Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards, 2124-2127 [2011-458]

Download as PDF 2124 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796– 5156, Daniel.Gittleson@FDA.HHS.GOV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 18, 2010 (75 FR 63834), the Agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910–0073. The approval expires on December 31, 2013. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at https:// www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Dated: January 6, 2011. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–455 Filed 1–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0017] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection provisions of the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards. DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection of information by March 14, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the collection of mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Jan 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50– 400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796– 3793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document. With respect to the following collection of information, FDA invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (OMB Control Number 0910–0621—Extension) The Program Standards define nine essential elements of an effective regulatory program for retail food establishments, establish basic quality control criteria for each element, and provide a means of recognition for those State, local, and tribal regulatory PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 programs that meet the Program Standards. The program elements addressed by the Program Standards are as follows: (1) Regulatory foundation, (2) trained regulatory staff, (3) inspection program based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles, (4) uniform inspection program, (5) foodborne illness and food defense preparedness and response, (6) compliance and enforcement, (7) industry and community relations, (8) program support and resources, and (9) program assessment. Each standard includes a list of records needed to document compliance with the standard (referred to in the Program Standards document as ‘‘quality records’’) and has one or more corresponding appendices that contain forms and worksheets to facilitate the collection of information needed to assess the retail food regulatory program against that standard. The respondents are state, local, and tribal government Agencies. Regulatory Agencies may use existing, available records or may choose to develop and use alternate forms and worksheets that capture the same information. In the course of their normal activities, State, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies already collect and keep on file many of the records needed as quality records to document compliance with each of the Program Standards. Although the detail and format in which this information is collected and recorded may vary by jurisdiction, records that are kept as a usual and customary part of normal Agency activities include inspection records, written quality assurance procedures and records of quality assurance checks, staff training certificates and other training records, a log or database of food-related illness or injury complaints, records of investigations resulting from such complaints, an inventory of inspection equipment, records of outside audits, and records of outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas and minutes, documentation of food safety education activities). No new recordkeeping burden is associated with these existing records, which are already a part of usual and customary program recordkeeping activities by state, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies, and which can serve as quality records under the Program Standards. State, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies that enroll in the Program Standards and seek listing in the FDA National Registry are required to report to FDA on the completion of the following three management tasks E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2125 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices outlined in the Program Standards: (1) Conducting a program self assessment, (2) conducting a baseline survey of the regulated industry, and (3) obtaining an independent outside audit (verification audit). The results are reported to FDA on Form FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA National Registry Report’’ and Form FDA 3520, ‘‘Permission to Publish in National Registry.’’ These forms are located in Appendix I of the Program Standards document. If a regulatory Agency follows all the recordkeeping recommendations in the individual standards and their appendices, it will have all the information needed to complete the forms. In April 2010, the Conference for Food Protection approved changes to the Program Standards. The changes have been incorporated into a draft 2011 revision, which will be available at: https://www.fda.gov/ retailfoodprotection. One change was to provide an extension of time for completion of the three management tasks. Another change was the inclusion of clarifying language in Standard 9 that a jurisdiction may use its inspection data to conduct its study of risk factor occurrence. Although this was always the intent in Standard 9, it was not clear to jurisdictions that this was a viable option. FDA analyzed whether incorporation of these changes alters its estimate of the recordkeeping and reporting burdens. FDA concluded that the changes will lessen the annual recordkeeping burden estimate because the management tasks will be conducted on a less frequent basis annually. Thus, based on its experience with the Program Standards over the past 3 years, FDA has reduced its estimate of the hours per record to 94.29, from the previously estimated 157 hours per record in 2008. The reduced recordkeeping burden hour estimates are shown in table 4 of this document. FDA notes that jurisdictions that choose to analyze their inspection data per the Standard 9 criteria will enjoy a less resource intensive method for tracking risk factor trends over time. However, the Agency has not reduced its estimate of 333 hours for Standard 9 shown in table 2 of this document. The Agency will consider reducing this estimate in a future information collection request based on supporting data it expects to receive in the future from participating jurisdictions. The two noted changes had no effect on the reporting burden hour estimates shown in table 2 of this document. Recordkeeping FDA’s recordkeeping burden estimate includes time required for a State, local, or tribal Agency to review the instructions in the Program Standards, compile information from existing sources, and create any records recommended in the Program Standards that are not already kept in the normal course of the Agency’s usual and customary activities. Worksheets (Appendices) are provided to assist in this compilation. In estimating the time needed for the program self-assessment (Program Standards 1 through 8, shown in table 1 of this document), FDA considered responses from four state and three local jurisdictions that participated in an FDA Program Standards Pilot study. Table 2 of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the completion of the baseline data collection and table 3 of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the verification audit. TABLE 1—SELF ASSESSMENT Hours per record Standard Recordkeeping activity No. 1—Regulatory Foundation ................... No. 7—Industry & Community Relations .... No. 8—Program Support and Resources ... Self Assessment: (Appendix A) Completion of worksheet recording results of evaluations and comparison on worksheets1. Self Assessment: (Appendix B–2 and B–4) 1 Completion of CFP Field Training Manual and Documentation of Successful Completion—Field Training Process; completion of summary worksheet of each employee training records2. Self Assessment: (Appendix C 1) Completion of worksheet documentation ................. Self Assessment: (Appendix D 1) Completion of worksheet documentation of jurisdiction’s quality assurance procedures2. Self Assessment: (Appendix E 1) Completion of worksheet documentation ................. Self Assessment: (Appendix F 1) ................................................................................... Selection and review of 20 to 70 establishment files @ 25 minutes per file. Estimate is based on a mean number of 45. Completion of worksheet. Self Assessment: (Appendix G1) Completion of worksheet .......................................... Self Assessment: (Appendix H 1) Selection and review of establishment files ............. Total ..................................................... ........................................................................................................................................ No. 2—Trained Regulatory Staff ................ No. 3—HACCP Principles .......................... No. 4—Uniform Inspection Program ........... No. 5—Foodborne Illness Investigation ...... No. 6—Compliance Enforcement ............... 1 Or 16 19.3 4 19 5 19 2 8 92.3 comparable documentation. will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction. 2 Estimates TABLE 2—BASELINE DATA COLLECTION Hours per record Recordkeeping activity No. 9 Program Assessment ........................ mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Standard Baseline Data Collection (Appendices I & J) Selection and inspection of randomly selected statistical sample of 9 to 87 establishments from each of 9 facility types1. 333 1 Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type. Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Jan 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 2126 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices TABLE 3—VERIFICATION AUDIT Hours per record Standard Recordkeeping activity No. 9 .......................................................................................................... Verification Audit (Appendices I & J)1 ............................. 46.15 1 We estimate that no more than 50% of time spent to complete self assessment of all 9 Standards is spent completing verification audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than 9 standards require verification audits. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 4—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1 Number of recordkeepers FDA worksheets 2 Annual frequency per recordkeeping Total annual records Hours per record Total hours Appendices A through J ...................................................... 500 1 500 94.29 47,145 Total .............................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 47,145 1 2 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. Or comparable documentation. FDA bases its estimates of the number of recordkeepers and the hours per record on its experience with the Program Standards over the past 3 years. FDA estimates that approximately 500 regulatory jurisdictions will participate in the Program Standards. There are approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the United States and its territories that have retail food regulatory programs. Enrollment in the Program Standards is voluntary and, therefore, FDA does not expect all jurisdictions to participate. FDA bases its estimate of the hours per record on the recordkeeping estimates for the management tasks of self assessment, baseline data collection, and verification audit (tables 1, 2, and 3 of this document) that enrolled jurisdictions must perform a total of 471.45 hours (92.3 + 333 + 46.15 = 471.45). As noted, based on its experience with the Program Standards over the past 3 years, FDA has reduced its estimate of the number of recordkeeping hours that enrolled jurisdictions will perform annually to 94.29, from the previously estimated 157 hours per record in 2008. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 recordkeepers will spend 94.29 hours performing the required recordkeeping for a total of 47,145 hours. Reporting FDA requires regulatory jurisdictions that participate in the Program Standards to submit two forms annually: Form FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA National Registry Report,’’ and Form FDA 3520, ‘‘Permission to Publish in National Registry.’’ Form FDA 3519 requires the name and address of the jurisdiction; completion dates for the self assessment, baseline survey (original and update), and verification audit; names of the person(s) who completed the self-assessment, verification audit, baseline survey, baseline survey update, and action plan; signature of the program manager; and date the form was completed. Form FDA 3520 requires the name of the jurisdiction, completion date of the self assessment, date of the verification audit report, name of the auditor, signature and title of the official completing the form, and date the form was completed. The reporting burden in table 5 of this document includes only the time necessary to fill out and send the forms, as compiling the underlying information (including self-assessment reports, baseline surveys, outside audits, and supporting documentation) is accounted for under the recordkeeping estimates in table 4 of this document. FDA estimates the reporting burden for this collection of information as follows: TABLE 5—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1 Number of respondents Form FDA No. Annual frequency per response Total annual responses Hours per response Total hours 500 500 500 1 1 3 500 500 1,500 0.1 0.1 0.1 50 50 150 Total .............................................................................. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 3519 ..................................................................................... 3520 ..................................................................................... Conference for Food Protection Training Plan and Log ..... ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 250 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. FDA bases its estimates of the number of respondents and the hours per response on its experience with the Program Standards over the past 3 years. As explained previously in this VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Jan 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 document, FDA estimates that 500 regulatory jurisdictions will enroll in the Program Standards. FDA estimates a total of 12 minutes annually for each enrolled jurisdiction to complete both PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 forms. FDA bases its estimate on the small number of data elements on the two forms and the ease of availability of the information. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices will submit one Form FDA 3519 for a total of 500 annual responses. Each submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 50 hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions will submit one Form FDA 3520 for a total of 500 annual responses. Each of these submissions is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 50 hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions will submit three requests for documentation of successful completion of staff training using the CFP Training Plan and Log for a total of 1,500 annual responses. Each submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 150 hours. Thus, the total reporting burden for this information collection is 250 hours. Dated: January 5, 2010. Leslie Kux, Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2011–458 Filed 1–11–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0468] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Patent Term Restoration, Due Diligence Petitions, Filing, Format, and Content of Petitions AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by February 11, 2011. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:25 Jan 11, 2011 Jkt 223001 OMB control number 0910–0233. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301– 796–3792, Elizabeth.Berbakos@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Patent Term Restoration, Due Diligence Petitions, Filing, Format, and Content of Petitions—(OMB Control Number 0910– 0233)—Extension FDA’s patent extension activities are conducted under the authority of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (21 U.S.C. 355(j)) and the Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1988 (35 U.S.C. 156). New human drug, animal drug, human biological, medical device, food additive, or color additive products regulated by the FDA must undergo FDA safety, or safety and effectiveness, review before marketing is permitted. Where the product is covered by a patent, part of the patent’s term may be consumed during this review, which diminishes the value of the patent. In enacting the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 and the Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1988, Congress sought to encourage development of new, safer, and more effective medical and food additive products. It did so by authorizing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to extend the patent term by a portion of the time during which FDA’s safety and effectiveness review prevented marketing of the product. The length of the patent term extension is generally limited to a maximum of 5 years, and is calculated by PTO based on a statutory formula. When a patent holder submits an application for patent term extension to PTO, PTO requests information from FDA, including the length of the regulatory review period for the patented product. If PTO concludes that the product is eligible for patent term extension, FDA publishes a notice that describes the length of the regulatory review period and the dates used to calculate that period. Interested parties may request, under § 60.24 (21 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2127 CFR 60.24), revision of the length of the regulatory review period, or may petition under § 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30) to reduce the regulatory review period by any time where marketing approval was not pursued with ‘‘due diligence.’’ The statute defines due diligence as ‘‘that degree of attention, continuous directed effort, and timeliness as may reasonably be expected from, and are ordinarily exercised by, a person during a regulatory review period.’’ As provided in § 60.30(c), a due diligence petition ‘‘shall set forth sufficient facts, including dates if possible, to merit an investigation by FDA of whether the applicant acted with due diligence.’’ Upon receipt of a due diligence petition, FDA reviews the petition and evaluates whether any change in the regulatory review period is necessary. If so, the corrected regulatory review period is published in the Federal Register. A due diligence petitioner not satisfied with FDA’s decision regarding the petition may, under § 60.40 (21 CFR 60.40), request an informal hearing for reconsideration of the due diligence determination. Petitioners are likely to include persons or organizations having knowledge that FDA’s marketing permission for that product was not actively pursued throughout the regulatory review period. The information collection for which an extension of approval is being sought is the use of the statutorily created due diligence petition. Since 1992, 12 requests for revision of the regulatory review period have been submitted under § 60.24. For 2007, 2008, and 2009, a total of three, or one per year, have been submitted under § 60.24. Two regulatory review periods have been altered. During that same time period, two due diligence petitions were submitted to FDA under § 60.30, for an average of fewer than one per year. There have been no requests for hearings under § 60.40 regarding the decisions on such petitions; however, for purposes of this information collection approval, we are estimating that we may receive one submission annually. In the Federal Register of October 5, 2010 (75 FR 61493), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were received on the information collection. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2124-2127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0017]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program 
Standards

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain 
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the 
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, 
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of 
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the 
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection 
provisions of the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program 
Standards.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection 
of information by March 14, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information 
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the 
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket 
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal 
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. 
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of 
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a 
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) 
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal 
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including 
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, 
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with 
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection 
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA 
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection 
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's 
functions, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when 
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (OMB 
Control Number 0910-0621--Extension)

    The Program Standards define nine essential elements of an 
effective regulatory program for retail food establishments, establish 
basic quality control criteria for each element, and provide a means of 
recognition for those State, local, and tribal regulatory programs that 
meet the Program Standards. The program elements addressed by the 
Program Standards are as follows: (1) Regulatory foundation, (2) 
trained regulatory staff, (3) inspection program based on Hazard 
Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles, (4) uniform 
inspection program, (5) foodborne illness and food defense preparedness 
and response, (6) compliance and enforcement, (7) industry and 
community relations, (8) program support and resources, and (9) program 
assessment. Each standard includes a list of records needed to document 
compliance with the standard (referred to in the Program Standards 
document as ``quality records'') and has one or more corresponding 
appendices that contain forms and worksheets to facilitate the 
collection of information needed to assess the retail food regulatory 
program against that standard. The respondents are state, local, and 
tribal government Agencies. Regulatory Agencies may use existing, 
available records or may choose to develop and use alternate forms and 
worksheets that capture the same information.
    In the course of their normal activities, State, local, and tribal 
regulatory Agencies already collect and keep on file many of the 
records needed as quality records to document compliance with each of 
the Program Standards. Although the detail and format in which this 
information is collected and recorded may vary by jurisdiction, records 
that are kept as a usual and customary part of normal Agency activities 
include inspection records, written quality assurance procedures and 
records of quality assurance checks, staff training certificates and 
other training records, a log or database of food-related illness or 
injury complaints, records of investigations resulting from such 
complaints, an inventory of inspection equipment, records of outside 
audits, and records of outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas and 
minutes, documentation of food safety education activities). No new 
recordkeeping burden is associated with these existing records, which 
are already a part of usual and customary program recordkeeping 
activities by state, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies, and which 
can serve as quality records under the Program Standards.
    State, local, and tribal regulatory Agencies that enroll in the 
Program Standards and seek listing in the FDA National Registry are 
required to report to FDA on the completion of the following three 
management tasks

[[Page 2125]]

outlined in the Program Standards: (1) Conducting a program self 
assessment, (2) conducting a baseline survey of the regulated industry, 
and (3) obtaining an independent outside audit (verification audit). 
The results are reported to FDA on Form FDA 3519, ``FDA National 
Registry Report'' and Form FDA 3520, ``Permission to Publish in 
National Registry.'' These forms are located in Appendix I of the 
Program Standards document. If a regulatory Agency follows all the 
recordkeeping recommendations in the individual standards and their 
appendices, it will have all the information needed to complete the 
forms.
    In April 2010, the Conference for Food Protection approved changes 
to the Program Standards. The changes have been incorporated into a 
draft 2011 revision, which will be available at: https://www.fda.gov/retailfoodprotection. One change was to provide an extension of time 
for completion of the three management tasks. Another change was the 
inclusion of clarifying language in Standard 9 that a jurisdiction may 
use its inspection data to conduct its study of risk factor occurrence. 
Although this was always the intent in Standard 9, it was not clear to 
jurisdictions that this was a viable option.
    FDA analyzed whether incorporation of these changes alters its 
estimate of the recordkeeping and reporting burdens. FDA concluded that 
the changes will lessen the annual recordkeeping burden estimate 
because the management tasks will be conducted on a less frequent basis 
annually. Thus, based on its experience with the Program Standards over 
the past 3 years, FDA has reduced its estimate of the hours per record 
to 94.29, from the previously estimated 157 hours per record in 2008. 
The reduced recordkeeping burden hour estimates are shown in table 4 of 
this document. FDA notes that jurisdictions that choose to analyze 
their inspection data per the Standard 9 criteria will enjoy a less 
resource intensive method for tracking risk factor trends over time. 
However, the Agency has not reduced its estimate of 333 hours for 
Standard 9 shown in table 2 of this document. The Agency will consider 
reducing this estimate in a future information collection request based 
on supporting data it expects to receive in the future from 
participating jurisdictions. The two noted changes had no effect on the 
reporting burden hour estimates shown in table 2 of this document.

Recordkeeping

    FDA's recordkeeping burden estimate includes time required for a 
State, local, or tribal Agency to review the instructions in the 
Program Standards, compile information from existing sources, and 
create any records recommended in the Program Standards that are not 
already kept in the normal course of the Agency's usual and customary 
activities. Worksheets (Appendices) are provided to assist in this 
compilation. In estimating the time needed for the program self-
assessment (Program Standards 1 through 8, shown in table 1 of this 
document), FDA considered responses from four state and three local 
jurisdictions that participated in an FDA Program Standards Pilot 
study. Table 2 of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping 
burden for the completion of the baseline data collection and table 3 
of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the 
verification audit.

                                            Table 1--Self Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Hours per
                  Standard                                   Recordkeeping activity                     record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 1--Regulatory Foundation...............  Self Assessment: (Appendix A) Completion of worksheet            16
                                              recording results of evaluations and comparison on
                                              worksheets\1\.
No. 2--Trained Regulatory Staff............  Self Assessment: (Appendix B-2 and B-4) \1\ Completion         19.3
                                              of CFP Field Training Manual and Documentation of
                                              Successful Completion--Field Training Process;
                                              completion of summary worksheet of each employee
                                              training records\2\.
No. 3--HACCP Principles....................  Self Assessment: (Appendix C \1\) Completion of                   4
                                              worksheet documentation.
No. 4--Uniform Inspection Program..........  Self Assessment: (Appendix D \1\) Completion of                  19
                                              worksheet documentation of jurisdiction's quality
                                              assurance procedures\2\.
No. 5--Foodborne Illness Investigation.....  Self Assessment: (Appendix E \1\) Completion of                   5
                                              worksheet documentation.
No. 6--Compliance Enforcement..............  Self Assessment: (Appendix F \1\).....................           19
                                             Selection and review of 20 to 70 establishment files @
                                              25 minutes per file. Estimate is based on a mean
                                              number of 45. Completion of worksheet.
No. 7--Industry & Community Relations......  Self Assessment: (Appendix G\1\) Completion of                    2
                                              worksheet.
No. 8--Program Support and Resources.......  Self Assessment: (Appendix H \1\) Selection and review            8
                                              of establishment files.
                                            --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total..................................  ......................................................         92.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Or comparable documentation.
\2\ Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors
  employed by the jurisdiction.


                                        Table 2--Baseline Data Collection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Hours per
                  Standard                                   Recordkeeping activity                     record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 9 Program Assessment...................  Baseline Data Collection (Appendices I & J) Selection           333
                                              and inspection of randomly selected statistical
                                              sample of 9 to 87 establishments from each of 9
                                              facility types\1\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type.
  Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number
  of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.


[[Page 2126]]


                                           Table 3--Verification Audit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Hours per
           Standard                                    Recordkeeping activity                           record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 9.........................  Verification Audit (Appendices I & J)\1\...........................        46.15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We estimate that no more than 50% of time spent to complete self assessment of all 9 Standards is spent
  completing verification audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than 9 standards require
  verification audits.

    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                               Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Annual
       FDA worksheets \2\            Number of     frequency per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                   recordkeepers   recordkeeping      records         record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendices A through J..........             500               1             500           94.29          47,145
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............          47,145
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.
\2\ Or comparable documentation.

    FDA bases its estimates of the number of recordkeepers and the 
hours per record on its experience with the Program Standards over the 
past 3 years. FDA estimates that approximately 500 regulatory 
jurisdictions will participate in the Program Standards. There are 
approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the United States and its 
territories that have retail food regulatory programs. Enrollment in 
the Program Standards is voluntary and, therefore, FDA does not expect 
all jurisdictions to participate.
    FDA bases its estimate of the hours per record on the recordkeeping 
estimates for the management tasks of self assessment, baseline data 
collection, and verification audit (tables 1, 2, and 3 of this 
document) that enrolled jurisdictions must perform a total of 471.45 
hours (92.3 + 333 + 46.15 = 471.45). As noted, based on its experience 
with the Program Standards over the past 3 years, FDA has reduced its 
estimate of the number of recordkeeping hours that enrolled 
jurisdictions will perform annually to 94.29, from the previously 
estimated 157 hours per record in 2008. FDA estimates that, annually, 
500 recordkeepers will spend 94.29 hours performing the required 
recordkeeping for a total of 47,145 hours.

Reporting

    FDA requires regulatory jurisdictions that participate in the 
Program Standards to submit two forms annually: Form FDA 3519, ``FDA 
National Registry Report,'' and Form FDA 3520, ``Permission to Publish 
in National Registry.'' Form FDA 3519 requires the name and address of 
the jurisdiction; completion dates for the self assessment, baseline 
survey (original and update), and verification audit; names of the 
person(s) who completed the self-assessment, verification audit, 
baseline survey, baseline survey update, and action plan; signature of 
the program manager; and date the form was completed. Form FDA 3520 
requires the name of the jurisdiction, completion date of the self 
assessment, date of the verification audit report, name of the auditor, 
signature and title of the official completing the form, and date the 
form was completed.
    The reporting burden in table 5 of this document includes only the 
time necessary to fill out and send the forms, as compiling the 
underlying information (including self-assessment reports, baseline 
surveys, outside audits, and supporting documentation) is accounted for 
under the recordkeeping estimates in table 4 of this document.
    FDA estimates the reporting burden for this collection of 
information as follows:

                                 Table 5--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Annual
          Form FDA No.               Number of     frequency per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                    respondents      response        responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3519............................             500               1             500             0.1              50
3520............................             500               1             500             0.1              50
Conference for Food Protection               500               3           1,500             0.1             150
 Training Plan and Log..........
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............             250
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    FDA bases its estimates of the number of respondents and the hours 
per response on its experience with the Program Standards over the past 
3 years. As explained previously in this document, FDA estimates that 
500 regulatory jurisdictions will enroll in the Program Standards. FDA 
estimates a total of 12 minutes annually for each enrolled jurisdiction 
to complete both forms. FDA bases its estimate on the small number of 
data elements on the two forms and the ease of availability of the 
information. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions

[[Page 2127]]

will submit one Form FDA 3519 for a total of 500 annual responses. Each 
submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 50 
hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions will 
submit one Form FDA 3520 for a total of 500 annual responses. Each of 
these submissions is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a 
total of 50 hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory 
jurisdictions will submit three requests for documentation of 
successful completion of staff training using the CFP Training Plan and 
Log for a total of 1,500 annual responses. Each submission is estimated 
to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of 150 hours. Thus, the total 
reporting burden for this information collection is 250 hours.

    Dated: January 5, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-458 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.