Federal Acquisition Regulation; Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel, 82575-82576 [2010-32895]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 250 / Thursday, December 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 4 and 52
[FAC 2005–48; FAR Case 2009–027; Item
II; Docket 2010–0091, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AL60
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Personal Identity Verification of
Contractor Personnel
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
provide additional regulatory coverage
to reinforce the requirement of
collecting from contractors all forms of
Government-provided identification
once they are no longer needed to
support a contract.
DATES: Effective Date: January 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Mr.
Michael Jackson, Procurement Analyst,
at (202) 208–4949. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at (202) 501–4755. Please
cite FAC 2005–48, FAR Case 2009–027.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES4
I. Background
DoD Inspector General Audit Report
No. D–2009–005, entitled ‘‘Controls
Over the Contractor Common Access
Card Life Cycle,’’ addressed whether
Government controls over contractor
Common Access Cards (CAC) were in
place and worked as intended. A ‘‘CAC’’
is the DoD term for a Personal Identity
Verification (PIV) card. A PIV card is
required in order to gain access to a
Federal facility. The most prevalent
issue of the audit report, and the one
that DoD, GSA, and NASA are
undertaking to resolve with this case,
was that the CACs were not adequately
accounted for after contract performance
or completion.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are amending
the FAR by inserting new paragraphs
(d)(1) and (d)(2) under FAR 4.1301,
Policy. Paragraph (d)(1) provides policy
on recovering PIVs. Paragraph (d)(1)
requires that agency procedures ensure
that Government contractors account for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 Dec 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
82575
all forms of Government-provided
identification issued to Government
contractors under a contract, and return
such identification to the issuing agency
at the earliest of any of the following,
unless otherwise determined by the
agency: When no longer needed for
contract performance; upon completion
of a contractor employee’s employment;
or upon contract completion or
termination. Paragraph (d)(2) authorizes
the contracting officer to delay final
payment under a contract if the
contractor fails to comply with these
requirements.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are also
modifying FAR clause 52.204–9,
Personal Identity Verification of
Contractor Personnel, to be consistent
with FAR part 4.
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register at
75 FR 28771 on May 24, 2010. Three
respondents submitted four comments
on the proposed rule, which are
addressed below.
Although none of the public
comments received caused a change in
the FAR text, the FAR text is changed
in the final rule as follows:
• FAR 4.1301(d)(1) is revised to
clarify that this section applies to
agency procedures related to PIV card
return.
• FAR 4.1301(d)(1) and 52.204–9(b)
are revised to clarify that the rule
applies when PIV cards are issued to
contractor employees.
• FAR 52.204–9(d) is revised to
clarify that the rule flows down to all
subcontractor employees when they are
required to have access to a Federallycontrolled facility and/or routine access
to a Federally-controlled information
system.
• FAR 52.204–9(d) is also revised to
clarify that the prime contractor is
responsible for returning all
subcontractor PIV cards that have been
issued by an agency.
PIV cards to become inactive if they
have not been used after a prolonged
period of time.
II. Discussion of Public Comments
D. Withholding Payment
Comment: The same respondent had
concerns about how long the
Government may withhold payment for
non-compliance. The respondent stated
that the period of time that final
payment may be delayed should be
specified, e.g., ‘‘not to exceed 30 days’’
or ‘‘pending satisfactory resolution of
the non-compliance.’’
Response: It would be unwise to state
a specific date such as ‘‘not to exceed 30
days’’ because the contractor may need
a longer time to return the PIV card.
Adding language like ‘‘pending
satisfactory resolution of the noncompliance’’ is superfluous, as it is a
given that the Government would only
A. Lost Cards
Comment: Two respondents stated
that they have concerns over what
happens when a contractor claims to
have lost an identity card and therefore
cannot return it.
Response: Each agency will establish
policies for control of PIV cards. Some
agencies, for example, may replace a
lost card once, but costs for replacement
of any subsequent lost PIV cards may be
borne by the contractor. The respondent
may be voicing concern that there is a
potential for misuse and fraud with lost
cards. DoD, GSA, and NASA
recommend that agencies program the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
B. Timing
Comment: Another respondent
expressed concern with waiting until
the closeout period instead of taking
care of the PIV cards at contract
completion.
Response: The FAR rule does not
authorize waiting until the closeout
period, but instead requires the
contractor to take action as its
employees leave, and again at contract
completion. If the contractor fails to take
action as its employees leave or at
contract completion and the contracting
officer does not follow up, then the
contracting officer must reconcile the
matter at contract closeout.
C. Contractor Involvement in Issuance
Process
Comment: Another respondent stated
that contractor companies are not
typically involved in the PIV card
issuance process. Further, contractor
responsibility for PIV card retrieval
could be improved through involving
the contractor/subcontractor in the PIV
card issuance process.
Response: The Defense Acquisition
Regulation Council and the Civilian
Agency Acquisition Council agree that
PIV card retrieval could be improved if
the contractor was notified when an
employee is issued a PIV card. DoD,
GSA, and NASA recommend that
agencies amend their PIV card
procedures, if they are not doing so
already, to notify the contractor
company when an agency issues a PIV
card to a contractor employee. In
addition, the rule has been revised to
state that the prime contractor is
responsible for the return of all PIV
cards that have been issued to the
subcontractor’s employees by the
agency.
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
82576
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 250 / Thursday, December 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules
hold final payment until the noncompliance has been resolved.
III. Executive Order 12866
This is not a significant regulatory
action and, therefore, is not subject to
review under Section 6(b) of Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA certify that this
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the
requirements of the actions required and
the clause are not significantly
burdensome. Currently, it is a common
business practice to have procedures in
place to revoke and return PIV cards
when no longer in use by the contractor.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
FAR do not impose information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4 and
52
Government procurement.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
Millisa Gary,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR parts 4 and 52 as set
forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 4 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 4–ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
2. Amend section 4.1301 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
4.1301
Policy.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES4
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Agency procedures for the
return of Personal Identity Verification
(PIV) products shall ensure that
Government contractors account for all
forms of Government-provided
identification issued to Government
contractor employees under a contract,
i.e., the PIV cards or other similar
badges, and shall ensure that contractors
return such identification to the issuing
agency as soon as any of the following
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 Dec 29, 2010
Jkt 223001
occurs, unless otherwise determined by
the agency:
(i) When no longer needed for
contract performance.
(ii) Upon completion of a contractor
employee’s employment.
(iii) Upon contract completion or
termination.
(2) The contracting officer may delay
final payment under a contract if the
contractor fails to comply with these
requirements.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. Amend section 52.204–9 by
revising the date of the clause;
redesignating paragraph (b) as paragraph
(d); adding a new paragraph (b); adding
paragraph (c); and revising newly
redesignated paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
■
52.204–9 Personal Identity Verification of
Contractor Personnel.
*
*
*
*
*
Personal Identity Verification of
Contractor Personnel (JAN 2011)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Contractor shall account for all
forms of Government-provided identification
issued to the Contractor employees in
connection with performance under this
contract. The Contractor shall return such
identification to the issuing agency at the
earliest of any of the following, unless
otherwise determined by the Government:
(1) When no longer needed for contract
performance.
(2) Upon completion of the Contractor
employee’s employment.
(3) Upon contract completion or
termination.
(c) The Contracting Officer may delay final
payment under a contract if the Contractor
fails to comply with these requirements.
(d) The Contractor shall insert the
substance of this clause, including this
paragraph (d), in all subcontracts when the
subcontractor‘s employees are required to
have routine physical access to a Federallycontrolled facility and/or routine access to a
Federally-controlled information system. It
shall be the responsibility of the prime
Contractor to return such identification to the
issuing agency in accordance with the terms
set forth in paragraph (b) of this section,
unless otherwise approved in writing by the
Contracting Officer.
(End of Clause)
[FR Doc. 2010–32895 Filed 12–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 49
[FAC 2005–48; FAR Case 2009–031; Item
III; Docket 2010–0090, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AL56
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Terminating Contracts
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
clarify the applicability of procedures
regarding the termination of contracts to
the acquisition of commercial items.
DATES: Effective Date: January 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Ms.
Jeritta Parnell, at (202) 501–4082. For
information pertaining to status or
publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–48, FAR
Case 2009–031.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule with request for
comments in the Federal Register on
May 20, 2010 (75 FR 28228). This rule
clarifies that FAR part 49, Termination
of Contracts, does not apply to the
acquisition of commercial items when
using FAR part 12 procedures.
Discussion of Public Comments
One respondent provided two
comments. A discussion of the
comments and the changes made to the
proposed rule are summarized as
follows:
1. Comment: The respondent
recommended clarifying the coverage at
FAR 49.501 by moving the existing
language to FAR 49.002. This language
clarifies that FAR part 49 does not apply
to commercial item contracts awarded
using FAR part 12 procedures.
Response: The Defense Acquisition
Regulation Council and the Civilian
Agency Acquisition Council (Councils)
agree. The language at FAR 49.501,
pertaining to the applicability of FAR
part 49 to commercial item contracts has
E:\FR\FM\30DER4.SGM
30DER4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 82575-82576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32895]
Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 250 / Thursday, December 30, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 82575]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 4 and 52
[FAC 2005-48; FAR Case 2009-027; Item II; Docket 2010-0091, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AL60
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Personal Identity Verification of
Contractor Personnel
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to provide additional regulatory
coverage to reinforce the requirement of collecting from contractors
all forms of Government-provided identification once they are no longer
needed to support a contract.
DATES: Effective Date: January 31, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact
Mr. Michael Jackson, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 208-4949. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-48, FAR
Case 2009-027.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD Inspector General Audit Report No. D-2009-005, entitled
``Controls Over the Contractor Common Access Card Life Cycle,''
addressed whether Government controls over contractor Common Access
Cards (CAC) were in place and worked as intended. A ``CAC'' is the DoD
term for a Personal Identity Verification (PIV) card. A PIV card is
required in order to gain access to a Federal facility. The most
prevalent issue of the audit report, and the one that DoD, GSA, and
NASA are undertaking to resolve with this case, was that the CACs were
not adequately accounted for after contract performance or completion.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are amending the FAR by inserting new paragraphs
(d)(1) and (d)(2) under FAR 4.1301, Policy. Paragraph (d)(1) provides
policy on recovering PIVs. Paragraph (d)(1) requires that agency
procedures ensure that Government contractors account for all forms of
Government-provided identification issued to Government contractors
under a contract, and return such identification to the issuing agency
at the earliest of any of the following, unless otherwise determined by
the agency: When no longer needed for contract performance; upon
completion of a contractor employee's employment; or upon contract
completion or termination. Paragraph (d)(2) authorizes the contracting
officer to delay final payment under a contract if the contractor fails
to comply with these requirements.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are also modifying FAR clause 52.204-9, Personal
Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel, to be consistent with
FAR part 4.
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 28771 on May 24, 2010. Three respondents submitted
four comments on the proposed rule, which are addressed below.
Although none of the public comments received caused a change in
the FAR text, the FAR text is changed in the final rule as follows:
FAR 4.1301(d)(1) is revised to clarify that this section
applies to agency procedures related to PIV card return.
FAR 4.1301(d)(1) and 52.204-9(b) are revised to clarify
that the rule applies when PIV cards are issued to contractor
employees.
FAR 52.204-9(d) is revised to clarify that the rule flows
down to all subcontractor employees when they are required to have
access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a
Federally-controlled information system.
FAR 52.204-9(d) is also revised to clarify that the prime
contractor is responsible for returning all subcontractor PIV cards
that have been issued by an agency.
II. Discussion of Public Comments
A. Lost Cards
Comment: Two respondents stated that they have concerns over what
happens when a contractor claims to have lost an identity card and
therefore cannot return it.
Response: Each agency will establish policies for control of PIV
cards. Some agencies, for example, may replace a lost card once, but
costs for replacement of any subsequent lost PIV cards may be borne by
the contractor. The respondent may be voicing concern that there is a
potential for misuse and fraud with lost cards. DoD, GSA, and NASA
recommend that agencies program the PIV cards to become inactive if
they have not been used after a prolonged period of time.
B. Timing
Comment: Another respondent expressed concern with waiting until
the closeout period instead of taking care of the PIV cards at contract
completion.
Response: The FAR rule does not authorize waiting until the
closeout period, but instead requires the contractor to take action as
its employees leave, and again at contract completion. If the
contractor fails to take action as its employees leave or at contract
completion and the contracting officer does not follow up, then the
contracting officer must reconcile the matter at contract closeout.
C. Contractor Involvement in Issuance Process
Comment: Another respondent stated that contractor companies are
not typically involved in the PIV card issuance process. Further,
contractor responsibility for PIV card retrieval could be improved
through involving the contractor/subcontractor in the PIV card issuance
process.
Response: The Defense Acquisition Regulation Council and the
Civilian Agency Acquisition Council agree that PIV card retrieval could
be improved if the contractor was notified when an employee is issued a
PIV card. DoD, GSA, and NASA recommend that agencies amend their PIV
card procedures, if they are not doing so already, to notify the
contractor company when an agency issues a PIV card to a contractor
employee. In addition, the rule has been revised to state that the
prime contractor is responsible for the return of all PIV cards that
have been issued to the subcontractor's employees by the agency.
D. Withholding Payment
Comment: The same respondent had concerns about how long the
Government may withhold payment for non-compliance. The respondent
stated that the period of time that final payment may be delayed should
be specified, e.g., ``not to exceed 30 days'' or ``pending satisfactory
resolution of the non-compliance.''
Response: It would be unwise to state a specific date such as ``not
to exceed 30 days'' because the contractor may need a longer time to
return the PIV card. Adding language like ``pending satisfactory
resolution of the non-compliance'' is superfluous, as it is a given
that the Government would only
[[Page 82576]]
hold final payment until the non-compliance has been resolved.
III. Executive Order 12866
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, is not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA certify that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because the requirements of the actions required and the clause
are not significantly burdensome. Currently, it is a common business
practice to have procedures in place to revoke and return PIV cards
when no longer in use by the contractor.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to
the FAR do not impose information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 4 and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: December 22, 2010.
Millisa Gary,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
0
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 4 and 52 as set forth
below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 4 and 52 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 4-ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
0
2. Amend section 4.1301 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
4.1301 Policy.
* * * * *
(d)(1) Agency procedures for the return of Personal Identity
Verification (PIV) products shall ensure that Government contractors
account for all forms of Government-provided identification issued to
Government contractor employees under a contract, i.e., the PIV cards
or other similar badges, and shall ensure that contractors return such
identification to the issuing agency as soon as any of the following
occurs, unless otherwise determined by the agency:
(i) When no longer needed for contract performance.
(ii) Upon completion of a contractor employee's employment.
(iii) Upon contract completion or termination.
(2) The contracting officer may delay final payment under a
contract if the contractor fails to comply with these requirements.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
3. Amend section 52.204-9 by revising the date of the clause;
redesignating paragraph (b) as paragraph (d); adding a new paragraph
(b); adding paragraph (c); and revising newly redesignated paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel.
* * * * *
Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel (JAN 2011)
* * * * *
(b) The Contractor shall account for all forms of Government-
provided identification issued to the Contractor employees in
connection with performance under this contract. The Contractor
shall return such identification to the issuing agency at the
earliest of any of the following, unless otherwise determined by the
Government:
(1) When no longer needed for contract performance.
(2) Upon completion of the Contractor employee's employment.
(3) Upon contract completion or termination.
(c) The Contracting Officer may delay final payment under a
contract if the Contractor fails to comply with these requirements.
(d) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause,
including this paragraph (d), in all subcontracts when the
subcontractor`s employees are required to have routine physical
access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a
Federally-controlled information system. It shall be the
responsibility of the prime Contractor to return such identification
to the issuing agency in accordance with the terms set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section, unless otherwise approved in writing
by the Contracting Officer.
(End of Clause)
[FR Doc. 2010-32895 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P