Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy American) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the City of Columbia, MO, 3136-3138 [2011-1018]

Download as PDF 3136 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, remember to: i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives. vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. 3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Jan 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide(s) discussed in this document, compared to the general population. Following the review of the application and any comments and data received in response to this solicitation, EPA will decide whether to issue or deny the EUP request, and if issued, the conditions under which it is to be conducted. Any issuance of an EUP will be announced in the Federal Register. II. What action is the agency taking? [FR Doc. 2011–1021 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am] Under section 5 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136c, EPA can allow manufacturers to field test pesticides under development. Manufacturers are required to obtain an EUP before testing new pesticides or new uses of pesticides if they conduct experimental field tests on 10 acres or more of land or one acre or more of water. In accordance with 40 CFR 172.11(a), the Agency has determined that the following EUP application may be of regional and national significance, and therefore is seeking public comment on the EUP application: Submitter: Syngenta Seeds Inc., (67979–EUP–8). Pesticide Chemical: [Event 5307] Bacillus thuringiensis eCry3.1Ab protein and the genetic material necessary for its production (vector pSYN12274) in Event 5307 corn (SYN– ;53;7–1). Summary of Request: In the Federal Register of September 22, 2010 (75 FR 57778) (FRL–8844–4) EPA announced issuance of 67979–EUP–8. This extension application is for 3,791 acres of Event 5307 and related PIP acreage as described under SUMMARY and 3,122 acres of non-PIP corn from March 2012 to December 2013. Two protocols will be conducted, including: Efficacy evaluation and regulatory studies. States and Commonwealth involved include: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. A copy of the application and any information submitted is available for public review in the docket established for this EUP application as described under ADDRESSES. PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 List of Subjects Environmental protection, Experimental use permits. Dated: January 6, 2011. Keith A. Matthews, Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–R07–OW–2010–1084; FRL–9254–3] Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy American) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the City of Columbia, MO Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The EPA is hereby granting a waiver of the Buy American requirements of ARRA Section 1605 under the authority of Section 1605(b) (2) [manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality] to the City of Columbia, MO (‘‘City’’) for the purchase of two (2) foreign manufactured Toshiba LQ500 Density Analyzers in Columbia, Missouri. This is a project specific waiver and only applies to the use of the specified product for the ARRA project being proposed. Any other ARRA recipient that wishes to use the same product must apply for a separate waiver based on project specific circumstances. Based upon critical performance requirements and project specifications for the Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer, a list of potential manufacturers, project schedule, and a price comparison worksheet of the different manufacturers submitted by the City and its consulting engineer, it has been determined that there are currently no domestically manufactured density analyzers available to meet the City’s project specifications. The Regional Administrator is making this determination based on the review and recommendations of the Clean Water SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff. The Assistant Administrator of the Office of Administration and Resources Management has concurred on this decision to make an exception to Section 1605 of ARRA. This action permits the purchase of two foreign manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers. City of Columbia, MO has provided sufficient documentation to support their waiver request. DATES: Effective Date: January 6, 2011 . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Simmons, Environmental Engineer, Water Wetlands and Pesticides Division (WWPD), (913) 551– 7237, U.S. EPA Region 7, 901 N. Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with ARRA Section 1605(c), the EPA hereby provides notice that it is granting a project waiver of the requirements of Section 1605 (a) of Public Law 111–5, Buy American requirements, to the City of Columbia, MO (‘‘City’’) for the purchase of two nondomestically manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers, to meet the City’s design and performance specifications as part of its proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility Phase 1 Improvement project in Columbia, MO. Section 1605 of the ARRA requires that none of the appropriated funds may be used for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or a public works project unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project is produced in the United States, or unless a waiver is provided to the recipient by the head of the appropriate agency, here the EPA. A waiver may be provided if EPA determines that (1) Applying these requirements would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) inclusion of iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent. The City of Columbia, MO is proposing a wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) improvement project phase 1 that includes the use of a nondomestically manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer. The Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers measure the density of the WWTF’s primary sludge as a parameter for sludge waste process control. The Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer provides improved settling of microbiological populations, provides VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Jan 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 improved nutrient removal, maintains constant mass solids loading to activated sludge thickeners, and reduces variability of Total Solids (TS) concentrations which results in a considerable improvement of thickener performance. Project specifications for a density analyzer require the following to meet the design and performance criteria: (1) The density analyzer shall consist of an element and transmitter that utilizes the microwave phase difference method to determine the density of that process fluid; (2) The element shall consist of an obstruction-less microwave source; (3) The element shall mount, nonintrusively, in line with the process piping using mounting hardware furnished with the device; (4) The element components shall be rated for explosion proof service; and (5) The transmitter shall be microprocessor based, generate an isolated 4–20 mA dc output proportional to the process density, and be provided in a NEMA 4 rated, wall mounted enclosure. The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff has reviewed this waiver request and has determined that the supporting documentation provided by the City of Columbia, MO establishes both a proper basis to specify a particular manufactured good, and that there is no domestic manufactured good currently available. The information provided is sufficient to meet the following criteria listed under Section 1605(b) of the ARRA and in the April 28, 2009 Memorandum: Iron, steel, and the manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality. The LQ500 density/consistency analyzer is manufactured nondomestically by the Toshiba Corporation. The supporting documentation and independent research and communication with manufacturers of in-line, non-intrusive sludge density analytical process analyzers conducted by EPA’s national contractor demonstrate that there are no U.S. manufacturers able to meet the project specifications. None of the companies contacted by EPA’s national contractor manufacture their density analytical instruments in the United States. EPA has also evaluated Columbia, MO’s waiver request to determine if its submission is considered late or if it could be considered timely, as per the OMB Guidance at 2 CFR 176.120. EPA will generally regard waiver requests with respect to components that were PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3137 specified in the bid solicitation or in a general/primary construction contract as ‘‘late’’ if submitted after the contract date. However, EPA could also determine that a request be evaluated as timely, though made after the date that the contract was signed, if the need for a waiver was not reasonably foreseeable. If the need for a waiver is reasonably foreseeable, then EPA could still apply discretion in these late cases as per the OMB Guidance, which says ‘‘the award official may deny the request.’’ For those waiver requests that do not have a reasonably unforeseeable basis for lateness, but for which the waiver basis is valid and there is no apparent gain by the ARRA recipient or loss on behalf of the government, then EPA will still consider granting a waiver. In this case, there are no U.S. manufacturers that meet Columbia, MO’s project specification for the density analyzer. The waiver request was not made prior to the contract being signed because initially the manufacturer said their product was substantially transformed in the U.S.; however, Columbia, MO did not accept this documentation. There is no indication that Columbia, MO failed to request a waiver in order to avoid the requirements of the ARRA, particularly since there are no domestically manufactured products available that meet the project specifications. EPA will consider Columbia, MO’s waiver request, a foreseeable late request, as though it had been timely made since there is no gain by Columbia, MO and no loss by the government due to the late request. Furthermore, the purpose of the ARRA is to stimulate economic recovery by funding current infrastructure construction, not to delay projects that are ‘‘shovel ready’’ by requiring potential SRF eligible recipients, such as the City of Columbia, MO, to revise their design standards and specifications as well as their construction schedule. There are no domestic manufacturers that can provide density analyzers that meet the specifications of this WWTF improvement project. To delay this construction would directly conflict with a fundamental economic purpose of ARRA, which is to create or retain jobs. The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ Memorandum, ‘‘Implementation of Buy American provisions of Public Law 111–5, the ‘American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009’ ’’ (‘‘Memorandum’’), defines reasonably available quantity as ‘‘the quantity of iron, steel, or relevant manufactured good is available or will be available at the time needed and place needed, and E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1 3138 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices in the proper form or specification as specified in the project plans and design.’’ The same Memorandum defines ‘‘satisfactory quality’’ as ‘‘the quality of steel, iron or manufactured good specified in the project plans and designs.’’ The March 31, 2009 Delegation of Authority Memorandum provided Regional Administrators with the temporary authority to issue exceptions to Section 1605 of the ARRA within the geographic boundaries of their respective regions and with respect to requests by individual grant recipients. Having established both a proper basis to specify the particular manufactured good required for this project and that this manufactured good was not available from a producer in the United States, the City is hereby granted a waiver from the Buy American requirements of Section 1605(a) of Public Law 111–5. This waiver permits use of ARRA funds for the purchase of a non-domestic manufactured Toshiba LQ500 Density Analyzers documented in City’s waiver request submittal dated August 11, 2010. This supplementary information constitutes the detailed written justification required by Section 1605(c) for waivers based on a finding under subsection (b). Authority: Pub. L. 111–5, section 1605. Dated: January 6, 2011. Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, Region 7. [FR Doc. 2011–1018 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0014; FRL–8857–1] Notice of Receipt of Requests To Voluntarily Cancel Certain Pesticide Registrations Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with section 6(f)(1) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, EPA is issuing a notice of receipt of requests by registrants to voluntarily cancel certain pesticide registrations. EPA intends to grant these requests at the close of the comment period for this announcement unless the Agency receives substantive comments within the comment period that would merit its further review of the requests, or unless the registrants withdraw their requests. If these requests are granted, any sale, mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:04 Jan 18, 2011 Jkt 223001 distribution, or use of products listed in this notice will be permitted after the registrations have been canceled only if such sale, distribution, or use is consistent with the terms as described in the final order. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 14, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0014, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Submit written withdrawal request by mail to: Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. Attention: Maia Tatinclaux. • Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Facility’s normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805. Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010– 0014. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through https:// www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either in the electronic docket at https:// www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maia Tatinclaux, Pesticide Reevaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460– 0001; telephone number: (703) 347– 0123; e-mail address: tatinclaux.maia@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. If you have any questions regarding the information in this notice, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through https:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM 19JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3136-3138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R07-OW-2010-1084; FRL-9254-3]


Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy 
American) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) 
to the City of Columbia, MO

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is hereby granting a waiver of the Buy American 
requirements of ARRA Section 1605 under the authority of Section 
1605(b) (2) [manufactured goods are not produced in the United States 
in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory 
quality] to the City of Columbia, MO (``City'') for the purchase of two 
(2) foreign manufactured Toshiba LQ500 Density Analyzers in Columbia, 
Missouri. This is a project specific waiver and only applies to the use 
of the specified product for the ARRA project being proposed. Any other 
ARRA recipient that wishes to use the same product must apply for a 
separate waiver based on project specific circumstances. Based upon 
critical performance requirements and project specifications for the 
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer, a list of potential manufacturers, 
project schedule, and a price comparison worksheet of the different 
manufacturers submitted by the City and its consulting engineer, it has 
been determined that there are currently no domestically manufactured 
density analyzers available to meet the City's project specifications. 
The Regional Administrator is making this determination based on the 
review and recommendations of the Clean Water

[[Page 3137]]

State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff. The Assistant Administrator of the 
Office of Administration and Resources Management has concurred on this 
decision to make an exception to Section 1605 of ARRA. This action 
permits the purchase of two foreign manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density 
analyzers. City of Columbia, MO has provided sufficient documentation 
to support their waiver request.

DATES: Effective Date: January 6, 2011 .

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Simmons, Environmental 
Engineer, Water Wetlands and Pesticides Division (WWPD), (913) 551-
7237, U.S. EPA Region 7, 901 N. Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with ARRA Section 1605(c), the 
EPA hereby provides notice that it is granting a project waiver of the 
requirements of Section 1605 (a) of Public Law 111-5, Buy American 
requirements, to the City of Columbia, MO (``City'') for the purchase 
of two non-domestically manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers, 
to meet the City's design and performance specifications as part of its 
proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility Phase 1 Improvement project in 
Columbia, MO.
    Section 1605 of the ARRA requires that none of the appropriated 
funds may be used for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or 
repair of a public building or a public works project unless all of the 
iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project is produced in 
the United States, or unless a waiver is provided to the recipient by 
the head of the appropriate agency, here the EPA. A waiver may be 
provided if EPA determines that (1) Applying these requirements would 
be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) iron, steel, and the 
relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in 
sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory 
quality; or (3) inclusion of iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured 
goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the 
overall project by more than 25 percent.
    The City of Columbia, MO is proposing a wastewater treatment 
facility (WWTF) improvement project phase 1 that includes the use of a 
non-domestically manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer. The 
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers measure the density of the WWTF's 
primary sludge as a parameter for sludge waste process control. The 
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer provides improved settling of 
microbiological populations, provides improved nutrient removal, 
maintains constant mass solids loading to activated sludge thickeners, 
and reduces variability of Total Solids (TS) concentrations which 
results in a considerable improvement of thickener performance. Project 
specifications for a density analyzer require the following to meet the 
design and performance criteria:
    (1) The density analyzer shall consist of an element and 
transmitter that utilizes the microwave phase difference method to 
determine the density of that process fluid;
    (2) The element shall consist of an obstruction-less microwave 
source;
    (3) The element shall mount, non-intrusively, in line with the 
process piping using mounting hardware furnished with the device;
    (4) The element components shall be rated for explosion proof 
service; and
    (5) The transmitter shall be microprocessor based, generate an 
isolated 4-20 mA dc output proportional to the process density, and be 
provided in a NEMA 4 rated, wall mounted enclosure.
    The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff has reviewed 
this waiver request and has determined that the supporting 
documentation provided by the City of Columbia, MO establishes both a 
proper basis to specify a particular manufactured good, and that there 
is no domestic manufactured good currently available. The information 
provided is sufficient to meet the following criteria listed under 
Section 1605(b) of the ARRA and in the April 28, 2009 Memorandum: Iron, 
steel, and the manufactured goods are not produced in the United States 
in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory 
quality.
    The LQ500 density/consistency analyzer is manufactured non-
domestically by the Toshiba Corporation. The supporting documentation 
and independent research and communication with manufacturers of in-
line, non-intrusive sludge density analytical process analyzers 
conducted by EPA's national contractor demonstrate that there are no 
U.S. manufacturers able to meet the project specifications. None of the 
companies contacted by EPA's national contractor manufacture their 
density analytical instruments in the United States.
    EPA has also evaluated Columbia, MO's waiver request to determine 
if its submission is considered late or if it could be considered 
timely, as per the OMB Guidance at 2 CFR 176.120. EPA will generally 
regard waiver requests with respect to components that were specified 
in the bid solicitation or in a general/primary construction contract 
as ``late'' if submitted after the contract date. However, EPA could 
also determine that a request be evaluated as timely, though made after 
the date that the contract was signed, if the need for a waiver was not 
reasonably foreseeable. If the need for a waiver is reasonably 
foreseeable, then EPA could still apply discretion in these late cases 
as per the OMB Guidance, which says ``the award official may deny the 
request.'' For those waiver requests that do not have a reasonably 
unforeseeable basis for lateness, but for which the waiver basis is 
valid and there is no apparent gain by the ARRA recipient or loss on 
behalf of the government, then EPA will still consider granting a 
waiver.
    In this case, there are no U.S. manufacturers that meet Columbia, 
MO's project specification for the density analyzer. The waiver request 
was not made prior to the contract being signed because initially the 
manufacturer said their product was substantially transformed in the 
U.S.; however, Columbia, MO did not accept this documentation. There is 
no indication that Columbia, MO failed to request a waiver in order to 
avoid the requirements of the ARRA, particularly since there are no 
domestically manufactured products available that meet the project 
specifications. EPA will consider Columbia, MO's waiver request, a 
foreseeable late request, as though it had been timely made since there 
is no gain by Columbia, MO and no loss by the government due to the 
late request.
    Furthermore, the purpose of the ARRA is to stimulate economic 
recovery by funding current infrastructure construction, not to delay 
projects that are ``shovel ready'' by requiring potential SRF eligible 
recipients, such as the City of Columbia, MO, to revise their design 
standards and specifications as well as their construction schedule. 
There are no domestic manufacturers that can provide density analyzers 
that meet the specifications of this WWTF improvement project. To delay 
this construction would directly conflict with a fundamental economic 
purpose of ARRA, which is to create or retain jobs.
    The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ Memorandum, ``Implementation of Buy 
American provisions of Public Law 111-5, the `American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009' '' (``Memorandum''), defines reasonably 
available quantity as ``the quantity of iron, steel, or relevant 
manufactured good is available or will be available at the time needed 
and place needed, and

[[Page 3138]]

in the proper form or specification as specified in the project plans 
and design.'' The same Memorandum defines ``satisfactory quality'' as 
``the quality of steel, iron or manufactured good specified in the 
project plans and designs.''
    The March 31, 2009 Delegation of Authority Memorandum provided 
Regional Administrators with the temporary authority to issue 
exceptions to Section 1605 of the ARRA within the geographic boundaries 
of their respective regions and with respect to requests by individual 
grant recipients.
    Having established both a proper basis to specify the particular 
manufactured good required for this project and that this manufactured 
good was not available from a producer in the United States, the City 
is hereby granted a waiver from the Buy American requirements of 
Section 1605(a) of Public Law 111-5. This waiver permits use of ARRA 
funds for the purchase of a non-domestic manufactured Toshiba LQ500 
Density Analyzers documented in City's waiver request submittal dated 
August 11, 2010. This supplementary information constitutes the 
detailed written justification required by Section 1605(c) for waivers 
based on a finding under subsection (b).

    Authority: Pub. L. 111-5, section 1605.

    Dated: January 6, 2011.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2011-1018 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.