Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Los Angeles to San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN North) Rail Corridor Improvements Studies: Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo counties, California, 414-415 [2010-33146]
Download as PDF
414
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices
be produced or displayed to Agency
staff or other parties entitled to access.
You do not need to request an
exemption or obtain prior permission so
long as the electronic record meets all
of the regulation’s substantive
requirements and remains accessible in
a form that can be accurately
reproduced for later reference. (This
does not apply to documents filed
directly with the Agency. See Question
No. 6.) Examples of documents
generated, maintained or exchanged by
private parties include, but are not
limited to: Employment applications,
driver histories and other qualification
records, leases formed under 49 CFR
part 376, driver-vehicle inspection
reports, and records of duty status.
These are only examples of documents
about which FMCSA received specific
questions and is not an exhaustive list
of the types of documents that can be
generated, signed, maintained or
exchanged electronically.
Question 12: May I convert a paper
document to an electronic document by
typing the substantive information on
the paper document into an electronic
format such as a database?
Guidance: By typing the substantive
information from a paper document into
an electronic format such as a database,
you are creating a new electronic record,
not creating an electronic copy of the
original. While you may generate and
maintain such documents for your own
use, they do not take the place of the
original documents. To preserve an
accurate copy of the original paper
document, you must use scanning or
other ‘‘image capture’’ technology. See
Questions 3 and 4 for additional
guidance.
Question 13: Is an electronic signature
valid if a person only has access to an
excerpt or summary at the time he or
she signs a document?
Guidance: No. If you only provide an
excerpt or summary at the time someone
signs a document you may not
subsequently attach his or her electronic
signature to the complete document.
Issued on: December 29, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administratior.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2010–33238 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:35 Jan 03, 2011
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement
for the Los Angeles to San Luis
Obispo (LOSSAN North) Rail Corridor
Improvements Studies: Los Angeles,
Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis
Obispo counties, California
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
FRA is issuing this notice to
advise the public that FRA with the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) will jointly prepare a Tier-1
environmental impact statement (EIS)
and a program environmental impact
report (EIR) for rail corridor
improvements to the Los Angeles to San
Luis Obispo (LOSSAN North) rail
corridor (LOSSAN North Program). FRA
is also issuing this notice to solicit
public and agency input into the
development of the scope of the EIR/EIS
and to advise the public that outreach
activities conducted by Caltrans and its
representatives will be considered in the
preparation of the EIR/EIS. The
objective of the Tier-1 EIR/EIS is to
evaluate alternatives and present
thorough environmental analysis to help
make corridor level decisions regarding
the level of intercity passenger rail
service provided in the corridor,
including variations in train frequency,
trip time, and on-time performance.
DATES: Locations, dates, and start and
end times for public meetings involving
the EIS are listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information regarding the Tier-1
environmental review, please contact:
Ms. Lea Simpson, Manager, California
Department of Transportation, Division
of Rail, MS 74, PO Box 942874,
Sacramento, CA 94274–0001, (telephone
916–654–7184) or Ms. Melissa Elefante
DuMond, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Office of Railroad Policy and
Development, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE. (Mail Stop 20),
Washington, DC 20590, (telephone 202–
493–6366).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Purpose and Need
FRA and Caltrans have determined
that improvements to the existing
LOSSAN North rail corridor are
necessary to meet the expected growth
in population and resulting increases in
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intercity travel demand between Los
Angeles and San Luis Obispo. As a
result of this growth in travel demand,
their travel delays from the growing
congestion on California’s highways and
at airports will increase. In terms of
passenger volume, the LOSSAN corridor
is the second-busiest intercity rail
corridor in the nation, after the
Northeast Corridor connecting
Washington DC, New York, and Boston.
However, rail capacity constraints result
in rail congestion and travel delays
which is compounded by delays related
to weather conditions, accidents and
other factors which collectively result in
unreliable rail service. In addition, in
some cases rail infrastructure has not
been upgraded or improved in over one
hundred years. Goals of the project
underlying the environmental review
include increasing the cost-effectiveness
of State-supported intercity passenger
rail systems; increasing the rail capacity
on existing routes; reduction in running
times to attract additional riders and to
provide a more attractive service; and
improvement to the safety of Statesupported intercity rail service.
Rail Services Along Corridor
Amtrak uses the LOSSAN rail
corridor for the Pacific Surfliner Service
between Los Angeles and San Luis
Obispo that is supported by Caltrans.
Amtrak’s Coast Starlight (service
between Los Angeles, the Bay Area, and
Portland/Seattle) also operates on the
corridor. The Southern California
Regional Rail Authority also uses the
LOSSAN rail corridor for their
Metrolink commuter rail service
between Los Angeles and Ventura.
Union Pacific operates freight service
along the corridor.
Environmental Review Process
The EIS/EIR will be developed in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 and the Council
on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations (40 CFR part 1500 et seq.)
implementing NEPA; the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Division 13, Public Resources Code; and
FRA’s Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts (64 FR 28545;
May 26, 1999). The FRA and the
Caltrans will use a tiered process, as
provided for in 40 CFR 1508.28 and in
accordance with FRA Procedures for the
completion of the environmental review
of the LOSSAN North Program.
‘‘Tiering’’ is a staged environmental
review process often applied to
environmental reviews for complex
transportation projects. The initial
phase (Tier-1 EIS) of this process will
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices
address broad questions and likely
environmental effects for the entire
corridor including, but not limited to,
the type of service(s) being proposed,
including cities and stations served,
route alternatives, service levels, types
of operations (speed, electric, or diesel
powered), ridership projections, major
infrastructure components, and
identification of major terminal area or
facility capacity constraints. Subsequent
phases or tiers will analyze, at a greater
level of detail, narrower site-specific
proposals based on any decisions made
in the Tier-1 EIR/EIS.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Alternatives
Alternatives to be evaluated and
analyzed in the Program EIR/EIS
include a no-action (No-Project or NoBuild) scenario and an alternative with
multiple options that considers the
construction of incremental,
independent passenger rail
improvements in the LOSSAN North
rail corridor. Possible environmental
impacts include displacement of
commercial and residential properties;
disproportionate impacts to minority
and low-income populations;
community and neighborhood
disruption; increased noise and
vibration along the rail corridor; traffic
impacts associated with stations; effects
to historic properties or archaeological
sites; impacts to parks and recreation
resources; visual quality effects;
exposure to seismic and flood hazards;
impacts to water resources, wetlands,
and sensitive biological species and
habitat; land use compatibility impacts;
energy use; and impacts to agricultural
lands.
No-Build Alternative
The no action (No-Project or NoBuild) alternative is defined to serve as
the baseline for comparison of all
alternatives. The No-Build Alternative
represents the State’s transportation
system (highway, air, and rail) as it
exists, and as it would exist after
completion of programs or projects
currently funded or being implemented.
The No-Build Alternative would draw
upon the following sources of
information:
• State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP).
• Regional Transportation Plans
(RTPs) for all modes of travel.
• Airport plans.
• Passenger rail plans.
Passenger Rail Alternative and Options
The LOSSAN North Program
improvements are incremental,
independent rail upgrade projects to the
LOSSAN corridor. The Passenger Rail
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:35 Jan 03, 2011
Jkt 223001
Alternative will have ‘‘options’’ that
consider timing of the improvements
and logical groupings of improvements
that reflect likely funding scenarios. The
upgrade of the LOSSAN rail corridor
was previously studied in the LOSSAN
North Corridor Strategic Plan issued in
October 2007, which identified major
improvements that could be undertaken
between the Los Angeles Union Station
and the San Luis Obispo Amtrak
Station. The improvements to be
discussed in the program EIR/EIS may
include:
• Track upgrades.
• Curve realignments.
• Siding extensions and upgrades.
• Addition of second main track.
• Grade separations.
• Station and platform upgrades.
• Track realignments.
• Run-through tracks.
• Pedestrian crossing upgrades.
• Installation of Centralized Traffic
Control (CTC).
Scoping and Comments
FRA encourages broad participation
in the EIR/EIS process during scoping
and subsequent review of the resulting
environmental document. Letters
describing the proposed project and
soliciting comments were sent to
appropriate Federal, State, and local
agencies, and appropriate railroads.
Comments and suggestions are invited
from all interested agencies and the
public at large to insure the full range
of issues related to the proposed action
and all reasonable alternatives are
addressed and all significant issues are
identified. In particular, FRA is
interested in determining whether there
are areas of environmental concern
where there might be the potential for
significant impacts identifiable at a
program level. Public agencies with
jurisdiction are requested to advise the
FRA and Caltrans of the applicable
permit and environmental review
requirements of each agency, and the
scope and content of the environmental
information that is germane to the
agency’s statutory responsibilities in
connection with the proposed
improvements.
Scoping meetings will be advertised
locally and are planned for the
following major cities along the
LOSSAN North rail corridor at the dates
and times indicated:
• Los Angeles: January 10, 2011; 5
through 7 PM; Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(Metro) Headquarters—Board Room One
Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA.
• Ventura: January 11, 2011; 5
through 7 PM; Camarillo Public Library,
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
415
4101 Las Posas Road, Camarillo, CA
93010.
• Santa Barbara: January 12, 2011; 5
through 7 PM; Louise Lowry Davis
Center, Lu Gilbert Room, 1232 De La
Vina St., Santa Barbara, CA, 93101.
• San Luis Obispo: January 13, 2011;
5 through 7 PM; San Luis Obispo City/
County Public Library, Community
Room, 995 Palm Street, San Luis
Obispo, CA 93401.
Persons interested in providing
comments on the scope of the Tier-1
EIR/EIS should do so by February 3,
2011. Comments can be sent in writing
to Ms. Melissa Elefante DuMond at the
FRA address identified above.
Comments may also be addressed to Ms.
Lea Simpson of Caltrans at their address
identified above. Information regarding
the environmental review process and
technical studies will be made available
through Caltrans’ rail services Internet
site: https://www.amtrakcalifornia.com/.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
28, 2010.
Karen Rae,
Deputy Administrator, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–33146 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation
Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is
hereby given of a meeting of the
Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence
Seaway Development Corporation
(SLSDC), to be held from 1 p.m. (EDT)
on Monday, January 24, 2011, via
conference call at the Corporation’s
Administration Headquarters, Suite
W32–300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC. The agenda for this
meeting will be as follows: Opening
Remarks; Consideration of Minutes of
Past Meeting; Quarterly Report; Old and
New Business; Closing Discussion;
Adjournment.
Attendance at the meeting is open to
the interested public but limited to the
space available. With the approval of
the Administrator, members of the
public may present oral statements at
the meeting. Persons wishing further
information should contact, not later
than Wednesday, January 19, 2011,
Anita K. Blackman, Chief of Staff, Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 414-415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33146]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Los Angeles to San
Luis Obispo (LOSSAN North) Rail Corridor Improvements Studies: Los
Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo counties, California
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that FRA with
the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will jointly
prepare a Tier-1 environmental impact statement (EIS) and a program
environmental impact report (EIR) for rail corridor improvements to the
Los Angeles to San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN North) rail corridor (LOSSAN
North Program). FRA is also issuing this notice to solicit public and
agency input into the development of the scope of the EIR/EIS and to
advise the public that outreach activities conducted by Caltrans and
its representatives will be considered in the preparation of the EIR/
EIS. The objective of the Tier-1 EIR/EIS is to evaluate alternatives
and present thorough environmental analysis to help make corridor level
decisions regarding the level of intercity passenger rail service
provided in the corridor, including variations in train frequency, trip
time, and on-time performance.
DATES: Locations, dates, and start and end times for public meetings
involving the EIS are listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the
Tier-1 environmental review, please contact: Ms. Lea Simpson, Manager,
California Department of Transportation, Division of Rail, MS 74, PO
Box 942874, Sacramento, CA 94274-0001, (telephone 916-654-7184) or Ms.
Melissa Elefante DuMond, Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of
Railroad Policy and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE. (Mail Stop 20), Washington, DC 20590, (telephone
202-493-6366).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
FRA and Caltrans have determined that improvements to the existing
LOSSAN North rail corridor are necessary to meet the expected growth in
population and resulting increases in intercity travel demand between
Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo. As a result of this growth in travel
demand, their travel delays from the growing congestion on California's
highways and at airports will increase. In terms of passenger volume,
the LOSSAN corridor is the second-busiest intercity rail corridor in
the nation, after the Northeast Corridor connecting Washington DC, New
York, and Boston. However, rail capacity constraints result in rail
congestion and travel delays which is compounded by delays related to
weather conditions, accidents and other factors which collectively
result in unreliable rail service. In addition, in some cases rail
infrastructure has not been upgraded or improved in over one hundred
years. Goals of the project underlying the environmental review include
increasing the cost-effectiveness of State-supported intercity
passenger rail systems; increasing the rail capacity on existing
routes; reduction in running times to attract additional riders and to
provide a more attractive service; and improvement to the safety of
State-supported intercity rail service.
Rail Services Along Corridor
Amtrak uses the LOSSAN rail corridor for the Pacific Surfliner
Service between Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo that is supported by
Caltrans. Amtrak's Coast Starlight (service between Los Angeles, the
Bay Area, and Portland/Seattle) also operates on the corridor. The
Southern California Regional Rail Authority also uses the LOSSAN rail
corridor for their Metrolink commuter rail service between Los Angeles
and Ventura. Union Pacific operates freight service along the corridor.
Environmental Review Process
The EIS/EIR will be developed in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 and the Council
on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR part 1500 et seq.)
implementing NEPA; the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Division 13, Public Resources Code; and FRA's Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts (64 FR 28545; May 26, 1999). The FRA
and the Caltrans will use a tiered process, as provided for in 40 CFR
1508.28 and in accordance with FRA Procedures for the completion of the
environmental review of the LOSSAN North Program.
``Tiering'' is a staged environmental review process often applied
to environmental reviews for complex transportation projects. The
initial phase (Tier-1 EIS) of this process will
[[Page 415]]
address broad questions and likely environmental effects for the entire
corridor including, but not limited to, the type of service(s) being
proposed, including cities and stations served, route alternatives,
service levels, types of operations (speed, electric, or diesel
powered), ridership projections, major infrastructure components, and
identification of major terminal area or facility capacity constraints.
Subsequent phases or tiers will analyze, at a greater level of detail,
narrower site-specific proposals based on any decisions made in the
Tier-1 EIR/EIS.
Alternatives
Alternatives to be evaluated and analyzed in the Program EIR/EIS
include a no-action (No-Project or No-Build) scenario and an
alternative with multiple options that considers the construction of
incremental, independent passenger rail improvements in the LOSSAN
North rail corridor. Possible environmental impacts include
displacement of commercial and residential properties; disproportionate
impacts to minority and low-income populations; community and
neighborhood disruption; increased noise and vibration along the rail
corridor; traffic impacts associated with stations; effects to historic
properties or archaeological sites; impacts to parks and recreation
resources; visual quality effects; exposure to seismic and flood
hazards; impacts to water resources, wetlands, and sensitive biological
species and habitat; land use compatibility impacts; energy use; and
impacts to agricultural lands.
No-Build Alternative
The no action (No-Project or No-Build) alternative is defined to
serve as the baseline for comparison of all alternatives. The No-Build
Alternative represents the State's transportation system (highway, air,
and rail) as it exists, and as it would exist after completion of
programs or projects currently funded or being implemented. The No-
Build Alternative would draw upon the following sources of information:
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) for all modes of
travel.
Airport plans.
Passenger rail plans.
Passenger Rail Alternative and Options
The LOSSAN North Program improvements are incremental, independent
rail upgrade projects to the LOSSAN corridor. The Passenger Rail
Alternative will have ``options'' that consider timing of the
improvements and logical groupings of improvements that reflect likely
funding scenarios. The upgrade of the LOSSAN rail corridor was
previously studied in the LOSSAN North Corridor Strategic Plan issued
in October 2007, which identified major improvements that could be
undertaken between the Los Angeles Union Station and the San Luis
Obispo Amtrak Station. The improvements to be discussed in the program
EIR/EIS may include:
Track upgrades.
Curve realignments.
Siding extensions and upgrades.
Addition of second main track.
Grade separations.
Station and platform upgrades.
Track realignments.
Run-through tracks.
Pedestrian crossing upgrades.
Installation of Centralized Traffic Control (CTC).
Scoping and Comments
FRA encourages broad participation in the EIR/EIS process during
scoping and subsequent review of the resulting environmental document.
Letters describing the proposed project and soliciting comments were
sent to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, and appropriate
railroads. Comments and suggestions are invited from all interested
agencies and the public at large to insure the full range of issues
related to the proposed action and all reasonable alternatives are
addressed and all significant issues are identified. In particular, FRA
is interested in determining whether there are areas of environmental
concern where there might be the potential for significant impacts
identifiable at a program level. Public agencies with jurisdiction are
requested to advise the FRA and Caltrans of the applicable permit and
environmental review requirements of each agency, and the scope and
content of the environmental information that is germane to the
agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed
improvements.
Scoping meetings will be advertised locally and are planned for the
following major cities along the LOSSAN North rail corridor at the
dates and times indicated:
Los Angeles: January 10, 2011; 5 through 7 PM; Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Headquarters--
Board Room One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA.
Ventura: January 11, 2011; 5 through 7 PM; Camarillo
Public Library, 4101 Las Posas Road, Camarillo, CA 93010.
Santa Barbara: January 12, 2011; 5 through 7 PM; Louise
Lowry Davis Center, Lu Gilbert Room, 1232 De La Vina St., Santa
Barbara, CA, 93101.
San Luis Obispo: January 13, 2011; 5 through 7 PM; San
Luis Obispo City/County Public Library, Community Room, 995 Palm
Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401.
Persons interested in providing comments on the scope of the Tier-1
EIR/EIS should do so by February 3, 2011. Comments can be sent in
writing to Ms. Melissa Elefante DuMond at the FRA address identified
above. Comments may also be addressed to Ms. Lea Simpson of Caltrans at
their address identified above. Information regarding the environmental
review process and technical studies will be made available through
Caltrans' rail services Internet site: https://www.amtrakcalifornia.com/.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 28, 2010.
Karen Rae,
Deputy Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-33146 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P