Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA-366G1 Helicopters, 2842-2845 [2011-720]
Download as PDF
2842
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the corresponding action specified in this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dean
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and
Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6409; fax (425) 917–6590. Information
may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACOAMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington on January
10, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–862 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–1303; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–049–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
France (Eurocopter) Model SA–365N,
SA–365N1, AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and
SA–366G1 Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified Eurocopter model helicopters.
This proposed AD would require an
initial and recurring inspections of the
inner angles and flanges of the 9-degree
frame on the right-hand (RH) and lefthand (LH) sides for a crack. If a crack
is found, this proposed AD would
require, before further flight, repairing
the frame. This proposed AD is
prompted by the discovery of a crack in
the 9-degree frame of a Eurocopter
Model AS–365N2 helicopter. These
cracks could also develop on the other
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
specified model helicopters because
they contain the same 9-degree frame.
The actions specified by this proposed
AD are intended to detect a crack in the
9-degree frame to prevent loss of
structural integrity and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701
Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75053–
4005, telephone (800) 232–0323, fax
(972) 641–3710, or at https://
www.eurocopter.com.
You may examine the comments to
this proposed AD in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and
Policy Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817)
222–5130, fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the caption
ADDRESSES. Include the Docket No.
‘‘FAA–2010–1303, Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–049–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function
of the docket Web site, you can find and
read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent or signed the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
West Building at the street address
stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued Emergency AD
No. 2010–0064–E, dated April 1, 2010,
which supersedes EASA Emergency AD
No. 2009–0125–E, dated June 12, 2009,
and the correction dated June 15, 2009,
to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified model helicopters. EASA
advises that during a major inspection a
crack was found in the 9-degree frame
of an AS–365N2 helicopter, which had
logged a total of 10,786 flight hours. The
crack was located 230 millimeters above
the cabin floor and had grown over a
large section of the 9-degree frame on
the RH side. EASA states that analysis
shows that the time required for
initiation of a crack in this area varies
according to the weight and balance
data of the different aircraft versions.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin (EASB), Revision
1, dated March 31, 2010, containing the
following three numbers: No. 05.00.57
for FAA type-certificated Model SA–
365N, N1 and AS–365N2 and N3
helicopters and for military, not FAA
type-certificated, Model AS365F, Fs, Fi,
and K helicopters; No. 05.00.25 for
military, not FAA type-certificated,
Model AS565AA, MA, MB, SA, SB, and
UB helicopters; and No. 05.39 for FAA
type-certificated Model SA–366G1
helicopters and for military, not FAA
type-certificated, Model SA366GA
helicopters. The EASB specifies
checking at regular intervals for a crack
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
2843
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
in the areas of the inner angles and
flanges of the 9° frame on the RH and
LH sides, near the splice. The EASB
states that Eurocopter is currently
studying an improvement
(reinforcement) of the frame, which will
cancel the checks specified by the
EASB. EASA classified this EASB as
mandatory and issued AD No. 2010–
0064–E, dated April 1, 2010, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these
helicopters.
FAA’s Evaluation and Unsafe Condition
Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of France and
are approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with France, EASA, their
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in
their AD. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs. This proposed
AD would require an initial and
recurring inspections of the inner angles
and flanges of the 9-degree frame on the
RH and LH sides for a crack. If a crack
is found, this proposed AD would
require, before further flight, repairing
the frame.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
We refer to ‘‘flight hours’’ as ‘‘hours
time-in-service.’’ We do not refer to the
EASB for accomplishment instructions.
We do not require contacting the
manufacturer for approved repair
instructions. We do not allow flight
with a known crack. Therefore, we do
not revise our required action based on
the length and specific location of the
crack on the 9-degree frame. We refer to
the 9-degree frame rather than the No.
9 frame.
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 19 helicopters of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 3 work hours for about 12
inspections a year per helicopter. It
would take about 24 hours to repair a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
helicopter frame. The average labor rate
is $85 per work hour. Required parts
would cost about $3,350. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost
impact of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $68,920 for the fleet,
assuming 2 helicopters require repair
each year.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. Additionally, this proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the AD docket to
examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA–2010–
1303; Directorate Identifier 2010–SW–
049–AD
Applicability: Model SA–365N, SA–365N1,
AS–365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA–366G1
helicopters, certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated.
To detect a crack in the 9-degree frame to
prevent loss of structural integrity and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter,
do the following:
(a) On or before the affected model
helicopters reach the hours time-in-service
(TIS) listed in Table 1 of this AD or within
10 hours TIS, whichever occurs later, unless
accomplished previously, and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS, using
a 10X or higher magnifying glass, inspect the
inner angles and flanges of the 9-degree
fuselage frame on the right hand and left
hand sides for a crack in the area depicted
in Figure 1 and as shown in Figure 2 of this
AD.
TABLE 1
Helicopter model
SA–365N ..............................
SA–365N1 ............................
AS–365N2 ............................
AS 365 N3 ............................
SA–366G1 ............................
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Hours TIS
8,990
9,990
3,190
2,090
9,990
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
EP18JA11.000
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
2844
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Note 1: Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin, Revision 1, dated March 31,
2010 (EASB), containing the following 3
numbers: No. 05.00.57 for FAA typecertificated Model SA–365N and N1 and AS–
365N2 and N3 helicopters and for military,
not FAA type-certificated, Model AS365F,
Fs, Fi, and K helicopters; No. 05.00.25 for
military, not FAA type-certificated, Model
AS565AA, MA, MB, SA, SB, and UB
helicopters; and No. 05.39 for FAA typecertificated Model SA–366G1 helicopters and
for military, not FAA type-certificated, Model
SA366GA helicopters. This EASB is not
incorporated by reference but contains
additional information about the subject of
this AD. Actions previously done by
following the procedures of this EASB are
considered acceptable for complying with the
corresponding actions in paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this AD.
(b) If you find a crack, before further flight,
repair the frame. Repairing a frame does not
constitute terminating action for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
repetitive inspection requirements of this
AD.
(c) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Safety
Management Group, FAA, ATTN: Gary
Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations
and Policy Group 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort
Worth, Texas, 76137; telephone: (817) 222–
5130 fax: 817–222–5961, for information
about previously approved alternative
methods of compliance.
(d) The Joint Aircraft System/Component
(JASC) Code is 5311: Fuselage Main, Frame.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed
in European Aviation Safety Agency AD No.
2010–0064–E, dated April 1, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on December
16, 2010.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–720 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
EP18JA11.001
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with PROPOSALS-1
BILLING CODE 4910–13–C
2845
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 2842-2845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-720]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2010-1303; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-049-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model
SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA-366G1 Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified Eurocopter model helicopters. This proposed AD would require
an initial and recurring inspections of the inner angles and flanges of
the 9-degree frame on the right-hand (RH) and left-hand (LH) sides for
a crack. If a crack is found, this proposed AD would require, before
further flight, repairing the frame. This proposed AD is prompted by
the discovery of a crack in the 9-degree frame of a Eurocopter Model
AS-365N2 helicopter. These cracks could also develop on the other
specified model helicopters because they contain the same 9-degree
frame. The actions specified by this proposed AD are intended to detect
a crack in the 9-degree frame to prevent loss of structural integrity
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie,
TX 75053-4005, telephone (800) 232-0323, fax (972) 641-3710, or at
https://www.eurocopter.com.
You may examine the comments to this proposed AD in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Policy Group, 2601 Meacham
Blvd, Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone (817) 222-5130, fax (817) 222-
5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the caption ADDRESSES. Include the Docket No. ``FAA-2010-
1303, Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-049-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Using the
search function of the docket Web site, you can find and read the
comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual
who sent or signed the comment. You may review the DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in person at the Docket Operations
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued
Emergency AD No. 2010-0064-E, dated April 1, 2010, which supersedes
EASA Emergency AD No. 2009-0125-E, dated June 12, 2009, and the
correction dated June 15, 2009, to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified model helicopters. EASA advises that during a major
inspection a crack was found in the 9-degree frame of an AS-365N2
helicopter, which had logged a total of 10,786 flight hours. The crack
was located 230 millimeters above the cabin floor and had grown over a
large section of the 9-degree frame on the RH side. EASA states that
analysis shows that the time required for initiation of a crack in this
area varies according to the weight and balance data of the different
aircraft versions.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB),
Revision 1, dated March 31, 2010, containing the following three
numbers: No. 05.00.57 for FAA type-certificated Model SA-365N, N1 and
AS-365N2 and N3 helicopters and for military, not FAA type-
certificated, Model AS365F, Fs, Fi, and K helicopters; No. 05.00.25 for
military, not FAA type-certificated, Model AS565AA, MA, MB, SA, SB, and
UB helicopters; and No. 05.39 for FAA type-certificated Model SA-366G1
helicopters and for military, not FAA type-certificated, Model SA366GA
helicopters. The EASB specifies checking at regular intervals for a
crack
[[Page 2843]]
in the areas of the inner angles and flanges of the 9[deg] frame on the
RH and LH sides, near the splice. The EASB states that Eurocopter is
currently studying an improvement (reinforcement) of the frame, which
will cancel the checks specified by the EASB. EASA classified this EASB
as mandatory and issued AD No. 2010-0064-E, dated April 1, 2010, to
ensure the continued airworthiness of these helicopters.
FAA's Evaluation and Unsafe Condition Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, their technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
their AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same type
designs. This proposed AD would require an initial and recurring
inspections of the inner angles and flanges of the 9-degree frame on
the RH and LH sides for a crack. If a crack is found, this proposed AD
would require, before further flight, repairing the frame.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
We refer to ``flight hours'' as ``hours time-in-service.'' We do
not refer to the EASB for accomplishment instructions. We do not
require contacting the manufacturer for approved repair instructions.
We do not allow flight with a known crack. Therefore, we do not revise
our required action based on the length and specific location of the
crack on the 9-degree frame. We refer to the 9-degree frame rather than
the No. 9 frame.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 19 helicopters of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 3 work hours
for about 12 inspections a year per helicopter. It would take about 24
hours to repair a helicopter frame. The average labor rate is $85 per
work hour. Required parts would cost about $3,350. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $68,920 for the fleet, assuming 2 helicopters require
repair each year.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. Additionally, this proposed
AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic
evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA-2010-1303; Directorate Identifier
2010-SW-049-AD
Applicability: Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, and
SA-366G1 helicopters, certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated.
To detect a crack in the 9-degree frame to prevent loss of
structural integrity and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, do the following:
(a) On or before the affected model helicopters reach the hours
time-in-service (TIS) listed in Table 1 of this AD or within 10
hours TIS, whichever occurs later, unless accomplished previously,
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS, using a 10X
or higher magnifying glass, inspect the inner angles and flanges of
the 9-degree fuselage frame on the right hand and left hand sides
for a crack in the area depicted in Figure 1 and as shown in Figure
2 of this AD.
Table 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helicopter model Hours TIS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SA-365N................................................. 8,990
SA-365N1................................................ 9,990
AS-365N2................................................ 3,190
AS 365 N3............................................... 2,090
SA-366G1................................................ 9,990
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 2844]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP18JA11.000
[[Page 2845]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP18JA11.001
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
Note 1: Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin, Revision 1,
dated March 31, 2010 (EASB), containing the following 3 numbers: No.
05.00.57 for FAA type-certificated Model SA-365N and N1 and AS-365N2
and N3 helicopters and for military, not FAA type-certificated,
Model AS365F, Fs, Fi, and K helicopters; No. 05.00.25 for military,
not FAA type-certificated, Model AS565AA, MA, MB, SA, SB, and UB
helicopters; and No. 05.39 for FAA type-certificated Model SA-366G1
helicopters and for military, not FAA type-certificated, Model
SA366GA helicopters. This EASB is not incorporated by reference but
contains additional information about the subject of this AD.
Actions previously done by following the procedures of this EASB are
considered acceptable for complying with the corresponding actions
in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD.
(b) If you find a crack, before further flight, repair the
frame. Repairing a frame does not constitute terminating action for
the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.
(c) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, ATTN: Gary Roach,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and Policy Group 2601 Meacham
Blvd, Fort Worth, Texas, 76137; telephone: (817) 222-5130 fax: 817-
222-5961, for information about previously approved alternative
methods of compliance.
(d) The Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code is 5311:
Fuselage Main, Frame.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2010-0064-E, dated April 1, 2010.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on December 16, 2010.
M. Monica Merritt,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-720 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P