Tobacco Products, Exemptions From Substantial Equivalence Requirements, 737-744 [2011-34]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Section 2(h)(1)(B) of the Act),
membership (as described in Section
5(b)(c)(2)(C) of the Act), and the finding
of products acceptable or not acceptable
for clearing. In describing such
decisions, the derivatives clearing
organization shall specifically disclose
whether:
(1) Its Board of Directors has rejected
a recommendation or superseded an
action of the Risk Management
Committee; or
(2) The Risk Management Committee
has rejected a recommendation or
superseded an action of its
subcommittee (as described in
§ 39.13(g)(5) of this part).
(C) Nothing in the foregoing shall be
construed as requiring a designated
contract market, a registered swap
execution facility, or a derivatives
clearing organization to disclose any
‘‘non-public information’’ (as § 1.3(ggg)
of this chapter defines such term),
including, without limitation, minutes
from meetings of its Board of Directors
or committees and information that it
may have received on a confidential
basis from an applicant for membership.
(2) The registered entity must ensure
that the information specified in
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) to (vii) of this
section is current, accurate, clear, and
readily accessible, for example, on its
Web site. The registered entity shall set
forth such information in a language
commonly used in the commodity
futures and swap markets and at least
one of the domestic language(s) of the
jurisdiction in which the registered
entity is located.
(e) Regulatory Program. (1) As part of
its regulatory program, each registered
derivatives clearing organization,
designated contract market, or registered
swap execution facility must establish,
maintain, and enforce written
procedures to:
(i) Identify, on an ongoing basis,
existing and potential conflicts of
interest; and
(ii) Make fair and non-biased
decisions in the event of a conflict of
interest. Such procedures shall include
rules regarding the recusal, in
applicable circumstances, of parties
involved in the making of decisions.
The Chief Compliance Officer of a
registered derivatives clearing
organization or registered swap
execution facility shall, in consultation
with the Board of Directors of the entity,
an equivalent body, or a senior officer
of the entity, resolve any such conflicts
of interest.
(f) Limitations on Use or Disclosure of
Non-Public Information. (1) Each
registered entity must establish and
maintain written policies and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
procedures on safeguarding non-public
information gained through either an
ownership interest or through the
performance of official duties (including
duties associated with self-regulatory or
regulatory purposes) by members of its
Board of Directors, members of any
committee, or officers and other
employees.
(2) Such policies and procedures shall
comport, at a minimum, with the
following principles:
(i) No individual or entity described
in paragraph (f)(1) of this section shall
use or disclose any non-public
information, absent prior written
consent from the relevant registered
entity. A registered entity shall establish
guidelines that specify the information
that must be included in the written
consent.
(ii) No individual or entity described
in paragraph (f)(1) of this section shall,
either during or after service with the
relevant registered entity:
(A) Use, directly or indirectly,
information that the registered entity
deems to be non-public information; or
(B) Disclose non-public information to
others, except:
(1) To others within the relevant
registered entity or to outside advisors
thereof, provided that such advisors are
subject to confidentiality obligations,
and that such disclosure is necessary for
the performance of official duties by the
individual or entity;
(2) If required by regulatory authority;
or
(3) If compelled to so by valid legal
process, provided that the individual or
entity notifies the relevant registered
entity.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 9,
2010, by the Commission.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
Note: The following appendices will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendices to Governance
Requirements for Derivatives Clearing
Organizations, Designated Contract
Markets, and Swap Execution
Facilities; Additional Requirements
Regarding the Mitigation of Conflicts of
Interest—Commission Voting Summary
and Statements of Commissioners
Appendix 1—Commission Voting
Summary
On this matter, Chairman Gensler and
Commissioners Dunn, Sommers, Chilton and
O’Malia voted in the affirmative; no
Commissioners voted in the negative.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
737
Appendix 2—Statement of Chairman
Gary Gensler
I support the proposed rule on further
governance and conflicts of interest
requirements for derivatives clearing
organizations (DCOs), designated contract
markets (DCMs) and swap execution facilities
(SEFs). The proposed rule complements the
conflicts of interest provisions that the
Commission proposed on October 1st by
keeping regulators up to date about the
composition of boards, board committees and
ownership, promoting transparency in
decision-making and ensuring limitations on
use or disclosure of non-public information.
The proposed rule also provides guidance to
industry and the public on appropriate
minimum governance fitness standards for
DCOs and DCMs, as well as the manner in
which market participants must be heard or
included in DCO or DCM governance
arrangements. The proposed rule would
enhance the integrity of clearing and trading
and would increase public trust in the
facilities on which such important activities
occur.
[FR Doc. 2010–31898 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 16 and 1107
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0646]
RIN 0910–AG39
Tobacco Products, Exemptions From
Substantial Equivalence Requirements
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing this
proposed rule to establish procedures
for requesting an exemption from the
substantial equivalence requirements of
the Family Smoking Prevention and
Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control
Act). The proposed rule would describe
the process and statutory criteria for
requesting an exemption and explain
how FDA would review requests for
exemptions. Once finalized, this
regulation will satisfy the requirement
in the Tobacco Control Act that FDA
issue regulations implementing the
exemption provision.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the proposed rule
by March 22, 2011. Submit comments
on information collection issues under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by
February 7, 2011, (see the ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995’’ section of this
document).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
738
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments,
identified by [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–
0646 and/or RIN number 0910–AG39],
by any of the following methods, except
that comments on information
collection issues under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 must be
submitted to the Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) (see the ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995’’ section of this
document).
ADDRESSES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. and Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Annette Marthaler, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug
Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850–3229, 877–287–
1373, annette.marthaler@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Tobacco Control Act, enacted on
June 22, 2009, amends the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
and provides FDA with the authority to
regulate tobacco products (Pub. L. 111–
31, 123 Stat. 1776). Among other things,
the Tobacco Control Act requires that,
before a new tobacco product may be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce, one of the
following must occur: (1) A premarket
application under section 910(b) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387j(b)) must be
submitted to FDA, and FDA must issue
an order finding that the new product
may be introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce
under 910(c) of the FD&C Act; or (2) a
report under section 905(j) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 387e(j)) demonstrating
the new tobacco product’s substantial
equivalence to an appropriate predicate
product (as defined in the FD&C Act)
must be submitted and FDA must issue
an order finding the new product to be
substantially equivalent to the predicate
product and in compliance with the
requirements of the Tobacco Control Act
(section 910(a)(2) of the FD&C Act).
Section 905(j)(3) of the FD&C Act, as
amended, states that FDA may exempt
tobacco products that are modified by
adding or deleting a tobacco additive, or
increasing or decreasing the quantity of
an existing tobacco additive, from the
requirement of demonstrating
substantial equivalence if the Agency
determines that: (1) Such modification
would be a minor modification of a
tobacco product that can be sold under
the FD&C Act, (2) a report
demonstrating substantial equivalence
is not necessary to ensure that
permitting the product to be marketed
would be appropriate for the protection
of the public health, and (3) an
exemption is otherwise appropriate.
Section 905(j)(3)(B) of the FD&C Act
requires FDA to issue regulations
implementing this provision by July 1,
2011.
‘‘Additive’’ is defined at section 900(1)
of the FD&C Act, as ‘‘any substance the
intended use of which results or may
reasonably be expected to result,
directly or indirectly, in its becoming a
component or otherwise affecting the
characteristic of any tobacco product
(including any substances intended for
use as a flavoring or coloring or in
producing, manufacturing, packing,
processing, preparing, treating,
packaging, transporting, or holding),
except that such term does not include
tobacco or a pesticide chemical residue
in or on raw tobacco or a pesticide
chemical’’ (21 U.S.C. 387(1)).
The proposed rule, if finalized, would
establish a pathway for manufacturers,
including importers, to request
exemptions from the substantial
equivalence requirements of the
Tobacco Control Act. It would not
establish categories of minor
modifications, or identify specific
modifications, that meet the statutory
criteria for exemptions. As FDA
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
acquires more information about the
additives in tobacco products from
which to establish such categorical
exemptions, it may issue additional
regulations or guidance. FDA requests
comment on how best to establish
categories for these exemptions.
A manufacturer who obtains an
exemption under the procedures of this
proposed rule is also required to report
to FDA under 905(j)(1)(A)(ii) of the
FD&C Act (this requirement is not
addressed in this proposed rule).
Section 905(j)(1)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act
requires the manufacturer to report at
least 90 days prior to introducing or
delivering for introduction into
interstate commerce the tobacco product
that is the subject of the exemption, the
basis for the manufacturer’s
determination that ‘‘the tobacco product
is modified within the meaning of
[section 905(j)(3)], the modifications are
to a product that is commercially
marketed and in compliance with the
requirements of this Act, and all of the
modifications are covered by
exemptions granted by FDA pursuant to
[section 905(j)(3)]’’ (section
905(j)(1)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act). In
addition, this submission must describe
‘‘action taken by [the applicant] to
comply with the requirements under
section 907 that are applicable to the
tobacco product’’ (section 905(j)(1)(B) of
the FD&C Act).
The proposed rule includes a
procedural mechanism for rescinding an
exemption where necessary to protect
the public health. Before rescinding an
exemption, FDA proposes to provide the
manufacturer notice of the proposed
rescission and an opportunity for an
informal hearing under part 16 (21 CFR
part 16), unless the continuance of the
exemption presents a serious risk to
public health. If the continuance of the
exemption presents a serious risk to
public health, FDA would rescind the
exemption prior to giving notice and an
opportunity for a hearing, and provide
notice and opportunity for an informal
hearing under part 16 as quickly as
possible following the rescission.
II. Overview of the Proposed Rule
As required by section 905(j)(3)(B) of
the FD&C Act, this rule would
implement section 905(j)(3) of the FD&C
Act. Specifically, the rule would
provide that FDA may exempt tobacco
products that are modified by adding or
deleting a tobacco additive, or
increasing or decreasing the quantity of
an existing tobacco additive, if FDA
determines that the modification would
be a minor modification of a tobacco
product that can be sold under the
FD&C Act; a 905(j) report demonstrating
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
substantial equivalence to a predicate
tobacco product is not necessary to
ensure that permitting the tobacco
product to be marketed would be
appropriate for protection of the public
health; and an exemption is otherwise
appropriate. These criteria are specified
in the statute.
The proposed rule also explains that
an exemption request may be made only
by the manufacturer of a legally,
commercially marketed tobacco product
for a minor modification to that
manufacturer’s product. FDA is
proposing this requirement because it
believes that only the manufacturer of
the product being modified will have,
and be able to provide to FDA, sufficient
and complete information about the
product and the proposed modification.
This includes information about a
tobacco product that is trade secret or
confidential commercial information
and available only to the manufacturer
of the product. Such information is
necessary to allow FDA to determine
whether the tobacco product and
modification satisfy the criteria for
exemption.
The proposed rule would also require
that the exemption request (and
supporting information) be submitted in
an electronic format that FDA can
process, review, and archive. FDA
intends to provide and update
information on its website on how
manufactures may provide the
electronic submission to FDA (e.g.,
information on electronic media and
methods of transmission). The proposed
rule would also require that the
exemption request be legible (FDA must
be able to read the document) and in
English. These requirements would
ensure that FDA could review the
exemption request expeditiously and
appropriately. Electronic submission of
information is consistent with the
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
(Pub. L. 105–277) requirement that
Federal agencies allow individuals or
entities to submit information or
transact business with the agency
electronically. Because of the broad
availability of the Internet, FDA does
not anticipate any need to submit an
exemption request and supporting
information in a non-electronic format.
However, a company that is not able to
submit an exemption request in an
electronic format may submit a written
request to the Center for Tobacco
Products explaining in detail why the
company cannot submit the request in
an electronic format and requesting an
alternative format.
The proposed rule would require that
an exemption request be submitted with
supporting documentation and contain
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
the manufacturer’s address and contact
information; a detailed explanation of
the purpose for the modification; a
detailed description of the modification,
including whether the modification
involves adding or deleting a tobacco
additive, or increasing or decreasing the
quantity of an existing tobacco additive;
a detailed explanation of why the
modification is considered a minor
modification of a tobacco product that
can be sold under the FD&C Act; a
detailed explanation of why a report
intended to demonstrate substantial
equivalence is not necessary to ensure
that permitting the tobacco product to
be marketed would be appropriate for
the protection of public health; a
certification by a responsible official of
the company, such as the chief
executive officer, summarizing the
supporting evidence and providing the
rationale for the official’s determination
that the modification will not increase
the product’s toxicity, addictiveness, or
appeal to or use by minors; and other
information justifying an exemption.
The rule would require the
submission of this information, along
with supporting documentation, to
enable FDA to determine whether an
exemption from having to demonstrate
substantial equivalence to an
appropriate predicate product would be
appropriate for the protection of the
public health, as required by the statute
(section 905(j)(3) of the FD&C Act). FDA
requests comment on what supporting
information would be necessary for us
to make these determinations. The
proposed rule would also require a
certification in the form of a signed
statement by a responsible official of the
company, summarizing the supporting
evidence and providing the rationale for
the official’s determination that the
modification will not increase the
product’s toxicity, addictiveness, or
appeal to or use by minors. Because of
the importance of this information to an
exemption determination, FDA is
proposing to require that a responsible
official of the company, such as the
chief executive officer, certify that the
modification will not have these effects.
The proposed regulation explains that
FDA would review the information
submitted in support of the request and
determine whether to grant or deny the
request for an exemption based on
whether the criteria in the statute are
satisfied. The proposed rule also
provides that, if FDA determines that
the information submitted by the
manufacturer is insufficient to enable it
to determine whether an exemption is
appropriate, FDA may request
additional information from the
manufacturer. The rule would also
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
739
provide that if the manufacturer fails to
respond within the timeframe
requested, FDA will consider the
exemption request withdrawn. An
exemption determination will be
publicly available consistent with the
requirements of part 20 (21 CFR part
20); trade secret and confidential
commercial information are exempted
from disclosure requirements consistent
with § 20.61.
As discussed earlier in this document,
the proposed rule includes a provision
expressly permitting FDA to rescind an
exemption if the Agency determines
that rescission is necessary to protect
the public health. FDA believes it is
important that it be able to rescind
exemptions in circumstances where the
exemption is not appropriate for the
public health, such as when FDA’s
decision to grant an exemption was
based on false or incomplete
information. FDA is proposing to
provide notice and an opportunity for
an informal hearing under part 16 to the
manufacturer who requested the
exemption prior to rescinding an
exemption. If, however, the continuance
of the exemption presents a serious risk
to public health, the proposed rule
provides that FDA could rescind the
exemption before providing notice and
an opportunity for a hearing. In that
case, FDA would provide the
manufacturer notice and an opportunity
for a hearing as soon as possible after
the rescission.
Consistent with the requirements of
the FD&C Act, FDA intends to provide
technical and other nonfinancial
assistance to small tobacco product
manufacturers in complying with the
premarket requirements of sections 905
and 910 of the FD&C Act, along with
other requirements (section 901(f) of the
FD&C Act). FDA requests comment on
what technical assistance or guidance
would be helpful to small
manufacturers in complying with these
requirements. Small tobacco product
manufacturers may contact FDA at
smallbiz.tobacco@fda.hhs.gov for
assistance.
III. Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final rule that
issues based on this proposal become
effective 30 days after the final rule
publishes in the Federal Register.
IV. Legal Authority
Section 905(j)(3)(B) of the FD&C Act
requires that FDA issue regulations to
implement the provision on exemptions
from the substantial equivalence
requirements of the Tobacco Control
Act. Section 905(j)(3)(A) of the FD&C
Act provides that FDA may exempt from
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
740
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the requirements relating to the
demonstration of substantial
equivalence tobacco products that are
modified by adding or deleting a
tobacco additive, or increasing or
decreasing the quantity of an existing
tobacco additive, if FDA determines the
modification would be a minor
modification of a tobacco product that
can be sold under the FD&C Act; a
report is not necessary to ensure that
permitting the tobacco product to be
marketed would be appropriate for
protection of the public health; and an
exemption is otherwise appropriate.
FDA is issuing this proposed rule as
required by section 905(j)(3)(B) of the
FD&C Act. Additionally, section 701(a)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371) gives
FDA general rulemaking authority to
issue regulations for the efficient
enforcement of the FD&C Act.
V. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.30(h) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VI. Analysis of Impacts
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
A. Introduction
FDA has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive order
12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4). Executive Order 12866 directs
Agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
agency believes that this proposed rule
is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. The Tobacco Control Act
requires that tobacco product
manufacturers obtain either a marketing
authorization order under section 910(c)
or an order under section 910(a)(2)
finding the new tobacco product to be
substantially equivalent to an
appropriate predicate tobacco product
before introducing a new product into
interstate commerce. Although this
requirement is costly, the option of
requesting an exemption as set forth in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
this proposed rule provides a
mechanism for potentially reducing
costs. If manufacturers of new tobacco
products do not expect this option to
reduce costs associated with their new
product submissions, they will choose
not to use it. The Agency therefore
proposes to certify that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $135
million, using the most current (2009)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
B. Baseline
FDA compares the effects of this rule
to a baseline we will refer to as the poststatute baseline. Under the Tobacco
Control Act, in the absence of this or
other rulemaking under section
905(j)(3), tobacco product manufacturers
must submit to FDA either a premarket
application or a report under section
905(j) demonstrating substantial
equivalence to an appropriate predicate
product, and FDA must issue the
appropriate corresponding order before
a new tobacco product may be
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce. Although
substantial equivalence requirements
are not yet in effect, the statutory grace
period ends on March 22, 2011. The
statutory deadline for issuing
regulations under section 905(j)(3) is
July 1, 2011, after the end of the grace
period. Therefore, under the post-statute
baseline we assume that requirements to
report under 905(j) will be in effect.
Compared with the cost associated with
the post-statute baseline, this rule may
result in cost savings if some tobacco
manufacturers request, and are granted,
substantial equivalence exemptions. If
for any reason this proposed rule is
finalized before the substantial
equivalence requirements go into effect,
it would simply have no effect until
such time that they do.
C. Number of Affected Entities
This proposed rule may potentially
apply to any tobacco product
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
manufacturer or importer whose
products are regulated under the
Tobacco Control Act. Statistics of U.S.
Businesses data indicate that there are
20 cigarette manufacturers and 46 other
tobacco product manufacturers (U.S.
Census, 2009). Because other tobacco
product manufacturers would include
cigar and pipe tobacco manufacturers,
not all 46 firms represent manufacturers
that are currently regulated under the
Tobacco Control Act.1 An unknown
number of importers would be affected.2
Not all new tobacco products are
expected to meet the statutory
requirements for an exemption.
Furthermore, FDA is not establishing
categories of minor modifications, or
identifying specific modifications, that
meet the statutory criteria for
exemptions. It is therefore likely that
only a subset of the potentially affected
manufacturers and importers would
choose to request an exemption.
D. Number of Exemption Requests
The number of new products
introduced in a given year is the
theoretical maximum number that could
be introduced under a substantial
equivalence exemption. However, some
new products may not be substantially
equivalent to an appropriate predicate
tobacco product and will require
premarket authorization under section
910(c), in which case they would not be
eligible for a substantial equivalence
exemption. The remaining products
would require 905(j) reports, including
demonstration of substantial
equivalence. Under this proposed rule,
an unknown number of those new 905(j)
products would be eligible for possible
introduction into interstate commerce
under a substantial equivalence
exemption.
FDA uses scanner data covering late
2007 to late 2009 from AC Nielsen to
estimate the number of new tobacco
products introduced in a year. A
Universal Product Code (UPC) is
deemed to be introduced in 2008 if total
dollar sales over the final weeks of 2007
were zero, but total dollar sales over
2008 were greater than zero. Because
unique UPCs are assigned to different
types of packaging for otherwise
identical products, most new UPCs do
not represent new products, but rather
different ways of packaging existing
products. To address this issue, FDA
1 A possible offsetting factor is that these data
only include firms with payroll, and there could be
some small tobacco product manufacturers without
payroll.
2 Manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers could
all theoretically import tobacco products. Census
data do not distinguish firms that import from firms
that do not.
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
sorts the data by brand description, and
by product description within each
brand description. The product
description varies by UPC and contains
information about both product
characteristics and packaging.
Therefore, the product description of
every new UPC can be compared with
the product descriptions preceding and
following it to determine whether the
new UPC represents a new package for
an existing product or a new product
altogether.
Using the scanner data, FDA finds
that of 628 new UPCs for cigarettes in
2008, 151 represent new products not
present in the 2007 data. Of 215 new
UPCs for chewing tobacco, 43 represent
new products. Of 36 new UPCs for
smoking tobacco (excluding pipe
tobacco), 20 represent new products.3
Of 36 new UPCs for cigarette paper, 19
represent new products. This leads to an
estimated 233 new products in 2008.
We assume the same average number of
new products will continue to be
introduced every year going forward.
However, it is also possible that
requirements imposed by the Tobacco
Control Act will lead manufacturers to
introduce new products at a lower rate
in the future.
As outlined previously, some of the
estimated 233 new products introduced
annually may require premarket
authorization under section 910(c), and
exemptions would be requested for an
unknown number of the remaining
products. Although in theory the
maximum number of requests equals the
number of new products, based on the
requirements for an exemption and
experience with other regulated
products, FDA estimates that in the first
years after the procedure is in place,
only 50 exemption requests will be
submitted per year. This may increase
over time as learning takes place. FDA
anticipates requesting additional
information to support 40 of those
requests.
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
E. Benefits and Costs
The main effect of this proposed rule
would be a potential reduction in the
costs of introducing new tobacco
products compared with the post-statute
baseline. Under the baseline scenario,
all new products that do not undergo
premarket review under section 910(c)
3 The smoking tobacco category refers to tobacco
products, other than cigarettes, cigars and
accessories, which are intended to be smoked.
Smoking tobacco products are further identified in
the data as cigarette tobacco (roll-your-own),
smoking tobacco, or pipe tobacco. Since pipe
tobacco is not currently subject to the Tobacco
Control Act, products clearly identified as such are
excluded from the analysis.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
must submit a report under section
905(j) that includes the basis for
manufacturer’s determination that the
new tobacco product is substantially
equivalent to an appropriate predicate
tobacco product. If an exemption
request is submitted and granted, a
manufacturer would be able to submit a
different and potentially shorter 905(j)
report in which, under 905(j)(1)(A)(ii), a
discussion of the exemption is used in
place of the demonstration of
substantial equivalence. On a perproduct basis, any potential cost savings
for the 905(j) report, net of the cost of
requesting the exemption, would be the
savings attributable to this rule.
FDA estimates that it would take 360
hours to prepare an exemption request.
Based on the requirements set forth in
the codified language, FDA anticipates
that preparation of most sections would
require technical scientific and
engineering expertise. Legal input and
review would also play a role.
Therefore, in valuing the time cost, FDA
uses the weighted average of tobacco
manufacturing industry-specific hourly
wages for life, physical, and social
science occupations ($30.91),
architecture and engineering
occupations ($40.93), and legal
occupations ($71.83) (Ref. U.S. BLS,
2010). FDA assigns these occupational
categories weights of 40 percent, 40
percent, and 20 percent. The resulting
composite wage is $43.10. FDA then
doubles this amount to $86.20 to
account for benefits and overhead.
Multiplying by 360 hours yields a cost
per exemption request of $31,033. FDA
anticipates that when it asks a
manufacturer to provide additional
information in support of an exemption
request, it will take an average of 50
hours to prepare the additional
information. Using the same hourly cost
of labor, providing additional
information is estimated to result in an
additional cost of $4,310. These are
elective costs. Firms will not choose to
submit a request unless any potential
cost savings in a 905(j) report justifies
the cost.
Using FDA’s estimate that we expect
to receive 50 requests per year, the total
cost of all exemption requests submitted
would be $1,551,700. There would be
an additional cost of $172,400 if, as
anticipated, we ask for additional
information supporting 40 of the 50
requests. FDA requests comment on
these cost estimates.
Because substantial equivalence
report requirements are not yet being
enforced, and there is no guidance
beyond the contents of the Tobacco
Control Act, FDA does not attempt to
estimate the cost of preparing a 905(j)
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
741
report that includes the demonstration
of substantial equivalence or the cost of
preparing a 905(j) report citing an
exemption. Some manufacturers may
find that, for a particular product,
preparing a 905(j) report that includes
the basis for the manufacturer’s
determination that its new tobacco
product is substantially equivalent to an
appropriate predicate tobacco product
would be costlier than submitting an
exemption request and citing the
exemption in a 905(j) report. Such a
manufacturer may consider submitting
an exemption request. If a manufacturer
finds that the exemption process would
not reduce costs for legally introducing
a new tobacco product, it would
maintain the post-statute status quo and
submit a 905(j) that includes the basis
for the manufacturer’s determination
that its new tobacco product is
substantially equivalent to an
appropriate predicate tobacco product.
FDA requests comment on these
conclusions.
In order to grant an exemption, FDA
must find, among other things, that a
report demonstrating substantial
equivalence would not be necessary to
ensure that permitting the tobacco
product to be marketed would be
appropriate for protection of the public
health. Furthermore, an exemption
could be rescinded if found to be
inappropriate, and the process for
rescission would depend on whether
there is a serious risk to public health.
Therefore, FDA does not anticipate that
setting up a mechanism for obtaining
substantial equivalence exemptions
would result in costs to public health.
FDA requests comment on this
approach.
Under this proposed rule, there may
be uncertainty on the part of
manufacturers as to what kinds of
product modifications may be granted
an exemption and how much
supporting evidence will be required as
the basis for an exemption. If some
manufacturers are more conservative in
requesting exemptions than FDA would
be in granting them, they may not fully
avail themselves of any potential cost
savings. Alternatively, if some
manufacturers are too optimistic about
what types of modifications will be
exempt, they will incur higher costs
because they will have to demonstrate
substantial equivalence in their 905(j)
reports in addition to having submitted
unsuccessful exemption requests.
FDA acknowledges the theoretical
possibility that overall submission costs
could increase as the result of this
uncertainty. This would happen if so
many unsuccessful exemption requests
were submitted that the excess costs
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
742
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
associated with them exceeded any cost
savings from exemptions that were
granted. This situation is unlikely to
occur, especially as time goes on and
manufacturers gain information on
submission costs and the requirements
that must be met for exemptions.
Manufacturers might continue to submit
unsuccessful exemption requests, but it
would increasingly be a well-informed
choice based on an accurate estimation
of the probability of being granted an
exemption and the excess cost of
preparing an unsuccessful request
compared with the cost savings
attributable to an exemption. Moreover,
it is possible that some of the
information compiled for an exemption
request would be reused as part of a
demonstration of substantial
equivalence, thus reducing the effort
expended in preparing both types of
submissions.
F. Conclusion
In summary, the substantial
equivalence exemption requirements
laid out in this proposed rule offer an
additional channel for legally
introducing new tobacco products that
result from minor modifications of
tobacco products that can be sold under
the Tobacco Control Act. Introducing a
new product through this channel may
potentially reduce costs. If
manufacturers find that obtaining an
exemption would not reduce costs, or if
they do not want to risk having to
demonstrate substantial equivalence in
their 905(j) reports in addition to having
submitted unsuccessful exemption
requests, they may choose to maintain
the post-statute status quo and not
pursue substantial equivalence
exemptions.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains
information collection provisions that
are subject to review by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). A
description of these provisions is given
below with an estimate of the annual
reporting burden. Included in the
estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering the data needed, and
completing and reviewing each
collection of information. FDA requests
comment on the burden and practical
utility of the information being
requested. Comment is also requested
on whether the information being
requested is duplicative of other
collections.
Title: Exemptions From Substantial
Equivalence Requirements for Tobacco
Products.
Description: In this proposed rule, a
pathway would be established by FDA
for manufacturers to request exemptions
from the substantial equivalence
requirements of the Tobacco Control
Act. As it acquires more information
about the additives in tobacco products
from which to establish categories of
exemptions, FDA may issue additional
regulations or guidance on this subject.
This rule would implement section
905(j)(3) of the FD&C Act, allowing FDA
to exempt tobacco products that are
modified by adding or deleting a
tobacco additive, or increasing or
decreasing the quantity of an existing
tobacco additive, if FDA determines that
the modification would be a minor
modification of a tobacco product that
can be sold under the FD&C Act. The
rule also explains that an exemption
request may be made only by the
manufacturer of a legally marketed
tobacco product for a minor
modification to that manufacturer’s
product and the request (and supporting
information) must be submitted in an
electronic format that FDA can process,
review, and archive. In addition, the
request and all supporting information
must be legible and in (or translated
into) the English language.
Under the proposal, an exemption
request must be submitted with
supporting documentation and contain
the manufacturer’s address and contact
information, information about the
modification; and an explanation of
why a report intended to demonstrate
substantial equivalence is not necessary.
The request must also contain a
certification by a responsible official
summarizing the supporting evidence
and providing the rationale for the
official’s determination that the
modification will not increase the
product’s toxicity, addictiveness, or
appeal to/use by minors; and include
other information justifying an
exemption. This information would
enable FDA to determine whether the
exemption request would be appropriate
for the protection of the public health.
This proposed rule also includes a
procedural mechanism for rescinding an
exemption where necessary to protect
the public health. In general, FDA
would rescind an exemption only after
providing the manufacturer notice of the
proposed rescission and an opportunity
for an informal hearing under part 16.
However, FDA may rescind an
exemption prior to notice and
opportunity for a hearing under part 16
if the continuance of the exemption
presents a serious risk to public health.
In that case, FDA would provide the
manufacturer an opportunity for a
hearing as soon as possible after the
rescission.
FDA would review the information
submitted in support of the request and
determine whether to grant or deny the
request based on whether the criteria
specified in the statute are satisfied. If
FDA determines that the information
submitted is insufficient to enable it to
determine whether an exemption is
appropriate, FDA may request
additional information from the
manufacturer. If the manufacturer fails
to respond within the timeframe
requested, FDA would consider the
exemption request withdrawn.
Description of Respondent:
Manufacturers of tobacco products who
are requesting an exemption from the
substantial equivalence requirements of
the FD&C Act, as amended by the
Tobacco Control Act.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN
Number of
respondents
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
21 CFR Section
Annual
frequency per
response
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total hours
1107.1(b) ..............................................................................
1107.1(c) ..............................................................................
50
40
1
1
50
40
360
50
18,000
2,000
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
20,000
Table 1 describes the annual reporting
burden as a result of the provisions set
forth in this proposed rule. Based on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
information related to premarket
provisions for other FDA-regulated
products and anticipated interest from
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
industry in this provision, FDA
estimates that it would receive 50
exemption requests annually and that it
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
would take a manufacturer 360 hours to
prepare an exemption request. FDA
estimates that it would need to request
additional data for 40 of these requests,
and that it will take 50 hours to prepare
this data. FDA anticipates using the
rescission authority to respond to one
issue of concern related to an exemption
determination each year (the burden
hours for 21 CFR 1107.1(d) are included
under part 16 hearing regulations, and
are not included in the burden estimates
in table 1 of this document).
The information collection provisions
of this proposed rule have been
submitted to OMB for review. Interested
persons are requested to fax comments
regarding information collection (see
ADDRESSES) to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, OMB. To ensure
that comments on the information
collection are received, OMB
recommends that written comments be
faxed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA
Desk Officer, Fax: 202–395–7285, or
e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
VIII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA
has determined that the proposed rule,
if finalized, would not contain policies
that would have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
Accordingly, the Agency tentatively
concludes that the proposed rule does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
IX. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
X. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES),
and may be seen by interested persons
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site addresses, but we are not
responsible for any subsequent changes
to the Web sites after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)
1. U.S. Census Bureau, 2007
Economic Census, ‘‘Sector 31: EC0731I1:
Manufacturing: Industry Series: Detailed
Statistics by Industry for the United
States: 2007.’’ Release Date: October 30,
2009, Access Date: August 30, 2010,
(https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/
IBQTable?_bm=y&ds_name=EC0731I1&NAICS2007=312210/312221/312229&ib_type=NAICS2007&-geo_id=&_industry=312221&-_lang=en&fds_name=EC0700A1)
2. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
‘‘Occupational Employment Statistics:
May 2009 National Industry-Specific
Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates NAICS 312200—Tobacco
Manufacturing,’’ May 14, 2010, https://
data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/print.pl/oes/
current/naics4_312200.htm.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 16
Administrative practice and
procedure.
21 CFR Part 1107
Tobacco products, Substantial
equivalence, Exemptions.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
21 CFR parts 16 and 1107 be amended
to read as follows:
PART 16—REGULATORY HEARING
BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451–1461; 21 U.S.C.
141–149, 321–394, 467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28
U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201–262, 263b, 364.
§ 16.1
[Amended]
2. In § 16.1 (b)(2) add in numerical
sequence ‘‘§ 1107.1(d), relating to
rescission of an exemption from the
requirement of demonstrating
substantial equivalence for a tobacco
product.’’
3. Add part 1107 to subchapter K to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
743
PART 1107—ESTABLISHMENT
REGISTRATION, PRODUCT LISTING,
AND SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
REPORTS
Subpart A—Exemptions
Sec.
1107.1
Exemptions.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 387e(j) and 387j.
Subpart A—Exemptions
§ 1107.1
Exemptions.
(a) General requirements. Under
section 905(j)(3) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
387e(j)(3)), FDA may exempt from the
requirements relating to the
demonstration that a tobacco product is
substantially equivalent within the
meaning of section 910 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
387j), tobacco products that are
modified by adding or deleting a
tobacco additive, or increasing or
decreasing the quantity of an existing
tobacco additive, if FDA determines
that:
(1) Such modification would be a
minor modification of a tobacco product
that can be sold under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (legally
marketed tobacco product);
(2) A report under section 905(j)(1)
intended to demonstrate substantial
equivalence is not necessary to ensure
that permitting the tobacco product to
be marketed would be appropriate for
protection of the public health; and
(3) An exemption is otherwise
appropriate.
(b) Request for an exemption under
section 905(j)(3) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act. A request for
an exemption from the requirement of
demonstrating substantial equivalence
may be made only by the manufacturer
of a legally marketed tobacco product
for a minor modification to that tobacco
product. To request an exemption, the
manufacturer must submit the request
and all information supporting the
request in an electronic format that FDA
can process, review, and archive. If the
manufacturer is unable to submit an
exemption request in an electronic
format, the manufacturer may submit a
written request to the Center for
Tobacco Products explaining in detail
why the company cannot submit the
request in an electronic format and
requesting an alternative format. Such
request must include an explanation of
why an alternative format is necessary.
In addition, the request and all
supporting information must be legible
and in the English language. An
exemption request must contain:
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
744
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(1) The manufacturer’s address and
contact information;
(2) A detailed explanation of the
purpose for the modification;
(3) A detailed description of the
modification, including a statement as
to whether the modification involves
adding or deleting a tobacco additive, or
increasing or decreasing the quantity of
an existing tobacco additive;
(4) A detailed explanation of why the
modification is a minor modification of
a tobacco product that can be sold under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act;
(5) A detailed explanation of why a
report under section 905(j)(1) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
intended to demonstrate substantial
equivalence is not necessary to ensure
that permitting the tobacco product to
be marketed would be appropriate for
protection of the public health;
(6) A certification (i.e., a signed
statement by a responsible official of the
company) summarizing the supporting
evidence and providing the rationale for
the official’s determination that the
modification does not increase the
tobacco product’s appeal to/use by
minors, toxicity, or addictiveness/abuse
liability; and
(7) Other information justifying an
exemption.
(c) Exemption determination. FDA
will review the information submitted
and determine whether to grant or deny
an exemption request based on whether
the criteria in section 905(j)(3) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
are met. FDA may request additional
information if necessary to make a
determination. FDA will consider the
exemption request withdrawn if the
information is not provided within the
requested timeframe.
(d) Rescission of an exemption. FDA
may rescind an exemption if it finds
that the exemption is not appropriate for
the protection of public health. In
general, FDA will rescind an exemption
only after notice and opportunity for a
hearing under 21 CFR part 16 of this
chapter is provided. However, FDA may
rescind an exemption prior to notice
and opportunity for a hearing under 21
CFR part 16 of this chapter if the
continuance of the exemption presents
a serious risk to public health. In that
case, FDA will provide the
manufacturer an opportunity for a
hearing as soon as possible after the
rescission.
Dated: January 3, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–34 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 230
RIN 0596–AC84
Community Forest and Open Space
Conservation Program
Forest Service, USDA.
Proposed rule, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Public comments are solicited
for this proposed rule which
implements the Community Forest and
Open Space Conservation Program
(CFP) authorized by Section 8003 of the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008. The CFP legislation is an
amendment to the Cooperative Forestry
Assistance Act of 1978. The CFP is a
competitive grant program whereby
local governments, Tribal Governments,
and qualified non-profit organizations
are eligible to apply for grants to
establish community forests. The
program’s two purposes are to assist
communities in acquiring forestland
that would provide public recreation,
environmental and economic benefits,
and forest-based educational programs,
and to protect forestland that has been
identified as a national, regional, or
local priority for protection. Existing
provisions in Forest Service regulations
pertaining to the Stewardship Incentive
Program will be removed as
deauthorized by the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002, and this
proposed rule will be substituted in lieu
thereof.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by March 7, 2011 Pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act,
comments on the information collection
burden that would result from this
proposal must be received by March 7,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
concerning this notice should be
addressed to Community Forest
Program, U.S. Forest Service, State and
Private Forestry, Cooperative Forestry,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Code
1123, Washington, DC 20250.
Comments may also be sent via email to
communityforest@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to (202) 205–1271. All
comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at U.S.
Forest Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Code 1123, Washington,
DC 20250. Those wishing to inspect
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments are encouraged to call ahead
to (202) 205–1389 to facilitate entry to
the building.
Comments concerning the
information collection requirements
contained in this action should
reference OMB No. 0596–New, the
docket number, date, and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register.
Comments should be sent to the address
listed in the above paragraph.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maya Solomon, U.S. Forest Service,
State and Private Forestry, Cooperative
Forestry, (202) 205–1376. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Proposed
Rule
Congress authorized the Community
Forest and Open Space Conservation
Program (hereafter ‘‘CFP’’) to address the
needs of communities to protect and
maintain their forest resources. In the
CFP authorization, Congress found that
people derive health benefits from
having access to forests for recreation
and exercise. Congress also found that
forests protect public water supplies
and may provide financial benefits from
forest products. The CFP is a
competitive grant program whereby
local governments, Tribal Governments,
and qualified non-profit organizations
are eligible to apply for grants to
establish community forests through
fee-simple land acquisitions. ‘‘Feesimple’’ means full ownership and
acquisition of real property, versus a
partial interest such as conservation
easement. By creating community
forests through land acquisition,
communities and Tribes can sustainably
manage forests for these and many other
benefits, including wildlife habitat,
stewardship demonstration sites for
forest landowners, and environmental
education.
While the CFP title includes the term
‘‘open space,’’ the authorizing language
does not discuss the term. The only land
cover Congress references is ‘‘forests.’’
As a result, in this proposed rule, the
term ‘‘open space’’ is also not used, and
is assumed that the only type of ‘‘open
space’’ on which Congress wanted CFP
to focus is ‘‘forests.’’
The Forest Service believes that these
proposed regulations for CFP will
facilitate administration of the program
and provide uniform criteria for
program participation. The program will
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 737-744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-34]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 16 and 1107
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0646]
RIN 0910-AG39
Tobacco Products, Exemptions From Substantial Equivalence
Requirements
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing this
proposed rule to establish procedures for requesting an exemption from
the substantial equivalence requirements of the Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act). The proposed
rule would describe the process and statutory criteria for requesting
an exemption and explain how FDA would review requests for exemptions.
Once finalized, this regulation will satisfy the requirement in the
Tobacco Control Act that FDA issue regulations implementing the
exemption provision.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the proposed
rule by March 22, 2011. Submit comments on information collection
issues under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by February 7, 2011,
(see the ``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' section of this document).
[[Page 738]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [Docket No. FDA-2010-
N-0646 and/or RIN number 0910-AG39], by any of the following methods,
except that comments on information collection issues under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 must be submitted to the Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (see the
``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' section of this document).
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. and Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For additional information on submitting comments, see the
``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annette Marthaler, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850-3229, 877-287-1373, annette.marthaler@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Tobacco Control Act, enacted on June 22, 2009, amends the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) and provides FDA
with the authority to regulate tobacco products (Pub. L. 111-31, 123
Stat. 1776). Among other things, the Tobacco Control Act requires that,
before a new tobacco product may be introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce, one of the following must occur:
(1) A premarket application under section 910(b) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 387j(b)) must be submitted to FDA, and FDA must issue an order
finding that the new product may be introduced or delivered for
introduction into interstate commerce under 910(c) of the FD&C Act; or
(2) a report under section 905(j) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387e(j))
demonstrating the new tobacco product's substantial equivalence to an
appropriate predicate product (as defined in the FD&C Act) must be
submitted and FDA must issue an order finding the new product to be
substantially equivalent to the predicate product and in compliance
with the requirements of the Tobacco Control Act (section 910(a)(2) of
the FD&C Act). Section 905(j)(3) of the FD&C Act, as amended, states
that FDA may exempt tobacco products that are modified by adding or
deleting a tobacco additive, or increasing or decreasing the quantity
of an existing tobacco additive, from the requirement of demonstrating
substantial equivalence if the Agency determines that: (1) Such
modification would be a minor modification of a tobacco product that
can be sold under the FD&C Act, (2) a report demonstrating substantial
equivalence is not necessary to ensure that permitting the product to
be marketed would be appropriate for the protection of the public
health, and (3) an exemption is otherwise appropriate. Section
905(j)(3)(B) of the FD&C Act requires FDA to issue regulations
implementing this provision by July 1, 2011.
``Additive'' is defined at section 900(1) of the FD&C Act, as ``any
substance the intended use of which results or may reasonably be
expected to result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component
or otherwise affecting the characteristic of any tobacco product
(including any substances intended for use as a flavoring or coloring
or in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing,
treating, packaging, transporting, or holding), except that such term
does not include tobacco or a pesticide chemical residue in or on raw
tobacco or a pesticide chemical'' (21 U.S.C. 387(1)).
The proposed rule, if finalized, would establish a pathway for
manufacturers, including importers, to request exemptions from the
substantial equivalence requirements of the Tobacco Control Act. It
would not establish categories of minor modifications, or identify
specific modifications, that meet the statutory criteria for
exemptions. As FDA acquires more information about the additives in
tobacco products from which to establish such categorical exemptions,
it may issue additional regulations or guidance. FDA requests comment
on how best to establish categories for these exemptions.
A manufacturer who obtains an exemption under the procedures of
this proposed rule is also required to report to FDA under
905(j)(1)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act (this requirement is not addressed in
this proposed rule). Section 905(j)(1)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act requires
the manufacturer to report at least 90 days prior to introducing or
delivering for introduction into interstate commerce the tobacco
product that is the subject of the exemption, the basis for the
manufacturer's determination that ``the tobacco product is modified
within the meaning of [section 905(j)(3)], the modifications are to a
product that is commercially marketed and in compliance with the
requirements of this Act, and all of the modifications are covered by
exemptions granted by FDA pursuant to [section 905(j)(3)]'' (section
905(j)(1)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act). In addition, this submission must
describe ``action taken by [the applicant] to comply with the
requirements under section 907 that are applicable to the tobacco
product'' (section 905(j)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
The proposed rule includes a procedural mechanism for rescinding an
exemption where necessary to protect the public health. Before
rescinding an exemption, FDA proposes to provide the manufacturer
notice of the proposed rescission and an opportunity for an informal
hearing under part 16 (21 CFR part 16), unless the continuance of the
exemption presents a serious risk to public health. If the continuance
of the exemption presents a serious risk to public health, FDA would
rescind the exemption prior to giving notice and an opportunity for a
hearing, and provide notice and opportunity for an informal hearing
under part 16 as quickly as possible following the rescission.
II. Overview of the Proposed Rule
As required by section 905(j)(3)(B) of the FD&C Act, this rule
would implement section 905(j)(3) of the FD&C Act. Specifically, the
rule would provide that FDA may exempt tobacco products that are
modified by adding or deleting a tobacco additive, or increasing or
decreasing the quantity of an existing tobacco additive, if FDA
determines that the modification would be a minor modification of a
tobacco product that can be sold under the FD&C Act; a 905(j) report
demonstrating
[[Page 739]]
substantial equivalence to a predicate tobacco product is not necessary
to ensure that permitting the tobacco product to be marketed would be
appropriate for protection of the public health; and an exemption is
otherwise appropriate. These criteria are specified in the statute.
The proposed rule also explains that an exemption request may be
made only by the manufacturer of a legally, commercially marketed
tobacco product for a minor modification to that manufacturer's
product. FDA is proposing this requirement because it believes that
only the manufacturer of the product being modified will have, and be
able to provide to FDA, sufficient and complete information about the
product and the proposed modification. This includes information about
a tobacco product that is trade secret or confidential commercial
information and available only to the manufacturer of the product. Such
information is necessary to allow FDA to determine whether the tobacco
product and modification satisfy the criteria for exemption.
The proposed rule would also require that the exemption request
(and supporting information) be submitted in an electronic format that
FDA can process, review, and archive. FDA intends to provide and update
information on its website on how manufactures may provide the
electronic submission to FDA (e.g., information on electronic media and
methods of transmission). The proposed rule would also require that the
exemption request be legible (FDA must be able to read the document)
and in English. These requirements would ensure that FDA could review
the exemption request expeditiously and appropriately. Electronic
submission of information is consistent with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (Pub. L. 105-277) requirement that Federal agencies
allow individuals or entities to submit information or transact
business with the agency electronically. Because of the broad
availability of the Internet, FDA does not anticipate any need to
submit an exemption request and supporting information in a non-
electronic format. However, a company that is not able to submit an
exemption request in an electronic format may submit a written request
to the Center for Tobacco Products explaining in detail why the company
cannot submit the request in an electronic format and requesting an
alternative format.
The proposed rule would require that an exemption request be
submitted with supporting documentation and contain the manufacturer's
address and contact information; a detailed explanation of the purpose
for the modification; a detailed description of the modification,
including whether the modification involves adding or deleting a
tobacco additive, or increasing or decreasing the quantity of an
existing tobacco additive; a detailed explanation of why the
modification is considered a minor modification of a tobacco product
that can be sold under the FD&C Act; a detailed explanation of why a
report intended to demonstrate substantial equivalence is not necessary
to ensure that permitting the tobacco product to be marketed would be
appropriate for the protection of public health; a certification by a
responsible official of the company, such as the chief executive
officer, summarizing the supporting evidence and providing the
rationale for the official's determination that the modification will
not increase the product's toxicity, addictiveness, or appeal to or use
by minors; and other information justifying an exemption.
The rule would require the submission of this information, along
with supporting documentation, to enable FDA to determine whether an
exemption from having to demonstrate substantial equivalence to an
appropriate predicate product would be appropriate for the protection
of the public health, as required by the statute (section 905(j)(3) of
the FD&C Act). FDA requests comment on what supporting information
would be necessary for us to make these determinations. The proposed
rule would also require a certification in the form of a signed
statement by a responsible official of the company, summarizing the
supporting evidence and providing the rationale for the official's
determination that the modification will not increase the product's
toxicity, addictiveness, or appeal to or use by minors. Because of the
importance of this information to an exemption determination, FDA is
proposing to require that a responsible official of the company, such
as the chief executive officer, certify that the modification will not
have these effects.
The proposed regulation explains that FDA would review the
information submitted in support of the request and determine whether
to grant or deny the request for an exemption based on whether the
criteria in the statute are satisfied. The proposed rule also provides
that, if FDA determines that the information submitted by the
manufacturer is insufficient to enable it to determine whether an
exemption is appropriate, FDA may request additional information from
the manufacturer. The rule would also provide that if the manufacturer
fails to respond within the timeframe requested, FDA will consider the
exemption request withdrawn. An exemption determination will be
publicly available consistent with the requirements of part 20 (21 CFR
part 20); trade secret and confidential commercial information are
exempted from disclosure requirements consistent with Sec. 20.61.
As discussed earlier in this document, the proposed rule includes a
provision expressly permitting FDA to rescind an exemption if the
Agency determines that rescission is necessary to protect the public
health. FDA believes it is important that it be able to rescind
exemptions in circumstances where the exemption is not appropriate for
the public health, such as when FDA's decision to grant an exemption
was based on false or incomplete information. FDA is proposing to
provide notice and an opportunity for an informal hearing under part 16
to the manufacturer who requested the exemption prior to rescinding an
exemption. If, however, the continuance of the exemption presents a
serious risk to public health, the proposed rule provides that FDA
could rescind the exemption before providing notice and an opportunity
for a hearing. In that case, FDA would provide the manufacturer notice
and an opportunity for a hearing as soon as possible after the
rescission.
Consistent with the requirements of the FD&C Act, FDA intends to
provide technical and other nonfinancial assistance to small tobacco
product manufacturers in complying with the premarket requirements of
sections 905 and 910 of the FD&C Act, along with other requirements
(section 901(f) of the FD&C Act). FDA requests comment on what
technical assistance or guidance would be helpful to small
manufacturers in complying with these requirements. Small tobacco
product manufacturers may contact FDA at smallbiz.tobacco@fda.hhs.gov
for assistance.
III. Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final rule that issues based on this proposal
become effective 30 days after the final rule publishes in the Federal
Register.
IV. Legal Authority
Section 905(j)(3)(B) of the FD&C Act requires that FDA issue
regulations to implement the provision on exemptions from the
substantial equivalence requirements of the Tobacco Control Act.
Section 905(j)(3)(A) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt from
[[Page 740]]
the requirements relating to the demonstration of substantial
equivalence tobacco products that are modified by adding or deleting a
tobacco additive, or increasing or decreasing the quantity of an
existing tobacco additive, if FDA determines the modification would be
a minor modification of a tobacco product that can be sold under the
FD&C Act; a report is not necessary to ensure that permitting the
tobacco product to be marketed would be appropriate for protection of
the public health; and an exemption is otherwise appropriate. FDA is
issuing this proposed rule as required by section 905(j)(3)(B) of the
FD&C Act. Additionally, section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371)
gives FDA general rulemaking authority to issue regulations for the
efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act.
V. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
VI. Analysis of Impacts
A. Introduction
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs Agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. The Tobacco Control Act requires that tobacco
product manufacturers obtain either a marketing authorization order
under section 910(c) or an order under section 910(a)(2) finding the
new tobacco product to be substantially equivalent to an appropriate
predicate tobacco product before introducing a new product into
interstate commerce. Although this requirement is costly, the option of
requesting an exemption as set forth in this proposed rule provides a
mechanism for potentially reducing costs. If manufacturers of new
tobacco products do not expect this option to reduce costs associated
with their new product submissions, they will choose not to use it. The
Agency therefore proposes to certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $135 million, using the most current (2009) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
B. Baseline
FDA compares the effects of this rule to a baseline we will refer
to as the post-statute baseline. Under the Tobacco Control Act, in the
absence of this or other rulemaking under section 905(j)(3), tobacco
product manufacturers must submit to FDA either a premarket application
or a report under section 905(j) demonstrating substantial equivalence
to an appropriate predicate product, and FDA must issue the appropriate
corresponding order before a new tobacco product may be introduced or
delivered for introduction into interstate commerce. Although
substantial equivalence requirements are not yet in effect, the
statutory grace period ends on March 22, 2011. The statutory deadline
for issuing regulations under section 905(j)(3) is July 1, 2011, after
the end of the grace period. Therefore, under the post-statute baseline
we assume that requirements to report under 905(j) will be in effect.
Compared with the cost associated with the post-statute baseline, this
rule may result in cost savings if some tobacco manufacturers request,
and are granted, substantial equivalence exemptions. If for any reason
this proposed rule is finalized before the substantial equivalence
requirements go into effect, it would simply have no effect until such
time that they do.
C. Number of Affected Entities
This proposed rule may potentially apply to any tobacco product
manufacturer or importer whose products are regulated under the Tobacco
Control Act. Statistics of U.S. Businesses data indicate that there are
20 cigarette manufacturers and 46 other tobacco product manufacturers
(U.S. Census, 2009). Because other tobacco product manufacturers would
include cigar and pipe tobacco manufacturers, not all 46 firms
represent manufacturers that are currently regulated under the Tobacco
Control Act.\1\ An unknown number of importers would be affected.\2\
Not all new tobacco products are expected to meet the statutory
requirements for an exemption. Furthermore, FDA is not establishing
categories of minor modifications, or identifying specific
modifications, that meet the statutory criteria for exemptions. It is
therefore likely that only a subset of the potentially affected
manufacturers and importers would choose to request an exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A possible offsetting factor is that these data only include
firms with payroll, and there could be some small tobacco product
manufacturers without payroll.
\2\ Manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers could all
theoretically import tobacco products. Census data do not
distinguish firms that import from firms that do not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Number of Exemption Requests
The number of new products introduced in a given year is the
theoretical maximum number that could be introduced under a substantial
equivalence exemption. However, some new products may not be
substantially equivalent to an appropriate predicate tobacco product
and will require premarket authorization under section 910(c), in which
case they would not be eligible for a substantial equivalence
exemption. The remaining products would require 905(j) reports,
including demonstration of substantial equivalence. Under this proposed
rule, an unknown number of those new 905(j) products would be eligible
for possible introduction into interstate commerce under a substantial
equivalence exemption.
FDA uses scanner data covering late 2007 to late 2009 from AC
Nielsen to estimate the number of new tobacco products introduced in a
year. A Universal Product Code (UPC) is deemed to be introduced in 2008
if total dollar sales over the final weeks of 2007 were zero, but total
dollar sales over 2008 were greater than zero. Because unique UPCs are
assigned to different types of packaging for otherwise identical
products, most new UPCs do not represent new products, but rather
different ways of packaging existing products. To address this issue,
FDA
[[Page 741]]
sorts the data by brand description, and by product description within
each brand description. The product description varies by UPC and
contains information about both product characteristics and packaging.
Therefore, the product description of every new UPC can be compared
with the product descriptions preceding and following it to determine
whether the new UPC represents a new package for an existing product or
a new product altogether.
Using the scanner data, FDA finds that of 628 new UPCs for
cigarettes in 2008, 151 represent new products not present in the 2007
data. Of 215 new UPCs for chewing tobacco, 43 represent new products.
Of 36 new UPCs for smoking tobacco (excluding pipe tobacco), 20
represent new products.\3\ Of 36 new UPCs for cigarette paper, 19
represent new products. This leads to an estimated 233 new products in
2008. We assume the same average number of new products will continue
to be introduced every year going forward. However, it is also possible
that requirements imposed by the Tobacco Control Act will lead
manufacturers to introduce new products at a lower rate in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The smoking tobacco category refers to tobacco products,
other than cigarettes, cigars and accessories, which are intended to
be smoked. Smoking tobacco products are further identified in the
data as cigarette tobacco (roll-your-own), smoking tobacco, or pipe
tobacco. Since pipe tobacco is not currently subject to the Tobacco
Control Act, products clearly identified as such are excluded from
the analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As outlined previously, some of the estimated 233 new products
introduced annually may require premarket authorization under section
910(c), and exemptions would be requested for an unknown number of the
remaining products. Although in theory the maximum number of requests
equals the number of new products, based on the requirements for an
exemption and experience with other regulated products, FDA estimates
that in the first years after the procedure is in place, only 50
exemption requests will be submitted per year. This may increase over
time as learning takes place. FDA anticipates requesting additional
information to support 40 of those requests.
E. Benefits and Costs
The main effect of this proposed rule would be a potential
reduction in the costs of introducing new tobacco products compared
with the post-statute baseline. Under the baseline scenario, all new
products that do not undergo premarket review under section 910(c) must
submit a report under section 905(j) that includes the basis for
manufacturer's determination that the new tobacco product is
substantially equivalent to an appropriate predicate tobacco product.
If an exemption request is submitted and granted, a manufacturer would
be able to submit a different and potentially shorter 905(j) report in
which, under 905(j)(1)(A)(ii), a discussion of the exemption is used in
place of the demonstration of substantial equivalence. On a per-product
basis, any potential cost savings for the 905(j) report, net of the
cost of requesting the exemption, would be the savings attributable to
this rule.
FDA estimates that it would take 360 hours to prepare an exemption
request. Based on the requirements set forth in the codified language,
FDA anticipates that preparation of most sections would require
technical scientific and engineering expertise. Legal input and review
would also play a role. Therefore, in valuing the time cost, FDA uses
the weighted average of tobacco manufacturing industry-specific hourly
wages for life, physical, and social science occupations ($30.91),
architecture and engineering occupations ($40.93), and legal
occupations ($71.83) (Ref. U.S. BLS, 2010). FDA assigns these
occupational categories weights of 40 percent, 40 percent, and 20
percent. The resulting composite wage is $43.10. FDA then doubles this
amount to $86.20 to account for benefits and overhead. Multiplying by
360 hours yields a cost per exemption request of $31,033. FDA
anticipates that when it asks a manufacturer to provide additional
information in support of an exemption request, it will take an average
of 50 hours to prepare the additional information. Using the same
hourly cost of labor, providing additional information is estimated to
result in an additional cost of $4,310. These are elective costs. Firms
will not choose to submit a request unless any potential cost savings
in a 905(j) report justifies the cost.
Using FDA's estimate that we expect to receive 50 requests per
year, the total cost of all exemption requests submitted would be
$1,551,700. There would be an additional cost of $172,400 if, as
anticipated, we ask for additional information supporting 40 of the 50
requests. FDA requests comment on these cost estimates.
Because substantial equivalence report requirements are not yet
being enforced, and there is no guidance beyond the contents of the
Tobacco Control Act, FDA does not attempt to estimate the cost of
preparing a 905(j) report that includes the demonstration of
substantial equivalence or the cost of preparing a 905(j) report citing
an exemption. Some manufacturers may find that, for a particular
product, preparing a 905(j) report that includes the basis for the
manufacturer's determination that its new tobacco product is
substantially equivalent to an appropriate predicate tobacco product
would be costlier than submitting an exemption request and citing the
exemption in a 905(j) report. Such a manufacturer may consider
submitting an exemption request. If a manufacturer finds that the
exemption process would not reduce costs for legally introducing a new
tobacco product, it would maintain the post-statute status quo and
submit a 905(j) that includes the basis for the manufacturer's
determination that its new tobacco product is substantially equivalent
to an appropriate predicate tobacco product. FDA requests comment on
these conclusions.
In order to grant an exemption, FDA must find, among other things,
that a report demonstrating substantial equivalence would not be
necessary to ensure that permitting the tobacco product to be marketed
would be appropriate for protection of the public health. Furthermore,
an exemption could be rescinded if found to be inappropriate, and the
process for rescission would depend on whether there is a serious risk
to public health. Therefore, FDA does not anticipate that setting up a
mechanism for obtaining substantial equivalence exemptions would result
in costs to public health. FDA requests comment on this approach.
Under this proposed rule, there may be uncertainty on the part of
manufacturers as to what kinds of product modifications may be granted
an exemption and how much supporting evidence will be required as the
basis for an exemption. If some manufacturers are more conservative in
requesting exemptions than FDA would be in granting them, they may not
fully avail themselves of any potential cost savings. Alternatively, if
some manufacturers are too optimistic about what types of modifications
will be exempt, they will incur higher costs because they will have to
demonstrate substantial equivalence in their 905(j) reports in addition
to having submitted unsuccessful exemption requests.
FDA acknowledges the theoretical possibility that overall
submission costs could increase as the result of this uncertainty. This
would happen if so many unsuccessful exemption requests were submitted
that the excess costs
[[Page 742]]
associated with them exceeded any cost savings from exemptions that
were granted. This situation is unlikely to occur, especially as time
goes on and manufacturers gain information on submission costs and the
requirements that must be met for exemptions. Manufacturers might
continue to submit unsuccessful exemption requests, but it would
increasingly be a well-informed choice based on an accurate estimation
of the probability of being granted an exemption and the excess cost of
preparing an unsuccessful request compared with the cost savings
attributable to an exemption. Moreover, it is possible that some of the
information compiled for an exemption request would be reused as part
of a demonstration of substantial equivalence, thus reducing the effort
expended in preparing both types of submissions.
F. Conclusion
In summary, the substantial equivalence exemption requirements laid
out in this proposed rule offer an additional channel for legally
introducing new tobacco products that result from minor modifications
of tobacco products that can be sold under the Tobacco Control Act.
Introducing a new product through this channel may potentially reduce
costs. If manufacturers find that obtaining an exemption would not
reduce costs, or if they do not want to risk having to demonstrate
substantial equivalence in their 905(j) reports in addition to having
submitted unsuccessful exemption requests, they may choose to maintain
the post-statute status quo and not pursue substantial equivalence
exemptions.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains information collection provisions that
are subject to review by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). A description of these provisions is
given below with an estimate of the annual reporting burden. Included
in the estimate is the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering the data needed, and completing and
reviewing each collection of information. FDA requests comment on the
burden and practical utility of the information being requested.
Comment is also requested on whether the information being requested is
duplicative of other collections.
Title: Exemptions From Substantial Equivalence Requirements for
Tobacco Products.
Description: In this proposed rule, a pathway would be established
by FDA for manufacturers to request exemptions from the substantial
equivalence requirements of the Tobacco Control Act. As it acquires
more information about the additives in tobacco products from which to
establish categories of exemptions, FDA may issue additional
regulations or guidance on this subject.
This rule would implement section 905(j)(3) of the FD&C Act,
allowing FDA to exempt tobacco products that are modified by adding or
deleting a tobacco additive, or increasing or decreasing the quantity
of an existing tobacco additive, if FDA determines that the
modification would be a minor modification of a tobacco product that
can be sold under the FD&C Act. The rule also explains that an
exemption request may be made only by the manufacturer of a legally
marketed tobacco product for a minor modification to that
manufacturer's product and the request (and supporting information)
must be submitted in an electronic format that FDA can process, review,
and archive. In addition, the request and all supporting information
must be legible and in (or translated into) the English language.
Under the proposal, an exemption request must be submitted with
supporting documentation and contain the manufacturer's address and
contact information, information about the modification; and an
explanation of why a report intended to demonstrate substantial
equivalence is not necessary. The request must also contain a
certification by a responsible official summarizing the supporting
evidence and providing the rationale for the official's determination
that the modification will not increase the product's toxicity,
addictiveness, or appeal to/use by minors; and include other
information justifying an exemption. This information would enable FDA
to determine whether the exemption request would be appropriate for the
protection of the public health.
This proposed rule also includes a procedural mechanism for
rescinding an exemption where necessary to protect the public health.
In general, FDA would rescind an exemption only after providing the
manufacturer notice of the proposed rescission and an opportunity for
an informal hearing under part 16. However, FDA may rescind an
exemption prior to notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16
if the continuance of the exemption presents a serious risk to public
health. In that case, FDA would provide the manufacturer an opportunity
for a hearing as soon as possible after the rescission.
FDA would review the information submitted in support of the
request and determine whether to grant or deny the request based on
whether the criteria specified in the statute are satisfied. If FDA
determines that the information submitted is insufficient to enable it
to determine whether an exemption is appropriate, FDA may request
additional information from the manufacturer. If the manufacturer fails
to respond within the timeframe requested, FDA would consider the
exemption request withdrawn.
Description of Respondent: Manufacturers of tobacco products who
are requesting an exemption from the substantial equivalence
requirements of the FD&C Act, as amended by the Tobacco Control Act.
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
21 CFR Section Number of frequency per Total annual Hours per Total hours
respondents response responses response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1107.1(b)....................... 50 1 50 360 18,000
1107.1(c)....................... 40 1 40 50 2,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 20,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1 describes the annual reporting burden as a result of the
provisions set forth in this proposed rule. Based on information
related to premarket provisions for other FDA-regulated products and
anticipated interest from industry in this provision, FDA estimates
that it would receive 50 exemption requests annually and that it
[[Page 743]]
would take a manufacturer 360 hours to prepare an exemption request.
FDA estimates that it would need to request additional data for 40 of
these requests, and that it will take 50 hours to prepare this data.
FDA anticipates using the rescission authority to respond to one issue
of concern related to an exemption determination each year (the burden
hours for 21 CFR 1107.1(d) are included under part 16 hearing
regulations, and are not included in the burden estimates in table 1 of
this document).
The information collection provisions of this proposed rule have
been submitted to OMB for review. Interested persons are requested to
fax comments regarding information collection (see ADDRESSES) to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB. To ensure that
comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends
that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202-395-7285, or
e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
VIII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that
the proposed rule, if finalized, would not contain policies that would
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Accordingly, the Agency tentatively concludes that the proposed rule
does not contain policies that have federalism implications as defined
in the Executive order and, consequently, a federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
IX. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
X. References
The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES), and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
(FDA has verified the Web site addresses, but we are not responsible
for any subsequent changes to the Web sites after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)
1. U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census, ``Sector 31: EC0731I1:
Manufacturing: Industry Series: Detailed Statistics by Industry for the
United States: 2007.'' Release Date: October 30, 2009, Access Date:
August 30, 2010, (https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/IBQTable?_bm=y&-ds_name=EC0731I1&-NAICS2007=312210/312221/312229&-ib_type=NAICS2007&-geo_id=&-_industry=312221&-_lang=en&-fds_name=EC0700A1)
2. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ``Occupational Employment
Statistics: May 2009 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment
and Wage Estimates NAICS 312200--Tobacco Manufacturing,'' May 14, 2010,
https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/print.pl/oes/current/naics4_312200.htm.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 16
Administrative practice and procedure.
21 CFR Part 1107
Tobacco products, Substantial equivalence, Exemptions.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is
proposed that 21 CFR parts 16 and 1107 be amended to read as follows:
PART 16--REGULATORY HEARING BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 16 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451-1461; 21 U.S.C. 141-149, 321-394,
467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28 U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201-262, 263b, 364.
Sec. 16.1 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 16.1 (b)(2) add in numerical sequence ``Sec.
1107.1(d), relating to rescission of an exemption from the requirement
of demonstrating substantial equivalence for a tobacco product.''
3. Add part 1107 to subchapter K to read as follows:
PART 1107--ESTABLISHMENT REGISTRATION, PRODUCT LISTING, AND
SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE REPORTS
Subpart A--Exemptions
Sec.
1107.1 Exemptions.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 387e(j) and 387j.
Subpart A--Exemptions
Sec. 1107.1 Exemptions.
(a) General requirements. Under section 905(j)(3) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 387e(j)(3)), FDA may exempt
from the requirements relating to the demonstration that a tobacco
product is substantially equivalent within the meaning of section 910
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 387j), tobacco
products that are modified by adding or deleting a tobacco additive, or
increasing or decreasing the quantity of an existing tobacco additive,
if FDA determines that:
(1) Such modification would be a minor modification of a tobacco
product that can be sold under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(legally marketed tobacco product);
(2) A report under section 905(j)(1) intended to demonstrate
substantial equivalence is not necessary to ensure that permitting the
tobacco product to be marketed would be appropriate for protection of
the public health; and
(3) An exemption is otherwise appropriate.
(b) Request for an exemption under section 905(j)(3) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. A request for an exemption from the
requirement of demonstrating substantial equivalence may be made only
by the manufacturer of a legally marketed tobacco product for a minor
modification to that tobacco product. To request an exemption, the
manufacturer must submit the request and all information supporting the
request in an electronic format that FDA can process, review, and
archive. If the manufacturer is unable to submit an exemption request
in an electronic format, the manufacturer may submit a written request
to the Center for Tobacco Products explaining in detail why the company
cannot submit the request in an electronic format and requesting an
alternative format. Such request must include an explanation of why an
alternative format is necessary. In addition, the request and all
supporting information must be legible and in the English language. An
exemption request must contain:
[[Page 744]]
(1) The manufacturer's address and contact information;
(2) A detailed explanation of the purpose for the modification;
(3) A detailed description of the modification, including a
statement as to whether the modification involves adding or deleting a
tobacco additive, or increasing or decreasing the quantity of an
existing tobacco additive;
(4) A detailed explanation of why the modification is a minor
modification of a tobacco product that can be sold under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
(5) A detailed explanation of why a report under section 905(j)(1)
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act intended to demonstrate
substantial equivalence is not necessary to ensure that permitting the
tobacco product to be marketed would be appropriate for protection of
the public health;
(6) A certification (i.e., a signed statement by a responsible
official of the company) summarizing the supporting evidence and
providing the rationale for the official's determination that the
modification does not increase the tobacco product's appeal to/use by
minors, toxicity, or addictiveness/abuse liability; and
(7) Other information justifying an exemption.
(c) Exemption determination. FDA will review the information
submitted and determine whether to grant or deny an exemption request
based on whether the criteria in section 905(j)(3) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act are met. FDA may request additional information
if necessary to make a determination. FDA will consider the exemption
request withdrawn if the information is not provided within the
requested timeframe.
(d) Rescission of an exemption. FDA may rescind an exemption if it
finds that the exemption is not appropriate for the protection of
public health. In general, FDA will rescind an exemption only after
notice and opportunity for a hearing under 21 CFR part 16 of this
chapter is provided. However, FDA may rescind an exemption prior to
notice and opportunity for a hearing under 21 CFR part 16 of this
chapter if the continuance of the exemption presents a serious risk to
public health. In that case, FDA will provide the manufacturer an
opportunity for a hearing as soon as possible after the rescission.
Dated: January 3, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-34 Filed 1-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P