, and are consistent with the
common defense and security; and (2) special circumstances are present.
As relevant to the requested exemption, special circumstances exist if:
(1) ``Application of the regulation in the particular circumstances
would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary
to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule'' (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); (2) ``Compliance would result in undue hardship or
other costs that are significantly in excess of those contemplated when
the regulation was
[[Page 3928]]
adopted, or that are significantly in excess of those incurred by
others similarly situated'' (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii)); or (3) ``The
exemption would provide only temporary relief from the applicable
regulation and the licensee has made good faith efforts to comply with
the regulation'' (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)).
The review of the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application FSAR has been
suspended since June 29, 2009. Since the COL application FSAR is
directly linked to the CCNPP3 RCOL application, many changes in the
RCOL application require an associated change to the COL application
FSAR and, because the NRC review of the COL application is suspended,
the updates to the FSAR will not be reviewed by the NRC staff until the
Callaway, Unit 2, COL application review is resumed. Thus, the optimum
time to prepare a revision to the COL application FSAR is sometime
prior to Ameren requesting the NRC to resume its review. To prepare and
submit a COL application FSAR update when the review remains suspended
and in the absence of any decision by Ameren to request the NRC to
resume the review would require Ameren to spend significant time and
effort and would be of no value, particularly due to the fact that the
RCOL application and the U.S. EPR FSAR are still undergoing periodic
revisions and updates. Furthermore, the adjudicatory proceedings
related to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application were terminated by the
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) after agreements were made
between Ameren, the NRC, and the petitioners for intervention, as
documented in ``AMERENUE (Callaway Plant Unit 2) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
(Approving Settlement Agreement and Terminating Contested Adjudicatory
Proceeding) LBP-09-23 (August 28, 2009)'' (ML092400189). Ameren commits
to submit the next FSAR update prior to any request to the NRC to
resume review of the COL application and, in any event, by December 31,
2012. Ameren would need to identify all committed changes to the RCOL
application since the last revisions to the RCOL application and the
U.S. EPR FSAR in order to prepare a COL application FSAR revision that
accurately and completely reflects the committed changes to the RCOL
application as well as the U.S. EPR FSAR.
The requested one-time exemption to defer submittal of the next
update to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application FSAR would provide only
temporary relief from the regulations of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii).
Ameren has made good faith efforts to comply with 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) by submitting Revision 1 to the COL application dated
February 25, 2009, prior to requesting the review suspension. Revision
1 incorporated information provided in prior supplements and
standardized language with the RCOL application.
Authorized by Law:
The exemption is a one-time schedule exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption would allow
Ameren to submit the next Callaway Unit 2 COL application FSAR update
on or before December 31, 2012, in lieu of the required scheduled
submittals in December 2010, and December 2011. As stated above, 10 CFR
50.12 allows the NRC to grant exemptions. The NRC staff has determined
that granting Ameren the requested one-time exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) will provide only temporary
relief from this regulation and will not result in a violation of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the NRC's regulations.
Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety:
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for
a timely and comprehensive update of the FSAR associated with a COL
application in order to support an effective and efficient review by
the NRC staff and issuance of the NRC staff's safety evaluation report.
The requested exemption is solely administrative in nature, in that it
pertains to the schedule for submittal to the NRC of revisions to an
application under 10 CFR part 52, for which a license has not been
granted. In addition, since the review of the application has been
suspended, any update to the application submitted by Ameren will not
be reviewed by the NRC at this time.
Based on the nature of the requested exemption as described above,
no new accident precursors are created by the exemption; thus, neither
the probability nor the consequences of postulated accidents are
increased. Therefore, there is no undue risk to public health and
safety.
Consistent with Common Defense and Security:
The requested exemption would allow Ameren to submit the next FSAR
update prior to requesting the NRC to resume the review and, in any
event, on or before December 31, 2012. This schedule change has no
relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and security
is not impacted by this exemption.
Special Circumstances:
Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are
present whenever: (1) ``Application of the regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is
not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule'' (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); (2) ``Compliance would result in undue hardship or
other costs that are significantly in excess of those contemplated when
the regulation was adopted, or that are significantly in excess of
those incurred by others similarly situated'' (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(iii)); or (3) ``The exemption would provide only temporary
relief from the applicable regulation and the licensee has made good
faith efforts to comply with the regulation'' (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)).
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for
a timely and comprehensive update of the FSAR associated with a COL
application in order to support an effective and efficient review by
the NRC staff and issuance of the NRC staff's safety evaluation report.
As discussed above, the requested one-time exemption is solely
administrative in nature, in that it pertains to a one-time schedule
change for submittal of revisions to an application under 10 CFR Part
52, for which a license has not been granted. The requested one-time
exemption will permit Ameren time to carefully review the most recent
revisions of the CCNPP3 RCOL application as well as the U.S. EPR FSAR,
and fully incorporate these revisions into a comprehensive update of
the Callaway, Unit 2, FSAR associated with the COL application. This
one-time exemption will support the NRC staff's effective and efficient
review of the COL application when resumed, as well as issuance of the
safety evaluation report, and therefore does not affect the underlying
purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). Under the circumstances that Ameren
has suspended its pursuit of the COL, the NRC has suspended its review
of the application, and the adjudicatory proceedings have been
terminated by ASLB, application of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would result
in Ameren spending significant time and effort in incorporating changes
made to the RCOL application into the Callaway, Unit 2, COL
application, but not achieve the underlying purpose of that rule;
granting a one-time exemption from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would
provide only temporary relief; and Ameren has made good faith efforts
to comply with the regulation; therefore, the special circumstances
required by 10 CFR
[[Page 3929]]
50.12(a)(2) for the granting of an exemption from 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) exist.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12,
the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special circumstances are present. Therefore, the
NRC hereby grants Ameren a one-time exemption from the requirements of
10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) pertaining to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL
application to allow submittal of the next FSAR update prior to any
request to the NRC to resume the review and, in any event, no later
than December 31, 2012.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the NRC has determined that the granting
of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of
the human environment (76 FR 800).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of January 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, EPR Projects Branch, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office
of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2011-1263 Filed 1-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P