Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Adoption of 8-hour Ozone Standard and Related Reference Conditions, and Update of Appendices, 2829-2832 [2011-487]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend 33 CFR 165.921 by staying
paragraphs (d)–(h) from midnight
January 15, 2011 to midnight January
15, 2013.
■
Dated: January 7, 2011.
Michael N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–852 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–1138]
Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan Including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, and
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel,
Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of Enforcement of
Regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon
Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 daily from 7 a.m. through
11 a.m. and from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on
January 18–22, 2011; January 24–26,
2011; January 31, 2011; February 1–5,
2011; February 7–12, 2011; and on
February 14–19, 2011. This enforcement
action will also occur from 7 a.m. on
January 27, 2011 through 7 a.m. on
January 29, 2011. This action is
necessary to protect the waterways,
waterway users, and vessels from
hazards associated with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers’ operational and
safety testing of the dispersal barrier IIB,
which helps control the spread of
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:37 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
aquatic nuisance species that have the
potential of devastating the waters of the
Great Lakes.
During the enforcement period, entry
into, transiting, mooring, laying-up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.T09.0166 will be enforced from
7 a.m. on January 18, 2011 through
5 p.m. on February 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or e-mail CDR Tim Cummins, Deputy
Prevention Division, Ninth Coast Guard
District, telephone 216–902–6045, email address
Timothy.M.Cummins@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce a segment of the
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL,
listed in 33 CFR § 165.T09–0166, on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 daily from 7 a.m. to
11 a.m. and from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on
January 18–22, 2011; January 24–26,
2011; January 31, 2011; February 1–5,
2011; February 7–12, 2011; and on
February 14–19, 2011. This enforcement
action will also occur from 7 a.m. on
January 27, 2011 until 7 a.m. on January
29, 2011.
This enforcement action is necessary
because the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan has determined that the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ dispersal
barrier IIB operational testing poses
risks to life and property. The
combination of vessel traffic and electric
current in the water makes the
controlling of vessels through the
impacted portion of the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal necessary to
prevent injury and property loss.
In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, mooring, laying up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her designated
representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.T09–0166 and 5 U.S.C.
552(a). In addition to this notice in the
Federal Register, the Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan, will also
provide notice through other means,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2829
which may include, but are not limited
to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local
Notice to Mariners, local news media,
distribution in leaflet form, and onscene oral notice. Additionally, the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, may notify representatives
from the maritime industry through
telephonic and e-mail notifications.
Dated: December 29, 2010.
S.R. Schenk,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2011–851 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0881; FRL–9251–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Adoption of 8-hour Ozone Standard
and Related Reference Conditions, and
Update of Appendices
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the
Commonwealth of Virginia State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision
adds the 2008 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) and
related reference conditions and
updates the list of appendices under
‘‘Documents Incorporated by Reference.’’
Virginia’s SIP revision for the NAAQS
for ozone is consistent with the 8-hour
Federal standard. This action is being
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on March
21, 2011 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
by February 17, 2011. If EPA receives
such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2010–0881 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0881,
Marilyn Powers, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program
Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
2830
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–
0881. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://www.
regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://www.
regulations.gov or in hard copy during
normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:37 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 27, 2010, the
Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP
revision amends the existing SIP to add
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and
related reference conditions.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) specifies
that EPA must reevaluate the
appropriateness of each of the NAAQS
every five years. As part of the process,
EPA reviewed the latest health-based
research and determined that a revised
NAAQS for ozone was necessary to
protect public health. EPA revised the 8hour standard to a level of 0.075 parts
per million (ppm) to provide increased
protection for children and other ‘‘at
risk’’ populations against an array of
ozone-related adverse health effects.
EPA promulgated this more stringent
NAAQS for ozone on March 27, 2008
(73 FR 16436).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On September 27, 2010, the
Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP
revision consists of an amendment
which includes the revised ambient air
quality standard for ozone, and related
reference conditions. Virginia’s revision
incorporates the Federal 8-hour ozone
NAAQS into the Code of Virginia
(9VAC5 Chapter 30). In addition, the list
of appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 is being
updated under documents incorporated
by reference (9VAC5–20–21).
The following are the specific sections
that are being modified or added:
• 9VAC5–20–21: Documents
incorporated by reference (modified).
• 9VAC5–30–55: Ozone (8-hour, 0.08
ppm) (modified).
• 9VAC5–30–56: Ozone (8-hour,
0.075 ppm) (added).
III. General Information Pertaining to
SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
that provides for, subject to certain
conditions, an environmental
assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for
voluntary compliance evaluations
performed by a regulated entity. The
legislation further addresses the relative
burden of proof for parties either
asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the
privilege is claimed. Virginia’s
legislation also provides, subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
certain conditions, for a penalty waiver
for violations of environmental laws
when a regulated entity discovers such
violations pursuant to a voluntary
compliance evaluation and voluntarily
discloses such violations to the
Commonwealth and takes prompt and
appropriate measures to remedy the
violations. Virginia’s Voluntary
Environmental Assessment Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides
a privilege that protects from disclosure
documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the
product of a voluntary environmental
assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information (1)
that are generated or developed before
the commencement of a voluntary
environmental assessment; (2) that are
prepared independently of the
assessment process; (3) that demonstrate
a clear, imminent and substantial
danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) that are required by
law.
On January 12, 1998, the
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal
opinion that states that the Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198,
precludes granting a privilege to
documents and information ‘‘required
by law,’’ including documents and
information ‘‘required by Federal law to
maintain program delegation,
authorization or approval,’’ since
Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally
authorized environmental programs in a
manner that is no less stringent than
their Federal counterparts. * * *’’ The
opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding
§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or
criminal enforcement under one of these
programs could not be privileged
because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing
enforcement in a manner required by
Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval.’’
Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code
Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the
extent consistent with requirements
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person
making a voluntary disclosure of
information to a State agency regarding
a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative
order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998
opinion states that the quoted language
renders this statute inapplicable to
enforcement of any Federally authorized
programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or
criminal penalties because granting
such immunity would not be consistent
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
with Federal law, which is one of the
criteria for immunity.’’
Therefore, EPA has determined that
Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the
Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal
requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a State
audit privilege and immunity law can
affect only State enforcement and
cannot have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at
any time invoke its authority under the
CAA, including, for example, sections
113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the
requirements or prohibitions of the State
plan, independently of any State
enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the
CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or
any, State audit privilege or immunity
law.
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Virginia’s SIP
revisions for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
and related reference conditions, as well
as the updated list of appendices to 40
CFR part 51 under ‘‘Documents
Incorporated by Reference.’’ EPA is
publishing this rule without prior
proposal because the Agency views this
as a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipates no adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, EPA
is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on
March 21, 2011 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by February 17, 2011. If EPA receives
adverse comment, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:37 Jan 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2831
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 21, 2011.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action
pertaining to Virginia’s adoption of the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075
parts per million (ppm) and related
reference conditions may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
2832
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Subpart VV—Virginia
2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
Section 5–30–55 and by adding the
entry for Section 5–30–56. The table in
paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ‘‘Documents Incorporated by
■
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Reference’’ after the ninth existing entry
for ‘‘Documents Incorporated by
Reference.’’ The amendments read as
follows:
§ 52.2420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State citation
State effective date
Title/subject
*
*
*
9 VAC 5, Chapter 30
*
*
Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III]
*
5–30–55 ............................
*
*
*
Ozone (8-hour, 0.08 ppm) .........................................
*
6/24/09
5–30–56 ............................
Ozone (8-hour, 0.075 ppm) .......................................
6/24/09
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
Documents Incorporated by Reference (9 VAC 5–
20–21, Sections B and E.1.).
*
Statewide ........................
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60 and 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0051; EPA–HQ–OAR–
2007–0877; FRL–9253–4]
WReier-Aviles on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with RULES
RIN 2060–AQ59
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry and Standards of
Performance for Portland Cement
Plants
*
*
Revised section.
Added section.
*
*
9/27/10
Jkt 223001
The EPA is taking direct final
action on amendments to the National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) from the Portland
Cement Manufacturing Industry and
Standards of Performance (NSPS) for
Portland Cement Plants. The final rules
were published on September 9, 2010.
This direct final action amends certain
regulatory text to clarify compliance
dates and clarifies that the previously
issued emission limits that were
changed in the September 9, 2010,
action remain in effect until sources are
required to comply with the revised
limits. We are also correcting two minor
typographical errors in the regulatory
text to the September 9, 2010 action.
The direct final rule is effective
on March 21, 2011, without further
notice, unless EPA receives significant
adverse written comment by February
17, 2011, or if a public hearing is
requested by February 2, 2011. If
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
EPA approval date
Additional
explanation
*
1/18/11 [Insert page number where the document begins].
*
Revised sections.
*
DATES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct Final rule; amendments.
AGENCY:
13:37 Jan 14, 2011
*
State submittal date
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2011–487 Filed 1–14–11; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Explanation
[former SIP
citation]
*
Applicable geographic
area
*
*
*
1/18/11 [Insert page number where the document begins].
1/18/11 [Insert page number where the document begins].
*
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
*
EPA approval date
Sfmt 4700
*
*
significant adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
clarifying which provisions will become
effective and which provisions are being
withdrawn due to adverse comment.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2002–0051, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–9744.
• Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send
comments to: EPA Docket Center
(6102T), National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutant From the
Portland Cement Manufacturing
Industry Docket, Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2002–0051, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Please include a total of two
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2829-2832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-487]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0881; FRL-9251-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Adoption of 8-hour Ozone Standard and Related Reference
Conditions, and Update of Appendices
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the
Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision
adds the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) and related reference
conditions and updates the list of appendices under ``Documents
Incorporated by Reference.'' Virginia's SIP revision for the NAAQS for
ozone is consistent with the 8-hour Federal standard. This action is
being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 21, 2011 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by February 17, 2011. If
EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2010-0881 by one of the following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0881, Marilyn Powers, Acting Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
[[Page 2830]]
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2010-0881. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 27, 2010, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP revision amends the existing SIP to
add the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and related reference conditions.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) specifies that EPA must reevaluate the
appropriateness of each of the NAAQS every five years. As part of the
process, EPA reviewed the latest health-based research and determined
that a revised NAAQS for ozone was necessary to protect public health.
EPA revised the 8-hour standard to a level of 0.075 parts per million
(ppm) to provide increased protection for children and other ``at
risk'' populations against an array of ozone-related adverse health
effects. EPA promulgated this more stringent NAAQS for ozone on March
27, 2008 (73 FR 16436).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On September 27, 2010, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP revision consists of an amendment
which includes the revised ambient air quality standard for ozone, and
related reference conditions. Virginia's revision incorporates the
Federal 8-hour ozone NAAQS into the Code of Virginia (9VAC5 Chapter
30). In addition, the list of appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 is being
updated under documents incorporated by reference (9VAC5-20-21).
The following are the specific sections that are being modified or
added:
9VAC5-20-21: Documents incorporated by reference
(modified).
9VAC5-30-55: Ozone (8-hour, 0.08 ppm) (modified).
9VAC5-30-56: Ozone (8-hour, 0.075 ppm) (added).
III. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides for, subject to
certain conditions, an environmental assessment (audit) ``privilege''
for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a regulated entity.
The legislation further addresses the relative burden of proof for
parties either asserting the privilege or seeking disclosure of
documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's legislation
also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty waiver for
violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity discovers such
violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation and
voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-
1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and
information about the content of those documents that are the product
of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information (1) that are generated or developed
before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
that are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that
demonstrate a clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public
health or environment; or (4) that are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the
Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts. * * *'' The opinion
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec. 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or
approval.''
Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that
``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a
State agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12,
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent
[[Page 2831]]
with Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.''
Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and
Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a State audit privilege and immunity law
can affect only State enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under
the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to
enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the State plan,
independently of any State enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by
this, or any, State audit privilege or immunity law.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Virginia's SIP revisions for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
and related reference conditions, as well as the updated list of
appendices to 40 CFR part 51 under ``Documents Incorporated by
Reference.'' EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
today's Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse
comments are filed. This rule will be effective on March 21, 2011
without further notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by February
17, 2011. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 21, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action pertaining to Virginia's adoption
of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) and
related reference conditions may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
[[Page 2832]]
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for Section 5-30-55 and by adding the entry for Section 5-30-
56. The table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an entry for
``Documents Incorporated by Reference'' after the ninth existing entry
for ``Documents Incorporated by Reference.'' The amendments read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Epa-Approved Virginia Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation [former SIP
date citation]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
9 VAC 5, Chapter 30 Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
5-30-55........................ Ozone (8-hour, 0.08 6/24/09 1/18/11 [Insert Revised section.
ppm). page number
where the
document begins].
5-30-56........................ Ozone (8-hour, 0.075 6/24/09 1/18/11 [Insert Added section.
ppm). page number
where the
document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable submittal EPA approval date Additional explanation
revision geographic area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Documents Incorporated by Statewide......... 9/27/10 1/18/11 [Insert Revised sections.
Reference (9 VAC 5-20-21, page number where
Sections B and E.1.). the document
begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-487 Filed 1-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P