Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER Series Airplanes, 2840-2842 [2011-862]
Download as PDF
2840
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 11
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1313; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–158–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, –900, and –900ER Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800,
–900, and –900ER series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require inspecting
to determine the clearance and any wire
bundle damage between wire bundle
W443 and the left forward rudder
quadrant, followed by adjusting the
minimum clearance between the wire
bundle and the left forward rudder
quadrant, and repairing any wire bundle
damage. This proposed AD results from
reports of contact between wire bundle
W443 and the left forward rudder
quadrant. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct contact between the
wire bundle and the left forward rudder
quadrant. Damage to the wire bundle
could result in uncommanded stabilizer
trim and autopilot disconnects due to
shorted wires from contact between the
wire bundle and the left forward rudder
quadrant, potentially affecting the
capability of the flight crew during high
work load and consequently reducing
control of the airplane. Restricted free
movement of the rudder quadrant at full
right rudder travel would reduce
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6409; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2010–1313; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–158–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
ADDRESSES
Discussion
We have received reports of
interference between the left forward
rudder quadrant and wire bundle W443
during full right rudder travel. This
condition was found on an airplane
during a pre-flight check when a pilot
reported interference during full-right
rudder travel. Twenty airplanes out of
32 that were inspected were found to
have non-conforming installations for
wire bundle W443, which increase the
likelihood for interference during full
right rudder movement. Investigation
showed that while the interference
condition was not present on the 20
airplanes, the wire bundle was installed
with too much slack between clamps.
Restricted control surface movement
can occur from insufficient clearance
between the wire bundle and the left
forward rudder quadrant, and if the wire
bundle is damaged, uncommanded
stabilizer or autopilot disconnects could
occur due to shorted wires from contact
between the wire bundle and the left
forward rudder quadrant, potentially
affecting the capability of the flight crew
during high work load and consequently
reducing control of the airplane.
Restricted free movement of the rudder
quadrant at full right rudder travel, if
not corrected, would reduce
controllability of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–
1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010.
The service bulletin describes
procedures for a detailed inspection of
wire bundle W443 for damage and
repairing any damage, and measuring
and adjusting the minimum clearance
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
2841
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
between the wire bundle and the left
forward rudder quadrant.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design. This proposed AD would
require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information
described previously
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 870 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The following table provides
the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD.
TABLE—ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Inspection .............................................................................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Average labor
rate per hour
Work-hours
Jkt 223001
2
$85
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2010–1313; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NM–158–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 4,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing
Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, –900, and –900ER series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737–27–1282, Revision 1, dated June 14,
2010.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27: Flight controls.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of contact
between wire bundle W443 and the left
forward rudder quadrant. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct contact between
the wire bundle and the left forward rudder
quadrant. Damage to the wire bundle could
result in uncommanded stabilizer trim and
autopilot disconnects due to shorted wires
from contact between the wire bundle and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per
product
$170
Number
of U.S.registered
airplanes
870
Fleet cost
$147,900
the left forward rudder quadrant, potentially
affecting the capability of the flight crew
during high work load and consequently
reducing control of the airplane. Restricted
free movement of the rudder quadrant at full
right rudder travel would reduce
controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Wire Bundle W443 Inspection and Clearance
Measurement
(g) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of
wire bundle W443 for damage and measure
for sufficient clearance in accordance with
Part 1 of the Work Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–
1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010. If the
wire bundle is undamaged, and sufficient
clearance exists, no further action is required
by this AD.
Wire Bundle W443 Undamaged: Clearance
Adjustment
(h) If the clearance of wire bundle W443
in the inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD is found to be insufficient, before
further flight adjust the wire bundle
clearance in accordance with Part 2 of the
Work Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–1282,
Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010.
Wire Bundle W443 Damaged: Repair, and
Clearance Adjustment
(i) If wire bundle W443 is found to be
damaged in the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, before further flight
repair the damaged wire bundle and adjust
the wire bundle clearance in accordance with
Part 3 of the Work Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–
1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(j) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737–27–1282, dated March 15, 2007, are
considered acceptable for compliance with
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
2842
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the corresponding action specified in this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dean
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and
Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6409; fax (425) 917–6590. Information
may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACOAMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington on January
10, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–862 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1303; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–049–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France (Eurocopter) Model SA–365N,
SA–365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and
SA–366G1 Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified Eurocopter model helicopters.
This proposed AD would require an
initial and recurring inspections of the
inner angles and flanges of the 9-degree
frame on the right-hand (RH) and lefthand (LH) sides for a crack. If a crack
is found, this proposed AD would
require, before further flight, repairing
the frame. This proposed AD is
prompted by the discovery of a crack in
the 9-degree frame of a Eurocopter
Model AS–365N2 helicopter. These
cracks could also develop on the other
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
specified model helicopters because
they contain the same 9-degree frame.
The actions specified by this proposed
AD are intended to detect a crack in the
9-degree frame to prevent loss of
structural integrity and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75053–
4005, telephone (800) 232–0323, fax
(972) 641–3710, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com.
You may examine the comments to
this proposed AD in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Policy Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817)
222–5130, fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the caption
ADDRESSES. Include the Docket No.
‘‘FAA–2010–1303, Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–049–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function
of the docket Web site, you can find and
read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent or signed the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
West Building at the street address
stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued Emergency AD
No. 2010–0064–E, dated April 1, 2010,
which supersedes EASA Emergency AD
No. 2009–0125–E, dated June 12, 2009,
and the correction dated June 15, 2009,
to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified model helicopters. EASA
advises that during a major inspection a
crack was found in the 9-degree frame
of an AS–365N2 helicopter, which had
logged a total of 10,786 flight hours. The
crack was located 230 millimeters above
the cabin floor and had grown over a
large section of the 9-degree frame on
the RH side. EASA states that analysis
shows that the time required for
initiation of a crack in this area varies
according to the weight and balance
data of the different aircraft versions.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin (EASB), Revision
1, dated March 31, 2010, containing the
following three numbers: No. 05.00.57
for FAA type-certificated Model SA–
365N, N1 and AS–365N2 and N3
helicopters and for military, not FAA
type-certificated, Model AS365F, Fs, Fi,
and K helicopters; No. 05.00.25 for
military, not FAA type-certificated,
Model AS565AA, MA, MB, SA, SB, and
UB helicopters; and No. 05.39 for FAA
type-certificated Model SA–366G1
helicopters and for military, not FAA
type-certificated, Model SA366GA
helicopters. The EASB specifies
checking at regular intervals for a crack
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2840-2842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-862]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 2840]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1313; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-158-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700,
-700C, -800, -900, and -900ER Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series
airplanes. This proposed AD would require inspecting to determine the
clearance and any wire bundle damage between wire bundle W443 and the
left forward rudder quadrant, followed by adjusting the minimum
clearance between the wire bundle and the left forward rudder quadrant,
and repairing any wire bundle damage. This proposed AD results from
reports of contact between wire bundle W443 and the left forward rudder
quadrant. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct contact
between the wire bundle and the left forward rudder quadrant. Damage to
the wire bundle could result in uncommanded stabilizer trim and
autopilot disconnects due to shorted wires from contact between the
wire bundle and the left forward rudder quadrant, potentially affecting
the capability of the flight crew during high work load and
consequently reducing control of the airplane. Restricted free movement
of the rudder quadrant at full right rudder travel would reduce
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 917-6409; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1313;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-158-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of interference between the left forward
rudder quadrant and wire bundle W443 during full right rudder travel.
This condition was found on an airplane during a pre-flight check when
a pilot reported interference during full-right rudder travel. Twenty
airplanes out of 32 that were inspected were found to have non-
conforming installations for wire bundle W443, which increase the
likelihood for interference during full right rudder movement.
Investigation showed that while the interference condition was not
present on the 20 airplanes, the wire bundle was installed with too
much slack between clamps. Restricted control surface movement can
occur from insufficient clearance between the wire bundle and the left
forward rudder quadrant, and if the wire bundle is damaged, uncommanded
stabilizer or autopilot disconnects could occur due to shorted wires
from contact between the wire bundle and the left forward rudder
quadrant, potentially affecting the capability of the flight crew
during high work load and consequently reducing control of the
airplane. Restricted free movement of the rudder quadrant at full right
rudder travel, if not corrected, would reduce controllability of the
airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-27-
1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010. The service bulletin describes
procedures for a detailed inspection of wire bundle W443 for damage and
repairing any damage, and measuring and adjusting the minimum clearance
[[Page 2841]]
between the wire bundle and the left forward rudder quadrant.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described previously
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 870 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.
Table--Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Average labor Cost per U.S.-
Action Work-hours rate per hour product registered Fleet cost
airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection...................... 2 $85 $170 870 $147,900
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-1313; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-158-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 4, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-27-1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from reports of contact between wire bundle
W443 and the left forward rudder quadrant. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct contact between the wire bundle and the left
forward rudder quadrant. Damage to the wire bundle could result in
uncommanded stabilizer trim and autopilot disconnects due to shorted
wires from contact between the wire bundle and the left forward
rudder quadrant, potentially affecting the capability of the flight
crew during high work load and consequently reducing control of the
airplane. Restricted free movement of the rudder quadrant at full
right rudder travel would reduce controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Wire Bundle W443 Inspection and Clearance Measurement
(g) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of wire bundle W443 for damage and measure for
sufficient clearance in accordance with Part 1 of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-27-
1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010. If the wire bundle is
undamaged, and sufficient clearance exists, no further action is
required by this AD.
Wire Bundle W443 Undamaged: Clearance Adjustment
(h) If the clearance of wire bundle W443 in the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD is found to be insufficient,
before further flight adjust the wire bundle clearance in accordance
with Part 2 of the Work Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-27-1282, Revision 1, dated June 14, 2010.
Wire Bundle W443 Damaged: Repair, and Clearance Adjustment
(i) If wire bundle W443 is found to be damaged in the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, before further flight repair
the damaged wire bundle and adjust the wire bundle clearance in
accordance with Part 3 of the Work Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-27-1282, Revision 1, dated June 14,
2010.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(j) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-27-
1282, dated March 15, 2007, are considered acceptable for compliance
with
[[Page 2842]]
the corresponding action specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Dean Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment
Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6409; fax (425) 917-6590.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington on January 10, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-862 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P