Keystone Holdings, LLC and Compagnie de Saint-Gobain; Analysis of Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment, 555-558 [2010-33245]
Download as PDF
555
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2011 / Notices
Dated: December 30, 2010.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License; Reissuance
[FR Doc. 2010–33353 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am]
Notice is hereby given that the
following Ocean Transportation
Intermediary license has been reissued
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
by the Federal Maritime Commission
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping
Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and
the regulations of the Commission
pertaining to the licensing of Ocean
Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR
part 515.
License No.
Name/Address
021037N ................................................
All West Coast Shipping Inc., dba West Coast Shipping, 1065 Broadway Avenue, San Pablo, CA 94806.
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification and
Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010–33352 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License; Rescission of Order of
Revocation
Notice is hereby given that the Order
revoking the following license is being
rescinded by the Federal Maritime
Commission pursuant to section 19 of
the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C.
chapter 409) and the regulations of the
Commission pertaining to the licensing
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries,
46 CFR part 515.
License Number: 017572F.
Name: Impex of Doral Logistics, Inc.
Address: 7850 NW. 80th Street, Unit
3, Medley, FL 33166.
Order Published: FR: 11/26/10
(Volume 75, No. 227 Pg. 72825).
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification and
Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010–33351 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License Revocation
The Federal Maritime Commission
hereby gives notice that the following
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
licenses have been revoked pursuant to
section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984
(46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the
regulations of the Commission
pertaining to the licensing of Ocean
Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR
part 515, effective on the corresponding
date shown below:
License Number: 017080N.
Name: General Cargo & Logistics.
Address: 17828 S. Main Street,
Carson, CA 90248.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Jan 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
Date Revoked: November 21, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License Number: 17715N.
Name: Yurram Corporation dba
Starliner Shipping & Travel.
Address: 5305 Church Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11203.
Date Revoked: November 28, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License Number: 18429F.
Name: AB Shipping, Inc.
Address: 5428 El Monte Avenue,
Temple City, CA 91780.
Date Revoked: November 15, 2010.
Reason: Surrendered license
voluntarily.
License Number: 019823NF.
Name: General Logistic Solutions
Corp.
Address: 6701 NW. 7th Street, Suite
135, Miami, FL 33126.
Date Revoked: November 25, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain valid
bonds.
License Number: 020198N.
Name: Pan America Marine Services.
Address: 651 West Homestead Road,
No. 3, Sunnyvale, CA 94087.
Date Revoked: November 21, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License Number: 020445N.
Name: Freight It, Inc.
Address: 11222 La Cienega Blvd.,
Suite 555, Inglewood, CA 90304.
Date Revoked: November 26, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License Number: 020824N.
Name: Clarion Logistics USA, Inc.
Address: 1200 NW. 17th Avenue,
Suite 18, Delray Beach, FL 33445.
Date Revoked: November 29, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License Number: 021789F.
Name: Daleray Corporation.
Address: 3350 SW. 3rd Avenue, Suite
207, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33315.
Date Revoked: November 30, 2010.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date Reissued
November 7, 2010.
License Number: 021844NF.
Name: Transport Logistics, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 636, Oak Creek, WI
53154.
Date Revoked: November 30, 2010.
Reason: Surrendered license
voluntarily.
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification and
Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010–33346 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 101 0175]
Keystone Holdings, LLC and
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain; Analysis
of Proposed Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before February 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments
electronically or in paper form.
Comments should refer to ‘‘Keystone,
File No. 101 0175 to facilitate the
organization of comments. Please note
that your comment—including your
name and your state—will be placed on
the public record of this proceeding,
including on the publicly accessible
FTC Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm.
Because comments will be made
public, they should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
556
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
an individual’s Social Security Number;
date of birth; driver’s license number or
other state identification number, or
foreign country equivalent; passport
number; financial account number; or
credit or debit card number. Comments
also should not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, comments should not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is obtained
from any person and which is privileged
or confidential * * *, as provided in
Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and Commission Rule 4.10(a)(2),
16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). Comments containing
material for which confidential
treatment is requested must be filed in
paper form, must be clearly labeled
‘‘Confidential and must comply with
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).1
Because paper mail addressed to the
FTC is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening, please
consider submitting your comments in
electronic form. Comments filed in
electronic form should be submitted by
using the following weblink: https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
keystone and following the instructions
on the web-based form. To ensure that
the Commission considers an electronic
comment, you must file it on the webbased form at the Weblink: https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
keystone. If this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp,
you may also file an electronic comment
through that website. The Commission
will consider all comments that
regulations.gov forwards to it. You may
also visit the FTC Web site at https://
www.ftc.gov/ to read the Notice and the
news release describing it.
A comment filed in paper form
should include the ‘‘Keystone, File No.
101 0175 reference both in the text and
on the envelope, and should be mailed
or delivered to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Room H–135 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is
requesting that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to
1 The comment must be accompanied by an
explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record.
The request will be granted or denied by the
Commissions General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See FTC
Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Jan 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
delay due to heightened security
precautions.
The Federal Trade Commission Act
(‘‘FTC Act) and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives,
whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be
available to the public on the FTC Web
site, to the extent practicable, at https://
www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm.
As a matter of discretion, the
Commission makes every effort to
remove home contact information for
individuals from the public comments it
receives before placing those comments
on the FTC website. More information,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s
privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/
ftc/privacy.shtm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria Lippincott (202–326–2983),
Bureau of Competition, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
Pursuant
to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and § 2.34 the Commission Rules
of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for December 29, 2010), on
the World Wide Web, at https://
www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper
copy can be obtained from the FTC
Public Reference Room, Room 130–H,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, either in person
or by calling (202) 326–2222.
Public comments are invited, and may
be filed with the Commission in either
paper or electronic form. All comments
should be filed as prescribed in the
ADDRESSES section above, and must be
received on or before the date specified
in the DATES section.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
I. Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission) has accepted for public
comment, subject to final approval, an
Agreement Containing Consent Order
(‘‘Consent Agreement) from Keystone
Holdings LLC (‘‘Keystone) and
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain (‘‘SaintGobain’’). The purpose of the proposed
Consent Agreement is to remedy the
anticompetitive effects resulting from
Keystone’s proposed acquisition of
certain Advanced Ceramics Business
assets from Saint-Gobain (‘‘proposed
acquisition). As originally structured,
Keystone would have acquired SaintGobain’s worldwide assets and
businesses relating to the manufacture
and sale of alumina wear tiles. To
resolve the competitive concerns raised
by the proposed acquisition, Keystone
and Saint-Gobain have re-structured the
original transaction to exclude SaintGobain’s North American alumina wear
tile business operated out of a facility in
Latrobe, Pennsylvania.
Under the terms of the proposed
Consent Agreement, Keystone is
required for ten years to obtain prior
approval from the Commission for the
direct or indirect acquisition of SaintGobain’s alumina wear tile business in
Latrobe or certain other assets owned or
controlled by Saint-Gobain relating to
the research, development, marketing,
and sale anywhere in the world of
alumina wear tile produced or
manufactured in North America. The
proposed Consent Agreement also
requires that Saint-Gobain for five years
provide advance written notice to the
Commission prior to leasing or selling
the Latrobe, Pennsylvania facility or
selling, assigning, or otherwise
conveying substantially all its interest in
the Saint-Gobain alumina wear tile
business. In addition, with limited
exceptions, Saint-Gobain is obligated to
provide advance written notice to the
Commission prior to closing the
Latrobe, Pennsylvania facility or ceasing
operation or production of alumina
wear tiles at the facility.
The proposed Consent Agreement has
been placed on the public record for
thirty days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
the public record. After thirty days, the
Commission will again review the
proposed Consent Agreement and the
comments received, and will decide
whether it should withdraw from the
proposed Consent Agreement, modify it,
or make it final.
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2011 / Notices
On June 28, 2010, Keystone and SaintGobain entered into a merger agreement
under which Keystone proposed to
acquire Saint-Gobain’s Advanced
Ceramics Business, including facilities
in Europe, North America, South
America, and Asia for a purchase price
of $245 million. As originally
structured, the assets acquired by
Keystone would have included the
Latrobe facility and other assets relating
to the manufacture and sale of alumina
wear tiles. On December 2, 2010,
however, in an effort to resolve
competitive concerns relating to the
original transaction, Keystone and
Saint-Gobain amended their agreement
to exclude from the sale Saint-Gobain’s
North American alumina wear tile
business.
The Commission’s complaint alleges
that the initial proposed acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 7
of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 45, by lessening competition in
the manufacture and sale of standard
and pre-engineered alumina wear tile in
North America. Although Saint-Gobain
now proposes to retain its North
American alumina wear tile business, a
credible risk exists that the parties could
re-negotiate the sale of Saint-Gobain’s
alumina wear tile business in the future,
or that Saint-Gobain could sell the
business upon terms that would reduce
competition in the North American
alumina wear tile markets. Therefore,
the proposed Consent Agreement
requires that Keystone obtain the
Commission’s prior approval in advance
of any acquisition of Saint-Gobain’s
alumina wear tile business or related
assets, and requires that Saint-Gobain
provide written notice to the
Commission prior to selling or ceasing
its alumina wear tile business or selling
or leasing its Latrobe, Pennsylvania
facility. This remedy preserves
competition in the North American
markets for the manufacture and sale of
alumina wear tile.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
II. Parties
Keystone is the holding company of
CoorsTek, Inc. (‘‘CoorsTek), which is a
leading technical ceramics
manufacturer, supplying ceramics based
products for use in defense, medical,
automotive, semiconductor, and power
generation applications, among others.
Keystone is headquartered in Golden,
Colorado with facilities in North
America, Europe and Asia. Keystone
manufactures and sells alumina wear
tile for use in high wear applications at
its facilities in Golden, Colorado.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Jan 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
Saint-Gobain is a highly diversified,
multinational company, headquartered
in Courbevoie, France. The Advanced
Ceramics Business includes ceramic
components such as hot surface igniters,
electro-ceramic parts for household
appliances, ceramic balls for highperformance bearings, automobile water
pump seals, special components for the
semiconductor industry, agricultural
spray nozzles, and other dense alumina
components, such as alumina wear tile.
Saint-Gobain manufactures and sells
alumina wear tile out of its Latrobe,
Pennsylvania facility. In 2009, SaintGobain’s Advanced Ceramics Business
achieved sales of 135 million euros.
III. The Products and Structure of the
Alumina Wear Tile Markets
The Commission’s complaint alleges
that Keystone’s acquisition of SaintGobain’s North American alumina wear
tile assets poses substantial antitrust
concerns in both the pre-engineered and
standard alumina wear tile markets, or
alternatively, an all alumina wear tile
market in North America. Alumina wear
tile is used to line material-handling
equipment to protect against abrasion
and premature wear caused by the
materials that pass through the
equipment, extending the life of the
equipment for years. Although other
materials could be used as a wear
solution these materials are not viable
substitutes for alumina wear tile, as they
do not have the unique price and wear
attributes that are required in
applications where alumina wear tile is
commonly used.
The Commission’s complaint alleges
that the relevant markets within which
to analyze the transaction are standard
and pre-engineered alumina wear tile,
or alternatively, all alumina wear tile.
Standard alumina wear tile comes in a
variety of predetermined sizes and
shapes whereas pre-engineered alumina
wear tile is custom made-to-order to fit
complex shapes that standard tile sizes
cannot accommodate.
The Commission’s complaint alleges
that the relevant geographic market in
which to assess the impact of the
proposed acquisition is North America.
Successful participation in the market
requires an established North American
presence, most notably North American
sales support and facilities from which
to inventory and distribute alumina
wear tile. Alumina wear tile companies
that do not have an established presence
in North America do not effectively
compete for the business of U.S.
alumina wear tile purchasers.
Keystone and Saint-Gobain are two of
three significant suppliers of preengineered alumina wear tile and two of
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
557
four significant suppliers of standard
alumina wear tile in North America. In
an all alumina wear tile market,
Keystone and Saint-Gobain are two of
four significant suppliers in North
America. The acquisition would
increase concentration levels
substantially in markets that already are
highly concentrated.
IV. Effects of the Acquisition
The Commission’s complaint charges
that the proposed acquisition would
enhance the likelihood of collusion or
coordinated interaction among the
remaining firms in the market. Certain
market conditions, including product
homogeneity and the availability of
detailed market information about
customers and transactions are
conducive to the firms reaching terms of
coordination and detecting deviations
from those terms.
The Commission’s complaint also
charges that Keystone’s acquisition of
Saint-Gobain’s North American alumina
wear tile assets would eliminate actual,
direct, and substantial competition
between CoorsTek and Saint-Gobain. By
increasing CoorsTek’s market share
substantially, while at the same time
eliminating the most significant
competitor in the market, an acquisition
of Saint-Gobain’s North American
alumina tile assets likely would allow
CoorsTek to unilaterally charge higher
prices for alumina wear tile.
The Commission’s complaint alleges
that significant impediments to entry,
expansion or repositioning in the
alumina wear tile markets make entry
unlikely, untimely and likely
unprofitable. The size of the investment
and the time needed to enter the
relevant markets relative to the size of
the overall market is substantial. Entry
is made more difficult due to
reputational hurdles, and there is
uncertainty that an entrant could secure
the sales to make the investment
profitable. As a result, new entry,
expansion, or repositioning by other
firms sufficient to achieve a significant
market impact is unlikely to ameliorate
the harms posed by the proposed
transaction.
V. The Proposed Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement
addresses the competitive risks of a
future sale of Saint-Gobain’s North
American alumina tile business to
Keystone or others. By imposing certain
prior approval and prior notice
conditions on Keystone and SaintGobain, the remedy serves to ensure that
the assets of Saint-Gobain’s North
American alumina wear tile business
will remain, and continue to compete,
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
558
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2011 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
in the North American alumina wear
tile markets.
Pursuant to the proposed Consent
Agreement, for a period of ten years
Keystone must obtain Commission
approval prior to acquiring, directly or
indirectly, Saint-Gobain’s alumina wear
tile assets. These assets primarily
include the Latrobe facility, but also
include assets of Saint-Gobain’s alumina
wear tile business or any interest in
assets owned or controlled by SaintGobain relating to the research,
development, marketing, and sale
anywhere in the world of alumina wear
tile produced and manufactured in
North America.
Pursuant to the proposed Consent
Agreement, for a period of five years
Saint-Gobain must provide advance
written notification to the Commission
before selling all or substantially all of
its North American alumina wear tile
business to any person other than an
affiliate. Saint-Gobain also must provide
prior notice to the Commission before
closing or ceasing operations at the
Latrobe facility, subject to certain
exceptions for maintenance,
construction of improvements, and the
like, and for involuntary closures due to
force majeure, health and safety
emergencies, and other such events.
As part of ensuring the continued
viability of Saint-Gobain’s alumina wear
tile business, Keystone, pursuant to the
proposed Consent Agreement, must
comply with all terms of alumina wear
tile business agreements between
Keystone and Saint-Gobain. One of
these agreements is a supply agreement
for certain types of standard alumina
tile produced at the Vinhedo, Brazil
facility (‘‘Vinhedo tile) that Keystone
will acquire from Saint-Gobain. This
supply agreement gives Saint-Gobain
access to the alumina wear tile from the
Vinhedo facility for a limited interim
period, by which time Saint-Gobain will
be required to find another source for
the Vinhedo tile or produce it
internally.
VI. Opportunity for Public Comment
The proposed Consent Agreement has
been placed on the public record for
thirty days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
the public record. After thirty days, the
Commission will review the comments
received, and decide whether to
withdraw from the proposed Consent
Agreement, modify it, or make it final.
By accepting the proposed Consent
Agreement subject to final approval, the
Commission anticipates that the
competitive problems alleged in the
complaint will be resolved. The purpose
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Jan 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
of this analysis is to inform and invite
public comment on the proposed
Consent Agreement, including the
proposed remedy, and to aid the
Commission in its determination of
whether to make the proposed Consent
Agreement final. This analysis is not
intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Consent
Agreement, nor to modify the terms of
the proposed Consent Agreement in any
way.
By direction of the Commission.
Richard C. Donohue,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–33245 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation; Medicare
Program; Meeting of the Technical
Advisory Panel on Medicare Trustee
Reports
Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice announces public
meetings of the Technical Advisory
Panel on Medicare Trustee Reports
(Panel). Notice of these meetings is
given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2, section
10(a)(1) and (a)(2)). The Panel will
discuss the long-term rate of change in
health spending and may make
recommendations to the Medicare
Trustees on how the Trustees might
more accurately estimate health
spending in the long run. The Panel’s
discussion is expected to be very
technical in nature and will focus on the
actuarial and economic assumptions
and methods by which Trustees might
more accurately measure health
spending. Although panelists are not
limited in the topics they may discuss,
the Panel is not expected to discuss or
recommend changes in current or future
Medicare provider payment rates or
coverage policy.
Meeting Dates: January 10, 2011,
9 a.m. to 6 p.m. and January 28, 2011,
9:30 a.m.–5 p.m. e.t.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
HHS headquarters at 200 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20201,
Room 705A.
Comments: The meeting will allocate
time on the agenda to hear public
comments. In lieu of oral comments,
formal written comments may be
submitted for the record to Donald T.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Oellerich, OASPE, 200 Independence
Ave., SW., 20201, Room 405F. Those
submitting written comments should
identify themselves and any relevant
organizational affiliations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald T Oellerich (202) 690–8410,
Don.oellerich@hhs.gov. Note: Although
the meeting is open to the public,
procedures governing security
procedures and the entrance to Federal
buildings may change without notice.
Those wishing to attend the meeting
must call or e-mail Dr. Oellerich by
Thursday January 6, 2011 for the
meeting on January 10 and Tuesday
January 25, 2011 for the meeting on
January 28, so that their name may be
put on a list of expected attendees and
forwarded to the security officers at
HHS Headquarters.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Topics of the Meeting: The Panel is
specifically charged with discussing and
possibly making recommendations to
the Medicare Trustees on how the
Trustees might more accurately estimate
the long term rate of health spending in
the United States. The discussion is
expected to focus on highly technical
aspects of estimation involving
economics and actuarial science.
Panelists are not restricted, however, in
the topics that they choose to discuss.
Procedure and Agenda: This meeting
is open to the public. The Panel will
likely hear presentations from Medicare
public trustees are on issues they wish
the panel to address. This may be
followed by HHS staff presentations
regarding long range growth. After any
presentations, the Panel will deliberate
openly on the topic. Interested persons
may observe the deliberations, but the
Panel will not hear public comments
during this time. The Panel will also
allow an open public session for any
attendee to address issues specific to the
topic.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 217a; Section 222 of
the Public Health Services Act, as amended.
The panel is governed by provisions of
Public Law 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C.
Appendix 2), which sets forth standards for
the formation and use of advisory
committees.
Dated: December 28, 2010.
Sherry Glied,
Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2010–33296 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM
05JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 555-558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33245]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 101 0175]
Keystone Holdings, LLC and Compagnie de Saint-Gobain; Analysis of
Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent
agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 1, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments
electronically or in paper form. Comments should refer to ``Keystone,
File No. 101 0175 to facilitate the organization of comments. Please
note that your comment--including your name and your state--will be
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including on the
publicly accessible FTC Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm.
Because comments will be made public, they should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as
[[Page 556]]
an individual's Social Security Number; date of birth; driver's license
number or other state identification number, or foreign country
equivalent; passport number; financial account number; or credit or
debit card number. Comments also should not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical records or other individually
identifiable health information. In addition, comments should not
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information
which is obtained from any person and which is privileged or
confidential * * *, as provided in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15
U.S.C. 46(f), and Commission Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2).
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for
confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment
to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted
or denied by the Commissions General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because paper mail addressed to the FTC is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening, please consider submitting your comments
in electronic form. Comments filed in electronic form should be
submitted by using the following weblink: https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/keystone and following the instructions
on the web-based form. To ensure that the Commission considers an
electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form at the
Weblink: https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/keystone. If this
Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp, you may
also file an electronic comment through that website. The Commission
will consider all comments that regulations.gov forwards to it. You may
also visit the FTC Web site at https://www.ftc.gov/ to read the Notice
and the news release describing it.
A comment filed in paper form should include the ``Keystone, File
No. 101 0175 reference both in the text and on the envelope, and should
be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting
that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security
precautions.
The Federal Trade Commission Act (``FTC Act) and other laws the
Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive public comments that it receives,
whether filed in paper or electronic form. Comments received will be
available to the public on the FTC Web site, to the extent practicable,
at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission makes every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's
privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Lippincott (202-326-2983),
Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Sec. 2.34 the
Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that
the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to
cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a
period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page
(for December 29, 2010), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
Public comments are invited, and may be filed with the Commission
in either paper or electronic form. All comments should be filed as
prescribed in the ADDRESSES section above, and must be received on or
before the date specified in the DATES section.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
I. Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission) has accepted for public
comment, subject to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent
Order (``Consent Agreement) from Keystone Holdings LLC (``Keystone) and
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain (``Saint-Gobain''). The purpose of the
proposed Consent Agreement is to remedy the anticompetitive effects
resulting from Keystone's proposed acquisition of certain Advanced
Ceramics Business assets from Saint-Gobain (``proposed acquisition). As
originally structured, Keystone would have acquired Saint-Gobain's
worldwide assets and businesses relating to the manufacture and sale of
alumina wear tiles. To resolve the competitive concerns raised by the
proposed acquisition, Keystone and Saint-Gobain have re-structured the
original transaction to exclude Saint-Gobain's North American alumina
wear tile business operated out of a facility in Latrobe, Pennsylvania.
Under the terms of the proposed Consent Agreement, Keystone is
required for ten years to obtain prior approval from the Commission for
the direct or indirect acquisition of Saint-Gobain's alumina wear tile
business in Latrobe or certain other assets owned or controlled by
Saint-Gobain relating to the research, development, marketing, and sale
anywhere in the world of alumina wear tile produced or manufactured in
North America. The proposed Consent Agreement also requires that Saint-
Gobain for five years provide advance written notice to the Commission
prior to leasing or selling the Latrobe, Pennsylvania facility or
selling, assigning, or otherwise conveying substantially all its
interest in the Saint-Gobain alumina wear tile business. In addition,
with limited exceptions, Saint-Gobain is obligated to provide advance
written notice to the Commission prior to closing the Latrobe,
Pennsylvania facility or ceasing operation or production of alumina
wear tiles at the facility.
The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record
for thirty days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments
received during this period will become part of the public record.
After thirty days, the Commission will again review the proposed
Consent Agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it
should withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement, modify it, or make
it final.
[[Page 557]]
On June 28, 2010, Keystone and Saint-Gobain entered into a merger
agreement under which Keystone proposed to acquire Saint-Gobain's
Advanced Ceramics Business, including facilities in Europe, North
America, South America, and Asia for a purchase price of $245 million.
As originally structured, the assets acquired by Keystone would have
included the Latrobe facility and other assets relating to the
manufacture and sale of alumina wear tiles. On December 2, 2010,
however, in an effort to resolve competitive concerns relating to the
original transaction, Keystone and Saint-Gobain amended their agreement
to exclude from the sale Saint-Gobain's North American alumina wear
tile business.
The Commission's complaint alleges that the initial proposed
acquisition, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton
Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45, by lessening competition in
the manufacture and sale of standard and pre-engineered alumina wear
tile in North America. Although Saint-Gobain now proposes to retain its
North American alumina wear tile business, a credible risk exists that
the parties could re-negotiate the sale of Saint-Gobain's alumina wear
tile business in the future, or that Saint-Gobain could sell the
business upon terms that would reduce competition in the North American
alumina wear tile markets. Therefore, the proposed Consent Agreement
requires that Keystone obtain the Commission's prior approval in
advance of any acquisition of Saint-Gobain's alumina wear tile business
or related assets, and requires that Saint-Gobain provide written
notice to the Commission prior to selling or ceasing its alumina wear
tile business or selling or leasing its Latrobe, Pennsylvania facility.
This remedy preserves competition in the North American markets for the
manufacture and sale of alumina wear tile.
II. Parties
Keystone is the holding company of CoorsTek, Inc. (``CoorsTek),
which is a leading technical ceramics manufacturer, supplying ceramics
based products for use in defense, medical, automotive, semiconductor,
and power generation applications, among others. Keystone is
headquartered in Golden, Colorado with facilities in North America,
Europe and Asia. Keystone manufactures and sells alumina wear tile for
use in high wear applications at its facilities in Golden, Colorado.
Saint-Gobain is a highly diversified, multinational company,
headquartered in Courbevoie, France. The Advanced Ceramics Business
includes ceramic components such as hot surface igniters, electro-
ceramic parts for household appliances, ceramic balls for high-
performance bearings, automobile water pump seals, special components
for the semiconductor industry, agricultural spray nozzles, and other
dense alumina components, such as alumina wear tile. Saint-Gobain
manufactures and sells alumina wear tile out of its Latrobe,
Pennsylvania facility. In 2009, Saint-Gobain's Advanced Ceramics
Business achieved sales of 135 million euros.
III. The Products and Structure of the Alumina Wear Tile Markets
The Commission's complaint alleges that Keystone's acquisition of
Saint-Gobain's North American alumina wear tile assets poses
substantial antitrust concerns in both the pre-engineered and standard
alumina wear tile markets, or alternatively, an all alumina wear tile
market in North America. Alumina wear tile is used to line material-
handling equipment to protect against abrasion and premature wear
caused by the materials that pass through the equipment, extending the
life of the equipment for years. Although other materials could be used
as a wear solution these materials are not viable substitutes for
alumina wear tile, as they do not have the unique price and wear
attributes that are required in applications where alumina wear tile is
commonly used.
The Commission's complaint alleges that the relevant markets within
which to analyze the transaction are standard and pre-engineered
alumina wear tile, or alternatively, all alumina wear tile. Standard
alumina wear tile comes in a variety of predetermined sizes and shapes
whereas pre-engineered alumina wear tile is custom made-to-order to fit
complex shapes that standard tile sizes cannot accommodate.
The Commission's complaint alleges that the relevant geographic
market in which to assess the impact of the proposed acquisition is
North America. Successful participation in the market requires an
established North American presence, most notably North American sales
support and facilities from which to inventory and distribute alumina
wear tile. Alumina wear tile companies that do not have an established
presence in North America do not effectively compete for the business
of U.S. alumina wear tile purchasers.
Keystone and Saint-Gobain are two of three significant suppliers of
pre-engineered alumina wear tile and two of four significant suppliers
of standard alumina wear tile in North America. In an all alumina wear
tile market, Keystone and Saint-Gobain are two of four significant
suppliers in North America. The acquisition would increase
concentration levels substantially in markets that already are highly
concentrated.
IV. Effects of the Acquisition
The Commission's complaint charges that the proposed acquisition
would enhance the likelihood of collusion or coordinated interaction
among the remaining firms in the market. Certain market conditions,
including product homogeneity and the availability of detailed market
information about customers and transactions are conducive to the firms
reaching terms of coordination and detecting deviations from those
terms.
The Commission's complaint also charges that Keystone's acquisition
of Saint-Gobain's North American alumina wear tile assets would
eliminate actual, direct, and substantial competition between CoorsTek
and Saint-Gobain. By increasing CoorsTek's market share substantially,
while at the same time eliminating the most significant competitor in
the market, an acquisition of Saint-Gobain's North American alumina
tile assets likely would allow CoorsTek to unilaterally charge higher
prices for alumina wear tile.
The Commission's complaint alleges that significant impediments to
entry, expansion or repositioning in the alumina wear tile markets make
entry unlikely, untimely and likely unprofitable. The size of the
investment and the time needed to enter the relevant markets relative
to the size of the overall market is substantial. Entry is made more
difficult due to reputational hurdles, and there is uncertainty that an
entrant could secure the sales to make the investment profitable. As a
result, new entry, expansion, or repositioning by other firms
sufficient to achieve a significant market impact is unlikely to
ameliorate the harms posed by the proposed transaction.
V. The Proposed Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement addresses the competitive risks of a
future sale of Saint-Gobain's North American alumina tile business to
Keystone or others. By imposing certain prior approval and prior notice
conditions on Keystone and Saint-Gobain, the remedy serves to ensure
that the assets of Saint-Gobain's North American alumina wear tile
business will remain, and continue to compete,
[[Page 558]]
in the North American alumina wear tile markets.
Pursuant to the proposed Consent Agreement, for a period of ten
years Keystone must obtain Commission approval prior to acquiring,
directly or indirectly, Saint-Gobain's alumina wear tile assets. These
assets primarily include the Latrobe facility, but also include assets
of Saint-Gobain's alumina wear tile business or any interest in assets
owned or controlled by Saint-Gobain relating to the research,
development, marketing, and sale anywhere in the world of alumina wear
tile produced and manufactured in North America.
Pursuant to the proposed Consent Agreement, for a period of five
years Saint-Gobain must provide advance written notification to the
Commission before selling all or substantially all of its North
American alumina wear tile business to any person other than an
affiliate. Saint-Gobain also must provide prior notice to the
Commission before closing or ceasing operations at the Latrobe
facility, subject to certain exceptions for maintenance, construction
of improvements, and the like, and for involuntary closures due to
force majeure, health and safety emergencies, and other such events.
As part of ensuring the continued viability of Saint-Gobain's
alumina wear tile business, Keystone, pursuant to the proposed Consent
Agreement, must comply with all terms of alumina wear tile business
agreements between Keystone and Saint-Gobain. One of these agreements
is a supply agreement for certain types of standard alumina tile
produced at the Vinhedo, Brazil facility (``Vinhedo tile) that Keystone
will acquire from Saint-Gobain. This supply agreement gives Saint-
Gobain access to the alumina wear tile from the Vinhedo facility for a
limited interim period, by which time Saint-Gobain will be required to
find another source for the Vinhedo tile or produce it internally.
VI. Opportunity for Public Comment
The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record
for thirty days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments
received during this period will become part of the public record.
After thirty days, the Commission will review the comments received,
and decide whether to withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement,
modify it, or make it final. By accepting the proposed Consent
Agreement subject to final approval, the Commission anticipates that
the competitive problems alleged in the complaint will be resolved. The
purpose of this analysis is to inform and invite public comment on the
proposed Consent Agreement, including the proposed remedy, and to aid
the Commission in its determination of whether to make the proposed
Consent Agreement final. This analysis is not intended to constitute an
official interpretation of the proposed Consent Agreement, nor to
modify the terms of the proposed Consent Agreement in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Richard C. Donohue,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-33245 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P