Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy American) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the City of Columbia, MO, 3136-3138 [2011-1018]
Download as PDF
3136
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
testing of chemical substances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) or the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA). Since other entities may also
be interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Jan 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental
effects from exposure to the pesticide(s)
discussed in this document, compared
to the general population.
Following the review of the
application and any comments and data
received in response to this solicitation,
EPA will decide whether to issue or
deny the EUP request, and if issued, the
conditions under which it is to be
conducted. Any issuance of an EUP will
be announced in the Federal Register.
II. What action is the agency taking?
[FR Doc. 2011–1021 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am]
Under section 5 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C.
136c, EPA can allow manufacturers to
field test pesticides under development.
Manufacturers are required to obtain an
EUP before testing new pesticides or
new uses of pesticides if they conduct
experimental field tests on 10 acres or
more of land or one acre or more of
water.
In accordance with 40 CFR 172.11(a),
the Agency has determined that the
following EUP application may be of
regional and national significance, and
therefore is seeking public comment on
the EUP application:
Submitter: Syngenta Seeds Inc.,
(67979–EUP–8).
Pesticide Chemical: [Event 5307]
Bacillus thuringiensis eCry3.1Ab
protein and the genetic material
necessary for its production (vector
pSYN12274) in Event 5307 corn (SYN–
;53;7–1).
Summary of Request: In the Federal
Register of September 22, 2010 (75 FR
57778) (FRL–8844–4) EPA announced
issuance of 67979–EUP–8. This
extension application is for 3,791 acres
of Event 5307 and related PIP acreage as
described under SUMMARY and 3,122
acres of non-PIP corn from March 2012
to December 2013. Two protocols will
be conducted, including: Efficacy
evaluation and regulatory studies. States
and Commonwealth involved include:
Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota,
Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New
York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Puerto Rico, South Carolina, South
Dakota, Texas, Washington, and
Wisconsin.
A copy of the application and any
information submitted is available for
public review in the docket established
for this EUP application as described
under ADDRESSES.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Experimental use permits.
Dated: January 6, 2011.
Keith A. Matthews,
Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R07–OW–2010–1084; FRL–9254–3]
Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of
Section 1605 (Buy American) of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (ARRA) to the City of
Columbia, MO
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The EPA is hereby granting a
waiver of the Buy American
requirements of ARRA Section 1605
under the authority of Section 1605(b)
(2) [manufactured goods are not
produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available
quantities and of a satisfactory quality]
to the City of Columbia, MO (‘‘City’’) for
the purchase of two (2) foreign
manufactured Toshiba LQ500 Density
Analyzers in Columbia, Missouri. This
is a project specific waiver and only
applies to the use of the specified
product for the ARRA project being
proposed. Any other ARRA recipient
that wishes to use the same product
must apply for a separate waiver based
on project specific circumstances. Based
upon critical performance requirements
and project specifications for the
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer, a list
of potential manufacturers, project
schedule, and a price comparison
worksheet of the different
manufacturers submitted by the City
and its consulting engineer, it has been
determined that there are currently no
domestically manufactured density
analyzers available to meet the City’s
project specifications. The Regional
Administrator is making this
determination based on the review and
recommendations of the Clean Water
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices
State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff.
The Assistant Administrator of the
Office of Administration and Resources
Management has concurred on this
decision to make an exception to
Section 1605 of ARRA. This action
permits the purchase of two foreign
manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density
analyzers. City of Columbia, MO has
provided sufficient documentation to
support their waiver request.
DATES: Effective Date: January 6, 2011 .
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Simmons, Environmental
Engineer, Water Wetlands and
Pesticides Division (WWPD), (913) 551–
7237, U.S. EPA Region 7, 901 N. Fifth
Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with ARRA Section 1605(c),
the EPA hereby provides notice that it
is granting a project waiver of the
requirements of Section 1605 (a) of
Public Law 111–5, Buy American
requirements, to the City of Columbia,
MO (‘‘City’’) for the purchase of two nondomestically manufactured Toshiba
LQ500 density analyzers, to meet the
City’s design and performance
specifications as part of its proposed
Wastewater Treatment Facility Phase 1
Improvement project in Columbia, MO.
Section 1605 of the ARRA requires
that none of the appropriated funds may
be used for the construction, alteration,
maintenance, or repair of a public
building or a public works project
unless all of the iron, steel, and
manufactured goods used in the project
is produced in the United States, or
unless a waiver is provided to the
recipient by the head of the appropriate
agency, here the EPA. A waiver may be
provided if EPA determines that (1)
Applying these requirements would be
inconsistent with the public interest; (2)
iron, steel, and the relevant
manufactured goods are not produced in
the United States in sufficient and
reasonably available quantities and of a
satisfactory quality; or (3) inclusion of
iron, steel, and the relevant
manufactured goods produced in the
United States will increase the cost of
the overall project by more than 25
percent.
The City of Columbia, MO is
proposing a wastewater treatment
facility (WWTF) improvement project
phase 1 that includes the use of a nondomestically manufactured Toshiba
LQ500 density analyzer. The Toshiba
LQ500 density analyzers measure the
density of the WWTF’s primary sludge
as a parameter for sludge waste process
control. The Toshiba LQ500 density
analyzer provides improved settling of
microbiological populations, provides
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Jan 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
improved nutrient removal, maintains
constant mass solids loading to
activated sludge thickeners, and reduces
variability of Total Solids (TS)
concentrations which results in a
considerable improvement of thickener
performance. Project specifications for a
density analyzer require the following to
meet the design and performance
criteria:
(1) The density analyzer shall consist
of an element and transmitter that
utilizes the microwave phase difference
method to determine the density of that
process fluid;
(2) The element shall consist of an
obstruction-less microwave source;
(3) The element shall mount, nonintrusively, in line with the process
piping using mounting hardware
furnished with the device;
(4) The element components shall be
rated for explosion proof service; and
(5) The transmitter shall be
microprocessor based, generate an
isolated 4–20 mA dc output
proportional to the process density, and
be provided in a NEMA 4 rated, wall
mounted enclosure.
The Clean Water State Revolving
Fund (CWSRF) staff has reviewed this
waiver request and has determined that
the supporting documentation provided
by the City of Columbia, MO establishes
both a proper basis to specify a
particular manufactured good, and that
there is no domestic manufactured good
currently available. The information
provided is sufficient to meet the
following criteria listed under Section
1605(b) of the ARRA and in the April
28, 2009 Memorandum: Iron, steel, and
the manufactured goods are not
produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available
quantities and of a satisfactory quality.
The LQ500 density/consistency
analyzer is manufactured nondomestically by the Toshiba
Corporation. The supporting
documentation and independent
research and communication with
manufacturers of in-line, non-intrusive
sludge density analytical process
analyzers conducted by EPA’s national
contractor demonstrate that there are no
U.S. manufacturers able to meet the
project specifications. None of the
companies contacted by EPA’s national
contractor manufacture their density
analytical instruments in the United
States.
EPA has also evaluated Columbia,
MO’s waiver request to determine if its
submission is considered late or if it
could be considered timely, as per the
OMB Guidance at 2 CFR 176.120. EPA
will generally regard waiver requests
with respect to components that were
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3137
specified in the bid solicitation or in a
general/primary construction contract as
‘‘late’’ if submitted after the contract
date. However, EPA could also
determine that a request be evaluated as
timely, though made after the date that
the contract was signed, if the need for
a waiver was not reasonably foreseeable.
If the need for a waiver is reasonably
foreseeable, then EPA could still apply
discretion in these late cases as per the
OMB Guidance, which says ‘‘the award
official may deny the request.’’ For those
waiver requests that do not have a
reasonably unforeseeable basis for
lateness, but for which the waiver basis
is valid and there is no apparent gain by
the ARRA recipient or loss on behalf of
the government, then EPA will still
consider granting a waiver.
In this case, there are no U.S.
manufacturers that meet Columbia,
MO’s project specification for the
density analyzer. The waiver request
was not made prior to the contract being
signed because initially the
manufacturer said their product was
substantially transformed in the U.S.;
however, Columbia, MO did not accept
this documentation. There is no
indication that Columbia, MO failed to
request a waiver in order to avoid the
requirements of the ARRA, particularly
since there are no domestically
manufactured products available that
meet the project specifications. EPA will
consider Columbia, MO’s waiver
request, a foreseeable late request, as
though it had been timely made since
there is no gain by Columbia, MO and
no loss by the government due to the
late request.
Furthermore, the purpose of the
ARRA is to stimulate economic recovery
by funding current infrastructure
construction, not to delay projects that
are ‘‘shovel ready’’ by requiring potential
SRF eligible recipients, such as the City
of Columbia, MO, to revise their design
standards and specifications as well as
their construction schedule. There are
no domestic manufacturers that can
provide density analyzers that meet the
specifications of this WWTF
improvement project. To delay this
construction would directly conflict
with a fundamental economic purpose
of ARRA, which is to create or retain
jobs.
The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ
Memorandum, ‘‘Implementation of Buy
American provisions of Public Law
111–5, the ‘American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009’ ’’
(‘‘Memorandum’’), defines reasonably
available quantity as ‘‘the quantity of
iron, steel, or relevant manufactured
good is available or will be available at
the time needed and place needed, and
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
3138
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 19, 2011 / Notices
in the proper form or specification as
specified in the project plans and
design.’’ The same Memorandum
defines ‘‘satisfactory quality’’ as ‘‘the
quality of steel, iron or manufactured
good specified in the project plans and
designs.’’
The March 31, 2009 Delegation of
Authority Memorandum provided
Regional Administrators with the
temporary authority to issue exceptions
to Section 1605 of the ARRA within the
geographic boundaries of their
respective regions and with respect to
requests by individual grant recipients.
Having established both a proper
basis to specify the particular
manufactured good required for this
project and that this manufactured good
was not available from a producer in the
United States, the City is hereby granted
a waiver from the Buy American
requirements of Section 1605(a) of
Public Law 111–5. This waiver permits
use of ARRA funds for the purchase of
a non-domestic manufactured Toshiba
LQ500 Density Analyzers documented
in City’s waiver request submittal dated
August 11, 2010. This supplementary
information constitutes the detailed
written justification required by Section
1605(c) for waivers based on a finding
under subsection (b).
Authority: Pub. L. 111–5, section 1605.
Dated: January 6, 2011.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2011–1018 Filed 1–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0014; FRL–8857–1]
Notice of Receipt of Requests To
Voluntarily Cancel Certain Pesticide
Registrations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with section
6(f)(1) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), as amended, EPA is issuing a
notice of receipt of requests by
registrants to voluntarily cancel certain
pesticide registrations. EPA intends to
grant these requests at the close of the
comment period for this announcement
unless the Agency receives substantive
comments within the comment period
that would merit its further review of
the requests, or unless the registrants
withdraw their requests. If these
requests are granted, any sale,
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:04 Jan 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
distribution, or use of products listed in
this notice will be permitted after the
registrations have been canceled only if
such sale, distribution, or use is
consistent with the terms as described
in the final order.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0014, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Submit written withdrawal request
by mail to: Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001. Attention:
Maia Tatinclaux.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–
0014. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maia Tatinclaux, Pesticide Reevaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 347–
0123; e-mail address:
tatinclaux.maia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, and
agricultural advocates; the chemical
industry; pesticide users; and members
of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. If you
have any questions regarding the
information in this notice, consult the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
E:\FR\FM\19JAN1.SGM
19JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3136-3138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1018]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R07-OW-2010-1084; FRL-9254-3]
Notice of a Regional Project Waiver of Section 1605 (Buy
American) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)
to the City of Columbia, MO
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is hereby granting a waiver of the Buy American
requirements of ARRA Section 1605 under the authority of Section
1605(b) (2) [manufactured goods are not produced in the United States
in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory
quality] to the City of Columbia, MO (``City'') for the purchase of two
(2) foreign manufactured Toshiba LQ500 Density Analyzers in Columbia,
Missouri. This is a project specific waiver and only applies to the use
of the specified product for the ARRA project being proposed. Any other
ARRA recipient that wishes to use the same product must apply for a
separate waiver based on project specific circumstances. Based upon
critical performance requirements and project specifications for the
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer, a list of potential manufacturers,
project schedule, and a price comparison worksheet of the different
manufacturers submitted by the City and its consulting engineer, it has
been determined that there are currently no domestically manufactured
density analyzers available to meet the City's project specifications.
The Regional Administrator is making this determination based on the
review and recommendations of the Clean Water
[[Page 3137]]
State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff. The Assistant Administrator of the
Office of Administration and Resources Management has concurred on this
decision to make an exception to Section 1605 of ARRA. This action
permits the purchase of two foreign manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density
analyzers. City of Columbia, MO has provided sufficient documentation
to support their waiver request.
DATES: Effective Date: January 6, 2011 .
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Simmons, Environmental
Engineer, Water Wetlands and Pesticides Division (WWPD), (913) 551-
7237, U.S. EPA Region 7, 901 N. Fifth Street, Kansas City, KS 66101.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with ARRA Section 1605(c), the
EPA hereby provides notice that it is granting a project waiver of the
requirements of Section 1605 (a) of Public Law 111-5, Buy American
requirements, to the City of Columbia, MO (``City'') for the purchase
of two non-domestically manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers,
to meet the City's design and performance specifications as part of its
proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility Phase 1 Improvement project in
Columbia, MO.
Section 1605 of the ARRA requires that none of the appropriated
funds may be used for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or
repair of a public building or a public works project unless all of the
iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project is produced in
the United States, or unless a waiver is provided to the recipient by
the head of the appropriate agency, here the EPA. A waiver may be
provided if EPA determines that (1) Applying these requirements would
be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) iron, steel, and the
relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory
quality; or (3) inclusion of iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured
goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the
overall project by more than 25 percent.
The City of Columbia, MO is proposing a wastewater treatment
facility (WWTF) improvement project phase 1 that includes the use of a
non-domestically manufactured Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer. The
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzers measure the density of the WWTF's
primary sludge as a parameter for sludge waste process control. The
Toshiba LQ500 density analyzer provides improved settling of
microbiological populations, provides improved nutrient removal,
maintains constant mass solids loading to activated sludge thickeners,
and reduces variability of Total Solids (TS) concentrations which
results in a considerable improvement of thickener performance. Project
specifications for a density analyzer require the following to meet the
design and performance criteria:
(1) The density analyzer shall consist of an element and
transmitter that utilizes the microwave phase difference method to
determine the density of that process fluid;
(2) The element shall consist of an obstruction-less microwave
source;
(3) The element shall mount, non-intrusively, in line with the
process piping using mounting hardware furnished with the device;
(4) The element components shall be rated for explosion proof
service; and
(5) The transmitter shall be microprocessor based, generate an
isolated 4-20 mA dc output proportional to the process density, and be
provided in a NEMA 4 rated, wall mounted enclosure.
The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) staff has reviewed
this waiver request and has determined that the supporting
documentation provided by the City of Columbia, MO establishes both a
proper basis to specify a particular manufactured good, and that there
is no domestic manufactured good currently available. The information
provided is sufficient to meet the following criteria listed under
Section 1605(b) of the ARRA and in the April 28, 2009 Memorandum: Iron,
steel, and the manufactured goods are not produced in the United States
in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory
quality.
The LQ500 density/consistency analyzer is manufactured non-
domestically by the Toshiba Corporation. The supporting documentation
and independent research and communication with manufacturers of in-
line, non-intrusive sludge density analytical process analyzers
conducted by EPA's national contractor demonstrate that there are no
U.S. manufacturers able to meet the project specifications. None of the
companies contacted by EPA's national contractor manufacture their
density analytical instruments in the United States.
EPA has also evaluated Columbia, MO's waiver request to determine
if its submission is considered late or if it could be considered
timely, as per the OMB Guidance at 2 CFR 176.120. EPA will generally
regard waiver requests with respect to components that were specified
in the bid solicitation or in a general/primary construction contract
as ``late'' if submitted after the contract date. However, EPA could
also determine that a request be evaluated as timely, though made after
the date that the contract was signed, if the need for a waiver was not
reasonably foreseeable. If the need for a waiver is reasonably
foreseeable, then EPA could still apply discretion in these late cases
as per the OMB Guidance, which says ``the award official may deny the
request.'' For those waiver requests that do not have a reasonably
unforeseeable basis for lateness, but for which the waiver basis is
valid and there is no apparent gain by the ARRA recipient or loss on
behalf of the government, then EPA will still consider granting a
waiver.
In this case, there are no U.S. manufacturers that meet Columbia,
MO's project specification for the density analyzer. The waiver request
was not made prior to the contract being signed because initially the
manufacturer said their product was substantially transformed in the
U.S.; however, Columbia, MO did not accept this documentation. There is
no indication that Columbia, MO failed to request a waiver in order to
avoid the requirements of the ARRA, particularly since there are no
domestically manufactured products available that meet the project
specifications. EPA will consider Columbia, MO's waiver request, a
foreseeable late request, as though it had been timely made since there
is no gain by Columbia, MO and no loss by the government due to the
late request.
Furthermore, the purpose of the ARRA is to stimulate economic
recovery by funding current infrastructure construction, not to delay
projects that are ``shovel ready'' by requiring potential SRF eligible
recipients, such as the City of Columbia, MO, to revise their design
standards and specifications as well as their construction schedule.
There are no domestic manufacturers that can provide density analyzers
that meet the specifications of this WWTF improvement project. To delay
this construction would directly conflict with a fundamental economic
purpose of ARRA, which is to create or retain jobs.
The April 28, 2009 EPA HQ Memorandum, ``Implementation of Buy
American provisions of Public Law 111-5, the `American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009' '' (``Memorandum''), defines reasonably
available quantity as ``the quantity of iron, steel, or relevant
manufactured good is available or will be available at the time needed
and place needed, and
[[Page 3138]]
in the proper form or specification as specified in the project plans
and design.'' The same Memorandum defines ``satisfactory quality'' as
``the quality of steel, iron or manufactured good specified in the
project plans and designs.''
The March 31, 2009 Delegation of Authority Memorandum provided
Regional Administrators with the temporary authority to issue
exceptions to Section 1605 of the ARRA within the geographic boundaries
of their respective regions and with respect to requests by individual
grant recipients.
Having established both a proper basis to specify the particular
manufactured good required for this project and that this manufactured
good was not available from a producer in the United States, the City
is hereby granted a waiver from the Buy American requirements of
Section 1605(a) of Public Law 111-5. This waiver permits use of ARRA
funds for the purchase of a non-domestic manufactured Toshiba LQ500
Density Analyzers documented in City's waiver request submittal dated
August 11, 2010. This supplementary information constitutes the
detailed written justification required by Section 1605(c) for waivers
based on a finding under subsection (b).
Authority: Pub. L. 111-5, section 1605.
Dated: January 6, 2011.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2011-1018 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P