Notice of Arrival on the Outer Continental Shelf, 2254-2263 [2011-569]
Download as PDF
2254
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
E. Adding paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(v); and
■ F. Adding a new paragraph
(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 199.4
33 CFR Part 146
■
Coast Guard
Basic program benefits.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(26) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) * * * Additionally, Phase I
studies may be approved on a case by
case basis when the requirements below
are met.
(1) * * *
(ii) Such treatments are NCI
sponsored Phase I, Phase II or Phase III
protocols; and
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) The institutional and individual
providers are CHAMPUS authorized
providers; and,
(v) The requirements for Phase I
protocols in paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) of
this section are met:
(2) Requirements for Phase I protocols
are:
(i) Standard treatment has been or
would be ineffective, does not exist, or
there is no superior non-investigational
treatment alternative; and,
(ii) The available clinical or
preclinical data provide a reasonable
expectation that the treatment will be at
least as effective as the noninvestigational alternative; and,
(iii) The facility and personnel
providing the treatment are capable of
doing so by virtue of their experience,
training, and volume of patients treated
to maintain expertise; and,
(iv) The referring physician has
concluded that the enrollee’s
participation in such a trial would be
appropriate based upon the satisfaction
of paragraphs (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2)(i) through
(iii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 4, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2011–621 Filed 1–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
[Docket No. USCG–2008–1088]
RIN 1625–AB28
Notice of Arrival on the Outer
Continental Shelf
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard revises its
regulations on Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) Activities to enhance maritime
domain safety and security awareness
on the OCS by issuing regulations
which will require notice of arrival for
floating facilities, mobile offshore
drilling units (MODUs), and vessels
planning to engage in OCS activities.
This final rule implements provisions of
the Security and Accountability for
Every Port Act of 2006 and increases
overall maritime domain awareness by
requiring owners or operators of United
States and foreign flag floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels to submit notice of
arrival information to the National
Vessel Movement Center prior to
engaging in OCS activities.
DATES: This final rule is effective
February 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2008–1088 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2008–1088 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Kevin Pekarek, Vessel and
Facility Operating Standards Division
(CG–5222), Coast Guard; telephone 202–
372–1386, e-mail
Kevin.Y.Pekarek2@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Regulatory History
III. Basis and Purpose
IV. Background
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
BOEMRE Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations.
DHS Department of Homeland
Security.
FR FEDERAL REGISTER.
ISM International Safety Management.
ISSC International Ship Security
Certificate.
MMS Minerals Management Service.
MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit.
NAICS North American Industry
Classification System.
NOA Notice of Arrival.
NOA OCS Notice of Arrival on the
Outer Continental Shelf.
NPRM Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking.
NTTAA National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act, 15 U.S.C. 272
note.
NVMC National Vessel Movement
Center.
OCS Outer Continental Shelf.
OCSLA Outer Continental Shelf Lands
Act.
OIRA Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
OMB Office of Management and
Budget.
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601–612.
SAFE Port Act Security and
Accountability for Every Port Act of
2006, Pub. L. 109–347, 120 Stat. 1884
(2006).
U.S.C. United States Code.
U.S.C.A. United States Code
Annotated.
II. Regulatory History
On June 22, 2009, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Notice of Arrival (NOA) on the
Outer Continental Shelf in the Federal
Register (74 FR 29439). We received two
sets of comments on the proposed rule
prior to the close of the comment
period. One additional set of comments
was received after the close of the
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
comment period, responding to
comments submitted earlier. No public
meeting was requested and none was
held.
III. Basis and Purpose
Congress and the President enacted
the Security and Accountability for
Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act),
Public Law 109–347, 120 Stat. 1884, on
October 13, 2006. This rule is in
response to Section 109 of the SAFE
Port Act,1 which requires publication,
within 180 days of enactment, of
regulations that ‘‘update and finalize’’
NOA procedures for foreign vessels 2 on
the OCS. As required by the SAFE Port
Act, this final rule makes our
regulations ‘‘consistent with information
required under the Notice of Arrival
§ 160.206 of title 33, Code of Federal
Regulations as in effect on the date of
enactment of the Act.’’ It adds NOA
requirements for foreign vessels on the
OCS. It also extends those requirements
to U.S. floating facilities, MODUs, and
vessels arriving on, and engaging in,
OCS activities from foreign ports or
places, and moving from one OCS block
area to another. In addition to
implementing the SAFE Port Act and
expanding NOA requirements, this rule
enhances security by requiring U.S. and
foreign vessels, floating facilities, and
MODUs arriving on and engaging in
OCS activities to report their arrival
times and locations and information
regarding the vessels, voyage, cargo, and
crew. Such information is critical to
maritime domain safety and security
awareness and will enable the Coast
Guard to more effectively prevent or
respond to a safety or security concern
on the OCS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
IV. Background
The legislative history for the SAFE
Port Act relating to the ‘‘update and
finalize’’ language found in section 109
provides no specific direction for
implementing that section. The Senate
version of the bill contains the section
109 provisions, and the House of
Representatives bill does not. The
Congressional record does not otherwise
elucidate the requirement. The House of
Representatives Conference Report
reveals only that both houses of
Congress adopted section 109 without
additional discussion.3
1 33
U.S.C. 1223 note (West 2009).
defined in 1 U.S.C. 3 (and reiterated in part
140 of this subchapter) a vessel is ‘‘every
description of watercraft or other artificial
contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a
means of transportation on water.’’ This definition
includes those units we propose to regulate with
this rulemaking (i.e., floating facilities, MODUs, and
vessels engaging in OCS activities).
3 H.R. 4954, 152nd Cong. (2006).
2 As
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
Other Coast Guard NOA OCS
Regulations, 33 CFR 146.202
The Coast Guard does, however, have
existing OCS NOA regulations, which
cover only MODUs. These were
established on March 4, 1982, as part of
a final rule entitled, Outer Continental
Shelf Activities (47 FR 9366). The Outer
Continental Shelf Activities rule was in
response to enactment of the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act
Amendments of 1978 and impacted
requirements for design, equipment,
operations, manning, inspections, and
investigations for facilities, vessels, and
other units (domestic and foreign)
engaged in OCS activities.
However, the rule also had provisions
specifically regarding MODUs. Those
provisions ensured that foreign MODUs
operating on the OCS meet the manning
and safety standards comparable to
those met by U.S. MODUs. A provision
of that rule, 33 CFR 146.202, specifically
addresses NOA and relocation of any
MODU on the OCS. That section
provides that an owner of any MODU
engaged in OCS activities must, 14 days
before arrival of the MODU on the OCS
or as soon thereafter as practicable,
notify the District Commander for the
area in which the MODU will operate
of: (1) The MODU’s name, nationality,
and designation assigned for
identification under 30 CFR 250.37; (2)
the location and year that the MODU
was built; (3) the name and address of
the owner, and the owner’s local
representative, if any; (4) classification
or inspection certificates currently held
by the MODU; (5) the location and date
that operations are expected to
commence, and their anticipated
duration; and (6) the location and date
that the MODU will be available and
ready for inspection by the Coast Guard.
In addition, once a MODU is located on
the OCS, the owner must notify the
District Commander before relocating
the MODU. The purpose of 33 CFR
146.202 is to assist District Commanders
in gathering information on MODUs
prior to inspection of those units.
Consistency With 33 CFR 160.206
The Coast Guard also has recently
updated NOA rules. In response to the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
the Coast Guard published, on February
28, 2003, the final rule entitled
Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports (68
FR 9537). The rule enhanced
notification of arrival and departure
requirements for U.S. and foreign
vessels bound for, or departing from,
ports or places in the United States. The
rule also increased, from 24 hours to 96
hours, the advance notice a vessel must
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2255
submit to the National Vessel Movement
Center (NVMC); described the
timeframes for updating an NOA; and
added more information to the list of
items that must be submitted, as part of
the NOA, to the NVMC. Pursuant to that
rule, specifically 33 CFR 160.206, the
information items submitted to the
NVMC include: Vessel information;
voyage information; cargo information;
information for each crewmember
onboard; information for each person
onboard in addition to the crew;
operational condition of equipment;
International Safety Management (ISM)
code notice; Cargo Declaration; and
International Ship and Port Facility
code (ISPS) notice. The Coast Guard
collects this information to ensure, to
the extent practicable, public safety,
security, and the uninterrupted flow of
commerce.
Coast Guard Action
After considering section 109 of the
SAFE Port Act and current NOA rules,
the Coast Guard has determined that
section 109 of the SAFE Port Act
requires finalizing NOA OCS rules by
adding to those requirements found at
§ 146.202 for MODUs. This new final
rule is designed to be consistent with
the NOA requirements of § 160.206 for
vessels bound for, or departing from,
ports, or places in the United States.
This rulemaking is intended to
comply with the section 109 mandate. It
also extends those NOA OCS
requirements to U.S floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels (arriving on, and
engaging in, OCS activities from foreign
ports or places) under the authority of
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act,
43 U.S.C. 1356 (2007), and the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act, 33 U.S.C. 1226
(2007). Extending the NOA OCS
requirements is essential for overall
maritime domain safety and security
awareness. Moreover, obtaining
knowledge of all individuals, floating
facilities, MODUs, and vessels engaging
in OCS activities will better equip the
Coast Guard to prevent and respond to
a safety or security incident on the OCS.
If the Coast Guard receives specific
threat information for an area, the
knowledge obtained from these
requirements will enable it to know who
is in the area, what they are doing, and
how to contact them. In addition, if a
floating facility, MODU, or vessel has an
incident, the Coast Guard will be able to
use this knowledge to better assess the
potential impacts of the event, respond
to it, and seek additional assistance in
that or a nearby area when needed.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2256
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
V. Discussion of Comments and
Changes
The Coast Guard received two sets of
comments from trade associations in
response to the NPRM. The Coast Guard
considered all comments filed. Below,
we discuss in detail the public
comments addressing issues raised in
the NPRM and our responses to those
comments.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
1. Definition of ‘‘OCS Activity’’ and the
Energy Policy Act
Two separate commenters suggested
that the definition of ‘‘OCS activity,’’ as
used in the rule, be revised in light of
amendments to the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), particularly
those amendments created by Section
388 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
Coast Guard Response. The definition
of ‘‘OCS activity’’ is found in the
regulations at 33 CFR 140.10. Section
140.10 defines ‘‘OCS activity’’ as ‘‘any
offshore activity associated with
exploration for, or development or
production of, the minerals of the Outer
Continental Shelf.’’ 33 CFR 140.10. This
rulemaking was intended to implement
the SAFE Port Act and not the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, which permits
leases, easements, or rights-of-way on
the OCS for activities not otherwise
authorized under other laws, including:
(1) Exploration, development,
production, or storage of oil or natural
gas except in areas prohibited by a
moratorium; (2) transportation of oil or
natural gas, excluding shipping
activities; (3) production, transportation,
or transmission of energy from sources
other than oil or gas; and (3) use of
facilities for activities authorized under
the Act. Energy Policy Act of 2005
section 388, Public Law 109–58, 119
Stat. 744. Because the goal of this rule
was directed by the SAFE Port Act and
was not to alter the definition of ‘‘OCS
activity,’’ as established in Title 33 of
the CFR, doing so would be beyond the
scope of this rule.
2. NOAs for Moves Between OCS
Locations
One commenter asks that we either
modify the rule to eliminate the need for
NOAs for units moving between
locations on the OCS or coordinate the
processing of the NOA requirements
with those regarding navigation safety
(33 CFR 143.15) to reduce reporting
burdens. A separate commenter asserts
the opposite, stating that vessels must
report their movements between OCS
locations and ports and that this
requirement should also include vessels
that do not moor offshore.
Coast Guard Response. Current
regulations state that the owner must
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
notify the District Commander when a
unit is relocated. The goal of the SAFE
Port Act is to improve maritime and
cargo security through enhanced layered
defenses. Requiring revised NOAs each
time there is a change in position
furthers that goal. However, the Coast
Guard believes it would be sufficient for
an NOA to be required only when
MODUs, floating facilities, and vessels
arrive from a foreign port or place, or
move a few miles from one OCS block
area to another. OCS block areas are
used by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOE)—formerly the
Minerals Management Service—to
facilitate management and leasing on
the OCS. They vary in size depending
on the OCS blocks the block areas
contain. The OCSLA permits a
maximum size for an OCS block of
5,760 acres (9 square miles).
For example, a MODU, floating
facility, or vessel moving within the
Green Canyon block area would not
have to submit a revised NOA; but if
moving from Green Canyon to the
Walker Ridge block area, a revised NOA
would be required. Therefore,
§§ 146.103(a), 146.104(a), 146.215(a),
and 146.405(a)(1) have been revised to
reflect this change. Definitions for
‘‘arrives on the OCS’’ and ‘‘OCS block
areas’’ have been added as new
§§ 146.102, 146.200, and 146.402.
For the alternative suggestion of
coordinating processing of the NOA
requirements with those regarding
navigation safety, this is not possible
because the reports are for different
functions and are sent to different
offices. Coast Guard navigation safety
requirements used for lights and
warning devices to prevent collisions at
sea are sent to the office of the District
Commander. NOA requirements for
maritime security are submitted to the
National Vessel Movement Center office
(NVMC).
3. Authorities
One commenter questions the use of
the Ports and Waterways Safety Act as
an authority for this rule. That
commenter notes that at the time the
Coast Guard proposed the existing NOA
rules in 33 CFR 160.206, this same
commenter questioned the applicability
of those rules to OCS facilities as a ‘‘port
or place in the United States.’’ The
commenter argues that our response to
that comment indicates that we do not
interpret OCS locations to be a ‘‘port or
place in the United States’’ for purposes
of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act.
As such, the commenter says 33 U.S.C.
1223 and 1226 should not be listed as
authorities. If they are included, they
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ask the Coast Guard to clarify its
understanding of OCS facilities under
the Act.
Coast Guard Response. 33 U.S.C. 1223
refers to ‘‘a port or place subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States’’ (rather
than a ‘‘port or place in the United
States’’). Also, 33 U.S.C. 1226 provides
authority to take actions to prevent or
respond to acts of terrorism against
individuals, vessels, or structures
‘‘subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States.’’ 33 CFR 101.105 defines ‘‘waters
subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.’’ as
including the following: ‘‘in respect to
facilities located on the Outer
Continental Shelf of the U.S., the waters
superjacent thereto.’’ These provisions
underscore the authority of the Ports
and Waterways Safety Act in driving
this rule, which establishes regulations
requiring notice of arrival for United
States and foreign flag floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels prior to engaging
in OCS activities.
4. Use of Information Reported
One commenter states that the
information the Coast Guard requests
with this rule, particularly in
§ 146.103(a)(6)(v), which requires
reporting positions or duties for
individuals on board floating facilities,
will be used for other purposes, such as
enforcement of cabotage (coastal trade
and/or navigation) or OCS employment
restrictions. This commenter requests
that we remove this requirement.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard disagrees that this information is
being requested for cabotage, OCS
employment restrictions, or other nonNOA purposes. The information is being
requested for security purposes and
reflects existing NOA requirements in
33 CFR 160.206, as required by the
SAFE Port Act. As noted, maintaining
situational awareness is the foundation
of a comprehensive security regime.
This information will enable the Coast
Guard to respond to emerging threats on
the OCS through such mechanisms as
critical notices to operators in the area
that may be threatened. It will also
improve maritime safety by enabling the
Coast Guard to better protect mariners
operating on the OCS.
5. Estimated Costs
One commenter states that costs
should be modified to eliminate the
need for vessels moving between OCS
locations to comply with NOA
requirements.
Coast Guard Response. As indicated
above, we have clarified the need for
NOAs when moving between OCS
locations. Vessels moving between OCS
block areas will still need to comply
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
with the NOA requirements. However,
vessels moving from one location to
another within the same OCS block area
do not have to submit NOAs.
6. Information Collection
One commenter suggests that the
Coast Guard eliminate the need to report
certain information regarding persons
onboard the arriving vessels.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard disagrees with this
recommendation. We request this
information to comply with the SAFE
Port Act (Table 160.206 item (4)(v)).
7. Coordinating With Other
Rulemakings
One commenter states that the
rulemakings on OCS Notice of Arrival
and the current development of notice
of arrival and departure requirements
should be coordinated.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees and we have worked to
ensure uniformity between this and
other relevant rulemakings.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
8. Making NOA Information Accessible
One commenter states that some of
the information reported under the
NOA, though not information relating to
crew personnel, should be publicly
accessible and made available in realtime. In addition, the commenter states
that all information submitted under
this regulation should be accessible to
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
and other Federal agencies.
Coast Guard Response. General
information about a vessel’s arrival or
departure is normally made available by
port authorities. Local harbor masters
have access to this data and are good
sources of information. In addition,
such information is available to the
public through such sources as https://
www.vesseltracker.com. More detailed
information in an NOA will be released
in accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The Coast
Guard already routinely shares this
information with other Federal, State,
and local agencies and coordinates with
CBP.
9. Section 146.103—Vessels Under Tow
One commenter believes any vessels,
facilities, or MODUs under tow should
provide separate NOAs from the towing
vessel or offer an option for the ‘‘lead’’
towing vessel to submit a single NOA
for the combined ‘‘tow.’’
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees that the ‘‘lead’’ towing
vessel could submit a single NOA for
the entire ‘‘tow.’’ It is the responsibility
of the owner or operator of the unit
being towed to designate which towing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
vessel, if there is more than one, is the
‘‘lead’’ towing vessel and is responsible
for submitting the overall NOA. Section
146.103(f) has been revised to clarify
that the ‘‘lead’’ towing vessel is
responsible for submitting the overall
NOA. Sections 146.104(f), 146.215(f),
and 146.405(f) have also been revised to
reflect this change.
10. Section 146.103—Reference to ‘‘Flag
Administration’’
One commenter recommends that the
Coast Guard remove § 146.103(a)(7) and
(a)(8), which reference ‘‘flag
administration’’ because that section is
specific to U.S. floating facilities.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees with this comment.
Therefore, § 146.103(a)(7) and (a)(8)
have been removed.
11. Section 146.103—Change in Delay
for Updated NOA
One commenter suggests the change
in arrival time not requiring an updated
NOA in this section be changed from 6
hours to 24 hours (§ 146.103(c)(1)). This
commenter believes that there is no
substantive difference in the risk posed
by a delay of 24 hours versus a delay of
6 hours, given the remote locations and
minimal direct threat.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard disagrees because the SAFE Port
Act requires us to issue regulations
consistent with the existing NOA
regulations found in Title 33 of the CFR.
Existing regulations in 33 CFR
160.208(b)(1) require vessels to submit
revised NOAs if changes in arrival or
departure times are more than 6 hours.
12. Section 146.103(c)(2)
One commenter finds the wording in
§ 146.103(c)(2) confusing since the
location of the floating facility would be
known at the time the report is made.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees and has revised
§ 146.103(c)(2) to read: ‘‘Changes in the
location, latitude and longitude, of the
floating facility from the location at the
time the NOA was reported; or’’. The
Coast Guard also made similar changes
in § 146.104(c)(2), § 146.215(c)(2), and
§ 146.405(c)(2).
13. Section 146.103(d)(1)
One commenter finds that
§ 146.103(d)(1) and (d)(2) provides an
exception to the 96-hour reporting
requirement created in § 146.103(a) and
that paragraph (d)(1) is redundant with
paragraph (a).
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees that paragraph (d)(1) is
redundant, but it provides additional
clarity by repeating this requirement
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2257
and then breaking out the differing
requirements when the voyage is more
than 96 hours, as opposed to when the
voyage is less than 96 hours.
14. Section 146.103(f)—Towing of a
Facility/Vessel
One commenter states that
§ 146.103(f) should be removed because
it implies that the towing of a facility or
vessel to an OCS location is an ‘‘OCS
activity’’ as defined in 33 CFR 140.10.
The same commenter asks that as an
alternative to removing paragraph (f),
we address the possibility that multiple
towing vessels may be involved in the
tow of a single facility/vessel and
discuss how NOA requirements would
be met for a facility/vessel arriving on
the OCS via a heavy lift transport.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard does not believe that paragraph
(f) should be removed. In 33 CFR
140.10, ‘‘OCS activity’’ is defined as ‘‘any
offshore activity associated with
exploration for, or development or
production of, the minerals of the Outer
Continental Shelf.’’ This is a broad
definition that encompasses a towing
vessel on the OCS towing a facility/
vessel on the OCS. The Coast Guard has
exempted vessels, floating facilities, and
MODUs that are merely transiting across
the OCS and not engaging in OCS
activities.
However, as noted above, the Coast
Guard agrees it is possible to have
multiple towing vessels involved in the
tow of a single facility/vessel. We
believe it is the responsibility of the
owner or operator of the unit being
towed to designate which towing vessel
will be the lead towing vessel, if there
is more than one, and therefore
responsible for submitting the overall
NOA.
15. Section 146.103(g)—‘‘Superjacent’’
vs. ‘‘Superadjacent’’
One commenter recommends that the
word ‘‘superjacent’’ be changed to
‘‘superadjacent’’ in § 146.103(g) for
consistency within Title 33 and points
to the definition of ‘‘waters subject to the
jurisdiction of the U.S.’’ at 33 CFR
101.105.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard disagrees that ‘‘superjacent’’
should be changed to ‘‘superadjacent.’’
Title 33 of the U.S. Code uses
‘‘superjacent’’ and not ‘‘superadjacent.’’
We are using the word ‘‘superjacent’’ in
order to be consistent with its use in
both Title 33 and 33 CFR 101.105.
16. Section 146.215(a)(3)—Reporting the
IMO Number
One commenter states that the Coast
Guard should also require MODUs to
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2258
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
17. Section 146.215—Reporting
‘‘Position or Duties’’
One commenter states that the
requirement for the description of
‘‘position or duties’’ of personnel on a
facility or vessel (as required in
§ 146.215(a)(6)(v)) is irrelevant because
the job descriptions of industrial
personnel would be difficult for the
Coast Guard to interpret.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard does not agree because the SAFE
Port Act requires us to issue regulations
consistent with the existing NOA
regulations found in Title 33 of the CFR.
Existing regulations in 33 CFR Subpart
C Table 160.206 item (4)(v) require
descriptions of positions or duties to be
provided as part of an NOA.
18. Section 146.215—MODU NOA
One commenter states that MODUs
should not be required to submit
anything other than a simple notice of
arrival because they do not present the
risk of being weaponized or of
smuggling merchandise or individuals
into the United States.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard does not agree. We believe that
MODUs arriving on the OCS from
abroad present the same security risk as
OCS facilities and vessels.
19. Section 146.405—Interpreting
‘‘Arrives on the OCS’’
One commenter states that the phrase
‘‘arrives on the OCS’’ could be
interpreted in more than one way and
that the interpretation affects how the
rule is applied.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard partially agrees that the phrase
could be interpreted in more than one
way. We have added § 146.102 to define
‘‘arrives on the OCS’’ to offer clarity to
the issue. New §§ 146.200 and 146.402
have also been added to similarly clarify
the use of the phrase in these subparts.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
20. Section 146.405(b)(1)—Exceptions to
NOA Information
One commenter states that in
§ 146.405(b)(1), it was unclear why only
item (2)(iii) of Table 160.206 was
exempted and not items (2)(iv) through
(2)(vi).
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees that items (2)(iv) through
(2)(vi) should also be exempted and has
revised § 146.405(b)(1) accordingly. The
information in items (2)(iv) through
(2)(vi) is not applicable and is not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Order. It requires an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order.
Public comments on the NPRM are
summarized in Part V of this
publication. We received no public
comments that would alter our
assessment of the impacts discussed in
the NPRM. We have adopted the
assessment in the NPRM as final. See
the ‘‘Regulatory Analyses’’ section of the
NPRM for more details. A summary of
the assessment follows.
This rulemaking requires certain U.S.
and foreign owners or operators of
floating facilities, MODUs, and vessels
to submit NOA information to the
NVMC prior to engaging in OCS
activities.
Based on industry information from
the National Offshore Advisory
Committee (NOSAC), we estimate that
there are 7 to 12 arrivals on the OCS
each month for a total of 84 to 144
annual arrivals on the OCS each year.
We also estimate that approximately 95
percent of the floating facilities, vessels,
and MODUs operating on the OCS
affected under this rulemaking would be
foreign flag.
The additional costs of this
rulemaking to industry are the proposed
NOA reporting requirements. We
estimate that one NOA requires 30
minutes to complete plus a transmittal
fee of $2 per submission.4 Similar to
other NOA reporting analyses, we use
an average loaded wage rate of
approximately $31 per hour to estimate
the labor costs for NOA reporting
activities.
Based on the arrival data and the
reporting time and cost information, we
estimate the annual cost of this
rulemaking to industry to be $1,470 to
$2,520 (non-discounted). We estimate
the present value 10-year cost of this
rulemaking to industry to be $10,300 to
$17,700 at a 7 percent discount rate
(rounded).
We expect the primary benefit of this
rulemaking would be enhanced
situational awareness of activities on the
OCS. This enhanced situational
awareness would assist the Coast Guard
in evaluating potential safety and
security risks associated with these
activities and assist the Coast Guard in
managing resources used to regulate
these activities and respond to incidents
on the OCS.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review. The Office of Management and
Budget has reviewed it under that
4 Sources: (1) Collection of Information, OMB
Control Number 1625–0100, ‘‘Advance Notice of
Arrival and Electronic Transmission of Vessel
Transit Data’’; and (2) Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, ‘‘Vessel Requirements for Notices of
Arrival and Departure, and Automatic Identification
System’’ [USCG–2005–21869].
required for MODUs and floating
facilities and will not be required for
vessels.
report the IMO number in addition to
the facility’s name.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees and has modified
§ 146.215(a)(3) as requested.
21. Section 146.405(b)(1)—Cargo
Declaration
One commenter asserts that it is
inappropriate to require a cargo
declaration for NOAs as stated in
§ 146.405 since most vessels subject to
this subpart would not require customs
clearance. A separate commenter states
the opposite, insisting that a cargo
declaration form should be necessary
whenever a foreign vessel transports
cargo to and from a port and an OCS
location.
Coast Guard Response. In those
instances where foreign flag vessels are
transporting cargo to and from a U.S.
port and a mineral extraction facility
pursuant to OCSLA, the owners/
operators of those vessels are, in fact,
required to submit cargo declaration
forms pursuant to CBP regulations on
vessel entry (as established under 19
U.S.C. 1434) and clearance (as
established under 46 U.S.C. 60105).
However, the Coast Guard agrees that it
would be inappropriate for those vessels
not otherwise required to submit a cargo
declaration form to have to submit one
for NOA purposes. Accordingly, we
have revised § 146.405 to exempt item
(8) from the information required in
Table 160.206 for all vessels except
those foreign flag vessels subject to the
CBP regulations noted above.
22. Section 146.103
One commenter notes the language in
new § 146.103 (a)(2): ‘‘The area
designation and block number or lease
number, assigned under 30 CFR 250.154
for identification, where the floating
facility plans to perform OCS activities.’’
The commenter points out that facilities
are not sentient and, therefore, cannot
plan activities on the OCS.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast
Guard agrees and has made the
necessary changes in the regulatory text
to clarify (in sections 146.103, 146.104
and 146.405).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have
considered whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
In the NPRM, we certified under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that the proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We received no public
comments that would alter our
certification in the NPRM. We have
found no additional data or information
that would change our findings in the
NPRM. We have adopted the
certification in the NPRM for this final
rule. See the ‘‘Small Entity’’ section of
the NPRM for additional details.
We expect the rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
entities since the costs of this
rulemaking are small and the cost
burden per NOA submission is only
about $18.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please consult Mr. Kevin
Pekarek, Vessel and Facility Operating
Standards Division (CG–5222);
telephone 202–372–1386. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). It would require a revision to an
existing collection. The following is a
summary of the burden associated with
the revision.
As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c),
‘‘collection of information’’ comprises
reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring,
posting, labeling, and other similar
actions. The title and description of the
information collection, a description of
those who must collect the information,
and an estimate of the total annual
burden follow. The estimate covers the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing sources of data,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection.
This rule amends the collection of
information requirements for owners
and operators. The rule requires
modifying the burden in the previously
approved collection under OMB Control
Number 1625–0100.
Title: Advance Notice of Vessel
Arrival.
OMB Control Number: 1625–0100.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: The rule requires owners
and operators of vessels, MODUs, and
floating facilities to submit an advance
notice of arrival electronically to the
NVMC. This requires a change in the
previously approved OMB Collection
1625–0100 because it expands the NOA
requirement to include vessels, MODUs,
and floating facilities engaging in OCS
activities.
This rule will not change the
information collected in OMB
Collection 1625–0100. This rule will
expand the number of respondents to
include owners and operators of vessels,
MODUs, and floating facilities that
engage in OCS activities.
Proposed Use of Information: The
Coast Guard would use the information
to enhance maritime domain awareness.
Description of the Respondents: The
respondents are owners and operators of
vessels, MODUs, and floating facilities
which arrive on the OCS from foreign
ports and engage in OCS activities.
Number of Respondents: The rule
increases the number of respondents in
this OMB-approved collection by no
more than 144 respondents. See the
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’
section for more details on the
respondents affected by this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2259
Frequency of Response: The rule
increases the annual number of
responses in this OMB-approved
collection by no more than 144
responses. OCS units such as MODUs
and floating production facilities may
stay on the OCS for long periods, such
as a year or more, so we do not expect
these units to have more than one NOA
submittal per year.
Burden of Response: We estimate the
burden of this rule to be the preparation
and submission of the NOA. Based on
discussion in the ‘‘Regulatory Analysis’’
section of this final rule, we estimate
that it would take 30 minutes to prepare
and submit an NOA to the NVMC.
Estimate of Total Annual Burden: The
annual total burden of this rule would
be no more than 72 hours.
As required by 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), we
submitted a copy of the rule to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for its review of the collection of
information. On December 9, 2010,
OMB approved the revision (ICR Ref.
No. 201012–1625–002) to OMB Control
Number 1625–0100, which expires on
December 31, 2013. The section
numbers associated with the collection
of information are: §§ 146.103, 146.104,
146.215 and 146.405. Our estimate of
the total annual burden is unchanged
from the proposed rule to this final rule.
You are not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2260
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
H. Civil Justice Reform
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under section
2.B.2. Figure 2–1, paragraphs 34(a) and
(d), of the Instruction, and neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required. This rule outlines the
procedures that owners or operators of
floating facilities, mobile offshore
drilling units, and vessels will follow in
submitting notice of arrival information
to the Coast Guard’s National Vessel
Movement Center. This rule is
procedural and concerns the
documentation of vessels, falling under
paragraphs 34(a) and (d) of the
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order. Though
it is a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866, it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
List of Subjects for 33 CFR Part 146
Continental shelf, Marine safety,
Occupational safety and health,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 146, as follows:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
L. Technical Standards
PART 146—OPERATIONS
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
1. The authority citation for part 146
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1226; 43 U.S.C.
1333, 1348, 1350, 1356; Sec. 109, Pub. L. No.
109–347, 120 Stat. 1884; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 146.102 to read as follows:
§ 146.102
Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
Arrives on the OCS means when a
floating facility enters any OCS block
area for the purpose of engaging in
operations subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCS Lands Act.
OCS block area means the names
given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Enforcement (BOE) to define the OCS
areas used to facilitate management or
leasing on the OCS.
U.S., as used in the term, ‘‘U.S.
floating facility,’’ means a ‘‘floating
facility,’’ that is registered, documented,
or certificated under the laws of the
United States or that is not registered,
documented, or certificated under the
laws of the United States or any other
nation.
■ 3. Add § 146.103 to read as follows:
§ 146.103 Safety and Security notice of
arrival for U.S. floating facilities.
(a) General. At least 96 hours before
a U.S. floating facility arrives on the
OCS from a foreign port or place or from
a different OCS block area, excluding
those U.S. floating facilities arriving
directly from a U.S. port or place, to
engage in OCS activities, the owner or
operator of the floating facility, except
as provided in paragraph (f) of this
section, must submit the following
information to the National Vessel
Movement Center (NVMC):
(1) The location, latitude and
longitude, of the floating facility at the
time the notice of arrival (NOA) is
reported;
(2) The area designation, block
number or lease number, assigned under
30 CFR 250.154 for identification, where
the owner or operator of the floating
facility plans to perform OCS activities;
(3) The floating facility’s name, if any;
(4) The date when OCS operations of
the floating facility are expected to
begin and end;
(5) Names of the last two ports or
places visited and the associated dates
of arrival and departure;
(6) The following information for each
individual onboard:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Nationality;
(iv) Passport number or marine
documentation number (type of
identification and number);
(v) Position or duties on the floating
facility; and
(vi) Name of the port, or place, and
country where the individual embarked.
(b) Methods of submission. The notice
must be submitted to the NVMC by
electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure format using methods
specified in the NVMC’s Web site at
https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA.
Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently
submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of a
U.S. floating facility must revise and resubmit the NOA within the times
required in paragraph (e) of this section.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
An owner or operator does not need to
revise or re-submit an NOA for the
following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time
that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude
and longitude, of the floating facility
from the location at the time the NOA
was reported; or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or
duties on the floating facility.
(d) Required reporting time of an
initial NOA. The owner or operator of a
U.S. floating facility subject to this
section must submit an initial NOA:
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96
hours, owners or operators of a floating
facility must submit an initial NOA at
least 96 hours before the U.S. floating
facility arrives at the OCS location
where the owner or operator plans to
perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96
hours, owners and operators of a
floating facility must submit an initial
NOA at least 24 hours before the U.S.
floating facility arrives at the OCS
location where the owner or operator
plans to perform OCS activities.
(e) Required reporting time of an
update to an NOA. The owner or
operator of each floating facility subject
to this section must submit an NOA
update:
(1) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by 24
hours or more from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the floating facility must
provide an updated NOA as soon as
practicable but at least 24 hours before
the U.S. floating facility arrives at the
OCS location where the owner or
operator plans to perform OCS
activities; or
(2) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by less
than 24 hours from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the floating facility must
provide an update as soon as practicable
but at least 12 hours before the U.S.
floating facility arrives at the OCS
location where the owner or operator
plans to perform OCS activities.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing
vessel controls a U.S. floating facility
required to submit an NOA under this
subpart, the owner or operator of the
towing vessel, or lead towing vessel if
there is more than one, is responsible
for submitting only one NOA containing
the NOA information items required for
the towing vessels, under § 146.405, and
the U.S. floating facility under
paragraph (a) of this section.
(g) This section does not apply to U.S.
floating facilities merely transiting the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
waters superjacent to the OCS and not
engaged in OCS activities.
■ 4. Add § 146.104 to read as follows:
§ 146.104 Safety and Security notice of
arrival for foreign floating facilities.
(a) General. At least 96 hours before
a foreign floating facility arrives on the
OCS from a foreign port or place or from
a different OCS block area to engage in
OCS activities, the owner or operator of
the floating facility, except as provided
in paragraph (f) of this section, must
submit the following information to the
National Vessel Movement Center
(NVMC):
(1) The location, latitude and
longitude, of the foreign floating facility
at the time the NOA is reported;
(2) The area designation, block
number or lease number, assigned under
30 CFR 250.154 for identification, where
the owner or operator of the foreign
floating facility plans to perform OCS
activities;
(3) The foreign floating facility’s
name, if any;
(4) The date when OCS operations of
the foreign floating facility are expected
to begin and end;
(5) Names of the last two ports or
places visited and the associated dates
of arrival and departure;
(6) The following information for each
individual onboard:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Nationality;
(iv) Passport number or marine
documentation number (type of
identification and number);
(v) Position or duties on the foreign
floating facility; and
(vi) Name of the port, or place, and
country where the individual embarked.
(7) The date of issuance of the foreign
floating facility’s International Safety
Management certificate (ISM), if any,
and Document of Compliance certificate
and the name of the flag administration,
or its recognized representative, that
issued those certificates; and
(8) The date of issuance of the foreign
floating facility’s International Ship
Security certificate (ISSC), if any, and
the name of the flag administration, or
the recognized security organization
representing the flag administration,
that issued the ISSC.
(b) Methods of submission. The notice
must be submitted to the National
Vessel Movement Center by electronic
Notice of Arrival and Departure format
using methods specified at the NVMC’s
Web site at https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA.
Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently
submitted NOA information becomes
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2261
inaccurate, the owner or operator of the
foreign floating facility must revise and
re-submit the NOA within the times
required in paragraph (e) of this section.
An owner or operator does not need to
revise or re-submit an NOA for the
following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time
that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude
and longitude, of the floating facility
from the location at the time the NOA
was reported; or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or
duties on the foreign floating facility.
(d) Required reporting time of an
initial NOA. The owner or operator of a
foreign floating facility subject to this
section must submit an initial NOA:
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96
hours, owners or operators of a foreign
floating facility must submit an initial
NOA at least 96 hours before the foreign
floating facility arrives at the OCS
location where the owner or operator
plans to perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96
hours, the owner or operator of a foreign
floating facility must submit an initial
NOA at least 24 hours before the foreign
floating facility arrives at the OCS
location where the owner or operator
plans to perform OCS activities.
(e) Required reporting time of an
update to an NOA. The owner or
operator of a foreign floating facility
subject to this section must submit an
NOA update:
(1) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by 24
hours or more from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the foreign floating facility
must provide an updated NOA as soon
as practicable but at least 24 hours
before the floating facility arrives at the
OCS location where the owner or
operator plans to perform OCS
activities; or
(2) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by less
than 24 hours from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the foreign floating facility
must provide an updated NOA as soon
as practicable but at least 12 hours
before the floating facility arrives at the
OCS location where owners or operators
plan to perform OCS activities.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing
vessel controls a foreign floating facility
required to submit an NOA under this
subpart, the owner or operator of the
towing vessel, or lead towing vessel if
there is more than one, is responsible
for submitting only one NOA containing
the NOA information items required for
towing vessels, under § 146.405, and the
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2262
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
foreign floating facility under paragraph
(a) of this section.
(g) This section does not apply to a
foreign floating facility merely transiting
the waters superjacent to the OCS and
not engaged in OCS activities.
■ 5. Add § 146.200 to subpart C to read
as follows:
§ 146.200
Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
Arrives on the OCS means when a
MODU enters any OCS block area for
the purpose of engaging in operations
subject to the jurisdiction of the OCS
Lands Act.
OCS block area means the names
given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOE) to define the OCS
areas used to facilitate management or
leasing on the OCS.
■ 6. Add § 146.215 to subpart C to read
as follows:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
§ 146.215 Safety and Security notice of
arrival for U.S. or Foreign MODUs.
(a) General. At least 96 hours before
a MODU arrives on the OCS from a
foreign port or place or from a different
OCS block area to engage in OCS
activities, excluding those U.S. MODUs
arriving directly from a U.S. port or
place, to engage in OCS activities, the
owner or operator of the MODU, except
as provided in paragraph (f) of this
section, must submit the following
information to the National Vessel
Movement Center (NVMC):
(1) The location, latitude and
longitude, of the MODU at the time the
notice of arrival (NOA) is reported;
(2) The area designation, block
number or lease number, assigned under
30 CFR 250.154 for identification, where
the MODU owner or operator plans to
perform OCS activities;
(3) The MODU’s name and IMO
number, if any;
(4) The date when operations of the
MODU are expected to begin and end;
(5) Names of the last two ports or
places visited and the associated dates
of arrival and departure;
(6) The following information for each
individual onboard:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Nationality;
(iv) Passport number or marine
documentation number (type of
identification and number);
(v) Position or duties on the MODU;
and
(vi) Name of the port, or place, and
country where the individual embarked.
(7) The date of issuance of the
MODU’s International Safety
Management certificate (ISM), if any,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
and Document of Compliance certificate
and the name of the flag administration,
or its recognized representative, that
issued those certificates; and
(8) The date of issuance of the
MODU’s International Ship Security
certificate (ISSC), if any, and the name
of the flag administration, or the
recognized security organization
representing the flag administration,
that issued the ISSC.
(b) Methods of submission. The notice
must be submitted to the National
Vessel Movement Center (NVMC) by
electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure format using methods
specified in the NVMC’s Web site at
https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA.
Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently
submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of the
MODU must revise and re-submit the
NOA within the times required in
paragraph (e) of this section. An owner
or operator does not need to revise or resubmit an NOA for the following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time
that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude
and longitude, of the MODUs from the
location at the time the NOA was
reported; or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or
duties on the MODU.
(d) Required reporting time of an
initial NOA. The owner or operator of a
MODU subject to this section must
submit an initial NOA:
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96
hours, owners and operators of a MODU
must submit an initial NOA at least 96
hours before the MODU arrives at the
OCS location where the owner or
operator plans to perform OCS
activities; or
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96
hours, owners and operators of a MODU
must submit an initial NOA at least 24
hours before the MODU arrives at the
OCS location where the owner or
operator plans to perform OCS
activities.
(e) Required reporting time of an
update to an NOA. The owner or
operator of a MODU subject to this
section must submit an NOA update:
(1) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by 24
hours or more from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the MODU must provide an
updated NOA as soon as practicable but
at least 24 hours before the MODU
arrives at the OCS location where the
owner or operator plans to perform OCS
activities; or
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by less
than 24 hours from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the MODU must provide an
updated NOA as soon as practicable but
at least 12 hours before the MODU
arrives at the OCS location where the
owner or operator plans to perform OCS
activities.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing
vessel controls a MODU required to
submit an NOA under this subpart, the
owner or operator of the towing vessel,
or lead towing vessel if there is more
than one, is responsible for submitting
only one NOA containing the
information required for the towing
vessels, under § 146.405, and the MODU
under paragraph (a) of this section.
(g) This section does not apply to
MODU’s merely transiting the waters
superjacent to the OCS and not engaged
in OCS activities.
Subpart D—Vessels—Notice of
Casualty
7. Revise the heading in Subpart D to
read as set forth above.
■ 8. Add Subpart E to read as follows:
■
Subpart E—Vessels—Safety and
Security Notice of Arrival
Sec.
146.401 Applicability.
146.402 Definitions.
146.405 Safety and Security notice of
arrival for vessels arriving at a place on
the OCS.
Subpart E—Vessels—Safety and
Security Notice of Arrival
§ 146.401
Applicability.
This subpart applies to all U.S. and
foreign vessels, except those U.S.
vessels traveling directly from a U.S.
port or place, bound for a place on the
OCS and planning to engage in OCS
activities. Vessels under this subpart
include, but are not limited to, standby
vessels, attending vessels, offshore
supply vessels, pipelay vessels, derrick
ships, diving support vessels,
oceanographic research vessels, towing
vessels, and accommodation vessels.
This subpart does not apply to MODUs,
which are covered under § 146.215; nor
does it apply to floating facilities, which
are covered under §§ 146.103 and
146.104.
§ 146.402
Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
Arrives on the OCS means when a
vessel enters any OCS block area to
commence operations for which it has
submitted a Notice of Arrival under
§ 146.405(b)(2).
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 9 / Thursday, January 13, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
OCS block area means the names
given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and
Enforcement (BOE) to define the OCS
areas used to facilitate management or
leasing on the OCS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
§ 146.405 Safety and Security notice of
arrival for vessels arriving at a place on the
OCS.
(a) General. The owner or operator of
each vessel subject to this section must
submit an initial NOA to the National
Vessel Movement Center (NVMC):
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96
hours, at least 96 hours before the vessel
arrives at a place on the OCS from a
foreign port or place or from a different
OCS block area to engage in OCS
activities;
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96
hours and more than 24 hours, before
departure, or;
(3) If the voyage time is less than 24
hours, at least 24 hours before the vessel
arrives at a place on the OCS.
(b) Information required in an NOA.
The following information is required
from the owners or operators of vessels
submitting an NOA:
(1) All the information specified in 33
CFR Table 160.206 with the exception
of information required in items (2)(iii)
through (2)(vi) and item (6). Item (8) is
also not required except as pursuant to
the laws on vessel entry (19 U.S.C.
1434) and clearance (46 U.S.C. 60105).
Vessel owners and operators should
protect any personal information they
gather in preparing notices for
transmittal to the NVMC so as to
prevent unauthorized disclosure of that
information;
(2) The area in which they are
conducting their operations. This area
can be submitted as either the name of
the places, the BOE block numbers, or
the latitudes and longitudes of the
places on the OCS where operations are
being conducted; and
(3) If any person onboard, including a
crewmember, is not required to carry a
passport for travel, then passport
information required in Table 160.206,
items (4)(iv) through (vi), and (5)(iv)
through (vi), need not be provided for
that person.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA.
Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently
submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of that
vessel must revise and re-submit the
NOA within the times required in
paragraph (e) of this section. An owner
or operator does not need to revise and
re-submit an NOA for the following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time
that is less than 6 hours;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Jan 12, 2011
Jkt 223001
(2) Changes in the location, latitude
and longitude, of the vessel from the
location at the time the NOA was
reported; or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or
duties on the vessel.
(d) Methods of submission. The notice
must be submitted to the NVMC by
electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure format using methods
specified at the NVMC’s Web site at
https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(e) Required reporting time of an NOA
update. The owner or operator of each
vessel subject to this section must
submit an NOA update:
(1) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by 24
hours or more from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the vessel must provide an
update as soon as practicable but at least
24 hours before the vessel arrives at the
OCS location where the owner or
operator plans to perform OCS
activities;
(2) If the most recently submitted
NOA, or NOA update, differs by less
than 24 hours from the current
estimated time of arrival, the owner or
operator of the vessel must provide an
update as soon as practicable but at least
12 hours before the vessel arrives at the
OCS location where the owner or
operator plans to perform OCS
activities; or
(3) If the remaining voyage time is less
than 24 hours, the owner or operator of
the vessel must provide an update as
soon as practicable, but at least 12 hours
before the vessel arrives at a place on
the OCS.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing
vessel controls a vessel required to
submit an NOA under this subpart, the
owner or operator of the towing vessel,
or lead towing vessel if there is more
than one, is responsible for submitting
only one NOA containing the
information required for the towing
vessels and the vessel under its control.
(g) This section does not apply to
vessels merely transiting the waters
superjacent to the OCS and not engaged
in OCS activities.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
Robert J. Papp, Jr.,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commandant.
[FR Doc. 2011–569 Filed 1–12–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2263
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0675; FRL–9250–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Minnesota; Gopher Resource, LLC
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a request
submitted by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) on July 29,
2010, to revise the Minnesota State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for lead (Pb)
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The
State has submitted a joint Title I/Title
V document (joint document) in the
form of Air Emission Permit No.
03700016–003, and has requested that
the conditions laid out with the citation
‘‘Title I Condition: SIP for Lead NAAQS’’
replace an existing Administrative
Order (Order) as the enforceable SIP
conditions for Gopher Resource, LLC.
The existing Order was approved by
EPA on October 18, 1994. MPCA’s July
29, 2010, revisions were meant to satisfy
the maintenance requirements for the
1978 Pb National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS), promulgated at 1.5
micrograms per cubic meter, or 1.5
μg/m3.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective March 14, 2011, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by February
14, 2011. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–0675, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2551.
4. Mail: John Mooney, Chief,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John Mooney, Chief,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2254-2263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-569]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 146
[Docket No. USCG-2008-1088]
RIN 1625-AB28
Notice of Arrival on the Outer Continental Shelf
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard revises its regulations on Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS) Activities to enhance maritime domain safety and security
awareness on the OCS by issuing regulations which will require notice
of arrival for floating facilities, mobile offshore drilling units
(MODUs), and vessels planning to engage in OCS activities. This final
rule implements provisions of the Security and Accountability for Every
Port Act of 2006 and increases overall maritime domain awareness by
requiring owners or operators of United States and foreign flag
floating facilities, MODUs, and vessels to submit notice of arrival
information to the National Vessel Movement Center prior to engaging in
OCS activities.
DATES: This final rule is effective February 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2008-1088 and are available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet by going to https://www.regulations.gov,
inserting USCG-2008-1088 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking
``Search.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail Mr. Kevin Pekarek, Vessel and Facility Operating
Standards Division (CG-5222), Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1386, e-
mail Kevin.Y.Pekarek2@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Regulatory History
III. Basis and Purpose
IV. Background
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
VI. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
BOEMRE Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations.
DHS Department of Homeland Security.
FR Federal Register.
ISM International Safety Management.
ISSC International Ship Security Certificate.
MMS Minerals Management Service.
MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit.
NAICS North American Industry Classification System.
NOA Notice of Arrival.
NOA OCS Notice of Arrival on the Outer Continental Shelf.
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, 15 U.S.C. 272
note.
NVMC National Vessel Movement Center.
OCS Outer Continental Shelf.
OCSLA Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
OIRA Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
OMB Office of Management and Budget.
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
SAFE Port Act Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006,
Pub. L. 109-347, 120 Stat. 1884 (2006).
U.S.C. United States Code.
U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated.
II. Regulatory History
On June 22, 2009, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Notice of Arrival (NOA) on the Outer Continental Shelf
in the Federal Register (74 FR 29439). We received two sets of comments
on the proposed rule prior to the close of the comment period. One
additional set of comments was received after the close of the
[[Page 2255]]
comment period, responding to comments submitted earlier. No public
meeting was requested and none was held.
III. Basis and Purpose
Congress and the President enacted the Security and Accountability
for Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act), Public Law 109-347, 120
Stat. 1884, on October 13, 2006. This rule is in response to Section
109 of the SAFE Port Act,\1\ which requires publication, within 180
days of enactment, of regulations that ``update and finalize'' NOA
procedures for foreign vessels \2\ on the OCS. As required by the SAFE
Port Act, this final rule makes our regulations ``consistent with
information required under the Notice of Arrival Sec. 160.206 of title
33, Code of Federal Regulations as in effect on the date of enactment
of the Act.'' It adds NOA requirements for foreign vessels on the OCS.
It also extends those requirements to U.S. floating facilities, MODUs,
and vessels arriving on, and engaging in, OCS activities from foreign
ports or places, and moving from one OCS block area to another. In
addition to implementing the SAFE Port Act and expanding NOA
requirements, this rule enhances security by requiring U.S. and foreign
vessels, floating facilities, and MODUs arriving on and engaging in OCS
activities to report their arrival times and locations and information
regarding the vessels, voyage, cargo, and crew. Such information is
critical to maritime domain safety and security awareness and will
enable the Coast Guard to more effectively prevent or respond to a
safety or security concern on the OCS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 33 U.S.C. 1223 note (West 2009).
\2\ As defined in 1 U.S.C. 3 (and reiterated in part 140 of this
subchapter) a vessel is ``every description of watercraft or other
artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of
transportation on water.'' This definition includes those units we
propose to regulate with this rulemaking (i.e., floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels engaging in OCS activities).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Background
The legislative history for the SAFE Port Act relating to the
``update and finalize'' language found in section 109 provides no
specific direction for implementing that section. The Senate version of
the bill contains the section 109 provisions, and the House of
Representatives bill does not. The Congressional record does not
otherwise elucidate the requirement. The House of Representatives
Conference Report reveals only that both houses of Congress adopted
section 109 without additional discussion.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ H.R. 4954, 152nd Cong. (2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Coast Guard NOA OCS Regulations, 33 CFR 146.202
The Coast Guard does, however, have existing OCS NOA regulations,
which cover only MODUs. These were established on March 4, 1982, as
part of a final rule entitled, Outer Continental Shelf Activities (47
FR 9366). The Outer Continental Shelf Activities rule was in response
to enactment of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Amendments of
1978 and impacted requirements for design, equipment, operations,
manning, inspections, and investigations for facilities, vessels, and
other units (domestic and foreign) engaged in OCS activities.
However, the rule also had provisions specifically regarding MODUs.
Those provisions ensured that foreign MODUs operating on the OCS meet
the manning and safety standards comparable to those met by U.S. MODUs.
A provision of that rule, 33 CFR 146.202, specifically addresses NOA
and relocation of any MODU on the OCS. That section provides that an
owner of any MODU engaged in OCS activities must, 14 days before
arrival of the MODU on the OCS or as soon thereafter as practicable,
notify the District Commander for the area in which the MODU will
operate of: (1) The MODU's name, nationality, and designation assigned
for identification under 30 CFR 250.37; (2) the location and year that
the MODU was built; (3) the name and address of the owner, and the
owner's local representative, if any; (4) classification or inspection
certificates currently held by the MODU; (5) the location and date that
operations are expected to commence, and their anticipated duration;
and (6) the location and date that the MODU will be available and ready
for inspection by the Coast Guard. In addition, once a MODU is located
on the OCS, the owner must notify the District Commander before
relocating the MODU. The purpose of 33 CFR 146.202 is to assist
District Commanders in gathering information on MODUs prior to
inspection of those units.
Consistency With 33 CFR 160.206
The Coast Guard also has recently updated NOA rules. In response to
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Coast Guard published,
on February 28, 2003, the final rule entitled Notification of Arrival
in U.S. Ports (68 FR 9537). The rule enhanced notification of arrival
and departure requirements for U.S. and foreign vessels bound for, or
departing from, ports or places in the United States. The rule also
increased, from 24 hours to 96 hours, the advance notice a vessel must
submit to the National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC); described the
timeframes for updating an NOA; and added more information to the list
of items that must be submitted, as part of the NOA, to the NVMC.
Pursuant to that rule, specifically 33 CFR 160.206, the information
items submitted to the NVMC include: Vessel information; voyage
information; cargo information; information for each crewmember
onboard; information for each person onboard in addition to the crew;
operational condition of equipment; International Safety Management
(ISM) code notice; Cargo Declaration; and International Ship and Port
Facility code (ISPS) notice. The Coast Guard collects this information
to ensure, to the extent practicable, public safety, security, and the
uninterrupted flow of commerce.
Coast Guard Action
After considering section 109 of the SAFE Port Act and current NOA
rules, the Coast Guard has determined that section 109 of the SAFE Port
Act requires finalizing NOA OCS rules by adding to those requirements
found at Sec. 146.202 for MODUs. This new final rule is designed to be
consistent with the NOA requirements of Sec. 160.206 for vessels bound
for, or departing from, ports, or places in the United States.
This rulemaking is intended to comply with the section 109 mandate.
It also extends those NOA OCS requirements to U.S floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels (arriving on, and engaging in, OCS activities from
foreign ports or places) under the authority of the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1356 (2007), and the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act, 33 U.S.C. 1226 (2007). Extending the NOA OCS requirements
is essential for overall maritime domain safety and security awareness.
Moreover, obtaining knowledge of all individuals, floating facilities,
MODUs, and vessels engaging in OCS activities will better equip the
Coast Guard to prevent and respond to a safety or security incident on
the OCS. If the Coast Guard receives specific threat information for an
area, the knowledge obtained from these requirements will enable it to
know who is in the area, what they are doing, and how to contact them.
In addition, if a floating facility, MODU, or vessel has an incident,
the Coast Guard will be able to use this knowledge to better assess the
potential impacts of the event, respond to it, and seek additional
assistance in that or a nearby area when needed.
[[Page 2256]]
V. Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received two sets of comments from trade
associations in response to the NPRM. The Coast Guard considered all
comments filed. Below, we discuss in detail the public comments
addressing issues raised in the NPRM and our responses to those
comments.
1. Definition of ``OCS Activity'' and the Energy Policy Act
Two separate commenters suggested that the definition of ``OCS
activity,'' as used in the rule, be revised in light of amendments to
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), particularly those
amendments created by Section 388 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
Coast Guard Response. The definition of ``OCS activity'' is found
in the regulations at 33 CFR 140.10. Section 140.10 defines ``OCS
activity'' as ``any offshore activity associated with exploration for,
or development or production of, the minerals of the Outer Continental
Shelf.'' 33 CFR 140.10. This rulemaking was intended to implement the
SAFE Port Act and not the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which permits
leases, easements, or rights-of-way on the OCS for activities not
otherwise authorized under other laws, including: (1) Exploration,
development, production, or storage of oil or natural gas except in
areas prohibited by a moratorium; (2) transportation of oil or natural
gas, excluding shipping activities; (3) production, transportation, or
transmission of energy from sources other than oil or gas; and (3) use
of facilities for activities authorized under the Act. Energy Policy
Act of 2005 section 388, Public Law 109-58, 119 Stat. 744. Because the
goal of this rule was directed by the SAFE Port Act and was not to
alter the definition of ``OCS activity,'' as established in Title 33 of
the CFR, doing so would be beyond the scope of this rule.
2. NOAs for Moves Between OCS Locations
One commenter asks that we either modify the rule to eliminate the
need for NOAs for units moving between locations on the OCS or
coordinate the processing of the NOA requirements with those regarding
navigation safety (33 CFR 143.15) to reduce reporting burdens. A
separate commenter asserts the opposite, stating that vessels must
report their movements between OCS locations and ports and that this
requirement should also include vessels that do not moor offshore.
Coast Guard Response. Current regulations state that the owner must
notify the District Commander when a unit is relocated. The goal of the
SAFE Port Act is to improve maritime and cargo security through
enhanced layered defenses. Requiring revised NOAs each time there is a
change in position furthers that goal. However, the Coast Guard
believes it would be sufficient for an NOA to be required only when
MODUs, floating facilities, and vessels arrive from a foreign port or
place, or move a few miles from one OCS block area to another. OCS
block areas are used by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
Regulation and Enforcement (BOE)--formerly the Minerals Management
Service--to facilitate management and leasing on the OCS. They vary in
size depending on the OCS blocks the block areas contain. The OCSLA
permits a maximum size for an OCS block of 5,760 acres (9 square
miles).
For example, a MODU, floating facility, or vessel moving within the
Green Canyon block area would not have to submit a revised NOA; but if
moving from Green Canyon to the Walker Ridge block area, a revised NOA
would be required. Therefore, Sec. Sec. 146.103(a), 146.104(a),
146.215(a), and 146.405(a)(1) have been revised to reflect this change.
Definitions for ``arrives on the OCS'' and ``OCS block areas'' have
been added as new Sec. Sec. 146.102, 146.200, and 146.402.
For the alternative suggestion of coordinating processing of the
NOA requirements with those regarding navigation safety, this is not
possible because the reports are for different functions and are sent
to different offices. Coast Guard navigation safety requirements used
for lights and warning devices to prevent collisions at sea are sent to
the office of the District Commander. NOA requirements for maritime
security are submitted to the National Vessel Movement Center office
(NVMC).
3. Authorities
One commenter questions the use of the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act as an authority for this rule. That commenter notes that at the
time the Coast Guard proposed the existing NOA rules in 33 CFR 160.206,
this same commenter questioned the applicability of those rules to OCS
facilities as a ``port or place in the United States.'' The commenter
argues that our response to that comment indicates that we do not
interpret OCS locations to be a ``port or place in the United States''
for purposes of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act. As such, the
commenter says 33 U.S.C. 1223 and 1226 should not be listed as
authorities. If they are included, they ask the Coast Guard to clarify
its understanding of OCS facilities under the Act.
Coast Guard Response. 33 U.S.C. 1223 refers to ``a port or place
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States'' (rather than a
``port or place in the United States''). Also, 33 U.S.C. 1226 provides
authority to take actions to prevent or respond to acts of terrorism
against individuals, vessels, or structures ``subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States.'' 33 CFR 101.105 defines ``waters
subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.'' as including the following:
``in respect to facilities located on the Outer Continental Shelf of
the U.S., the waters superjacent thereto.'' These provisions underscore
the authority of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act in driving this
rule, which establishes regulations requiring notice of arrival for
United States and foreign flag floating facilities, MODUs, and vessels
prior to engaging in OCS activities.
4. Use of Information Reported
One commenter states that the information the Coast Guard requests
with this rule, particularly in Sec. 146.103(a)(6)(v), which requires
reporting positions or duties for individuals on board floating
facilities, will be used for other purposes, such as enforcement of
cabotage (coastal trade and/or navigation) or OCS employment
restrictions. This commenter requests that we remove this requirement.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard disagrees that this
information is being requested for cabotage, OCS employment
restrictions, or other non-NOA purposes. The information is being
requested for security purposes and reflects existing NOA requirements
in 33 CFR 160.206, as required by the SAFE Port Act. As noted,
maintaining situational awareness is the foundation of a comprehensive
security regime. This information will enable the Coast Guard to
respond to emerging threats on the OCS through such mechanisms as
critical notices to operators in the area that may be threatened. It
will also improve maritime safety by enabling the Coast Guard to better
protect mariners operating on the OCS.
5. Estimated Costs
One commenter states that costs should be modified to eliminate the
need for vessels moving between OCS locations to comply with NOA
requirements.
Coast Guard Response. As indicated above, we have clarified the
need for NOAs when moving between OCS locations. Vessels moving between
OCS block areas will still need to comply
[[Page 2257]]
with the NOA requirements. However, vessels moving from one location to
another within the same OCS block area do not have to submit NOAs.
6. Information Collection
One commenter suggests that the Coast Guard eliminate the need to
report certain information regarding persons onboard the arriving
vessels.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard disagrees with this
recommendation. We request this information to comply with the SAFE
Port Act (Table 160.206 item (4)(v)).
7. Coordinating With Other Rulemakings
One commenter states that the rulemakings on OCS Notice of Arrival
and the current development of notice of arrival and departure
requirements should be coordinated.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees and we have worked to
ensure uniformity between this and other relevant rulemakings.
8. Making NOA Information Accessible
One commenter states that some of the information reported under
the NOA, though not information relating to crew personnel, should be
publicly accessible and made available in real-time. In addition, the
commenter states that all information submitted under this regulation
should be accessible to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other
Federal agencies.
Coast Guard Response. General information about a vessel's arrival
or departure is normally made available by port authorities. Local
harbor masters have access to this data and are good sources of
information. In addition, such information is available to the public
through such sources as https://www.vesseltracker.com. More detailed
information in an NOA will be released in accordance with the Freedom
of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The Coast Guard already routinely
shares this information with other Federal, State, and local agencies
and coordinates with CBP.
9. Section 146.103--Vessels Under Tow
One commenter believes any vessels, facilities, or MODUs under tow
should provide separate NOAs from the towing vessel or offer an option
for the ``lead'' towing vessel to submit a single NOA for the combined
``tow.''
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees that the ``lead''
towing vessel could submit a single NOA for the entire ``tow.'' It is
the responsibility of the owner or operator of the unit being towed to
designate which towing vessel, if there is more than one, is the
``lead'' towing vessel and is responsible for submitting the overall
NOA. Section 146.103(f) has been revised to clarify that the ``lead''
towing vessel is responsible for submitting the overall NOA. Sections
146.104(f), 146.215(f), and 146.405(f) have also been revised to
reflect this change.
10. Section 146.103--Reference to ``Flag Administration''
One commenter recommends that the Coast Guard remove Sec.
146.103(a)(7) and (a)(8), which reference ``flag administration''
because that section is specific to U.S. floating facilities.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees with this comment.
Therefore, Sec. 146.103(a)(7) and (a)(8) have been removed.
11. Section 146.103--Change in Delay for Updated NOA
One commenter suggests the change in arrival time not requiring an
updated NOA in this section be changed from 6 hours to 24 hours (Sec.
146.103(c)(1)). This commenter believes that there is no substantive
difference in the risk posed by a delay of 24 hours versus a delay of 6
hours, given the remote locations and minimal direct threat.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard disagrees because the SAFE
Port Act requires us to issue regulations consistent with the existing
NOA regulations found in Title 33 of the CFR. Existing regulations in
33 CFR 160.208(b)(1) require vessels to submit revised NOAs if changes
in arrival or departure times are more than 6 hours.
12. Section 146.103(c)(2)
One commenter finds the wording in Sec. 146.103(c)(2) confusing
since the location of the floating facility would be known at the time
the report is made.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees and has revised Sec.
146.103(c)(2) to read: ``Changes in the location, latitude and
longitude, of the floating facility from the location at the time the
NOA was reported; or''. The Coast Guard also made similar changes in
Sec. 146.104(c)(2), Sec. 146.215(c)(2), and Sec. 146.405(c)(2).
13. Section 146.103(d)(1)
One commenter finds that Sec. 146.103(d)(1) and (d)(2) provides an
exception to the 96-hour reporting requirement created in Sec.
146.103(a) and that paragraph (d)(1) is redundant with paragraph (a).
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees that paragraph (d)(1)
is redundant, but it provides additional clarity by repeating this
requirement and then breaking out the differing requirements when the
voyage is more than 96 hours, as opposed to when the voyage is less
than 96 hours.
14. Section 146.103(f)--Towing of a Facility/Vessel
One commenter states that Sec. 146.103(f) should be removed
because it implies that the towing of a facility or vessel to an OCS
location is an ``OCS activity'' as defined in 33 CFR 140.10. The same
commenter asks that as an alternative to removing paragraph (f), we
address the possibility that multiple towing vessels may be involved in
the tow of a single facility/vessel and discuss how NOA requirements
would be met for a facility/vessel arriving on the OCS via a heavy lift
transport.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard does not believe that
paragraph (f) should be removed. In 33 CFR 140.10, ``OCS activity'' is
defined as ``any offshore activity associated with exploration for, or
development or production of, the minerals of the Outer Continental
Shelf.'' This is a broad definition that encompasses a towing vessel on
the OCS towing a facility/vessel on the OCS. The Coast Guard has
exempted vessels, floating facilities, and MODUs that are merely
transiting across the OCS and not engaging in OCS activities.
However, as noted above, the Coast Guard agrees it is possible to
have multiple towing vessels involved in the tow of a single facility/
vessel. We believe it is the responsibility of the owner or operator of
the unit being towed to designate which towing vessel will be the lead
towing vessel, if there is more than one, and therefore responsible for
submitting the overall NOA.
15. Section 146.103(g)--``Superjacent'' vs. ``Superadjacent''
One commenter recommends that the word ``superjacent'' be changed
to ``superadjacent'' in Sec. 146.103(g) for consistency within Title
33 and points to the definition of ``waters subject to the jurisdiction
of the U.S.'' at 33 CFR 101.105.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard disagrees that
``superjacent'' should be changed to ``superadjacent.'' Title 33 of the
U.S. Code uses ``superjacent'' and not ``superadjacent.'' We are using
the word ``superjacent'' in order to be consistent with its use in both
Title 33 and 33 CFR 101.105.
16. Section 146.215(a)(3)--Reporting the IMO Number
One commenter states that the Coast Guard should also require MODUs
to
[[Page 2258]]
report the IMO number in addition to the facility's name.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees and has modified Sec.
146.215(a)(3) as requested.
17. Section 146.215--Reporting ``Position or Duties''
One commenter states that the requirement for the description of
``position or duties'' of personnel on a facility or vessel (as
required in Sec. 146.215(a)(6)(v)) is irrelevant because the job
descriptions of industrial personnel would be difficult for the Coast
Guard to interpret.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard does not agree because the
SAFE Port Act requires us to issue regulations consistent with the
existing NOA regulations found in Title 33 of the CFR. Existing
regulations in 33 CFR Subpart C Table 160.206 item (4)(v) require
descriptions of positions or duties to be provided as part of an NOA.
18. Section 146.215--MODU NOA
One commenter states that MODUs should not be required to submit
anything other than a simple notice of arrival because they do not
present the risk of being weaponized or of smuggling merchandise or
individuals into the United States.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard does not agree. We believe
that MODUs arriving on the OCS from abroad present the same security
risk as OCS facilities and vessels.
19. Section 146.405--Interpreting ``Arrives on the OCS''
One commenter states that the phrase ``arrives on the OCS'' could
be interpreted in more than one way and that the interpretation affects
how the rule is applied.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard partially agrees that the
phrase could be interpreted in more than one way. We have added Sec.
146.102 to define ``arrives on the OCS'' to offer clarity to the issue.
New Sec. Sec. 146.200 and 146.402 have also been added to similarly
clarify the use of the phrase in these subparts.
20. Section 146.405(b)(1)--Exceptions to NOA Information
One commenter states that in Sec. 146.405(b)(1), it was unclear
why only item (2)(iii) of Table 160.206 was exempted and not items
(2)(iv) through (2)(vi).
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees that items (2)(iv)
through (2)(vi) should also be exempted and has revised Sec.
146.405(b)(1) accordingly. The information in items (2)(iv) through
(2)(vi) is not applicable and is not required for MODUs and floating
facilities and will not be required for vessels.
21. Section 146.405(b)(1)--Cargo Declaration
One commenter asserts that it is inappropriate to require a cargo
declaration for NOAs as stated in Sec. 146.405 since most vessels
subject to this subpart would not require customs clearance. A separate
commenter states the opposite, insisting that a cargo declaration form
should be necessary whenever a foreign vessel transports cargo to and
from a port and an OCS location.
Coast Guard Response. In those instances where foreign flag vessels
are transporting cargo to and from a U.S. port and a mineral extraction
facility pursuant to OCSLA, the owners/operators of those vessels are,
in fact, required to submit cargo declaration forms pursuant to CBP
regulations on vessel entry (as established under 19 U.S.C. 1434) and
clearance (as established under 46 U.S.C. 60105). However, the Coast
Guard agrees that it would be inappropriate for those vessels not
otherwise required to submit a cargo declaration form to have to submit
one for NOA purposes. Accordingly, we have revised Sec. 146.405 to
exempt item (8) from the information required in Table 160.206 for all
vessels except those foreign flag vessels subject to the CBP
regulations noted above.
22. Section 146.103
One commenter notes the language in new Sec. 146.103 (a)(2): ``The
area designation and block number or lease number, assigned under 30
CFR 250.154 for identification, where the floating facility plans to
perform OCS activities.'' The commenter points out that facilities are
not sentient and, therefore, cannot plan activities on the OCS.
Coast Guard Response. The Coast Guard agrees and has made the
necessary changes in the regulatory text to clarify (in sections
146.103, 146.104 and 146.405).
VI. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. The Office of
Management and Budget has reviewed it under that Order. It requires an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order.
Public comments on the NPRM are summarized in Part V of this
publication. We received no public comments that would alter our
assessment of the impacts discussed in the NPRM. We have adopted the
assessment in the NPRM as final. See the ``Regulatory Analyses''
section of the NPRM for more details. A summary of the assessment
follows.
This rulemaking requires certain U.S. and foreign owners or
operators of floating facilities, MODUs, and vessels to submit NOA
information to the NVMC prior to engaging in OCS activities.
Based on industry information from the National Offshore Advisory
Committee (NOSAC), we estimate that there are 7 to 12 arrivals on the
OCS each month for a total of 84 to 144 annual arrivals on the OCS each
year. We also estimate that approximately 95 percent of the floating
facilities, vessels, and MODUs operating on the OCS affected under this
rulemaking would be foreign flag.
The additional costs of this rulemaking to industry are the
proposed NOA reporting requirements. We estimate that one NOA requires
30 minutes to complete plus a transmittal fee of $2 per submission.\4\
Similar to other NOA reporting analyses, we use an average loaded wage
rate of approximately $31 per hour to estimate the labor costs for NOA
reporting activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Sources: (1) Collection of Information, OMB Control Number
1625-0100, ``Advance Notice of Arrival and Electronic Transmission
of Vessel Transit Data''; and (2) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
``Vessel Requirements for Notices of Arrival and Departure, and
Automatic Identification System'' [USCG-2005-21869].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the arrival data and the reporting time and cost
information, we estimate the annual cost of this rulemaking to industry
to be $1,470 to $2,520 (non-discounted). We estimate the present value
10-year cost of this rulemaking to industry to be $10,300 to $17,700 at
a 7 percent discount rate (rounded).
We expect the primary benefit of this rulemaking would be enhanced
situational awareness of activities on the OCS. This enhanced
situational awareness would assist the Coast Guard in evaluating
potential safety and security risks associated with these activities
and assist the Coast Guard in managing resources used to regulate these
activities and respond to incidents on the OCS.
[[Page 2259]]
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
In the NPRM, we certified under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that the proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. We received no public comments that would
alter our certification in the NPRM. We have found no additional data
or information that would change our findings in the NPRM. We have
adopted the certification in the NPRM for this final rule. See the
``Small Entity'' section of the NPRM for additional details.
We expect the rule would not have a significant economic impact on
any entities since the costs of this rulemaking are small and the cost
burden per NOA submission is only about $18.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please consult Mr. Kevin Pekarek, Vessel and
Facility Operating Standards Division (CG-5222); telephone 202-372-
1386. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for a collection of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). It would require a
revision to an existing collection. The following is a summary of the
burden associated with the revision.
As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information''
comprises reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and
other similar actions. The title and description of the information
collection, a description of those who must collect the information,
and an estimate of the total annual burden follow. The estimate covers
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing sources of
data, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection.
This rule amends the collection of information requirements for
owners and operators. The rule requires modifying the burden in the
previously approved collection under OMB Control Number 1625-0100.
Title: Advance Notice of Vessel Arrival.
OMB Control Number: 1625-0100.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The rule requires owners
and operators of vessels, MODUs, and floating facilities to submit an
advance notice of arrival electronically to the NVMC. This requires a
change in the previously approved OMB Collection 1625-0100 because it
expands the NOA requirement to include vessels, MODUs, and floating
facilities engaging in OCS activities.
This rule will not change the information collected in OMB
Collection 1625-0100. This rule will expand the number of respondents
to include owners and operators of vessels, MODUs, and floating
facilities that engage in OCS activities.
Proposed Use of Information: The Coast Guard would use the
information to enhance maritime domain awareness.
Description of the Respondents: The respondents are owners and
operators of vessels, MODUs, and floating facilities which arrive on
the OCS from foreign ports and engage in OCS activities.
Number of Respondents: The rule increases the number of respondents
in this OMB-approved collection by no more than 144 respondents. See
the ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' section for more details on the
respondents affected by this rule.
Frequency of Response: The rule increases the annual number of
responses in this OMB-approved collection by no more than 144
responses. OCS units such as MODUs and floating production facilities
may stay on the OCS for long periods, such as a year or more, so we do
not expect these units to have more than one NOA submittal per year.
Burden of Response: We estimate the burden of this rule to be the
preparation and submission of the NOA. Based on discussion in the
``Regulatory Analysis'' section of this final rule, we estimate that it
would take 30 minutes to prepare and submit an NOA to the NVMC.
Estimate of Total Annual Burden: The annual total burden of this
rule would be no more than 72 hours.
As required by 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), we submitted a copy of the rule
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its review of the
collection of information. On December 9, 2010, OMB approved the
revision (ICR Ref. No. 201012-1625-002) to OMB Control Number 1625-
0100, which expires on December 31, 2013. The section numbers
associated with the collection of information are: Sec. Sec. 146.103,
146.104, 146.215 and 146.405. Our estimate of the total annual burden
is unchanged from the proposed rule to this final rule.
You are not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have
[[Page 2260]]
taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions
and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order. Though it is a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
section 2.B.2. Figure 2-1, paragraphs 34(a) and (d), of the
Instruction, and neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required. This rule outlines the
procedures that owners or operators of floating facilities, mobile
offshore drilling units, and vessels will follow in submitting notice
of arrival information to the Coast Guard's National Vessel Movement
Center. This rule is procedural and concerns the documentation of
vessels, falling under paragraphs 34(a) and (d) of the Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects for 33 CFR Part 146
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Occupational safety and health,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 146, as follows:
PART 146--OPERATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 146 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1226; 43 U.S.C. 1333, 1348, 1350,
1356; Sec. 109, Pub. L. No. 109-347, 120 Stat. 1884; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 146.102 to read as follows:
Sec. 146.102 Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
Arrives on the OCS means when a floating facility enters any OCS
block area for the purpose of engaging in operations subject to the
jurisdiction of the OCS Lands Act.
OCS block area means the names given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOE) to define the OCS areas
used to facilitate management or leasing on the OCS.
U.S., as used in the term, ``U.S. floating facility,'' means a
``floating facility,'' that is registered, documented, or certificated
under the laws of the United States or that is not registered,
documented, or certificated under the laws of the United States or any
other nation.
0
3. Add Sec. 146.103 to read as follows:
Sec. 146.103 Safety and Security notice of arrival for U.S. floating
facilities.
(a) General. At least 96 hours before a U.S. floating facility
arrives on the OCS from a foreign port or place or from a different OCS
block area, excluding those U.S. floating facilities arriving directly
from a U.S. port or place, to engage in OCS activities, the owner or
operator of the floating facility, except as provided in paragraph (f)
of this section, must submit the following information to the National
Vessel Movement Center (NVMC):
(1) The location, latitude and longitude, of the floating facility
at the time the notice of arrival (NOA) is reported;
(2) The area designation, block number or lease number, assigned
under 30 CFR 250.154 for identification, where the owner or operator of
the floating facility plans to perform OCS activities;
(3) The floating facility's name, if any;
(4) The date when OCS operations of the floating facility are
expected to begin and end;
(5) Names of the last two ports or places visited and the
associated dates of arrival and departure;
(6) The following information for each individual onboard:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Nationality;
(iv) Passport number or marine documentation number (type of
identification and number);
(v) Position or duties on the floating facility; and
(vi) Name of the port, or place, and country where the individual
embarked.
(b) Methods of submission. The notice must be submitted to the NVMC
by electronic Notice of Arrival and Departure format using methods
specified in the NVMC's Web site at https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA. Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of a U.S. floating facility must
revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e)
of this section.
[[Page 2261]]
An owner or operator does not need to revise or re-submit an NOA for
the following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude and longitude, of the
floating facility from the location at the time the NOA was reported;
or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or duties on the floating
facility.
(d) Required reporting time of an initial NOA. The owner or
operator of a U.S. floating facility subject to this section must
submit an initial NOA:
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96 hours, owners or operators
of a floating facility must submit an initial NOA at least 96 hours
before the U.S. floating facility arrives at the OCS location where the
owner or operator plans to perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96 hours, owners and operators
of a floating facility must submit an initial NOA at least 24 hours
before the U.S. floating facility arrives at the OCS location where the
owner or operator plans to perform OCS activities.
(e) Required reporting time of an update to an NOA. The owner or
operator of each floating facility subject to this section must submit
an NOA update:
(1) If the most recently submitted NOA, or NOA update, differs by
24 hours or more from the current estimated time of arrival, the owner
or operator of the floating facility must provide an updated NOA as
soon as practicable but at least 24 hours before the U.S. floating
facility arrives at the OCS location where the owner or operator plans
to perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the most recently submitted NOA, or NOA update, differs by
less than 24 hours from the current estimated time of arrival, the
owner or operator of the floating facility must provide an update as
soon as practicable but at least 12 hours before the U.S. floating
facility arrives at the OCS location where the owner or operator plans
to perform OCS activities.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing vessel controls a U.S. floating
facility required to submit an NOA under this subpart, the owner or
operator of the towing vessel, or lead towing vessel if there is more
than one, is responsible for submitting only one NOA containing the NOA
information items required for the towing vessels, under Sec. 146.405,
and the U.S. floating facility under paragraph (a) of this section.
(g) This section does not apply to U.S. floating facilities merely
transiting the waters superjacent to the OCS and not engaged in OCS
activities.
0
4. Add Sec. 146.104 to read as follows:
Sec. 146.104 Safety and Security notice of arrival for foreign
floating facilities.
(a) General. At least 96 hours before a foreign floating facility
arrives on the OCS from a foreign port or place or from a different OCS
block area to engage in OCS activities, the owner or operator of the
floating facility, except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section,
must submit the following information to the National Vessel Movement
Center (NVMC):
(1) The location, latitude and longitude, of the foreign floating
facility at the time the NOA is reported;
(2) The area designation, block number or lease number, assigned
under 30 CFR 250.154 for identification, where the owner or operator of
the foreign floating facility plans to perform OCS activities;
(3) The foreign floating facility's name, if any;
(4) The date when OCS operations of the foreign floating facility
are expected to begin and end;
(5) Names of the last two ports or places visited and the
associated dates of arrival and departure;
(6) The following information for each individual onboard:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Nationality;
(iv) Passport number or marine documentation number (type of
identification and number);
(v) Position or duties on the foreign floating facility; and
(vi) Name of the port, or place, and country where the individual
embarked.
(7) The date of issuance of the foreign floating facility's
International Safety Management certificate (ISM), if any, and Document
of Compliance certificate and the name of the flag administration, or
its recognized representative, that issued those certificates; and
(8) The date of issuance of the foreign floating facility's
International Ship Security certificate (ISSC), if any, and the name of
the flag administration, or the recognized security organization
representing the flag administration, that issued the ISSC.
(b) Methods of submission. The notice must be submitted to the
National Vessel Movement Center by electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure format using methods specified at the NVMC's Web site at
https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA. Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of the foreign floating facility must
revise and re-submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e)
of this section. An owner or operator does not need to revise or re-
submit an NOA for the following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude and longitude, of the
floating facility from the location at the time the NOA was reported;
or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or duties on the foreign
floating facility.
(d) Required reporting time of an initial NOA. The owner or
operator of a foreign floating facility subject to this section must
submit an initial NOA:
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96 hours, owners or operators
of a foreign floating facility must submit an initial NOA at least 96
hours before the foreign floating facility arrives at the OCS location
where the owner or operator plans to perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96 hours, the owner or operator
of a foreign floating facility must submit an initial NOA at least 24
hours before the foreign floating facility arrives at the OCS location
where the owner or operator plans to perform OCS activities.
(e) Required reporting time of an update to an NOA. The owner or
operator of a foreign floating facility subject to this section must
submit an NOA update:
(1) If the most recently submitted NOA, or NOA update, differs by
24 hours or more from the current estimated time of arrival, the owner
or operator of the foreign floating facility must provide an updated
NOA as soon as practicable but at least 24 hours before the floating
facility arrives at the OCS location where the owner or operator plans
to perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the most recently submitted NOA, or NOA update, differs by
less than 24 hours from the current estimated time of arrival, the
owner or operator of the foreign floating facility must provide an
updated NOA as soon as practicable but at least 12 hours before the
floating facility arrives at the OCS location where owners or operators
plan to perform OCS activities.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing vessel controls a foreign
floating facility required to submit an NOA under this subpart, the
owner or operator of the towing vessel, or lead towing vessel if there
is more than one, is responsible for submitting only one NOA containing
the NOA information items required for towing vessels, under Sec.
146.405, and the
[[Page 2262]]
foreign floating facility under paragraph (a) of this section.
(g) This section does not apply to a foreign floating facility
merely transiting the waters superjacent to the OCS and not engaged in
OCS activities.
0
5. Add Sec. 146.200 to subpart C to read as follows:
Sec. 146.200 Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
Arrives on the OCS means when a MODU enters any OCS block area for
the purpose of engaging in operations subject to the jurisdiction of
the OCS Lands Act.
OCS block area means the names given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOE) to define the OCS areas
used to facilitate management or leasing on the OCS.
0
6. Add Sec. 146.215 to subpart C to read as follows:
Sec. 146.215 Safety and Security notice of arrival for U.S. or
Foreign MODUs.
(a) General. At least 96 hours before a MODU arrives on the OCS
from a foreign port or place or from a different OCS block area to
engage in OCS activities, excluding those U.S. MODUs arriving directly
from a U.S. port or place, to engage in OCS activities, the owner or
operator of the MODU, except as provided in paragraph (f) of this
section, must submit the following information to the National Vessel
Movement Center (NVMC):
(1) The location, latitude and longitude, of the MODU at the time
the notice of arrival (NOA) is reported;
(2) The area designation, block number or lease number, assigned
under 30 CFR 250.154 for identification, where the MODU owner or
operator plans to perform OCS activities;
(3) The MODU's name and IMO number, if any;
(4) The date when operations of the MODU are expected to begin and
end;
(5) Names of the last two ports or places visited and the
associated dates of arrival and departure;
(6) The following information for each individual onboard:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Nationality;
(iv) Passport number or marine documentation number (type of
identification and number);
(v) Position or duties on the MODU; and
(vi) Name of the port, or place, and country where the individual
embarked.
(7) The date of issuance of the MODU's International Safety
Management certificate (ISM), if any, and Document of Compliance
certificate and the name of the flag administration, or its recognized
representative, that issued those certificates; and
(8) The date of issuance of the MODU's International Ship Security
certificate (ISSC), if any, and the name of the flag administration, or
the recognized security organization representing the flag
administration, that issued the ISSC.
(b) Methods of submission. The notice must be submitted to the
National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC) by electronic Notice of Arrival
and Departure format using methods specified in the NVMC's Web site at
https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov/.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA. Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of the MODU must revise and re-submit
the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this section. An
owner or operator does not need to revise or re-submit an NOA for the
following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude and longitude, of the MODUs
from the location at the time the NOA was reported; or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or duties on the MODU.
(d) Required reporting time of an initial NOA. The owner or
operator of a MODU subject to this section must submit an initial NOA:
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96 hours, owners and operators
of a MODU must submit an initial NOA at least 96 hours before the MODU
arrives at the OCS location where the owner or operator plans to
perform OCS activities; or
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96 hours, owners and operators
of a MODU must submit an initial NOA at least 24 hours before the MODU
arrives at the OCS location where the owner or operator plans to
perform OCS activities.
(e) Required reporting time of an update to an NOA. The owner or
operator of a MODU subject to this section must submit an NOA update:
(1) If the most recently submitted NOA, or NOA update, differs by
24 hours or more from the current estimated time of arrival, the owner
or operator of the MODU must provide an updated NOA as soon as
practicable but at least 24 hours before the MODU arrives at the OCS
location where the owner or operator plans to perform OCS activities;
or
(2) If the most recently submitted NOA, or NOA update, differs by
less than 24 hours from the current estimated time of arrival, the
owner or operator of the MODU must provide an updated NOA as soon as
practicable but at least 12 hours before the MODU arrives at the OCS
location where the owner or operator plans to perform OCS activities.
(f) Towing vessels. When a towing vessel controls a MODU required
to submit an NOA under this subpart, the owner or operator of the
towing vessel, or lead towing vessel if there is more than one, is
responsible for submitting only one NOA containing the information
required for the towing vessels, under Sec. 146.405, and the MODU
under paragraph (a) of this section.
(g) This section does not apply to MODU's merely transiting the
waters superjacent to the OCS and not engaged in OCS activities.
Subpart D--Vessels--Notice of Casualty
0
7. Revise the heading in Subpart D to read as set forth above.
0
8. Add Subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E--Vessels--Safety and Security Notice of Arrival
Sec.
146.401 Applicability.
146.402 Definitions.
146.405 Safety and Security notice of arrival for vessels arriving
at a place on the OCS.
Subpart E--Vessels--Safety and Security Notice of Arrival
Sec. 146.401 Applicability.
This subpart applies to all U.S. and foreign vessels, except those
U.S. vessels traveling directly from a U.S. port or place, bound for a
place on the OCS and planning to engage in OCS activities. Vessels
under this subpart include, but are not limited to, standby vessels,
attending vessels, offshore supply vessels, pipelay vessels, derrick
ships, diving support vessels, oceanographic research vessels, towing
vessels, and accommodation vessels. This subpart does not apply to
MODUs, which are covered under Sec. 146.215; nor does it apply to
floating facilities, which are covered under Sec. Sec. 146.103 and
146.104.
Sec. 146.402 Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
Arrives on the OCS means when a vessel enters any OCS block area to
commence operations for which it has submitted a Notice of Arrival
under Sec. 146.405(b)(2).
[[Page 2263]]
OCS block area means the names given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOE) to define the OCS areas
used to facilitate management or leasing on the OCS.
Sec. 146.405 Safety and Security notice of arrival for vessels
arriving at a place on the OCS.
(a) General. The owner or operator of each vessel subject to this
section must submit an initial NOA to the National Vessel Movement
Center (NVMC):
(1) If the voyage time is more than 96 hours, at least 96 hours
before the vessel arrives at a place on the OCS from a foreign port or
place or from a different OCS block area to engage in OCS activities;
(2) If the voyage time is less than 96 hours and more than 24
hours, before departure, or;
(3) If the voyage time is less than 24 hours, at least 24 hours
before the vessel arrives at a place on the OCS.
(b) Information required in an NOA. The following information is
required from the owners or operators of vessels submitting an NOA:
(1) All the information specified in 33 CFR Table 160.206 with the
exception of information required in items (2)(iii) through (2)(vi) and
item (6). Item (8) is also not required except as pursuant to the laws
on vessel entry (19 U.S.C. 1434) and clearance (46 U.S.C. 60105).
Vessel owners and operators should protect any personal information
they gather in preparing notices for transmittal to the NVMC so as to
prevent unauthorized disclosure of that information;
(2) The area in which they are conducting their operations. This
area can be submitted as either the name of the places, the BOE block
numbers, or the latitudes and longitudes of the places on the OCS where
operations are being conducted; and
(3) If any person onboard, including a crewmember, is not required
to carry a passport for travel, then passport information required in
Table 160.206, items (4)(iv) through (vi), and (5)(iv) through (vi),
need not be provided for that person.
(c) Updates to a submitted NOA. Unless otherwise specified in this
section, whenever the most recently submitted NOA information becomes
inaccurate, the owner or operator of that vessel must revise and re-
submit the NOA within the times required in paragraph (e) of this
section. An owner or operator does not need to revise and re-submit an
NOA for the following:
(1) A change in submitted arrival time that is less than 6 hours;
(2) Changes in the location, latitude and longitude, of the vessel
from the location at the time the NOA was reported; or
(3) Changes to personnel positions or duties on the vessel.
(d) Methods of submission. The notice must be submitted to the NVMC
by electronic Notice of Arrival and Departure format using methods
specified at the NVMC's Web site at