TRICARE; Coverage of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Sponsored Phase I Studies, 2253-2254 [2011-621]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
ASD(HD&ASA), guidance regarding this
part as it relates to National Guard
matters.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011–620 Filed 1–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DoD–2009–HA–0051]
RIN 0720–AB31
TRICARE; Coverage of National
Cancer Institute (NCI) Sponsored
Phase I Studies
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule adds coverage
of National Cancer Institute (NCI)
sponsored Phase I studies for certain
beneficiaries. The NCI sponsored
clinical treatment trials are conducted
in a series of steps called phases. Phase
I trials are the first studies conducted in
people. They evaluate how a new drug
should be given (by mouth, injected into
the blood, or injected into the muscle),
how often, and what dose is safe.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective February 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander James Ellzy, TRICARE
Management Activity, Office of the
Chief Medical Officer, telephone (703)
681–0064.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
A. Background
This final rule adds the coverage of a
subset of National Cancer Institute (NCI)
sponsored Phase I trials for certain
TRICARE patients. The NCI sponsored
clinical treatment trials are conducted
in a series of steps called phases. Phase
I trials are the first studies conducted in
people. They evaluate how a new drug
should be given (by mouth, injected into
the blood, or injected into the muscle),
how often, and what dose is safe. A
Phase I trial usually enrolls only a small
number of patients, sometimes as few as
a dozen. A Phase II trial continues to
test the safety of the drug, and begins to
evaluate how well the new drug works.
Phase II studies usually focus on a
particular type of cancer. A Phase III
trial tests a new drug, a new
combination of drugs, or a new surgical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
procedure in comparison to the current
standard. A participant will usually be
assigned to the standard group or the
new group at random. Phase III trials
often enroll large numbers of people and
may be conducted at many doctors’
offices, clinics, and cancer centers
nationwide.
This final rule adds coverage only of
NCI sponsored Phase I trials with
clinical or pre-clinical data providing a
reasonable expectation that the
treatment will be at least as effective as
the non-investigational alternative.
Additionally, only those TRICARE
patients for whom standard treatment
has been or would be ineffective, does
not exist, or there is no superior noninvestigational treatment alternative,
would be eligible for these additional
trials. TRICARE has covered NCI
sponsored Phase II and III trials since
1996. The NCI estimates that Phase I
trial participants represent about 3.4
percent of overall Phase II and III
participants combined. Based on the
history of Department of Defense
participation in these studies, it is
estimated that there would be a
maximum of 1,000 new patients
annually enrolling in Phase I trials. It is
estimated that the net cost to TRICARE
of adding Phase I treatment trials will
increase costs by 12.8 percent of the
total gross costs (approximately
$150,000 in FY09). Currently, ten States
mandate coverage of at least some Phase
I trials.
B. Public Comments
The DoD published a proposed rule
on June 22, 2009 (74 FR 29435–29436).
One set of comments was received on
the proposed rule. The sole commenter
strongly supported the proposed rule
and urged the DoD to make it final. We
agree with this recommendation and
have not made any modifications to the
proposed rule.
C. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
Section 801 of Title 5, United States
Code (U.S.C.), and Executive Order
(E.O.) 12866 requires certain regulatory
assessments and procedures for any
major rule or significant regulatory
action, defined as one that would result
in an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the national economy, or which
would have other substantial impacts. It
has been certified that this rule is not an
economically significant rule; however,
it is a regulatory action which has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget as required under the
provisions of E.O. 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2253
Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been certified that this rule does
not contain a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local
and Tribal governments, in aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires each Federal agency prepare,
and make available for public comment,
a regulatory flexibility analysis when
the agency issues a regulation which
would have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This final rule will not significantly
affect a substantial number of small
entities for purposes of the RFA.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule will not impose additional
information collection requirements on
the public under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3511).
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
This final rule has been examined for
its impact under E.O. 13132 and it does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications that would have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government; therefore,
consultation with State and local
officials is not required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental Health, Health Care,
Health Insurance, Individuals with
Disabilities, Military Personnel.
■ Accordingly, 32 CFR, Part 199 is
amended as follows:
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 199
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter
55.
2. Section 199.4 is amended by:
A. Redesignating paragraphs
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2), (3) and (4) as paragraphs
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(3), (4) and (5);
■ B. Adding a sentence to the
introductory text in paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B);
■ C. Revising paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(ii);
■ D. Revising paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(iv);
■
■
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2254
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
E. Adding paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(v); and
■ F. Adding a new paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 199.4
33 CFR Part 146
■
Coast Guard
Basic program benefits.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(26) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) * * * Additionally, Phase I
studies may be approved on a case by
case basis when the requirements below
are met.
(1) * * *
(ii) Such treatments are NCI
sponsored Phase I, Phase II or Phase III
protocols; and
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) The institutional and individual
providers are CHAMPUS authorized
providers; and,
(v) The requirements for Phase I
protocols in paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) of
this section are met:
(2) Requirements for Phase I protocols
are:
(i) Standard treatment has been or
would be ineffective, does not exist, or
there is no superior non-investigational
treatment alternative; and,
(ii) The available clinical or
preclinical data provide a reasonable
expectation that the treatment will be at
least as effective as the noninvestigational alternative; and,
(iii) The facility and personnel
providing the treatment are capable of
doing so by virtue of their experience,
training, and volume of patients treated
to maintain expertise; and,
(iv) The referring physician has
concluded that the enrollee’s
participation in such a trial would be
appropriate based upon the satisfaction
of paragraphs (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2)(i) through
(iii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 4, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2011–621 Filed 1–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
[Docket No. USCG–2008–1088]
RIN 1625–AB28
Notice of Arrival on the Outer
Continental Shelf
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard revises its
regulations on Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) Activities to enhance maritime
domain safety and security awareness
on the OCS by issuing regulations
which will require notice of arrival for
floating facilities, mobile offshore
drilling units (MODUs), and vessels
planning to engage in OCS activities.
This final rule implements provisions of
the Security and Accountability for
Every Port Act of 2006 and increases
overall maritime domain awareness by
requiring owners or operators of United
States and foreign flag floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels to submit notice of
arrival information to the National
Vessel Movement Center prior to
engaging in OCS activities.
DATES: This final rule is effective
February 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2008–1088 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2008–1088 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Kevin Pekarek, Vessel and
Facility Operating Standards Division
(CG–5222), Coast Guard; telephone 202–
372–1386, e-mail
Kevin.Y.Pekarek2@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Regulatory History
III. Basis and Purpose
IV. Background
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
BOEMRE Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations.
DHS Department of Homeland
Security.
FR FEDERAL REGISTER.
ISM International Safety Management.
ISSC International Ship Security
Certificate.
MMS Minerals Management Service.
MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit.
NAICS North American Industry
Classification System.
NOA Notice of Arrival.
NOA OCS Notice of Arrival on the
Outer Continental Shelf.
NPRM Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking.
NTTAA National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act, 15 U.S.C. 272
note.
NVMC National Vessel Movement
Center.
OCS Outer Continental Shelf.
OCSLA Outer Continental Shelf Lands
Act.
OIRA Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
OMB Office of Management and
Budget.
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601–612.
SAFE Port Act Security and
Accountability for Every Port Act of
2006, Pub. L. 109–347, 120 Stat. 1884
(2006).
U.S.C. United States Code.
U.S.C.A. United States Code
Annotated.
II. Regulatory History
On June 22, 2009, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Notice of Arrival (NOA) on the
Outer Continental Shelf in the Federal
Register (74 FR 29439). We received two
sets of comments on the proposed rule
prior to the close of the comment
period. One additional set of comments
was received after the close of the
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2253-2254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-621]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DoD-2009-HA-0051]
RIN 0720-AB31
TRICARE; Coverage of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Sponsored
Phase I Studies
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule adds coverage of National Cancer Institute
(NCI) sponsored Phase I studies for certain beneficiaries. The NCI
sponsored clinical treatment trials are conducted in a series of steps
called phases. Phase I trials are the first studies conducted in
people. They evaluate how a new drug should be given (by mouth,
injected into the blood, or injected into the muscle), how often, and
what dose is safe.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective February 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander James Ellzy, TRICARE
Management Activity, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, telephone
(703) 681-0064.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This final rule adds the coverage of a subset of National Cancer
Institute (NCI) sponsored Phase I trials for certain TRICARE patients.
The NCI sponsored clinical treatment trials are conducted in a series
of steps called phases. Phase I trials are the first studies conducted
in people. They evaluate how a new drug should be given (by mouth,
injected into the blood, or injected into the muscle), how often, and
what dose is safe. A Phase I trial usually enrolls only a small number
of patients, sometimes as few as a dozen. A Phase II trial continues to
test the safety of the drug, and begins to evaluate how well the new
drug works. Phase II studies usually focus on a particular type of
cancer. A Phase III trial tests a new drug, a new combination of drugs,
or a new surgical procedure in comparison to the current standard. A
participant will usually be assigned to the standard group or the new
group at random. Phase III trials often enroll large numbers of people
and may be conducted at many doctors' offices, clinics, and cancer
centers nationwide.
This final rule adds coverage only of NCI sponsored Phase I trials
with clinical or pre-clinical data providing a reasonable expectation
that the treatment will be at least as effective as the non-
investigational alternative. Additionally, only those TRICARE patients
for whom standard treatment has been or would be ineffective, does not
exist, or there is no superior non-investigational treatment
alternative, would be eligible for these additional trials. TRICARE has
covered NCI sponsored Phase II and III trials since 1996. The NCI
estimates that Phase I trial participants represent about 3.4 percent
of overall Phase II and III participants combined. Based on the history
of Department of Defense participation in these studies, it is
estimated that there would be a maximum of 1,000 new patients annually
enrolling in Phase I trials. It is estimated that the net cost to
TRICARE of adding Phase I treatment trials will increase costs by 12.8
percent of the total gross costs (approximately $150,000 in FY09).
Currently, ten States mandate coverage of at least some Phase I trials.
B. Public Comments
The DoD published a proposed rule on June 22, 2009 (74 FR 29435-
29436). One set of comments was received on the proposed rule. The sole
commenter strongly supported the proposed rule and urged the DoD to
make it final. We agree with this recommendation and have not made any
modifications to the proposed rule.
C. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
Section 801 of Title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.), and Executive
Order (E.O.) 12866 requires certain regulatory assessments and
procedures for any major rule or significant regulatory action, defined
as one that would result in an annual effect of $100 million or more on
the national economy, or which would have other substantial impacts. It
has been certified that this rule is not an economically significant
rule; however, it is a regulatory action which has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget as required under the provisions of
E.O. 12866.
Sec. 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been certified that this rule does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and Tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires each Federal agency
prepare, and make available for public comment, a regulatory
flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation which would
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule will not significantly affect a substantial number of
small entities for purposes of the RFA.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule will not impose additional information collection
requirements on the public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3511).
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
This final rule has been examined for its impact under E.O. 13132
and it does not contain policies that have federalism implications that
would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government; therefore, consultation with State and local officials is
not required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental Health, Health Care, Health Insurance, Individuals
with Disabilities, Military Personnel.
0
Accordingly, 32 CFR, Part 199 is amended as follows:
PART 199--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 199 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. Chapter 55.
0
2. Section 199.4 is amended by:
0
A. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2), (3) and (4) as
paragraphs (e)(26)(ii)(B)(3), (4) and (5);
0
B. Adding a sentence to the introductory text in paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B);
0
C. Revising paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(ii);
0
D. Revising paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(iv);
[[Page 2254]]
0
E. Adding paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(v); and
0
F. Adding a new paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 199.4 Basic program benefits.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(26) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) * * * Additionally, Phase I studies may be approved on a case
by case basis when the requirements below are met.
(1) * * *
(ii) Such treatments are NCI sponsored Phase I, Phase II or Phase
III protocols; and
* * * * *
(iv) The institutional and individual providers are CHAMPUS
authorized providers; and,
(v) The requirements for Phase I protocols in paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) of this section are met:
(2) Requirements for Phase I protocols are:
(i) Standard treatment has been or would be ineffective, does not
exist, or there is no superior non-investigational treatment
alternative; and,
(ii) The available clinical or preclinical data provide a
reasonable expectation that the treatment will be at least as effective
as the non-investigational alternative; and,
(iii) The facility and personnel providing the treatment are
capable of doing so by virtue of their experience, training, and volume
of patients treated to maintain expertise; and,
(iv) The referring physician has concluded that the enrollee's
participation in such a trial would be appropriate based upon the
satisfaction of paragraphs (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
* * * * *
Dated: January 4, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-621 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P