Prohibitions in Areas Designated by Order; Closure of National Forest System Lands To Protect Privacy of Tribal Activities, 3015-3017 [2011-937]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Commencement Bay, WA from 12:01
a.m. on January 6, 2011, through 11:59
p.m. on January 29, 2011. This action is
necessary for the security of Department
of Defense assets and military cargo
during loading and off-loading
operations taking place within the Blair
Waterway, Commencement Bay, WA.
During periods of enforcement, no
person or vessel operator may enter the
security zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
DATES: The security zone described in
33 CFR 165.1321 (c)(1) will be enforced
from 12:01 a.m. on January 6, 2011,
through 11:59 p.m. on January 29, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or e-mail LTJG Ashley M. Wanzer,
Waterways Management Division,
Sector Puget Sound, Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6175, e-mail
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Blair Waterway
security zone in Commencement Bay,
WA for protection of military cargo in
33 CFR 165.1321 from 12:01 a.m. on
January 6, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. on
January 29, 2011. A discussion of these
regulations can be found in the
preamble of a final rule published
December 10, 2004 (69 FR 71709).
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1321, vessel operators may not enter
the following security zone described in
§ 165.1321(c)(1): All waters enclosed by
a line connecting the following points:
47°16′57″ N, 122°24′39″ W, which is
approximately the beginning of Pier No.
23 (also known as the Army pier); then
northwesterly to 47°17′05″ N,
122°24′52″ W, which is the end of the
Pier No. 23 (Army pier); then
southwesterly to 47°16′42″ N,
122°25′18″ W, which is the approximate
location of a private buoy on the end of
the sewage outfall; then southeasterly to
47°16′33″ N, 122°25′04″ W, which is
approximately the northwestern end of
Pier No. 5; then northeasterly to the
northwestern end of Pier No. 1; then
southeasterly along the shoreline of the
Blair Waterway to the Blair Waterway
turning basin; then along the shoreline
around the Blair Waterway turning
basin; then northwesterly along the
shoreline of the Blair Waterway to the
Commencement Bay Directional Light
(light list number 17159); then
northeasterly along the shoreline to the
point of origin. [Datum: NAD 1983].
All vessel operators must obtain
permission from the COTP or
Designated Representative to enter,
move within, or exit the security zone
during periods of enforcement. To
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Jan 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
obtain permission to transit the zone
vessel operators can contact the onscene patrol craft on VHF Channel 16/
13 or VST Puget Sound on VHF Channel
14. Operators of vessels 20 meters or
greater in length should seek permission
from the COTP or a Designated
Representative at least 4 hours in
advance. Operators of vessels less than
20 meters in length should seek
permission at least 1 hour in advance.
Any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer may enforce the
rules of this section. The Coast Guard
may be assisted by other Federal, State,
or local law enforcement agencies in
enforcing this regulation. Vessels and
persons granted permission to enter the
security zone shall obey all lawful
orders or directions of the Captain of the
Port or Designated Representative. All
vessels shall be operated at a minimum
speed necessary to maintain a safe
course.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.1321 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
If the COTP determines that the
regulated area need not be enforced for
the full duration stated in this notice, he
may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
to temporarily grant general permission
to enter this zone during breaks between
loading and off-loading operations.
Upon notice of temporary periods of
suspension of enforcement by the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound, all
persons and vessels are authorized to
enter, transit, and exit this security zone
until the zone is reestablished and
subject to enforcement.
Dated: January 5, 2011.
Scott J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011–1034 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 261
RIN 0596–AC93
Prohibitions in Areas Designated by
Order; Closure of National Forest
System Lands To Protect Privacy of
Tribal Activities
Forest Service, USDA.
Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule is
implementing verbatim sections 8102
and 8104 of the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008 (FCEA) by adding
regulations regarding special closures to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3015
provide for closure of National Forest
System lands to protect the privacy of
tribal activities for traditional and
cultural purposes and by adding
definitions for ‘‘Indian tribe’’ and
‘‘traditional and cultural purpose.’’
FCEA authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture to ensure access to National
Forest System lands, to the maximum
extent practicable, by Indians and
Indian tribes for traditional and cultural
purposes, in recognition of the historic
use of National Forest System lands by
Indians and Indian tribes.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective January 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Holbrook, 202–205–1426,
Recreation, Heritage, and Volunteer
Resources staff. Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service at 800–877–8339 between 8 a.m.
and 8 p.m., Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
8104 of the FCEA authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to ensure access
to National Forest System lands, to the
maximum extent practicable, by Indians
and Indian tribes for traditional and
cultural purposes, in recognition of the
historic use of National Forest System
lands by Indians and Indian tribes.
Section 8102 of the FCEA defines
‘‘Indian tribe’’ as any Indian or Alaska
Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo,
village, or other community that is
included in a list published by the
Secretary of the Interior under section
104 of the Federally Recognized Indian
Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a–
1). Section 8102 of the FCEA states that
‘‘traditional and cultural purposes’’ with
respect to a definable use, area, or
practice means that the use, area, or
practice is identified by an Indian tribe
as traditional and cultural because of its
long-established significance or
ceremonial nature of the use, area, or
practice to the Indian tribe.
Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR
part 261, subpart B, establish
prohibitions relating to acts or
omissions involving National Forest
System lands. To implement section
8104 of the FCEA verbatim, the Forest
Service is adding a paragraph to 36 CFR
261.53 regarding special closures to
provide for closure of National Forest
System lands to protect the privacy of
tribal activities for traditional and
cultural purposes. To implement section
8102 of the FCEA verbatim, the Forest
Service is adding a definition for
‘‘Indian tribe’’ as ‘‘any Indian or Alaska
Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo,
village, or other community that is
included in a list published by the
E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM
19JAR1
3016
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Secretary of the Interior under section
104 of the Federally Recognized Indian
Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a–
1)’’ and a definition for ‘‘traditional and
cultural purpose’’ that states that it
means, with respect to a definable use,
area, or practice, that it is identified by
an Indian tribe as traditional and
cultural because of its long-established
significance or ceremonial nature for the
Indian tribe.
Good Cause Statement
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) exempts certain rulemaking from
its public notice and comment
requirements, including rulemaking
involving ‘‘public property’’ (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)), such as federal lands
managed by the Forest Service.
Furthermore, the APA allows agencies
to promulgate rules without public
notice and comment when an agency for
good cause finds that public notice and
comment are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest’’ (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)).
In 1971, Secretary of Agriculture
Hardin announced a voluntary waiver of
the public property exemption from
public notice and comment rulemaking
under the APA (July 24, 1971; 36 FR
13804). Thus, agencies in the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
generally provide public notice and
comment in promulgating rules.
However, the Hardin policy permits
USDA agencies to promulgate final rules
without public notice and comment
when the agencies find for good cause
that notice and comment procedures
would be impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest,
consistent with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The
courts have recognized this good cause
exception to the Hardin policy and have
indicated that since the public notice
and comment requirement was adopted
voluntarily, the Secretary should be
afforded ‘‘more latitude’’ in making a
good cause determination. See Alcaraz
v. Block, 746 F.2d 593, 612 (9th Cir.
1984).
The Department finds that good cause
exists to exempt this rulemaking from
public notice and comment pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Section 8104 of the
FCEA allows the Secretary to
‘‘temporarily close from public access
specifically identified National Forest
System land to protect the privacy of
tribal activities for traditional and
cultural purposes.’’ This rulemaking
prohibits public access into or upon an
area which is closed to protect the
privacy of tribal activities for traditional
and cultural purposes. Thus, the
prohibition against public access to
closed areas under 36 CFR 261.53
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Jan 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
merely implements the provision for
closure from public access set forth in
section 8104 of the FCEA. Such a
prohibition against access to closed
areas is dictated by section 8104 of the
FCEA; the agency has no discretion in
implementing these changes. Moreover,
the new provisions conform precisely to
the newly enacted statute and the
corresponding definitions in the statute.
Accordingly, because this rulemaking
involves purely minor, technical, and
nondiscretionary changes, the
Department finds that public notice and
comment are unnecessary pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Regulatory Certifications
Environmental Impact
This final rule makes purely minor,
technical changes to the Forest Service’s
regulations. Forest Service regulations at
36 CFR 220.6(d)(2) exclude from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement ‘‘rules, regulations, or policies
to establish Servicewide administrative
procedures, program processes, or
instructions.’’ The Department’s
conclusion is that this final rule falls
within this category of actions and that
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that would require preparation of an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Regulatory Impact
This final rule has been reviewed
under USDA procedures and Executive
Order (E.O.) 12866 on regulatory
planning and review. It has been
determined that this is not a significant
rule. This final rule will not have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy, nor will it adversely affect
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health and safety,
or State or local governments. This final
rule will not interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency, nor
will it raise new legal or policy issues.
Finally, this final rule will not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlement, grant,
user fee, or loan programs or the rights
and obligations of beneficiaries of such
programs. Accordingly, this final rule is
not subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review under E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department has considered this
final rule in light of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et seq.).
The final rule makes purely minor,
technical changes to the Forest Service’s
regulations. This final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
defined by the act because the final rule
will not impose recordkeeping
requirements on them; it will not affect
their competitive position in relation to
large entities; and it will not affect their
cash flow, liquidity, or ability to remain
in the market.
No Takings Implications
The Department has analyzed this
final rule in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in E.O.
12630. The Department has determined
that the final rule will not pose the risk
of a taking of private property.
Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed this
final rule under E.O. 12988 on civil
justice reform. After adoption of this
final rule, (1) All State and local laws
and regulations that conflict with this
rule or that impede its full
implementation will be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect will be given to this
final rule; and (3) it will not require
administrative proceedings before
parties may file suit in court challenging
its provisions.
Federalism and Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has considered this
final rule under the requirements of E.O.
13132 on federalism and has
determined that the final rule conforms
with the federalism principles set out in
this E.O.; will not impose any
compliance costs on the States; and will
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, the
Department has determined that no
further assessment of federalism
implications is necessary.
Moreover, the Department has
determined that promulgation of this
final rule does not require advance
consultation with Indian tribal officials
as set forth in E.O. 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments. Section 5(b) of E.O. 13175
requires that, to the extent practicable
and permitted by law, agencies shall
consult with tribal officials in the
promulgation of ‘‘any regulation that has
tribal implications, that imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and that is
not required by statute.’’ This
rulemaking merely implements
verbatim two existing statutory
provisions, sections 8102 and 8104 of
the FCEA, and involves only minor,
purely technical, and nondiscretionary
E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM
19JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory changes. Moreover, these
regulatory changes do not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments. Accordingly,
the Department has determined that
advance consultation with Tribes is not
required for this rulemaking. In the
future if the Department publishes
additional directives or guidance on
how to implement this regulation in the
Forest Service Manual or Forest Service
Handbook, the Department will consult
with Tribes prior to its publication. At
this time, the Department does not
intend to publish additional guidance
on how to implement this regulation.
Energy Effects
The Department has reviewed this
final rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Department
has determined that this final rule does
not constitute a significant energy action
as defined in the E.O.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538), the Department has
assessed the effects of this final rule on
State, local, and Tribal governments and
the private sector. This final rule will
not compel the expenditure of $100
million or more by any State, local, or
Tribal government or anyone in the
private sector. Therefore, a statement
under section 202 of the act is not
required.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public
This final rule does not contain any
recordkeeping or reporting requirements
or other information collection
requirements as defined in 5 CFR part
1320 that are not already required by
law or not already approved for use.
Accordingly, the review provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part
1320 do not apply.
Text of the Final Rule
Subpart A—General Prohibitions
2. In § 261.2, add definitions for
Indian tribe and traditional and cultural
purpose in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
■
§ 261.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Indian tribe means any Indian or
Alaska Native tribe, band, nation,
pueblo, village, or other community that
is included on a list published by the
Secretary of the Interior under section
104 of the Federally Recognized Indian
Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C.
479a–1).
*
*
*
*
*
Traditional and cultural purpose
means, with respect to a definable use,
area, or practice, that it is identified by
an Indian tribe as traditional or cultural
because of its long-established
significance or ceremonial nature for the
Indian tribe.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—Prohibitions in Areas
Designated by Order
3. Amend § 261.53 by adding
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
■
§ 261.53
Special closures.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) The privacy of tribal activities for
traditional and cultural purposes.
Closure to protect the privacy of tribal
activities for traditional and cultural
purposes must be requested by an
Indian tribe; is subject to approval by
the Forest Service; shall be temporary;
and shall affect the smallest practicable
area for the minimum period necessary
for activities of the requesting Indian
tribe.
Dated: January 11, 2011.
Jay Jensen,
Deputy Under Secretary, NRE.
[FR Doc. 2011–937 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 261
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1011(f), 16 U.S.C. 472,
551, 620(f), 1133(c), (d)(1), 1246(i).
Crime, Law enforcement, National
forests.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, part 261 of title 36 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
38 CFR Part 74
RIN 2900–AM78
VA Veteran-Owned Small Business
Verification Guidelines
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
PART 261—PROHIBITIONS
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for part 261
continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Jan 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
This document affirms as
final, with changes, a final rule with
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3017
request for comments that implemented
portions of the Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act
of 2006. This law requires the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to
verify ownership and control of veteranowned small businesses, including
service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses. This final rule rescinds the
requirement that eligible owners work
full-time in the business for which they
have applied for acceptance in the
Verification Program and that limits
participants to a single business. It
formally changes the time period for
issuance of reconsideration decisions
from 30 to 60 days and changes the
distribution of profits for limited
liability companies and employee stock
ownership plans.
Effective Date: This final rule is
effective February 18, 2011.
DATES:
Ms.
Gail Wegner, Deputy Director, Center for
Veterans Enterprise (00VE), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, phone
(202) 303–3260 x5239.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
In a final
rule with request for comments
published in the Federal Register on
February 8, 2010, (75 FR 6098), we
revised 38 CFR part 74 setting forth a
mechanism for verifying ownership and
control of veteran-owned small
businesses (VOSBs), including servicedisabled veteran-owned small
businesses (SDVOSBs). We solicited
comments on the following new interim
final requirements: Requiring eligible
owners work full-time in the business
for which they have applied for
acceptance in the VOSB or SDVOSB
Verification Program, changing the time
period for issuance of reconsideration
decisions from 30 to 60 days, and
changing the distribution of profits for
limited liability companies and
employee stock ownership plans. We
provided a 30-day comment period
which ended on March 10, 2010. We
received more than 100 comments on
the interim final requirements. The
issues raised in the comments are
discussed below. Based upon the
rationale set forth in this document, we
are rescinding the interim final
provisions that require owners to work
full-time in the business for which they
have applied for acceptance in the
Verification Program and which limit
participants to a single business. We are
also formally changing the time period
for issuance of reconsideration
decisions from 30 to 60 days and
changing the distribution of profits for
limited liability companies (LLC) and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM
19JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3015-3017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-937]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 261
RIN 0596-AC93
Prohibitions in Areas Designated by Order; Closure of National
Forest System Lands To Protect Privacy of Tribal Activities
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule is implementing verbatim sections 8102 and
8104 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (FCEA) by adding
regulations regarding special closures to provide for closure of
National Forest System lands to protect the privacy of tribal
activities for traditional and cultural purposes and by adding
definitions for ``Indian tribe'' and ``traditional and cultural
purpose.'' FCEA authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to ensure
access to National Forest System lands, to the maximum extent
practicable, by Indians and Indian tribes for traditional and cultural
purposes, in recognition of the historic use of National Forest System
lands by Indians and Indian tribes.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective January 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Holbrook, 202-205-1426,
Recreation, Heritage, and Volunteer Resources staff. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the deaf may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 8104 of the FCEA authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to ensure access to National Forest System
lands, to the maximum extent practicable, by Indians and Indian tribes
for traditional and cultural purposes, in recognition of the historic
use of National Forest System lands by Indians and Indian tribes.
Section 8102 of the FCEA defines ``Indian tribe'' as any Indian or
Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or other community
that is included in a list published by the Secretary of the Interior
under section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of
1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a-1). Section 8102 of the FCEA states that
``traditional and cultural purposes'' with respect to a definable use,
area, or practice means that the use, area, or practice is identified
by an Indian tribe as traditional and cultural because of its long-
established significance or ceremonial nature of the use, area, or
practice to the Indian tribe.
Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, establish
prohibitions relating to acts or omissions involving National Forest
System lands. To implement section 8104 of the FCEA verbatim, the
Forest Service is adding a paragraph to 36 CFR 261.53 regarding special
closures to provide for closure of National Forest System lands to
protect the privacy of tribal activities for traditional and cultural
purposes. To implement section 8102 of the FCEA verbatim, the Forest
Service is adding a definition for ``Indian tribe'' as ``any Indian or
Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or other community
that is included in a list published by the
[[Page 3016]]
Secretary of the Interior under section 104 of the Federally Recognized
Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a-1)'' and a definition for
``traditional and cultural purpose'' that states that it means, with
respect to a definable use, area, or practice, that it is identified by
an Indian tribe as traditional and cultural because of its long-
established significance or ceremonial nature for the Indian tribe.
Good Cause Statement
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) exempts certain rulemaking
from its public notice and comment requirements, including rulemaking
involving ``public property'' (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)), such as federal
lands managed by the Forest Service. Furthermore, the APA allows
agencies to promulgate rules without public notice and comment when an
agency for good cause finds that public notice and comment are
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest'' (5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B)).
In 1971, Secretary of Agriculture Hardin announced a voluntary
waiver of the public property exemption from public notice and comment
rulemaking under the APA (July 24, 1971; 36 FR 13804). Thus, agencies
in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) generally provide public
notice and comment in promulgating rules. However, the Hardin policy
permits USDA agencies to promulgate final rules without public notice
and comment when the agencies find for good cause that notice and
comment procedures would be impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest, consistent with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). The courts
have recognized this good cause exception to the Hardin policy and have
indicated that since the public notice and comment requirement was
adopted voluntarily, the Secretary should be afforded ``more latitude''
in making a good cause determination. See Alcaraz v. Block, 746 F.2d
593, 612 (9th Cir. 1984).
The Department finds that good cause exists to exempt this
rulemaking from public notice and comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). Section 8104 of the FCEA allows the Secretary to
``temporarily close from public access specifically identified National
Forest System land to protect the privacy of tribal activities for
traditional and cultural purposes.'' This rulemaking prohibits public
access into or upon an area which is closed to protect the privacy of
tribal activities for traditional and cultural purposes. Thus, the
prohibition against public access to closed areas under 36 CFR 261.53
merely implements the provision for closure from public access set
forth in section 8104 of the FCEA. Such a prohibition against access to
closed areas is dictated by section 8104 of the FCEA; the agency has no
discretion in implementing these changes. Moreover, the new provisions
conform precisely to the newly enacted statute and the corresponding
definitions in the statute. Accordingly, because this rulemaking
involves purely minor, technical, and nondiscretionary changes, the
Department finds that public notice and comment are unnecessary
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
Regulatory Certifications
Environmental Impact
This final rule makes purely minor, technical changes to the Forest
Service's regulations. Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR 220.6(d)(2)
exclude from documentation in an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to
establish Servicewide administrative procedures, program processes, or
instructions.'' The Department's conclusion is that this final rule
falls within this category of actions and that no extraordinary
circumstances exist that would require preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact statement.
Regulatory Impact
This final rule has been reviewed under USDA procedures and
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 on regulatory planning and review. It has
been determined that this is not a significant rule. This final rule
will not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy,
nor will it adversely affect productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health and safety, or State or local governments.
This final rule will not interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency, nor will it raise new legal or policy issues. Finally,
this final rule will not alter the budgetary impact of entitlement,
grant, user fee, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of
beneficiaries of such programs. Accordingly, this final rule is not
subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review under E.O.
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department has considered this final rule in light of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et seq.). The final rule makes
purely minor, technical changes to the Forest Service's regulations.
This final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as defined by the act because the
final rule will not impose recordkeeping requirements on them; it will
not affect their competitive position in relation to large entities;
and it will not affect their cash flow, liquidity, or ability to remain
in the market.
No Takings Implications
The Department has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in E.O. 12630. The Department has
determined that the final rule will not pose the risk of a taking of
private property.
Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed this final rule under E.O. 12988 on
civil justice reform. After adoption of this final rule, (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that conflict with this rule or that
impede its full implementation will be preempted; (2) no retroactive
effect will be given to this final rule; and (3) it will not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging its provisions.
Federalism and Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has considered this final rule under the
requirements of E.O. 13132 on federalism and has determined that the
final rule conforms with the federalism principles set out in this
E.O.; will not impose any compliance costs on the States; and will not
have substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between
the Federal government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the
Department has determined that no further assessment of federalism
implications is necessary.
Moreover, the Department has determined that promulgation of this
final rule does not require advance consultation with Indian tribal
officials as set forth in E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments. Section 5(b) of E.O. 13175 requires
that, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, agencies shall
consult with tribal officials in the promulgation of ``any regulation
that has tribal implications, that imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and that is not required
by statute.'' This rulemaking merely implements verbatim two existing
statutory provisions, sections 8102 and 8104 of the FCEA, and involves
only minor, purely technical, and nondiscretionary
[[Page 3017]]
regulatory changes. Moreover, these regulatory changes do not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments.
Accordingly, the Department has determined that advance consultation
with Tribes is not required for this rulemaking. In the future if the
Department publishes additional directives or guidance on how to
implement this regulation in the Forest Service Manual or Forest
Service Handbook, the Department will consult with Tribes prior to its
publication. At this time, the Department does not intend to publish
additional guidance on how to implement this regulation.
Energy Effects
The Department has reviewed this final rule under E.O. 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Department has determined that this final
rule does not constitute a significant energy action as defined in the
E.O.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538), the Department has assessed the effects of this
final rule on State, local, and Tribal governments and the private
sector. This final rule will not compel the expenditure of $100 million
or more by any State, local, or Tribal government or anyone in the
private sector. Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the act is
not required.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public
This final rule does not contain any recordkeeping or reporting
requirements or other information collection requirements as defined in
5 CFR part 1320 that are not already required by law or not already
approved for use. Accordingly, the review provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not apply.
Text of the Final Rule
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 261
Crime, Law enforcement, National forests.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 261 of title 36 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 261--PROHIBITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1011(f), 16 U.S.C. 472, 551, 620(f),
1133(c), (d)(1), 1246(i).
Subpart A--General Prohibitions
0
2. In Sec. 261.2, add definitions for Indian tribe and traditional and
cultural purpose in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 261.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Indian tribe means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation,
pueblo, village, or other community that is included on a list
published by the Secretary of the Interior under section 104 of the
Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a-1).
* * * * *
Traditional and cultural purpose means, with respect to a definable
use, area, or practice, that it is identified by an Indian tribe as
traditional or cultural because of its long-established significance or
ceremonial nature for the Indian tribe.
* * * * *
Subpart B--Prohibitions in Areas Designated by Order
0
3. Amend Sec. 261.53 by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 261.53 Special closures.
* * * * *
(g) The privacy of tribal activities for traditional and cultural
purposes. Closure to protect the privacy of tribal activities for
traditional and cultural purposes must be requested by an Indian tribe;
is subject to approval by the Forest Service; shall be temporary; and
shall affect the smallest practicable area for the minimum period
necessary for activities of the requesting Indian tribe.
Dated: January 11, 2011.
Jay Jensen,
Deputy Under Secretary, NRE.
[FR Doc. 2011-937 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P