New Postal Product, 1199-1200 [2011-129]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Notices with the regulation. Due to the activation of ERO personnel as a result of the tornado two days prior to June 8, 2010 biennial exercise, the 20 training drills conducted since the last evaluated biennial EP exercise, and the licensee’s support of the FEMA evaluation of the State and local authorities during the June 8, 2010 exercise, the NRC staff considers the licensee to have made good faith efforts to comply with the regulation. Also, the requested exemption to conduct the onsite EP exercise in CY 2011 instead of CY 2010 would grant only temporary relief from the applicable regulation. Since the underlying purpose of 10 CFR part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.b is achieved, the licensee has made a good faith effort to comply with the regulation, and the exemption would grant only temporary relief from the applicable regulation, the special circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii and v) exist for the granting of an exemption. 4.0 Conclusion jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, is consistent with the common defense and security, and special circumstances are present. Therefore, the Commission, hereby grants DECo an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.b to conduct the onsite portion of the Fermi 2 biennial EP exercise required for CY 2010, permitting that part of the exercise to be conducted in coordination with NRC Region III and Fermi 2 plant schedule as soon as reasonably achievable in CY 2011. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment (75 FR 81316). This exemption is effective upon issuance. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of December 2010. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Allen. G. Howe, Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011–113 Filed 1–6–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:30 Jan 06, 2011 Jkt 223001 POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. MC2011–18 and CP2011–57; Order No. 635] New Postal Product Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service request to add Priority Mail Contract 35 to the competitive product list. This notice addresses procedural steps associated with this filing. DATES: Comments are due: January 12, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their views electronically should contact the person identified in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on alternatives to electronic filing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Notice of Filing III. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service filed a formal request and associated supporting information to add Priority Mail Contract 35 to the competitive product list.1 Priority Mail contracts enable the Postal Service to provide Priority Mail service to an individual customer at customized rates.2 The Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Contract 35 is a competitive product ‘‘not of general applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2011–18. The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract related to the proposed new product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 1 Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 35 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Contract and Supporting Data, December 30, 2010 (Request). 2 Decision of the Governors of the United States Postal Service on Establishment of Rates and Classes Not of General Applicability for Priority Mail Contract Group, Docket No. MC2009–25, issued April 27, 2009, at 1 (Governors’ Decision No. 09–6). PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1199 39 CFR 3015.5. Id., Attachment B. The instant contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2011–57. Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six attachments as follows: • Attachment A—a redacted copy of Governors’ Decision No. 09–6, authorizing certain Priority Mail contracts, and a certification of the Governors’ vote; • Attachment B—a redacted copy of the contract; • Attachment C—proposed changes to the Mail Classification Schedule competitive product list that would add Priority Mail Contract 35 under Domestic Negotiated Service Agreements; • Attachment D—a Statement of Supporting Justification as required by 39 CFR 3020.32; • Attachment E—a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and • Attachment F—an application for non-public treatment of materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial information under seal. In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Josen Punnoose, Manager, Shipping Support (A), Shipping Services, asserts that the service to be provided under the contract will cover its attributable costs, make a positive contribution to covering institutional costs, and increase contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service’s total institutional costs. Id., Attachment D at 1. Mr. Punnoose contends that there will be no issue of market dominant products subsidizing competitive products as a result of this contract. Id. Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of the related contract with the Request. Id., Attachment B. The contract is scheduled to become effective 1 business day after the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approvals. Id. at 2. The contract will expire 3 years from the effective date unless, among other things, either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days’ written notice to the other party. Id. at 2–3. The Postal Service represents that the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id., Attachment D. The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials, including the related contract, under seal. Id., Attachment F. It maintains that redacted portions of the contract, customeridentifying information, and related financial information should remain confidential. Id. at 2–3. This information includes the price structure, E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1 1200 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Notices underlying costs and assumptions, pricing formulas, information relevant to the customer’s mailing profile, and cost coverage projections. Id. The Postal Service asks the Commission to protect customer-identifying information from public disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7. II. Notice of Filings The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2011–18 and CP2011–57 to consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 35 product and the related contract, respectively. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal Service’s filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than January 12, 2011. The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.prc.gov). The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public Representative in these dockets. III. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2011–18 and CP2011–57 to consider the matters raised in each docket. 2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings. 3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no later than January 12, 2011. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2011–129 Filed 1–6–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. MC2011–17 and CP2011–56; Order No. 634] jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES New Postal Product Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service request to add Priority Mail Contract 34 to the competitive product list. This notice SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:30 Jan 06, 2011 Jkt 223001 addresses procedural steps associated with this filing. DATES: Comments are due: January 12, 2011. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their views electronically should contact the person identified in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on alternatives to electronic filing. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Notice of Filing III. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service filed a formal request and associated supporting information to add Priority Mail Contract 34 to the competitive product list.1 Priority Mail contracts enable the Postal Service to provide Priority Mail service to an individual customer at customized rates.2 The Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Contract 34 is a competitive product ‘‘not of general applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2011–17. The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract related to the proposed new product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5. Id., Attachment B. The instant contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2011–56. Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six attachments as follows: • Attachment A—a redacted copy of Governors’ Decision No. 09–6, authorizing certain Priority Mail contracts, and a certification of the Governors’ vote; • Attachment B—a redacted copy of the contract; • Attachment C—proposed changes to the Mail Classification Schedule 1 Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 34 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Contract and Supporting Data, December 30, 2010 (Request). 2 Decision of the Governors of the United States Postal Service on Establishment of Rates and Classes Not of General Applicability for Priority Mail Contract Group, April 27, 2009, at 1 (Governors’ Decision No. 09–6). PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 competitive product list that would add Priority Mail Contract 34 under Domestic Negotiated Service Agreements; • Attachment D—a Statement of Supporting Justification as required by 39 CFR 3020.32; • Attachment E—a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and • Attachment F—an application for non-public treatment of materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial information under seal. In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Josen Punnoose, Manager, Shipping Support (A), Shipping Services, asserts that the service to be provided under the contract will cover its attributable costs, make a positive contribution to covering institutional costs, and increase contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service’s total institutional costs. Id., Attachment D at 1. Mr. Punnoose contends there will be no issue of market dominant products subsidizing competitive products as a result of this contract. Id. Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of the related contract with the Request. Id., Attachment B. The contract is scheduled to become effective 1 business day after the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approvals. Id., at 2. The contract will expire 3 years from the effective date unless, among other things, either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days’ written notice to the other party. Id. at 3. The Postal Service represents that the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id., Attachment D. The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials, including the related contract, under seal. Id. Attachment F. It maintains that the redacted portions of the contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial information should remain confidential. Id. at 2–3. This information includes the price structure, underlying costs and assumptions, pricing formulas, information relevant to the customer’s mailing profile, and cost coverage projections. Id. The Postal Service asks the Commission to protect customer-identifying information from public disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7. II. Notice of Filings The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2011–17 and CP2011–56 to consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 34 product and the related contract, respectively. E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1199-1200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-129]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. MC2011-18 and CP2011-57; Order No. 635]


New Postal Product

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service 
request to add Priority Mail Contract 35 to the competitive product 
list. This notice addresses procedural steps associated with this 
filing.

DATES: Comments are due: January 12, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing 
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot submit their 
views electronically should contact the person identified in FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by telephone for advice on alternatives to 
electronic filing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

    In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the 
Postal Service filed a formal request and associated supporting 
information to add Priority Mail Contract 35 to the competitive product 
list.\1\ Priority Mail contracts enable the Postal Service to provide 
Priority Mail service to an individual customer at customized rates.\2\ 
The Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Contract 35 is a 
competitive product ``not of general applicability'' within the meaning 
of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The Request has been assigned 
Docket No. MC2011-18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority 
Mail Contract 35 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing 
(Under Seal) of Contract and Supporting Data, December 30, 2010 
(Request).
    \2\ Decision of the Governors of the United States Postal 
Service on Establishment of Rates and Classes Not of General 
Applicability for Priority Mail Contract Group, Docket No. MC2009-
25, issued April 27, 2009, at 1 (Governors' Decision No. 09-6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract 
related to the proposed new product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 
CFR 3015.5. Id., Attachment B. The instant contract has been assigned 
Docket No. CP2011-57.
    Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six 
attachments as follows:
     Attachment A--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No. 
09-6, authorizing certain Priority Mail contracts, and a certification 
of the Governors' vote;
     Attachment B--a redacted copy of the contract;
     Attachment C--proposed changes to the Mail Classification 
Schedule competitive product list that would add Priority Mail Contract 
35 under Domestic Negotiated Service Agreements;
     Attachment D--a Statement of Supporting Justification as 
required by 39 CFR 3020.32;
     Attachment E--a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 
3633(a); and
     Attachment F--an application for non-public treatment of 
materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract, customer-
identifying information, and related financial information under seal.
    In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Josen Punnoose, 
Manager, Shipping Support (A), Shipping Services, asserts that the 
service to be provided under the contract will cover its attributable 
costs, make a positive contribution to covering institutional costs, 
and increase contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the 
Postal Service's total institutional costs. Id., Attachment D at 1. Mr. 
Punnoose contends that there will be no issue of market dominant 
products subsidizing competitive products as a result of this contract. 
Id.
    Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of 
the related contract with the Request. Id., Attachment B. The contract 
is scheduled to become effective 1 business day after the Commission 
issues all necessary regulatory approvals. Id. at 2. The contract will 
expire 3 years from the effective date unless, among other things, 
either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days' written notice to 
the other party. Id. at 2-3. The Postal Service represents that the 
contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id., Attachment D.
    The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials, 
including the related contract, under seal. Id., Attachment F. It 
maintains that redacted portions of the contract, customer-identifying 
information, and related financial information should remain 
confidential. Id. at 2-3. This information includes the price 
structure,

[[Page 1200]]

underlying costs and assumptions, pricing formulas, information 
relevant to the customer's mailing profile, and cost coverage 
projections. Id. The Postal Service asks the Commission to protect 
customer-identifying information from public disclosure indefinitely. 
Id. at 7.

II. Notice of Filings

    The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2011-18 and CP2011-57 to 
consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 
35 product and the related contract, respectively.
    Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal 
Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the 
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 CFR 
part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than January 12, 2011. 
The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the 
Commission's Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
    The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public 
Representative in these dockets.

III. Ordering Paragraphs

    It is ordered:
    1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2011-18 and CP2011-57 
to consider the matters raised in each docket.
    2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to 
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent 
the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
    3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no 
later than January 12, 2011.
    4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the 
Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-129 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P