Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards, 2124-2127 [2011-458]
Download as PDF
2124
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
5156, Daniel.Gittleson@FDA.HHS.GOV.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of October 18, 2010 (75
FR 63834), the Agency announced that
the proposed information collection had
been submitted to OMB for review and
clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned
OMB control number 0910–0073. The
approval expires on December 31, 2013.
A copy of the supporting statement for
this information collection is available
on the Internet at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Dated: January 6, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–455 Filed 1–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0017]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Voluntary National
Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection provisions of
the Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the collection of
information by March 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in
44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c)
and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards (OMB
Control Number 0910–0621—Extension)
The Program Standards define nine
essential elements of an effective
regulatory program for retail food
establishments, establish basic quality
control criteria for each element, and
provide a means of recognition for those
State, local, and tribal regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
programs that meet the Program
Standards. The program elements
addressed by the Program Standards are
as follows: (1) Regulatory foundation,
(2) trained regulatory staff, (3)
inspection program based on Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point
(HACCP) principles, (4) uniform
inspection program, (5) foodborne
illness and food defense preparedness
and response, (6) compliance and
enforcement, (7) industry and
community relations, (8) program
support and resources, and (9) program
assessment. Each standard includes a
list of records needed to document
compliance with the standard (referred
to in the Program Standards document
as ‘‘quality records’’) and has one or
more corresponding appendices that
contain forms and worksheets to
facilitate the collection of information
needed to assess the retail food
regulatory program against that
standard. The respondents are state,
local, and tribal government Agencies.
Regulatory Agencies may use existing,
available records or may choose to
develop and use alternate forms and
worksheets that capture the same
information.
In the course of their normal
activities, State, local, and tribal
regulatory Agencies already collect and
keep on file many of the records needed
as quality records to document
compliance with each of the Program
Standards. Although the detail and
format in which this information is
collected and recorded may vary by
jurisdiction, records that are kept as a
usual and customary part of normal
Agency activities include inspection
records, written quality assurance
procedures and records of quality
assurance checks, staff training
certificates and other training records, a
log or database of food-related illness or
injury complaints, records of
investigations resulting from such
complaints, an inventory of inspection
equipment, records of outside audits,
and records of outreach efforts (e.g.,
meeting agendas and minutes,
documentation of food safety education
activities). No new recordkeeping
burden is associated with these existing
records, which are already a part of
usual and customary program
recordkeeping activities by state, local,
and tribal regulatory Agencies, and
which can serve as quality records
under the Program Standards.
State, local, and tribal regulatory
Agencies that enroll in the Program
Standards and seek listing in the FDA
National Registry are required to report
to FDA on the completion of the
following three management tasks
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
2125
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices
outlined in the Program Standards: (1)
Conducting a program self assessment,
(2) conducting a baseline survey of the
regulated industry, and (3) obtaining an
independent outside audit (verification
audit). The results are reported to FDA
on Form FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA National
Registry Report’’ and Form FDA 3520,
‘‘Permission to Publish in National
Registry.’’ These forms are located in
Appendix I of the Program Standards
document. If a regulatory Agency
follows all the recordkeeping
recommendations in the individual
standards and their appendices, it will
have all the information needed to
complete the forms.
In April 2010, the Conference for
Food Protection approved changes to
the Program Standards. The changes
have been incorporated into a draft 2011
revision, which will be available at:
https://www.fda.gov/
retailfoodprotection. One change was to
provide an extension of time for
completion of the three management
tasks. Another change was the inclusion
of clarifying language in Standard 9 that
a jurisdiction may use its inspection
data to conduct its study of risk factor
occurrence. Although this was always
the intent in Standard 9, it was not clear
to jurisdictions that this was a viable
option.
FDA analyzed whether incorporation
of these changes alters its estimate of the
recordkeeping and reporting burdens.
FDA concluded that the changes will
lessen the annual recordkeeping burden
estimate because the management tasks
will be conducted on a less frequent
basis annually. Thus, based on its
experience with the Program Standards
over the past 3 years, FDA has reduced
its estimate of the hours per record to
94.29, from the previously estimated
157 hours per record in 2008. The
reduced recordkeeping burden hour
estimates are shown in table 4 of this
document. FDA notes that jurisdictions
that choose to analyze their inspection
data per the Standard 9 criteria will
enjoy a less resource intensive method
for tracking risk factor trends over time.
However, the Agency has not reduced
its estimate of 333 hours for Standard 9
shown in table 2 of this document. The
Agency will consider reducing this
estimate in a future information
collection request based on supporting
data it expects to receive in the future
from participating jurisdictions. The
two noted changes had no effect on the
reporting burden hour estimates shown
in table 2 of this document.
Recordkeeping
FDA’s recordkeeping burden estimate
includes time required for a State, local,
or tribal Agency to review the
instructions in the Program Standards,
compile information from existing
sources, and create any records
recommended in the Program Standards
that are not already kept in the normal
course of the Agency’s usual and
customary activities. Worksheets
(Appendices) are provided to assist in
this compilation. In estimating the time
needed for the program self-assessment
(Program Standards 1 through 8, shown
in table 1 of this document), FDA
considered responses from four state
and three local jurisdictions that
participated in an FDA Program
Standards Pilot study. Table 2 of this
document shows the estimated
recordkeeping burden for the
completion of the baseline data
collection and table 3 of this document
shows the estimated recordkeeping
burden for the verification audit.
TABLE 1—SELF ASSESSMENT
Hours per
record
Standard
Recordkeeping activity
No. 1—Regulatory Foundation ...................
No. 7—Industry & Community Relations ....
No. 8—Program Support and Resources ...
Self Assessment: (Appendix A) Completion of worksheet recording results of evaluations and comparison on worksheets1.
Self Assessment: (Appendix B–2 and B–4) 1 Completion of CFP Field Training Manual and Documentation of Successful Completion—Field Training Process; completion of summary worksheet of each employee training records2.
Self Assessment: (Appendix C 1) Completion of worksheet documentation .................
Self Assessment: (Appendix D 1) Completion of worksheet documentation of jurisdiction’s quality assurance procedures2.
Self Assessment: (Appendix E 1) Completion of worksheet documentation .................
Self Assessment: (Appendix F 1) ...................................................................................
Selection and review of 20 to 70 establishment files @ 25 minutes per file. Estimate
is based on a mean number of 45. Completion of worksheet.
Self Assessment: (Appendix G1) Completion of worksheet ..........................................
Self Assessment: (Appendix H 1) Selection and review of establishment files .............
Total .....................................................
........................................................................................................................................
No. 2—Trained Regulatory Staff ................
No. 3—HACCP Principles ..........................
No. 4—Uniform Inspection Program ...........
No. 5—Foodborne Illness Investigation ......
No. 6—Compliance Enforcement ...............
1 Or
16
19.3
4
19
5
19
2
8
92.3
comparable documentation.
will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
2 Estimates
TABLE 2—BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
Hours per
record
Recordkeeping activity
No. 9 Program Assessment ........................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Standard
Baseline Data Collection (Appendices I & J) Selection and inspection of randomly
selected statistical sample of 9 to 87 establishments from each of 9 facility types1.
333
1 Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type. Estimates will vary depending
on number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
2126
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 3—VERIFICATION AUDIT
Hours per
record
Standard
Recordkeeping activity
No. 9 ..........................................................................................................
Verification Audit (Appendices I & J)1 .............................
46.15
1
We estimate that no more than 50% of time spent to complete self assessment of all 9 Standards is spent completing verification audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than 9 standards require verification audits.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 4—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
FDA worksheets 2
Annual
frequency
per recordkeeping
Total annual
records
Hours per
record
Total hours
Appendices A through J ......................................................
500
1
500
94.29
47,145
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
47,145
1
2
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Or comparable documentation.
FDA bases its estimates of the number
of recordkeepers and the hours per
record on its experience with the
Program Standards over the past 3 years.
FDA estimates that approximately 500
regulatory jurisdictions will participate
in the Program Standards. There are
approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the
United States and its territories that
have retail food regulatory programs.
Enrollment in the Program Standards is
voluntary and, therefore, FDA does not
expect all jurisdictions to participate.
FDA bases its estimate of the hours
per record on the recordkeeping
estimates for the management tasks of
self assessment, baseline data collection,
and verification audit (tables 1, 2, and
3 of this document) that enrolled
jurisdictions must perform a total of
471.45 hours (92.3 + 333 + 46.15 =
471.45). As noted, based on its
experience with the Program Standards
over the past 3 years, FDA has reduced
its estimate of the number of
recordkeeping hours that enrolled
jurisdictions will perform annually to
94.29, from the previously estimated
157 hours per record in 2008. FDA
estimates that, annually, 500
recordkeepers will spend 94.29 hours
performing the required recordkeeping
for a total of 47,145 hours.
Reporting
FDA requires regulatory jurisdictions
that participate in the Program
Standards to submit two forms
annually: Form FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA
National Registry Report,’’ and Form
FDA 3520, ‘‘Permission to Publish in
National Registry.’’ Form FDA 3519
requires the name and address of the
jurisdiction; completion dates for the
self assessment, baseline survey
(original and update), and verification
audit; names of the person(s) who
completed the self-assessment,
verification audit, baseline survey,
baseline survey update, and action plan;
signature of the program manager; and
date the form was completed. Form FDA
3520 requires the name of the
jurisdiction, completion date of the self
assessment, date of the verification
audit report, name of the auditor,
signature and title of the official
completing the form, and date the form
was completed.
The reporting burden in table 5 of this
document includes only the time
necessary to fill out and send the forms,
as compiling the underlying information
(including self-assessment reports,
baseline surveys, outside audits, and
supporting documentation) is accounted
for under the recordkeeping estimates in
table 4 of this document.
FDA estimates the reporting burden
for this collection of information as
follows:
TABLE 5—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Form FDA No.
Annual
frequency
per response
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
500
500
500
1
1
3
500
500
1,500
0.1
0.1
0.1
50
50
150
Total ..............................................................................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
3519 .....................................................................................
3520 .....................................................................................
Conference for Food Protection Training Plan and Log .....
........................
........................
........................
........................
250
1
There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
FDA bases its estimates of the number
of respondents and the hours per
response on its experience with the
Program Standards over the past 3 years.
As explained previously in this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
document, FDA estimates that 500
regulatory jurisdictions will enroll in
the Program Standards. FDA estimates a
total of 12 minutes annually for each
enrolled jurisdiction to complete both
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
forms. FDA bases its estimate on the
small number of data elements on the
two forms and the ease of availability of
the information. FDA estimates that,
annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices
will submit one Form FDA 3519 for a
total of 500 annual responses. Each
submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour
per response for a total of 50 hours. FDA
estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory
jurisdictions will submit one Form FDA
3520 for a total of 500 annual responses.
Each of these submissions is estimated
to take 0.1 hour per response for a total
of 50 hours. FDA estimates that,
annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions
will submit three requests for
documentation of successful completion
of staff training using the CFP Training
Plan and Log for a total of 1,500 annual
responses. Each submission is estimated
to take 0.1 hour per response for a total
of 150 hours. Thus, the total reporting
burden for this information collection is
250 hours.
Dated: January 5, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–458 Filed 1–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0468]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Patent Term
Restoration, Due Diligence Petitions,
Filing, Format, and Content of
Petitions
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by February
11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Jan 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
OMB control number 0910–0233. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and
Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–
796–3792,
Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance. Patent Term
Restoration, Due Diligence Petitions,
Filing, Format, and Content of
Petitions—(OMB Control Number 0910–
0233)—Extension
FDA’s patent extension activities are
conducted under the authority of the
Drug Price Competition and Patent
Term Restoration Act of 1984 (21 U.S.C.
355(j)) and the Animal Drug and Patent
Term Restoration Act of 1988 (35 U.S.C.
156). New human drug, animal drug,
human biological, medical device, food
additive, or color additive products
regulated by the FDA must undergo
FDA safety, or safety and effectiveness,
review before marketing is permitted.
Where the product is covered by a
patent, part of the patent’s term may be
consumed during this review, which
diminishes the value of the patent. In
enacting the Drug Price Competition
and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
and the Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1988, Congress
sought to encourage development of
new, safer, and more effective medical
and food additive products. It did so by
authorizing the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (PTO) to extend the
patent term by a portion of the time
during which FDA’s safety and
effectiveness review prevented
marketing of the product. The length of
the patent term extension is generally
limited to a maximum of 5 years, and
is calculated by PTO based on a
statutory formula. When a patent holder
submits an application for patent term
extension to PTO, PTO requests
information from FDA, including the
length of the regulatory review period
for the patented product. If PTO
concludes that the product is eligible for
patent term extension, FDA publishes a
notice that describes the length of the
regulatory review period and the dates
used to calculate that period. Interested
parties may request, under § 60.24 (21
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2127
CFR 60.24), revision of the length of the
regulatory review period, or may
petition under § 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30) to
reduce the regulatory review period by
any time where marketing approval was
not pursued with ‘‘due diligence.’’
The statute defines due diligence as
‘‘that degree of attention, continuous
directed effort, and timeliness as may
reasonably be expected from, and are
ordinarily exercised by, a person during
a regulatory review period.’’ As
provided in § 60.30(c), a due diligence
petition ‘‘shall set forth sufficient facts,
including dates if possible, to merit an
investigation by FDA of whether the
applicant acted with due diligence.’’
Upon receipt of a due diligence petition,
FDA reviews the petition and evaluates
whether any change in the regulatory
review period is necessary. If so, the
corrected regulatory review period is
published in the Federal Register. A
due diligence petitioner not satisfied
with FDA’s decision regarding the
petition may, under § 60.40 (21 CFR
60.40), request an informal hearing for
reconsideration of the due diligence
determination. Petitioners are likely to
include persons or organizations having
knowledge that FDA’s marketing
permission for that product was not
actively pursued throughout the
regulatory review period. The
information collection for which an
extension of approval is being sought is
the use of the statutorily created due
diligence petition.
Since 1992, 12 requests for revision of
the regulatory review period have been
submitted under § 60.24. For 2007,
2008, and 2009, a total of three, or one
per year, have been submitted under
§ 60.24. Two regulatory review periods
have been altered. During that same
time period, two due diligence petitions
were submitted to FDA under § 60.30,
for an average of fewer than one per
year. There have been no requests for
hearings under § 60.40 regarding the
decisions on such petitions; however,
for purposes of this information
collection approval, we are estimating
that we may receive one submission
annually.
In the Federal Register of October 5,
2010 (75 FR 61493), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. No comments were
received on the information collection.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2124-2127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-458]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0017]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
provisions of the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by March 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (OMB
Control Number 0910-0621--Extension)
The Program Standards define nine essential elements of an
effective regulatory program for retail food establishments, establish
basic quality control criteria for each element, and provide a means of
recognition for those State, local, and tribal regulatory programs that
meet the Program Standards. The program elements addressed by the
Program Standards are as follows: (1) Regulatory foundation, (2)
trained regulatory staff, (3) inspection program based on Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles, (4) uniform
inspection program, (5) foodborne illness and food defense preparedness
and response, (6) compliance and enforcement, (7) industry and
community relations, (8) program support and resources, and (9) program
assessment. Each standard includes a list of records needed to document
compliance with the standard (referred to in the Program Standards
document as ``quality records'') and has one or more corresponding
appendices that contain forms and worksheets to facilitate the
collection of information needed to assess the retail food regulatory
program against that standard. The respondents are state, local, and
tribal government Agencies. Regulatory Agencies may use existing,
available records or may choose to develop and use alternate forms and
worksheets that capture the same information.
In the course of their normal activities, State, local, and tribal
regulatory Agencies already collect and keep on file many of the
records needed as quality records to document compliance with each of
the Program Standards. Although the detail and format in which this
information is collected and recorded may vary by jurisdiction, records
that are kept as a usual and customary part of normal Agency activities
include inspection records, written quality assurance procedures and
records of quality assurance checks, staff training certificates and
other training records, a log or database of food-related illness or
injury complaints, records of investigations resulting from such
complaints, an inventory of inspection equipment, records of outside
audits, and records of outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas and
minutes, documentation of food safety education activities). No new
recordkeeping burden is associated with these existing records, which
are already a part of usual and customary program recordkeeping
activities by state, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies, and which
can serve as quality records under the Program Standards.
State, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies that enroll in the
Program Standards and seek listing in the FDA National Registry are
required to report to FDA on the completion of the following three
management tasks
[[Page 2125]]
outlined in the Program Standards: (1) Conducting a program self
assessment, (2) conducting a baseline survey of the regulated industry,
and (3) obtaining an independent outside audit (verification audit).
The results are reported to FDA on Form FDA 3519, ``FDA National
Registry Report'' and Form FDA 3520, ``Permission to Publish in
National Registry.'' These forms are located in Appendix I of the
Program Standards document. If a regulatory Agency follows all the
recordkeeping recommendations in the individual standards and their
appendices, it will have all the information needed to complete the
forms.
In April 2010, the Conference for Food Protection approved changes
to the Program Standards. The changes have been incorporated into a
draft 2011 revision, which will be available at: https://www.fda.gov/retailfoodprotection. One change was to provide an extension of time
for completion of the three management tasks. Another change was the
inclusion of clarifying language in Standard 9 that a jurisdiction may
use its inspection data to conduct its study of risk factor occurrence.
Although this was always the intent in Standard 9, it was not clear to
jurisdictions that this was a viable option.
FDA analyzed whether incorporation of these changes alters its
estimate of the recordkeeping and reporting burdens. FDA concluded that
the changes will lessen the annual recordkeeping burden estimate
because the management tasks will be conducted on a less frequent basis
annually. Thus, based on its experience with the Program Standards over
the past 3 years, FDA has reduced its estimate of the hours per record
to 94.29, from the previously estimated 157 hours per record in 2008.
The reduced recordkeeping burden hour estimates are shown in table 4 of
this document. FDA notes that jurisdictions that choose to analyze
their inspection data per the Standard 9 criteria will enjoy a less
resource intensive method for tracking risk factor trends over time.
However, the Agency has not reduced its estimate of 333 hours for
Standard 9 shown in table 2 of this document. The Agency will consider
reducing this estimate in a future information collection request based
on supporting data it expects to receive in the future from
participating jurisdictions. The two noted changes had no effect on the
reporting burden hour estimates shown in table 2 of this document.
Recordkeeping
FDA's recordkeeping burden estimate includes time required for a
State, local, or tribal Agency to review the instructions in the
Program Standards, compile information from existing sources, and
create any records recommended in the Program Standards that are not
already kept in the normal course of the Agency's usual and customary
activities. Worksheets (Appendices) are provided to assist in this
compilation. In estimating the time needed for the program self-
assessment (Program Standards 1 through 8, shown in table 1 of this
document), FDA considered responses from four state and three local
jurisdictions that participated in an FDA Program Standards Pilot
study. Table 2 of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping
burden for the completion of the baseline data collection and table 3
of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the
verification audit.
Table 1--Self Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per
Standard Recordkeeping activity record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 1--Regulatory Foundation............... Self Assessment: (Appendix A) Completion of worksheet 16
recording results of evaluations and comparison on
worksheets\1\.
No. 2--Trained Regulatory Staff............ Self Assessment: (Appendix B-2 and B-4) \1\ Completion 19.3
of CFP Field Training Manual and Documentation of
Successful Completion--Field Training Process;
completion of summary worksheet of each employee
training records\2\.
No. 3--HACCP Principles.................... Self Assessment: (Appendix C \1\) Completion of 4
worksheet documentation.
No. 4--Uniform Inspection Program.......... Self Assessment: (Appendix D \1\) Completion of 19
worksheet documentation of jurisdiction's quality
assurance procedures\2\.
No. 5--Foodborne Illness Investigation..... Self Assessment: (Appendix E \1\) Completion of 5
worksheet documentation.
No. 6--Compliance Enforcement.............. Self Assessment: (Appendix F \1\)..................... 19
Selection and review of 20 to 70 establishment files @
25 minutes per file. Estimate is based on a mean
number of 45. Completion of worksheet.
No. 7--Industry & Community Relations...... Self Assessment: (Appendix G\1\) Completion of 2
worksheet.
No. 8--Program Support and Resources....... Self Assessment: (Appendix H \1\) Selection and review 8
of establishment files.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................. ...................................................... 92.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Or comparable documentation.
\2\ Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors
employed by the jurisdiction.
Table 2--Baseline Data Collection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per
Standard Recordkeeping activity record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 9 Program Assessment................... Baseline Data Collection (Appendices I & J) Selection 333
and inspection of randomly selected statistical
sample of 9 to 87 establishments from each of 9
facility types\1\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type.
Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number
of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
[[Page 2126]]
Table 3--Verification Audit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per
Standard Recordkeeping activity record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 9......................... Verification Audit (Appendices I & J)\1\........................... 46.15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We estimate that no more than 50% of time spent to complete self assessment of all 9 Standards is spent
completing verification audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than 9 standards require
verification audits.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
FDA worksheets \2\ Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeping records record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendices A through J.......... 500 1 500 94.29 47,145
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 47,145
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
\2\ Or comparable documentation.
FDA bases its estimates of the number of recordkeepers and the
hours per record on its experience with the Program Standards over the
past 3 years. FDA estimates that approximately 500 regulatory
jurisdictions will participate in the Program Standards. There are
approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the United States and its
territories that have retail food regulatory programs. Enrollment in
the Program Standards is voluntary and, therefore, FDA does not expect
all jurisdictions to participate.
FDA bases its estimate of the hours per record on the recordkeeping
estimates for the management tasks of self assessment, baseline data
collection, and verification audit (tables 1, 2, and 3 of this
document) that enrolled jurisdictions must perform a total of 471.45
hours (92.3 + 333 + 46.15 = 471.45). As noted, based on its experience
with the Program Standards over the past 3 years, FDA has reduced its
estimate of the number of recordkeeping hours that enrolled
jurisdictions will perform annually to 94.29, from the previously
estimated 157 hours per record in 2008. FDA estimates that, annually,
500 recordkeepers will spend 94.29 hours performing the required
recordkeeping for a total of 47,145 hours.
Reporting
FDA requires regulatory jurisdictions that participate in the
Program Standards to submit two forms annually: Form FDA 3519, ``FDA
National Registry Report,'' and Form FDA 3520, ``Permission to Publish
in National Registry.'' Form FDA 3519 requires the name and address of
the jurisdiction; completion dates for the self assessment, baseline
survey (original and update), and verification audit; names of the
person(s) who completed the self-assessment, verification audit,
baseline survey, baseline survey update, and action plan; signature of
the program manager; and date the form was completed. Form FDA 3520
requires the name of the jurisdiction, completion date of the self
assessment, date of the verification audit report, name of the auditor,
signature and title of the official completing the form, and date the
form was completed.
The reporting burden in table 5 of this document includes only the
time necessary to fill out and send the forms, as compiling the
underlying information (including self-assessment reports, baseline
surveys, outside audits, and supporting documentation) is accounted for
under the recordkeeping estimates in table 4 of this document.
FDA estimates the reporting burden for this collection of
information as follows:
Table 5--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Form FDA No. Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
respondents response responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3519............................ 500 1 500 0.1 50
3520............................ 500 1 500 0.1 50
Conference for Food Protection 500 3 1,500 0.1 150
Training Plan and Log..........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 250
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
FDA bases its estimates of the number of respondents and the hours
per response on its experience with the Program Standards over the past
3 years. As explained previously in this document, FDA estimates that
500 regulatory jurisdictions will enroll in the Program Standards. FDA
estimates a total of 12 minutes annually for each enrolled jurisdiction
to complete both forms. FDA bases its estimate on the small number of
data elements on the two forms and the ease of availability of the
information. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions
[[Page 2127]]
will submit one Form FDA 3519 for a total of 500 annual responses. Each
submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 50
hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions will
submit one Form FDA 3520 for a total of 500 annual responses. Each of
these submissions is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a
total of 50 hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory
jurisdictions will submit three requests for documentation of
successful completion of staff training using the CFP Training Plan and
Log for a total of 1,500 annual responses. Each submission is estimated
to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 150 hours. Thus, the total
reporting burden for this information collection is 250 hours.
Dated: January 5, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-458 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P