Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program, 744-751 [2010-33344]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
744
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(1) The manufacturer’s address and
contact information;
(2) A detailed explanation of the
purpose for the modification;
(3) A detailed description of the
modification, including a statement as
to whether the modification involves
adding or deleting a tobacco additive, or
increasing or decreasing the quantity of
an existing tobacco additive;
(4) A detailed explanation of why the
modification is a minor modification of
a tobacco product that can be sold under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act;
(5) A detailed explanation of why a
report under section 905(j)(1) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
intended to demonstrate substantial
equivalence is not necessary to ensure
that permitting the tobacco product to
be marketed would be appropriate for
protection of the public health;
(6) A certification (i.e., a signed
statement by a responsible official of the
company) summarizing the supporting
evidence and providing the rationale for
the official’s determination that the
modification does not increase the
tobacco product’s appeal to/use by
minors, toxicity, or addictiveness/abuse
liability; and
(7) Other information justifying an
exemption.
(c) Exemption determination. FDA
will review the information submitted
and determine whether to grant or deny
an exemption request based on whether
the criteria in section 905(j)(3) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
are met. FDA may request additional
information if necessary to make a
determination. FDA will consider the
exemption request withdrawn if the
information is not provided within the
requested timeframe.
(d) Rescission of an exemption. FDA
may rescind an exemption if it finds
that the exemption is not appropriate for
the protection of public health. In
general, FDA will rescind an exemption
only after notice and opportunity for a
hearing under 21 CFR part 16 of this
chapter is provided. However, FDA may
rescind an exemption prior to notice
and opportunity for a hearing under 21
CFR part 16 of this chapter if the
continuance of the exemption presents
a serious risk to public health. In that
case, FDA will provide the
manufacturer an opportunity for a
hearing as soon as possible after the
rescission.
Dated: January 3, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–34 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 230
RIN 0596–AC84
Community Forest and Open Space
Conservation Program
Forest Service, USDA.
Proposed rule, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Public comments are solicited
for this proposed rule which
implements the Community Forest and
Open Space Conservation Program
(CFP) authorized by Section 8003 of the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008. The CFP legislation is an
amendment to the Cooperative Forestry
Assistance Act of 1978. The CFP is a
competitive grant program whereby
local governments, Tribal Governments,
and qualified non-profit organizations
are eligible to apply for grants to
establish community forests. The
program’s two purposes are to assist
communities in acquiring forestland
that would provide public recreation,
environmental and economic benefits,
and forest-based educational programs,
and to protect forestland that has been
identified as a national, regional, or
local priority for protection. Existing
provisions in Forest Service regulations
pertaining to the Stewardship Incentive
Program will be removed as
deauthorized by the Farm Security and
Rural Investment Act of 2002, and this
proposed rule will be substituted in lieu
thereof.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by March 7, 2011 Pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act,
comments on the information collection
burden that would result from this
proposal must be received by March 7,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
concerning this notice should be
addressed to Community Forest
Program, U.S. Forest Service, State and
Private Forestry, Cooperative Forestry,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Code
1123, Washington, DC 20250.
Comments may also be sent via email to
communityforest@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to (202) 205–1271. All
comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at U.S.
Forest Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Code 1123, Washington,
DC 20250. Those wishing to inspect
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments are encouraged to call ahead
to (202) 205–1389 to facilitate entry to
the building.
Comments concerning the
information collection requirements
contained in this action should
reference OMB No. 0596–New, the
docket number, date, and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register.
Comments should be sent to the address
listed in the above paragraph.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maya Solomon, U.S. Forest Service,
State and Private Forestry, Cooperative
Forestry, (202) 205–1376. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Proposed
Rule
Congress authorized the Community
Forest and Open Space Conservation
Program (hereafter ‘‘CFP’’) to address the
needs of communities to protect and
maintain their forest resources. In the
CFP authorization, Congress found that
people derive health benefits from
having access to forests for recreation
and exercise. Congress also found that
forests protect public water supplies
and may provide financial benefits from
forest products. The CFP is a
competitive grant program whereby
local governments, Tribal Governments,
and qualified non-profit organizations
are eligible to apply for grants to
establish community forests through
fee-simple land acquisitions. ‘‘Feesimple’’ means full ownership and
acquisition of real property, versus a
partial interest such as conservation
easement. By creating community
forests through land acquisition,
communities and Tribes can sustainably
manage forests for these and many other
benefits, including wildlife habitat,
stewardship demonstration sites for
forest landowners, and environmental
education.
While the CFP title includes the term
‘‘open space,’’ the authorizing language
does not discuss the term. The only land
cover Congress references is ‘‘forests.’’
As a result, in this proposed rule, the
term ‘‘open space’’ is also not used, and
is assumed that the only type of ‘‘open
space’’ on which Congress wanted CFP
to focus is ‘‘forests.’’
The Forest Service believes that these
proposed regulations for CFP will
facilitate administration of the program
and provide uniform criteria for
program participation. The program will
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
focus its funding to forests that provide
community benefits as defined in this
proposed rule that are identified as a
national, regional, or local priority for
protection. See Ranking Criteria and
Proposal selection in § 230.5 of this
proposed rule. The Agency welcomes
comments on national, regional, and
local conservation priorities for
selection of proposals.
Tribal consultation was initiated on
October 20, 2010, and is currently
ongoing. No tribal input has been
received during the initial 60-day
period. Consultation will continue
during the 60-day public comment
period.
Complementary to Other Cooperative
Forestry Assistance Act Programs
The Cooperative Forestry Assistance
Act of 1978 (CFAA) enables the Forest
Service to work with States, private
landowners, and communities to
address the full range of forest resources
from urban street trees to large rural
timber lands. The design and delivery of
most Cooperative Forestry programs is
influenced by the priorities of State
resource agencies regarding urban,
suburban or rural forests.
The CFP recognizes that successful
protection of community forests
depends on engaged citizens. Their
participation is equal in importance to
the type of forests being protected. The
CFP complements and builds upon
other CFAA programs that focus on
stewardship and education by providing
the opportunity for some communities
to go a step further and directly acquire
and manage forests. Because the CFP
provides grant assistance directly to
Tribal Governments, local governments
or qualified nonprofit organizations, it is
able to assist those entities that have
demonstrated a sustained commitment
to community forestry. Through public
engagement, these communities are able
to articulate specific community needs
that this program can meet, and
demonstrate that they have the capacity
to manage a public asset such as a
community forest.
Benefits provided by forests acquired
under the CFP will need to be
quantified, and may address a variety of
outcomes such as protecting a
municipal water supply, providing
public access for outdoor recreation, or
providing economic benefits from
sustainable forest management,
including harvesting forest products and
using woody biomass for renewable
energy production. Beyond local
measures of success, the contribution of
community forests to larger protected
areas of forest and open space helps
support resource-based economies, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
adds needed resiliency to natural
systems as they respond to climate
change. Therefore, in addition to public
engagement to articulate local needs and
capacity, successful community forests
in the CFP will be part of a larger
landscape level context that will protect
many kinds of open spaces and working
lands that provide a variety of
ecosystem services. In this way, the
program delivers local benefits that can
also have a larger impact, since these
community forests will likely be part of
a larger conservation initiative.
Grant recipients will be required to
provide the Forest Service with a
Geographic Information System (GIS)
shapefile of CFP project tracts and cost
share tracts. The geospatial information
will reside at the National Information
Center for State and Private Forestry.
The areas protected through this
program will be able to be seen in map
and other formats on the Forest Service
website. These GIS shapefiles will allow
the Forest Service to spatially track CFP
program accomplishments and allow
the agency to calculate program
outcomes and public benefits provided
by the lands protected through CFP. The
Agency welcomes comments on
outcome measures for benefits provided
by forests acquired under the CFP.
Discussion of Specific Issues; Project
Review and Selection Process
Under CFP, applications will be
submitted to the State Forester or
equivalent Tribal Government official
who will, in turn, conduct a general
review of all applications for eligibility
and compatibility with landscape
conservation efforts. The proposed rule
does not allow submission of an
application for a project to both CFP and
the Forest Legacy Program
simultaneously. The State Forester or
equivalent Tribal Government official
may provide technical assistance to
applicants in the preparation of
applications and implementation of
grants.
The Forest Service proposes to
conduct a nationally competitive review
and ranking process to select projects
for funding. The application process is
outlined in § 230.3 of this proposed
rule. Individual applications will be
ranked according to criteria outlined in
§ 230.5 of this proposed rule. The Forest
Service anticipates providing additional
specificity on the review process,
review criteria, and timelines in an
annual request for proposals (RFP). The
Forest Service requests public comment
regarding the application process
outlined in § 230.3 and the ranking
criteria outlined in § 230.5 of this
proposed rule
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
745
The Forest Service wants to minimize
the amount of time between issuing the
RFP and funding the selected projects.
To achieve this goal, the Forest Service
anticipates issuing an RFP each year,
and selecting projects during the first
quarter of the following fiscal year
(October-December) subject to the
availability of funds. The proposed rule
requires the State Forester or equivalent
Tribal Government official to forward
all applications with recommendations
to the Forest Service. While the Forest
Service anticipates this intermediate
step will add approximately 30 days to
the review process, the Agency believes
that input from State Foresters and
Tribal Governments will be valuable in
helping the Forest Service make final
funding decisions.
Project Compliance With the National
Environmental Policy Act
Project grants are subject to National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
must comply with agency NEPA
implementing procedures as described
in 40 CFR 1500–1508 as well as the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
NEPA procedures at 40 CFR 1500–1508.
CFP grants are to be used for
transferring title and ownership of
private lands to third parties and will
not fund any ground-disturbing
activities. The Forest Service has
concluded that CFP grants fall under the
categorical exclusion provided in the
Forest Service’s NEPA procedures for
‘‘acquisition of land or interest in land’’
36 CFR 220.6(d)(6); 73 FR 43084 (July
24, 2008). As a result, CFP project grants
are excluded from documentation in an
environmental assessment or impact
statement. The applicability of the
categorical exclusion will be confirmed
through scoping and a review for
extraordinary circumstances.
Eligible Entities
The statute establishing CFP states
that only local governments, Tribal
Governments, and qualified nonprofit
organizations are eligible to receive a
grant through CFP. The statute also
provided definitions for those three
eligible organizations. Local
governments are defined as municipal,
county, and other local governments
with jurisdiction over local land use
decisions. Tribal Governments are
defined as those that are federally
recognized Tribes as prescribed by
section 4 of the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act (U.S.C. 450b). Finally,
qualified nonprofit organizations are
defined as charities under the Internal
Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) and
which also have a conservation purpose
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
746
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(26 U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)). A conservation
purpose is defined as the preservation of
land for outdoor recreation or
education, protection of natural habitat
or ecosystems, preservation of open
space, and preservation of historic lands
or structures. Consistent with
regulations of the Internal Revenue
Service (26 CFR 1.170A–14(c)(1))
qualified non-profit organizations must
also have a commitment to protect in
perpetuity, the purposes for which the
tract was acquired under the CFP and
demonstrate that they have the
resources to enforce the protection of
the property as a community forest. In
general, a land conservancy or land trust
is the type of organization that would be
considered a qualified nonprofit
organization under the authorizing
statute of the CFP.
Ensuring Permanence of Community
Forest Projects
In order to minimize the chances that
the property is ever sold, or converted
to non-forest uses, the following four
actions will be required of the grant
recipient:
(1) Grant recipients will be required to
record a Notice of Grant Requirements
with the deed in the lands records of the
local county or municipality.
(2) Grant recipients will define
objectives for the use and management
of the community forest in the required
Community Forest Plan. Because the
size, condition, and possible uses of
community forests under this program
could be quite varied, the Community
Forest Plan will identify forest uses for
the property. In order to guide
compliance with the requirements of the
CFP, ‘‘non-forest uses’’ is defined in
§ 230.2 of this proposed rule.
(3) Every ten years, grant recipients
will submit to the Forest Service a selfcertifying statement that the property
has not been sold or converted to nonforest uses.
(4) Grant recipients will be subject to
a spot check conducted by the Forest
Service to verify that property acquired
under the CFP has not been sold or
converted to non-forest uses (§ 230.2).
In the statute establishing the CFP,
Congress required that the grant
recipient cannot sell the land or convert
it to non-forest uses (Sec. 8003.e). In the
event that these conditions are violated,
the law requires that the grant recipient
pay the Federal Government an amount
equal to the greater of the current sale
price or current appraised value of the
land. An additional penalty is that the
grant recipient that sells or converts a
parcel acquired under the CFP will not
be allowed to receive additional grants
under the program. Ramifications for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
conversion to non-forest use or sale is
discussed in § 230.9 ‘‘Ownership Use
and Requirements’’ of this proposed
rule.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition for Federal
and Federally-Assisted Programs
The Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policy
Act of 1970 (‘‘Uniform Act’’) (42 U.S.C.
4601, et. seq.) provides guidance and
procedures for the acquisition of real
property by the Federal government,
including relocation benefits to
displaced persons. Department of
Transportation regulations
implementing the Uniform Act (49 CFR
24) have been adopted by the
Department of Agriculture (7 CFR 21).
However, CFP is deemed exempt from
the Uniform Act because it meets the
exemption criteria stated at 49 CFR
24.101(b)(1).
Federal Appraisal Standards
Section 7A(c)(4) of the Cooperative
Forestry Assistance Act (16 U.S.C.
2103d(c)(4)), requires that land acquired
under CFP be appraised in accordance
with the Uniform Appraisal Standards
for Federal Land Acquisitions (Federal
Appraisal Standards) in order to
determine the non-Federal share of the
cost of a parcel of privately-owned
forest land. The Federal Appraisal
Standards are contained in a readily
available public document, which is
well known to professional appraisers
(see: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Legal_Documents.html). A grant
recipient will be responsible for
assuring that the appraisal of the CFP
tract is done in conformance with the
Federal Appraisal Standards. The
Federal Appraisal Standards will be
used to determine reimbursement for
the non-Federal cost share. However,
separate tracts donated for the purpose
of providing the non-Federal cost share
may be appraised using the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP) or the IRS regulations
for a donation in land. The Forest
Service will be available to assist
applicants with the appraisal and
associated appraisal review, and will
conduct spot checks to assure
compliance with Federal Appraisal
Standards.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under USDA procedures and Executive
Order 12866. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has determined that
this proposed rule is significant for
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
purposes of Executive Order 12866. A
Cost Benefit Analysis has been
completed and has determined that the
benefits for each established forests will
vary, depending on characteristics of the
forest land, the community, and the
management objectives developed with
public input in the establishment of the
required community forest plan. Where
these forests are located will also be
dependent on the communities that
support them, therefore, they could
occur in communities from the very
rural to decidedly urban. Since there
will be diversity among forests and their
benefits, this analysis uses qualitative as
well as quantitative methods to describe
the potential benefits and costs of CFP.
The primary cost of CFP is the
acquisition of the land itself. The
transfer of lands from private property
may reduce the tax base, or result in
forgone economic benefits fostered by
development. This analysis assumes
that development and associated
activity is established elsewhere
without resulting in forestland
conservation and the opportunity cost of
lower economic activity is off-set by the
benefits provided by the community
forest, such that the main costs become
the cost of the acquisition and the tax
revenue foregone by the local
government unit. These costs are
compared with the benefits of protecting
forest land, which are largely
intangibles, such as environmental
goods and services from the land and
non-market valued amenities, such as
open spaces and scenic views, but also
includes the economic value of
retaining and active working forest in
the local economy. Qualitative and
quantitative evidence supports the
assertion that community forests
provide many benefits to communities,
especially in areas threatened by
conversion of private forest land.
This proposed rule will not have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy nor adversely affect
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety,
nor adversely affect State or local
governments. This proposed rule will
not interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency nor raise
new legal or policy issues. Finally, this
proposed rule will not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients of
such programs.
This proposed rule does not regulate
the private use of land or the conduct
of business. It is a grant program to local
governments, Tribal Government and
qualified nonprofit organizations for
purposes of acquiring land for resource
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
conservation and open space
preservation. By providing funding to
eligible entities for land acquisition, the
Federal Government will promote the
non-monetary benefits of sustainable
forest management. These benefits
include: improved water quality,
wildlife and fish habitat, forest based
educational programs including
vocational education programs in
forestry, replicable models of effective
forest stewardship for private
landowners, open space preservation,
carbon sequestration, and enhanced
recreational opportunities including
hunting and fishing.
The acquisition of land by eligible
entities may affect the local real
property tax base, depending on
applicable state law and the tax status
of the acquiring entity. The possible
impact on the real property tax base is
not possible to ascertain, but is assumed
that any land going from taxable to nontaxable status would cause a
commensurate shifting of the tax burden
to other taxable properties or,
alternatively, a reduction in local tax
revenues.
As a new program, CFP would not
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, user fees, loan programs,
or the rights and obligations of program
participants. The program is voluntary
for each participating eligible entity.
Proper Consideration of Small Entities
This proposed rule has been
considered in light of Executive order
13272 regarding property considerations
of small entities and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996. The proposed rule for voluntary
participation in the CFP does not
impose significant direct costs on small
entities. This proposed rule imposes no
additional requirements on the affected
public. Entities most likely affected by
this proposed rule are the local
governments, qualified nonprofit
organizations, and Tribal governments
eligible to receive a grant through CFP.
The minimum requirements on small
entities imposed by this proposed rule
are necessary to protect the public
interest, not administratively
burdensome or costly to meet, and are
within the capabilities of small entities
to perform. The proposed rule would
not materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, user fees, loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of program participants. It does not
compel the expenditure of $100 million
or more by any State, local or Indian
Tribal government, or anyone in the
private sector. Under these
circumstances, the Forest Service has
determined that this action would not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538), which the President signed
into law on March 22, 1995, the Agency
has assessed the effects of this proposed
rule on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This proposed rule does not compel the
expenditure of $100 million or more by
any State, local or Indian Tribal
governments, or anyone in the private
sector. Therefore, a statement under
section 202 of that Act is not required.
Federalism
The Forest Service has considered
this rule under the requirements of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and
Executive Order 12875, Government
Partnerships. The Forest Service has
determined that the rule conforms with
the federalism principles set out in
these Executive Orders. The rule would
not impose any compliance costs on the
States other than those imposed by
statute, and would not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Based on
comments received on this proposed
rule, the Agency will consider if any
additional consultations will be needed
with the State and local governments
prior to adopting a final rule.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35], the Forest Service is
requesting an approval of a new
information collection.
Title: Proposed substitution of 36 CFR
part 230, Subpart A with Community
Forest and Open Space Conservation
Program.
OMB Number: 0596–New.
Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years
from approval date.
Type of Request: New information
collection.
Abstract: The purpose of CFP is to
achieve community benefits through
grants to local governments, Tribal
Governments, and qualified nonprofit
organizations to establish community
forests by acquiring and protecting
private forestlands. This proposed rule
includes information requirements
necessary to implement CFP and
comply with grants regulations and
OMB Circulars. The information
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
747
requirements will be used to help the
Forest Service in the following areas:
(1) To determine that the applicant is
eligible to receive funds under the
program,
(2) To determine if the proposal meets
the qualifications in the law and
regulations,
(3) To evaluate and rank the proposals
based on a standard, consistent
information, and
(4) To determine if the projects costs
are allowable, and sufficient cost share
is provided.
Local governmental entities, Tribal
Governments, and qualified nonprofit
organizations are the only entities
eligible for the program, and therefore
are the only organizations from which
information will be collected.
The information collection required
for a request for proposals and grant
application, is approved and assigned
Office of Management and Budget
Control (OMB) No. 0596–New. The
information collection required for a
proposed bonded notice in this
proposed rule has been submitted to
OMB as a new collection.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
180.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 180.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 5,800 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Consultations and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule has tribal
implications as defined in Executive
Order 13175. Section 7A(a)(1) of the
Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act
establishes that Federally recognized
Indian tribes are eligible entities to
participate in the CFP. In accordance
with the President’s memorandum of
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
748
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
April 29, 1994, ‘‘Government-toGovernment Relations with Native
American Tribal Governments’’ (59 FR
22951); the Executive Order of
November 6, 2000, ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (EO 13175); and with the
directives of the Department of
Agriculture (DR1350–001); we have
determined that specific effects on
Indian tribes are likely to occur through
implementation of the CFP and,
therefore, the opportunity for
government-to-government consultation
will be provided. Tribal consultation
will be accomplished through local and
regional consultation processes in
coordination with the Washington
Office of the Forest Service.
Tribal consultation was initiated on
October 20, 2010, and is currently
ongoing. No Tribal input has been
received during the initial 60-day
period. Consultation will continue
during the 60-day public comment
period.
No Takings Implementations
This proposed rule has been analyzed
in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
12630, and it has been determined that
the proposed rule does not pose the risk
of a taking of constitutionally protected
private property. This proposed rule
implements a program to assist eligible
entities to acquire land from willing
landowners. Any land use restrictions
are voluntarily undertaken by program
participants.
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Environmental Impact
The Forest Service has determined
that this proposed rule falls under the
categorical exclusion provided in Forest
Service regulations on National
Environmental Policy Act procedures.
Such procedures exclude from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ‘‘rules,
regulations, or policies to establish
service wide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions.’’ 36
CFR 220.6(d)(2); 73 FR 43084 (July 24,
2008). This proposed rule outlines the
programmatic implementation of CFP,
and as such, has no direct effect on
Forest Service decisions for land
management activities.
Energy Effects
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 13211 of May 18,
2001, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. It has been
determined that this proposed rule does
not constitute a significant energy action
as defined in the Executive Order.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. The Forest Service has
not identified any State or local laws or
regulations that are in conflict with this
proposed rule or that would impede full
implementation of this proposed rule.
Nevertheless, in the event that such a
conflict was to be identified, the
proposed rule would preempt the State
or local laws or regulations found to be
in conflict. However, in that case, no
retroactive effect would be given to this
rule, and the Forest Service would not
require the use of administrative
proceedings before parties could file
suit in court challenging its provisions.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 230
Grant programs, Grants
administration, State and local
governments, Tribal governments,
Nonprofit organizations, Conservation,
Forests and forest products, Land sales.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in
the preamble, the Forest Service
proposes to amend part 230 of Title 36
of the Code of Federal Regulations by
revising subpart A to read as follows:
PART 230—STATE AND PRIVATE
FORESTRY ASSISTANCE
1. The authority citation for part 230
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 2103(d) & 2109(e).
2. Revise Subpart A to read as follows.
Subpart A—Community Forest and Open
Space Conservation Program
Sec.
230.1 Purpose and scope.
230.2 Definitions.
230.3 Application process.
230.4 Application requirements.
230.5 Ranking criteria and proposal
selection.
230.6 Project costs and cost share
requirements.
230.7 Grant requirements.
230.8 Acquisition requirements.
230.9 Ownership and use requirements.
230.10 Technical assistance funds.
Subpart A—Community Forest and
Open Space Conservation Program
§ 230.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) The regulations of this subpart
govern the rules and procedures for the
Community Forest and Open Space
Conservation Program (CFP),
established under Section 7A of the
Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of
1978 (16 U.S.C. 2103d). Under CFP, the
Secretary of Agriculture, acting through
the Chief of the Forest Service, awards
grants to local governments, Tribal
Governments, and qualified nonprofit
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
organizations to establish community
forests for community benefits by
acquiring and protecting private
forestlands.
(b) The CFP applies to eligible entities
within any of the 50 States, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the
United States, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated
States of Micronesia, the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, the Republic of Palau,
and the territories and possessions of
the United States.
§ 230.2
Definitions.
The terms used in this subpart are
defined as follows:
Community benefits. One or more of
the following:
(1) Economic benefits such as timber
and non-timber products resulting from
sustainable forest management and
tourism;
(2) Environmental benefits, including
clean water, stormwater management,
and wildlife habitat;
(3) Benefits from forest-based
educational programs, including
vocational education programs in
forestry;
(4) Benefits from serving as replicable
models of effective forest stewardship
for private landowners;
(5) Recreational benefits, such as
hiking, hunting and fishing; and
(6) Public access.
Community forest. Forest land owned
in fee simple by an eligible entity that
provides public access and is managed
to provide community benefits pursuant
to a community forest plan.
Community forest plan. A tractspecific plan that guides the
management and use of this community
forest, developed with community
involvement, and includes the following
components:
(1) A description of the property,
including acreage and county location,
land use, forest type and vegetation
cover;
(2) Objectives for the community
forest;
(3) Community benefits to be
achieved from the establishment of the
community forest;
(4) Mechanisms promoting
community involvement in the
development and implementation of the
community forest plan;
(5) Implementation strategies for
achieving community forest plan
objectives;
(6) Plans for the utilization or
demolition of existing structures and
proposed needs for further
improvements; and,
(7) Long-term use and management of
the property.
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Eligible entity. A local governmental
entity, Tribal Government, or a qualified
nonprofit organization that is qualified
to acquire and manage land.
Eligible lands. Private forest lands
that:
(1) Are threatened by conversion to
nonforest uses;
(2) Are not lands held in trust by the
United States on behalf of any Tribal
Government or allotment lands; and,
(3) If acquired by an eligible entity,
can provide defined community benefits
under CFP and allow public access.
Equivalent tribal government official.
An individual designated and
authorized by the Tribal Government.
Federal appraisal standards. The
Uniform Appraisal Standards for
Federal Land Acquisitions developed by
the Interagency Land Acquisition
Conference.
Forest lands. Lands that are at least
five acres in size, suitable to sustain
natural vegetation, and at least 75
percent forested.
Grant recipient: An eligible entity that
receives a grant from the U.S. Forest
Service through the CFP.
Landscape conservation initiative. A
landscape-level conservation or
management plan or activity that
identifies conservation needs and goals
of a locality, state, or region.
Conservation goals identified need to
correspond with the community and
environmental benefits outlined for the
CFP.
Local governmental entity. Any
municipal government, county
government, or other local government
body with jurisdiction over local land
use decisions as defined by Federal or
State law.
Non-forest uses. Activities that
threaten forest cover and are
inconsistent with the Community Forest
Plan, and include the following:
(1) Subdivision;
(2) Residential development, except
for a caretaker building;
(3) Mining and nonrenewable
resource extraction, except for activities
that would not require surface
disturbance of the community forest
such as directional drilling for oil and
gas development;
(4) Industrial use, including the
manufacturing of products;
(5) Commercial use, except for
sustainable timber or other renewable
resources, and limited compatible
commercial activities to support
cultural, recreational and educational
use of the community forest by the
public; and
(6) Structures and facilities, except for
compatible recreational facilities,
concession and educational kiosks,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
energy development for onsite use and
parking areas. Said structures, facilities
and parking areas must have minimal
impacts to forest and water resources.
Qualified nonprofit organization.
Defined by the CFP authorizing statute
(Public Law 110–234; 122 Stat. at 1281),
an organization that is described in
section 170(h)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C.
170(h)(3)) and operates in accordance
with one or more of the conservation
purposes specified in section
170(h)(4)(A) of that Code (26 U.S.C.
170(h)(4)(A)). For the purposes of CFP,
a qualified nonprofit organization must
meet the following requirements:
(1) Consistent with regulations of the
Internal Revenue Service at 26 CFR
1.170A–14(c)(1):
(i) Have a commitment to protect in
perpetuity the purposes for which the
tract was acquired under the CFP; and
(ii) Demonstrate that it has the
resources to enforce the protection of
the property as a community forest as a
condition of acquiring a tract under the
CFP.
(2) Operate primarily or substantially
in accordance with one or more of the
conservation purposes specified in
section 170(h)(4)(A) of I.R.S. code (26
U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)). Conservation
purposes include:
(i) The preservation of land areas for
outdoor recreation by, or the education
of, the general public,
(ii) The protection of a relatively
natural habitat of fish, wildlife, or
plants, or similar ecosystem,
(iii) The preservation of open space
(including farmland and forest land)
where such preservation is for the
scenic enjoyment of the general public,
or pursuant to a clearly delineated
Federal, State, or local governmental
conservation policy, and will yield a
significant public benefit, or
(iv) The preservation of a historically
important land area or a certified
historic structure.
Public access. Access that is provided
on a non-discriminatory basis at
reasonable times and places, but may be
limited by actions protecting resources
or public health and safety.
State forester. The State employee
who is responsible for administration
and delivery of forestry assistance
within a State.
Tribal government. Defined by section
4 of the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.
450b).
§ 230.3
Application process.
(a) The Forest Service will issue a
national request for proposals (RFP) for
grants under the CFP. The RFP will
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
749
include the following information
outlined in this proposed rule:
(1) The process for submitting an
application;
(2) Application requirements
(§ 230.4);
(3) Review process and criteria that
will be used by the Forest Service, the
State Forester, and equivalent Tribal
Government official (§ 230.5); and
(4) Other conditions determined
appropriate by the Forest Service.
(b) Pursuant to the RFP, interested
eligible entities will submit an
application for program participation to:
(1) The State Forester, for applications
by local governments and qualified
nonprofit organizations, or
(2) The equivalent Tribal Government
official, for applications submitted by a
Tribal Government.
(c) The State Forester or equivalent
Tribal Government official will review
all applications and assess:
(1) That the applicant is an eligible
entity;
(2) That the land is eligible; and
(3) Whether the project contributes to
a landscape conservation initiative.
(d) In accordance with the RFP, the
State Forester or equivalent Tribal
Government official will forward all
applications to the Forest Service, and
(1) Provide an assessment of each
application, and
(2) Describe what technical assistance
they may render in support of
applications and an estimate of needed
financial assistance (§ 230.10).
(e) A proposed application cannot be
submitted for funding consideration
simultaneously for both CFP and the
Forest Service’s Forest Legacy Program
(16 U.S.C. 2103c).
§ 230.4
Application requirements.
The following section outlines
minimum application requirements, but
the RFP may include additional
requirements.
(a) Documentation verifying that the
applicant is an eligible entity and that
the proposed acquisition is of eligible
land that contains forest land.
(b) Applications must include the
following regarding the property
proposed for acquisition:
(1) A description of the property,
including acreage and county location;
(2) A description of current land uses,
including improvements;
(3) A description of forest type and
vegetative cover;
(4) A map of sufficient scale to show
the location of the property in relation
to roads and other improvements as
well as parks, refuges, or other protected
lands in the vicinity;
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
750
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(5) A description of applicable zoning
and other land use regulations affecting
the property;
(6) Relationship of the property
within and its contributions to a
landscape conservation initiative; and
(7) A description of any threats of
conversion to nonforest uses.
(c) Information regarding the
proposed establishment of a community
forest, including:
(1) A description of the benefiting
community, including demographics,
and the associated benefits provided by
the proposed land acquisition;
(2) A description of the community
involvement in the planning and longterm management of the community
forest;
(3) An identification of persons and
organizations that support the project
and their specific role in acquiring the
land and establishing and managing the
community forest; and
(4) A draft Community Forest Plan.
The eligible entity is encouraged to
work with the State Forester or
equivalent Tribal Government official
for technical assistance when
developing or updating the Community
Forest Plan.
(d) Information regarding the
proposed land acquisition, including:
(1) A proposed project budget
(§ 230.6);
(2) The status of due diligence,
including signed option or purchase and
sale agreement, title search, minerals
determination, and appraisal;
(3) Description and status of cost
share (secure, pending, commitment
letter, etc.) (§ 230.6);
(4) The status of negotiations with
participating landowner(s) including
purchase options, contracts, and other
terms and conditions of sale;
(5) The proposed timeline for
completing the acquisition and
establishing the community forest; and
(6) Long term management costs and
funding source(s).
(e) Applications must comply with
the Uniform Federal Assistance
Regulations (7 CFR 3015).
(f) Applications must also include the
forms required to process a Federal
grant. Section 230.7 references the grant
forms that must be included in the
application and the specific
administrative requirements that apply
to the type of Federal grant used for this
program.
§ 230.5 Ranking criteria and proposal
selection.
(a) Using the criteria described below,
to the extent practicable, the Forest
Service will give priority to:
(1) An application that maximizes the
delivery of community benefits, as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
defined in this proposed rule, through a
high degree of public participation; and
(2) An application with a subject
property that makes a substantial
contribution to a landscape
conservation initiative. A landscape
conservation initiative, as defined in
this proposed rule, is a landscape-level
conservation or management plan or
activity that identifies conservation
needs and goals of a locality, state, or
region.
(b) The Forest Service will evaluate
applications received by the State
Foresters and equivalent Tribal
Government officials and award grants
based on the following criteria:
(1) Type and extent of community
benefits provided. Community benefits
are defined in this proposed rule as:
(i) Economic benefits such as timber
and non-timber products resulting from
sustainable forest management and
tourism;
(ii) Environmental benefits, including
clean water, stormwater management,
and wildlife habitat;
(iii) Benefits from forest-based
educational programs, including
vocational education programs in
forestry;
(iv) Benefits from serving as replicable
models of effective forest stewardship
for private landowners;
(v) Recreational benefits, such as
hiking, hunting and fishing; and
(vi) Public access.
(2) Extent and nature of community
engagement in the establishment and
long-term management of the
community forest;
(3) Amount of cost share leveraged;
(4) Extent to which the community
forest contributes to a landscape
conservation initiative;
(5) Extent of due diligence completed
on the project, including cost share
committed and status of appraisal;
(6) Likelihood that, unprotected, the
property would be converted to nonforest uses;
(7) Costs to the Federal government;
and
(8) Additional considerations as may
be outlined in the RFP.
§ 230.6 Project costs and cost share
requirements.
(a) The CFP Federal contribution
cannot exceed 50 percent of the total
project costs.
(b) Allowable project and cost share
costs will include the purchase price
and the following transactional costs
associated with the acquisition:
Appraisals and appraisal reviews, land
surveys, legal and closing costs,
development of the community forest
plan, and title examination. The
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
following principles and procedures
will determine allowable costs for
grants:
(1) For local and Tribal governments,
refer to OMB Circular A–87 (Cost
Principles for State, Local and Indian
Tribal Governments).
(2) For nonprofit organizations, refer
to OMB Circular A–122 (Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations).
(c) Project costs do not include the
following:
(1) Long-term operations,
maintenance, and management of the
land;
(2) Construction of buildings or
recreational facilities;
(3) Research;
(4) Existing liens or taxes owed; and
(5) Costs associated with preparation
of the application, except for appraisals
and the community forest plan.
(d) Cost share contributions can
include cash, in-kind services, or
donations and must meet the following
requirements:
(1) Be supported by grant regulations
described above;
(2) Not include other federal funds
unless specifically authorized by
Federal statute;
(3) Not include non-federal funds
used as cost share for other federal
programs;
(4) Not include funds used to satisfy
mandatory or compensatory mitigation
requirements under a Federal
regulation, such as Clean Water Act,
River and Harbor Act, or Endangered
Species Act;
(5) Not include borrowed funds; and
(6) Must be accomplished within the
grant period.
(e) Cost share contributions may
include the purchase or donation of
lands located within the community
forest as long as it is provided by an
eligible entity and legally dedicated to
perpetual land conservation consistent
with CFP program objectives.
(f) For the purposes of calculating the
cost share contribution, the grant
recipient may request the inclusion of
project due diligence costs such as title
review and appraisals that incurred
prior to issuance of the grant. These preaward costs may occur up to one year
prior to the issuance of the grant, but
cannot include the purchase of CFP
land, including cost share tracts.
§ 230.7
Grant requirements.
(a) The following grant forms and
supporting materials must be included
in the application:
(1) An Application for Federal
Assistance (Standard Form 424);
(2) Budget information (Standard
Form SF 424c—Construction Programs);
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
erowe on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(3) Assurances of compliance with all
applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and policies (Standard Form 424d—
Construction Programs); and
(4) Additional forms as may be
required.
(b) Once an application is selected,
funding will be obligated to the grant
recipient through a grant.
(c) The initial grant period will be two
years, and acquisition of lands should
occur within that timeframe. The grant
may be reasonably extended by the
Forest Service for an additional 12
months when necessary to
accommodate unforeseen circumstances
in the land acquisition process.
(d) The grant paperwork must adhere
to grant requirements listed below.
(1) Local and Tribal governments
should refer to OMB Circular A–102
(Grants and Cooperative Agreements
with State and Local Governments) and
7 CFR 3016 (Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments) for directions.
(2) Nonprofit organizations should
refer to OMB Circular A–110 (Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Other Agreements with Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals and
Other Nonprofit Organizations) and 7
CFR 3019 (Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations) for directions.
(e) Forest Service must approve any
amendment to a proposal or request to
reallocate funding within a grant
proposal. If negotiations on a selected
project fail, the applicant cannot
substitute an alternative site.
(f) The grant recipient must comply
with the requirements in § 230.8 before
funds will be released.
(g) After the project has closed, as a
requirement of the grant, grant
recipients will be required to provide
the Forest Service with a Geographic
Information System (GIS) shapefile of
CFP project tracts and cost share tracts.
(h) Any funds not expended within
the grant period must be de-obligated
and revert to the Forest Service for
redistribution through CFP process.
(i) All media, press, signage, and other
documents discussing the creation of
the community forest must reference the
partnership and financial assistance by
the Forest Service through CFP.
§ 230.8
Acquisition requirements.
(a) Grant recipients participating in
CFP must complete the following,
which applies to all tracts, including
cost share tracts:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:32 Jan 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
(1) Complete an appraisal.
(i) For lands purchased with CFP
funds, the appraisal must comply with
Federal Appraisal Standards prior to the
release of the grant funds. The grant
recipient must provide documentation
that the appraisal and associated
appraisal review were conducted in a
manner consistent with the Federal
appraisal standards.
(ii) For donated cost share tracts, the
market value must be determined by an
independent appraiser. The value needs
to be documented by a responsible
official of the party to which the
property is donated.
(2) Prior to closing, notify the
landowner in writing of the appraised
value of the property and that the sale
is voluntary. If the grant recipient has a
voluntary option for less than appraised
value, they do not have to renegotiate
the agreement.
(3) Purchase all surface and
subsurface mineral rights, whenever
possible. However, if severed mineral
rights cannot be obtained, then the grant
recipient must follow the retention of
qualified mineral interest requirements
outlined in the Internal Revenue Service
regulations (26 CFR 1.170A–14 (g)(4)),
which address both surface and
subsurface minerals.
(4) Ensure that title to lands acquired
conforms with title standards applicable
to state land acquisitions where the land
is located.
(i) Title to lands acquired using CFP
funds must not be subject to outstanding
or reserved property rights or future
interests the reasonable exercise of
which would be contrary to the
purposes for which the land was
acquired.
(ii) Whenever possible, title insurance
must be secured for the full value of the
land, with the United States named as
an additional insured on the policy.
(iii) Title insurance must not be a
substitute for acceptable title.
(5) Record with the deed in the lands
record of the local county or
municipality, a Notice of Grant
Requirement, which includes the
following:
(i) States that the property (including
cost share tracts) was purchased with
CFP funds;
(ii) Provides a legal description;
(iii) Identifies the name and address
of the grant recipient who is the
authorized title holder;
(iv) States the purpose of the CFP;
(v) References the Grant Agreement
with the Forest Service (title and
agreement number) and the address
where it is kept on file;
(vi) States that the grant recipient
confirms its obligation to manage the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
751
interest in real property pursuant to the
grant, the Community Forest Plan, and
the purpose of the CFP;
(vii) States that the grant recipient
will not convey or encumber the interest
in real property, in whole or in part, to
another party; and
(viii) States that the grant recipient
will manage the interest in real property
consistent with the purpose of the CFP.
§ 230.09
Ownership and use requirements.
(a) Complete the final Community
Forest Plan within 120 days of the land
acquisition, and must be updated
periodically, but at least every ten years.
(b) Provide appropriate public access.
(c) In the event that a grant recipient
sells or converts to nonforest use, a
parcel of land acquired under CFP, the
grant recipient must:
(1) Pay the United States an amount
equal to the current sale price or the
current appraised value of the parcel,
whichever is greater; and
(2) Not be eligible for additional
grants under CFP.
(d) For Tribal Governments, land
acquired using a grant provided under
CFP must not be sold, converted to nonforest uses, or converted to land held in
trust by the United States on behalf of
any Tribal Government.
(e) Every ten years, the grant
recipients will submit to the Forest
Service an updated Community Forest
Plan and a self-certifying statement that
the property has not been sold or
converted to non-forest uses.
(f) Grant recipients will be subject to
a spot check conducted by the Forest
Service to verify that property acquired
under the CFP has not been sold or
converted to non-forest uses.
§ 230.10
Technical assistance funds.
CFP technical assistance funds will be
provided to State Foresters and
equivalent Tribal Government officials
through an administrative grant to help
implement community forest projects
funded through CFP, and as a result,
funds will only be provided to States or
Tribal Government with a CFP project
funded within their jurisdiction. Section
7A (f) of the authorizing statute limits
the funds made available for program
administration and technical assistance
to not more than 10% of all funds made
available to carry out the program for
each fiscal year.
Dated: December 30, 2010.
Jay Jensen,
Deputy Under Secretary, NRE.
[FR Doc. 2010–33344 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
E:\FR\FM\06JAP1.SGM
06JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 744-751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33344]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 230
RIN 0596-AC84
Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Public comments are solicited for this proposed rule which
implements the Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program
(CFP) authorized by Section 8003 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy
Act of 2008. The CFP legislation is an amendment to the Cooperative
Forestry Assistance Act of 1978. The CFP is a competitive grant program
whereby local governments, Tribal Governments, and qualified non-profit
organizations are eligible to apply for grants to establish community
forests. The program's two purposes are to assist communities in
acquiring forestland that would provide public recreation,
environmental and economic benefits, and forest-based educational
programs, and to protect forestland that has been identified as a
national, regional, or local priority for protection. Existing
provisions in Forest Service regulations pertaining to the Stewardship
Incentive Program will be removed as deauthorized by the Farm Security
and Rural Investment Act of 2002, and this proposed rule will be
substituted in lieu thereof.
DATES: Comments must be received in writing by March 7, 2011 Pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on the information collection
burden that would result from this proposal must be received by March
7, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Written comments concerning this notice should be addressed
to Community Forest Program, U.S. Forest Service, State and Private
Forestry, Cooperative Forestry, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Code
1123, Washington, DC 20250. Comments may also be sent via email to
communityforest@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to (202) 205-1271. All
comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public inspection and copying. The
public may inspect comments received at U.S. Forest Service, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Code 1123, Washington, DC 20250. Those
wishing to inspect comments are encouraged to call ahead to (202) 205-
1389 to facilitate entry to the building.
Comments concerning the information collection requirements
contained in this action should reference OMB No. 0596-New, the docket
number, date, and page number of this issue of the Federal Register.
Comments should be sent to the address listed in the above paragraph.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Solomon, U.S. Forest Service,
State and Private Forestry, Cooperative Forestry, (202) 205-1376.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Proposed Rule
Congress authorized the Community Forest and Open Space
Conservation Program (hereafter ``CFP'') to address the needs of
communities to protect and maintain their forest resources. In the CFP
authorization, Congress found that people derive health benefits from
having access to forests for recreation and exercise. Congress also
found that forests protect public water supplies and may provide
financial benefits from forest products. The CFP is a competitive grant
program whereby local governments, Tribal Governments, and qualified
non-profit organizations are eligible to apply for grants to establish
community forests through fee-simple land acquisitions. ``Fee-simple''
means full ownership and acquisition of real property, versus a partial
interest such as conservation easement. By creating community forests
through land acquisition, communities and Tribes can sustainably manage
forests for these and many other benefits, including wildlife habitat,
stewardship demonstration sites for forest landowners, and
environmental education.
While the CFP title includes the term ``open space,'' the
authorizing language does not discuss the term. The only land cover
Congress references is ``forests.'' As a result, in this proposed rule,
the term ``open space'' is also not used, and is assumed that the only
type of ``open space'' on which Congress wanted CFP to focus is
``forests.''
The Forest Service believes that these proposed regulations for CFP
will facilitate administration of the program and provide uniform
criteria for program participation. The program will
[[Page 745]]
focus its funding to forests that provide community benefits as defined
in this proposed rule that are identified as a national, regional, or
local priority for protection. See Ranking Criteria and Proposal
selection in Sec. 230.5 of this proposed rule. The Agency welcomes
comments on national, regional, and local conservation priorities for
selection of proposals.
Tribal consultation was initiated on October 20, 2010, and is
currently ongoing. No tribal input has been received during the initial
60-day period. Consultation will continue during the 60-day public
comment period.
Complementary to Other Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act Programs
The Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 (CFAA) enables the
Forest Service to work with States, private landowners, and communities
to address the full range of forest resources from urban street trees
to large rural timber lands. The design and delivery of most
Cooperative Forestry programs is influenced by the priorities of State
resource agencies regarding urban, suburban or rural forests.
The CFP recognizes that successful protection of community forests
depends on engaged citizens. Their participation is equal in importance
to the type of forests being protected. The CFP complements and builds
upon other CFAA programs that focus on stewardship and education by
providing the opportunity for some communities to go a step further and
directly acquire and manage forests. Because the CFP provides grant
assistance directly to Tribal Governments, local governments or
qualified nonprofit organizations, it is able to assist those entities
that have demonstrated a sustained commitment to community forestry.
Through public engagement, these communities are able to articulate
specific community needs that this program can meet, and demonstrate
that they have the capacity to manage a public asset such as a
community forest.
Benefits provided by forests acquired under the CFP will need to be
quantified, and may address a variety of outcomes such as protecting a
municipal water supply, providing public access for outdoor recreation,
or providing economic benefits from sustainable forest management,
including harvesting forest products and using woody biomass for
renewable energy production. Beyond local measures of success, the
contribution of community forests to larger protected areas of forest
and open space helps support resource-based economies, and adds needed
resiliency to natural systems as they respond to climate change.
Therefore, in addition to public engagement to articulate local needs
and capacity, successful community forests in the CFP will be part of a
larger landscape level context that will protect many kinds of open
spaces and working lands that provide a variety of ecosystem services.
In this way, the program delivers local benefits that can also have a
larger impact, since these community forests will likely be part of a
larger conservation initiative.
Grant recipients will be required to provide the Forest Service
with a Geographic Information System (GIS) shapefile of CFP project
tracts and cost share tracts. The geospatial information will reside at
the National Information Center for State and Private Forestry. The
areas protected through this program will be able to be seen in map and
other formats on the Forest Service website. These GIS shapefiles will
allow the Forest Service to spatially track CFP program accomplishments
and allow the agency to calculate program outcomes and public benefits
provided by the lands protected through CFP. The Agency welcomes
comments on outcome measures for benefits provided by forests acquired
under the CFP.
Discussion of Specific Issues; Project Review and Selection Process
Under CFP, applications will be submitted to the State Forester or
equivalent Tribal Government official who will, in turn, conduct a
general review of all applications for eligibility and compatibility
with landscape conservation efforts. The proposed rule does not allow
submission of an application for a project to both CFP and the Forest
Legacy Program simultaneously. The State Forester or equivalent Tribal
Government official may provide technical assistance to applicants in
the preparation of applications and implementation of grants.
The Forest Service proposes to conduct a nationally competitive
review and ranking process to select projects for funding. The
application process is outlined in Sec. 230.3 of this proposed rule.
Individual applications will be ranked according to criteria outlined
in Sec. 230.5 of this proposed rule. The Forest Service anticipates
providing additional specificity on the review process, review
criteria, and timelines in an annual request for proposals (RFP). The
Forest Service requests public comment regarding the application
process outlined in Sec. 230.3 and the ranking criteria outlined in
Sec. 230.5 of this proposed rule
The Forest Service wants to minimize the amount of time between
issuing the RFP and funding the selected projects. To achieve this
goal, the Forest Service anticipates issuing an RFP each year, and
selecting projects during the first quarter of the following fiscal
year (October-December) subject to the availability of funds. The
proposed rule requires the State Forester or equivalent Tribal
Government official to forward all applications with recommendations to
the Forest Service. While the Forest Service anticipates this
intermediate step will add approximately 30 days to the review process,
the Agency believes that input from State Foresters and Tribal
Governments will be valuable in helping the Forest Service make final
funding decisions.
Project Compliance With the National Environmental Policy Act
Project grants are subject to National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and must comply with agency NEPA implementing procedures as
described in 40 CFR 1500-1508 as well as the Council on Environmental
Quality's NEPA procedures at 40 CFR 1500-1508. CFP grants are to be
used for transferring title and ownership of private lands to third
parties and will not fund any ground-disturbing activities. The Forest
Service has concluded that CFP grants fall under the categorical
exclusion provided in the Forest Service's NEPA procedures for
``acquisition of land or interest in land'' 36 CFR 220.6(d)(6); 73 FR
43084 (July 24, 2008). As a result, CFP project grants are excluded
from documentation in an environmental assessment or impact statement.
The applicability of the categorical exclusion will be confirmed
through scoping and a review for extraordinary circumstances.
Eligible Entities
The statute establishing CFP states that only local governments,
Tribal Governments, and qualified nonprofit organizations are eligible
to receive a grant through CFP. The statute also provided definitions
for those three eligible organizations. Local governments are defined
as municipal, county, and other local governments with jurisdiction
over local land use decisions. Tribal Governments are defined as those
that are federally recognized Tribes as prescribed by section 4 of the
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (U.S.C. 450b).
Finally, qualified nonprofit organizations are defined as charities
under the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) and which also
have a conservation purpose
[[Page 746]]
(26 U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)). A conservation purpose is defined as the
preservation of land for outdoor recreation or education, protection of
natural habitat or ecosystems, preservation of open space, and
preservation of historic lands or structures. Consistent with
regulations of the Internal Revenue Service (26 CFR 1.170A-14(c)(1))
qualified non-profit organizations must also have a commitment to
protect in perpetuity, the purposes for which the tract was acquired
under the CFP and demonstrate that they have the resources to enforce
the protection of the property as a community forest. In general, a
land conservancy or land trust is the type of organization that would
be considered a qualified nonprofit organization under the authorizing
statute of the CFP.
Ensuring Permanence of Community Forest Projects
In order to minimize the chances that the property is ever sold, or
converted to non-forest uses, the following four actions will be
required of the grant recipient:
(1) Grant recipients will be required to record a Notice of Grant
Requirements with the deed in the lands records of the local county or
municipality.
(2) Grant recipients will define objectives for the use and
management of the community forest in the required Community Forest
Plan. Because the size, condition, and possible uses of community
forests under this program could be quite varied, the Community Forest
Plan will identify forest uses for the property. In order to guide
compliance with the requirements of the CFP, ``non-forest uses'' is
defined in Sec. 230.2 of this proposed rule.
(3) Every ten years, grant recipients will submit to the Forest
Service a self-certifying statement that the property has not been sold
or converted to non-forest uses.
(4) Grant recipients will be subject to a spot check conducted by
the Forest Service to verify that property acquired under the CFP has
not been sold or converted to non-forest uses (Sec. 230.2).
In the statute establishing the CFP, Congress required that the
grant recipient cannot sell the land or convert it to non-forest uses
(Sec. 8003.e). In the event that these conditions are violated, the law
requires that the grant recipient pay the Federal Government an amount
equal to the greater of the current sale price or current appraised
value of the land. An additional penalty is that the grant recipient
that sells or converts a parcel acquired under the CFP will not be
allowed to receive additional grants under the program. Ramifications
for conversion to non-forest use or sale is discussed in Sec. 230.9
``Ownership Use and Requirements'' of this proposed rule.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal
and Federally-Assisted Programs
The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policy Act of 1970 (``Uniform Act'') (42 U.S.C. 4601, et. seq.)
provides guidance and procedures for the acquisition of real property
by the Federal government, including relocation benefits to displaced
persons. Department of Transportation regulations implementing the
Uniform Act (49 CFR 24) have been adopted by the Department of
Agriculture (7 CFR 21). However, CFP is deemed exempt from the Uniform
Act because it meets the exemption criteria stated at 49 CFR
24.101(b)(1).
Federal Appraisal Standards
Section 7A(c)(4) of the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act (16
U.S.C. 2103d(c)(4)), requires that land acquired under CFP be appraised
in accordance with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land
Acquisitions (Federal Appraisal Standards) in order to determine the
non-Federal share of the cost of a parcel of privately-owned forest
land. The Federal Appraisal Standards are contained in a readily
available public document, which is well known to professional
appraisers (see: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Legal_Documents.html). A
grant recipient will be responsible for assuring that the appraisal of
the CFP tract is done in conformance with the Federal Appraisal
Standards. The Federal Appraisal Standards will be used to determine
reimbursement for the non-Federal cost share. However, separate tracts
donated for the purpose of providing the non-Federal cost share may be
appraised using the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP) or the IRS regulations for a donation in land. The
Forest Service will be available to assist applicants with the
appraisal and associated appraisal review, and will conduct spot checks
to assure compliance with Federal Appraisal Standards.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule has been reviewed under USDA procedures and
Executive Order 12866. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
determined that this proposed rule is significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866. A Cost Benefit Analysis has been completed and
has determined that the benefits for each established forests will
vary, depending on characteristics of the forest land, the community,
and the management objectives developed with public input in the
establishment of the required community forest plan. Where these
forests are located will also be dependent on the communities that
support them, therefore, they could occur in communities from the very
rural to decidedly urban. Since there will be diversity among forests
and their benefits, this analysis uses qualitative as well as
quantitative methods to describe the potential benefits and costs of
CFP.
The primary cost of CFP is the acquisition of the land itself. The
transfer of lands from private property may reduce the tax base, or
result in forgone economic benefits fostered by development. This
analysis assumes that development and associated activity is
established elsewhere without resulting in forestland conservation and
the opportunity cost of lower economic activity is off-set by the
benefits provided by the community forest, such that the main costs
become the cost of the acquisition and the tax revenue foregone by the
local government unit. These costs are compared with the benefits of
protecting forest land, which are largely intangibles, such as
environmental goods and services from the land and non-market valued
amenities, such as open spaces and scenic views, but also includes the
economic value of retaining and active working forest in the local
economy. Qualitative and quantitative evidence supports the assertion
that community forests provide many benefits to communities, especially
in areas threatened by conversion of private forest land.
This proposed rule will not have an annual effect of $100 million
or more on the economy nor adversely affect productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, nor adversely affect
State or local governments. This proposed rule will not interfere with
an action taken or planned by another agency nor raise new legal or
policy issues. Finally, this proposed rule will not alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients of such programs.
This proposed rule does not regulate the private use of land or the
conduct of business. It is a grant program to local governments, Tribal
Government and qualified nonprofit organizations for purposes of
acquiring land for resource
[[Page 747]]
conservation and open space preservation. By providing funding to
eligible entities for land acquisition, the Federal Government will
promote the non-monetary benefits of sustainable forest management.
These benefits include: improved water quality, wildlife and fish
habitat, forest based educational programs including vocational
education programs in forestry, replicable models of effective forest
stewardship for private landowners, open space preservation, carbon
sequestration, and enhanced recreational opportunities including
hunting and fishing.
The acquisition of land by eligible entities may affect the local
real property tax base, depending on applicable state law and the tax
status of the acquiring entity. The possible impact on the real
property tax base is not possible to ascertain, but is assumed that any
land going from taxable to non-taxable status would cause a
commensurate shifting of the tax burden to other taxable properties or,
alternatively, a reduction in local tax revenues.
As a new program, CFP would not materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, user fees, loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of program participants. The program is voluntary for each
participating eligible entity.
Proper Consideration of Small Entities
This proposed rule has been considered in light of Executive order
13272 regarding property considerations of small entities and the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. The proposed rule
for voluntary participation in the CFP does not impose significant
direct costs on small entities. This proposed rule imposes no
additional requirements on the affected public. Entities most likely
affected by this proposed rule are the local governments, qualified
nonprofit organizations, and Tribal governments eligible to receive a
grant through CFP. The minimum requirements on small entities imposed
by this proposed rule are necessary to protect the public interest, not
administratively burdensome or costly to meet, and are within the
capabilities of small entities to perform. The proposed rule would not
materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, user fees, loan
programs, or the rights and obligations of program participants. It
does not compel the expenditure of $100 million or more by any State,
local or Indian Tribal government, or anyone in the private sector.
Under these circumstances, the Forest Service has determined that this
action would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538), which the President signed into law on March 22,
1995, the Agency has assessed the effects of this proposed rule on
State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This
proposed rule does not compel the expenditure of $100 million or more
by any State, local or Indian Tribal governments, or anyone in the
private sector. Therefore, a statement under section 202 of that Act is
not required.
Federalism
The Forest Service has considered this rule under the requirements
of Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and Executive Order 12875,
Government Partnerships. The Forest Service has determined that the
rule conforms with the federalism principles set out in these Executive
Orders. The rule would not impose any compliance costs on the States
other than those imposed by statute, and would not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Based on
comments received on this proposed rule, the Agency will consider if
any additional consultations will be needed with the State and local
governments prior to adopting a final rule.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35], the Forest Service is requesting an approval of a new
information collection.
Title: Proposed substitution of 36 CFR part 230, Subpart A with
Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program.
OMB Number: 0596-New.
Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from approval date.
Type of Request: New information collection.
Abstract: The purpose of CFP is to achieve community benefits
through grants to local governments, Tribal Governments, and qualified
nonprofit organizations to establish community forests by acquiring and
protecting private forestlands. This proposed rule includes information
requirements necessary to implement CFP and comply with grants
regulations and OMB Circulars. The information requirements will be
used to help the Forest Service in the following areas:
(1) To determine that the applicant is eligible to receive funds
under the program,
(2) To determine if the proposal meets the qualifications in the
law and regulations,
(3) To evaluate and rank the proposals based on a standard,
consistent information, and
(4) To determine if the projects costs are allowable, and
sufficient cost share is provided.
Local governmental entities, Tribal Governments, and qualified
nonprofit organizations are the only entities eligible for the program,
and therefore are the only organizations from which information will be
collected.
The information collection required for a request for proposals and
grant application, is approved and assigned Office of Management and
Budget Control (OMB) No. 0596-New. The information collection required
for a proposed bonded notice in this proposed rule has been submitted
to OMB as a new collection.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 180.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 180.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 5,800 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consultations and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule has tribal implications as defined in Executive
Order 13175. Section 7A(a)(1) of the Cooperative Forestry Assistance
Act establishes that Federally recognized Indian tribes are eligible
entities to participate in the CFP. In accordance with the President's
memorandum of
[[Page 748]]
April 29, 1994, ``Government-to-Government Relations with Native
American Tribal Governments'' (59 FR 22951); the Executive Order of
November 6, 2000, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments'' (EO 13175); and with the directives of the Department of
Agriculture (DR1350-001); we have determined that specific effects on
Indian tribes are likely to occur through implementation of the CFP
and, therefore, the opportunity for government-to-government
consultation will be provided. Tribal consultation will be accomplished
through local and regional consultation processes in coordination with
the Washington Office of the Forest Service.
Tribal consultation was initiated on October 20, 2010, and is
currently ongoing. No Tribal input has been received during the initial
60-day period. Consultation will continue during the 60-day public
comment period.
No Takings Implementations
This proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12630, and it has
been determined that the proposed rule does not pose the risk of a
taking of constitutionally protected private property. This proposed
rule implements a program to assist eligible entities to acquire land
from willing landowners. Any land use restrictions are voluntarily
undertaken by program participants.
Environmental Impact
The Forest Service has determined that this proposed rule falls
under the categorical exclusion provided in Forest Service regulations
on National Environmental Policy Act procedures. Such procedures
exclude from documentation in an environmental assessment or impact
statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to establish service wide
administrative procedures, program processes, or instructions.'' 36 CFR
220.6(d)(2); 73 FR 43084 (July 24, 2008). This proposed rule outlines
the programmatic implementation of CFP, and as such, has no direct
effect on Forest Service decisions for land management activities.
Energy Effects
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13211 of
May 18, 2001, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. It has been determined that this
proposed rule does not constitute a significant energy action as
defined in the Executive Order.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. The Forest Service has not identified any State
or local laws or regulations that are in conflict with this proposed
rule or that would impede full implementation of this proposed rule.
Nevertheless, in the event that such a conflict was to be identified,
the proposed rule would preempt the State or local laws or regulations
found to be in conflict. However, in that case, no retroactive effect
would be given to this rule, and the Forest Service would not require
the use of administrative proceedings before parties could file suit in
court challenging its provisions.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 230
Grant programs, Grants administration, State and local governments,
Tribal governments, Nonprofit organizations, Conservation, Forests and
forest products, Land sales.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Forest
Service proposes to amend part 230 of Title 36 of the Code of Federal
Regulations by revising subpart A to read as follows:
PART 230--STATE AND PRIVATE FORESTRY ASSISTANCE
1. The authority citation for part 230 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 2103(d) & 2109(e).
2. Revise Subpart A to read as follows.
Subpart A--Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program
Sec.
230.1 Purpose and scope.
230.2 Definitions.
230.3 Application process.
230.4 Application requirements.
230.5 Ranking criteria and proposal selection.
230.6 Project costs and cost share requirements.
230.7 Grant requirements.
230.8 Acquisition requirements.
230.9 Ownership and use requirements.
230.10 Technical assistance funds.
Subpart A--Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program
Sec. 230.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) The regulations of this subpart govern the rules and procedures
for the Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program (CFP),
established under Section 7A of the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act
of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2103d). Under CFP, the Secretary of Agriculture,
acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, awards grants to local
governments, Tribal Governments, and qualified nonprofit organizations
to establish community forests for community benefits by acquiring and
protecting private forestlands.
(b) The CFP applies to eligible entities within any of the 50
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of
the Marshall Islands, the Republic of Palau, and the territories and
possessions of the United States.
Sec. 230.2 Definitions.
The terms used in this subpart are defined as follows:
Community benefits. One or more of the following:
(1) Economic benefits such as timber and non-timber products
resulting from sustainable forest management and tourism;
(2) Environmental benefits, including clean water, stormwater
management, and wildlife habitat;
(3) Benefits from forest-based educational programs, including
vocational education programs in forestry;
(4) Benefits from serving as replicable models of effective forest
stewardship for private landowners;
(5) Recreational benefits, such as hiking, hunting and fishing; and
(6) Public access.
Community forest. Forest land owned in fee simple by an eligible
entity that provides public access and is managed to provide community
benefits pursuant to a community forest plan.
Community forest plan. A tract-specific plan that guides the
management and use of this community forest, developed with community
involvement, and includes the following components:
(1) A description of the property, including acreage and county
location, land use, forest type and vegetation cover;
(2) Objectives for the community forest;
(3) Community benefits to be achieved from the establishment of the
community forest;
(4) Mechanisms promoting community involvement in the development
and implementation of the community forest plan;
(5) Implementation strategies for achieving community forest plan
objectives;
(6) Plans for the utilization or demolition of existing structures
and proposed needs for further improvements; and,
(7) Long-term use and management of the property.
[[Page 749]]
Eligible entity. A local governmental entity, Tribal Government, or
a qualified nonprofit organization that is qualified to acquire and
manage land.
Eligible lands. Private forest lands that:
(1) Are threatened by conversion to nonforest uses;
(2) Are not lands held in trust by the United States on behalf of
any Tribal Government or allotment lands; and,
(3) If acquired by an eligible entity, can provide defined
community benefits under CFP and allow public access.
Equivalent tribal government official. An individual designated and
authorized by the Tribal Government.
Federal appraisal standards. The Uniform Appraisal Standards for
Federal Land Acquisitions developed by the Interagency Land Acquisition
Conference.
Forest lands. Lands that are at least five acres in size, suitable
to sustain natural vegetation, and at least 75 percent forested.
Grant recipient: An eligible entity that receives a grant from the
U.S. Forest Service through the CFP.
Landscape conservation initiative. A landscape-level conservation
or management plan or activity that identifies conservation needs and
goals of a locality, state, or region. Conservation goals identified
need to correspond with the community and environmental benefits
outlined for the CFP.
Local governmental entity. Any municipal government, county
government, or other local government body with jurisdiction over local
land use decisions as defined by Federal or State law.
Non-forest uses. Activities that threaten forest cover and are
inconsistent with the Community Forest Plan, and include the following:
(1) Subdivision;
(2) Residential development, except for a caretaker building;
(3) Mining and nonrenewable resource extraction, except for
activities that would not require surface disturbance of the community
forest such as directional drilling for oil and gas development;
(4) Industrial use, including the manufacturing of products;
(5) Commercial use, except for sustainable timber or other
renewable resources, and limited compatible commercial activities to
support cultural, recreational and educational use of the community
forest by the public; and
(6) Structures and facilities, except for compatible recreational
facilities, concession and educational kiosks, energy development for
onsite use and parking areas. Said structures, facilities and parking
areas must have minimal impacts to forest and water resources.
Qualified nonprofit organization. Defined by the CFP authorizing
statute (Public Law 110-234; 122 Stat. at 1281), an organization that
is described in section 170(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(26 U.S.C. 170(h)(3)) and operates in accordance with one or more of
the conservation purposes specified in section 170(h)(4)(A) of that
Code (26 U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)). For the purposes of CFP, a qualified
nonprofit organization must meet the following requirements:
(1) Consistent with regulations of the Internal Revenue Service at
26 CFR 1.170A-14(c)(1):
(i) Have a commitment to protect in perpetuity the purposes for
which the tract was acquired under the CFP; and
(ii) Demonstrate that it has the resources to enforce the
protection of the property as a community forest as a condition of
acquiring a tract under the CFP.
(2) Operate primarily or substantially in accordance with one or
more of the conservation purposes specified in section 170(h)(4)(A) of
I.R.S. code (26 U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)). Conservation purposes include:
(i) The preservation of land areas for outdoor recreation by, or
the education of, the general public,
(ii) The protection of a relatively natural habitat of fish,
wildlife, or plants, or similar ecosystem,
(iii) The preservation of open space (including farmland and forest
land) where such preservation is for the scenic enjoyment of the
general public, or pursuant to a clearly delineated Federal, State, or
local governmental conservation policy, and will yield a significant
public benefit, or
(iv) The preservation of a historically important land area or a
certified historic structure.
Public access. Access that is provided on a non-discriminatory
basis at reasonable times and places, but may be limited by actions
protecting resources or public health and safety.
State forester. The State employee who is responsible for
administration and delivery of forestry assistance within a State.
Tribal government. Defined by section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b).
Sec. 230.3 Application process.
(a) The Forest Service will issue a national request for proposals
(RFP) for grants under the CFP. The RFP will include the following
information outlined in this proposed rule:
(1) The process for submitting an application;
(2) Application requirements (Sec. 230.4);
(3) Review process and criteria that will be used by the Forest
Service, the State Forester, and equivalent Tribal Government official
(Sec. 230.5); and
(4) Other conditions determined appropriate by the Forest Service.
(b) Pursuant to the RFP, interested eligible entities will submit
an application for program participation to:
(1) The State Forester, for applications by local governments and
qualified nonprofit organizations, or
(2) The equivalent Tribal Government official, for applications
submitted by a Tribal Government.
(c) The State Forester or equivalent Tribal Government official
will review all applications and assess:
(1) That the applicant is an eligible entity;
(2) That the land is eligible; and
(3) Whether the project contributes to a landscape conservation
initiative.
(d) In accordance with the RFP, the State Forester or equivalent
Tribal Government official will forward all applications to the Forest
Service, and
(1) Provide an assessment of each application, and
(2) Describe what technical assistance they may render in support
of applications and an estimate of needed financial assistance (Sec.
230.10).
(e) A proposed application cannot be submitted for funding
consideration simultaneously for both CFP and the Forest Service's
Forest Legacy Program (16 U.S.C. 2103c).
Sec. 230.4 Application requirements.
The following section outlines minimum application requirements,
but the RFP may include additional requirements.
(a) Documentation verifying that the applicant is an eligible
entity and that the proposed acquisition is of eligible land that
contains forest land.
(b) Applications must include the following regarding the property
proposed for acquisition:
(1) A description of the property, including acreage and county
location;
(2) A description of current land uses, including improvements;
(3) A description of forest type and vegetative cover;
(4) A map of sufficient scale to show the location of the property
in relation to roads and other improvements as well as parks, refuges,
or other protected lands in the vicinity;
[[Page 750]]
(5) A description of applicable zoning and other land use
regulations affecting the property;
(6) Relationship of the property within and its contributions to a
landscape conservation initiative; and
(7) A description of any threats of conversion to nonforest uses.
(c) Information regarding the proposed establishment of a community
forest, including:
(1) A description of the benefiting community, including
demographics, and the associated benefits provided by the proposed land
acquisition;
(2) A description of the community involvement in the planning and
long-term management of the community forest;
(3) An identification of persons and organizations that support the
project and their specific role in acquiring the land and establishing
and managing the community forest; and
(4) A draft Community Forest Plan. The eligible entity is
encouraged to work with the State Forester or equivalent Tribal
Government official for technical assistance when developing or
updating the Community Forest Plan.
(d) Information regarding the proposed land acquisition, including:
(1) A proposed project budget (Sec. 230.6);
(2) The status of due diligence, including signed option or
purchase and sale agreement, title search, minerals determination, and
appraisal;
(3) Description and status of cost share (secure, pending,
commitment letter, etc.) (Sec. 230.6);
(4) The status of negotiations with participating landowner(s)
including purchase options, contracts, and other terms and conditions
of sale;
(5) The proposed timeline for completing the acquisition and
establishing the community forest; and
(6) Long term management costs and funding source(s).
(e) Applications must comply with the Uniform Federal Assistance
Regulations (7 CFR 3015).
(f) Applications must also include the forms required to process a
Federal grant. Section 230.7 references the grant forms that must be
included in the application and the specific administrative
requirements that apply to the type of Federal grant used for this
program.
Sec. 230.5 Ranking criteria and proposal selection.
(a) Using the criteria described below, to the extent practicable,
the Forest Service will give priority to:
(1) An application that maximizes the delivery of community
benefits, as defined in this proposed rule, through a high degree of
public participation; and
(2) An application with a subject property that makes a substantial
contribution to a landscape conservation initiative. A landscape
conservation initiative, as defined in this proposed rule, is a
landscape-level conservation or management plan or activity that
identifies conservation needs and goals of a locality, state, or
region.
(b) The Forest Service will evaluate applications received by the
State Foresters and equivalent Tribal Government officials and award
grants based on the following criteria:
(1) Type and extent of community benefits provided. Community
benefits are defined in this proposed rule as:
(i) Economic benefits such as timber and non-timber products
resulting from sustainable forest management and tourism;
(ii) Environmental benefits, including clean water, stormwater
management, and wildlife habitat;
(iii) Benefits from forest-based educational programs, including
vocational education programs in forestry;
(iv) Benefits from serving as replicable models of effective forest
stewardship for private landowners;
(v) Recreational benefits, such as hiking, hunting and fishing; and
(vi) Public access.
(2) Extent and nature of community engagement in the establishment
and long-term management of the community forest;
(3) Amount of cost share leveraged;
(4) Extent to which the community forest contributes to a landscape
conservation initiative;
(5) Extent of due diligence completed on the project, including
cost share committed and status of appraisal;
(6) Likelihood that, unprotected, the property would be converted
to non-forest uses;
(7) Costs to the Federal government; and
(8) Additional considerations as may be outlined in the RFP.
Sec. 230.6 Project costs and cost share requirements.
(a) The CFP Federal contribution cannot exceed 50 percent of the
total project costs.
(b) Allowable project and cost share costs will include the
purchase price and the following transactional costs associated with
the acquisition: Appraisals and appraisal reviews, land surveys, legal
and closing costs, development of the community forest plan, and title
examination. The following principles and procedures will determine
allowable costs for grants:
(1) For local and Tribal governments, refer to OMB Circular A-87
(Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments).
(2) For nonprofit organizations, refer to OMB Circular A-122 (Cost
Principles for Nonprofit Organizations).
(c) Project costs do not include the following:
(1) Long-term operations, maintenance, and management of the land;
(2) Construction of buildings or recreational facilities;
(3) Research;
(4) Existing liens or taxes owed; and
(5) Costs associated with preparation of the application, except
for appraisals and the community forest plan.
(d) Cost share contributions can include cash, in-kind services, or
donations and must meet the following requirements:
(1) Be supported by grant regulations described above;
(2) Not include other federal funds unless specifically authorized
by Federal statute;
(3) Not include non-federal funds used as cost share for other
federal programs;
(4) Not include funds used to satisfy mandatory or compensatory
mitigation requirements under a Federal regulation, such as Clean Water
Act, River and Harbor Act, or Endangered Species Act;
(5) Not include borrowed funds; and
(6) Must be accomplished within the grant period.
(e) Cost share contributions may include the purchase or donation
of lands located within the community forest as long as it is provided
by an eligible entity and legally dedicated to perpetual land
conservation consistent with CFP program objectives.
(f) For the purposes of calculating the cost share contribution,
the grant recipient may request the inclusion of project due diligence
costs such as title review and appraisals that incurred prior to
issuance of the grant. These pre-award costs may occur up to one year
prior to the issuance of the grant, but cannot include the purchase of
CFP land, including cost share tracts.
Sec. 230.7 Grant requirements.
(a) The following grant forms and supporting materials must be
included in the application:
(1) An Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424);
(2) Budget information (Standard Form SF 424c--Construction
Programs);
[[Page 751]]
(3) Assurances of compliance with all applicable Federal laws,
regulations, and policies (Standard Form 424d--Construction Programs);
and
(4) Additional forms as may be required.
(b) Once an application is selected, funding will be obligated to
the grant recipient through a grant.
(c) The initial grant period will be two years, and acquisition of
lands should occur within that timeframe. The grant may be reasonably
extended by the Forest Service for an additional 12 months when
necessary to accommodate unforeseen circumstances in the land
acquisition process.
(d) The grant paperwork must adhere to grant requirements listed
below.
(1) Local and Tribal governments should refer to OMB Circular A-102
(Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments)
and 7 CFR 3016 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments) for directions.
(2) Nonprofit organizations should refer to OMB Circular A-110
(Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Nonprofit
Organizations) and 7 CFR 3019 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations) for
directions.
(e) Forest Service must approve any amendment to a proposal or
request to reallocate funding within a grant proposal. If negotiations
on a selected project fail, the applicant cannot substitute an
alternative site.
(f) The grant recipient must comply with the requirements in Sec.
230.8 before funds will be released.
(g) After the project has closed, as a requirement of the grant,
grant recipients will be required to provide the Forest Service with a
Geographic Information System (GIS) shapefile of CFP project tracts and
cost share tracts.
(h) Any funds not expended within the grant period must be de-
obligated and revert to the Forest Service for redistribution through
CFP process.
(i) All media, press, signage, and other documents discussing the
creation of the community forest must reference the partnership and
financial assistance by the Forest Service through CFP.
Sec. 230.8 Acquisition requirements.
(a) Grant recipients participating in CFP must complete the
following, which applies to all tracts, including cost share tracts:
(1) Complete an appraisal.
(i) For lands purchased with CFP funds, the appraisal must comply
with Federal Appraisal Standards prior to the release of the grant
funds. The grant recipient must provide documentation that the
appraisal and associated appraisal review were conducted in a manner
consistent with the Federal appraisal standards.
(ii) For donated cost share tracts, the market value must be
determined by an independent appraiser. The value needs to be
documented by a responsible official of the party to which the property
is donated.
(2) Prior to closing, notify the landowner in writing of the
appraised value of the property and that the sale is voluntary. If the
grant recipient has a voluntary option for less than appraised value,
they do not have to renegotiate the agreement.
(3) Purchase all surface and subsurface mineral rights, whenever
possible. However, if severed mineral rights cannot be obtained, then
the grant recipient must follow the retention of qualified mineral
interest requirements outlined in the Internal Revenue Service
regulations (26 CFR 1.170A-14 (g)(4)), which address both surface and
subsurface minerals.
(4) Ensure that title to lands acquired conforms with title
standards applicable to state land acquisitions where the land is
located.
(i) Title to lands acquired using CFP funds must not be subject to
outstanding or reserved property rights or future interests the
reasonable exercise of which would be contrary to the purposes for
which the land was acquired.
(ii) Whenever possible, title insurance must be secured for the
full value of the land, with the United States named as an additional
insured on the policy.
(iii) Title insurance must not be a substitute for acceptable
title.
(5) Record with the deed in the lands record of the local county or
municipality, a Notice of Grant Requirement, which includes the
following:
(i) States that the property (including cost share tracts) was
purchased with CFP funds;
(ii) Provides a legal description;
(iii) Identifies the name and address of the grant recipient who is
the authorized title holder;
(iv) States the purpose of the CFP;
(v) References the Grant Agreement with the Forest Service (title
and agreement number) and the address where it is kept on file;
(vi) States that the grant recipient confirms its obligation to
manage the interest in real property pursuant to the grant, the
Community Forest Plan, and the purpose of the CFP;
(vii) States that the grant recipient will not convey or encumber
the interest in real property, in whole or in part, to another party;
and
(viii) States that the grant recipient will manage the interest in
real property consistent with the purpose of the CFP.
Sec. 230.09 Ownership and use requirements.
(a) Complete the final Community Forest Plan within 120 days of the
land acquisition, and must be updated periodically, but at least every
ten years.
(b) Provide appropriate public access.
(c) In the event that a grant recipient sells or converts to
nonforest use, a parcel of land acquired under CFP, the grant recipient
must:
(1) Pay the United States an amount equal to the current sale price
or the current appraised value of the parcel, whichever is greater; and
(2) Not be eligible for additional grants under CFP.
(d) For Tribal Governments, land acquired using a grant provided
under CFP must not be sold, converted to non-forest uses, or converted
to land held in trust by the United States on behalf of any Tribal
Government.
(e) Every ten years, the grant recipients will submit to the Forest
Service an updated Community Forest Plan and a self-certifying
statement that the property has not been sold or converted to non-
forest uses.
(f) Grant recipients will be subject to a spot check conducted by
the Forest Service to verify that property acquired under the CFP has
not been sold or converted to non-forest uses.
Sec. 230.10 Technical assistance funds.
CFP technical assistance funds will be provided to State Foresters
and equivalent Tribal Government officials through an administrative
grant to help implement community forest projects funded through CFP,
and as a result, funds will only be provided to States or Tribal
Government with a CFP project funded within their jurisdiction. Section
7A (f) of the authorizing statute limits the funds made available for
program administration and technical assistance to not more than 10% of
all funds made available to carry out the program for each fiscal year.
Dated: December 30, 2010.
Jay Jensen,
Deputy Under Secretary, NRE.
[FR Doc. 2010-33344 Filed 1-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P