General Administrative Regulations; Good-Performance Refunds, 718-721 [2011-14]
Download as PDF
718
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 4
Thursday, January 6, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 400
RIN 0563–AC28
General Administrative Regulations;
Good-Performance Refunds
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend
the General Administrative Regulations
by adding a new subpart Y to provide
a Good-Performance Refund (GPR) to
producers who have demonstrated
favorable crop insurance performance
evidenced by a very limited number of
claims experienced over a specified
number of years participating Federal
crop insurance programs. The GPR will
recognize an individual producer’s
contributions to favorable program
performance as authorized under
section 508(d)(3) of the Federal Crop
Insurance Act (Act). In addition, new or
beginning producers demonstrating
favorable crop insurance performance
may also be recognized for initial
participation in the program.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business January 21, 2011
and will be considered when the rule is
to be made final.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments, titled
‘‘Good-Performance Refund Proposed
Rule’’, by any of the following methods:
• By Mail to: Leiann Nelson, Product
Management, Risk Management Agency,
United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility—Mail Stop
0801, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, MO
64141–6205.
• By Express Mail to: Leiann Nelson,
Product Management, Risk Management
Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0801,
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
9240 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, MO
64131–3055.
• E-Mail: DirectorPDD@rma.usda.gov.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
A copy of each response will be
available for public inspection and
copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., CST,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leiann Nelson, Senior Underwriter,
Product Management, Risk Management
Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0801,
P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, MO
64141–6205, telephone (816) 926–7394.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, it has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
Regulatory Impact Analysis
A Regulatory Impact Analysis has
been completed and is available to
interested persons from the Kansas City
address listed above. In summary, the
analysis finds that the benefits of Good
Performance Refunds will outweigh the
expenses of the program. Good
Performance Refunds will return a
portion of producer paid premium back
to producers who purchase crop
insurance for their risk management
needs, pursue loss prevention and loss
reduction methods, and demonstrate
good farming practices, providing, in
effect, a premium discount to individual
producers demonstrating a series of
good years with very few losses in their
insurance history.
The Good Performance Refund
program will specifically encourage
sound management practices as well as
encouraging insured producers to
continue participation in the crop
insurance program. Benefits to insured’s
who qualify for the program based on
their individual number of insured
years and losses, will be cash refunds of
premium based on their out-of-pocket
premium amount. Cash refunds are
estimated on average to be slightly over
$1,000 for the 2011 refund and will vary
annually depending on the number of
producers qualifying, and, once
qualified, the individual insured’s
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
number of years of insurance history
and amount of insurance purchased.
The return of some previously paid
premium dollars may be used to offset
anticipated increases in the costs of
production inputs or higher crop
insurance premiums due to higher crop
prices and, in some cases, higher
volatility of prices. With these higher
anticipated costs, these benefits allow
producers to continue purchasing
higher levels of crop insurance.
The GPR program will, additionally,
encourage insureds not to claim small or
insignificant losses so they may qualify
for a refund later. Small losses present
administrative costs to insurance
providers, the government, and
taxpayers that can add up programwide. Any reduction of these types of
losses can result, long-term, in decreases
in administrative costs of the program as
well as possible decreases for future
premium rates and corresponding
subsidy amounts, thus benefiting
insureds, insurance providers, the
government and taxpayers.
GPR costs to the government are
estimated at $75 million annually.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), there are no
paperwork implications involved with
this rule.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act of 2002, to
promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. GPR payments for the Federal
crop insurance program are calculated
using the same method for all producers
regardless of the size of their farming
operation. The amount of work required
of the insurance companies will not
increase because the information must
already be collected under the present
regulations, policies and procedures
approved by the FCIC and by the Risk
Management Agency of the United
States Department of Agriculture
(RMA), and the GPR payments will be
issued by RMA on behalf of FCIC. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988
on civil justice reform. The provisions
of this rule will preempt State and local
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
laws to the extent such State and local
laws are inconsistent herewith. With
respect to any direct action taken by
FCIC, the administrative appeal
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11
must be exhausted before any action
against FCIC for judicial review may be
brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
Section 508(d)(3) of the Federal Crop
Insurance Act (Act) authorizes the
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
(FCIC) to provide a performance-based
premium discount to a producer of an
agricultural commodity who has good
insurance or production experience
relative to other producers of that
agricultural commodity in the same area
and as determined by the FCIC.
The proposed rule will implement a
GPR program to producers meeting the
qualifications for years of participation
in the Federal crop insurance program
combined with a limited number of
losses, demonstrating favorable program
performance. In addition, any new or
beginning producers may be recognized
for initial participation in the program
who also demonstrated favorable
program performance.
GPR payments will not exceed $75
million unless FCIC makes an
announcement of an alternative amount
in a notice published in the Federal
Register. Based on the net paid premium
of qualifying producers and the total
amount designated for GPR payments, a
premium percentage will be determined
to apply to all producers who meet the
program qualification requirements.
Good cause is shown to provide a
shortened comment period because the
provisions of this rule are straightforward, so a shortened comment period
still allows enough time for the public
to provide meaningful comments.
While the premium to purchase buyup levels of coverage in the Federal crop
insurance program already receive
substantial subsidies, these subsidies
are not tied to an individual producer’s
performance. The good performance
refund will provide a tool to encourage
producers to mitigate small losses.
Producers will soon be making
decisions regarding the upcoming crop
year so knowing and understanding the
benefits of this rule will allow
producers to take more timely actions to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
719
purchase the necessary buy-up levels of
coverage required for qualification for a
good performance refund, and to reduce
or prevent small losses that could
otherwise jeopardize their future
qualifications for such refund. To the
extent losses are mitigated or reduced in
the Federal crop insurance program,
premium rates also may be lower, in
turn reducing program costs to
producers, the government, and
taxpayers.
A longer comment period, such as a
60 day period, would delay the
implementation of this rule and the
payment of any refunds hereunder, until
well after the normal spring planting
season for most 2011 crops. By delaying
these refunds, producers will not be
able to use them to help finance their
2011 spring operations. In addition, in
the coming weeks, producers will be
making decisions regarding the
upcoming crop year so knowing and
understanding the benefits of this rule
will allow producers to take more
timely actions to purchase the necessary
buy-up levels of coverage required for
qualification for a good performance
refund, and to reduce or prevent small
losses that could otherwise jeopardize
their future qualifications for such
refund. To the extent losses are
mitigated or reduced in the crop
insurance program, premium rates also
may be lower, in turn reducing program
costs to producers, the government, and
taxpayers.
The agency believes that requirements
governing the payment of a good
performance refund are straightforward. There are a limited number of
ways that such refunds can be provided
within the context of the Federal crop
insurance program. Therefore, a lengthy
delay of implementation of the program
is unnecessary and contrary to
providing the benefits to producers
receiving these refunds in time for them
to be used to help finance their spring
2011 operations. For the reasons stated
above, good cause is shown to limit the
comment period to 15 days for this rule
as a lengthy comment period is not
practicable and would be contrary to the
public interest.
The GPR is applicable to the 2011 and
succeeding calendar years as long as
funds are available for GPR payments.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400
Administrative practice and
procedure, Crop insurance.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to add a new
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
720
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
subpart Y to 7 CFR part 400 to read as
follows:
PART 400—GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
Subpart Y—Good-Performance Refunds
Sec.
400.800 Basis and applicability.
400.801 Definitions.
400.802 Eligibility requirements.
400.803 New or beginning producers.
400.804 Payments.
400.805 GPR announcements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(o).
Subpart Y—Good-Performance
Refunds
§ 400.800
Basis and applicability.
(a) The regulations contained in this
subpart describe the eligibility
requirements, rules, and criteria for
receiving a Good-Performance Refund
(GPR).
(b) GPR payments will be made
annually generally during the first
quarter of the calendar year, provided
funds are available.
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 400.801
Definitions.
Base period. A period of crop
insurance program performance used to
determine an individual producer’s net
paid premium including the base year
and nine years prior to the base year.
For example: If the base year is 2009,
the base period includes years 2000
through 2009.
Base year. The last crop year that has
been completed and all claims would
normally have been paid. The base year
is used to establish the base period. For
example: A payment for the 2011
calendar year will be based on
information containing the producer’s
crop insurance experience with a base
year of 2009 because claims for the 2010
crop year would not all have been
finalized. For a 2012 calendar year
payment the base year would be 2010.
Buy-up coverage level. A level of
coverage greater than catastrophic risk
protection. This level of insurance may
also be referred to as ‘‘additional
coverage.’’
FCIC. Has the same meaning as
contained in section 1 of the Common
Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
(Basic Provisions) (7 CFR § 457.8).
Net paid premium. For the base
period, total premium for all crops and
units insured by the producer less the
total premium subsidy and any
indemnities received. Indemnities will
include all payments for all claims
except those designated as replant
payments.
New or beginning producers. A
producer who has not participated in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
any farming or ranching operation,
either as a primary entity or as a person
having a SBI in the operation, for any
crop year prior to the two crop years
immediately preceding the base year.
Example: New or beginning producers
for a GPR payment authorized for the
2011 crop year could have been
involved as a primary operator or a SBI
in any farm or ranch in 2007, 2008, and
2009 but could not have been a primary
operator or have a SBI in any farm or
ranch for any crop year prior to 2007.
Percentage of net paid premium. A
percentage determined by FCIC and
used to calculate the GPR, based on the
total funds determined by FCIC to be
available for the GPR program and the
total net paid premium of all qualified
producers. The percent of net paid
premium will not exceed 15 percent.
(The percentage of net paid premium is
adjusted to account for the minimum
and maximum allowable payments and
new or beginning producer payments.)
Positive net paid premium. When the
net paid premium is greater than one.
Substantial beneficial interest (SBI).
Has the same meaning as contained in
section 1 of the Basic Provisions and
any applicable procedures.
§ 400.802
Eligibility requirements.
To be eligible for a GPR payment, a
producer must:
(a) Have been a participant in any
Federal crop insurance program at the
buy-up coverage level for at least one
insurance policy that earned premium
for the base year.
(b) Not be determined to be ineligible
in accordance with the Basic Provisions
or subpart U of this part, for the crop
year subsequent to the base year. For
example, if the 2009 crop year is the
base year, the insured must not be
determined to be ineligible for the 2010
crop year.
(c) Have used the same social security
number or employer identification
number to identify the primary insured
entity throughout the base period.
(d) Meet the following goodperformance requirements of:
(1) In the case of a producer with
seven to ten years of program
participation during the base period:
(i) Not more than 1 year with a
reported loss, and
(ii) Have a positive net paid premium
for the program participation period; or
(2) In the case of a program with four
to six years of program participation
during the base period of having no
years with a reported loss.
§ 400.803
New or beginning producers.
(a) New or beginning producers will
be eligible for a GPR payment for any
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
given year when GPR payments are
made, unless FCIC publishes an
announcement, as specified in
§ 400.805, stating otherwise.
(b) New or beginning producers must
meet the requirements of §§ 400.802(a),
(b), and (c).
(c) New or beginning producers will
be required to sign a certification
statement that they meet the
requirements to be designated as a new
or beginning producer in order to be
eligible for a GPR payment.
(d) New or beginning producers must
demonstrate favorable program
performance by participating in the
Federal crop insurance program for the
most recent one to three years of the
base period, and have a positive net
paid premium for that period of
participation.
§ 400.804
Payments.
(a) Aggregated premium and
indemnity for all crops insured in all
counties under a qualifying producer’s
social security number or employer
identification number will be used to
calculate the GPR.
(b) Except as provided herein, in the
case of a new or beginning producer, the
net paid premium percentage will be
reduced by 50 percent of the percentage
paid to producers who are not new or
beginning. For example: If the percent of
net paid premium is 8 percent for
producers who are not new or beginning
producers, then new and beginning
producers will receive a GPR of 4
percent of net paid premium, unless an
adjustment is needed due to a larger
number of certifying new or beginning
producers than is anticipated.
(c) GPR payments under this section
will not exceed $75 million. If amounts
to be paid exceed $75 million due to a
larger than anticipated number of
producers that certify they are new or
beginning, then FCIC will adjust the
percentage refund for new or beginning
producers, contained in paragraph (b) of
this section, downward.
(d) Subject to paragraph (e) of this
section, GPR payments will be
calculated as follows:
(1) For producers, other than new or
beginning producers, multiply the
percent of net paid premium by the
individual producer’s net paid
premium; and
(2) For new and beginning producers,
multiply the percent of net paid
premium by .50, unless adjusted in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, and then multiply the result by
the individual producer’s net paid
premium.
(e) A GPR payment will:
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(1) Not be made unless it is at least
$25; and
(2) Be capped at $25,000 for
calculated GPR payments larger than
$25,000, regardless of the calculated
payment.
(f) All GPR payments will be
considered final with no adjustments,
modifications, additions or deletions,
except as specified in paragraphs (g) and
(h) of this section, and will be based on
data contained in the RMA crop
insurance database as of the end of the
first full week in January of the year the
GPR payment is authorized, unless FCIC
publishes an announcement in
accordance with § 400.805 providing a
different date. For example: For GPR
payments made for the 2011 calendar
year, the data used would be as of the
end of the first full week in January
2011.
(g) Any qualifying producer involved
in arbitration, litigation, or mediation
will not receive a payment until the
legal proceedings have been resolved.
(h) If a producer receives a GPR
payment under this subpart and is
determined to be ineligible for the crop
year subsequent to the base year or is at
any time determined to not meet the
requirements of § 400.803, the GPR
payment must be repaid to FCIC in
accordance with section 24 of the Basic
Provisions and any applicable
procedures.
§ 400.805
GPR announcements.
FCIC will post information on the
RMA Web site, at https://
www.rma.usda.gov or a successor Web
site, to provide the public with
information regarding the GPR for a
calendar year.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 3,
2011.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011–14 Filed 1–4–11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
[Docket 90–NM–267–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Model G–1159
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
This action withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed a new airworthiness
directive (AD) to supersede an existing
AD, applicable to certain Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Model G–1159
airplanes. The existing AD requires an
inspection to detect cracks or corrosion
in the wing structure in the area of
Fuselage Station (FS) 452 inboard
clothespin attachment fitting, and repair
if necessary. The proposed AD would
have required repetitive inspections to
detect corrosion or cracks in the forward
and aft wing attach fittings at FS 345
and 452, respectively, and adjacent
wing beam and wing plank areas, and
repair if necessary; and the application
of corrosion protection treatment. Since
the issuance of the NPRM, the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) has
received new data that indicate the
aircraft maintenance manual has been
revised to include additional
inspections that address the unsafe
condition detailed in the NPRM and
that the full fleet is in compliance with
the inspection and applicable repair
required by the existing AD.
Accordingly, the proposed rule is
withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carey O’Kelley, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College
Park, Georgia 30337; telephone (404)
474–5543; fax (404) 474–5606.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
add a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation Model G–1159 airplanes,
was published in the Federal Register
as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) on January 2, 1991 (56 FR 33).
The proposed rule would have
superseded an existing airworthiness
directive (AD 90–13–02, Amendment
39–6660 (55 FR 29008, July 17, 1990)),
applicable to certain Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Model G–1159
airplanes. The existing AD currently
requires an inspection to detect cracks
or corrosion in the wing structure in the
area of Fuselage Station (FS) 452
inboard clothespin attachment fitting,
and repair if necessary. The NPRM
proposed to require additional repetitive
inspections to detect corrosion or cracks
in the forward and aft wing attach
fittings at FS 345 and 452, respectively,
and adjacent wing beam and wing plank
areas, and repair if necessary; and the
application of corrosion protection
treatment. The NPRM resulted from a
review of the inspection reports
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
721
submitted in response to the existing
AD. The proposed actions were
intended to prevent significantly
reduced structural integrity of the wing/
fuselage attachment joint, and the
inability to carry flight or ground loads.
Actions That Occurred Since the NPRM
Was Issued
Since the issuance of that NPRM,
Gulfstream has revised Chapter 5,
inspection program (continued
airworthiness), of the aircraft
maintenance manual (AMM) to include
additional inspections that address the
unsafe condition detailed in the NPRM.
We have also received data that shows
full fleet compliance with the
inspection and applicable repair
required by AD 90–13–02.
FAA’s Conclusions
Upon further consideration, the FAA
has determined that the actions required
by AD 90–13–02 adequately addressed
the identified unsafe condition.
Therefore, it is not necessary to mandate
the repetitive inspections specified in
the Gulfstream AMM. Accordingly, the
proposed rule is hereby withdrawn.
Withdrawal of this NPRM constitutes
only such action, and does not preclude
the agency from issuing another action
in the future, nor does it commit the
agency to any course of action in the
future.
Regulatory Impact
Since this action only withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking, it is
neither a proposed nor a final rule and
therefore is not covered under Executive
Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking, Docket 90–NM–267–AD,
published in the Federal Register on
January 2, 1991 (56 FR 33), is
withdrawn.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 27, 2010.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–54 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 718-721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 718]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 400
RIN 0563-AC28
General Administrative Regulations; Good-Performance Refunds
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend the General Administrative Regulations by adding a new subpart Y
to provide a Good-Performance Refund (GPR) to producers who have
demonstrated favorable crop insurance performance evidenced by a very
limited number of claims experienced over a specified number of years
participating Federal crop insurance programs. The GPR will recognize
an individual producer's contributions to favorable program performance
as authorized under section 508(d)(3) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act
(Act). In addition, new or beginning producers demonstrating favorable
crop insurance performance may also be recognized for initial
participation in the program.
DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be
accepted until close of business January 21, 2011 and will be
considered when the rule is to be made final.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments, titled
``Good-Performance Refund Proposed Rule'', by any of the following
methods:
By Mail to: Leiann Nelson, Product Management, Risk
Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Beacon
Facility--Mail Stop 0801, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141-6205.
By Express Mail to: Leiann Nelson, Product Management,
Risk Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Beacon
Facility, Stop 0801, 9240 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64131-3055.
E-Mail: DirectorPDD@rma.usda.gov.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
A copy of each response will be available for public inspection and
copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., CST, Monday through Friday, except
holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leiann Nelson, Senior Underwriter,
Product Management, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0801, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City,
MO 64141-6205, telephone (816) 926-7394.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Regulatory Impact Analysis
A Regulatory Impact Analysis has been completed and is available to
interested persons from the Kansas City address listed above. In
summary, the analysis finds that the benefits of Good Performance
Refunds will outweigh the expenses of the program. Good Performance
Refunds will return a portion of producer paid premium back to
producers who purchase crop insurance for their risk management needs,
pursue loss prevention and loss reduction methods, and demonstrate good
farming practices, providing, in effect, a premium discount to
individual producers demonstrating a series of good years with very few
losses in their insurance history.
The Good Performance Refund program will specifically encourage
sound management practices as well as encouraging insured producers to
continue participation in the crop insurance program. Benefits to
insured's who qualify for the program based on their individual number
of insured years and losses, will be cash refunds of premium based on
their out-of-pocket premium amount. Cash refunds are estimated on
average to be slightly over $1,000 for the 2011 refund and will vary
annually depending on the number of producers qualifying, and, once
qualified, the individual insured's number of years of insurance
history and amount of insurance purchased. The return of some
previously paid premium dollars may be used to offset anticipated
increases in the costs of production inputs or higher crop insurance
premiums due to higher crop prices and, in some cases, higher
volatility of prices. With these higher anticipated costs, these
benefits allow producers to continue purchasing higher levels of crop
insurance.
The GPR program will, additionally, encourage insureds not to claim
small or insignificant losses so they may qualify for a refund later.
Small losses present administrative costs to insurance providers, the
government, and taxpayers that can add up program-wide. Any reduction
of these types of losses can result, long-term, in decreases in
administrative costs of the program as well as possible decreases for
future premium rates and corresponding subsidy amounts, thus benefiting
insureds, insurance providers, the government and taxpayers.
GPR costs to the government are estimated at $75 million annually.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), there are no paperwork implications involved
with this rule.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of 2002,
to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
[[Page 719]]
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that this regulation will not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. GPR payments
for the Federal crop insurance program are calculated using the same
method for all producers regardless of the size of their farming
operation. The amount of work required of the insurance companies will
not increase because the information must already be collected under
the present regulations, policies and procedures approved by the FCIC
and by the Risk Management Agency of the United States Department of
Agriculture (RMA), and the GPR payments will be issued by RMA on behalf
of FCIC. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been prepared since
this regulation does not have an impact on small entities, and,
therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC,
the administrative appeal provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before any action against FCIC for judicial review may be
brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
Section 508(d)(3) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (Act)
authorizes the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to provide a
performance-based premium discount to a producer of an agricultural
commodity who has good insurance or production experience relative to
other producers of that agricultural commodity in the same area and as
determined by the FCIC.
The proposed rule will implement a GPR program to producers meeting
the qualifications for years of participation in the Federal crop
insurance program combined with a limited number of losses,
demonstrating favorable program performance. In addition, any new or
beginning producers may be recognized for initial participation in the
program who also demonstrated favorable program performance.
GPR payments will not exceed $75 million unless FCIC makes an
announcement of an alternative amount in a notice published in the
Federal Register. Based on the net paid premium of qualifying producers
and the total amount designated for GPR payments, a premium percentage
will be determined to apply to all producers who meet the program
qualification requirements.
Good cause is shown to provide a shortened comment period because
the provisions of this rule are straight-forward, so a shortened
comment period still allows enough time for the public to provide
meaningful comments.
While the premium to purchase buy-up levels of coverage in the
Federal crop insurance program already receive substantial subsidies,
these subsidies are not tied to an individual producer's performance.
The good performance refund will provide a tool to encourage producers
to mitigate small losses.
Producers will soon be making decisions regarding the upcoming crop
year so knowing and understanding the benefits of this rule will allow
producers to take more timely actions to purchase the necessary buy-up
levels of coverage required for qualification for a good performance
refund, and to reduce or prevent small losses that could otherwise
jeopardize their future qualifications for such refund. To the extent
losses are mitigated or reduced in the Federal crop insurance program,
premium rates also may be lower, in turn reducing program costs to
producers, the government, and taxpayers.
A longer comment period, such as a 60 day period, would delay the
implementation of this rule and the payment of any refunds hereunder,
until well after the normal spring planting season for most 2011 crops.
By delaying these refunds, producers will not be able to use them to
help finance their 2011 spring operations. In addition, in the coming
weeks, producers will be making decisions regarding the upcoming crop
year so knowing and understanding the benefits of this rule will allow
producers to take more timely actions to purchase the necessary buy-up
levels of coverage required for qualification for a good performance
refund, and to reduce or prevent small losses that could otherwise
jeopardize their future qualifications for such refund. To the extent
losses are mitigated or reduced in the crop insurance program, premium
rates also may be lower, in turn reducing program costs to producers,
the government, and taxpayers.
The agency believes that requirements governing the payment of a
good performance refund are straight-forward. There are a limited
number of ways that such refunds can be provided within the context of
the Federal crop insurance program. Therefore, a lengthy delay of
implementation of the program is unnecessary and contrary to providing
the benefits to producers receiving these refunds in time for them to
be used to help finance their spring 2011 operations. For the reasons
stated above, good cause is shown to limit the comment period to 15
days for this rule as a lengthy comment period is not practicable and
would be contrary to the public interest.
The GPR is applicable to the 2011 and succeeding calendar years as
long as funds are available for GPR payments.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400
Administrative practice and procedure, Crop insurance.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation proposes to add a new
[[Page 720]]
subpart Y to 7 CFR part 400 to read as follows:
PART 400--GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
Subpart Y--Good-Performance Refunds
Sec.
400.800 Basis and applicability.
400.801 Definitions.
400.802 Eligibility requirements.
400.803 New or beginning producers.
400.804 Payments.
400.805 GPR announcements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(o).
Subpart Y--Good-Performance Refunds
Sec. 400.800 Basis and applicability.
(a) The regulations contained in this subpart describe the
eligibility requirements, rules, and criteria for receiving a Good-
Performance Refund (GPR).
(b) GPR payments will be made annually generally during the first
quarter of the calendar year, provided funds are available.
Sec. 400.801 Definitions.
Base period. A period of crop insurance program performance used to
determine an individual producer's net paid premium including the base
year and nine years prior to the base year. For example: If the base
year is 2009, the base period includes years 2000 through 2009.
Base year. The last crop year that has been completed and all
claims would normally have been paid. The base year is used to
establish the base period. For example: A payment for the 2011 calendar
year will be based on information containing the producer's crop
insurance experience with a base year of 2009 because claims for the
2010 crop year would not all have been finalized. For a 2012 calendar
year payment the base year would be 2010.
Buy-up coverage level. A level of coverage greater than
catastrophic risk protection. This level of insurance may also be
referred to as ``additional coverage.''
FCIC. Has the same meaning as contained in section 1 of the Common
Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (Basic Provisions) (7 CFR Sec.
457.8).
Net paid premium. For the base period, total premium for all crops
and units insured by the producer less the total premium subsidy and
any indemnities received. Indemnities will include all payments for all
claims except those designated as replant payments.
New or beginning producers. A producer who has not participated in
any farming or ranching operation, either as a primary entity or as a
person having a SBI in the operation, for any crop year prior to the
two crop years immediately preceding the base year. Example: New or
beginning producers for a GPR payment authorized for the 2011 crop year
could have been involved as a primary operator or a SBI in any farm or
ranch in 2007, 2008, and 2009 but could not have been a primary
operator or have a SBI in any farm or ranch for any crop year prior to
2007.
Percentage of net paid premium. A percentage determined by FCIC and
used to calculate the GPR, based on the total funds determined by FCIC
to be available for the GPR program and the total net paid premium of
all qualified producers. The percent of net paid premium will not
exceed 15 percent. (The percentage of net paid premium is adjusted to
account for the minimum and maximum allowable payments and new or
beginning producer payments.)
Positive net paid premium. When the net paid premium is greater
than one.
Substantial beneficial interest (SBI). Has the same meaning as
contained in section 1 of the Basic Provisions and any applicable
procedures.
Sec. 400.802 Eligibility requirements.
To be eligible for a GPR payment, a producer must:
(a) Have been a participant in any Federal crop insurance program
at the buy-up coverage level for at least one insurance policy that
earned premium for the base year.
(b) Not be determined to be ineligible in accordance with the Basic
Provisions or subpart U of this part, for the crop year subsequent to
the base year. For example, if the 2009 crop year is the base year, the
insured must not be determined to be ineligible for the 2010 crop year.
(c) Have used the same social security number or employer
identification number to identify the primary insured entity throughout
the base period.
(d) Meet the following good-performance requirements of:
(1) In the case of a producer with seven to ten years of program
participation during the base period:
(i) Not more than 1 year with a reported loss, and
(ii) Have a positive net paid premium for the program participation
period; or
(2) In the case of a program with four to six years of program
participation during the base period of having no years with a reported
loss.
Sec. 400.803 New or beginning producers.
(a) New or beginning producers will be eligible for a GPR payment
for any given year when GPR payments are made, unless FCIC publishes an
announcement, as specified in Sec. 400.805, stating otherwise.
(b) New or beginning producers must meet the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 400.802(a), (b), and (c).
(c) New or beginning producers will be required to sign a
certification statement that they meet the requirements to be
designated as a new or beginning producer in order to be eligible for a
GPR payment.
(d) New or beginning producers must demonstrate favorable program
performance by participating in the Federal crop insurance program for
the most recent one to three years of the base period, and have a
positive net paid premium for that period of participation.
Sec. 400.804 Payments.
(a) Aggregated premium and indemnity for all crops insured in all
counties under a qualifying producer's social security number or
employer identification number will be used to calculate the GPR.
(b) Except as provided herein, in the case of a new or beginning
producer, the net paid premium percentage will be reduced by 50 percent
of the percentage paid to producers who are not new or beginning. For
example: If the percent of net paid premium is 8 percent for producers
who are not new or beginning producers, then new and beginning
producers will receive a GPR of 4 percent of net paid premium, unless
an adjustment is needed due to a larger number of certifying new or
beginning producers than is anticipated.
(c) GPR payments under this section will not exceed $75 million. If
amounts to be paid exceed $75 million due to a larger than anticipated
number of producers that certify they are new or beginning, then FCIC
will adjust the percentage refund for new or beginning producers,
contained in paragraph (b) of this section, downward.
(d) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, GPR payments will be
calculated as follows:
(1) For producers, other than new or beginning producers, multiply
the percent of net paid premium by the individual producer's net paid
premium; and
(2) For new and beginning producers, multiply the percent of net
paid premium by .50, unless adjusted in accordance with paragraph (c)
of this section, and then multiply the result by the individual
producer's net paid premium.
(e) A GPR payment will:
[[Page 721]]
(1) Not be made unless it is at least $25; and
(2) Be capped at $25,000 for calculated GPR payments larger than
$25,000, regardless of the calculated payment.
(f) All GPR payments will be considered final with no adjustments,
modifications, additions or deletions, except as specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, and will be based on data
contained in the RMA crop insurance database as of the end of the first
full week in January of the year the GPR payment is authorized, unless
FCIC publishes an announcement in accordance with Sec. 400.805
providing a different date. For example: For GPR payments made for the
2011 calendar year, the data used would be as of the end of the first
full week in January 2011.
(g) Any qualifying producer involved in arbitration, litigation, or
mediation will not receive a payment until the legal proceedings have
been resolved.
(h) If a producer receives a GPR payment under this subpart and is
determined to be ineligible for the crop year subsequent to the base
year or is at any time determined to not meet the requirements of Sec.
400.803, the GPR payment must be repaid to FCIC in accordance with
section 24 of the Basic Provisions and any applicable procedures.
Sec. 400.805 GPR announcements.
FCIC will post information on the RMA Web site, at https://www.rma.usda.gov or a successor Web site, to provide the public with
information regarding the GPR for a calendar year.
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 3, 2011.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2011-14 Filed 1-4-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P