FY 2010 Annual Compliance Report; Comment Request, 1471-1472 [2011-157]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Notices
218–0136, or via e-mail at
Connie.Downs@opic.gov.
Dated: January 6, 2011.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–323 Filed 1–6–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. ACR2010; Order No. 636]
FY 2010 Annual Compliance Report;
Comment Request
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service has filed
an Annual Compliance Report on the
costs, revenues, rates, and quality of
service associated with its products in
fiscal year 2010. Within 90 days, the
Commission must evaluate that
information and issue its determination
as to whether rates were in compliance
with title 39, chapter 36 and whether
service standards in effect were met. To
assist in this, the Commission seeks
public comments on the Postal Service’s
Annual Compliance Report.
DATES: Comments are due: February 2,
2011. Reply comments are due:
February 17, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should
contact the person identified in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
II. Overview of the Postal Service’s FY 2010
ACR Filing
III. Procedural Steps
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On December 29, 2010, the United
States Postal Service (Postal Service)
filed with the Commission, pursuant to
39 U.S.C. 3652, its Annual Compliance
Report (ACR) for fiscal year 2010.
Section 3652 requires submission of
data and information on the costs,
revenues, rates, and quality of service
associated with postal products within
90 days of the closing of each fiscal
year. In conformance with other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
statutory provisions and Commission
rules, the ACR filing includes the Postal
Service’s FY 2010 Comprehensive
Statement, its FY 2010 annual report to
the Secretary of the Treasury on the
Competitive Products Fund, and certain
related Competitive Products Fund
material. See, respectively, 39 U.S.C.
3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR
3060.20–23. In line with past practice,
some of the material in the FY 2010
ACR appears in non-public annexes.
The filing triggers a statutory review
process culminating in the
Commission’s issuance of an Annual
Compliance Determination (ACD)
assessing compliance of Postal Service
products offered during FY 2010 with
applicable title 39 requirements.
The instant filing marks the fourth
time since passage of the Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act
(PAEA) of 2006 that this reporting and
oversight process has been used. This
means, as the Postal Service observes in
its current filing, that many of the
transitional issues associated with
earlier filings have been overtaken by
full implementation of other PAEA
provisions or have diminished in
significance. However, the Postal
Service notes that some transitional
issues remain, including incorporating
financial results for certain activities
formerly considered ‘‘nonpostal’’ into
the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA)
report in accordance with Commission
Order No. 391. FY 2010 ACR at 1–2.1 It
also suggests that new issues have
arisen, citing its uncertainty over
Commission interpretation of the cost
coverage provision (for products at less
than full coverage) and the related
question of Commission options for
addressing shortfalls. Id. at 7–10.
II. Overview of the Postal Service’s FY
2010 ACR Filing
Contents of the filing. The Postal
Service’s FY 2010 ACR filing consists of
a 77-page narrative; extensive additional
material appended as separate folders
and identified in Attachment One; and
an application for non-public treatment
of certain materials, along with a
supporting rationale filed as Attachment
Two. The filing also includes the
Comprehensive Statement, Report to the
Secretary of the Treasury, and
information on the Competitive
Products Fund filed in response to
Commission rules. This material has
been filed electronically with the
1 United States Postal Service FY 2010 Annual
Compliance Report, December 29, 2010 (FY 2010
ACR). Public portions of the Postal Service’s filing
are available at the Commission’s Web site,
https://www.prc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1471
Commission, and some also has been
filed in hard-copy form.
Scope of filing. The material
appended to the narrative consists of:
(1) Domestic product costing material
filed on an annual basis, summarized in
the CRA; (2) comparable international
costing material, summarized in the
International Cost and Revenue
Analysis (ICRA); (3) worksharing-related
cost studies; and (4) billing determinant
information for both domestic and
international mail. Id. at 2. Inclusion of
these four data sets is consistent with
the Postal Service’s past ACR filing
practices. Consistent with its FY 2009
ACR filing, the Postal Service has split
certain materials into public and nonpublic versions. Id. at 3.
‘‘Roadmap’’ document. A roadmap to
the FY 2010 ACR filing appears in the
form of USPS–FY10–9. This document
provides brief descriptions of the
materials submitted, as well as the flow
of inputs and outputs among them; a
discussion of differences in
methodology relative to Commission
methodologies in last year’s ACD; a list
of special studies; and, as required by
Commission rule 3050.2, a discussion of
obsolescence. Id. at 4.
Methodology. The Postal Service says
the scope of new methodologies has
been minimized because it has placed
heavy reliance on replicating the
methodologies used most recently by
the Commission. However, it observes
that postal operations and data
collection are not entirely static, so
there are some minor changes. These are
identified and discussed in a separate
section of the roadmap document and in
the prefaces to each of the appended
materials. Id. at 4–5.
Proposals the Postal Service has filed
to change analytical principles since the
filing of the FY 2009 ACR are identified
and summarized in a table. Id. at 5–6.
Generally, proposed changes that were
pending resolution as of the date of the
filing have been incorporated into this
ACR. Id. at 6.
Market dominant products. The
Postal Service notes that certain
transitional issues that were present in
previous ACR filings no longer pertain,
but maintains that a significant question
about the requirements of title 39 with
respect to cost coverage shortfalls has
arisen. It notes that the Commission
characterized cost coverage shortfalls as
so pervasive as to be a systemic problem
in the FY 2009 ACD, and directed the
Postal Service to develop and present a
plan to address the problem. Id. at 7.
The Postal Service says it presented its
plan in its exigency request, but no
longer considers that plan workable,
given the Commission’s disposition of
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1472
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 6 / Monday, January 10, 2011 / Notices
the exigency request. Id. at 7–8. It says
results in its current ACR filing show
that the cost coverage problem
continues to exist and remains systemic.
Id. at 8. It also says that even if it
achieves its most optimistic efficiency
enhancements, it does not foresee that
such enhancements, combined with
annual rate increases within the
statutory price cap, will result in
Periodicals, Standard Mail Flats, and
Standard Mail NFMs/Parcels reaching
full attributable cost coverage. Id.
Product-by-product costs, revenues,
and volumes. With limited exceptions,
cost, revenues, and volumes for all
market dominant products of general
applicability are shown directly in the
FY 2010 CRA or ICRA. The exceptions
are International Reply Coupon Service,
International Business Reply Mail
Service, and Negotiated Service
Agreements. Id. at 10.
Service performance. The Postal
Service notes that the Commission
issued rules on periodic reporting of
service performance measurement and
customer satisfaction in FY 2010.
Responsive information appears in
USPS–FY10–29. Id. at 11–12. The Postal
Service says it set aggressive on-time
targets of 90 percent or above for all
market dominant products and, overall,
has been successful in continuously
improving these scores. It asserts that its
targets have already been met or
exceeded for some products and in
some districts, but says there are several
instances where target scores have not
yet been met at the national level.
Specific reasons for these results are
discussed in USPS–FY10–29. Id. at 12.
Customer satisfaction. The FY 2010
ACR discusses the Postal Service’s
transition to a new system for assessing
customer experience; describes the new
methodology and changes in reporting
categories; presents a table with survey
results; and addresses why the FY 2010
scores cannot be compared to previous
years. Id. at 12–16.
Product analysis and other
information. The FY 2010 ACR includes
a detailed analysis of each market
dominant product, including domestic
Negotiated Service Agreements entered
into during FY 2010. Id. at 16–50. It also
presents information responsive to 39
U.S.C. 3652(b) on worksharing
discounts. Id. at 50–63.
Competitive products. The Postal
Service says that transitional issues that
pertained in FY 2007 and FY 2008 with
respect to the applicable requirements
of title 39 no longer existed in FY 2009,
and none affect this filing. Id. at 63. It
generally addresses product-by-product
analysis, noting where detailed
information can be found, and discusses
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Jan 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
available FY 2010 data with reference to
the competitive product pricing
standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 63–
64.
Market tests; nonpostal services. The
Postal Service also addresses the two
market tests conducted during FY 2010
and nonpostal services. Id. at 68–72.
With respect to the latter, it notes that
the Commission rule requiring the ACR
to include information on costs,
volumes, and revenues was not adopted
until late in FY 2009. The Postal Service
was limited in what it could provide in
the FY 2009 ACR, and it says it has
attempted to improve its reporting in
this ACR, but it considers the
information it is providing as generally
comparable to what it previously
provided. Id. at 70–71.
III. Procedural Steps
Statutory requirements. Section 3653
of title 39 requires the Commission to
provide interested persons with an
opportunity to comment on the ACR
and to appoint a Public Representative
to represent the interests of the general
public. The Commission hereby solicits
public comment on the Postal Service’s
FY 2010 ACR and on whether any rates
or fees in effect during FY 2010 (for
products individually or collectively)
were not in compliance with applicable
provisions of chapter 36 of title 39 (or
regulations promulgated thereunder).
Commenters addressing market
dominant products are referred in
particular to the applicable
requirements (39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and (e)
and 3626); objectives (39 U.S.C.
3622(b)); and factors (39 U.S.C. 3622(c)).
Commenters addressing competitive
products are referred to in 39 U.S.C.
3633.
The Commission also invites public
comment on the cost coverage matters
the Postal Service addresses in its filing;
service performance results; levels of
customer satisfaction achieved; progress
toward goals established in the annual
Comprehensive Report; and such other
matters that may be relevant to the
Commission’s review. Comments on
these topics will, inter alia, assist the
Commission in developing appropriate
recommendations to the Postal Service
related to the protection or promotion of
the public policy objectives of title 39.
Access to filing. The Commission has
posted the publicly available portions of
the FY 2010 ACR filing on its Web site
(https://www.prc.doc).
Comment deadlines. Comments by
interested persons are due on or before
February 2, 2011. Reply comments are
due on or before February 17, 2011. The
Commission, upon completion of its
review of the FY 2010 ACR, public
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments, and other data and
information submitted in this
proceeding, will issue its ACD. Those
needing assistance filing electronically
may contact the Docket Section
supervisor at 202–789–6846 or via email at PRC-DOCKETS@prc.gov.
Inquiries about access to non-public
materials should also be directed to the
Docket Section.
Public representative. The
Commission appoints Emmett Rand
Costich as the public representative in
this proceeding. Kenneth R. Moeller and
Diane K. Monaco, of the Commission’s
Office of Accountability and
Compliance, will provide technical
assistance.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. ACR2010 to consider matters raised
by the United States Postal Service’s FY
2010 Annual Compliance Report.
2. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Emmett Rand
Costich as officer of the Commission
(Public Representative) in this
proceeding to represent the interests of
the general public.
3. Comments on the United States
Postal Service’s FY 2010 Annual
Compliance Report to the Commission,
including the Comprehensive Statement
of Postal Operations and other reports,
are due on or before February 2, 2011.
4. Reply comments are due on or
before February 17, 2011.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–157 Filed 1–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
RECOVERY ACCOUNTABILITY AND
TRANSPARENCY BOARD
Agenda and Notice Meeting of the
Recovery Independent Advisory Panel
Recovery Accountability and
Transparency Board.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009, Public Law 111–5
(Recovery Act), and the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972
(FACA), the Recovery Accountability
and Transparency Board’s (Board)
Recovery Independent Advisory Panel
(RIAP) will meet as indicated below.
Notice of this meeting is required under
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1471-1472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-157]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. ACR2010; Order No. 636]
FY 2010 Annual Compliance Report; Comment Request
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service has filed an Annual Compliance Report on
the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its
products in fiscal year 2010. Within 90 days, the Commission must
evaluate that information and issue its determination as to whether
rates were in compliance with title 39, chapter 36 and whether service
standards in effect were met. To assist in this, the Commission seeks
public comments on the Postal Service's Annual Compliance Report.
DATES: Comments are due: February 2, 2011. Reply comments are due:
February 17, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their
views electronically should contact the person identified in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2010 ACR Filing
III. Procedural Steps
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On December 29, 2010, the United States Postal Service (Postal
Service) filed with the Commission, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3652, its
Annual Compliance Report (ACR) for fiscal year 2010. Section 3652
requires submission of data and information on the costs, revenues,
rates, and quality of service associated with postal products within 90
days of the closing of each fiscal year. In conformance with other
statutory provisions and Commission rules, the ACR filing includes the
Postal Service's FY 2010 Comprehensive Statement, its FY 2010 annual
report to the Secretary of the Treasury on the Competitive Products
Fund, and certain related Competitive Products Fund material. See,
respectively, 39 U.S.C. 3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR 3060.20-
23. In line with past practice, some of the material in the FY 2010 ACR
appears in non-public annexes.
The filing triggers a statutory review process culminating in the
Commission's issuance of an Annual Compliance Determination (ACD)
assessing compliance of Postal Service products offered during FY 2010
with applicable title 39 requirements.
The instant filing marks the fourth time since passage of the
Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) of 2006 that this
reporting and oversight process has been used. This means, as the
Postal Service observes in its current filing, that many of the
transitional issues associated with earlier filings have been overtaken
by full implementation of other PAEA provisions or have diminished in
significance. However, the Postal Service notes that some transitional
issues remain, including incorporating financial results for certain
activities formerly considered ``nonpostal'' into the Cost and Revenue
Analysis (CRA) report in accordance with Commission Order No. 391. FY
2010 ACR at 1-2.\1\ It also suggests that new issues have arisen,
citing its uncertainty over Commission interpretation of the cost
coverage provision (for products at less than full coverage) and the
related question of Commission options for addressing shortfalls. Id.
at 7-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ United States Postal Service FY 2010 Annual Compliance
Report, December 29, 2010 (FY 2010 ACR). Public portions of the
Postal Service's filing are available at the Commission's Web site,
https://www.prc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2010 ACR Filing
Contents of the filing. The Postal Service's FY 2010 ACR filing
consists of a 77-page narrative; extensive additional material appended
as separate folders and identified in Attachment One; and an
application for non-public treatment of certain materials, along with a
supporting rationale filed as Attachment Two. The filing also includes
the Comprehensive Statement, Report to the Secretary of the Treasury,
and information on the Competitive Products Fund filed in response to
Commission rules. This material has been filed electronically with the
Commission, and some also has been filed in hard-copy form.
Scope of filing. The material appended to the narrative consists
of: (1) Domestic product costing material filed on an annual basis,
summarized in the CRA; (2) comparable international costing material,
summarized in the International Cost and Revenue Analysis (ICRA); (3)
worksharing-related cost studies; and (4) billing determinant
information for both domestic and international mail. Id. at 2.
Inclusion of these four data sets is consistent with the Postal
Service's past ACR filing practices. Consistent with its FY 2009 ACR
filing, the Postal Service has split certain materials into public and
non-public versions. Id. at 3.
``Roadmap'' document. A roadmap to the FY 2010 ACR filing appears
in the form of USPS-FY10-9. This document provides brief descriptions
of the materials submitted, as well as the flow of inputs and outputs
among them; a discussion of differences in methodology relative to
Commission methodologies in last year's ACD; a list of special studies;
and, as required by Commission rule 3050.2, a discussion of
obsolescence. Id. at 4.
Methodology. The Postal Service says the scope of new methodologies
has been minimized because it has placed heavy reliance on replicating
the methodologies used most recently by the Commission. However, it
observes that postal operations and data collection are not entirely
static, so there are some minor changes. These are identified and
discussed in a separate section of the roadmap document and in the
prefaces to each of the appended materials. Id. at 4-5.
Proposals the Postal Service has filed to change analytical
principles since the filing of the FY 2009 ACR are identified and
summarized in a table. Id. at 5-6. Generally, proposed changes that
were pending resolution as of the date of the filing have been
incorporated into this ACR. Id. at 6.
Market dominant products. The Postal Service notes that certain
transitional issues that were present in previous ACR filings no longer
pertain, but maintains that a significant question about the
requirements of title 39 with respect to cost coverage shortfalls has
arisen. It notes that the Commission characterized cost coverage
shortfalls as so pervasive as to be a systemic problem in the FY 2009
ACD, and directed the Postal Service to develop and present a plan to
address the problem. Id. at 7. The Postal Service says it presented its
plan in its exigency request, but no longer considers that plan
workable, given the Commission's disposition of
[[Page 1472]]
the exigency request. Id. at 7-8. It says results in its current ACR
filing show that the cost coverage problem continues to exist and
remains systemic. Id. at 8. It also says that even if it achieves its
most optimistic efficiency enhancements, it does not foresee that such
enhancements, combined with annual rate increases within the statutory
price cap, will result in Periodicals, Standard Mail Flats, and
Standard Mail NFMs/Parcels reaching full attributable cost coverage.
Id.
Product-by-product costs, revenues, and volumes. With limited
exceptions, cost, revenues, and volumes for all market dominant
products of general applicability are shown directly in the FY 2010 CRA
or ICRA. The exceptions are International Reply Coupon Service,
International Business Reply Mail Service, and Negotiated Service
Agreements. Id. at 10.
Service performance. The Postal Service notes that the Commission
issued rules on periodic reporting of service performance measurement
and customer satisfaction in FY 2010. Responsive information appears in
USPS-FY10-29. Id. at 11-12. The Postal Service says it set aggressive
on-time targets of 90 percent or above for all market dominant products
and, overall, has been successful in continuously improving these
scores. It asserts that its targets have already been met or exceeded
for some products and in some districts, but says there are several
instances where target scores have not yet been met at the national
level. Specific reasons for these results are discussed in USPS-FY10-
29. Id. at 12.
Customer satisfaction. The FY 2010 ACR discusses the Postal
Service's transition to a new system for assessing customer experience;
describes the new methodology and changes in reporting categories;
presents a table with survey results; and addresses why the FY 2010
scores cannot be compared to previous years. Id. at 12-16.
Product analysis and other information. The FY 2010 ACR includes a
detailed analysis of each market dominant product, including domestic
Negotiated Service Agreements entered into during FY 2010. Id. at 16-
50. It also presents information responsive to 39 U.S.C. 3652(b) on
worksharing discounts. Id. at 50-63.
Competitive products. The Postal Service says that transitional
issues that pertained in FY 2007 and FY 2008 with respect to the
applicable requirements of title 39 no longer existed in FY 2009, and
none affect this filing. Id. at 63. It generally addresses product-by-
product analysis, noting where detailed information can be found, and
discusses available FY 2010 data with reference to the competitive
product pricing standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 63-64.
Market tests; nonpostal services. The Postal Service also addresses
the two market tests conducted during FY 2010 and nonpostal services.
Id. at 68-72. With respect to the latter, it notes that the Commission
rule requiring the ACR to include information on costs, volumes, and
revenues was not adopted until late in FY 2009. The Postal Service was
limited in what it could provide in the FY 2009 ACR, and it says it has
attempted to improve its reporting in this ACR, but it considers the
information it is providing as generally comparable to what it
previously provided. Id. at 70-71.
III. Procedural Steps
Statutory requirements. Section 3653 of title 39 requires the
Commission to provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment
on the ACR and to appoint a Public Representative to represent the
interests of the general public. The Commission hereby solicits public
comment on the Postal Service's FY 2010 ACR and on whether any rates or
fees in effect during FY 2010 (for products individually or
collectively) were not in compliance with applicable provisions of
chapter 36 of title 39 (or regulations promulgated thereunder).
Commenters addressing market dominant products are referred in
particular to the applicable requirements (39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and (e)
and 3626); objectives (39 U.S.C. 3622(b)); and factors (39 U.S.C.
3622(c)). Commenters addressing competitive products are referred to in
39 U.S.C. 3633.
The Commission also invites public comment on the cost coverage
matters the Postal Service addresses in its filing; service performance
results; levels of customer satisfaction achieved; progress toward
goals established in the annual Comprehensive Report; and such other
matters that may be relevant to the Commission's review. Comments on
these topics will, inter alia, assist the Commission in developing
appropriate recommendations to the Postal Service related to the
protection or promotion of the public policy objectives of title 39.
Access to filing. The Commission has posted the publicly available
portions of the FY 2010 ACR filing on its Web site (https://www.prc.doc).
Comment deadlines. Comments by interested persons are due on or
before February 2, 2011. Reply comments are due on or before February
17, 2011. The Commission, upon completion of its review of the FY 2010
ACR, public comments, and other data and information submitted in this
proceeding, will issue its ACD. Those needing assistance filing
electronically may contact the Docket Section supervisor at 202-789-
6846 or via e-mail at PRC-DOCKETS@prc.gov. Inquiries about access to
non-public materials should also be directed to the Docket Section.
Public representative. The Commission appoints Emmett Rand Costich
as the public representative in this proceeding. Kenneth R. Moeller and
Diane K. Monaco, of the Commission's Office of Accountability and
Compliance, will provide technical assistance.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. ACR2010 to consider
matters raised by the United States Postal Service's FY 2010 Annual
Compliance Report.
2. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Emmett Rand
Costich as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) in this
proceeding to represent the interests of the general public.
3. Comments on the United States Postal Service's FY 2010 Annual
Compliance Report to the Commission, including the Comprehensive
Statement of Postal Operations and other reports, are due on or before
February 2, 2011.
4. Reply comments are due on or before February 17, 2011.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-157 Filed 1-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P