Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Hazardous Liquid Pipelines, 303-304 [2010-33234]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 239 and 258
[EPA–EPA–R10–RCRA–2010–0953; FRL–
9247–5]
Alaska: Adequacy of Alaska’s
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Permit
Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA Region 10 proposes to
approve Alaska’s modification of its
approved Municipal Solid Waste
Landfill (MSWLF) permit program. On
March 22, 2004, EPA issued final
regulations allowing Research,
Development, and Demonstration
(RD&D) permits to be issued to certain
MSWLFs by approved states. On
September 7, 2010 Alaska submitted an
application to EPA Region 10 seeking
Federal approval of its RD&D
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing on or
before February 3, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
RCRA–2010–0953, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: calabro.domenic@epa.gov.
• Fax: (206) 553–6640, to the
attention of Domenic Calabro
• Mail: Send written comments to
Domenic Calabro, Office of Air, Waste,
and Toxics, U.S. EPA, Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mailstop:
AWT–122, Seattle, WA 98101.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to: Domenic Calabro,
Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, U.S.
EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900, Mailstop: AWT–122, Seattle,
WA 98101. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Office’s normal
hours of operation.
For detailed instructions on how to
submit comments, please see the direct
final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Domenic Calabro at (206) 553–6640 or
by e-mail at calabro.domenic@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Rules section of this Federal Register,
EPA is approving Alaska’s Research,
Development, and Demonstration
(RD&D) permit program through a direct
final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Jan 03, 2011
Jkt 223001
noncontroversial action and anticipates
no adverse comments to this action.
Unless we get written adverse
comments which oppose this approval
during the comment period, the direct
final rule will become effective on the
date it establishes, and we will not take
further action on this proposal. If EPA
receives written adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule.
EPA will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time. For
additional information, see the direct
final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2010–33195 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
303
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: DOT Docket Management
System: U.S. DOT, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System; West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001 between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Instructions: You should identify the
Docket No. PHMSA–2010–0229 at the
beginning of your comments. If you
submit your comments by mail, submit
two copies. To receive confirmation that
PHMSA received your comments,
include a self-addressed stamped
postcard. Internet users may submit
comments at https://
www.regulations.gov.
49 CFR Part 195
Note: Comments are posted without
changes or edits to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. There is a privacy
statement published on https://
www.regulations.gov.
[Docket ID PHMSA–2010–0229]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
RIN 2137–AE66
Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore
Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
Extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
On October 18, 2010, (75 FR
63774), PHMSA published in the
Federal Register an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) titled:
‘‘Safety of On-Shore Hazardous Liquid
Pipelines’’ seeking comments on the
need for changes to the regulations
covering hazardous liquid onshore
pipelines. PHMSA has received requests
to extend the comment period in order
to have more time to evaluate the
ANPRM. PHMSA has concurred in part
with these requests and has extended
the comment period from January 18,
2011, to February 18, 2011.
DATES: The closing date for filing
comments is extended from January 18,
2011, until February 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference
Docket No. PHMSA–2010–0229 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
• E-Gov Web Site: https://
www.Regulations.gov. This site allows
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For
further information contact Mike Israni
at 202–366–4566 or by e-mail at
mike.israni@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 18, 2010, (75 FR 63774),
PHMSA published an ANPRM seeking
comments on the need for changes to
the regulations covering hazardous
liquid onshore pipelines. In particular,
PHMSA is interested in knowing
whether it should extend regulation to
certain pipelines currently exempt from
regulation; whether other areas along a
pipeline should be identified for extra
protection or be included as additional
high consequences areas (HCAs) for
Integrity Management (IM) protection;
whether to establish and/or adopt
standards and procedures for minimum
leak detection requirements for all
pipelines; whether to require the
installation of emergency flow
restricting devices (EFRDs) in certain
areas; whether revised valve spacing
requirements are needed on new
construction or existing pipelines;
whether repair timeframes should be
specified for pipeline segments in areas
outside the HCAs that are assessed as
part of IM; and whether to establish
and/or adopt standards and procedures
for improving the methods of
preventing, detecting, assessing and
remediating stress corrosion cracking in
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
304
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
hazardous liquid pipeline systems. On
November 15, 2010, the American
Petroleum Institute and the Association
of Oil Pipe Lines requested PHMSA to
extend the ANPRM comment period
deadline a minimum of 60 days to give
their members sufficient time to
respond to this ANPRM. Likewise, on
November 29, 2010, Texas Oil and Gas
Association requested extension of the
comment period a minimum of 60 days.
PHMSA has concurred, in part, with
these requests and has extended the
comment period from January 18, 2011,
to February 18, 2011. This extension
will provide sufficient time for
submission of comments concerning
this ANPRM.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
23, 2010.
Linda Daugherty,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy
and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–33234 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
Background
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R7–ES–2010–0061; MO
92210–0–0008]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a
Petition To List the Red Knot
Subspecies Calidris canutus roselaari
as Endangered
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition
finding.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce a
90-day finding on a petition to list the
roselaari subspecies of red knot
(Calidris canutus roselaari) as
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
Based on our review, we find that the
petition does not present substantial
information indicating that listing this
subspecies may be warranted.
Therefore, we are not initiating a status
review in response to this petition.
However, we ask the public to submit to
us any new information that becomes
available concerning the status of, or
threats to, C. c. roselaari or its habitat
at any time.
DATES: The finding announced in this
document was made on January 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: This finding is available on
the Internet at https://
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Jan 03, 2011
www.regulations.gov at Docket Number
FWS–R7–ES–2010–0061. Supporting
documentation we used in preparing
this finding is available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Fairbanks Fish
and Wildlife Field Office, 101 12th
Avenue, Room 110, Fairbanks, AK
99701. Please submit any new
information, materials, comments, or
questions concerning this finding to the
above street address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted
Swem, Branch Chief, Endangered
Species Program of the Fairbanks Fish
and Wildlife Field Office (see
ADDRESSES); by telephone (907–456–
0441); or by facsimile to (907–456–
0208). If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), please call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 223001
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that we
make a finding on whether a petition to
list, delist, or reclassify a species
presents ‘‘substantial scientific or
commercial information’’ indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted.
We base this finding on information
provided in the petition, supporting
information submitted with the petition,
and information otherwise available in
our files. To the maximum extent
practicable, we make this finding within
90 days of our receipt of the petition,
and publish our notice of the finding
promptly in the Federal Register.
Our standard for ‘‘substantial
scientific or commercial information’’ is
the ‘‘amount of information that would
lead a reasonable person to believe that
the measure proposed in the petition
may be warranted’’ (50 CFR 424.14(b)).
If we find that ‘‘substantial scientific or
commercial information’’ was presented,
we are required to promptly conduct a
species status review, which we
summarize in a subsequent finding due
within 12 months.
Petition History and Previous Federal
Action
On February 27, 2008, we received a
petition, dated February 27, 2008, from
Defenders of Wildlife, American Littoral
Society, American Bird Conservancy,
Delaware Audubon, Delaware Nature
Society, Delaware Riverkeeper Network,
National Audubon Society, New Jersey
Audubon Society, and Citizens
Campaign for the Environment,
requesting that the Department of the
Interior (Department) use its emergency
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
authorities under section 4(b)(7) of the
Act to list the red knot C. c. rufa
subspecies as an endangered species.
The petitioners also seek to have the
Department list as endangered ‘‘a
broader taxon comprising both the rufa
subspecies and the roselaari
subspecies.’’ The petition further calls
for a ‘‘national listing based on
similarity of appearance’’ under section
4(e) of the Act. The petition contains the
requisite identification information for
the petitioners, as required at 50 CFR
424.14(a).
We previously made a ‘‘warranted but
precluded’’ determination (in response
to one petition received on August 9,
2004, and two others received on
August 5, 2005), on September 12, 2006,
for the C. c. rufa subspecies and added
this subspecies to our list of candidate
species with a listing priority number of
6 (71 FR 53758–53759). ‘‘Warranted but
precluded’’ means we have sufficient
information on biological vulnerability
and threats to support a proposal to list
as endangered or threatened, but that
preparation and publication of a listing
proposal is precluded by higher priority
listing actions. In a May 1, 2008, letter
responding to the current petition, we
stated that while we had previously
made a determination that listing C. c.
rufa was ‘‘warranted but precluded’’ and
added the subspecies to our candidate
list, we were re-evaluating—as part of
our annual candidate review process—
whether listing remained ‘‘warranted but
precluded’’ and whether to utilize the
emergency listing provisions of the Act.
We also stated in our May 1, 2008, letter
that, due to court orders and judicially
approved settlement agreements for
other listing and critical habitat
determinations under the Act that
required nearly all of our listing and
critical habitat funding for fiscal year
2008, we would not be able to further
address the petition’s request to list C.
c. roselaari at that time but would
complete the action when workload and
funding allowed. Subsequently, in the
2008 Candidate Notice of Review for C.
c. rufa, the Service took into
consideration the information supplied
by the petitioners and changed the
listing priority number from 6 to 3 for
this subspecies because threats were
determined to be imminent (73 FR
75178–75179, December 10, 2008).
Because we determined that it was not
necessary, the Service did not
emergency list C. c. rufa, as set forth in
the October 29, 2009, Species
Assessment and Listing Priority
Assignment Form for Calidris canutus
rufa (Service 2009). In the 2009
Candidate Notice of Review for C. c.
E:\FR\FM\04JAP1.SGM
04JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 303-304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33234]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 195
[Docket ID PHMSA-2010-0229]
RIN 2137-AE66
Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; Extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 18, 2010, (75 FR 63774), PHMSA published in the
Federal Register an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)
titled: ``Safety of On-Shore Hazardous Liquid Pipelines'' seeking
comments on the need for changes to the regulations covering hazardous
liquid onshore pipelines. PHMSA has received requests to extend the
comment period in order to have more time to evaluate the ANPRM. PHMSA
has concurred in part with these requests and has extended the comment
period from January 18, 2011, to February 18, 2011.
DATES: The closing date for filing comments is extended from January
18, 2011, until February 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should reference Docket No. PHMSA-2010-0229 and may
be submitted in the following ways:
E-Gov Web Site: https://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: DOT Docket Management System: U.S. DOT, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System; West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-
0001 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Instructions: You should identify the Docket No. PHMSA-2010-0229 at
the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail,
submit two copies. To receive confirmation that PHMSA received your
comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may
submit comments at https://www.regulations.gov.
Note: Comments are posted without changes or edits to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
There is a privacy statement published on https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Mike
Israni at 202-366-4566 or by e-mail at mike.israni@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 18, 2010, (75 FR 63774), PHMSA
published an ANPRM seeking comments on the need for changes to the
regulations covering hazardous liquid onshore pipelines. In particular,
PHMSA is interested in knowing whether it should extend regulation to
certain pipelines currently exempt from regulation; whether other areas
along a pipeline should be identified for extra protection or be
included as additional high consequences areas (HCAs) for Integrity
Management (IM) protection; whether to establish and/or adopt standards
and procedures for minimum leak detection requirements for all
pipelines; whether to require the installation of emergency flow
restricting devices (EFRDs) in certain areas; whether revised valve
spacing requirements are needed on new construction or existing
pipelines; whether repair timeframes should be specified for pipeline
segments in areas outside the HCAs that are assessed as part of IM; and
whether to establish and/or adopt standards and procedures for
improving the methods of preventing, detecting, assessing and
remediating stress corrosion cracking in
[[Page 304]]
hazardous liquid pipeline systems. On November 15, 2010, the American
Petroleum Institute and the Association of Oil Pipe Lines requested
PHMSA to extend the ANPRM comment period deadline a minimum of 60 days
to give their members sufficient time to respond to this ANPRM.
Likewise, on November 29, 2010, Texas Oil and Gas Association requested
extension of the comment period a minimum of 60 days. PHMSA has
concurred, in part, with these requests and has extended the comment
period from January 18, 2011, to February 18, 2011. This extension will
provide sufficient time for submission of comments concerning this
ANPRM.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 23, 2010.
Linda Daugherty,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-33234 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P