Safety Zone; Lake Mead Intake Construction, Lake Mead, Boulder City, NV, 2579-2581 [2011-692]
Download as PDF
2579
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Because no general notice of proposed
rulemaking is required for this
amendment, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980 does not apply. See 5 U.S.C.
601(2).
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 4022
Employee benefit plans, Pension
insurance, Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
On or after
*
Before
3–1–11
3. In appendix C to part 4022, Rate Set
208, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
■
For plans with a valuation
date
On or after
*
Before
*
208
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–1112]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Lake Mead Intake
Construction, Lake Mead, Boulder City,
NV
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of Lake Mead in
support of the construction project for
Lake Mead’s Intake #3 during the first
6 months of 2011. Blasting will take
place at regular intervals at the location
and in the manner set forth herein. This
safety zone is necessary to ensure
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Jan 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
4.00
*
*
*
*
*
i3
*
n1
*
4.00
n2
*
7
8
n1
n2
*
Deferred annuities
(percent)
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
2.50
i1
i2
*
4.00
4.00
i3
*
unauthorized personnel and vessels
remain safe by keeping clear of the
hazardous area during blasting
operations. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port (COTP) or his designated
representative.
This rule is effective in the CFR
on January 14, 2011 through June 30,
2011. This rule is effective with actual
notice for purposes of enforcement from
January 1, 2011 until June 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
1112 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–1112 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail BM1 Shane Jackson,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
DATES:
Coast Guard
*
Appendix C to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for Private-Sector
Payments
3–1–11
[FR Doc. 2011–725 Filed 1–13–11; 8:45 am]
*
i2
*
4.00
*
2–1–11
Issued in Washington, DC, on this 10th day
of January 2011.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Deputy Director for Operations, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION:
i1
2.50
*
Rate set
*
Deferred annuities
(percent)
Immediate
annuity rate
(percent)
*
2–1–11
Appendix B to Part 4022—Lump Sum
Interest Rates for PBGC Payments
1. The authority citation for part 4022
continues to read as follows:
*
208
2. In appendix B to part 4022, Rate Set
208, as set forth below, is added to the
table.
■
PART 4022—BENEFITS PAYABLE IN
TERMINATED SINGLE-EMPLOYER
PLANS
■
For plans with a valuation
date
Rate set
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302, 1322, 1322b,
1341(c)(3)(D), and 1344.
In consideration of the foregoing, 29
CFR part 4022 is amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
4.00
*
7
8
Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard;
telephone 619–278–7267, e-mail
Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because such
publication would be impractical given
the timing of the construction.
Immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of commercial and
recreational vessels in the vicinity of
any blasting on the dates and times this
rule will be in effect.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
2580
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delay in the effective date will
be contrary to the public interest.
Immediate action is needed to ensure
public safety in the vicinity of blasting
activities.
Background and Purpose
Vegas Tunnel Construction will be
conducting intermittent blasting
operations for the placement of a water
intake pipe in Lake Mead during the
first 6 months of 2011. A safety zone is
necessary to ensure unauthorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by
keeping clear of the hazardous area
during blasting operations.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone from January 1, 2011
through June 30, 2011. The safety zone
will be enforced only during blasting
operations, which will occur weekly at
8 a.m. and 11 a.m., Mondays through
Thursdays, and 8 a.m. on Fridays.
Operations will be preceded by a local
Broadcast Notice to Mariners at least
one hour prior to the commencement of
each blast. In the event additional blasts
are required due to the needs of the
construction company, the public will
be notified as soon as practicable, but in
no event less than one hour prior to
blasting.
The limits of the safety zone will
include the navigable waters within a
1300 foot radius of construction vessels
during transit and while at the blast site
located at approximately 36°05′24″ N,
114°45′60″ W. This safety zone is
necessary to ensure unauthorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by
keeping clear of the hazardous area
during blasting activities. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) or his designated representative.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Jan 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size
and location of the safety zone. The
safety zone is a small zone in a wide
area of Lake Mead, and it will only be
enforced intermittently. Commercial
and recreational vessels will not be
allowed to transit through the safety
zone while blasting operations are being
conducted. However, these vessels will
be able to travel around the safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the vicinity of Lake Mead Intake #3
(approximately 36°05′24″ N, 114°45′60″
W) during blasting operations from
January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will be
enforced only when blasting work is
actively being conducted. Vessel traffic
can pass safely around the zone. Before
the effective period, the construction
company will issue a Broadcast Notice
to Mariners (BNM) at least one hour
prior to the beginning of blasting and
the enforcement of this zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 10 / Friday, January 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 Jan 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295; 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–387 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–387 Safety Zone; Lake Mead
Intake Construction; Lake Mead, Boulder
City, NV
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include the navigable waters
of Lake Mead within a 1300 foot radius
of the construction vessels working on
Lake Mead Intake #3, located at
approximately 36°05′24″ N, 114°45′60″
W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be in effect from January 1, 2011
through June 30, 2011. The safety zone
will only be enforced during blasting
operations. Blasting operations will
occur weekly at 8 a.m. and 11 a.m.,
Mondays through Thursdays, and at 8
a.m. on Fridays. The Coast Guard will
publish a Local Notice to Mariners
before the rule takes effect. The
construction crew will notify the public
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners at least
one hour prior to commencement of
each blasting operation. In the event
additional blasts are required due to the
needs of the construction company, the
public will be notified as soon as
practicable, but in no event less than
one hour prior to blasting. If blasting
concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the COTP will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners will be
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2581
issued to notify the public that
enforcement has ended.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means
Commissioned, Warrant, or Petty
Officers of the Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, or local, state, and federal
law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
COTP.
(2) Unauthorized personnel and
vessels, means any civilian boats,
fishermen, divers, and swimmers.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the COTP San Diego or his designated
representative.
(2) Unauthorized personnel and
vessels wishing to transit through the
safety zone may request authorization to
do so from the COTP San Diego or his
designated representative using VHF–
FM Channel 16, or telephone number
(619) 278–7033.
(3) Vessels involved in construction
operations are allowed within the
confines of the established safety zone.
(4) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard COTP or his designated
representative.
(5) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard or other official personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(6) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: December 29, 2010.
P.J. Hill,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2011–692 Filed 1–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0107; FRL–9253–3]
Action To Ensure Authority To Issue
Permits Under the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Program to
Sources of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions: Federal Implementation
Plan for Jefferson County, KY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is establishing a federal
implementation plan (FIP) to apply in
Jefferson County, Kentucky because the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2579-2581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-692]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-1112]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Lake Mead Intake Construction, Lake Mead, Boulder
City, NV
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the navigable
waters of Lake Mead in support of the construction project for Lake
Mead's Intake 3 during the first 6 months of 2011. Blasting
will take place at regular intervals at the location and in the manner
set forth herein. This safety zone is necessary to ensure unauthorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the hazardous
area during blasting operations. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or his
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR on January 14, 2011 through
June 30, 2011. This rule is effective with actual notice for purposes
of enforcement from January 1, 2011 until June 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-1112 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-1112 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail BM1 Shane Jackson, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone 619-278-7267,
e-mail Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because such publication would be impractical
given the timing of the construction. Immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of commercial and recreational vessels in the
vicinity of any blasting on the dates and times this rule will be in
effect.
[[Page 2580]]
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delay in the effective date will
be contrary to the public interest. Immediate action is needed to
ensure public safety in the vicinity of blasting activities.
Background and Purpose
Vegas Tunnel Construction will be conducting intermittent blasting
operations for the placement of a water intake pipe in Lake Mead during
the first 6 months of 2011. A safety zone is necessary to ensure
unauthorized personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the
hazardous area during blasting operations.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone from January 1, 2011
through June 30, 2011. The safety zone will be enforced only during
blasting operations, which will occur weekly at 8 a.m. and 11 a.m.,
Mondays through Thursdays, and 8 a.m. on Fridays. Operations will be
preceded by a local Broadcast Notice to Mariners at least one hour
prior to the commencement of each blast. In the event additional blasts
are required due to the needs of the construction company, the public
will be notified as soon as practicable, but in no event less than one
hour prior to blasting.
The limits of the safety zone will include the navigable waters
within a 1300 foot radius of construction vessels during transit and
while at the blast site located at approximately 36[deg]05'24'' N,
114[deg]45'60'' W. This safety zone is necessary to ensure unauthorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the hazardous
area during blasting activities. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or his
designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the size and location of the safety zone. The safety zone is a small
zone in a wide area of Lake Mead, and it will only be enforced
intermittently. Commercial and recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the safety zone while blasting operations are being
conducted. However, these vessels will be able to travel around the
safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the vicinity of Lake Mead Intake 3 (approximately
36[deg]05'24'' N, 114[deg]45'60'' W) during blasting operations from
January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be enforced only when blasting work is actively being
conducted. Vessel traffic can pass safely around the zone. Before the
effective period, the construction company will issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners (BNM) at least one hour prior to the beginning of
blasting and the enforcement of this zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to
[[Page 2581]]
health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295; 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-387 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-387 Safety Zone; Lake Mead Intake Construction; Lake
Mead, Boulder City, NV
(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will include the
navigable waters of Lake Mead within a 1300 foot radius of the
construction vessels working on Lake Mead Intake 3, located at
approximately 36[deg]05'24'' N, 114[deg]45'60'' W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be in effect from January
1, 2011 through June 30, 2011. The safety zone will only be enforced
during blasting operations. Blasting operations will occur weekly at 8
a.m. and 11 a.m., Mondays through Thursdays, and at 8 a.m. on Fridays.
The Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners before the rule
takes effect. The construction crew will notify the public via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners at least one hour prior to commencement of
each blasting operation. In the event additional blasts are required
due to the needs of the construction company, the public will be
notified as soon as practicable, but in no event less than one hour
prior to blasting. If blasting concludes prior to the scheduled
termination time, the COTP will cease enforcement of this safety zone
and a Broadcast Notice to Mariners will be issued to notify the public
that enforcement has ended.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative means Commissioned, Warrant, or Petty
Officers of the Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, or local, state,
and federal law enforcement vessels who have been authorized to act on
the behalf of the COTP.
(2) Unauthorized personnel and vessels, means any civilian boats,
fishermen, divers, and swimmers.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP San
Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Unauthorized personnel and vessels wishing to transit through
the safety zone may request authorization to do so from the COTP San
Diego or his designated representative using VHF-FM Channel 16, or
telephone number (619) 278-7033.
(3) Vessels involved in construction operations are allowed within
the confines of the established safety zone.
(4) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard COTP or his designated representative.
(5) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard or other official
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator
of a vessel shall proceed as directed.
(6) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: December 29, 2010.
P.J. Hill,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2011-692 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P