Pay Under the General Schedule and Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention Incentives, 1096-1100 [2011-111]
Download as PDF
1096
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 5
Friday, January 7, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
agency may consider before approving a
retention incentive; provide that OPM
may require data on recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentives
from agencies on an annual basis; and
make additional minor clarifications
and corrections.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Administration and Oversight of
Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention
Incentives
5 CFR Parts 531 and 575
RIN 3206–AM13
Pay Under the General Schedule and
Recruitment, Relocation, and
Retention Incentives
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing proposed
regulations to improve oversight of
group recruitment incentive
determinations and all retention
incentives; add succession planning to
the list of factors that an agency may
consider before approving a retention
incentive; provide that OPM may
require data on recruitment, relocation,
and retention incentives from agencies
on an annual basis; and make additional
minor clarifications and corrections.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 8, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number ‘‘3206–
AM13,’’ using either of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jerome D. Mikowicz, Deputy
Associate Director, Pay and Leave,
Employee Services, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31,
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20415–8200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carey Jones by telephone at (202) 606–
2858; by fax at (202) 606–0824; or by
e-mail at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
is issuing proposed regulations to
improve oversight of group recruitment
incentive determinations and all
retention incentives; add succession
planning to the list of factors that an
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Jan 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
In May 2009, OPM announced a
project to review and improve the
administration and oversight of
recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentives (3Rs). In a memorandum to
heads of executive departments and
agencies, OPM asked agencies to review
their 3Rs programs to ensure that
ongoing and new authorizations for
payments to employees are used only
when necessary to support the agency’s
mission and recommended agencies
review all retention incentives at least
annually. In July 2009, OPM asked each
agency to review and, if needed, update
its 3Rs plans, as well as approval and
internal monitoring procedures to
ensure they meet the requirements in 5
CFR part 575, subparts A, B, and C. In
August 2009, OPM convened a work
group of compensation experts from the
12 Federal agencies that used the
greatest number of 3Rs in 2007 to
develop recommendations for
improving the administration and
oversight of the 3Rs authorities. The
work group recommended that OPM
issue proposed regulations to require
agencies to review group recruitment
incentives and all retention incentives
at least annually to determine whether
they should be modified or
discontinued based on new or changed
conditions. This will help agencies
ensure that recurring recruitment or
retention incentive authorizations for
the same group of employees (or
individual employees, in the case of
retention incentives) are appropriate.
These proposed regulations support the
recommendations made by OPM in the
May 2009 memo and by the work group.
Recruitment Incentives
Under 5 CFR 575.105, an agency may
target groups of similar positions that
have been difficult to fill in the past or
that are likely to be difficult to fill in the
future and may make the determination
to offer a recruitment incentive to
newly-appointed employees on a group
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
basis. OPM proposes revising 5 CFR
575.105(b) to require that each agency
review each decision to target a group
of similar positions at least annually to
determine whether the positions are still
likely to be difficult to fill. An
authorized agency official must certify
this determination in writing. An
agency that determines a group of
similar positions is no longer likely to
be difficult to fill may no longer offer a
group recruitment incentive to newlyappointed employees of that group.
Relocation Incentives
As provided in 5 U.S.C.
5753(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II), an agency may pay
a relocation incentive only if the
employee must relocate to accept a
position in a different geographic area.
In order to make this determination, the
regulations in 5 CFR 575.205(b) require
that an employee establish a residence
in the new geographic area before the
agency may pay a relocation incentive
to the employee. OPM proposes revising
5 CFR 575.205(b) by adding a
requirement that an employee maintain
residency in the new geographic area for
the duration of the service agreement in
order to receive relocation incentive
payments. OPM also proposes revising 5
CFR 575.211(b) to require that an
authorized agency official terminate a
relocation incentive service agreement if
an employee fails to maintain residency
in the new geographic area for the
duration of the service agreement. These
changes will make the regulations more
consistent with the requirement in the
law that an employee must relocate to
receive a relocation incentive.
Retention Incentives
Annual Review
OPM’s regulations in 5 CFR 575.311
are clear that each agency is responsible
for terminating retention incentives
when conditions change such that the
original determination to pay the
incentive no longer applies or when
payment is no longer warranted.
Agencies are currently required under
§ 575.311(f) to review each
determination to pay a retention
incentive without a service agreement at
least annually to determine whether the
payment is still warranted. OPM
proposes revising § 575.311(a) to require
that agencies also review each
determination to pay a retention
incentive that is subject to a service
E:\FR\FM\07JAP1.SGM
07JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
agreement at least annually to determine
whether the original determination to
pay the retention incentive still applies
or whether payment is still warranted
and certify this determination in
writing. This will ensure all retention
incentive authorizations are reviewed at
least annually, whether associated with
a service agreement or not.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Succession Planning
An agency must consider the factors
in 5 CFR 575.306(b), as applicable to the
case at hand, in determining whether
the unusually high or unique
qualifications of an employee or a
special need of the agency for an
employee’s services makes it essential to
retain the employee and that the
employee would be likely to leave the
Federal service in the absence of a
retention incentive. OPM proposes
adding another factor for agencies to
consider as follows: ‘‘The quality and
availability of the potential sources of
employees that are identified in the
agency’s succession plan, who possess
the competencies required for the
position, and who, with minimal
training, cost, and disruption of service
to the public, could perform the full
range of duties and responsibilities of
the employee’s position at the level
performed by the employee.’’
Succession planning is a critical
success factor in strategic workforce
analysis, planning, and decision
making. OPM currently requires each
agency to establish a succession plan to
fill supervisory and managerial
positions. (See 5 CFR 412.201 and
250.202(c)(2).) In addition, OPM’s
Human Capital Assessment and
Accountability Framework advises that
a succession plan should include
specific goals and leadership positions
needed, target positions and key
leadership competencies, potential
sources of talent that best support the
agency’s mission and culture, and
recruitment or development strategies
needed to ensure availability of wellqualified staff to fill leadership
positions at all levels. Agencies
currently have the flexibility to consider
their succession planning efforts in the
decision process for awarding retention
incentives as ‘‘other supporting factors’’
under 5 CFR 575.306(b)(8). However,
specifically listing the factor in this
section of the regulations will
strengthen the relationship between
succession planning and retention
incentives.
OPM is also taking this opportunity to
correct some erroneous references in
§ 575.305(c).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Jan 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
Employee Eligibility
Currently, Senior Executive Service
(SES) members paid under 5 U.S.C.
5383 are eligible for recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentives
under 5 CFR 575.103(a)(3),
575.203(a)(3), and 575.303(a)(3), unless
the SES member is excluded under one
of the conditions in 5 CFR 575.104,
575.204, and 575.304. Some of the
exclusions are established under 5
U.S.C. 5753(a)(2) and 5754(a)(2), while
the others are established under
regulatory authority consistent with the
intent of the law. All of the exclusions
in the law and regulations are political
appointees or individuals whose
political appointments are pending. For
example, an agency may not pay a
recruitment, relocation, or retention
incentive to an employee in a position
to which the individual is appointed by
the President with or without the advice
and consent of the Senate.
An agency made OPM aware of an
extremely rare situation in which an
individual was appointed by the
President, without the advice and
consent of the Senate, to a position in
the career SES. The agency had properly
determined that the position is a career
reserved position as that term is defined
in 5 U.S.C. 3132. Such an employee
should be eligible for a recruitment,
relocation, or retention incentive
because the employee serves as a career
appointee while in the Presidential
appointment. A career SES member who
accepts a Presidential appointment and
no longer serves as a career appointee
under the Presidential appointment
would not be eligible for recruitment,
relocation, or retention incentives. Note
also that coverage under the 3Rs
authorities is not among the elections
available to an individual under 5 CFR
part 317, subpart H. Therefore, OPM
proposes revising 5 CFR 575.104(d)(1),
575.204(d)(1), and 575.304(d)(1) to
clarify that an agency may pay a
recruitment, relocation, or retention
incentive to an employee in an SES
position in which the individual serves
as a career appointee, even if the
member is appointed by the President
without the advice and consent of the
Senate.
OPM also proposes revising 5 CFR
575.104(d), 575.204(d), and 575.304(d)
to clarify that all individuals whose SES
limited appointments are cleared
through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel are ineligible for
3Rs payments. Limited term and limited
emergency SES appointments may be
political appointments if made to
positions that are political in character
(e.g., established for an individual
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1097
pending Presidential appointment, for
political transition purposes, or for
other political purposes of the agency or
Administration) and should be excluded
from coverage as other political
positions are excluded from coverage.
Another agency recently asked OPM
whether a limited term or limited
emergency SES member could receive a
recruitment incentive if selected for a
career SES position. Recruitment
incentives may be paid to an employee
who is ‘‘newly appointed’’ to the Federal
Government, as that term is defined in
5 CFR 575.102. The definition includes
the first appointment (regardless of
tenure) as an employee of the Federal
Government, an appointment following
a break in service of at least 90 days
from a previous appointment as an
employee of the Federal Government,
or, in certain cases, an appointment
following a break in service of less than
90 days from a previous appointment as
an employee of the Federal Government.
OPM proposes adding that a break in
service of at least 90 days would not be
required if the previous appointment
was a position to which the individual
was appointed as an SES limited term
appointee or limited emergency
appointee (except as described in the
next paragraph). This would be
consistent with how a time-limited
appointment in the competitive or
excepted service is not subject to the 90day break in service requirement.
OPM also proposes clarifying that an
employee would be required to have a
break in service of at least 90 days from
an appointment that is ineligible for
recruitment incentives as provided in 5
CFR 575.104 even if the appointment is
otherwise covered by an exception in
the definition of ‘‘newly appointed’’ in 5
CFR 575.102. For example, as proposed,
an SES limited term appointee or
limited emergency appointee when the
appointment must be cleared through
the White House Office of Presidential
Personnel would be required to have at
least a 90-day break in service before
becoming eligible for a recruitment
incentive, but an SES limited term
appointee or limited emergency
appointee when the appointment does
not need to be cleared through the
White House Office of Presidential
Personnel would not be required to have
at least a 90-day break in service before
becoming eligible for a recruitment
incentive. OPM also proposes making
similar revisions to the superior
qualifications and special needs paysetting authority regulations in 5 CFR
531.212(a)(3).
E:\FR\FM\07JAP1.SGM
07JAP1
1098
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Reports
Section 101(c) of the Federal
Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (Pub.
L. 108–411, October 30, 2004) required
OPM to submit an annual report to the
Committee on Governmental Affairs of
the Senate and the Committee on
Government Reform in the House of
Representatives on the operation of the
3Rs authorities for each of the first 5
years in which the amended authorities
were in effect (i.e., 2005 to 2009).
Sections 575.113(b), 575.213(b),
575.313(b), and 575.315(i) require
agencies to submit specific information
and data to OPM for this annual report.
While OPM will no longer be required
to submit a report to Congress on
agencies’ use of the 3Rs authorities in
calendar year 2010 and subsequent
calendar years, OPM has found the
annual report to be very informative
concerning Governmentwide use of the
3Rs. We also learned in the interagency
work group that met in August 2009 (see
Administration and Oversight of
Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention
Incentives section of this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) that the
3Rs report may help agencies
understand the nature and trends of
their own 3Rs use. OPM is also able to
compare the data agencies report to
OPM for the report to Congress to the
data agencies report to OPM’s central
data systems under 5 CFR 9.2 and
follow up with agencies concerning the
accuracy of the data. Therefore, OPM
proposes to amend sections 575.113(b),
575.213(b), 575.313(b), and 575.314(i)
(as redesignated in these proposed
regulations) to remove references to
OPM’s report to Congress and provide
that OPM may require that each agency
submit a report to OPM on its use of
incentives in the previous calendar year.
The proposed regulations would also
allow OPM to exempt an agency (or part
of an agency) from all or any part of any
reporting requirement if OPM has
determined that the incentive data
submitted to OPM’s central data systems
under 5 CFR 9.2 is accurate and
sufficient for our Governmentwide role
of monitoring and administering the
3Rs.
Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention
Payments Authorized Before May 1,
2005
Under section 101(d)(2) of Public Law
108–411 and 5 CFR 575.114 and
575.214, a recruitment or relocation
bonus service agreement that was
authorized under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5
CFR part 575, subparts A and B, before
May 1, 2005, remained in effect until its
expiration, subject to the law and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Jan 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
regulations applicable to recruitment
and relocation bonuses before May 1,
2005. We propose removing §§ 575.114
and 575.214, as such recruitment and
relocation bonus service agreements
have likely expired.
Under section 101(d)(3) of Public Law
108–411 and 5 CFR 575.314, retention
allowances that were authorized under
5 U.S.C. 5754 and 5 CFR part 575,
subpart C, before May 1, 2005, had to
continue to be paid until the retention
allowance was reauthorized or
terminated, but not later than April 30,
2006, and were subject to the law and
regulations applicable to retention
allowances before May 1, 2005. We
propose removing § 575.314 and
redesignating § 575.315 as § 575.314
because the April 30, 2006 deadline has
been met.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will apply only to Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 531 and
575
Government employees, Law
enforcement officers, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to
amend 5 CFR parts 531 and 575 as
follows:
PART 531—PAY UNDER THE
GENERAL SCHEDULE
1. The authority citation for part 531
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5115, 5307, and 5338;
sec. 4 of Public Law 103–89, 107 Stat. 981;
and E.O. 12748, 56 FR 4521, 3 CFR, 1991
Comp., p. 316; Subpart B also issued under
5 U.S.C. 5303(g), 5305, 5333, 5334(a) and (b),
and 7701(b)(2); Subpart D also issued under
5 U.S.C. 5335 and 7701(b)(2); Subpart E also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5336; Subpart F also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5304 and 5305; E.O.
12883, 58 FR 63281, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
682; and E.O. 13106, 63 FR 68151, 3 CFR,
1998 Comp., p. 224.
Subpart B—Determining Rate of Basic
Pay
2. In § 531.212—
a. Amend paragraph (a)(1)(ii) by
removing word ‘‘and’’ and adding ‘‘or’’ in
its place;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
b. Revise paragraph (a)(3); and
c. Add paragraph (a)(5).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 531.212 Superior qualifications and
special needs pay-setting authority.
(a) * * *
(3) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(5) of this section, an agency may use
the superior qualifications and special
needs pay-setting authority for a
reappointment without requiring a 90day break in service if the candidate’s
civilian employment with the Federal
Government during the 90-day period
immediately preceding the appointment
was limited to one or more of the
following:
(i) A time-limited appointment in the
competitive or excepted service;
(ii) A non-permanent appointment in
the competitive or excepted service;
(iii) Employment with the government
of the District of Columbia (DC) when
the candidate was first appointed by the
DC government on or after October 1,
1987;
(iv) An appointment as an expert or
consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109 and 5
CFR part 304;
(v) Employment under a provisional
appointment designated under 5 CFR
316.403;
(vi) Employment under the Student
Career Experience Program under 5 CFR
213.3202(b); or
(vii) Employment as a Senior
Executive Service limited term
appointee or limited emergency
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) An agency may not apply an
exception in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section if the candidate’s civilian
employment with the Federal
Government during the 90-day period
immediately preceding the appointment
was in one or more of the following
types of positions—
(i) A position to which an individual
is appointed by the President, by and
with the advice and consent of the
Senate;
(ii) A position in the Senior Executive
Service as a noncareer appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(7));
(iii) A position excepted from the
competitive service by reason of its
confidential, policy-determining,
policy-making, or policy-advocating
character;
(iv) A position to which an individual
is appointed by the President without
the advice and consent of the Senate;
(v) A position designated as the head
of an agency, including an agency
headed by a collegial body composed of
two or more individual members;
E:\FR\FM\07JAP1.SGM
07JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(vi) A position in which the employee
is expected to receive an appointment as
the head of an agency; or
(vii) A position to which an
individual is appointed as a Senior
Executive Service limited term
appointee or limited emergency
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively) when
the appointment must be cleared
through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 575—RECRUITMENT,
RELOCATION, AND RETENTION
INCENTIVES; SUPERVISORY
DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED
ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES
3. Revise the authority citation for
part 575 to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) and 5307;
subparts A and B also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5753; subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5754; subpart D also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5755; subpart E also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5757 and sec. 207 of Public Law 107–273,
116 Stat. 1780.
Subpart A—Recruitment Incentives
4. In § 575.102, revise paragraph (3) in
the definition of newly appointed to
read as follows:
§ 575.102
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
Newly appointed refers to—* * *
(3) An appointment of an individual
in the Federal Government when his or
her service in the Federal Government
during the 90-day period immediately
preceding the appointment was not in a
position excluded by section 575.104
and was limited to one or more of the
following:
(i) A time-limited appointment in the
competitive or excepted service;
(ii) A non-permanent appointment in
the competitive or excepted service;
(iii) Employment with the government
of the District of Columbia (DC) when
the candidate was first appointed by the
DC government on or after October 1,
1987;
(iv) An appointment as an expert or
consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109 and 5
CFR part 304;
(v) Employment under a provisional
appointment designated under 5 CFR
316.403;
(vi) Employment under the Student
Career Experience Program under 5 CFR
213.3202(b); or
(vii) Employment as a Senior
Executive Service limited term
appointee or limited emergency
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively).
*
*
*
*
*
15:28 Jan 06, 2011
§ 575.104 Ineligible categories of
employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) To which an individual is
appointed by the President without the
advice and consent of the Senate, except
a Senior Executive Service position in
which the individual serves as a career
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(4));
*
*
*
*
*
(4) To which an individual is
appointed as a Senior Executive Service
limited term appointee or limited
emergency appointee (as defined in 5
U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6),
respectively) when the appointment
must be cleared through the White
House Office of Presidential Personnel.
6. In § 575.105, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 575.105
Definitions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
5. In § 575.104—
a. Revise paragraph (d)(1);
b. Remove ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph
(d)(2);
c. Remove the period at the end of
paragraph (d)(3) and add ‘‘; or’’ in its
place; and
d. Add paragraph (d)(4).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
Jkt 223001
Applicability to employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) An agency may target groups of
similar positions (excluding positions
covered by § 575.103(a)(2), (a)(3), or
(a)(5) or those in similar categories
approved by OPM under § 575.103(a)(7))
that have been difficult to fill in the past
or that may be difficult to fill in the
future and make the required
determination to offer a recruitment
incentive to newly-appointed
employees on a group basis.
(2) An agency must review each
decision to target a group of similar
positions for the purpose of granting a
recruitment incentive at least annually
to determine whether the positions are
still likely to be difficult to fill. An
authorized agency official must certify
this determination in writing. If an
agency determines the positions are no
longer likely to be difficult to fill, the
agency may not offer a recruitment
incentive to newly-appointed
employees in that group on a group
basis.
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 575.113, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 575.113
Records and reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) OPM may require that each agency
submit an annual written report to OPM
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1099
on the use of the recruitment incentive
authority within the agency during the
previous calendar year. OPM may
exempt an agency (or part of an agency)
from all or any part of any reporting
requirement established under this
section if OPM has determined that the
recruitment incentive data submitted to
OPM’s central data systems under 5 CFR
9.2 is accurate and sufficient. Each
agency report that is required must
include—
*
*
*
*
*
§ 575.114
[Removed]
8. Remove § 575.114.
Subpart B—Relocation Incentives
9. In § 575.204—
a. Revise paragraph (d)(1);
b. Remove ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph
(d)(2);
c. Remove the period at the end of
paragraph (d)(3) and add ‘‘; or’’ in its
place; and
d. Add paragraph (d)(4).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 575.204 Ineligible categories of
employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) To which an individual is
appointed by the President without the
advice and consent of the Senate, except
a Senior Executive Service position in
which the individual serves as a career
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(4));
*
*
*
*
*
(4) To which an individual is
appointed as a Senior Executive Service
limited term appointee or limited
emergency appointee (as defined in 5
U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6),
respectively) when the appointment
must be cleared through the White
House Office of Presidential Personnel.
10. In § 575.205, add a sentence at the
end of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 575.205
Applicability to employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * A relocation incentive may
be paid only if the employee maintains
residency in the new geographic area for
the duration of the service agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
11. In § 575.211, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows—
§ 575.211 Termination of a service
agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) An authorized agency official must
terminate a relocation incentive service
agreement if an employee is demoted or
separated for cause (i.e., for
E:\FR\FM\07JAP1.SGM
07JAP1
1100
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules
unacceptable performance or conduct),
if the employee receives a rating of
record (or an official performance
appraisal or evaluation under a system
not covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5
CFR part 430) of less than ‘‘Fully
Successful’’ or equivalent, if the
employee fails to maintain residency in
the new geographic area for the duration
of the service agreement, or if the
employee otherwise fails to fulfill the
terms of the service agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 575.213, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 575.213
Records and reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) OPM may require that each agency
submit an annual written report to OPM
on the use of the relocation incentive
authority within the agency during the
previous calendar year. OPM may
exempt an agency (or part of an agency)
from all or any part of any reporting
requirement established under this
section if OPM has determined that the
relocation incentive data submitted to
OPM’s central data systems under 5 CFR
9.2 is accurate and sufficient. Each
agency report that is required must
include—
*
*
*
*
*
§ 575.214
[Removed]
13. Remove § 575.214.
Subpart C—Retention Incentives
14. In § 575.304—
a. Revise paragraph (d)(1);
b. Remove ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph
(d)(2);
c. Remove the period at the end of
paragraph (d)(3) and add ‘‘; or’’ in its
place; and
d. Add paragraph (d)(4).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 575.304 Ineligible categories of
employees.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) To which an individual is
appointed by the President without the
advice and consent of the Senate, except
a Senior Executive Service position in
which the individual serves as a career
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(4));
*
*
*
*
*
(4) To which an individual is
appointed as a Senior Executive Service
limited term appointee or limited
emergency appointee (as defined in 5
U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6),
respectively) when the appointment
must be cleared through the White
House Office of Presidential Personnel.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:28 Jan 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
15. In § 575.305, revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 575.305
Applicability to employees.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An agency may not include in a
group retention incentive authorization
an employee covered by § 575.303(a)(2),
(a)(3), or (a)(5) or those in similar
categories of positions approved by
OPM to receive retention incentives
under § 575.303(a)(7).
*
*
*
*
*
16. In § 575.306, redesignate
paragraphs (b)(2) through (8) as
paragraphs (b)(3) through (9),
respectively, and add a new paragraph
(b)(2) to read as follows:
§ 575.306 Authorizing a retention
incentive.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) The quality and availability of the
potential sources of employees that are
identified in the agency’s succession
plan, who possess the competencies
required for the position, and who, with
minimal training, cost, and disruption
of service to the public, could perform
the full range of duties and
responsibilities of the employee’s
position at the level performed by the
employee;
*
*
*
*
*
17. In § 575.311, redesignate
paragraphs (a)(1) and ((2) as paragraphs
(a)(2) and (3), respectively, and add a
new paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 575.311 Continuation, reduction, and
termination of retention incentives.
(a)(1) For each retention incentive that
is subject to a service agreement, an
authorized agency official must review
the determination to pay a retention
incentive at least annually to determine
whether the original determination still
applies or whether payment is still
warranted as provided in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, and must certify
this determination in writing.
*
*
*
*
*
18. In § 575.313, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 575.313
Records and reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) OPM may require that each agency
submit an annual written report to OPM
on the use of the retention incentive
authority within the agency during the
previous calendar year. OPM may
exempt an agency (or part of an agency)
from all or any part of any reporting
requirement established under this
section if OPM has determined that the
retention incentive data submitted to
OPM’s central data systems under 5 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9.2 is accurate and sufficient. Each
agency report that is required must
include—
*
*
*
*
*
§ 575.314
[Removed]
19. Remove § 575.314.
§ 575.315
[Redesignated as § 575.314]
20. Redesignate § 575.315 as
§ 575.314.
§ 575.314
[Amended]
21. In newly redesignated § 575.314:
a. Redesignate paragraph (i)(1) as
paragraph (i) introductory text;
b. Remove paragraph (i)(2); and
c. Redesignate paragraphs (i)(1)(i)
through (i)(1)(v) as paragraphs (i)(1)
through (i)(5),
[FR Doc. 2011–111 Filed 1–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 40
[NRC–2011–0003]
RIN 3150–AH15
Implementation Guidance for
Distribution of Source Material to
Exempt Persons and to General
Licensees and Revision of General
License and Exemptions; Draft
Guidance Document for Comment
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
guidance for public comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is proposing to
amend its regulations to require that the
initial distribution of source material to
exempt persons or general licensees be
explicitly authorized by a specific
license. The proposed rule would also
modify the existing possession and use
requirements of the general license for
small quantities of source material and
revise, clarify, or delete certain source
material exemptions from licensing. The
NRC has prepared draft guidance to
address implementation of the proposed
regulations. This notice is announcing
the availability of the draft
implementation guidance document for
public comment.
DATES: Submit comments by March 8,
2011. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the NRC is able to assure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please include Docket ID
NRC–2011–0003 in the subject line of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07JAP1.SGM
07JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1096-1100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-111]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 5 / Friday, January 7, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 1096]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 531 and 575
RIN 3206-AM13
Pay Under the General Schedule and Recruitment, Relocation, and
Retention Incentives
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing
proposed regulations to improve oversight of group recruitment
incentive determinations and all retention incentives; add succession
planning to the list of factors that an agency may consider before
approving a retention incentive; provide that OPM may require data on
recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives from agencies on an
annual basis; and make additional minor clarifications and corrections.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 8, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN number ``3206-
AM13,'' using either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jerome D. Mikowicz, Deputy Associate Director, Pay and Leave,
Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900
E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carey Jones by telephone at (202) 606-
2858; by fax at (202) 606-0824; or by e-mail at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) is issuing proposed regulations to improve oversight of group
recruitment incentive determinations and all retention incentives; add
succession planning to the list of factors that an agency may consider
before approving a retention incentive; provide that OPM may require
data on recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives from agencies
on an annual basis; and make additional minor clarifications and
corrections.
Administration and Oversight of Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention
Incentives
In May 2009, OPM announced a project to review and improve the
administration and oversight of recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentives (3Rs). In a memorandum to heads of executive departments and
agencies, OPM asked agencies to review their 3Rs programs to ensure
that ongoing and new authorizations for payments to employees are used
only when necessary to support the agency's mission and recommended
agencies review all retention incentives at least annually. In July
2009, OPM asked each agency to review and, if needed, update its 3Rs
plans, as well as approval and internal monitoring procedures to ensure
they meet the requirements in 5 CFR part 575, subparts A, B, and C. In
August 2009, OPM convened a work group of compensation experts from the
12 Federal agencies that used the greatest number of 3Rs in 2007 to
develop recommendations for improving the administration and oversight
of the 3Rs authorities. The work group recommended that OPM issue
proposed regulations to require agencies to review group recruitment
incentives and all retention incentives at least annually to determine
whether they should be modified or discontinued based on new or changed
conditions. This will help agencies ensure that recurring recruitment
or retention incentive authorizations for the same group of employees
(or individual employees, in the case of retention incentives) are
appropriate. These proposed regulations support the recommendations
made by OPM in the May 2009 memo and by the work group.
Recruitment Incentives
Under 5 CFR 575.105, an agency may target groups of similar
positions that have been difficult to fill in the past or that are
likely to be difficult to fill in the future and may make the
determination to offer a recruitment incentive to newly-appointed
employees on a group basis. OPM proposes revising 5 CFR 575.105(b) to
require that each agency review each decision to target a group of
similar positions at least annually to determine whether the positions
are still likely to be difficult to fill. An authorized agency official
must certify this determination in writing. An agency that determines a
group of similar positions is no longer likely to be difficult to fill
may no longer offer a group recruitment incentive to newly-appointed
employees of that group.
Relocation Incentives
As provided in 5 U.S.C. 5753(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II), an agency may pay a
relocation incentive only if the employee must relocate to accept a
position in a different geographic area. In order to make this
determination, the regulations in 5 CFR 575.205(b) require that an
employee establish a residence in the new geographic area before the
agency may pay a relocation incentive to the employee. OPM proposes
revising 5 CFR 575.205(b) by adding a requirement that an employee
maintain residency in the new geographic area for the duration of the
service agreement in order to receive relocation incentive payments.
OPM also proposes revising 5 CFR 575.211(b) to require that an
authorized agency official terminate a relocation incentive service
agreement if an employee fails to maintain residency in the new
geographic area for the duration of the service agreement. These
changes will make the regulations more consistent with the requirement
in the law that an employee must relocate to receive a relocation
incentive.
Retention Incentives
Annual Review
OPM's regulations in 5 CFR 575.311 are clear that each agency is
responsible for terminating retention incentives when conditions change
such that the original determination to pay the incentive no longer
applies or when payment is no longer warranted. Agencies are currently
required under Sec. 575.311(f) to review each determination to pay a
retention incentive without a service agreement at least annually to
determine whether the payment is still warranted. OPM proposes revising
Sec. 575.311(a) to require that agencies also review each
determination to pay a retention incentive that is subject to a service
[[Page 1097]]
agreement at least annually to determine whether the original
determination to pay the retention incentive still applies or whether
payment is still warranted and certify this determination in writing.
This will ensure all retention incentive authorizations are reviewed at
least annually, whether associated with a service agreement or not.
Succession Planning
An agency must consider the factors in 5 CFR 575.306(b), as
applicable to the case at hand, in determining whether the unusually
high or unique qualifications of an employee or a special need of the
agency for an employee's services makes it essential to retain the
employee and that the employee would be likely to leave the Federal
service in the absence of a retention incentive. OPM proposes adding
another factor for agencies to consider as follows: ``The quality and
availability of the potential sources of employees that are identified
in the agency's succession plan, who possess the competencies required
for the position, and who, with minimal training, cost, and disruption
of service to the public, could perform the full range of duties and
responsibilities of the employee's position at the level performed by
the employee.''
Succession planning is a critical success factor in strategic
workforce analysis, planning, and decision making. OPM currently
requires each agency to establish a succession plan to fill supervisory
and managerial positions. (See 5 CFR 412.201 and 250.202(c)(2).) In
addition, OPM's Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework
advises that a succession plan should include specific goals and
leadership positions needed, target positions and key leadership
competencies, potential sources of talent that best support the
agency's mission and culture, and recruitment or development strategies
needed to ensure availability of well-qualified staff to fill
leadership positions at all levels. Agencies currently have the
flexibility to consider their succession planning efforts in the
decision process for awarding retention incentives as ``other
supporting factors'' under 5 CFR 575.306(b)(8). However, specifically
listing the factor in this section of the regulations will strengthen
the relationship between succession planning and retention incentives.
OPM is also taking this opportunity to correct some erroneous
references in Sec. 575.305(c).
Employee Eligibility
Currently, Senior Executive Service (SES) members paid under 5
U.S.C. 5383 are eligible for recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentives under 5 CFR 575.103(a)(3), 575.203(a)(3), and 575.303(a)(3),
unless the SES member is excluded under one of the conditions in 5 CFR
575.104, 575.204, and 575.304. Some of the exclusions are established
under 5 U.S.C. 5753(a)(2) and 5754(a)(2), while the others are
established under regulatory authority consistent with the intent of
the law. All of the exclusions in the law and regulations are political
appointees or individuals whose political appointments are pending. For
example, an agency may not pay a recruitment, relocation, or retention
incentive to an employee in a position to which the individual is
appointed by the President with or without the advice and consent of
the Senate.
An agency made OPM aware of an extremely rare situation in which an
individual was appointed by the President, without the advice and
consent of the Senate, to a position in the career SES. The agency had
properly determined that the position is a career reserved position as
that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132. Such an employee should be
eligible for a recruitment, relocation, or retention incentive because
the employee serves as a career appointee while in the Presidential
appointment. A career SES member who accepts a Presidential appointment
and no longer serves as a career appointee under the Presidential
appointment would not be eligible for recruitment, relocation, or
retention incentives. Note also that coverage under the 3Rs authorities
is not among the elections available to an individual under 5 CFR part
317, subpart H. Therefore, OPM proposes revising 5 CFR 575.104(d)(1),
575.204(d)(1), and 575.304(d)(1) to clarify that an agency may pay a
recruitment, relocation, or retention incentive to an employee in an
SES position in which the individual serves as a career appointee, even
if the member is appointed by the President without the advice and
consent of the Senate.
OPM also proposes revising 5 CFR 575.104(d), 575.204(d), and
575.304(d) to clarify that all individuals whose SES limited
appointments are cleared through the White House Office of Presidential
Personnel are ineligible for 3Rs payments. Limited term and limited
emergency SES appointments may be political appointments if made to
positions that are political in character (e.g., established for an
individual pending Presidential appointment, for political transition
purposes, or for other political purposes of the agency or
Administration) and should be excluded from coverage as other political
positions are excluded from coverage.
Another agency recently asked OPM whether a limited term or limited
emergency SES member could receive a recruitment incentive if selected
for a career SES position. Recruitment incentives may be paid to an
employee who is ``newly appointed'' to the Federal Government, as that
term is defined in 5 CFR 575.102. The definition includes the first
appointment (regardless of tenure) as an employee of the Federal
Government, an appointment following a break in service of at least 90
days from a previous appointment as an employee of the Federal
Government, or, in certain cases, an appointment following a break in
service of less than 90 days from a previous appointment as an employee
of the Federal Government. OPM proposes adding that a break in service
of at least 90 days would not be required if the previous appointment
was a position to which the individual was appointed as an SES limited
term appointee or limited emergency appointee (except as described in
the next paragraph). This would be consistent with how a time-limited
appointment in the competitive or excepted service is not subject to
the 90-day break in service requirement.
OPM also proposes clarifying that an employee would be required to
have a break in service of at least 90 days from an appointment that is
ineligible for recruitment incentives as provided in 5 CFR 575.104 even
if the appointment is otherwise covered by an exception in the
definition of ``newly appointed'' in 5 CFR 575.102. For example, as
proposed, an SES limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee
when the appointment must be cleared through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel would be required to have at least a 90-day
break in service before becoming eligible for a recruitment incentive,
but an SES limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee when
the appointment does not need to be cleared through the White House
Office of Presidential Personnel would not be required to have at least
a 90-day break in service before becoming eligible for a recruitment
incentive. OPM also proposes making similar revisions to the superior
qualifications and special needs pay-setting authority regulations in 5
CFR 531.212(a)(3).
[[Page 1098]]
Reports
Section 101(c) of the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004
(Pub. L. 108-411, October 30, 2004) required OPM to submit an annual
report to the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the
Committee on Government Reform in the House of Representatives on the
operation of the 3Rs authorities for each of the first 5 years in which
the amended authorities were in effect (i.e., 2005 to 2009). Sections
575.113(b), 575.213(b), 575.313(b), and 575.315(i) require agencies to
submit specific information and data to OPM for this annual report.
While OPM will no longer be required to submit a report to Congress on
agencies' use of the 3Rs authorities in calendar year 2010 and
subsequent calendar years, OPM has found the annual report to be very
informative concerning Governmentwide use of the 3Rs. We also learned
in the interagency work group that met in August 2009 (see
Administration and Oversight of Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention
Incentives section of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) that the 3Rs
report may help agencies understand the nature and trends of their own
3Rs use. OPM is also able to compare the data agencies report to OPM
for the report to Congress to the data agencies report to OPM's central
data systems under 5 CFR 9.2 and follow up with agencies concerning the
accuracy of the data. Therefore, OPM proposes to amend sections
575.113(b), 575.213(b), 575.313(b), and 575.314(i) (as redesignated in
these proposed regulations) to remove references to OPM's report to
Congress and provide that OPM may require that each agency submit a
report to OPM on its use of incentives in the previous calendar year.
The proposed regulations would also allow OPM to exempt an agency (or
part of an agency) from all or any part of any reporting requirement if
OPM has determined that the incentive data submitted to OPM's central
data systems under 5 CFR 9.2 is accurate and sufficient for our
Governmentwide role of monitoring and administering the 3Rs.
Recruitment, Relocation, and Retention Payments Authorized Before May
1, 2005
Under section 101(d)(2) of Public Law 108-411 and 5 CFR 575.114 and
575.214, a recruitment or relocation bonus service agreement that was
authorized under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5 CFR part 575, subparts A and B,
before May 1, 2005, remained in effect until its expiration, subject to
the law and regulations applicable to recruitment and relocation
bonuses before May 1, 2005. We propose removing Sec. Sec. 575.114 and
575.214, as such recruitment and relocation bonus service agreements
have likely expired.
Under section 101(d)(3) of Public Law 108-411 and 5 CFR 575.314,
retention allowances that were authorized under 5 U.S.C. 5754 and 5 CFR
part 575, subpart C, before May 1, 2005, had to continue to be paid
until the retention allowance was reauthorized or terminated, but not
later than April 30, 2006, and were subject to the law and regulations
applicable to retention allowances before May 1, 2005. We propose
removing Sec. 575.314 and redesignating Sec. 575.315 as Sec. 575.314
because the April 30, 2006 deadline has been met.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
in accordance with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
will apply only to Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 531 and 575
Government employees, Law enforcement officers, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR parts 531 and 575 as
follows:
PART 531--PAY UNDER THE GENERAL SCHEDULE
1. The authority citation for part 531 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5115, 5307, and 5338; sec. 4 of Public Law
103-89, 107 Stat. 981; and E.O. 12748, 56 FR 4521, 3 CFR, 1991
Comp., p. 316; Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5303(g), 5305,
5333, 5334(a) and (b), and 7701(b)(2); Subpart D also issued under 5
U.S.C. 5335 and 7701(b)(2); Subpart E also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5336; Subpart F also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5304 and 5305; E.O.
12883, 58 FR 63281, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 682; and E.O. 13106, 63 FR
68151, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 224.
Subpart B--Determining Rate of Basic Pay
2. In Sec. 531.212--
a. Amend paragraph (a)(1)(ii) by removing word ``and'' and adding
``or'' in its place;
b. Revise paragraph (a)(3); and
c. Add paragraph (a)(5).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 531.212 Superior qualifications and special needs pay-setting
authority.
(a) * * *
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, an
agency may use the superior qualifications and special needs pay-
setting authority for a reappointment without requiring a 90-day break
in service if the candidate's civilian employment with the Federal
Government during the 90-day period immediately preceding the
appointment was limited to one or more of the following:
(i) A time-limited appointment in the competitive or excepted
service;
(ii) A non-permanent appointment in the competitive or excepted
service;
(iii) Employment with the government of the District of Columbia
(DC) when the candidate was first appointed by the DC government on or
after October 1, 1987;
(iv) An appointment as an expert or consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109
and 5 CFR part 304;
(v) Employment under a provisional appointment designated under 5
CFR 316.403;
(vi) Employment under the Student Career Experience Program under 5
CFR 213.3202(b); or
(vii) Employment as a Senior Executive Service limited term
appointee or limited emergency appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively).
* * * * *
(5) An agency may not apply an exception in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section if the candidate's civilian employment with the Federal
Government during the 90-day period immediately preceding the
appointment was in one or more of the following types of positions--
(i) A position to which an individual is appointed by the
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
(ii) A position in the Senior Executive Service as a noncareer
appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(7));
(iii) A position excepted from the competitive service by reason of
its confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-
advocating character;
(iv) A position to which an individual is appointed by the
President without the advice and consent of the Senate;
(v) A position designated as the head of an agency, including an
agency headed by a collegial body composed of two or more individual
members;
[[Page 1099]]
(vi) A position in which the employee is expected to receive an
appointment as the head of an agency; or
(vii) A position to which an individual is appointed as a Senior
Executive Service limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee
(as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively) when the
appointment must be cleared through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel.
* * * * *
PART 575--RECRUITMENT, RELOCATION, AND RETENTION INCENTIVES;
SUPERVISORY DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES
3. Revise the authority citation for part 575 to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) and 5307; subparts A and B also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5753; subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5754; subpart D also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5755; subpart E also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5757 and sec. 207 of Public Law 107-273, 116
Stat. 1780.
Subpart A--Recruitment Incentives
4. In Sec. 575.102, revise paragraph (3) in the definition of
newly appointed to read as follows:
Sec. 575.102 Definitions.
* * * * *
Newly appointed refers to--* * *
(3) An appointment of an individual in the Federal Government when
his or her service in the Federal Government during the 90-day period
immediately preceding the appointment was not in a position excluded by
section 575.104 and was limited to one or more of the following:
(i) A time-limited appointment in the competitive or excepted
service;
(ii) A non-permanent appointment in the competitive or excepted
service;
(iii) Employment with the government of the District of Columbia
(DC) when the candidate was first appointed by the DC government on or
after October 1, 1987;
(iv) An appointment as an expert or consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109
and 5 CFR part 304;
(v) Employment under a provisional appointment designated under 5
CFR 316.403;
(vi) Employment under the Student Career Experience Program under 5
CFR 213.3202(b); or
(vii) Employment as a Senior Executive Service limited term
appointee or limited emergency appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively).
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 575.104--
a. Revise paragraph (d)(1);
b. Remove ``or'' at the end of paragraph (d)(2);
c. Remove the period at the end of paragraph (d)(3) and add ``;
or'' in its place; and
d. Add paragraph (d)(4).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.104 Ineligible categories of employees.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) To which an individual is appointed by the President without
the advice and consent of the Senate, except a Senior Executive Service
position in which the individual serves as a career appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(4));
* * * * *
(4) To which an individual is appointed as a Senior Executive
Service limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively) when the
appointment must be cleared through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel.
6. In Sec. 575.105, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.105 Applicability to employees.
* * * * *
(b)(1) An agency may target groups of similar positions (excluding
positions covered by Sec. 575.103(a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(5) or those in
similar categories approved by OPM under Sec. 575.103(a)(7)) that have
been difficult to fill in the past or that may be difficult to fill in
the future and make the required determination to offer a recruitment
incentive to newly-appointed employees on a group basis.
(2) An agency must review each decision to target a group of
similar positions for the purpose of granting a recruitment incentive
at least annually to determine whether the positions are still likely
to be difficult to fill. An authorized agency official must certify
this determination in writing. If an agency determines the positions
are no longer likely to be difficult to fill, the agency may not offer
a recruitment incentive to newly-appointed employees in that group on a
group basis.
* * * * *
7. In Sec. 575.113, revise paragraph (b) introductory text to read
as follows:
Sec. 575.113 Records and reports.
* * * * *
(b) OPM may require that each agency submit an annual written
report to OPM on the use of the recruitment incentive authority within
the agency during the previous calendar year. OPM may exempt an agency
(or part of an agency) from all or any part of any reporting
requirement established under this section if OPM has determined that
the recruitment incentive data submitted to OPM's central data systems
under 5 CFR 9.2 is accurate and sufficient. Each agency report that is
required must include--
* * * * *
Sec. 575.114 [Removed]
8. Remove Sec. 575.114.
Subpart B--Relocation Incentives
9. In Sec. 575.204--
a. Revise paragraph (d)(1);
b. Remove ``or'' at the end of paragraph (d)(2);
c. Remove the period at the end of paragraph (d)(3) and add ``;
or'' in its place; and
d. Add paragraph (d)(4).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.204 Ineligible categories of employees.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) To which an individual is appointed by the President without
the advice and consent of the Senate, except a Senior Executive Service
position in which the individual serves as a career appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(4));
* * * * *
(4) To which an individual is appointed as a Senior Executive
Service limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively) when the
appointment must be cleared through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel.
10. In Sec. 575.205, add a sentence at the end of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 575.205 Applicability to employees.
* * * * *
(b) * * * A relocation incentive may be paid only if the employee
maintains residency in the new geographic area for the duration of the
service agreement.
* * * * *
11. In Sec. 575.211, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows--
Sec. 575.211 Termination of a service agreement.
* * * * *
(b) An authorized agency official must terminate a relocation
incentive service agreement if an employee is demoted or separated for
cause (i.e., for
[[Page 1100]]
unacceptable performance or conduct), if the employee receives a rating
of record (or an official performance appraisal or evaluation under a
system not covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5 CFR part 430) of less
than ``Fully Successful'' or equivalent, if the employee fails to
maintain residency in the new geographic area for the duration of the
service agreement, or if the employee otherwise fails to fulfill the
terms of the service agreement.
* * * * *
12. In Sec. 575.213, revise paragraph (b) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 575.213 Records and reports.
* * * * *
(b) OPM may require that each agency submit an annual written
report to OPM on the use of the relocation incentive authority within
the agency during the previous calendar year. OPM may exempt an agency
(or part of an agency) from all or any part of any reporting
requirement established under this section if OPM has determined that
the relocation incentive data submitted to OPM's central data systems
under 5 CFR 9.2 is accurate and sufficient. Each agency report that is
required must include--
* * * * *
Sec. 575.214 [Removed]
13. Remove Sec. 575.214.
Subpart C--Retention Incentives
14. In Sec. 575.304--
a. Revise paragraph (d)(1);
b. Remove ``or'' at the end of paragraph (d)(2);
c. Remove the period at the end of paragraph (d)(3) and add ``;
or'' in its place; and
d. Add paragraph (d)(4).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 575.304 Ineligible categories of employees.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) To which an individual is appointed by the President without
the advice and consent of the Senate, except a Senior Executive Service
position in which the individual serves as a career appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(4));
* * * * *
(4) To which an individual is appointed as a Senior Executive
Service limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee (as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively) when the
appointment must be cleared through the White House Office of
Presidential Personnel.
15. In Sec. 575.305, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.305 Applicability to employees.
* * * * *
(c) An agency may not include in a group retention incentive
authorization an employee covered by Sec. 575.303(a)(2), (a)(3), or
(a)(5) or those in similar categories of positions approved by OPM to
receive retention incentives under Sec. 575.303(a)(7).
* * * * *
16. In Sec. 575.306, redesignate paragraphs (b)(2) through (8) as
paragraphs (b)(3) through (9), respectively, and add a new paragraph
(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.306 Authorizing a retention incentive.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) The quality and availability of the potential sources of
employees that are identified in the agency's succession plan, who
possess the competencies required for the position, and who, with
minimal training, cost, and disruption of service to the public, could
perform the full range of duties and responsibilities of the employee's
position at the level performed by the employee;
* * * * *
17. In Sec. 575.311, redesignate paragraphs (a)(1) and ((2) as
paragraphs (a)(2) and (3), respectively, and add a new paragraph (a)(1)
to read as follows:
Sec. 575.311 Continuation, reduction, and termination of retention
incentives.
(a)(1) For each retention incentive that is subject to a service
agreement, an authorized agency official must review the determination
to pay a retention incentive at least annually to determine whether the
original determination still applies or whether payment is still
warranted as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and must
certify this determination in writing.
* * * * *
18. In Sec. 575.313, revise paragraph (b) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 575.313 Records and reports.
* * * * *
(b) OPM may require that each agency submit an annual written
report to OPM on the use of the retention incentive authority within
the agency during the previous calendar year. OPM may exempt an agency
(or part of an agency) from all or any part of any reporting
requirement established under this section if OPM has determined that
the retention incentive data submitted to OPM's central data systems
under 5 CFR 9.2 is accurate and sufficient. Each agency report that is
required must include--
* * * * *
Sec. 575.314 [Removed]
19. Remove Sec. 575.314.
Sec. 575.315 [Redesignated as Sec. 575.314]
20. Redesignate Sec. 575.315 as Sec. 575.314.
Sec. 575.314 [Amended]
21. In newly redesignated Sec. 575.314:
a. Redesignate paragraph (i)(1) as paragraph (i) introductory text;
b. Remove paragraph (i)(2); and
c. Redesignate paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (i)(1)(v) as paragraphs
(i)(1) through (i)(5),
[FR Doc. 2011-111 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P