Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability, 3884 [2011-1259]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
3884
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 14 / Friday, January 21, 2011 / Notices
increasing fish populations, and
increasing commercial and recreational
catch rates; [c] to understand how such
values depend on the current baseline
level of fish populations and fish losses,
the scope of the change in those
measures, and the certainty level of the
predictions; and [d] to understand how
such values vary with respect to
individuals’ economic and demographic
characteristics.
The key elicitation questions ask
respondents whether or not they would
vote for policies that would increase
their cost of living, in exchange for
specified multi-attribute changes in [a]
impingement and entrainment losses of
fish, [b] commercial fish populations, [c]
long-term populations of all fish, and [d]
condition of aquatic ecosystems. The
respondents’ stated preferences with
respect to levels of environmental goods
and cost to households, when used in
conjunction with other information
collected in the survey on the use of the
affected aquatic resources, household
income, and other demographics, can be
analyzed statistically (using a mixed
logit framework) to estimate total WTP
for the quantified environmental
benefits of the 316(b) rulemaking. Data
analysis and interpretation is grounded
in a standard random utility model.
The welfare values that can be
derived from this stated preference
survey along with those that are
estimated apart from the survey effort
will offer insight into the composition of
the value people place on the 316(b)
environmental impacts. WTP estimates
derived from the survey may overlap—
to a potentially substantial extent—with
estimates that can be provided through
some other methods. Therefore,
particular care will be given to avoid
any possible double counting of values
that might be derived from alternative
valuation methods.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 5 minutes per
telephone screening participant and 30
minutes per mail survey respondent
including the time necessary to
complete and mail back the
questionnaire. Burden means the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install,
and utilize technology and systems for
the purposes of collecting, validating,
and verifying information, processing
and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
any previously applicable instructions
and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel
to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Respondents: Individuals from U.S.
households.
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 9,533 for telephone
screening and 2,288 for mailed
questionnaires.
Frequency of response: One-time
response.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: Onetime response.
Estimated total burden hours: 1,938
hours.
Estimated total costs: $39,583. EPA
estimates that there will be no capital
and operating and maintenance cost
burden to respondents.
Dated: January 14, 2011.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–1257 Filed 1–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–8994–8]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–1399 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly Receipt of Environmental
Impact Statements Filed 01/10/2011
Through 01/14/2011 Pursuant to 40 CFR
1506.9
Notice: In accordance with Section
309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is
required to make its comments on EISs
issued by other Federal agencies public.
Historically, EPA met this mandate by
publishing weekly notices of availability
of EPA comments, which includes a
brief summary of EPA’s comment
letters, in the Federal Register. Since
February 2008, EPA has included its
comment letters on EISs on its Web site
at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
nepa/eisdata.html. Including the entire
EIS comment letters on the Web site
satisfies the Section 309(a) requirement
to make EPA’s comments on EISs
available to the public. Accordingly, on
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
March 31, 2010, EPA discontinued the
publication of the notice of availability
of EPA comments in the Federal
Register.
EIS No. 20110011, Final EIS, FHWA,
NC, Gaston East-West Connector
Project, Construction (from I–85 west
Gastonia to I–485/NC 160 near the
Charlotte-Douglas International
Airport, Gaston and Meckleburg
Counties, NC, Wait Period Ends: 02/
22/2011, Contact: Jennifer Harris,
919–571–3004.
EIS No. 20110012, Final EIS, NRC, AZ,
GENERIC EIS—License Renewal of
Nuclear Plants, Regarding Palo Verde
Nuclear Generating Station,
Supplement 43, NUREG–1437,
Maricopa County, AZ, Wait Period
Ends: 02/22/2011, Contact: David
Drucker, 301–415–6223.
EIS No. 20110013, Final EIS, NPS, VA,
Cedar Creek and Belle Grove National
Historical Park, General Management
Plan, Implementation, Frederick,
Shenandoah, Warren Counties, VA,
Wait Period Ends: 02/22/2011,
Contact: Peter Iris-Williams, 215–597–
6479.
EIS No. 20110014, Draft EIS, USFS, ID,
Forest Plan Amendments Proposed to
Facilitate Implementation of the 2011
Plan-Scale Wildlife Conservation
Strategy Phase 1: Forested Biological
Community, Payette National Forest,
Adam, Idaho, Valley and Washington
Counties, ID, Comment Period Ends:
04/20/2011, Contact: Sue Dixon, 208–
634–0700.
EIS No. 20110015, Draft EIS, USFWS,
WA, Willapa National Wildlife Refuge
Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan, Implementation, Pacific County,
WA, Comment Period Ends: 03/07/
2011, Contact: Charles Houghten,
503–231–6207.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20110009, Draft EIS, GSA, DC,
Nebraska Avenue Complex Master
Plan, Propose to Consolidate Over
28,000 DHS Employees, Location
3801 Nebraska Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, Comment Period
Ends: 03/01/2011, Contact: Suzanne
Hill, 202–205–5821. Revision to FR
Notice 01/14/2011. Correction to the
Status from Final EIS to Draft EIS.
Dated: January 18, 2011.
Cliff Rader,
Environmental Protection Specialist, NEPA
Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2011–1259 Filed 1–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 3884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-8994-8]
Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information (202) 564-1399 or https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly Receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 01/10/2011
Through 01/14/2011 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9
Notice: In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA
is required to make its comments on EISs issued by other Federal
agencies public. Historically, EPA met this mandate by publishing
weekly notices of availability of EPA comments, which includes a brief
summary of EPA's comment letters, in the Federal Register. Since
February 2008, EPA has included its comment letters on EISs on its Web
site at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. Including the
entire EIS comment letters on the Web site satisfies the Section 309(a)
requirement to make EPA's comments on EISs available to the public.
Accordingly, on March 31, 2010, EPA discontinued the publication of the
notice of availability of EPA comments in the Federal Register.
EIS No. 20110011, Final EIS, FHWA, NC, Gaston East-West Connector
Project, Construction (from I-85 west Gastonia to I-485/NC 160 near the
Charlotte-Douglas International Airport, Gaston and Meckleburg
Counties, NC, Wait Period Ends: 02/22/2011, Contact: Jennifer Harris,
919-571-3004.
EIS No. 20110012, Final EIS, NRC, AZ, GENERIC EIS--License Renewal of
Nuclear Plants, Regarding Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station,
Supplement 43, NUREG-1437, Maricopa County, AZ, Wait Period Ends: 02/
22/2011, Contact: David Drucker, 301-415-6223.
EIS No. 20110013, Final EIS, NPS, VA, Cedar Creek and Belle Grove
National Historical Park, General Management Plan, Implementation,
Frederick, Shenandoah, Warren Counties, VA, Wait Period Ends: 02/22/
2011, Contact: Peter Iris-Williams, 215-597-6479.
EIS No. 20110014, Draft EIS, USFS, ID, Forest Plan Amendments Proposed
to Facilitate Implementation of the 2011 Plan-Scale Wildlife
Conservation Strategy Phase 1: Forested Biological Community, Payette
National Forest, Adam, Idaho, Valley and Washington Counties, ID,
Comment Period Ends: 04/20/2011, Contact: Sue Dixon, 208-634-0700.
EIS No. 20110015, Draft EIS, USFWS, WA, Willapa National Wildlife
Refuge Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Implementation, Pacific
County, WA, Comment Period Ends: 03/07/2011, Contact: Charles Houghten,
503-231-6207.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20110009, Draft EIS, GSA, DC, Nebraska Avenue Complex Master
Plan, Propose to Consolidate Over 28,000 DHS Employees, Location 3801
Nebraska Ave., NW., Washington, DC, Comment Period Ends: 03/01/2011,
Contact: Suzanne Hill, 202-205-5821. Revision to FR Notice 01/14/2011.
Correction to the Status from Final EIS to Draft EIS.
Dated: January 18, 2011.
Cliff Rader,
Environmental Protection Specialist, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2011-1259 Filed 1-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P